Volume 2021, Issue 1 2070375
Research Article
Open Access

Effects of Nigella sativa on Performance, Blood Profiles, and Antibody Titer against Newcastle Disease in Broilers

Alireza Talebi

Corresponding Author

Alireza Talebi

Department of Poultry Health & Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, P.O. Box 57153-1177tbox57153-1177, Urmia, Iran urmia.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Masoud Maham

Masoud Maham

Department of Large Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, P.O. Box 57153-1177, Urmia, Iran urmia.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Siamak Asri-Rezaei

Siamak Asri-Rezaei

Department of Large Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, P.O. Box 57153-1177, Urmia, Iran urmia.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Pouya Pournaghi

Pouya Pournaghi

Graduated of Veterinary College, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran urmia.ac.ir

Department of Biology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran pnu.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Mohammad-Sadegh Khorrami

Mohammad-Sadegh Khorrami

Graduated of Veterinary College, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran urmia.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Amir Derakhshan

Amir Derakhshan

Graduated of Veterinary College, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran urmia.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 June 2021
Citations: 6
Academic Editor: Valeria Sülsen

Abstract

Recent anxiety about resistance to chemical drugs has elevated the position of phytogenic feed additives including Nigella sativa in preventive strategy in the poultry industry. During this study, a completely randomized experiment was designed to investigate the efficacy of different levels (0 to 16%) of N. sativa seeds supplemented in the diet of broilers on performance, immune responses, and hematological and biochemical parameters. The results indicated the following: (a) Supplementation of 1% N. sativa seeds in diet had the highest positive effects and 16% N. sativa had the highest significant (p = 0.03) adverse effects on weight gain, while up to 2% N. sativa seeds in the diet reduced feed conversion ratio (FCR) whereas 4% and over that increased the FCR. (b) Chickens fed with a diet containing 1% N. sativa seeds had the highest antibody titers, but those fed with 16% N. sativa seeds had the lowest antibody titers at end of the experiment. (c) Dietary inclusion of N. sativa seeds increased hemogram parameters and the group fed with 16% N. sativa seeds had the highest values on day 21 until the end of the experiment. (d) Supplementation of N. sativa seeds decreased in WBC and lymphocytes but increased heterophils, H/L, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils percentages. Supplementation of up to 2% of N. sativa seeds in broiler’s diets elaborated serum level of those parameters, while supplementation of ≥ 4% N. sativa seeds decreased their serum levels. In conclusion, supplementation of N. sativa seed (1-2%) in broiler diets, as a multipurpose natural growth promoter, improves performance, elevates humoral immune responses, affects serum biochemical profiles of broiler chickens, and induces changes in their hemogram and leukogram, while there are no side, residual, and hazardous effects.

1. Introduction

Phytogenic feed additives “phytobiotic” are assuming a position of prime importance in the poultry industry [13] and could be used in feed or water [4]. Among the promising phytogenic immune-stimulants, Nigella sativa (N. sativa) is a miracle medicinal herb having a long history with a rich religious background [5, 6]. N. sativa seeds are used for the treatment of some disorders and illnesses including fever, common cold, headache, asthma, various Gram-positive and Gram-negative microbial infections [7], aflatoxicosis [8], antiethanol hepatotoxicity [9], and alleviation of adverse effects of heat stress [10], as well as to expel worms from the intestines. The possible biochemical active components of N. sativa and their pharmacological effects have been investigated [11, 12], and their pharmacological actions as immune stimulation, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiparasitic activities[5, 1317] have also been studied. Recently, the potential effects of N. sativa seeds’ bioactive compounds (such as thymoquinone, α-hederin, and nigellidine) in control of the COVID-19 pandemic have also been documented [1820]. In the production of healthy food, supplementation of N. sativa seeds to poultry diets could be recommended as a natural growth promoter instead of antibiotics. Previous reports indicate that diets containing different levels of N. sativa seeds improve the performance and carcass characteristics in broilers [5, 21]. The inclusion of N. sativa seeds in layers’ diet also increases egg production as well as eggs’ quality [22] and serum triglycerides in layers [23]. However, N. sativa also affects blood profile and biochemical parameters [24, 25] and prevents atherogenesis by decreasing LDL-cholesterol and increasing HDL cholesterol [26]. N. sativa can control infectious diseases and regulate adaptive immunity via enhancement of macrophages [27]. Effects of N. sativa on cell-mediated immunity [28] and humoral immunity [29] have also been investigated. Although it has been documented that N. sativa has immunomodulatory effects [5], the type of immune responses against various pathogens provoked by N. sativa may need further investigations. However, interest in herbal medicines and their multiple beneficial utilization in poultry health and performance has been recently reviewed [5, 6, 3032]. Finding the best beneficial and safe phytogenic feed additives as the most suitable substitute to antibiotic promoters is much more today’s research topic [1, 2, 4, 3335].

The objective of this research was a comprehensive study on the efficacy of N. sativa as a multipurpose feed additive on performance, blood profiles, and humoral immune responses in broiler chickens. To the best of our knowledge, the closest reports to our study in the literature are works of Al-Beitawi et al. [29], Durrani et al. [36], Shewita and Taha [37], Ghasemi et al. [38], Hossain et al. [39], Shirzadegan et al. [40], Singh and Kumar [41], and Aydogan et al. [42], and the present study has a lot of differences with them including the use of various percentages of N. sativa seeds in diets and weekly measurement of performance, immune responses, serum biochemical parameters, hemogram, and leukogram indices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics of Experimentation

All experimental procedures were carried out according to the standard animal experimentation protocols of the Veterinary Ethics Committee of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University (Ref. IR-UU-AEC-3/902/DA).

2.2. Experimental Design and Chicken Management

In a completely randomized experiment, one hundred sixty unsexed one-day-old chicks (Ross-308) were divided into 8 treatment groups (20 chicks/group) with 4 replicates. The treatment groups were T0 = control 1 (without vaccination and without supplementation of N. sativa in diet), T1 = control 2 (T0 + Vaccination), T2 = T1 + N. sativa 0.5%, T3 = T1 + N. sativa1%, T4 = T1 + N. sativa 2%, T5 = T1 + N. sativa 4%, T6 = T1 + N. sativa 8%, and T7 = T1 + N. sativa 16%. After leg labeling, the chicks were housed in separated boxes, and environmental conditions (ambient temperature, humidity, lighting, ventilation, nutrition, etc.) are provided according to the technical instructions of Ross-308 for the broiler management guide. The basal diets (Table 1) were prepared according to the Ross-308 broiler nutritional specification guide. Energy and protein of N. sativa seed treated (T2–T7) groups’ diets were roughly balanced by reducing 0.1 Kg oil + 0.47 Kg corn + 0.43 Kg soybean meal for supplementation of each 1 Kg of N. sativa seed.

Table 1. Ingredients and nutrients of the basal diet.
Ingredients (E kcal, CP %) Starter (1–10 days) Grower (11–10 day 25 days) Finisher >26 days)
Corn (3350, 8.9) 51% 42% 36%
Soya meal (2300, 44) 42% 35.5% 32.4%
Wheat (2900, 12) 10% 14%
Barley (2600, 11) 4% 8%
Oil (9000, 0) 3.3% 5.4% 7%
Oyster shell 1.6% 1.4% 1.2%
Monocalcium phosphate 1.3% 1.2% 1.1%
Vitamin premix 0.25% 0.25% 0.25%
Mineral premix 0.25% 0.25% 0.25%
Cl Na 0.15% 0.15% 0.15%
DKAB complex 0.1% 0.05% 0.05%
L-Lysin 0.1% 0.08% 0.08%
DL-Methionin 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
N. sativa seed (3450, 23) 0 0 0
Total 100.15 100.33 100.58
Energy and protein of 1 kg N. sativa seeds were simply considered equal to nutrients of 0.47 kg corn + 0.43 kg soya meal + 0.1 kg oil; therefore, for each 1 kg of N. sativa seeds supplementation, 0.47 kg corn + 0.43 kg soya meal + 0.1 kg oil were reduced.
Calculate major nutrients
Energy (E) kcal/KgF 3001.5 3103.5 3202.8
Protein (CP) % 23.02 21.0 20.02
E/CP 130.35 147.66 160.14
Calcium % 0.973 0.865 0.802
Phosphorus % 0.448 0.44 0.40

2.3. Vaccines and Vaccination Routes

According to break-through level 1:8 (log 2-3) of maternal antibody [43], live ND clone 30 vaccine (eye-drop route) together with ND oil (subcutaneous route) is used for primary vaccination on day 9 of age, and the chickens were revaccinated with live ND clone-30 vaccine by eye-drop method [44] on the 21st day.

2.4. Sampling Procedures

Blood samples for hematological tests (using EDTA anticoagulant-treated syringes) and blood samples for evaluation of immunity and biochemical tests were collected on day one and then at weekly intervals until the end of the experimental period (42 days old), as previously described [45]. Blood samples were labeled according to the number and date of sampling and kept at room temperature until clotted, and then, the sera were separated for serological tests.

2.5. Evaluation of Performance

The performance of the chickens for each week was determined.

2.6. Evaluation of Antibody Titer

On day one and day seven of age, serum samples were used to evaluate maternally derived antibodies of the chicks to determine the best time of first vaccination. On day 14 and weekly interval, serum samples were used to assess protective immune response derived from vaccination against ND by application of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test as it has been reported that the HI test is an excellent indicator of the immune status and disease resistance of a flock, especially to assess protective responses following vaccination because, unlike ELISA, HI test correlates well with the more laborious virus neutralization (VN) assays [44].

2.7. Hematological Tests

Hematological parameters such as red blood cell (RBC) counts, PCV, hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, white blood cells (WBC) counts, and percentages of heterophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and heterophils to lymphocytes (H/L) ratio were determined by routine methods as previously described [46].

2.8. Biochemical Tests

Serum biochemical parameters values were determined by using an autoanalyzer (Technicon RA 1000 TM, Hartwell, LA, USA) and specific Pars-Azmun kits (Pars-Azmun Co., Tehran, Iran) as follows: albumin (ALB) concentration (mg/dL with the bromcresol green method at 546 nm WL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) concentration (U/L with DGKC method at 405 nm WL), alanine transaminase (ALT), or serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) concentration (U/L with Opt. standard method, IFCC at 340 nm WL), aspartate transaminase (AST) or serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) concentration (U/L with Opt. standard method, IFCC at 340 nm WL), calcium concentration (mg/dL with cresolphthalein complex method at 550–590 nm WL), cholesterol concentration (mg/dl with chod-pap method at 546 nm WL), glucose concentration (mg/dL with god-pap method at 500–546 nm WL), phosphorus concentration (mg/dL with UV method at 340 nm WL), total protein concentration (mg/dL with Biuret method at 540–546 nm WL), and triglyceride concentration (mg/dL with gpo-pap enzymatic method at 546 nm WL).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed by using the SPSS software (Version 21; SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The means for the treatments showing significant differences in the ANOVA were compared using the Post Hoc Tukey and Wilcoxon (nonparametric tests, 2 related samples) tests used for analyzing data of each parameter within the group and between groups. The relationship between age and parameter contents was ascertained through the Spearman correlation coefficient test. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Performance

N. sativa had some effects on the performance of the chickens (Table 2), and as shown in Figure 1, the chickens of group T3 fed with a diet containing 1% N. sativa seeds had the highest weight at the end of the experiment but differences with those of the groups (T0–T5) were not significant (p > 0.05), but those with those of the groups (T6 and T7) were significant (p < 0.05). Dietary inclusion of 16% N. sativa seeds had a significant (p < 0.03) depressive effect on weight gain of chickens (T7) during the experimental period. As shown in Table 2, the feed efficiency ratio was affected by the level of N. sativa seeds, and supplementation (T3 and T4) of the diet with 1%–2% N. sativa seeds had decreased FCR but 8%–16% increased FCR.

Table 2. Effects of N. sativa on weekly performance (mean ± SEM) of broilers.
Age (day) Group Weight (g) Weight gain (g) Feed (g/week) FCR (weekly) FCR (total)
Day 1 T0–T7 39.64 ± 0.08NS
Day 7 T0 167.5 ± 5.6a 128.0 ± 5.4a 205 ± 5.5 1.60 ± 0.07a 1.22 ± 0.04a
T1 157.8 ± 6.5a 118.6 ± 4.6b 195 ± 4.6 1.65 ± 0.05 b 1.23 ± 0.05a
T2 157.1 ± 5.8a 117.4 ± 4.7bc 190 ± 4.0 1.62 ± 0.03ab 1.21 ± 0.03a
T3 160.4 ± 6.2a 120.8 ± 5.2 b 193 ± 3.5 1.60 ± 0.04a 1.20 ± 0.04a
T4 157.8 ± 7.5a 118.0 ± 4.6bc 189 ± 4.0 1.60 ± 0.05a 1.20 ± 0.05a
T5 151.3 ± 6.0a 111.7 ± 5.0c 181 ± 3.7 1.62 ± 0.06ab 1.20 ± 0.06a
T6 146.0 ± 3.5ab 106.3 ± 6.2dc 175 ± 4.0 1.65 ± 0.05b 1.20 ± 0.04a
T7 137.0 ± 3.4b 97.3 ± 4.0e 175 ± 4.5 1.80 ± 0.06c 1.27 ± 0.05a
Day 14 T0 417.8 ± 19.2a 250.3 ± 11.0a 451 ± 15.0 1.80 ± 0.07a 1.57 ± 0.06a
T1 391.7 ± 11.9a 234.0 ± 12.5bd 440 ± 16.5 1.88 ± 0.06ab 1.62 ± 0.05ac
T2 406.3 ± 19.1a 249.2 ± 13.0ca 461 ± 20.0 1.85 ± 0.06ab 1.60 ± 0.06ac
T3 426.0 ± 26.9a 265.6 ± 12.8c 483 ± 19.0 1.82 ± 0.07ab 1.58 ± 0.07ba
T4 424.8 ± 21.3a 267.0 ± 13.2c 480 ± 17.5 1.80 ± 0.06a 1.58 ± 0.06ba
T5 420.0 ± 16.3a 268.7 ± 14.0c 483 ± 18.0 1.80 ± 0.08a 1.59 ± 0.05ac
T6 388.4 ± 16.4a 242.4 ± 12.3da 460 ± 19.0 1.90 ± 0.07bc 1.63 ± 0.04ac
T7 316.0 ± 16.1b 179.0 ± 11.0e 349 ± 16.5 1.95 ± 0.08c 1.66 ± 0.05c
Day 21 T0 819.0 ± 50.0a 401.2 ± 21.0a 674 ± 32.0 1.68 ± 0.06ab 1.62 ± 0.04a
T1 774.7 ± 27.0ab 383.0 ± 19.5 b 648 ± 29.0 1.69 ± 0.07ab 1.65 ± 0.06ab
T2 784.1 ± 54.0ab 377.8 ± 17.5 b 627 ± 28.0 1.66 ± 0.05a 1.63 ± 0.05a
T3 828.8 ± 70.0a 402.8 ± 18.0a 665 ± 27.5 1.65 ± 0.06a 1.61 ± 0.04a
T4 794.1 ± 28.0ab 369.5 ± 16.9c 609 ± 25.0 1.65 ± 0.04a 1.61 ± 0.06a
T5 783.5 ± 26.0ab 363.0 ± 16.4c 607 ± 24.5 1.67 ± 0.06ab 1.62 ± 0.04a
T6 703.5 ± 24.0bc 315.1 ± 15.0d 541 ± 26.8 1.74 ± 0.06bc 1.68 ± 0.05ab
T7 611.9 ± 24.0c 295.9 ± 13.8e 523 ± 24.5 1.77 ± 0.08c 1.71 ± 0.07 b
Day 28 T0 1315.0 ± 40a 496.0 ± 24.0a 808 ± 26.0 1.63 ± 0.05ab 1.62 ± 0.06ab
T1 1266.4 ± 36a 491.7 ± 24.8a 807 ± 27.0 1.64 ± 0.05ab 1.64 ± 0.07ab
T2 1274.4 ± 64a 490.3 ± 26.0a 800 ± 25.0 1.63 ± 0.06ab 1.63 ± 0.04ab
T3 1322.6 ± 61a 493.8 ± 25.5a 780 ± 24.5 1.58 ± 0.05b 1.60 ± 0.06a
T4 1277.5 ± 60a 483.4 ± 24.0a 778 ± 22.6 1.60 ± 0.07ab 1.60 ± 0.07a
T5 1250.4 ± 37b 466.9 ± 24.3b 779 ± 24.0 1.67 ± 0.06ab 1.64 ± 0.05ab
T6 1076.4 ± 57bc 372.9 ± 23.5c 624 ± 26.0 1.68 ± 0.07ca 1.68 ± 0.06b
T7 921.0 ± 47c 309.1 ± 22.5d 572 ± 25.0 1.85 ± 0.08d 1.75 ± 0.07c
Day 35 T0 1919.0 ± 39a 604.0 ± 35.0a 1056 ± 33.0 1.70 ± 0.07a 1.64 ± 0.05a
T1 1840.6 ± 36a 574.2 ± 29.5ab 993 ± 29.0 1.73 ± 0.07a 1.67 ± 0.05ab
T2 1871.0 ± 44a 596.6 ± 26.0a 1032 ± 35.0 1.73 ± 0.06a 1.66 ± 0.06ab
T3 1925.0 ± 41a 602.4 ± 28.0a 1036 ± 32.0 1.72 ± 0.05a 1.64 ± 0.04a
T4 1880.0 ± 61a 602.5 ± 32.0a 1043 ± 38.5 1.73 ± 0.07a 1.66 ± 0.05ab
T5 1808.0 ± 39a 557.6 ± 28.5bc 1003 ± 35.0 1.80 ± 0.08b 1.69 ± 0.07ab
T6 1623.0 ± 34b 548.6 ± 27.0bc 999 ± 38.0 1.82 ± 0.07bc 1.72 ± 0.07b
T7 1454.6 ± 63c 533.6 ± 25.0c 997 ± 28.0 1.87 ± 0.08c 1.80 ± 0.08c
Day 42 T0 2476.2 ± 33a 557.2 ± 28.0a 1131 ± 35.0 2.03 ± 0.09a 1.73 ± 0.07a
T1 2412.1 ± 37a 571.5 ± 26.5a 1171 ± 36.0 2.05 ± 0.08a 1.76 ± 0.08a
T2 2436.0 ± 62a 565.0 ± 24.0a 1164 ± 38.0 2.06 ± 0.09a 1.75 ± 0.08a
T3 2586.0 ± 57a 661.0 ± 29.5b 1348 ± 41.0 2.04 ± 0.07a 1.74 ± 0.07a
T4 2447.6 ± 64a 567.5 ± 26.5a 1191 ± 37.0 2.10 ± 0.08ab 1.75 ± 0.07a
T5 2352.8 ± 64a 544.8 ± 26.0a 1183 ± 33.0 2.17 ± 0.09b 1.79 ± 0.06ab
T6 2115.1 ± 57b 492.1 ± 24.5c 1082 ± 36.0 2.20 ± 0.09b 1.84 ± 0.05bc
T7 1944.2 ± 42b 489.6 ± 26.0c 1082 ± 37.0 2.21 ± 0.08b 1.90 ± 0.08c
  • Note. T0 = control 1 (without vaccination and without supplementation of N. sativa in diet), T1 = control 2 (T0+vaccination), T2 = T1 + N. sativa 0.5%, T3 = T1 + N. sativa 1%, T4 = T1 + N. sativa 2%, T5 = T1 + N. sativa 4%, T6 = T1 + N. sativa 8%, and T7 = T1 + N. sativa 16%. Different superscript letters in each column/week indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between groups, and NS stands for not significant (p > 0.05).
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of N. sativa on the weight of broilers: T0 = control 1 (without vaccination and without supplementation of N. sativa in diet), T1 = control 2 (T0 + vaccination), T2 = T1 + N. sativa 0.5%, T3 = T1+N. sativa 1%, T4 = T1 + N. sativa 2%, T5 = T1 + N. sativa 4%, T6 = T1 + N. sativa 8%, and T7 = T1 + N. sativa 16%. Different alphabetical letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between the means of the groups.

3.2. Immune Response

As shown in Figure 2, maternal antibody titer (MDA) of the chickens against ND decreased gradually and reached the points that are considered as negative in the control group T0 (environmental contamination control) on day 21 of age, and the comparison of average antibody titers of the groups during 2 weeks of age could be explained where maternal antibody of the chick’s yolk may contribute to MDA of chicks during 3 days of age, and reduction of the MDA starts on day 4 of age based on half-life time (4-5 days) in case of ND [42]. On the contrary, antibody titers of ND of the vaccinated chickens (group T1–T7) were increased after vaccination at the 14th day of the experiment. Different levels of N. sativa seeds in diet affected antibody titers against ND in the vaccinated groups and the chickens (group T3) fed with 1% N. sativa supplementation had the highest level of antibody titers, while chickens of group T7 (16% N. sativa seed in diet) had the lowest level of antibody titers on days 28, 35, and 42 of age (Figure 2). Weekly comparison of antibody titers of the groups revealed the following: (1) Differences among the groups were not significant (p < 0.05) on days 1, 7, and 14 of age, indicating that vaccination and N. sativa supplementation in feed did not strongly affect the MDA reduction rate of the chickens. (2) A significant difference (p < 0.05) between the unvaccinated and vaccinated groups on day 21 of age to the end of the experiment may indicate the effectiveness of the vaccination, while nearly undetectable antibody titers of unvaccinated chickens may confirm that there was no environmental or cross-contamination during the experimental period. (3) The lack of significant differences among the vaccinated groups on days 21, 28, and 35 of age may indicate that supplementation of different levels of N. sativa in diet affected the immune responses but did not have a strong effect on antibody titers of the treated groups, at least in a short period. Comparison antibody titers of the vaccinated groups at the end (day 42) of the experiment showed that antibody titers of group T3 (vaccinated and feed with a diet containing 1% N. sativa seeds) differed significantly (p = 0.027) from that of group T1 (vaccinated but feed without N. sativa seeds diet) and from those of group T6 (vaccinated and feed with diet containing 8% N. sativa seeds) and group T7 (vaccinated and feed with the diet containing 16% N. sativa seeds) significantly (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively) indicating effectiveness of different levels of N. sativa seeds supplementation in diets, as dietary inclusion of up to 1% N. sativa seeds had the best immunomodulatory effects on the level of antibody titer following vaccination.

Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of N. sativa on ND antibody titer of broilers: T0 = control 1 (without vaccination and without supplementation of N. sativa in diet), T1 = control 2 (T0 + vaccination), T2 = T1 +N. sativa 0.5%, T3 = T1 + N. sativa 1%, T4 = T1 + N. sativa 2%, T5 = T1 + N. sativa 4%, T6 = T1 + N. sativa 8%, and T7 = T1 + N. sativa 16%. Different alphabetical letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between the means of the groups.

3.3. Hemogram

As shown in Table 3, RBC and PCV as well as Hb values are age-dependent, and their values increased as the chickens get older. Weekly comparison of these parameters showed that supplementation of N. sativa seeds in the diet increases the values of RBC, PCV, and Hb, and the group of chickens fed with 16% supplemented N. sativa seeds had the highest values and significantly (p < 0.05) differed from those of control groups (T0 and T1) as well as those of the treated groups (T2-T4) indicating that increasing effects of N. sativa seeds on hemogram parameters are dose-dependent (Table 3).

Table 3. Effects of N. sativa on hemogram (mean ± SEM) of broiler chickens.
Age (day) Group RBC (×106) PCV (%) Hb (g/dl)
Day1 T0−T7 4.34 ± 0.029NS 24.2 ± 0.00NS 9.68 ± 0.047NS
Day 7 T0 5.00 ± 0.054a 27.2 ± 0.00a 10.98 ± 0.015a
T1 5.44 ± 0.024a 31.0 ± 0.00a 11.40 ± 0.044a
T2 5.5 ± 0.024a 31.8 ± 0.00a 11.64 ± 0.024a
T3 5.54 ± 0.024a 31.6 ± 0.00a 11.60 ± 0.044a
T4 5.52 ± 0.040a 30.6 ± 0.00a 11.20 ± 0.063a
T5 5.50 ± 0.019a 29.8 ± 0.00a 11.08 ± 0.051a
T6 5.46 ± 0.015a 29.3 ± 0.00a 10.92 ± 0.020a
T7 5.42 ± 0.048a 29.0 ± 0.00a 10.7 8 ± 0.020a
Day 14 T0 4.32 ± 0.048a 26.6 ± 0.00a 8.28 ± 0.074a
T1 4.34 ± 0.060a 26.8 ± 0.00ab 8.36 ± 0.021ab
T2 4.44 ± 0.024a 27.4 ± 0.00a 8.56 ± 0.067ab
T3 4.48 ± 0.020abc 27.8 ± 0.00b 8.70 ± 0.080b
T4 4.50 ± 0.067b 27.8 ± 0.00b 8.72 ± 0.019b
T5 4.54 ± 0.064bcd 28.0 ± 0.00bc 8.76 ± 0.015bc
T6 4.62 ± 0.073cb 28.6 ± 0.00cbd 8.96 ± 0.018bc
T7 4.76c ± 0.024d 29.6 ± 0.01d 9.28 ± 0.073d
Day 21 T0 4.62 ± 0.048a 28.6 ± 0.00a 8.98 ± 0.073a
T1 4.64 ± 0.060a 28.8 ± 0.00a 9.04 ± 0.019ab
T2 4.74 ± 0.024ab 29.4 ± 0.00ba 9.22 ± 0.073a
T3 4.78 ± 0.020ac 29.8 ± 0.00b 9.34 ± 0.060bcde
T4 4.80 ± 0.067bcd 29.8 ± 0.00bc 9.34 ± 0.018c
T5 4.84 ± 0.087bc 30.0 ± 0.00bcd 9.4 ± 0.016bcd
T6 4.94 ± 0.048cb 30.6 ± 0.00cbd 9.58 ± 0.014dce
T7 5.12 ± 0.031d 31.6 ± 0.00d 9.88 ± 0.073e
Day 28 T0 4.78 ± 0.024a 29.6 ± 0.00a 9.28 ± 0.073a
T1 4.80 ± 0.054ab 29.8 ± 0.00ab 9.30 ± 0.008ab
T2 4.88 ± 0.048ab 30.4 ± 0.00abc 9.52 ± 0.073abc
T3 4.96 ± 0.040ac 30.8 ± 0.00bc 9.64 ± 0.060bc
T4 4.98 ± 0.059bc 30.8 ± 0.00cd 9.64 ± 0.009cd
T5 5.00 ± 0.001bc 31.0 ± 0.00bcd 9.7 ± 0.007bcd
T6 5.10 ± 0.057cd 31.8 ± 0.00dce 9.88 ± 0.008dce
T7 5.26 ± 0.024db 32.6 ± 0.00edc 10.18 ± 0.073edc
Day 35 T0 5.12 ± 0.048a 31.6 ± 0.00a 9.88 ± 0.073a
T1 5.14 ± 0.060a 31.8 ± 0.00ab 9.94 ± 0.000ab
T2 5.24 ± 0.024 ab 32.4 ± 0.00abc 10.12 ± 0.073ab
T3 5.28 ± 0.020 abc 32.8 ± 0.00bcd 10.24 ± 0.060bcd
T4 5.30 ± 0.067bc 33.0 ± 0.00cd 10.24 ± 0.008c
T5 5.34 ± 0.074bcd 33.0 ± 0.00cbd 10.30 ± 0.007c
T6 5.42 ± 0.073cd 33.6 ± 0.00dc 10.48 ± 0.009dce
T7 5.56 ± 0.024dc 34.6 ± 0.00ed 10.78 ± 0.073ed
Day 42 T0 5.56 ± 0.024a 34.6 ± 0.01a 10.75 ± 0.07a
T1 5.60 ± 0.054abc 34.8 ± 0.01ab 10.86 ± 0.01abc
T2 5.68 ± 0.048ab 35.4 ± 0.01ab 11.06 ± 0.09abc
T3 5.76 ± 0.040abcd 35.8 ± 0.01bcd 11.20 ± 0.08bc
T4 5.78 ± 0.080bc 35.8 ± 0.01bc 11.22 ± 0.01bc
T5 5.80 ± 0.010bc 36.0 ± 0.01bc 11.26 ± 0.01bcd
T6 5.90 ± 0.080cd 36.6 ± 0.01cd 11.46 ± 0.01bcd
T7 6.06 ± 0.024d 37.6 ± 0.01dc 11.78 ± 0.07d
  • Note. RBCs: red blood cells, PCV: packed cell volume, and Hb: hemoglobin. T0 = control 1 (without vaccination and without supplementation of N. sativa in diet), T1 = control 2 (T0 + vaccination), T2 = T1 + N. sativa 0.5%, T3 = T1 + N. sativa 1%, T4 = T1 + N. sativa 2%, T5 = T1 + N. sativa 4%, T6 = T1 + N. sativa 8%, and T7 = T1 + N. sativa 16%. Different superscript letters in each column/week indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between groups, and NS stands for not significant (p > 0.05).

