Approximation of Solutions of an Equilibrium Problem in a Banach Space
Abstract
An equilibrium problem is investigated based on a hybrid projection iterative algorithm. Strong convergence theorems for solutions of the equilibrium problem are established in a strictly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space which also enjoys the Kadec-Klee property.
1. Introduction
Equilibrium problems which were introduced by Fan [1] and Blum and Oettli [2] have had a great impact and influence on the development of several branches of pure and applied sciences. It has been shown that the equilibrium problem theory provides a novel and unified treatment of a wide class of problems which arise in economics, finance, image reconstruction, ecology, transportation, network, elasticity, and optimization. It has been shown [3–8] that equilibrium, problems include variational inequalities, fixed point, the Nash equilibrium, and game theory as special cases. A number of iterative algorithms have recently been studying for fixed point and equilibrium problems, see [9–26] and the references therein. However, there were few results established in the framework of the Banach spaces. In this paper, we suggest and analyze a projection iterative algorithm for finding solutions of equilibrium in a Banach space.
2. Preliminaries
where 〈·, ·〉 denotes the generalized duality pairing of elements between E and E*.
It is known that a uniformly convex Banach space is reflexive and strictly convex; for details see [27] and the references therein.
Recall that a Banach space E is said to have the Kadec-Klee property if a sequence {xn} of E satisfies that xn⇀x ∈ C, where ⇀ denotes the weak convergence, and ∥xn∥→∥x∥, where → denotes the strong convergence, and then xn → x. It is known that if E is uniformly convex, then E enjoys the Kadec-Klee property; for details see [26] and the references therein.
E is said to be smooth provided lim t→0(∥x + ty∥−∥x∥)/t exists for all x, y ∈ UE. It is also said to be uniformly smooth if the limit is attained uniformly for all x, y ∈ UE.
It is well known that if E* is strictly convex, then J is single valued; if E* is reflexive, and smooth, then J is single valued and demicontinuous; for more details see [27, 28] and the references therein.
It is also well known that if D is a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of a Hilbert space H, and PD : H → D is the metric projection from H onto D, then PD is nonexpansive. This fact actually characterizes the Hilbert spaces, and consequently, it is not available in more general Banach spaces. In this connection, Alber [29] introduced a generalized projection operator ΠD in the Banach spaces which is an analogue of the metric projection in the Hilbert spaces.
The asymptotic behavior of a relatively nonexpansive mapping was studied in [27, 29, 30].
To study the equilibrium problem (2.8), we may assume that f satisfies the following conditions:
(A1) f(x, x) = 0, for all x ∈ C;
(A2) f is monotone, that is, f(x, y) + f(y, x) ≤ 0, for all x, y ∈ C;
(A4) for each x ∈ C, y ↦ f(x, y) is convex and weakly lower semicontinuous.
In this paper, we study the problem of approximating solutions of equilibrium problem (2.8) based on a hybrid projection iterative algorithm in a strictly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space which also enjoys the Kadec-Klee property. To prove our main results, we need the following lemmas.
Lemma 2.1. Let E be a strictly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space and C a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of E. Let f be a bifunction from C × C to ℝ satisfying (A1)–(A4). Let r > 0 and x ∈ E. Then
- (a)
(see [2]). There exists z ∈ C such that
- (b)
(see [31]). Define a mapping by
- (1)
is single valued;
- (2)
is a firmly nonexpansive-type mapping; that is, for all x, y ∈ E,
- (3)
;
- (4)
EP (f) is closed and convex;
- (5)
is relatively nonexpansive.
Lemma 2.2 (see [29].)Let E be a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space and C a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of E. Let x ∈ E, and x0 ∈ C. Then x0 = ΠCx if and only if
Lemma 2.3 (see [29].)Let E be a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space and C a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of E, and x ∈ E. Then
Lemma 2.4 (see [27].)Let E be a reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space. Then one has the following
3. Main Results
Theorem 3.1. Let E be a strictly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space which also enjoys the Kadec-Klee property and C a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of E. Let f be a bifunction from C × C to ℝ satisfying (A1)–(A4) such that EP (f) ≠ ∅. Let {xn} be a sequence generated by the following manner:
Proof. In view of Lemma 2.1, we see that EP (f) is closed and convex. Next, we show that Cn is closed and convex. It is not hard to see that Cn is closed. Therefore, we only show that Cn is convex. It is obvious that C1 = C is convex. Suppose that Ch is convex for some h ∈ ℕ. Next, we show that Ch+1 is also convex for the same h. Let a, b ∈ Ch+1 and c = ta + (1 − t)b, where t ∈ (0,1). It follows that
Next, we show that EP (f) ⊂ Cn. It is obvious that EP (f) ⊂ C = C1. Suppose that EP (f) ⊂ Ch for some h ∈ ℕ. For any z ∈ EP (f) ⊂ Ch, we see from Lemma 2.1 that
Next, we show that {xn} is a convergent sequence and strongly converges to , where . Since , we see from Lemma 2.2 that
Finally, we prove that . Letting n → ∞ in (3.8), we see that
In the framework of the Hilbert spaces, we have the following.
Corollary 3.2. Let E be a Hilbert space and C a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of E. Let f be a bifunction from C × C to ℝ satisfying (A1)–(A4) such that EP (f) ≠ ∅. Let {xn} be a sequence generated by the following manner: