Volume 2012, Issue 1 494917
Research Article
Open Access

A New Class of Meromorphic Functions Associated with Spirallike Functions

Lei Shi

Corresponding Author

Lei Shi

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Anyang Normal University, Henan, Anyang 455002, China aynu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Zhi-Gang Wang

Zhi-Gang Wang

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Anyang Normal University, Henan, Anyang 455002, China aynu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Jing-Ping Yi

Jing-Ping Yi

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Anyang Normal University, Henan, Anyang 455002, China aynu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 November 2012
Citations: 2
Academic Editor: Alberto Cabada

Abstract

We introduce a new class of meromorphic functions associated with spirallike functions. Such results as subordination property, integral representation, convolution property, and coefficient inequalities are proved.

1. Introduction

Let Σ denote the class of functions f of the form
(1.1)
which are analytic in the punctured open unit disk
(1.2)
Let 𝒫 denote the class of functions p given by
(1.3)
which are analytic in 𝕌 and satisfy the condition
(1.4)
Let f, gΣ, where f is given by (1.1) and g is defined by
(1.5)
then the Hadamard product (or convolution) f*g is defined by
(1.6)
For two functions f and g, analytic in 𝕌, we say that the function f is subordinate to g in 𝕌 and write
(1.7)
if there exists a Schwarz function ω, which is analytic in 𝕌 with
(1.8)
such that
(1.9)
Indeed, it is known that
(1.10)
Furthermore, if the function g is univalent in 𝕌, then we have the following equivalence:
(1.11)
A function fΣ is said to be in the class 𝒮*(β) of meromorphic starlike functions of order β if it satisfies the inequality
(1.12)
For the real number β  (0 < β < 1), we know that
(1.13)
If the complex number α satisfies the condition
(1.14)
it can be easily verified that
(1.15)

We now introduce and investigate the following class of meromorphic functions.

Definition 1.1. A function fΣ is said to be in the class 𝒮α if it satisfies the inequality

(1.16)

Remark 1.2. For 0 < α < 1, the class 𝒮α is the familiar class of meromorphic starlike functions of order α.

Remark 1.3. If α = |α|eiψ  (−π/2 < ψ < π/2), then the condition (1.16) is equivalent to

(1.17)
which implies that f belongs to the class of meromorphic spirallike functions. Thus, the class of meromorphic spirallike functions is a special case of the class 𝒮α.

For some recent investigations on spirallike functions and related functions, see, for example, the earlier works [19] and the references cited in each of these earlier investigations.

Remark 1.4. The function

(1.18)
belongs to the class 𝒮α.

It is clear that

(1.19)
Then, for the function f given by (1.18), we know that
(1.20)
which implies that f𝒮α.

In this paper, we aim at deriving the subordination property, integral representation, convolution property, and coefficient inequalities of the function class 𝒮α.

2. Preliminary Results

In order to derive our main results, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 2.1. Let λ be a complex number. Suppose also that the sequence is defined by

(2.1)
Then
(2.2)

Proof. From (2.1), we know that

(2.3)
By virtue of (2.3), we find that
(2.4)
Thus, for k≧1, we deduce from (2.4) that
(2.5)
By virtue of (2.1) and (2.5), we get the desired assertion (2.2) of Lemma 2.1.

Lemma 2.2 (Jack′s Lemma [10]). Let ϕ be a nonconstant regular function in 𝕌. If |ϕ| attains its maximum value on the circle |z| = r < 1 at z0, then

(2.6)
for some real number t  (t≧1).

3. Main Results

We begin by deriving the following subordination property of functions belonging to the class 𝒮α.

Theorem 3.1. A function f𝒮α if and only if

(3.1)

Proof. Suppose that

(3.2)
We easily know that h𝒫, which implies that
(3.3)
where ω is analytic in 𝕌 with ω(0) = 0 and |ω(z)| < 1  (z𝕌).

It follows from (3.3) that

(3.4)
which is equivalent to the subordination relationship (3.1).

On the other hand, the above deductive process can be converse. The proof of Theorem 3.1 is thus completed.

