Volume 38, Issue 1 pp. 520-529
STANDARD ARTICLE
Open Access

Predictors of blood ionized calcium concentration in sick adult cattle

Tolga Karapinar

Corresponding Author

Tolga Karapinar

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey

Correspondence

Tolga Karapinar, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Kenan Cagri Tumer

Kenan Cagri Tumer

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Peter D. Constable

Peter D. Constable

College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sébastien M. C. Buczinski

Sébastien M. C. Buczinski

Département des Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 December 2023

Abstract

Background

Data on the factors affecting blood ionized calcium concentration (ciCa2+) and diagnostic performance of serum total calcium concentration (ctCa) measurements to detect abnormal blood iCa2+ status are lacking in sick adult cattle.

Objective

Assess the association of ciCa2+ with venous blood pH, plasma concentrations of chloride (cCl), sodium (cNa), and potassium (cK), and ctCa, and total protein, albumin, and globulin concentrations in sick adult cattle.

Animals

Two-hundred and sixty-five adult cattle (≥1-year-old) with different diseases.

Methods

Prospective study. Whole blood pH, ciCa2+, cNa, cK, and cCl were measured using a blood gas and electrolyte analyzer, whereas ctCa, and total protein, and albumin concentrations were determined using an autoanalyzer. The relationship between ciCa2+ and venous blood pH, plasma cCl, cNa, cK, and ctCa, and total protein, albumin, and globulin concentrations was investigated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for ctCa for diagnosis of abnormal ciCa2+.

Results

Sensitivity of ctCa measurements to detect abnormal ciCa2+ was 66.0% whereas specificity of ctCa measurements was 72.3%. Serum total calcium concentration measurements accounted for 42% of adjusted blood ionized calcium (iCa2+7.40) concentration variance. Plasma cCl, and cK had explanatory power of ciCa2+7.40, accounting for an additional 21% and 9% of the variance, respectively.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Serum tCa measurements failed to accurately predict blood iCa2+ status in ill adult cattle. Serum tCa concentrations and plasma cCl were the strongest predictors of ciCa2+ in sick adult cattle.

Abbreviations

  • Ca2+
  • calcium
  • cCl
  • chloride concentration
  • ciCa2+
  • blood ionized calcium concentration
  • ciCa2+7.40
  • blood iCa2+ concentration adjusted to pH = 7.40
  • cK
  • potassium concentration
  • cNa
  • sodium concentration
  • ctCa
  • serum total calcium concentration
  • CV
  • coefficient of variation
  • iCa2+
  • ionized calcium
  • NLR
  • negative likelihood ratio
  • PLR
  • positive likelihood ratio
  • Se
  • sensitivity
  • SID
  • strong ion difference
  • Sp
  • specificity
  • tCa
  • total calcium
  • VIF
  • variation inflation factor
  • 1 INTRODUCTION

    Disorders of calcium (Ca2+), especially hypocalcemia, are important problems in bovine medicine.1, 2 Periparturient hypocalcemia may lead to various metabolic and infectious diseases in dairy cows, and hypocalcemia is a common clinicopathologic finding in cattle with systemic diseases or acute toxemic conditions.1-3 Calcium exists 3 different fractions in plasma or serum: protein-bound calcium, ionized calcium (iCa2+), and complexed calcium.1, 4 Ionized Ca2+ is the free and biologically active form of Ca2+ in the blood. Although blood iCa2+ concentrations (ciCa2+) can be measured using conventional blood gas analyzers in veterinary hospitals, such measurements may be unavailable and technically challenging especially in farm conditions. Therefore, clinicians continue to rely on measurement of serum total calcium (tCa) concentration (ctCa) to assess calcium status in adult cattle.

    Plasma iCa2+ is primarily dependent on ctCa, with ctCa explaining 64% to 86% of the variation in iCa2+ in plasma or serum from adult cattle.5-7 A recent study in critically ill calves indicated that plasma iCa2+ concentration was associated with plasma tCa, venous blood pH, plasma chloride (cCl), serum magnesium, and plasma L-lactate (R2 = 0.69) concentrations but not plasma albumin.4 Apart from tCa, pH has the next largest effect on the iCa2+ concentration of calf plasma8 and cow plasma,9 with pH-corrective equations for plasma iCa2+ concentration being similar to those used for human plasma.4 Metabolic acidosis usually develops in ill neonatal calves, but hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis is a more common clinicopathologic finding in sick adult cattle.3 Different clinicopathologic findings between ill calves and sick adult cattle may affect blood iCa2+ concentration in a different manner. Therefore, the relative effect of blood pH and plasma cCl and other electrolytes on blood iCa2+ needs to be accurately determined in sick adult cattle. In clinical settings, we commonly observed discrepancy between serum tCa and blood iCa2+ results. For this reason, we hypothesized that tCa concentration in sick adult cattle was not a good predictor of blood iCa2+ concentration. Our objectives were therefore to: (a) determine the relationship between serum tCa concentrations and ciCa2+ in adult cattle affected by various diseases, (b) investigate the association between venous blood pH, plasma cCl, sodium (cNa), potassium (cK), and ctCa, and total protein, albumin, and globulin concentrations and ciCa2+ in sick adult cattle and (c) determine the percentage of blood iCa2+ fraction in serum tCa in adult cattle with different diseases.

