Lanza F, Lemoli RM, Olivieri A, et al. Factors affecting successful mobilization with plerixafor: an Italian prospective survey in 215 patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma. Transfusion 2014;54:331-9.
The authors regret the errors in all of their tables. Please see the corrected tables below.
Table 1.
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics in the total population
Variable |
Subgroup |
Total |
Age (years) |
55.6 ± 11.6 (17-76) |
|
Sex |
|
215 |
Male |
114 (52.2) |
|
Female |
104 (47.8) |
Diagnosis and mobilization strategy |
|
|
MM |
|
84 (38.5)† |
Chemotherapy |
33 (42.0) |
|
Steady state |
46 (58.0) |
NHL |
|
108 (49.5) |
Chemotherapy |
41 (44.0) |
|
Steady state |
53 (56.0) |
HL |
|
23 (10.6) |
Chemotherapy |
5 (23.0) |
|
Steady state |
17 (77.0) |
Other |
3 (1.4) |
|
Mobilization category‡ |
|
207 |
Predicted PM |
64 (30.9) |
|
Proven PM |
143 (69.1) |
Mobilization strategy |
|
212 |
Chemotherapy |
86 (40.6) |
|
Steady state |
126 (59.4) |
- * Data are reported as mean ± SD (range) or number (%).
- † Note that not all details were available for all patients. Percentages are given accordingly.
- ‡ According to GITMO criteria.21
Table 2.
Diagnosis and mobilization characteristics by endpoint (CD34+ cells/kg or peak CD34+ cells × 106/L status)
|
CD34+ cells/kg |
CD34+ cells × 106/L |
Nonmobilizer (<2 × 106cells/kg) |
Mobilizer (>2 × 106cells/kg) |
Nonmobilizer (<20 × 106 cells/L) |
Mobilizer (>20 × 106 cells/L) |
<0.5 |
0.5-1 |
1-2 |
2-5 |
>5 |
<10 |
10-20 |
<20 |
Total population |
46 (21.6) |
6(2.8) |
16 (7.5) |
84 (39.4) |
61 (28.7) |
38 (19.6) |
38 (19.6) |
118 (60.8) |
Diagnosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHL |
29 (27.1) |
5 (4.7) |
11 (10.3) |
62 (57.9) |
|
28 (29.8) |
19 (20.2) |
47 (50) |
HL |
6 (26.1) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.3) |
16 (69.6) |
|
4 (20.0) |
5 (25.0) |
11 (55) |
MM |
10 (12.4) |
1 (1.3) |
3 (3.8) |
19 (23.8) |
47 (58.7)† |
6 (7.8) |
13 (16.9) |
58 (75.3) |
Mobilization category‡ |
|
|
|
|
Predicted PM |
14 (22.0) |
|
49 (78.0) |
|
18 (34) |
|
35 (66) |
Proven PM |
49 (35.0) |
|
90 (65.0) |
|
58 (42) |
|
80 (58) |
Mobilization strategy |
|
|
|
|
Chemotherapy |
21 (26.0) |
|
59 (74.0) |
|
23 (31) |
|
52 (69) |
Steady state |
37 (32.0) |
|
80 (68.0) |
|
49 (44) |
|
62 (56) |
Diagnosis and mobilization strategy |
|
|
|
|
NHL |
|
|
|
|
Chemotherapy |
24 (45.0) |
|
29 (55.0) |
|
30 (61) |
|
19 (39) |
Steady state |
12 (29.0) |
|
29 (71.0) |
|
14 (36) |
|
25 (64) |
HL |
|
|
|
|
Chemotherapy |
4 (24.0) |
|
13 (76.0) |
|
7 (44) |
|
9 (56) |
Steady state |
2 (40.0) |
|
3 (60.0) |
|
1 (33) |
|
2 (67) |
MM |
|
|
|
|
Chemotherapy |
7 (16.0) |
|
38 (84.0) |
|
11 (25) |
|
33 (75) |
Steady state |
7 (21.0) |
|
26 (79.0) |
|
8 (25) |
|
24 (75) |
- * Data are reported as number (%).
- † At least 4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (cut off for MM patients).
- ‡ According to GITMO criteria.21
Table 3.
Significant predictive factors in the total population
Endpoint |
Factor |
Categories |
Nonmobilizer |
Mobilizer |
p value univariate |
p value multivariate |
CD34+ cells/kg |
Diagnosis |
NHL |
45 (42.1) |
62 (57.9) |
0.0016 |
NS |
HL |
7 (30.4) |
16 (69.6) |
MM |
14 (17.5) |
66 (82.5) |
Mobilization status |
Predicted |
14 (22.0) |
49 (78.0) |
NS |
Not considered |
Proven |
49 (35.0) |
90 (65.0) |
Mobilization strategy |
Chemotherapy |
21 (26.0) |
59 (74.0) |
|
|
Steady state |
37 (32.0) |
80 (68.0) |
NS |
Not considered |
PLTs (×109/L) |
Number |
59 |
140 |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
Mean ± SD |
116.48 ± 69.83 |
176.52 ± 89.33 |
≤100 |
22 (49) |
23 (51) |
0.0013 |
<0.0001 |
>100 |
37 (24) |
117 (76) |
≤140* |
38 (44) |
49 (56) |
0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
>140* |
21 (19) |
91 (81) |
Radiotherapy |
No |
46 (27) |
122 (73) |
0.028 |
0.044 |
Yes |
15 (47) |
17 (53) |
CD34+ cells × 106/L |
Diagnosis |
NHL |
47 (50) |
47 (50) |
NS |
NS |
HL |
9 (45) |
11 (55) |
MM |
19 (25) |
58 (75) |
Mobilization category† |
Predicted |
18 (34) |
35 (66) |
NS |
Not considered |
Proven |
58 (42) |
80 (58) |
Mobilization strategy |
Chemotherapy |
23 (31) |
52 (69) |
|
|
Steady state |
49 (44) |
62 (56) |
NS |
Not considered |
PLTs (×109/L) |
Number |
71 |
117 |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
Mean ± SD |
122.56 ± 67.54 |
178.32 ± 89.50 |
≤100 |
26 (60) |
17 (40) |
0.0005 |
0.0004 |
>100 |
45 (31) |
100 (69) |
≤143* |
46 (54) |
39 (46) |
<0.0001 |
0.0002 |
>143* |
25 (24) |
78 (76) |
Fludarabine |
No |
63 (36) |
111 (64) |
0.0009 |
0.0175 |
Yes |
12 (80) |
3 (20) |
- * Cutoff obtained by ROC curve analysis.
