Individualized chemotherapy drug dose escalation in dogs with multicentric lymphoma
Abstract
Background
This study was performed to determine the ability to escalate drug doses in a 15-week CHOP protocol in dogs with multicentric lymphoma.
Hypothesis
We hypothesized that at least 50% of dogs could successfully be escalated in at least 1 drug. Secondary aims were to establish objective response rate (ORR), progression-free interval (PFI), and overall survival time (OST).
Animals
Thirty dogs with newly diagnosed multicentric lymphoma were prospectively treated with a 15-week CHOP protocol.
Methods
This was a prospective cohort study. Drug doses that did not cause dose-limiting adverse effects (AEs) were increased using a standardized escalation protocol. AEs and response were assessed using VCOG criteria. Serial blood samples were collected after the first dose of each drug for pharmacokinetic analysis.
Results
Of the 23 dogs with the opportunity to dose escalate, at least 1 drug was successfully escalated in 18 (78%). Vincristine was successfully escalated to 0.8 mg/m2 or higher in 11 dogs, cyclophosphamide to 300 mg/m2 or higher in 16 dogs, and doxorubicin to 35 mg/m2 or 1.4 mg/kg or higher in 9 dogs. Three of the 23 dogs (13%) were hospitalized at least once because of drug-induced AEs. Neutropenia was the most common dose-limiting toxicosis for all drugs. Peak doxorubicin concentrations were significantly lower in dogs where doxorubicin was successfully escalated. The objective response rate was 100%. The median progression free interval was 171 days. The median overall survival time was 254 days.
Conclusions
Drugs in the CHOP protocol can often be escalated safely with manageable AEs.
Abbreviations
-
- AEs
-
- adverse effects
-
- AUC
-
- area under the curve
-
- CR
-
- complete response
-
- CSU-VTH
-
- Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital
-
- CTX
-
- cyclophosphamide
-
- CV
-
- coefficient of variation
-
- DOX
-
- doxorubicin
-
- ORR
-
- objective response rate
-
- OST
-
- overall survival time
-
- PD
-
- progressive disease
-
- PFI
-
- progression-free interval
-
- PR
-
- partial response
-
- SHC
-
- sterile hemorrhagic cystitis
-
- TTP
-
- time to progression
-
- VCR
-
- vincristine
1 INTRODUCTION
Doxorubicin (DOX) containing combination chemotherapy protocols are considered the standard of care for the treatment of dogs with multicentric lymphoma. The most common of these is CHOP, which includes the drugs cyclophosphamide (CTX), DOX, vincristine (VCR), and prednisone. There are multiple versions of the CHOP protocol that vary the order of drugs given and the duration of treatment.1, 2 Despite numerous iterations of this protocol, outcomes tend to be similar, with overall response rates (ORRs) of >90%, median progression free intervals (PFIs) of approximately 7-9 months, and median overall survival times (OSTs) of about 1 year from the time of diagnosis.1 There has been minimal progress in the treatment of dogs with multicentric lymphoma in the past 20 years.
Chemotherapy-induced toxicosis is associated with an improved prognosis.3 In addition, more dose-intense chemotherapy protocols for dogs with multicentric lymphoma and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia are associated with significantly increased remission and survival times compared to dogs without neutropenia.4 A dose-intensified/dose-dense protocol using the standard CHOP drugs plus L-asparaginase and methotrexate showed that the incidence of toxicosis associated with this protocol was high; however, dogs that required dose reductions and treatment delays had significantly longer times to progression and lymphoma-specific survival times.5 A dose-intense version of the original UW-Madison protocol with no maintenance phase, in which dogs receive increased doses of CTX (250 vs 200 mg/m2) and DOX (37.5 vs 30 mg/m2), found no difference in PFI or OST when comparing this group to a group of historical controls treated with the standard protocol, but the odds of death because of toxicosis was significantly higher in the high-dose group (odds ratio = 8.8).6 Of note, in this study, 8 dogs died after receiving conventional doses of chemotherapy (either L-asparaginase and VCR or VCR alone), while 5 died after intensified doses of CTX and DOX. These studies both used uniform dosing among dogs, and treatments were not customized to the individual dog. Given the evidence of the positive effect of chemotherapy-induced toxicosis on outcomes of dogs being treated for multicentric lymphoma, the feasibility of dog-specific dose escalation of individualized drugs in the CHOP protocol warrants investigation.