3.4. Leukogram

As shown in Table 4, WBC count of the vaccinated control 2 group (T1 = V + N−) was higher (p > 0.05) than that of the control 1 group (T0 = V−N−) from day 14 up to the end of the experiment indicating that WBC counts were affected by ND vaccination. Supplementation of N. sativa seeds affects leukogram parameters by decreasing WBC counts and lymphocytes and increasing heterophils, H/L ratio, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils percentages from day 21 of age until the end of the experiment. Weekly comparison (Table 4) of the groups indicates that the group (T7) fed with 16% N. sativa seeds had the lowest WBC counts and lymphocyte percentages and their differences with control 2 group (T1 = T0 + V) were significant (p = 0.013 and p = 0.008, respectively). But, values for H/L ratio and percentages of heterophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils of the group fed (T7) with 16% N. sativa seeds were the highest and their values differed from those of the control 2 group (T1 = T0 + V) significantly (p = 0.001).

Table 4. Effects of N. sativa on leukogram (mean ± SEM) of broiler chickens.
Age Group WBC (×103) Het (%) Lym (%) Het/Lymp Mon (%) Eos (%) Bas (%)
Day1 T0-T7 20.37 ± 0.18NS 37 ± 7NS 51.4 ± 7NS 0.94 ± 0NS 4 ± 0NS 6 ± 0NS 1.62 ± 0NS
Day 7 T0 29.1 ± 0.10a 30.0 ± 1a 55.0 ± 0.8a 0.54 ± 0.00a 4.8 ± 0.0acd 4.2 ± 0ac 6.02 ± 0a
T1 29.2 ± 0.20a 38.8 ± 1b 51.0 ± 1b 0.76 ± 0.00b 3.4 ± 0.0 b 3.22 ± 0b 3.62 ± 0b
T2 28.6 ± 0.21a 37.2 ± 1b 51.4 ± 0.5ab 0.72 ± 0.02b 4.0 ± 0.0ab 3.42 ± 0ab 4.02 ± 0b
T3 26.8 ± 0.12b 34.6 ± 1ba 52.8 ± 0.7ab 0.65 ± 0.02 b 4.2 ± 0.0abc 4.02 ± 0abc 4.42 ± 0bc
T4 25.0 ± 0.41b 31.2 ± 3ca 54.8 ± 0.0a 0.56 ± 0.03a 4.6 ± 0.0abc 4.42 ± 0c 5.02 ± 1cd
T5 24.2 ± 0.53b 27.2 ± 1cad 56.6 ± 1ca 0.48 ± 0.09a 5.0 ± 0.0c 4.62 ± 0 cd 5.62 ± 0da
T6 23.0 ± 0.10 cd 23.0 ± 2d 60.2 ± 1dc 0.38 ± 0.01c 5.4 ± 0.0 d 5.62 ± 0de 5.82 ± 1da
T7 21.0 ± 0.10 d 21.2 ± 4d 60.6 ± 2d 0.34 ± 0.00c 6.4 ± 0.0e 6.02 ± 0e 5.82 ± 0da
Day 14 T0 20.72 ± 0.48ab 47.0 ± 1a 46.0 ± 0.1a 1.02 ± 0.02a 3.7 ± 0a 2.2 ± 0a 1.62 ± 0a
T1 21.40 ± 0.50 a 45.8 ± 1a 45.8 ± 0.3a 1.00 ± 0.04a 3.8 ± 0a 2.82 ± 0a 1.82 ± 0a
T2 19.36 ± 0.72ab 43.2 ± 1ab 46.6 ± 0.5a 0.93 ± 0.02abc 4.4 ± 0ab 3.42 ± 0ab 2.42 ± 0ab
T3 18.82 ± 0.86bc 42.0 ± 1ba 46.6 ± 0.7a 0.89 ± 0.02b 4.82 ± 0bc 3.82 ± 0bc 2.82 ± 0bc
T4 18.43 ± 1.56bc 41.8 ± 3bc 46.6 ± 0.0a 0.89 ± 0.04bc 4.92 ± 0bc 3.82 ± 0bc 2.92 ± 0bc
T5 17.57 ± 0.74c 41.4 ± 1bc 46.6 ± 0.6a 0.88 ± 0.06bc 5.02 ± 0bc 4.02 ± 0bc 3.02 ± 0bc
T6 17.18 ± 1.24c 39.0 ± 2cd 47.2 ± 0.5b 0.82 ± 0.05cd 5.62 ± 0cd 4.62 ± 0 cd 3.62 ± 0 cd
T7 16.90 ± 0.58c 34.6 ± 4d 48.6 ± 0.8b 0.71 ± 0.02d 6.62 ± 0d 5.62 ± 0d 4.62 ± 0d
Day 21 T0 22.70 ± 0.04ab 33.6 ± 0a 52.6 ± 0a 0.64 ± 0.01a 4.62 ± 0a 6.62 ± 0a 2.62 ± 0a
T1 22.95 ± 0.05a 33.8 ± 0a 51.8 ± 1a 0.65 ± 0.02a 4.82 ± 0ab 6.82 ± 0ab 2.82 ± 0ab
T2 20.91 ± 0.07abc 34.4 ± 0ab 49.4 ± 0ab 0.69 ± 0.02a 5.42 ± 0abc 7.42 ± 0abc 3.42 ± 0abc
T3 20.37 ± 0.08bcd 34.6 ± 0bd 48.6 ± 0b 0.71 ± 0.01ab 5.62 ± 0bc 7.62 ± 0b 3.62 ± 0bc
T4 20.12 ± 0.10cbd 34.8 ± 0bd 47.8 ± 1bd 0.73 ± 0.03ab 5.82 ± 0cd 7.82 ± 0cd 3.82 ± 0cd
T5 19.98 ± 0.07cbd 35.0 ± 0cb 47.0 ± 2cb 0.74 ± .04ab 6.02 ± 0cd 8.02 ± 0cd 4.02 ± 0cd
T6 18.73 ± 0.12cd 35.6 ± 0dc 44.6 ± 2dce 0.80 ± 0.04bc 6.62 ± 0d 8.62 ± 0d 4.62 ± 0d
T7 18.45 ± .05d 36.6 ± 0e 40.6 ± 0e 0.90 ± 0.02c 7.6 ± 0 e 9.62 ± 0e 5.62 ± 0e
Day 28 T0 23.80 ± 0.04a 37.6 ± 0a 45.6 ± 0a 0.82 ± 0.02a 5.62 ± 0a 7.62 ± 0a 3.62 ± 0a
T1 24.50 ± 0.05ab 37.8 ± 0a 44.8 ± 1a 0.84 ± 0.03a 5.72 ± 0ab 7.92 ± 0a 3.82 ± 0a
T2 22.46 ± 0.07abc 38.4 ± 0ab 42.4 ± 0ab 0.90 ± 0.02ab 6.42 ± 0abc 8.32 ± 0ab 4.52 ± 0ab
T3 21.90 ± 0.08abc 38.5 ± 0ab 41.6 ± 0b 0.92 ± 0.02ab 6.62 ± 0bcd 8.52 ± 0ab 4.82 ± 0bc
T4 21.67 ± 0.01ac 38.8 ± 0bc 40.6 ± 2b 0.95 ± 0.05ab 6.82 ± 0cd 8.92 ± 0bc 4.92 ± 0bc
T5 21.53 ± 0.07c 39.0 ± 0bc 40.0 ± 2b 0.97 ± 0.06ab 7.02 ± 0dcd 9.02 ± 0bc 5.02 ± 0bc
T6 20.28 ± 0.12dc 39.6 ± 0c 37.6 ± 2cd 1.05 ± 0.07bc 7.52 ± 0d 9.62 ± 0 cd 5.72 ± 0c
T7 20.00 ± 0.05dc 40.6 ± 0d 33.6 ± 0d 1.20 ± 0.04c 8.52 ± 0e 10.42 ± 0d 6.92 ± 0d
Day 35 T0 25.57 ± 0.04ab 35.4 ± 0a 57.8 ± 0a 0.61 ± 0.01a 3.62 ± 0a 2.52 ± 0a 0.72 ± 0a
T1 26.25 ± 0.05a 35.8 ± 0ab 56.8 ± 1ab 0.63 ± 0.02ab 3.92 ± 0ab 2.72 ± 0ab 0.82 ± 0ab
T2 24.21 ± 0.07 abc 36.3 ± 0ab 54.5 ± 0abc 0.66 ± 0.01ab 4.32 ± 0abc 3.52 ± 0abc 1.42 ± 0abc
T3 23.67 ± 0.08abc 36.5 ± 0bc 53.8 ± 0bc 0.68 ± 0.01ab 4.62 ± 0bc 3.52 ± 0bc 1.62 ± 0abc
T4 23.42 ± 0.10bc 36.8 ± 0c 52.7 ± 1c 0.70 ± 0.03abc 4.82 ± 0bcd 3.92 ± 0cd 1.82 ± 0cd
T5 23.28 ± 0.07bc 37.0 ± 0c 52.0 ± 2c 0.71 ± 0.04abc 5.02 ± 0cd 4.02 ± 0cd 2.02 ± 0cd
T6 22.03 ± 0.12c 37.6 ± 0d 49.7 ± 2d 0.76 ± 0.04bc 5.52 ± 0d 4.62 ± 0d 2.62 ± 0de
T7 21.72 ± 0.05c 38.6 ± 0e 45.7 ± 0e 0.84 ± 0.02c 6.62 ± 0e 5.62 ± 0e 3.52 ± 0e
Day 42 T0 27.12 ± 0.04ab 33.6± ± 0a 54.7 ± 0a 0.61 ± 0.01a 3.62 ± 0a 5.52 ± 0a 2.62 ± 0a
T1 27.80 ± 0.05a 33.8± ± 0ab 53.9 ± 1ab 0.63 ± 0.02ab 3.82 ± 0ab 5.72 ± 0ab 2.82 ± 0ab
T2 25.76 ± 0.07abc 34.4± ± 0abc 51.5 ± 0abc 0.66 ± 0.01ab 4.32 ± 0abc 6.42 ± 0abc 3.42 ± 0abc
T3 25.22 ± 0.08abc 34.6 ± 0bc 50.6 ± 0bc 0.68 ± 0.01abc 4.62 ± 0bcd 6.52 ± 0bc 3.72 ± 0bcd
T4 24.83 ± 0.10bc 34.9 ± 0cd 49.7 ± 1bcd 0.70 ± 0.03abc 4.82 ± 0cd 6.82 ± 0cd 3.82 ± 0cd
T5 24.67 ± 0.07bc 35.0 ± 0cd 49.0 ± 2cd 0.71 ± 0.04bc 5.02 ± 0cd 7.02 ± 0cd 4.02 ± 0cd
T6 23.58 ± 0.12c 35.6 ± 0d 46.7 ± 2d 0.76 ± 0.04c 5.52 ± 0d 7.62 ± 0d 4.62 ± 0d
T7 23.30 ± 0.05c 36.6 ± 0e 42.5 ± 0e 0.86 ± 0.02d 6.62 ± 0e 8.72 ± 0e 5.62 ± 0e
  • Note. WBC: white blood cells, Het: heterophils, Lym: lymphocytes, H/L: heterophils to lymphocytes ratio, Mon: monocytes, Eos: eosinophils, and Bas: basophils. T0 = control 1 (without vaccination and without supplementation of N. sativa in diet), T1 = control 2 (T0 + vaccination), T2 = T1 + N. sativa 0.5%, T3 = T1 + N. sativa 1%, T4 = T1 + N. sativa 2%, T5 = T1 + N. sativa 4%, T6 = T1 + N. sativa 8%, and T7 = T1 + N. sativa 16%. Different superscript letters in each column/week indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between groups, and NS stands for not significant (p > 0.05).

3.5. Biochemical Parameters

3.5.1. Albumin and Total Protein

The concentration of albumin and total protein of control chickens increased during 6 weeks of the experimental period indicating that these parameters are age-dependent. A weekly comparison of the groups (Table 5) showed that supplementation of up to 2% of N. sativa seeds in the diet increases serum level of these parameters whereas 4% and over that decrease concentrations of these elements in the serum of broiler chickens. Overall, albumin and total protein levels of chickens fed with a diet containing different N. sativa seeds were higher than those of the control groups (T0-T1) and the differences were significant (p < 0.05) when compared with those of the control groups (T0-T1).

3.5.2. Glucose

As shown in Table 5, weekly comparison of the control groups (T0-T1) revealed that the serum glucose concentration of the chickens is decreased by age, and vaccination against ND did not affect its level. A weekly comparison of the treated groups indicated that the effects of N. sativa on serum glucose were dose-dependent. On the other hand, increasing the effect on serum glucose of the chickens was observed by 0.5 to 2% of N. sativa seed supplementation in diet, while serum glucose of the chickens fed with 4% and over that decreased gradually (Table 5). Overall, the chickens fed with different concentrations of N. sativa seeds in the feed had higher glucose level than those of the control groups (T0-T1), and a weekly comparison of the serum glucose level of the groups showed that on age 14 up to the end of the experiment, chickens of the group (T4) fed with 2% N. sativa diet had the highest level of serum glucose and differences between the groups were significant (p < 0.05).