- † According to GITMO criteria.21
Table 4.
Significant predictive factors in the predicted PM population (n = 64)
Endpoint |
Factor |
Categories |
Nonmobilizer |
Mobilizer |
p value |
Univariate |
Multivariate |
CD34+ cells/kg |
Diagnosis |
NHL |
10 (33) |
20 (67) |
NS |
NS |
HL |
1 (13) |
7 (87) |
MM |
3 (12) |
22 (88) |
Mobilization strategy |
Chemotherapy |
9 (32) |
19 (68) |
|
|
Steady state |
5 (14) |
30 (86) |
NS |
Not considered |
PLTs (×109/L) |
N |
14 |
47 |
0.0052 |
0.043 |
Mean ± SD |
101.71 ± 77.98 |
193.38 ± 109.88 |
≤100 |
7 (50) |
7 (50) |
0.011 |
NS |
>100 |
7 (15) |
40 (85) |
≤103* |
9 (53) |
8 (47) |
0.0005 |
0.027 |
>103* |
5 (11) |
39 (89) |
Fludarabine |
No |
10 (18) |
47 (82) |
0.0014 |
NS |
Yes |
4 (80) |
1 (20) |
WBCs |
N |
14 |
47 |
0.0199 |
NS |
Median |
6.14 |
15.36 |
CD34+ cells × 106/L |
Diagnosis |
NHL |
11 (44) |
14 (56) |
NS |
Not estimated |
HL |
2 (40) |
3 (60) |
MM |
5 (22) |
18 (78) |
Mobilization strategy |
Chemotherapy |
8 (35) |
15 (65) |
|
Steady state |
10 (33) |
20 (67) |
NS |
PLTs (×109/L) |
Number |
17 |
34 |
0.046 |
Mean ± SD |
126.18 ± 82.17 |
189.76 ± 113.53 |
≤100 |
6 (50) |
6 (50) |
NS |
>100 |
11 (28) |
28 (72) |
≤143* |
11 (55) |
9 (45) |
0.0084 |
>143* |
6 (19) |
25 (81) |
Fludarabine |
No |
13 (28) |
34 (72) |
0.0033 |
Yes |
5 (100) |
0 (0) |
WBCs |
Number |
17 |
34 |
0.0021 |
Median |
4.70 |
22.68 |
Neutrophil count (×109/L) |
Number |
17 |
29 |
0.012 |
Median |
3.24 |
8.5 |
- * Cut-off obtained by ROC curve analysis.
Table 5.
Significant predictive factors in the proven PM population (n = 144)
|
Factor |
Categories |
Nonmobilizer |
Mobilizer |
p value univariate |
p value multivariate |
CD34+ cells/kg |
Diagnosis |
NHL |
30 (43) |
39 (57) |
0.034 |
NS |
HL |
6 (40) |
9 (60) |
MM |
11 (21) |
41 (79) |
Mobilization type |
Chemotherapy |
12 (25) |
37 (75) |
|
|
Steady state |
32 (40) |
50 (61) |
NS |
Not considered |
PLTs (×109/L) |
Number |
45 |
90 |
0.001 |
0.0017 |
Mean ± SD |
121.07 ± 67.37 |
163.61 ± 70.05 |
≤100 |
15 (48) |
16 (52) |
0.043 |
0.027 |
>100 |
30 (29) |
74 (71) |
≤129* |
24 (46) |
28 (54) |
0.012 |
0.0069 |
>129* |
21 (25) |
62 (75) |
Sex |
Male |
21 (27) |
56 (73) |
0.028 |
NS |
Female |
28 (45) |
34 (55) |
CD34+ cells × 106/L |
Diagnosis |
NHL |
36 (53) |
32 (47) |
NS |
NS |
HL |
7 (47) |
8 (53) |
MM |
14 (27) |
38 (73) |
Mobilization type |
Chemotherapy |
15 (31) |
34 (69) |
|
|
Steady state |
39 (48) |
42 (52) |
NS |
0.0166 |
PLTs (×109/L) |
N |
54 |
80 |
0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
Mean ± SD |
121.42 ± 63.09 |
168.91 ± 71.60 |
≤100 |
20 (65) |
11 (35) |
0.0017 |
0.0003 |
>100 |
34 (33) |
69 (67) |
≤142* |
35 (54) |
30 (46) |
0.0019 |
0.0013 |
>142* |
19 (27) |
50 (73) |
- * Cutoff obtained by ROC curve analysis.