Incomplete Bivariate Fibonacci and Lucas p-Polynomials
Abstract
We define the incomplete bivariate Fibonacci and Lucas p-polynomials. In the case x = 1, y = 1, we obtain the incomplete Fibonacci and Lucas p-numbers. If x = 2, y = 1, we have the incomplete Pell and Pell-Lucas p-numbers. On choosing x = 1, y = 2, we get the incomplete generalized Jacobsthal number and besides for p = 1 the incomplete generalized Jacobsthal-Lucas numbers. In the case x = 1, y = 1, p = 1, we have the incomplete Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. If x = 1, y = 1, p = 1, k = ⌊(n − 1)/(p + 1)⌋, we obtain the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Also generating function and properties of the incomplete bivariate Fibonacci and Lucas p-polynomials are given.
1. Introduction
2. Incomplete Bivariate Fibonacci and Lucas p-Polynomials
Definition 2.1. For p ≥ 1, n ≥ 1, incomplete bivariate Fibonacci p-polynomials are defined as
For x = 1, y = 1, , we get incomplete Fibonacci p-numbers [7].
If x = 2, y = 1, , we obtained incomplete Pell p-numbers [8].
On choosing x = 1, y = 2, , we have incomplete generalized Jacobsthal numbers [4].
If x = 1, y = 1, p = 1, , we get incomplete Fibonacci numbers [2].
For , we obtained Fibonacci numbers [9].
Definition 2.2. For p ≥ 1, n ≥ 1, incomplete bivariate Lucas p-polynomials are defined as
If x = 1, y = 1, , we obtained incomplete Lucas p-numbers [7].
For x = 2, y = 1, , we have incomplete Pell-Lucas p-numbers [8].
On choosing x = 1, y = 2, p = 1, , we get incomplete generalized Jacobsthal-Lucas numbers [4].
If x = 1, y = 1, p = 1, , we obtained incomplete Lucas numbers [2].
For x = 1, y = 1, p = 1, k = ⌊n/(p + 1)⌋, , we have Lucas numbers [9].
Proposition 2.3. The incomplete bivariate Fibonacci p-polynomials satisfy the following recurrence relation:
Proof. Using (2.1), we obtain
Taking x = y = 1 in (2.3), we could obtain a formula for incomplete Fibonacci p-numbers (see [7, Proposition 3]). Taking x = y = p = 1 in (2.3), we could obtain a formula for incomplete Fibonacci numbers (see [2, Proposition 1]).
Proposition 2.4. The nonhomogeneous recurrence relation of incomplete bivariate Fibonacci p-polynomials is
Proposition 2.5. For 0 ≤ k ≤ (n − h − p − 1)/(p + 1), one has
Proof. Equation (2.6) clearly holds for h = 0. Suppose that the equation holds for h > 0. We show that the equation holds for (h + 1). We have
Proposition 2.6. For n ≥ k(p + 1) + p + 2,
We have the following proposition in which the relationship between the incomplete bivariate Fibonacci and Lucas p-polynomials is preserved as found in [5] before.
Proposition 2.7. One has
Proposition 2.8. The incomplete bivariate Lucas p-polynomials satisfy the following recurrence relation:
Proposition 2.9. The nonhomogeneous recurrence relation of incomplete bivariate Lucas p-polynomials is
Proposition 2.10. For 0 ≤ k ≤ (n − p − h)/(p + 1), one has
Proof. Proof is similar to the proof of Proposition 2.5.
Proposition 2.11. For n ≥ (k + 1)(p + 1), one has
Proof. Proof is obtained immediately by using (2.11) and induction h.
Proposition 2.12. One has
Proof. We can write from (2.2)
Then we have the following conclusion.
3. Generating Functions of the Incomplete Bivariate Fibonacci and Lucas p-Polynomials
Lemma 3.1 (see [3].)Let be a complex sequence satisfying the following nonhomogeneous recurrence relation:
Theorem 3.2. The generating function of the incomplete bivariate Fibonacci p-polynomials is
Proof. From (2.1) and (2.5), ,
Theorem 3.3. The generating function of the incomplete bivariate Lucas p-polynomials is