Table 5. Effects of N. sativa on biochemical parameters (Mean ± SEM) of broilers.
Age (day) Group Alb (g/dL) TP (g/dL) Glu (mg/dL) Cal (mg/dL) Phos (mg/dL)
Day1 T0–T7 0.62 ± 0.03NS 1.73 ± 0.10NS 276 ± 7.5NS 8.19 ± 0.07NS 2.09 ± 0.02NS
Day 7 T0 0.74 ± 0.05a 1.85 ± 0.10a 220.6 ± 304ad 8.0 ± 0.03a 3.03 ± 0.04a
T1 0.72 ± 0.02a 1.86 ± 0.02a 216.0 ± 0.94a 8.06 ± 0.05a 30.8 ± 0.12a
T2 0.76 ± 0.02a 1.87 ± 0.03ab 225.0 ± 2.56abd 8.26 ± 0.04a 3.52 ± 0.06b
T3 0.78 ± 0.03a 2.06 ± 0.06b 232.8 ± 1.99bc 8.36 ± 0.11b 3.66 ± 0.08bc
T4 0.84 ± 0.03a 2.06 ± 0.10b 240.4 ± 0.52b 9.60 ± 0.05c 3.78 ± 0.08c
T5 0.80 ± 0.05a 1.96 ± 0.06 b 230.4 ± 2.88cd 8.18 ± 0.03ab 3.74 ± 0.04cb
T6 0.70 ± 0.01a 1.78 ± 0.05ab 227.0 ± 1.86db 7.52 ± 0.04ad 3.71 ± 0.09cb
T7 0.68 ± 0.03a 1.74 ± 0.08a 221.4 ± 2.04ad 7.25 ± 0.05d 3.61 ± 0.05cb
Day 14 T0 0.74 ± 0.07a 2.14 ± 0.05a 221.8 ± 1.93ad 8.50 ± 0.14a 3.26 ± 0.08a
T1 0.68 ± 0.07a 1.92 ± 0.08abc 217.6 ± 2.18a 8.48 ± 0.16a 3.14 ± 0.03a
T2 0.70 ± 0.05a 1.96 ± 0.15abc 239.4 ± 1.24b 8.90 ± 0.06a 3.40 ± 0.06b
T3 0.72 ± 0.05a 2.04 ± 0.12abc 246.8 ± 3.39bc 9.06 ± 0.04a 3.48 ± 0.05b
T4 0.80 ± 0.0a 2.26 ± 0.14a 254.6 ± 1.03c 9.06 ± 0.08b 3.86 ± 0.07c
T5 0.70 ± 0.07a 1.90 ± 0.14abc 250.0 ± 3.56c 7.44 ± 0.12c 3.50 ± 0.06b
T6 0.68 ± 0.06a 1.86 ± 0.08ab 244.2 ± 3.42bc 7.24 ± 0.16c 3.02 ± 0.05a
T7 0.64 ± 0.04a 1.68 ± 0.13cb 227.4 ± 3.50d 6.94 ± 0.13c 3.10 ± 0.04a
Day 21 T0 0.94 ± 0.07a 2.34 ± 0.08a 220.8 ± 1.9ad 8.24 ± 0.16a 3.30 ± 0.07a
T1 0.72 ± 0.07a 2.08 ± 0.10abc 224.2 ± 2.1ad 8.18 ± 0.16b 3.20 ± 0.06a
T2 0.94 ± 0.05a 2.12 ± 0.17abc 251.2 ± 1.2b 9.50 ± 0.06b 3.66 ± 0.03 b
T3 0.98 ± 0.05a 2.22 ± 0.12abc 269.0 ± 2.3c 9.66 ± 0.04b 3.80 ± 0.02c
T4 1.0 ± 0.05a 2.46 ± 0.16a 276.6 ± 1.0c 10.98 ± 0.08c 3.92 ± 0.03c
T5 0.90 ± 0.07a 2.06 ± 0.15abc 272.0 ± 2.5c 7.96 ± 0.14a 3.62 ± 0.05b
T6 0.88 ± 0.06a 1.98 ± 0.10 b 269.2 ± 2.4c 7.76 ± 0.16a 3.14 ± 0.08ad
T7 0.88 ± 0.04a 1.80 ± 0.15cb 224.4 ± 3.5d 7.47 ± 0.13a 3.00 ± 0.05 d
Day 28 T0 1.34 ± 0.07a 2.53 ± 0.10a 209.8 ± 1.9a 8.44 ± 0.16a 3.38 ± 0.05a
T1 1.34 ± 0.07a 2.56 ± 0.10a 213.6 ± 2.1a 8.36 ± 0.16a 3.30 ± 0.08a
T2 1.60 ± 0.05b 3.08 ± 0.10bcd 260.2 ± 1.2b 9.80 ± 0.08b 3.70 ± 0.03b
T3 1.62 ± 0.05b 3.18 ± 0.09bcd 278.0 ± 2.3c 9.96 ± 0.04b 3.90 ± 0.02c
T4 1.80 ± 0.05c 3.40 ± 0.10b 285.6 ± 1.0c 11.08 ± 0.08c 4.02 ± 0.03c
T5 1.68 ± 0.07bc 3.18 ± 0.10bcd 281.0 ± 2.6c 8.26 ± 0.14ad 3.72 ± 0.05b
T6 1.68 ± 0.06bc 3.04 ± 0.10cd 278.2 ± 2.4c 8.06 ± 0.16ad 3.24 ± 0.08ad
T7 1.58 ± 0.04b 3.00 ± 0.08dc 228.0 ± 2.5d 7.76 ± 0.13d 3.10 ± 0.05d
Day 35 T0 1.54 ± 0.07a 2.94 ± 0.12a 203.8 ± 1.93a 8.54 ± 0.16a 3.40 ± 0.07a
T1 1.54 ± 0.07a 2.94 ± 0.12a 211.6 ± 2.18a 8.68 ± 0.16a 3.32 ± 0.06a
T2 1.70 ± 0.05ab 3.24 ± 0.11abc 255.2 ± 1.24b 9.90 ± 0.06bc 3.76 ± 0.03b
T3 1.82 ± 0.06b 3.36 ± 0.11bc 273.0 ± 3.39c 10.05 ± 0.04bc 4.00 ± 0.02c
T4 1.88 ± 0.05b 3.56 ± 0.10b 280.6 ± 1.02c 10.38 ± 0.08c 4.04 ± 0.04c
T5 1.78 ± 0.07bc 3.44 ± 0.12bc 272.0 ± 3.56c 8.36 ± 0.14a 3.74 ± 0.05b
T6 1.72 ± 0.06ab 3.22 ± 0.11abc 259.2 ± 3.42db 8.16 ± 0.16ad 3.26 ± 0.05ad
T7 1.68 ± 0.06ac 3.18 ± 0.11ca 204.4 ± 3.50ea 7.80 ± 0.14d 3.14 ± 0.06d
Day 42 T0 1.74 ± 0.07a 3.24 ± 0.12a 180.8 ± 1.92a 8.92 ± 0.1a 3.60 ± 0.08a
T1 1.72 ± 0.07a 3.22 ± 0.12a 194.6 ± 2.17b 9.14 ± 0.2a 3.52 ± 0.06a
T2 1.92 ± 0.06abc 3.54 ± 0.11abc 232.2 ± 3.38c 11.68 ± 0.1b 3.96 ± 0.04b
T3 2.02 ± 0.05bc 3.66 ± 0.10bc 250.0 ± 1.12d 11.86 ± 0.1b 4.20 ± 0.03c
T4 2.08 ± 0.06 b 3.86 ± 0.12b 257.6 ± 3.56d 12.06 ± 0.1b 4.24 ± 0.04c
T5 1.98 ± 0.07bc 3.74 ± 0.11bc 243.6 ± 3.42d 9.92 ± 0.2c 3.94 ± 0.05 b
T6 1.90 ± 0.06abc 3.52 ± 0.11abc 238.2 ± 2.50c 9.72 ± 0.1c 3.46 ± 0.06a
T7 1.85 ± 0.05ac 3.48 ± 0.11ac 198.0 ± 1.12b 9.36 ± 0.1da 3.34 ± 0.06da
  • Note. Alb: albumin, TP: total protein, Glu: glucose, Cal: calcium, and Ph: phosphorous. T0 = control 1 (without vaccination and without supplementation of N. sativa in diet), T1 = control 2 (T0 + vaccination), T2 = T1 + N. sativa 0.5%, T3 = T1 + N. sativa 1%, T4 = T1 + N. sativa 2%, T5 = T1 + N. sativa 4%, T6 = T1 + N. sativa 8%, and T7 = T1 + N. sativa 16%. Different superscript letters in each column/week indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between groups, and NS stands for not significant (p > 0.05).

3.5.3. Calcium and Phosphorus

As shown in Table 5, supplementation of up to 2% of N. sativa seeds in diet had increasing effects on levels of serum calcium and phosphorus, while 4% and over that had decreasing effects. Chickens fed with 2% of N. sativa seeds in the diet had the highest level of serum calcium and phosphorus that significantly (p < 0.05) differed from those of the control groups (T0 and T1).

3.5.4. Cholesterol and Triglyceride

As shown in Table 6, high levels of cholesterol and triglyceride due to yolk residue reduced sharply in the 1st week, and then their levels reduced gradually during the experimental period, indicating that their concentrations are age-dependent at least in broilers up to 42 days of age. Weekly comparison of N. sativa treated and control groups showed that inclusion of N. sativa seeds in broiler’s diets reduces the concentration of both these parameters, and chickens of group T7 fed with 16% N. sativa seeds had the lowest level and differed significantly (p < 0.05) from those of the control groups (T0-T1).

Table 6. Effects of N. sativa on biochemical parameters (Mean ± SEM) of broilers.
Age (day) Group Chol (mg/dL) Trigl (mg/dL) ALP (U/L) ALT (U/L) AST (U/L)
Day1 T0–T7 304.9 ± 6.7NS 179.825 ± 5.1NS 12.03 ± 0.17NS 7.9 ± 0.3NS 218.4 ± 2.6NS
Day 7 T0 154.8 ± 2.7a 137.0 ± 2.7a 10.38 ± 0.12a 9.2 ± 0.3a 241.2 ± 2.3a
T1 155.2 ± 1.9a 132.0 ± 1.8b 10.28 ± 0.22a 9.6 ± 0.4a 246.8 ± 2.6a
T2 156.2 ± 1.6a 115.8 ± 2.0c 10.03 ± 0.13a 9.8 ± 0.3a 237.6 ± 2.4b
T3 157.2 ± 1.5a 115.4 ± 2.1c 9.94 ± 0.10a 10.6 ± 0.4b 236.8 ± 2.5b
T4 155.4 ± 1.2a 112.4 ± 2.1c 9.92 ± 0.10a 11.2 ± 0.5b 233.8 ± 2.8bc
T5 155.8 ± 1.5a 107.2 ± 1.9d 9.91 ± 0.13a 11.0 ± 0.3b 228.4 ± 2.4cd
T6 154.0 ± 1.7a 105.8 ± 2.0d 9.91 ± 0.10a 9.2 ± 0.3a 227.6 ± 2.6d
T7 154.6 ± 1.3a 103.4 ± 2.4d 9.82 ± 0.10a 8.0 ± 0.4c 227.0 ± 2.2d
Day 14 T0 154.4 ± 1.3a 173.2 ± 3.4a 8.96 ± 0.14a 9.7 ± 0.4ac 234.6 ± 2.4a
T1 150.4 ± 2.4a 172.0 ± 2.7a 8.98 ± 0.20a 9.6 ± 0.3ac 234.0 ± 2.5a
T2 151.6 ± 1.7a 167.4 ± 3.1b 8.78 ± 0.10ab 10.0 ± 0.5a 230.0 ± 2.5a
T3 150.4 ± 1.5a 166.2 ± 2.9b 8.58 ± 0.10ab 10.0 ± 0.5a 224.2 ± 2.8b
T4 153.2 ± 3.1a 161.2 ± 3.5c 8.74 ± 0.10ab 11.6 ± 0.6b 194.8 ± 2.9c
T5 153.4 ± 1.9a 157.6 ± 3.7c 8.58 ± 0.16ab 9.8 ± 0.5a 181.6 ± 2.6d
T6 154.8 ± 2.5a 151.8 ± 3.1c 8.50 ± 0.10ab 9.6 ± 0.4ac 178.4 ± 2.6d
T7 151.0 ± 3.1a 145.0 ± 3.7d 8.42 ± 0.11b 9.2 ± 0.7c 149.4 ± 2.3e
Day 21 T0 167.4 ± 2.3a 163.2 ± 3.4a 6.98 ± 0.14ab 10.0 ± 0.4ab 215.6 ± 2.3a
T1 165.6 ± 3.3a 165.0 ± 2.7a 7.02 ± 0.20a 10.6 ± 0.3a 215.2 ± 2.5a
T2 163.4 ± 1.5abc 164.4 ± 4.2a 6.82 ± 0.10abc 11.0 ± 0.7a 206.6 ± 2.3ab
T3 161.4 ± 2.9abc 160.4 ± 2.9a 6.78 ± 0.10abc 11.2 ± 0.5a 200.2 ± 2.2 b
T4 160.8 ± 1.9abc 160.2 ± 4.5ab 6.60 ± 0.18abc 11.2 ± 0.6a 199.4 ± 2.3 b
T5 160.6 ± 1.9abc 158.0 ± 4.7 b 6.58 ± 0.10abc 9.8 ± 0.5 b 190.4 ± 2.9bc
T6 158.8 ± 2.5bc 151.6 ± 5.1c 6.54 ± 0.10bc 9.6 ± 0.4b 178.0 ± 2.2c
T7 157.0 ± 2.4c 144.4 ± 3.7d 6.44 ± 0.10c 8.2 ± 0.7c 148.8 ± 2.6d
Day 28 T0 156.4 ± 2.2a 159.2 ± 3.7a 6.34 ± 0.13a 10.2 ± 0.2a 191.6 ± 2.2a
T1 154.4 ± 2.3a 159.4 ± 2.7a 6.38 ± 0.20a 10.2 ± 0.2a 194.0 ± 2.3a
T2 154.4 ± 2.1a 156.4 ± 3.4ab 6.18 ± 0.10ab 10.8 ± 0.2a 184.0 ± 2.3b
T3 154.2 ± 1.5a 152.8 ± 3.1b 6.12 ± 0.10ab 11.0 ± 0.1b 181.2 ± 2.8b
T4 154.4 ± 2.9a 147.4 ± 2.9b 5.98 ± 0.10abc 11.6 ± 0.2b 175.8 ± 2.9cb
T5 148.6 ± 2.5b 138.4 ± 3.5c 5.92 ± 0.15abc 10.4 ± 0.2bac 170.6 ± 2.8c
T6 148.4 ± 2.4b 131.6 ± 3.7d 5.88 ± 0.08bc 10.0 ± 0.2bac 164.4 ± 2.8 d
T7 144.0 ± 2.4b 128.0 ± 4.1d 5.66 ± 0.09c 9.80 ± 0.1c 138.4 ± 2.2e
Day 35 T0 150.4 ± 2.3a 153.2 ± 3.7a 5.54 ± 0.13a 10.6 ± 0.1a 182.6 ± 2.4a
T1 149.4 ± 3.3a 150.0 ± 3.4ab 5.58 ± 0.20a 10.2 ± 0.2a 182.2 ± 2.2a
T2 149.6 ± 3.1a 147.8 ± 2.7b 5.38 ± 0.08ab 10.2 ± 0.2a 171.0 ± 2.8 b
T3 145.4 ± 2.9ab 142.8 ± 2.1bc 5.32 ± 0.10ab 10.4 ± 0.1a 165.6 ± 2.8bc
T4 145.8 ± 2.5ab 138.4 ± 2.9 cd 5.18 ± 0.09abc 11.8 ± 0.2b 162.8 ± 2.5cd
T5 144.8 ± 2.4ab 133.0 ± 2.5de 5.12 ± 0.15abc 10.0 ± 0.2a 157.4 ± 2.7d
T6 139.8 ± 2.2bc 130.2 ± 2.7e 5.08 ± 0.08bc 10.0 ± 0.1a 141.4 ± 2.7e
T7 136.0 ± 2.3c 126.2 ± 2.1 4.84 ± 0.08c 9.0 ± 0.1c 133.4 ± 2.0e
Day 42 T0 136.4 ± 2.1a 132.2 ± 3.4a 5.14 ± 0.13a 10.8 ± 0.1a 144.6 ± 2.5a
T1 135.4 ± 1.5a 132.0 ± 2.7a 5.16 ± 0.20a 10.6 ± 0.2a 144.2 ± 2.4a
T2 133.4 ± 1.9a 127.2 ± 2.1ab 4.98 ± 0.06ab 10.6 ± 0.2a 133.0 ± 2.4 b
T3 130.8 ± 1.9a 124.4 ± 2.9 bc 4.92 ± 0.10ab 10.8 ± 0.2a 127.6 ± 2.8bc
T4 129.6 ± 2.3a 123.4 ± 2.5bc 4.74 ± 0.09abc 12.0 ± 0.1b 124.8 ± 2.9c
T5 121.2 ± 2.4b 121.6 ± 2.7c 4.72 ± 0.15abc 10.0 ± 0.3c 119.4 ± 2.8c
T6 117.8 ± 1.5b 114.4 ± 2.1de : 9.4 ± 0.2c 103.4 ± 2.9d
T7 108.0 ± 2.9c 110.6 ± 3.7e 4.48 ± 0.08c 8.8 ± 0.2d 95.4 ± 2.2d
  • Note. Chol: cholesterol, Trigl: triglyceride, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, ALT: alanine transaminase, and AST: aspartate transaminase. T0 = control 1 (without vaccination and without supplementation of N. sativa in diet), T1 = control 2 (T0 + vaccination), T2 = T1 + N. sativa 0.5%, T3 = T1 + N. sativa 1%, T4 = T1 + N. sativa 2%, T5 = T1 + N. sativa 4%, T6 = T1 + N. sativa 8%, and T7 = T1+N. sativa 16%. Different superscript letters in each column/week indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between groups, and NS stands for not significant (p > 0.05).

3.5.5. Serum Enzymes (ALP, ALT, and AST)

As shown in Table 6, the lack of significant differences between group T0 and group T1 indicates that vaccination does not affect the serum enzyme levels, and levels of both ALP and AST were decreased by age, while those of ALT were increased. Weekly comparison (Table 6) of the groups revealed the following. (a) The levels of ALP decreased by the inclusion of N. sativa seeds in the diet during the experimental period and group T7 had the lowest levels of ALP which significantly (p < 0.05) differed from those of control groups (T0-T1) from age 14 to 42 days. (b) Inclusion of up to 2% of N. sativa seeds in the diet increased the levels of ALT while 8% and over that decreased levels of ALT. Therefore, group T4 (2% N. sativa) had the highest level of ALT and group T7 (16% N. sativa) had the lowest level of ALT. The mean differences between the control groups with groups T4 (2% N. sativa) and T7 (16% N. sativa) were significant (p < 0.05) on days 28, 35, and 42 of age). The level of AST is decreased gradually during the experimental period. Weekly comparison (Table 6) of the groups revealed that the decreasing effect of N. sativa on the AST level is dose-dependent and group T7 had the lowest levels during the whole experimental period. As shown in Table 6, the mean differences of the groups T6 (8%) and T7 (16%) significantly (p < 0.05) differed from those of the rest groups on day 21of age to the end of the experimental period.