    2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

    2.1 Animals

    Two-hundred and sixty-five cattle (≥1-year-old) with different diseases referred to Firat University Teaching and Training Animal Hospital between January 2018 and April 2019 were recruited in this prospective study of a convenience sample. Sample size was calculated using R pwr package. Assuming a minimal coefficient of determination of the final multivariable model of 0.1 and a maximum of 10 different predictors, a minimal sample size of 193 samples was required (90% power, 5% type 1 error). Cattle with various systemic disorders were included in the study to obtain a wide range of venous blood pH and serum electrolyte, tCa, total protein, albumin, and globulin concentrations. Cattle that received calcium solutions within 48 hours before collecting blood samples were excluded from the study. The clinical diagnosis was obtained based on clinical diagnostic evaluation. When more than 1 disease was present, the main diagnosis was retained for that specific case for descriptive purposes. This study was approved by the Firat University Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation (Permit number: 179).

    2.2 Blood samples

    Blood samples were anaerobically collected from the left or right jugular vein of cattle into blood gas syringes (Pico 50, Radiometer Medical ApS, Brønshøj, Denmark) containing 80 IU dry, electrolyte-balanced heparin and plain tubes. The volume of the blood gas syringe was 0.5-2 mL, and approximately 1.5 mL of a blood sample was aspirated into a syringe in all cases except for 2 cases in which 0.5 mL of blood sample was collected because of challenges in restraining the animal. Whole blood pH, ciCa2+, cNa, cK, and cCl were measured within 10 minutes of blood collection using a Radiometer ABL80 analyzer. Venous blood pH was measured using a glass pH electrode, whereas ciCa2+, cNa, cK, and cCl were measured using direct ion selective electrode technology. Values for venous blood pH corrected for rectal temperature were not used in this study. The strong ion difference (SID3) in mEq/L was calculated from the cNa, cK, and cCl: SID3 = cNa + cK − cCl.10 Hematocrit measurement of venous blood samples was performed once using capillary microhematocrit tubes after centrifugation for 5 minutes. Blood collected into plain tubes was allowed to clot and centrifuged at 1500×g for 15 minutes. Serum was harvested and stored −20°C until analyzed within 7 days of collection. Serum total protein (biuret), albumin (bromocresol green), and tCa (arsenazo dye binding) concentrations were measured using a traditional bench-top autoanalyzer (SIEMENS Advia 1800, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Serum globulin concentrations were calculated as the difference between serum total protein and albumin concentrations. The following equation was used to calculate the percentage of blood iCa2+ in tCa, iCa2+ percentage = [iCa2+ (mmol/L) × 100]/tCa (mmol/L), with mg/dL of serum tCa being multiplied by 0.2495 to convert into mmol/L. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of the Radiometer ABL80 analyzer for venous blood pH and ciCa2+, cNa, cK, and cCl measurements was determined from 8 measurements of the same sample during 1 day. The inter-assay CV of the autoanalyzer for serum total protein, albumin, and tCa measurements was calculated from 10 stored sample aliquots from the same animal that were measured on 10 consecutive days.

    2.3 Evaluation of serum total calcium concentration diagnostic performance

    The diagnostic performance of ctCa was assessed for correctly predicting blood iCa2+ status. The reference interval for ciCa2+ was 1.06-1.26 mmol/L.2, 11, 12 The reference range for ctCa concentration was 2.00-2.60 mmol/L.13 Cattle were categorized as hypocalcemic, normocalcemic, or hypercalcemic on the basis of ciCa2+ and ctCa concentrations. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and positive likelihood ratios (PLR) were calculated for ctCa for diagnosis of abnormal ciCa2+. Positive likelihood ratios >10 indicate that a positive test is good at diagnosis of abnormal ciCa2+, whereas NLR <0.1 indicates that a negative test is good at ruling out a diagnosis of abnormal ciCa2+.14, 15 Diagnostic discordance was determined by use of the following equation: diagnostic discordance = (number of samples with diagnostic disagreement between measured ciCa2+ and ctCa/total number of samples) x 100.16 Diagnostic performance of ctCa was calculated using MedCalc (software version 20.110, MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium).

