Volume 2016, Issue 1 6416917
Research Article
Open Access

Caspian Sea Tidal Modelling Using Coastal Tide Gauge Data

Mahmoud Pirooznia

Corresponding Author

Mahmoud Pirooznia

Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran iau-arak.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Seyyed Rouhollah Emadi

Seyyed Rouhollah Emadi

Department of Surveying Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran iau-arak.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Mehdi Najafi Alamdari

Mehdi Najafi Alamdari

Department of Hydrography, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran iau-arak.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 July 2016
Citations: 3
Academic Editor: Karoly Nemeth

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to model tidal conditions in the Caspian Sea using data from coastal tide gauges of Anzali, Noshahr, and Neka Ports. Harmonic analysis method was used to identify and examine 40 tidal components. The results illustrate that the annual (Sa) and semiannual solar (Ssa) components on all of the ports listed have the highest range in comparison with the other components which are, respectively, 16 cm, 18 cm, and 15 cm for annual components and 2.8 cm, 5.4 cm, and 3.7 cm for semiannual components.

1. Introduction

The gravitational attraction between Earth, moon, and sun has a well-known influence on Earth’s ocean levels [1].

Tidal analysis and prediction are the primary steps in the studies of each hydrodynamic and coastal management matter. It is dealing with the analysis of the sea level heights observations using physical and geophysical approaches advanced from experiences or physical reasoning and based on spectral analysis [2, 3].

In general, for the modelling of tides, there are three main ways: first is using hydrodynamic models (Laplace differential equations (LTE)), second is empirical modelling, and third is combination of hydrodynamic models and empirical models [4].

Knowing the causes of water level fluctuations of the seas has been one of the major challenges in all scientific fields and attracts the attention of many researches. Oceanic effects, aerologic effects, tides, climate change, and vertical movement of Earth’s shell can be noted as five factors that contribute to the impacts of climate change on the water level fluctuations [5].

The prediction is used in science and engineering to confirm the sympathetic of a given phenomenon by stating what its behavior has been till now and will be at a given time and then verifying that it is so [3], although without considering the physical effects of the large events (e.g., tsunami, storms, and seabed earthquake) the prediction of water levels can be achieved [6].

Not only the tides currently are exactly identified in the most global ocean, but also we have learned and computed new features of tidal dynamics [7].

Tidal effects due to their significant impacts on sea water level are of a great importance and researchers have always been looking forward to modelling them [8].

However, numerous undesirable natural events may have an effect on the predictions, but still there are determinable parameters which are essential to handle them exactly; for example, astronomical arguments and nodal corrections are singing the important parts in dealing with tidal analysis and prediction [9].

In this study, the effectiveness of tidal components by the use of coastal tide gauge’s observations is surveyed. Harmonic analysis method was used to determine tidal amplitude and phase of 40 components.

(1) Study Area and Relevant Data. Caspian Sea is surrounded by five countries, including Iran, Russia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan (Figure 1). The Caspian Sea is the largest remaining section of the old Tethys Sea breakdown that was spread from the Arctic to Indian Ocean through the first to third geological period. In third geological period, appearance of Caucasus and Asian mountains leads to this big Sea dividing, so rise of European continent and construction of Iranian plateau were the main reasons of creation of Caspian Sea. Having the length of about 1030 km and the width of 435 to 196 km, the Caspian Sea locates between the 47°57′ an 36°33′ circuits and 46°43′ and 54°53′ hour circles [10].

Details are in the caption following the image
Caspian Sea location.

2. Tides

Tides are the regular ebbing and flowing movement of the sea happening as the result of attractions of celestial near-earth bodies such as the sun and the moon. Tidal acceleration of celestial objects such as the moon at one point is the difference between the gravity acceleration of that celestial body and the mass centre of the Earth at that point. Viscoelastic earth changes due to tidal forces are roughly one-third of the surface international water. The vector field of these forces can be replaced with a scalar field named potential of tides [11].

In each point of Earth, this potential can be computed by [12]
()
where G is the universal constant of gravity, M is the mass of absorbing body (moon or sun), Re is the average radius of Earth, R is the geocentric distance, and θ is the geological distance of a point with (Re, λ, ϕ) coordinates [1]. Main course of this relation is achieved when i = 2. However, in some cases, i = 3 is also used for the moon. Thus, the main indicator term of tidal potential is described as follows:
()
And regarding spherical trigonometry relations [4],
()

It can be seen clearly from this relation that the first parameter of the relation relates to the half-daily effects and the second and third parameters, respectively, show the effects of daily and long period of tides. This relationship suggests that the tidal potential is a function of the absorbent body (moon and sun). It should be noted that, except for the gravitational forces mentioned above, other factors may be effective in producing and intensifying the tides [13].

