Volume 2014, Issue 1 514631
Research Article
Open Access

Stability of Nonlinear Fractional Neutral Differential Difference Systems

Kewei Liu

Corresponding Author

Kewei Liu

School of Mathematics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China hfut.edu.cn

School of Mathematical Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China ahu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Wei Jiang

Wei Jiang

School of Mathematical Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China ahu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 July 2014
Academic Editor: Zhen Jin

Abstract

We study the stability of a class of nonlinear fractional neutral differential difference systems equipped with the Caputo derivative. We extend Lyapunov-Krasovskii theorem for the nonlinear fractional neutral systems. Conditions of stability and instability are obtained for the nonlinear fractional neutral systems.

1. Introduction

Recently, fractional differential equations have attracted great attention. It has been proved that fractional differential equations are valuable tools in the modeling of many phenomena in various fields of engineering, physics, and economics. For details and examples, see [15] and the references therein.

Stability analysis is always one of the most important issues in the theory of differential equations and their applications for both deterministic and stochastic cases. Recently, stability of fractional differential equations has attracted increasing interest. Since fractional derivatives are nonlocal and have weakly singular kernels, the analysis on stability of fractional differential equations is more complex than that of classical differential equations. The earliest study on stability of fractional differential equations started in [6]; the author studied the case of linear Caputo fractional differential equations. Since then, many researchers have done further studies on the stability of fractional differential systems [718]. For more details about the stability results and the methods available to analyze the stability of fractional differential systems, the reader may refer to the recent survey papers [19, 20] and the references therein.

As we all know, Lyapunov’s second method provides a way to analyze the stability of a system without explicitly solving the differential equations. It is necessary to extend Lyapunov’s second method to fractional systems. In [13, 14], the fractional Lyapunov’s second method was proposed, and the authors extended the exponential stability of integer order differential system to the Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional differential system. In [15], by using Bihari’s and Bellman-Gronwall’s inequality, an extension of Lyapunov’s second method for fractional-order systems was proposed. In [1618], Baleanu et al. extended Lyapunov’s method to fractional functional differential systems and developed the Lyapunov-Krasovskii stability theorem, Lyapunov-Razumikhin stability theorem, and Mittag-Leffler stability theorem for fractional functional differential systems.

As far as we know, there are few papers with respect to the stability of fractional neutral systems. In this paper, we consider the stability of a class of nonlinear fractional neutral differential difference equations with the Caputo derivative. Motivated by Li et al. [13, 14], Baleanu et al. [16], and Cruz and Hale [21], we address the stability of fractional neutral systems. Specifically, we extend the Lyapunov-Krasovskii method for the nonlinear fractional neutral differential difference systems.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some notations and recall some concepts and preparation results. In Section 3, we develop the Lyapunov-Krasovskii theorem for the nonlinear fractional neutral differential difference systems; results of stability, asymptotically stability, uniform stability, uniform asymptotically stability, and instability for the nonlinear fractional neutral systems are presented. Section 4 brings an example to illustrate the results presented and finally Section 5 concludes the work.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we introduce notations, definitions, and preliminary facts needed here. Throughout this paper, let be a real n-dimensional linear vector space with the norm |·|; let be the space of continuous functions taking [−r, 0] into with ∥ϕ∥, defined by ∥ϕ∥ = sup⁡s∈[−r,0]⁡|ϕ(s)|, , r > 0, M > 0 be constants. Let be the space of functions f(t) which are absolutely continuous on [a, b] and let be the space of functions f(t) which have continuous derivatives up to order n − 1 on [a, b] such that . If , A > 0 and , then, for any t ∈ [σ, σ + A], we let be defined by xt(θ) = x(t + θ), θ ∈ [−r, 0].

Let us recall the following definitions. For more details, we refer the reader to [15].

Definition 1. The fractional order integral of a function of order is defined by

()
where Γ(·) is the gamma function.

Definition 2. For a function f given on the interval [t0, ), the α order Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of f is defined by

()
where .

Definition 3. For a function , the α order Caputo fractional derivative of f is defined by

()

Some properties of the aforementioned operators are recalled as follows [1, 5].

Property 4. The following results are especially interesting.

  • (i)

    For ν > −1, we have .

  • (ii)

    When 0 < α < 1, we have

    ()

  • (iii)

    For α ∈ (0,1), Tt0, and , we have , .