    2.4 Statistical analysis

    Analyses were performed using the R open access statistical software (R Core Team [2020]. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Two different types of analyses were performed based on a previous study4 that proposed correcting ionized calcium to a pH of 7.40 using the equation:
    iCa 7.40 = iCa × 10 0.23 × 7.4 pH m ,
    where pHm is the venous blood pH of the cow. The same approach therefore was taken for determining the association between clinical variables and iCa2+ or iCa2+7.40 to evaluate the association between clinical variables (breed, age, milking status, disease category, sex) using univariable linear regression analysis. Then, a specific modeling approach was used for determining the relationship between iCa2+ and selected plasma or serum variables. The distribution of the different continuous predictors was visually assessed and tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Small deviations were observed from normality but were not significantly improved after either log transformation or Box-Cox transformation. For this reason, continuous variables were described as median, range and interquartile range as previously reported.4 After evaluating the risk of multicollinearity using Spearman rho analysis, when a pair of potential predictors had a correlation ≥0.7 only 1 of them was kept as a potential regressor. Univariable analyses then were performed to detect variables associated with ciCa2+ or ciCa2+7.40. Predictors with univariable P values <.10 were kept for the multivariable regression analysis.
    Two different models were built using ciCa or ciCa7.40 as the dependent variable and other biochemical predictors using the general framework:
    iCa or iCa 7.40 = α 0 + i = 1 n α i × X i + ε ,
    where α are the coefficients associated with the covariate vector X of the different biochemical variables and ε the model residuals. A manual backward stepwise strategy was used after including all significant variables found in univariable analysis and removing variables with P values ≥.05. The final model was the first model with all remaining significant variables (ie, P < .05). Specific attention was paid to the assumptions of the linear regression model (ie, homoscedasticity and normally-distributed residuals). The residual distribution was observed visually and considered adequate if it appeared to be normally distributed. Outliers were defined using QQplot, and standardized residuals were specifically investigated and their impact assessed after removing them from the dataset. This impact was judged negligible and therefore no specific model adjustment was performed. The fit of the models was assessed using adjusted R-squared. The relative importance of each individual independent variable in the model was assessed determining the partial R-squared of the variable as well as global R-squared of the model and variation inflation factor (VIF). Results were considered significant when P values were <.05.

    3 RESULTS

    3.1 Study population

    Four cattle breeds were included: Simmental or Simmental cross-breed (n = 238), Swiss Brown or Swiss Brown cross-breed (n = 14), Holstein or Holstein cross-breed (n = 11) and Jersey cattle (n = 2). There were 240 female and 25 male cattle, ranging from 1 to 12 years in age (median, 3.6 years). Ninety-three animals were <3 years old (35%), 90 were between 3 and <5 years old (34%) and 82 cows were >5 years old (31%). A total of 184 of 240 (76.7%) cows were in lactation and 26 cows were ≤3 weeks postpartum.

    3.2 Selected blood acid-base and serum biochemical results

    The range, median, and interquartile range of venous blood pH, ciCa2+, plasma cCl, cNa, cK, and ctCa, and total protein, albumin, and globulin concentrations are presented in Table 1. The intra-assay CVs of the Radiometer ABL80 analyzer for venous blood pH and ciCa2+, cCl, cNa, and cK were 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.7%, 0.4%, and 0.3%, respectively. The inter-assay CVs for the ctCa, and total protein, and albumin concentrations were 3.4%, 4.3%, and 5.2%, respectively.

    TABLE 1. The range, median, and interquartile range of venous blood pH, ionized calcium, plasma chloride, sodium, potassium, serum total calcium, total protein, albumin, and globulin concentrations in 265 sick adult cattle.
    Variable Range (median) Interquartile range
    Blood iCa2+ (mmol/L) 0.41-1.40 (1.10) 1.00-1.17
    Serum tCa (mmol/L) 1.11-2.67 (2.03) 1.87-2.16
    Blood pH 7.16-7.69 (7.48) 7.44-7.52
    Plasma chloride (mmol/L) 45-113 (97) 90-102
    Plasma sodium (mmol/L) 118-152 (139) 135-142
    Plasma potassium (mmol/L) 1.83-5.36 (3.64) 3.21-3.91
    Plasma SID3 (mEq/L) 25.7-76.8 (45.9) 42.5-50.4
    Serum total protein (g/dL) 3.9-10.6 (7.0) 6.3-7.8
    Serum albumin (g/dL) 1.7-4.4 (3.2) 2.8-3.4
    Serum globulin (g/dL) 1.3-8.1 (3.8) 3.1-4.6
    • Abbreviations: iCa2+, ionized calcium; SID3, strong ion difference; tCa, total calcium.

    3.3 Clinical diagnoses in the study population

    Cattle were diagnosed with various diseases (gastrointestinal disorders [n = 164; abomasitis, abomasal impaction, abomasal ulcer, acute ruminal lactic acidosis, cecal dilatation, chronic rumen acidosis, enteritis, ileus, intestinal invagination, omasum constipation, right-displaced abomasum, simple indigestion, salmonellosis, traumatic reticuloperitonitis or perireticular abscess, vagus indigestion, peritonitis], respiratory disorders [n = 48; aspiration pneumonia, laryngitis, laryngeal edema, pleuropneumonia, pneumonia, tracheal mass], systemic disorders [n = 21; theileriosis, anaplasmosis, malignant catarrhal fever, bovine ephemeral fever, sepsis, mucosal disease, hypovitaminosis A, cerebrocortical necrosis], acute mastitis [n = 7], reproductive disorders [n = 6; acute metritis, retained fetal membranes], metabolic disorders [n = 12; hepatic lipidosis, hypomagnesemia, ketosis, milk fever], and others [n = 7; traumatic pericarditis, laminitis, cystitis]).

    The univariable analyses between iCa2+, iCa7.40 and clinical predictors are presented in Table 2. Blood iCa2+ concentration and ciCa7.40 were negatively associated with age, with older cows having lower ciCa2+ results than cows <3 years of age (Figure 1). Differences also were observed based on the type of disease and sex with males having higher ciCa2+ than females (Table 2).

    TABLE 2. The results of univariable analyses between concentrations of ionized calcium (iCa2+), iCa2+7.40 and clinical predictors in 265 sick adult cattle.
    Unadjusted blood iCa2+ concentration Adjusted blood iCa2+ concentration to pH = 7.40
    Characteristic N Beta 95% CI P-value Characteristic Beta 95% CI P-value
    Breed 265 .64 Breed .65
    Simmental 238 (89.8%) Simmental
    Brown Swiss 14 (5.3%) 0.01 −0.07 to 0.09 1 Brown Swiss 0.02 −0.06 to 0.09 .97
    Holstein 11 (4.1%) 0.03 −0.06 to 0.12 .89 Holstein 0.02 −0.07 to 0.11 .97
    Jersey 2 (0.8%) −0.11 −0.31 to 0.09 .73 Jersey −0.11 −0.31 to 0.09 .69
    Age 265 <.001 Age <.001
    <3y 93 (35.0%) <3y
    3y to <5y 90 (34.0%) −0.06 −0.10 to −0.02 .003 3y to <5y −0.06 −0.10 to −0.02 .002
    5y or more 82 (31.0%) −0.08 −0.13 to −0.04 <.001 5y or more −0.07 −0.12 to −0.03 <.001
    Diseases 265 <.001 Diseases <.001
    Gastrointestinal 164 (61.9%) Gastrointestinal
    Respiratory 48 (18.1%) 0.08 0.04 to 0.13 .01 Respiratory 0.08 0.03 to 0.12 .01
    Systemic 21 (8%) 0.08 0.01 to 0.14 .24 Systemic 0.06 −0.01 to 0.12 .56
    Metabolic 12 (4.5%) 0.06 −0.02 to 0.14 .79 Metabolic 0.04 −0.04 to 0.13 .93
    Mastitis 7 (2.6%) 0.01 0.04 to 0.25 .11 Mastitis 0.15 0.05 to 0.26 .07
    Others 7 (2.6%) 0.01 −0.10 to 0.11 1 Others 0.01 −0.10 to 0.11 1
    Reproductive 6 (2.3%) 0.04 −0.07 to 0.16 .99 Reproductive 0.05 −0.06 to 0.16 .98
    Milking status 240 .74 Milking status .68
    No 56 (23.3%) No
    Yes 184 (76.7%) −0.01 −0.05 to 0.04 Yes −0.01 −0.05 to 0.03
    Gender 265 .01 Gender .05
    Female 240 (90.6%) Female
    Male 25 (9.4%) 0.08 0.02 to 0.13 Male 0.08 0.00 to 0.12
    • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; iCa2+, ionized calcium.
    Details are in the caption following the image
    The distribution of blood ionized calcium (iCa2+) concentration by age category in sick adult cattle.

    3.4 Evaluation of serum total calcium concentration diagnostic performance

    In our population of 265 cattle, 96 (36.2%), 159 (60.0%), and 10 (3.8%) were classified as hypocalcemic, normocalcemic, and hypercalcemic on the basis of ciCa2+, respectively, whereas 113 (42.6%), 151 (57.0%), and 1 (0.4%) cattle were hypocalcemic, normocalcemic, and hypercalcemic on the basis of ctCa, respectively. Sensitivity, Sp, NLR, and PLR for ctCa measurements for the diagnosis of abnormal ciCa2+ are presented in Table 3. To detect blood ionized hypocalcemia, Se of ctCa measurements with reference range of 2.00-2.60 mmol/L was 72.9% (95% confidential interval, 62.9-81.5). The diagnostic discordance between ctCa and ciCa2+ measurements was 30.2%. Diagnostic discordance of ctCa measurements in cattle with blood ionized hypocalcemia was 27.1%.

    TABLE 3. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of serum total calcium measurements for diagnosis of abnormal blood ionized calcium concentrations.
    Reference interval for tCa Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PLR (95% CI) NLR (95% CI)
    2.00–2.60 mmol/L (n = 265) 66.0% (56.2%–75.0%) 72.3% (64.7%–79.1%) 2.39 (1.79-3.18) 0.47 (0.35-0.62)
    • Note: Reference interval for serum total calcium concentrations were shown in the table.
    • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; tCa, serum total calcium.

    3.5 Relationships among venous blood pH, chloride, sodium, potassium, serum total calcium, albumin, globulin, and blood ionized calcium

    The individual relationships between ciCa2+ and ctCa, and serum albumin concentrations, venous blood pH, and plasma cCl are shown in Figure 2. Correlations among ciCa2+, venous blood pH, ctCa, serum albumin concentrations, serum globulin concentrations, serum total protein concentrations, plasma cCl, plasma cK, and plasma cNa are presented in Figure 3. The correlations between ciCa2+ and ctCa, plasma cCl, and cK were positive whereas, the correlations between ciCa2+ and blood pH and plasma SID3 were negative. The univariable analysis and multivariable analysis results of blood variable associations with ciCa2+ and ciCa2+7.40 are presented in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. The median percentage of blood iCa2+ fraction in total serum calcium was 53.8%, ranging from 24.3% to 68.8%. The correlation between predictors showed that sodium and chloride, as well as globulin and total protein were highly correlated (r = 0.70 and 0.91, respectively). Therefore, only chloride and globulin were kept for regression analysis. The VIF analysis did not identify problems of multicollinearity (VIF < 5).

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Scatterplots of serum total calcium concentrations, serum albumin concentrations, venous blood pH, and plasma chloride concentrations with blood ionized calcium concentrations. Blood ionized calcium concentration is presented on y-axis.
    Details are in the caption following the image
    Spearman correlations among ciCa2+, venous blood pH, serum total calcium concentrations, serum albumin concentrations, serum globulin concentrations, serum total protein concentrations, plasma chloride concentrations, plasma potassium concentrations, plasma sodium concentrations, and plasma strong ion difference (SID3).
    TABLE 4. Results of univariable analyses of the association of selected blood, plasma, or serum analytes with blood ionized calcium (iCa2+) concentration in 265 adult cattle with different diseases.
    Unadjusted blood iCa2+ Blood iCa2+ concentration adjusted to pH = 7.40
    Variable Beta 95% CI P-value Variable Beta 95% CI P-value
    Potassium 0.14 0.11 to 0.17 <.001 Potassium 0.12 0.09 to 0.15 <.001
    Chloride 0.01 0.01 to 0.01 <.001 Chloride 0.01 0.01 to 0.01 <.001
    Blood pH −0.76 −1.00 to −0.52 <.001 Blood pH −0.25 −0.50 to 0.00 .05
    tCa 0.44 0.38 to 0.50 <.001 tCa 0.44 0.38 to 0.49 <.001
    Globulin 0 −0.02 to 0.01 .55 Globulin 0 −0.02 to 0.01 .78
    Albumin 0.01 −0.03 to 0.04 .77 Albumin −0.01 −0.04 to 0.03 .75
    Hematocrit −0.01 −0.01 to 0.00 <.001 Hematocrit −0.01 −0.01 to 0.00 <.001
    • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; iCa2+, ionized calcium; tCa, serum total calcium.
    TABLE 5. The results of multivariable analysis of the association between selected blood, plasma, or serum analytes of blood ionized calcium (iCa2+) concentration with blood ionized calcium concentration in 265 adult cattle with different clinical disorders.
    Unadjusted blood iCa2+ Adjusted blood iCa2+ concentration to pH = 7.40
    Variable Coefficient SE P value Partial R2 VIF Variable Coefficient SE P value Partial R2 VIF
    Intercept 1.32 0.586 .03 Intercept −2.784 0.600 <.001
    tCa (mmol/L) 0.409 0.022 <.001 0.393 1.17 tCa (mmol/L) 0.426 0.022 <.001 0.422 1.17
    Chloride (mmol/L) 0.005 0.001 <.001 0.208 1.79 Chloride (mmol/L) 0.005 0.001 <.001 0.207 1.79
    Potassium (mmol/L) 0.033 0.011 .003 0.104 1.99 Potassium (mmol/L) 0.036 0.012 .003 0.085 1.99
    Albumin (g/dL) −0.060 0.010 <.001 0.008 1.19 Albumin (g/dL) −0.064 0.010 <.001 0.014 1.19
    Blood pH −0.200 0.075 .01 0.040 1.30
    R2 0.752 R2 0.730
    Adjusted R2 0.748 Adjusted R2 0.725
    • Abbreviations: iCa2+, ionized calcium, tCa, serum total calcium; VIF, variation inflation factor.

    4 DISCUSSION

    The ability of ctCa measurements to accurately predict abnormal ciCa2+ was assessed in adult cattle with a variety of clinical diseases. Our findings indicated that ctCa measurements failed to accurately predict ciCa2+ in ill adult cattle. Serum tCa concentration measurements accounted for only 42% of ciCa2+7.40 variance. Plasma cCl, and cK were also predictive of ciCa2+7.40, accounting for an additional 21% and 9% of the variance, respectively.

    Serum total calcium concentration measurements usually have been used to assess calcium status in bovine practice although Se, Sp, PLR, NLR, and diagnostic discordance of ctCa measurements against ciCa2+ measurements have not been previously calculated in cattle with different clinical disorders. In our study, the diagnostic discordance between ctCa and ciCa2+ was 30.2%, indicating that ctCa measurements did not correctly predict iCa2+ status in at least 30.2% of cattle with different disorders. Similarly, diagnostic discordance of ctCa in dogs previously was determined as 27.0%16 or 18.5%. In the latter study, 80% of dogs had normal ciCa2+ concentrations.17 In our study, the diagnostic discordance between ctCa measurements and ciCa2+ measurements was high in sick adult cattle with blood ionized hypocalcemia (27.1%). The reference range of 2.00-2.60 mmol/L for ctCa showed poor sensitivity (66.0%). The low PLR values (2.39) showed that most cattle with abnormal blood iCa2+ status were incorrectly identified as normocalcemic by ctCa measurements. In our study, NLR > 0.1 (0.47) for ctCa measurements showed that ctCa measurement is not a good test to rule out a diagnosis of abnormal ciCa2+. Overall, our results suggest that ctCa measurements for correctly predicting ciCa2+ had poor diagnostic performance in sick cattle. From a clinical view, the use of ctCa measurements instead of ciCa2+ determination may cause misclassification of calcium status in cattle with clinical disorders. Thus, ciCa2+ measurements should be performed whenever available.

    Data regarding the reference interval of ciCa2+ in cattle is limited. The reference interval of ciCa2+ used in our study was taken from another study.11 In that study, 50 healthy Swedish red and white breed cows were used to determine a reference range for serum iCa2+ concentration using a different calcium ion analyzer from that used in our study. Additional studies are necessary to determine the reference range of ciCa2+ in healthy cattle populations using calcium ion analyzers available today. Different reference ranges of ctCa in cattle have been used in bovine clinics. The reference interval of ctCa used in our study was taken from a textbook.13 The same reference range for ctCa has been used in the clinic where the study was performed. Moreover, subclinical hypocalcemia in periparturient dairy cows was defined as ctCa <2.00 mmol/L in some studies.18, 19 Similarly, the lower value of the reference interval for ctCa was 2.00 mmol/L in our study.

    Blood iCa2+ concentration measurements were performed within 10 minutes of blood collection, but serum samples were stored at −20°C for ctCa measurements until analyzed within 7 days of collection. It was shown that whole blood samples may be stored at least 14 days at 4°C in plain or lithium heparin tubes with no changes in ctCa concentrations in cattle.20 Storage of serum at −80°C had no effect on ctCa for up to 12 months in cattle.20 The results of that study indicate that storage condition and timing of serum samples did not have an effect on ctCa measurements in our study.

    Blood iCa2+ concentration in critically ill neonatal calves was mainly dependent on plasma tCa concentration, plasma cCl, and venous blood pH.4 Total calcium, serum cCl, and albumin concentrations were the most important variables affecting ciCa2+ in dogs and cats with different clinical disorders where the effect of blood pH on ciCa2+ was not evaluated.17, 21 The multivariable regression model in our study provided valuable information on the relationships between selected variables and ciCa2+. Our results indicated that ctCa, plasma cCl, and cK were positively associated with ciCa2+ in adult cattle affected by different diseases whereas a negative association was found between serum albumin concentration and ciCa2+.

    Apart from ctCa, plasma cCl had the strongest association with ciCa2+ in adult cattle in our study with different clinical disorders. An overlooked physicochemical phenomenon is that an increase in serum cCl directly increases the number of chloride ions bound to bovine albumin,22 and the increased chloride binding displaces calcium from adjacent electrostatic binding sites, thereby increasing serum ionized Ca2+ concentration.23 The positive association between blood cCl and ciCa2+ in our study is consistent with previous findings obtained from dogs, cats, and neonatal calves, where ciCa2+ increased as serum or plasma cCl increased.4, 17, 21 Chloride ions are bound in a salt-type manner to positively charged guanidium and ε-amino groups in albumin despite the net negative charge of albumin at physiologic pH,24 with 3 chloride ions being electrostatically bound to bovine albumin at physiologic pH.22 The effect of chloride binding to albumin on ciCa2+ does not appear to be because of the effect of a decrease in plasma pH because of a decrease in SID because plasma cCl was positively correlated with plasma cNa (r = 0.70) and plasma cK (r = 0.55) in our study, indicating minimal change in plasma SID and therefore plasma pH because of large changes in plasma cCl. Similar to our study, the effect of chloride ions on ciCa2+ was observed to be independent of its effect on pH in critically ill neonatal calves.4 In accordance with our results, diet-induced increases in plasma cCl by feeding an acidogenic ration in dairy cows during early lactation was accompanied by an increase in ciCa2+ but no change ctCa.25 Moreover, in cows with parturient paresis, IV administration of CaCl2 resulted in higher serum iCa2+ concentrations than when the same amount calcium was administered as calcium borogluconate despite the fact that no difference was observed in ctCa.12 Taken together, these findings indicate that clinical evaluation of ctCa in sick adult cattle would benefit from simultaneous evaluation of blood chloride concentration, because of the direct effect of plasma cCl on iCa2+ binding to albumin.

    Current recommendations are that for clinical application, ciCa2+ and blood pH should be measured simultaneously and within 15 minutes in samples kept at room temperature or 4 hours in samples collected in iced water, and ciCa2+ reported as actual and adjusted to a pH of 7.40.26 Correction for pH compensates for preanalytical pH alterations associated with incorrect anaerobic handling of the sample and loss of CO2 through the wall of the polypropylene syringe during storage. A decrease in pH most likely increases ciCa2+ through pH-induced changes in net imidazole charge in specific histidine groups in albumin, resulting in a localized change in charge distribution that decreases iCa2+ binding. In multivariable regression analysis, comparison of actual pH vs pH-corrected values for iCa2+ indicated a pH-independent effect of chloride binding to albumin on ciCa2+ in that changes in chloride concentration had the same proportional effect on ciCa2+ whether ciCa2+ was actual or corrected to a pH of 7.40.

    Taken together, our results and that of a previous study in calves4 indicate that clinically relevant changes in plasma cCl exert a greater effect on ciCa2+ than clinically relevant changes in plasma pH.

    A negative association between venous blood pH and ciCa2+ was identified in critically ill neonatal calves.4 Moreover, venous blood pH had the second largest effect after plasma tCa concentrations on ciCa2+, and venous blood pH explained 19% of the variation of ciCa2+ in those calves.4 Univariable regression in our study also indicated a negative association between venous blood pH and ciCa2+ in adult cattle, but the association was weak in the multivariable regression model. Our results suggest that the effect of venous blood pH on ciCa2+ in sick adult cattle is lower than that previously appreciated.4 The median venous blood pH in ill neonatal calves was 7.31, ranging from 6.9 to 7.54 in that study4 whereas the median of venous blood pH in sick adult cattle was 7.48, ranging from 7.16 to 7.65 in our study. Moreover, in our study, venous blood pH results of 180 of 265 cattle were >7.46. Higher venous blood pH of sick adult cattle might be an explanation for this finding.

    Plasma cK was positively associated with ciCa2+ in sick adult cattle in our study, accounting for 9% of the variation in ciCa2+. The range for blood cK was 1.8-5.4 mmol/L (median, 3.6 mmol/L) in adult cattle. Plasma cK was not significantly associated with ciCa2+ in critically ill neonatal calves.4 In that study, the range for blood cK was 2.1-11.5 mmol/L (median, 4.6 mmol/L). Serum cK was positively associated with ciCa2+ in dogs and cats, but the association was weak relative to that of tCa, Cl, and albumin17, 21 Differences in blood cK may account for the different associations between plasma cK and ciCa2+ between ill neonatal and sick adult cattle. More likely, the positive association between potassium and calcium concentrations in sick adult cattle reflects the effect of inappetence and decreased calcium and potassium intake, with calcium and potassium losses being increased in lactating cattle. Concurrent decreases in serum chloride, potassium, and calcium concentrations are common clinicopathologic findings in dehydrated or endotoxemic adult cattle, particularly during the postpartum period. Our results imply that administration of fluids containing chloride and potassium during fluid therapy to adult sick cattle may result in increases in ciCa2+ in clinical practice.

    In our study, serum albumin concentration was significantly associated with ciCa2+, but serum albumin concentration accounted for only 1% of the variation in ciCa2+ of adult cattle with different clinical disorders. This finding indicates that clinical evaluation of ctCa in sick adult cattle does not require simultaneous evaluation of serum albumin concentration. In critically ill calves, univariate regression analyses showed that serum albumin concentration had a significant but weak effect relative to ctCa, venous blood pH, and cCl on ciCa2+. In that study, serum albumin concentration was not a significant predictor of ciCa2+ in a stepwise multivariable regression model.4 Serum albumin concentration had an influence on ciCa2+ in dogs17 and cats.21 Species differences in the number of calcium binding sites on albumin and net albumin charge could play a role in the observed differences.

    The iCa2+ percentage of ctCa has been investigated primarily in clinically healthy cattle and constituted 51% in 141 clinically healthy cows.7 In that study, calcium concentrations were measured within 2 hours after blood collection.7 The percentage of serum iCa2+ was determined as 43% in clinically healthy cows in different stages of lactation where most samples were analyzed within 24 hours, but some measurements were performed within 4 days.9 Mean plasma iCa2+ percentage was 57% at parturition and then decreased to 53% at peak lactation in clinically healthy Holstein and Jersey cows.27 Use of serum or plasma samples for the determination iCa2+ and time from sample collection to analysis might have influenced the blood iCa2+ percentage in the studies noted above. Blood iCa2+ % in ctCa changed from 49.6% to 47.2% depending on dietary cation-anion difference at prepartum period in clinically healthy cows. In that study, blood iCa2+ measurements were made within 30 minutes of sampling.25 In another study, blood iCa2+ % in ctCa was approximately 52% at prepartum day 3 and then increased to approximately 54% at parturition in cows fed with a dietary cation-anion difference of −7 where ciCa2+ was measured within 1 hour of sample collection.28 The range of blood iCa2+ percentage was 35 to 61% in 950 critically ill neonatal calves.4 Blood iCa2+ concentration and ctCa measurement methods in the previous 3 studies were similar to those of our study. In our study, the range of blood iCa2+ percentage in sick adult cattle (24%-69%) was wider than that of critically ill neonatal calves.4 Moreover, the median ciCa2+ of sick adult cattle was higher than that of sick neonatal calves (54% vs 47%). It has been suggested that approximately 50% of calcium in bovine blood exists in the ionized form. This assumption has been based on previous studies performed on clinically healthy cattle. In our study, blood iCa2+ percentages in ctCa of 100 of 265 cattle were >55%. The results of our study indicated that the assumption noted above might not be valid for sick cattle. Moreover, we observed lower median iCa2+ % in ctCa in cattle with gastrointestinal disorders than in cattle with other system diseases but its median value still was >50% in these cattle.

    A potential limitation of our study was the failure to measure plasma biochemical variables that have been associated in other studies with ciCa2+. Serum nonesterified fatty acids and beta-hydroxybutyric acid concentrations are negatively correlated with iCa2+ % in clinically healthy periparturient dairy cows.29 Serum magnesium and plasma L-lactate concentrations are associated with ciCa2+ in critically ill neonatal calves.4 Serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations are associated with ciCa2+ in dogs and cats.17, 21 It is well known that calcium metabolism disorders are an important problem during the postpartum period. In our study, 26 out of 240 cows were within 3 weeks postpartum. This limited number of early lactating cows is partly associated with the selection criteria which excluded cows that previously received calcium treatment to limit interference of treatment with study findings. Therefore, additional studies appear indicated, especially in periparturient dairy cows, to investigate the association of analytes such as nonesterified fatty acids, beta-hydroxybutyric acid, phosphorus, and magnesium on ciCa2+.

    In conclusion, ctCa measurements failed to accurately predict ciCa2+ status in ill adult cattle. The ciCa2+ had a positive relationship with ctCa, plasma cCl and cK, and with ctCa and plasma cCl, accounting for 63% of the variation on ciCa2+. Our results showed that venous blood pH and serum albumin concentration are not significant predictors of ciCa2+ in sick adult cattle. Accurate clinical evaluation of calcium status using ctCa measurements in adult cattle with clinical disorders would benefit from simultaneous evaluation of cCl and possibly cK because hypochloremia, hypokalemia, and hypocalcemia are common concurrent electrolyte disorders in sick adult cattle, particularly cattle with primary gastrointestinal tract diseases.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    No funding was received for this study.

      CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

      Sébastien Buczinski serves as Consulting Editor for Experimental Design and Statistics for the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. He was not involved in review of this manuscript. No other authors declare a conflict of interest.

      OFF-LABEL ANTIMICROBIAL DECLARATION

      Authors declare no off-label use of antimicrobials.

      INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) OR OTHER APPROVAL DECLARATION

      Approved by the Firat University Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation, Protocol Number: 2019/123, Decision Number: 179.

      HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION

      Authors declare human ethics approval was not needed for this study.

        The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.