In general, the sea water level fluctuations can be obtained as the result of the interaction of following dynamic processes: tides, changes in atmospheric pressure, the dynamic effects of ocean circulation, wind effects, the effects of temperature, water salinity changes, the effects of river discharge into the oceans, and melting of polar ices.

3. Tidal Harmonic Analysis

In this study, the Fourier harmonic analysis method is used to determine the effect of tidal components. As tidal components frequency, water level in each moment and time was given, and the amplitude and phase of needed component were determined [14]:
()
where u(φ, λ, t) is water level in t moment obtained by tide gauge, MSL(ϕ, λ) is mean sea level, ωi = 2πfi is angular frequency derived from tidal components frequency, t is the observation time, and ai and bi are the Fourier coefficients we need to determine. Considering (4) and proration, the amplitude and the phase are calculated as
()
If m was observed value from tide gauge and n was the tidal component, then
()
A is Vandermonde (pattern) matrices [15]. As the result,
()
And the amplitude and phase of tidal components are determined from the following equation [16, 17]:
  • Amplitude:

    ()

  • Phase:

    ()

4. Tide Modelling

The following equation is used to analyze and predict the tide [18, 19]:
()

And n = 1,2, …, N tidal components.

In the above equation, Z0 is the average sea level, N is the number of tidal components, δn is angular frequency or speed (degree per hour), Vn(t0) is astronomical argument, fn(t) is nodal factor, un(t) is nodal phase, Hn is the component amplitude, and gn is the phase lag.

In above relations, nodal corrections (fn(t), un(t)) for each tidal component and astronomical argument (Vn(t0)) must be calculated in order to determine the revised amplitude and phase. In this step, Vn(t0) is computed as
()
where (ib, ic, id, ie, if) are the constituent’s Doodson numbers in which solar coefficients are preferred to lunar coefficients and the desired time is the time data starting in zero hour UT (Universal Time) and remaining terms are as follows:
  • (i)

    λs(t) or simply “s” is the Mean Longitude of Moon.

  • (ii)

    λh(t) or simply “h” is the Mean Longitude of Sun.

  • (iii)

    λp(t) or simply “P” is the Longitude of Lunar Perigee.

  • (iv)

    λN(t) or simply “N” is the Longitude of Lunar Ascending Node.

  • (v)

    or simply “P” or “P1” is the Longitude of Perihelion.

  • (vi)

    Φn is stationary phase (a multiple of 90°).

Stationary phase exists in most of Doodson numbers’ tables. Algebraic formula to determine the geographic Astronomical Longitude (the Celestial Sphere) λs(t), λh(t), λP(t), λN(t), or in some references in form of (s, h, P, N, P) has been provided [20, 21]. In this study, Task-2000 method has been used.

Task-2000 is based on zero hour epochs UT, January 1900. This formula is accurate at least from 1800 to 2100 [22]:
()
where
()
In this formula, IL is the number of leap years from 1900 onward that is calculated by the following equation:
()

IDAY is the number of days from January 1st of that year.

5. Forming the Observations Time Series of Coastal Tide Gauge

Features of tide gauge stations which are formed from their time series data were in Table 1 and geographical position of tide gauge stations could be seen in Figure 2.

Table 1. The location of Caspian Sea coastal tide gauge stations.
Station name Latitude Longitude Time spam
Anzali 37.4780° 49.4623° 21/3/2005–20/3/2014
Noshahr 36.6584° 51.5047° 21/3/2006–21/3/2014
Neka 36.8502° 53.3656° 1/1/2000–31/8/2012
Details are in the caption following the image
Display studied stations.

The analysis of time series Anzali tide gauge station and modelling time series by (10) could be seen in Figure 3. Residuals are small and acceptable. More amplitude to frequency of 40 tidal components of Anzali tidal gauge station could be seen (Figure 4). The values of time series analysis in Anzali station as well as the values of time series modelling analysis are shown in Table 2. It is shown that the modelling was done well. The same process was continued for stations Noshahr and Neka (Figures 58). Also, results of time series analysis and results of time series modelling in stations Noshahr and Neka are shown in Tables 3-4.

Table 2. The amplitude and phase of 40 tidal components for Anzali tide gauge station, obtained from observations and modelling.
Constituent Amp_obs (m) Phase_obs (deg) Amp_mod (m) Phase_mod (deg)
K2 0.003015 295.7626 0.00208 286.43
L2 0.001672 271.2841 0.00171 271.46
M2 0.008682 269.2956 0.0084 269.245
N2 0.003698 158.6862 0.00374 159.22
Ma2 0.003133 296.7903 0.00314 296.79
R2 0.017878 73.22793 0.01812 78.22
S2 0.012064 67.14119 0.01206 67.141
T2 0.005672 144.9542 0.0065 142.954
J1 0.001707 121.5101 0.0017 121.8201
K1 0.022738 11.43623 0.0233 11.3
M1 0.007332 67.24207 0.0073 68.45
O1 0.006945 165.1889 0.00693 165.1923
P1 0.00704 217.9986 0.007245 218.43
Q1 0.008204 232.6201 0.008325 232.56
S1 0.008428 83.31833 0.008267 84.673
M3 0.0072 93.20983 0.00687 93.65
S3 0.002717 119.0538 0.00281 119.487
M4 0.005868 233.6994 0.00589 233.996
S4 0.006028 85.39538 0.006518 85.7
M5 0.015845 21.3593 0.01522 21.487
M6 0.004693 239.5097 0.00467 240.43
S6 0.004883 193.316 0.0049 193.76
M8 0.008275 265.0774 0.00865 265.9
S8 0.003187 159.8985 0.00376 158.34
Mf 0.006459 109.5878 0.006217 107.789
Mm 0.007524 134.4543 0.00776 136.89
Msf 0.000792 77.13807 0.000734 76.54
Oo1 0.006236 355.2012 0.006236 355.34
Ssa 0.028563 55.42608 0.02862 53.56
Ms4 0.070979 15.67987 0.0704 15.456
Mn4 0.018667 186.2534 0.01889 186.789
Mk3 0.02533 282.7036 0.0255 282.408
Sa 0.163234 212.3174 0.163198 212.456
Mo3 0.007534 219.1039 0.007423 218.56
No3 0.026181 8.642835 0.026789 9.43
2N2 0.006548 46.04756 0.006437 47.13
So3 0.028834 137.9187 0.02889 136.67
Sk3 0.006522 44.34284 0.00657 44.389
S01 0.001092 68.53536 0.001034 68.576
Mk4 0.022139 331.8166 0.0234 331.8834
Table 3. The amplitude and phase of 40 tidal components for Noshahr tide gauge station, obtained from observations and modelling.
Constituent Amp_obs (m) Phase_obs (deg) Amp_mod (m) Phase_mod (deg)
K2 0.001265 205.3896 0.001276 204.9
L2 0.000134 104.9257 0.000144 103.89
M2 0.010247 275.8484 0.01028 276.896
N2 0.002429 110.3829 0.002534 110.789
Ma2 0.002005 73.94501 0.002007 74.289
R2 0.00083 248.9937 0.00076 249.3397
S2 0.001758 10.64485 0.001777 10.5689
T2 0.00104 252.2587 0.001067 252.678
J1 0.000575 38.258 0.000589 38.378
K1 0.003133 206.5065 0.003145 206.45
M1 0.000804 197.7024 0.000809 197.745
O1 0.001833 74.5144 0.001845 74.78
P1 0.001664 171.5155 0.001643 172.504
Q1 0.000887 255.0884 0.00076 255.56
S1 0.002105 352.2459 0.00167 352.214
M3 0.000044 284.4275 0.000245 284.545
S3 0.000222 10.67813 0.00678 10.63413
M4 0.000773 269.5824 0.00989 269.6724
S4 0.000389 334 0.000567 333.89
M5 0.000592 308.7407 0.000345 308.437
M6 0.000816 107.9719 0.00424 107.901
S6 0.001758 297.3552 0.00987 296.9552
M8 0.001783 300.9042 0.00345 300.405
S8 0.035218 128 0.03789 128.2362
Mf 0.005655 63.45231 0.00679 64.82
Mm 0.008585 157.1591 0.00567 156.2271
Msf 0.000698 171.7511 0.000778 171.842
Oo1 0.001602 126.1866 0.00189 125.731
Ssa 0.054341 86.44686 0.05345 86.461
Ms4 0.000389 142.9945 0.00927 143.18
Mn4 0.000375 12.73982 0.00678 13.7
Mk3 0.000346 67.02355 0.00345 66.425
Sa 0.188683 208.5804 0.18907 208.2541
Mo3 0.000228 52.28991 0.00789 51.75
No3 0.000178 216.8859 0.000845 217.323
2N2 0.000519 37.64077 0.000612 37.772
So3 0.000414 105.4683 0.000432 105.94
Sk3 0.000306 334.2423 0.000351 334.58
S01 0.000225 195.3219 0.000376 194.218
Mk4 0.000424 74.62624 0.000387 74.947
Table 4. The amplitude and phase of 40 tidal components for Neka tide gauge station, obtained from observations and modelling.
Constituent Amp_obs (m) Phase_obs (deg) Amp_mod (m) Phase_mod (deg)
K2 0.000609 248.292 0.00071 248.35
L2 0.000094 210.8618 0.000078 211.23
M2 0.003386 211.6024 0.00421 212.316
N2 0.000451 33.09812 0.000418 33.789
Ma2 0.000203 2.616894 0.000206 3.269
R2 0.00027 266.0452 0.000261 266.169
S2 0.001491 353.4808 0.00152 353.724
T2 0.000322 84.26617 0.000341 83.972
J1 0.0002 222.6129 0.000237 222.7034
K1 0.003984 232.586 0.004112 232.213
M1 0.000075 18.18968 0.000087 18.226
O1 0.001979 22.82131 0.002141 24.718
P1 0.000709 221.6676 0.000801 237.18
Q1 0.000071 199.8688 0.000076 200.1073
S1 0.001333 265.0889 0.001343 265.623
M3 0.000014 238.5899 0.000017 238.3041
S3 0.000127 71.53864 0.000143 70.946
M4 0.000041 106.7546 0.000052 106.9928
S4 0.00007 53.35676 0.000083 53.468
M5 0.000036 289.5994 0.000038 289.783
M6 0.00004 274.9504 0.000047 275.7935
S6 0.000042 59.32671 0.00004 58.87
M8 0.000071 0.493216 0.000082 0.78465
S8 0.000007 343.1489 0.000007 343.1376
Mf 0.003968 358.5273 0.003965 357.5186
Mm 0.001392 37.48796 0.001323 38.418
Msf 0.002203 332.5874 0.002212 333.64
Oo1 0.000043 172.098 0.000043 172.487
Ssa 0.037471 90.08432 0.0375 91.508
Ms4 0.000045 225.9218 0.00005 226.5
Mn4 0.000063 309.734 0.00006 310.47
Mk3 0.000063 168.7787 0.00007 169.681
Sa 0.151559 218.163 0.1518 217.2045
Mo3 0.000028 42.31016 0.000027 43.401
No3 0.000055 308.456 0.000054 307.731
2N2 0.000032 294.6541 0.000034 295.391
So3 0.00005 94.33536 0.00006 95.591
Sk3 0.000114 73.86118 0.000145 74.584
S01 0.000171 47.30391 0.000182 47.835
Mk4 0.000058 116.3563 0.000072 116.2482
Details are in the caption following the image
Time series along with the tidal modelling and residual of Anzali tide gauge station.
Details are in the caption following the image
Amplitude to frequency of 40 tidal components of Anzali tidal gauge station.
Details are in the caption following the image
Time series along with the tidal modelling and residual of Noshahr tide gauge station.
Details are in the caption following the image
Amplitude to frequency of 40 tidal components of Noshahr tidal gauge station.
Details are in the caption following the image
Time series along with the tidal modelling and residual of Neka tide gauge station.
Details are in the caption following the image
Amplitude to frequency of 40 tidal components of Neka tidal gauge station.