Remark 5. From Property 4, if , α ∈ (0,1), then, for tt0, we have the following.

  • (i)

    f(t) ≥ f(t0).

  • (ii)

    In general, it is not true that f(t) is nondecreasing in t.

In [21], Cruz and Hale studied a class of functional difference operators which are very useful in stability theory and the asymptotic behavior of solutions of functional differential equations of neutral type. Suppose , is continuous, g(t, ϕ) is linear in ϕ, and there are an n × n matrix μ(t, θ), t ∈ [τ, +), θ ∈ [−r, 0], of bounded variation in θ and a scalar function l(s) continuously nondecreasing for s ∈ [0, r], l(0) = 0, such that
()
for all t ∈ [τ, +), . Define the linear functional difference operator
()
by
()
For any , the space of continuous functions taking [τ, +) into , σ ∈ [τ, +) consider the equation
()

Definition 6 (see [21].)Suppose is a subset of . Ones says the operator is uniformly stable with respect to if there are constants K, M such that, for any , σ ∈ [τ, +) and , the solution x(t, σ, φ, H) of (8) satisfies

()

Lemma 7 (see [21].)If is uniformly stable with respect to , then there are positive constants a, b, c, d such that, for any , σ ∈ [τ, +), the solution x(t, σ, φ, h) of the equation

()
satisfies
()
for all tσ. Furthermore, the constants a, b, c, d can be chosen so that for any s ∈ [σ, +)
()
for all ts + r.

Definition 8 (see [22].)Suppose is linear, continuous, and atomic at 0 and let . The operator is said to be stable if the zero solution of the homogeneous difference equation,

()
is uniformly asymptotically stable.

Definition 9 (see [23].)The matrix is Schur stable if the spectrum of the matrix lies in the open unit disc of the complex plane.

Consider a simple operator , where the matrix B is Schur stable. Let x(t) be a solution of the homogeneous difference equation
()
Then, for a given t ≥ 0, there must exist a positive integer number k such that t ∈ [(k − 1)r, kr]. It follows from (14) that
()
Since the matrix B is Schur stable, there exist L ≥ 1 and 0 < ζ < 1 such that the inequality holds. Therefore we have
()
Since lim⁡kζk = 0, it follows from (16) that the zero solution of the homogeneous difference equation (14) is uniformly asymptotically stable. Therefore we have the following remark.

Remark 10. Let , where B is Schur stable. Then is stable.

3. Main Results

In this section, we consider the stability of the following nonlinear fractional neutral differential difference system:
()
with the initial condition
()
where 0 < α < 1, is continuous, Lipschitz in xt, and takes closed bounded sets into bounded sets and g(t, 0) = f(t, 0) ≡ 0; the linear difference operator is defined in (7) with g satisfying (5); that is, g(t, ϕ) is uniformly nonatomic at zero [22]. Here, we always assume that fractional order neutral system (17) with initial condition (18) has a unique continuous solution x(t) which depends continuously upon t0, φ.
If is continuously differentiable, we define the Caputo fractional derivative along the solution xt = xt(t0, φ) of (17)-(18) as
()

Definition 11. We say that the zero solution x = 0 of (17) is stable if, for any and any ε > 0, there exists a δ = δ(t0, ε) such that any solution x(t) = x(t, t0, φ) of (17) with initial value φ at t0, ∥φ∥ < δ, satisfies |x(t)| < ε for tt0. It is asymptotically stable if it is stable and, for any and any ε > 0, there exists a δ0 = δ(t0, ε), T(t0, ε) > 0 such that ∥φ∥ < δ0 implies |x(t)| ≤ ε, for tt0 + T(t0, ε); that is, lim⁡t→+x(t) = 0. It is uniformly stable if it is stable and δ = δ(ε) > 0 can be chosen independently of t0. It is uniformly asymptotically stable if it is uniformly stable and there exists a δ0 > 0; for any η > 0, there exists a T = T(η) > 0 such that ∥φ∥ < δ0 implies |x(t)| < η for t > t0 + T.

Next, we will address the main core of the paper, the stability of the nonlinear fractional neutral systems (17). Firstly, we consider the case ; that is, is independent of t. Now, we give the following Lyapunov-Krasovskii theorems for nonlinear fractional neutral systems (17).

Theorem 12. Let , let B be Schur stable, and let x = 0 be an equilibrium point of system (17). Then the zero solution of system (17) is stable if and only if there exist a functional and a continuous function u(s) with u(s) > 0 for s > 0 and u(0) = 0 such that the following conditions are satisfied.

  • (1)

    V(t, 0) = 0.

  • (2)

    .

  • (3)

    For any given t0 the functional V(t0, ϕ) is continuous in ϕ at the point 0; that is, for any ε > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that the inequality ∥ϕ∥ < δ implies |V(t0, ϕ) − V(t0, 0)| = V(t0, ϕ) < ε.

  • (4)

    Along the solutions of system (17) the functional V(t, ϕ) satisfies V(t, xt(t0, φ)) ≤ V(t0, φ) for tt0.

Proof Sufficiency. Since the matrix B is Schur stable, there exist L ≥ 1 and 0 < ζ < 1 such that the inequality holds for k ≥ 0.

For a given ε > 0  (ε < M), we set ε1 = ε(1 − ζ)/L > 0. Since for a given t0 functional V(t0, ϕ) is continuous in ϕ at the point 0, there exists δ1(ε, t0) such that V(t0, ϕ) < u(ε1) for any , with ∥ϕ∥ < δ1(ε, t0). Here, we claim that δ1(ε, t0) ≤ ε1. then, there exists an initial function such that ∥φ∥ < δ1(ε, t0) and . On the one hand, for this initial function, we have . On the other hand, . The contradiction proves the desired inequality.

Now we take δ(ε, t0) = δ1(ε, t0)/(1 + Lζ). For with ∥φ∥ < δ(ε, t0), we have

()
Next, we wish to show
()
Assume by contradiction that there exists a t1t0 for which
()
Since
()
and is a continuous function of t, there exists such that
()
On the one hand, we have
()
On the other hand, relation (20) provides the following inequality:
()
The contradiction proves that inequality (22) is wrong and relation (21) is true. Then there exists a function z(t) with |z(t)| < ε1, tt0 such that
()

For a given tt0, there must exist a positive integer number k such that t ∈ [t0 + (k − 1)r, t0 + kr]. Iterating equality (27) k − 1 times we obtain

()
Since tkr ∈ [t0r, t0],
()
and we obtain the following inequality:
()
Therefore, the zero solution of system (17) is stable.

Necessity. Now, the zero solution of system (17) is stable, and we must prove that there exist a function u(s) and a functional V(t, ϕ) that satisfy the conditions (1)–(4).

Since the zero solution of system (17) is stable, for ε = M there exists δ(M, t0) such that the inequality ∥φ∥ < δ(M, t0) implies that |x(t, t0, φ))| < M for tt0. We define the function u(s) = s, and the functional V(t, ϕ) as follows:

()
Since for φ = 0 the corresponding solution is trivial, x(t, t0, 0) = 0, tt0, we obtain V(t, 0) = 0. In the case where |x(s, t0, φ)| < M, st0, we have
()
In the other case where there exists Tt0 such that |x(T, t0, φ)| ≥ M, the following inequality holds:
()
Further, for a given t0, the stability of the zero solution means that for any ε > 0 there exists δ1 = δ(ε/(1 + Lζ), t0) such that ∥φ∥ ≤ δ1 implies
()
Then
()
Therefore,
()
That is, for a fixed t0 the functional V(t0, φ) is continuous in φ at the point 0.

Finally, we need to show V(t, xt(t0, φ)) ≤ V(t0, φ), tt0. First, if |x(s, t0, φ)| < M for st0,

()
Note that {s : st}⊆{s : st0} for tt0; then we have
()
In the second case, there exists Tt0 such that |x(T, t0, φ)| ≥ M; we have
()
Therefore, we have
()
Then, the proof is complete.

Remark 13. The functional (31) has only an academic value. Obviously, we cannot use such functionals in applications. The computation of practically useful Lyapunov functionals is a very difficult task.

Theorem 14. Let , B be Schur stable and let x = 0 be an equilibrium point of system (17). Suppose u(s) is a continuous function with u(s) > 0 for s > 0 and u(0) = 0. If there exists a continuous functional such that the following conditions are satisfied:

  • (1)

    V(t, 0) = 0,

  • (2)

    ,

  • (3)

    along the solutions of the system (5) the functional V(t, ϕ) is continuously differentiable and satisfies

    ()
    where β ∈ (0,1],

then the zero solution of system (17) is stable.