Theorem 3.2. Let f𝒮α. Then

(3.5)
where ω is analytic in 𝕌 with ω(0) = 0 and |ω(z)| < 1  (z𝕌).

Proof. For f𝒮α, by Theorem 3.1, we know that (3.1) holds true. It follows that

(3.6)
where ω is analytic in 𝕌 with ω(0) = 0 and |ω(z)| < 1  (z𝕌).

We now find from (3.6) that

(3.7)
which, upon integration, yields
(3.8)
The assertion (3.5) of Theorem 3.2 can be easily derived from (3.8).

Theorem 3.3. Let f𝒮α. Then

(3.9)

Proof. Assume that f𝒮α. By Theorem 3.1, we know that (3.1) holds, which implies that

(3.10)
It is easy to see that the condition (3.10) can be written as follows:
(3.11)
We note that
(3.12)
Thus, by substituting (3.12) into (3.11), we get the desired assertion (3.9) of Theorem 3.3.

Theorem 3.4. Let λ = [Re(1/α) − 1]|α|. If f𝒮α, then

(3.13)
The inequality (3.13) is sharp for the function given by
(3.14)

Proof. Suppose that

(3.15)
We easily know that h𝒫.

If we put

(3.16)
it is known that
(3.17)
From (3.15), we have
(3.18)
We now set
(3.19)
It follows from (3.18) that
(3.20)
Combining (1.1), (3.16), and (3.20), we obtain
(3.21)
In view of (3.21), we get
(3.22)
(3.23)
From (3.17) and (3.22), we obtain
(3.24)
Moreover, we deduce from (3.17) and (3.23) that
(3.25)

Next, we define the sequence as follows:

(3.26)

In order to prove that

(3.27)
we make use of the principle of mathematical induction. By noting that
(3.28)
Therefore, assuming that
(3.29)
Combining (3.25) and (3.26), we get
(3.30)
Hence, by the principle of mathematical induction, we have
(3.31)
as desired.

By means of Lemma 2.1 and (3.26), we know that

(3.32)
Combining (3.31) and (3.32), we readily get the coefficient estimates asserted by Theorem 3.4.

For the sharpness, we consider the function f given by (3.14). A simple calculation shows that

(3.33)
Thus, the function f belongs to the class 𝒮α. Since 0 < α < 1, we have
(3.34)
Then f becomes
(3.35)
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.4.

Theorem 3.5. If fΣ satisfies the inequality

(3.36)
then f𝒮α.

Proof. To prove f𝒮α, it suffices to show that

(3.37)
which is equivalent to
(3.38)
From (3.36), we know that
(3.39)

Now, by the maximum modulus principle, we deduce from (1.1) and (3.39) that

(3.40)
which implies that the assertion of Theorem 3.5 holds.

Theorem 3.6. If fΣ satisfies the condition

(3.41)
then f𝒮α.

Proof. Define the function φ by

(3.42)
Then we see that φ is analytic in 𝕌 with φ(0) = 0.

It follows from (3.42) that

(3.43)
By differentiating both sides of (3.43) logarithmically, we obtain
(3.44)
From (3.41) and (3.44), we find that
(3.45)
Next, we claim that |φ(z)| < 1. Indeed, if not, there exists a point z0𝕌 such that
(3.46)
By Lemma 2.2, we have
(3.47)
Moreover, for z = z0, we find from (3.44) and (3.47) that
(3.48)
But (3.48) contradicts to (3.45). Therefore, we conclude that |φ(z)| < 1, that is
(3.49)
which shows that f𝒮α.

Acknowledgments

The present investigation was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation under Grants 11101053 and 11226088, the Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education under Grant 211118, the Excellent Youth Foundation of Educational Committee of Hunan Province under Grant 10B002, the Open Fund Project of the Key Research Institute of Philosophies and Social Sciences in Hunan Universities under Grants 11FEFM02 and 12FEFM02, and the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Educational Committee of Henan Province under Grant 12A110002 of the People’s Republic of China. The authors would like to thank the referees for their careful reading and valuable suggestions which essentially improved the quality of this paper.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.