4. Discussion

4.1. Performance

Comparison of the vaccinated group (T1) with the unvaccinated group (T0) indicated that vaccination had a little (p > 0.05) adverse effect on weight gains of the chickens as expected due to vaccination stress. As shown in Figure 1, our results about the efficacy of N. sativa supplementation on the performance of broiler chickens are in agreement with the results obtained by Miraghaee et al. [24], Ghasemi et al. [38], Hossain et al. [39], and Ali et al. [47] who reported that 1% N. sativa seeds in diet improved the performance of broiler chickens but there are some differences between our results with those obtained by Shewita and Taha [37] who observed a higher weight in chickens fed with 2% N. sativa seed supplementation diet when compared with the weight of those that received 10% of N. sativa seeds in their diet, or Durrani et al. [36] who reported a higher weight gain in 40 g/kg (4%) of N. sativa seeds in the diet. Overall, most studies indicate that a higher percentage of N. sativa seeds in the diet may reduce feed intake and finally affects the average weight of broiler chickens as observed in this study (Table 2) for groups T6 (8% N. sativa seeds) and T7 (16% N. sativa seeds), and the mean of the latest differed significantly (p < 0.05) from those of the control (T0-T1) groups (Figure 1).

4.2. Immune Response

The lack of an increase in antibody titer of chickens of the unvaccinated group (T0) during the experimental period confirmed that no environmental or cross-contamination has occurred. Lack of significant differences among treated groups during days 1–14 of age indicates that supplementation of N. sativa seeds on diet had no significant effects on MDA reduction of the chickens. A significant (p = 0.04) difference between antibody titers of group T3 and group T1 indicates that dietary inclusion of 1% N. sativa seeds had the highest immunomodulatory effects, while that of group T7 (16% N. sativa seeds) had immunosuppressive effects. The results observed during this study (Figure 2) indicate that N. sativa is able to promote antibody response (mostly IgG) in chickens as previously reported [5, 17, 29, 36, 47, 48]. Higher antibody titers (log 2–7.4) of chickens (group T3) observed during this study are in the range of expected titers that could be induced via vaccinations by two live plus one killed vaccines [49, 50]. Our results about the efficacy of different levels of N. sativa seeds in the diet on immune responses of chickens also is in harmony with the results obtained by Hossain et al. [39] who reported that supplementation of 1% N. sativa seeds in a broiler diet improved the development of immunity but is in disagreement with the results obtained by Khan et al. [51]. However, our observation on antibody titers is in disagreement with those of Shewita and Taha [37] and Ghasemi et al. [38] who reported that 20 g/Kg of N. sativa had the highest immunomodulatory effects, and this inconsistency could be attributed to the lack of 1% concentration in their work. Our observation on a decrease in lymphocytes percentage together with an increase in antibody titers following vaccination against Newcastle diseases is controversial to the results obtained by Islam et al. [52] who reported a decrease in antibody titer together with a rise in peripheral lymphocytes with an explanation that the numbers of antigen-specific-antibody secreting B-cells were less. As recent reports indicated that N. sativa has induced a significant increase in antibody titers against Newcastle disease (ND) and infectious bursal disease (IBD) in broilers [29, 36], therefore, the reasons for this controversy results may be due to the nature of pathogenic agents, type of treatments (vaccination versus challenge), kind of experimental animal, different components and dosage of N. sativa, and the role of macrophages in the activation of Th2 cells and their roles in the activation of B-cells for further differentiation into plasma cells. For example, the increase in antibody titer against avian infectious bronchitis (IB) has been observed by Durrani et al. [36] but has not been observed by Al-Beitawi et al. [29] or various dosages of N. sativa had different effects on antibody titers against different pathogenic agents (ND, IBD, and IB) in same experimental animals “broiler chickens” [36].

4.3. Hemogram

As shown in Table 3, the lack of significant (p > 0.05) differences between hemogram values of the control 1 (T0) and those of control 2 (T1) groups indicates that vaccination alone did not significantly influence the hemograms. The results (Table 3) obtained during this study in regard to values of some hematological parameters (RBC, PCV, and Hb) in broiler chickens are in agreement with those previously reported [53].

4.4. Leukogram

Our results (Table 4) on the reduction effects of N. sativa on leukocyte counts of the chickens are in agreement with previous reports [54, 55]. The results obtained during this study revealed that supplementation of N. sativa seeds in broiler’s diet increased the H/L ratio (Table 4), and our results are in disagreement with the results obtained by Ali et al. [26] who reported that supplementation of 1% N. sativa may reduce the heterophil/lymphocyte (H/L) ratio. An increase in eosinophil values observed during this study (Table 4) is in line with the results obtained by Ahmad et al. [13] who reported that N. sativa rises peripheral blood lymphocytes and eosinophils in Long-Evans rats. It has been documented that monocytes-macrophages play an indispensable role in the immune system [55] and an increase in their numbers may indicate the immunomodulatory effects of N. sativa.

4.5. Biochemical Parameters

In general, biochemical parameters of poultry may be influenced by various factors and the results of this study on biochemical parameters (Table 5) were compared with reported reference ranges [4042, 5658].

4.5.1. Albumin and Total Protein

As shown in Table 5, alternation on concentrations of albumin and total protein of the chickens fed with N. sativa seeds observed during this study have also been reported by Miraghaee et al. [24]. However, weekly comparison (Table 5) values of total protein and albumin of the treated groups showed that differences among the groups were not significant (p > 0.05) as previously reported [42, 59] but in disagreement with the results observed by Singh and Kumar [41]. As shown in Table 5, increasing of protein and albumin concentrations of the chickens fed with 0.5–2% and decreasing of those chickens fed with 4–16% N. sativa may indicate that the efficacy of N. sativa on protein and albumin concentrations is dose-dependent.

4.5.2. Glucose

The results obtained during this study (Table 5) on the level of serum glucose of chickens are in agreement with recent reports [29, 40] but in disagreement with other reports [41, 42]. Some controversial observations could be explained where the type of the extract, whole seed, and duration of consumption may exert different effects on glucose level as has been observed by Mohtashami [60] who reported that N. sativa did not significantly affect the fasting blood glucose level but significantly decreased its levels during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) when compared to diabetic control by affecting the time course of glucose absorption from the intestine.

4.5.3. Calcium and Phosphorus

The results obtained for calcium and phosphorus during this study (Table 5) are in agreement with previous reports that supplementation of N. sativa in the feed of broiler diets significantly increases the level of serum calcium [61,62] because N. sativa possesses estrogenic activity in regulating calcium-regulating hormones [61].

4.5.4. Cholesterol and Triglyceride

Because of yolk sac in day-old chicks, the concentration of both cholesterol and triglyceride were very high at the beginning of the experiment, but as shown in Table 6, by aging, their values reduced, and their levels in the control groups at age 42 days were in the range as previously reported [63]. The results obtained during this study on the serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels of broiler chickens are in agreement with previous reports that N. sativa reduces serum cholesterols of chickens [21, 24, 29, 3740, 47], in particular HDL cholesterol [26]. The reduction in serum cholesterol and triglycerides has been attributed to the lowering effect of black cumin (thymoquinone and monounsaturated fatty acids) on the synthesis of cholesterol by hepatocytes or fractional reabsorption from the small intestine [29]. It is also believed that phytosterols of N. sativa inhibit cholesterol absorption and may interfere with the reabsorption of endogenous cholesterol [26]. Moreover, it has also been reported that N. sativa decreases plasma concentrations of cholesterol by stimulating bile acid excretion [5], and a reduction in plasma cholesterol level could also be attributed to the effects of black cumin on the cholesterol excretion into the intestine [21, 26]. As shown in Table 6, the lowering effects of N. sativa supplementation in the diet of commercial layers on cholesterol could be useful because lower egg yolk cholesterol of commercial layers’ eggs is highly desirable for human consumption [5], but it may not be useful in breeders because of egg yolk role in embryo development.

4.5.5. Serum Enzymes

Serum enzymes including ALP, ALT, and AST are mainly monitored for the evaluation of liver damage [3,9], and antioxidant activity of N. sativa components such as thymoquinone may play a vital role in the prevention of liver tissue [64]. The reduction of ALP and AST levels of broiler chickens fed with N. sativa supplementation observed during this study (Table 6) is in agreement with previous reports [21, 40, 59] but is in disagreement with that observed by Shewita and Taha [37] who reported that serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) level significantly increased with N. sativa supplementation. As shown in Table 6, increasing effects of N. sativa seeds on levels of ALT observed during this study have also been reported [40] and may indicate positive effects of N. sativa on liver health because ALT level is commonly used clinically as a biomarker for liver health.

5. Conclusion

Supplementation of N. sativa seed (1-2%) in broiler diets, as a multipurpose natural growth promoter, improves performance, elevates humoral immune responses, affects serum biochemical profiles of broiler chickens, and induces changes in their hemogram (Hb, PCV) and leukogram, while there are no side, residual, and hazardous effects.

Abbreviations

  • N:
  • Nigella
  • V:
  • Vaccinated
  • RBC:
  • Red blood cells
  • PCV:
  • Packed cell volume
  • MCV:
  • Mean corpuscular volume
  • MCH:
  • Mean corpuscular hemoglobin
  • MCHC:
  • Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
  • WBC:
  • White blood cells.
  • Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding this mansucript.

    Acknowledgments

    This research was financially supported (grants for three DVM theses) by the Vice-Chancellor for Research of Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

      Data Availability

      Data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

        The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.