Proof. Note that the theorem conditions imply that of Theorem 12; therefore, the zero solution of system (17) is stable.

Theorem 15. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 14 are satisfied except replacing by ; then one has the same result for stability.

Proof. By using Property 4 we have

()
Since V(t0, φ) ≥ 0, then . Then we can obtain the same result for stability.

Next, we present the following sufficient conditions for the asymptotic stability of the zero solution of system (17).

Theorem 16. Let , let B be Schur stable, and let x = 0 be an equilibrium point of system (17). Suppose u(s), w(s) are continuous functions, u(s), w(s) are positive for s > 0, and u(0) = w(0) = 0. If there exists a continuously differentiable functional such that the following conditions are satisfied:

  • (1)

    V(t, 0) = 0,

  • (2)

    ,

  • (3)

    , where β ∈ (0,1],

then the zero solution of system (17) is asymptotically stable.

Proof. Since the matrix B is Schur stable, there exist L ≥ 1 and 0 < ζ < 1 such that the inequality holds for k ≥ 0.

Note that the conditions (1)–(3) of the theorem imply that of Theorem 14; then the zero solution of system (17) is stable; that is, for any ε > 0 and t0, there exists δ(ε, t0) > 0 such that for every initial function , with ∥φ∥ < δ(ε, t0), the following inequality holds:

()

Now, let . Given t0 and an initial function with , we have

()
Next, we wish to show
()
Suppose not, then there exist ε0 > 0 and a sequence , tk, as k such that
()
Without loss of generality we may assume that tk+1tkr for k ≥ 0. It follows from system (17) that
()
Then, we have
()
Since f takes bounded sets into bounded sets, there is a constant L0 such that |f(t, xt(t0, φ))| ≤ L0 for tt0, . Then
()
Hence, for any k ≥ 1, we have
()
where θ = min⁡{r, [Γ(1 + α)ε0/4L0] 1/α}. Let . Then there exists some such that
()
From the third condition of the theorem, we have
()
That is,
()
which contradicts the condition (2) of the theorem. Therefore, relation (45) is true. This means that there exists a function z(t) with lim⁡t⁡|z(t)| = 0 such that
()
And given a positive value ε1 < ε, there exists t1 > t0 such that
()
Then there exists k0 such that Lζkε < (1/2)ε1 for kk0. Thus, we have
()
Therefore, we have lim⁡tx(t, t0, φ) = 0; that is, the zero solution of system (17) is asymptotically stable.

Theorem 17. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 16 are satisfied except replacing by ; then one has the same result for asymptotical stability.

Proof. By using Property 4 we have

()
Since V(t0, φ) ≥ 0, then . Then we can obtain the same result for asymptotical stability.

Here, we present the following sufficient conditions for the instability of the zero solution of system (17).

Theorem 18. Suppose in (17) is independent of t, is continuous and maps bounded sets into bounded sets, and there exist continuous, nondecreasing nonnegative functions a(s), b(s), s ≥ 0, positive for s > 0, an open set S in , and a bounded open neighborhood U of zero in such that V(ϕ) satisfies the following.

  • (i)

    V(ϕ) > 0 on S, V(ϕ) = 0 on the boundary S of S.

  • (ii)

    0 belongs to the closure of SU.

  • (iii)

    on .

  • (iv)

    on , β ∈ (0,1].

Under these conditions, the zero solution of (17) is unstable. More specifically, each solution x = x(t, t0, φ) of (17) with initial value φ in SU at must reach the boundary of U in finite time.

Proof. Suppose φ0SU, . Then V(φ0) > 0. From (iv), the solution x(t, t0, φ0) satisfies V(xt) ≥ V(φ0) as long as xtSU. From (iii) and (iv), this implies

()
as long as xtSU. Then this relation implies
()
as long as xtSU. Since U is bounded and V is bounded on U, there must be a t1 such that . But hypothesis (i) implies that . This proves the last assertion of the theorem. Hypothesis (ii) implies that each neighborhood of zero contains a φ0 in SU. Thus, x = 0 is unstable and the theorem is proved.

Finally, we consider that the case is dependent of t and give the following Lyapunov-Krasovskii theorems for nonlinear fractional neutral systems (17).