6. Conclusion

Tidal analysis of tide gauge stations illustrates the absence of efficiency in tidal components except for annual and semiannual components. However, unlike other stations, in Anzali station, MS4 components were effective.

The results also indicate that the annual (Sa) and semiannual solar (Ssa) components on all of the ports listed have the highest range in comparison with the other components which are, respectively, 16 cm, 18 cm, and 15 cm for annual components and 2.8 cm, 5.4 cm, and 3.7 cm for semiannual components.

By comparing the results with other studies [23, 24], the results of tidal analysis of this study are confirmed. The effect of the tides in the Caspian Sea is very small and there are only annual and monthly variations.

In [23], spectral analysis on tide gauge observation of Caspian Sea was done where the annual and semiannual component effect were observed. So it is corresponding with tidal analysis of this study.

Ignoring the modulation of solar perihelion and nodal modulation use can be mentioned as the weak points which were effective in tidal harmonic analysis; 18.6 time series must exist for resolving all frequencies. As for the other defects of this study, we can point out that there is no easy way to indicate the significance of amplitude and phase together with lack of appropriate solution for coastal areas that affects the shape of tidal waves.

In this study, the method of modelling and predicting of sea level is explained. With modelling sea level, the trend of sea level in future will be predicted and it helps coastal management. Also, in areas where effect of tide is high, by having sea level prediction with modelling, tide can be used to assess other factors affecting sea level variations like tsunami, vertical movement of the crust, and so forth.

The main problem with Caspian Sea tide gauge stations data is improper collecting and compiling them. Moreover, the sampling intervals in Anzali and Noshahr tide gauges are daily and each three hours, respectively, that can affect the tidal modelling and will decrease the accuracy of the computation.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.