Theorem 19. Suppose is uniformly stable with respect to , u(s), v(s), w(s) are continuous nondecreasing functions, u(s), v(s) are positive for s > 0, u(0) = v(0) = 0, and w(s) is nonnegative. If there exists a continuously differentiable functional such that

  • (i)

    ,

  • (ii)

    , β ∈ (0,1],

then the zero solution of (17) is uniformly stable. If, in addition, w(s) > 0 for s > 0, then it is uniformly asymptotically stable.

Proof. Suppose the constants b, c, d are defined as in Lemma 7, and x(t) = x(t, t0, φ) is solution of (17)-(18). For any ε > 0, we can find a sufficiently small δ such that bδ < ε/2, v(δ) < u(ε/2(c + d)). Hence, for any initial time t0 and any initial condition with ∥φ∥ < δ, we have , and therefore V(t, xt(t0, φ)) ≤ V(t0, φ) for any tt0. This implies that

()
which implies that for tt0. Since is uniformly stable, Lemma 7 implies
()
Therefore, the zero solution is uniformly stable.

To prove uniform asymptotic stability, let ε0∶ = ε = 1; choose δ0∶ = δ(1) > 0 which correspond to uniform stability. Then, for any , ∥φ∥ < δ0 implies

()

Next, for any η > 0, we wish to show that there is a T(δ0, η) such that any solution x(t, t0, φ) of (17) with ∥φ∥ < δ0 satisfies ∥xt(t0, φ)∥ < η for tt0 + T(δ0, η). To do this, we show that there is a T(δ0, η) and t1 in [t0, t0 + T(δ0, η)] such that , where δ = δ(η) is the above constant for uniform stability. The uniform stability then implies that ∥xt(t0, φ)∥ < η for tt1 and, in particular, for tt0 + T(δ0, η).

For a, b, c, d as in Lemma 7, choose N = N(δ0, η) so that

()
Let T(δ0, η) = N + r + [v(δ0)Γ(1 + β)/w(δ/2d)] 1/β. Suppose there is a solution x = x(t, t0, φ) of (17) with ∥φ∥ < δ0 and ∥xt(t0, φ)∥ ≥ δ for tt0. Taking s = t0 + [v(δ0)Γ(1 + β)/w(δ/2d)] 1/β, t = s∶ = s + N + r in relation (12), we have
()
Therefore, there exists a t ∈ [s, s] such that . Then, by the condition (ii) of the theorem, we have
()
and hence by Property 4 we conclude
()
Then by using Property 4 and condition (i) of the theorem, we have
()
As a result we obtain
()

This contradiction proves that there exists a t1 ∈ [t0, t0 + T(δ0, η)] such that . Thus, we have |x(t, t0, φ)| < η, tt0 + T(δ0, η), whenever ∥φ∥ < δ0. This proves the uniform asymptotic stability of the zero solution of (17).

Theorem 20. Suppose that the assumptions in Theorem 19 are satisfied except replacing by ; then one has the same result for uniform stability and uniform asymptotic stability.

Proof. By using Property 4 we have

()
Since V(t0, φ) ≥ 0, then . Then we can obtain the same result for uniform stability and uniform asymptotic stability.

4. An Illustrative Example

A fractional neutral differential difference system is considered in the following state-space description:
()
where 0 < α < 1, , B is Schur stable, f(0) = 0, , and there exist a continuous function u(s) with u(s) > 0 for s > 0 and u(0) = 0 such that ; then the equilibrium point x = 0 of system (70) is stable.

Proof. Let the Lyapunov candidate be , then, for 0 < β < 1, we have

()
Then, it follows from Theorem 14 that the equilibrium point x = 0 of system (70) is stable.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we have studied the stability of a class of nonlinear fractional neutral differential difference systems. We introduce the Lyapunov-Krasovskii approach for fractional neutral systems, which enrich the knowledge of both the system theory and the fractional calculus. By using Lyapunov-Krasovskii technique, stability and instability criteria are obtained for the nonlinear fractional neutral differential difference systems. Finally, we point out that since the computation of practically useful Lyapunov functionals is a very difficult task, fractional Lyapunov method has its own limitations. In other words, the present paper is only an introduction to the topic, and there remains a lot of work to do.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11371027), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2013HGXJ0226), and the Fund of Anhui University Graduate Academic Innovation Research (10117700004).

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.