The goal of this prospective study was to assess the ability to successfully escalate drug doses in dogs with multicentric lymphoma treated with 15-week CHOP chemotherapy using an individualized and standardized intradog dose escalation protocol. Secondary outcomes included ORR, PFI, and OST. In addition, pharmacokinetic data were obtained to assess drug exposure in conjunction with a dog's ability to tolerate dose escalation of a drug. Toxicosis associated with the protocol was also assessed. Our hypothesis was that at least 50% of dogs would be able to be successfully escalated in at least 1 drug in the CHOP protocol.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Dog selection
Colorado State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Clinical Review Board approval was acquired and signed informed consent was obtained from owners before enrollment. Dogs with newly diagnosed, high-grade, multicentric lymphoma confirmed via cytology or histopathology were prospectively enrolled into a cohort study from January 2018 to September 2020 at the Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (CSU-VTH). All dogs were required to weigh greater than or equal to 9 kg, which was the minimal weight necessary for the volume of blood collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. All immunophenotypes were considered eligible. In addition, the owners had to plan to pursue chemotherapy with the CHOP protocol at CSU. Exclusion criteria included dogs that received any prior chemotherapy for multicentric lymphoma, including corticosteroids for greater than 7 days before starting the CHOP protocol. Dogs were also excluded if they had cardiac insufficiency that precluded them from receiving DOX, if they had a concurrent malignancy or other serious systemic disorder, or if they received homeopathic or alternative therapies within 1 day of the start of the study. Dogs receiving supplements, including chondroitin sulfate, vitamins, essential fatty acids, and glucosamine were considered eligible. All dogs had a complete blood count (CBC), chemistry panel, and urinalysis within 7 days of enrollment in the trial to screen for systemic disorders. Thoracic radiographs and abdominal ultrasound were encouraged if clinically indicated but not required. Dogs were assigned an approximate stage based on the World Health Organization clinical staging system.7
2.2 Treatment protocol
All chemotherapy agents were purchased from commercial vendors. CHOP chemotherapy was administered according to the 15-week protocol used at CSU (Table S1).8 The first cycle of CHOP was administered at standard doses (VCR 0.7 mg/m2, CTX 250 mg/m2, DOX 30 mg/m2). VCR and DOX were given IV, and CTX was given PO. Prednisone or prednisolone was prescribed per the protocol pending pharmacy availability. Oral furosemide was administered concurrently with CTX at 1-2 mg/kg. For dogs weighing less than 15 kg, DOX was dosed at 1 mg/kg. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected before treatment and at varying timepoints after treatment based on known pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug. VCR samples were obtained 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours after dosing. CTX samples were collected 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours after dosing. DOX samples were collected 5 minutes, 45 minutes, and 1 hour after dosing. (Table 1).
Time point | Sample type |
---|---|
Week 1 | Serum/whole blood |
Week 1—VCR PK Before dose, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours after dosing |
Serum/whole blood |
Week 2—CTX PK Before dose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours after dosing |
Plasma |
Week 3—DOX PK Before dose, 5 minutes, 45 minutes, and 1 hour after dosing |
Serum |
Weeks 5, 9, and 13 | Serum/whole blood |
Monthly after chemotherapy and relapse visit | Serum/whole blood |
- Abbreviations: CTX, cyclophosphamide; DOX, doxorubicin; VCR, vincristine.
Doses of drugs that did not cause dose-limiting adverse effects (AEs) were increased for subsequent treatments according to a standardized escalation protocol, and dose reductions were performed in accordance with a specified protocol (Tables 2 and 3). Once a dog required a dose reduction for a drug, no further dose escalation was implemented for subsequent doses of that drug. Supportive medications for treatment of AEs were given at the discretion of the prescribing clinician and were not limited by the study. Lymph node biopsies were collected before starting chemotherapy and at the time of relapse for biobanking. Blood samples (whole blood and serum) were also collected at the time of each VCR treatment and monthly after completion of the CHOP protocol for biobanking. Complete blood counts were performed before each chemotherapy treatment, as well as at the expected drug nadir after any dose adjustment. In addition, an owner quality of life survey and measurement of target and nontarget lesions were performed at every visit to assess response to therapy.
Neutrophil count at nadir (cells/uL) | Other DLT/Febrile/Sick | Action |
---|---|---|
≥1500 | No | Increase next dosea |
≥1500 | Yes | Decrease next dose by 10% |
1000-1499 | No | Decrease next dose by 10% |
<1000 | No | Decrease next dose by 20% |
<1499 | Yes | Decrease next dose by 20% |
- a Vincristine—increase by 0.1 mg/m2 per dose; cyclophosphamide—increase by approximately 50 mg/m2 per dose (based on nearest tablet size).
Neutrophil count at nadir (cells/uL) | Other DLT/Febrile/Sick | Action |
---|---|---|
≥1100 | No | Increase next dosea |
≥800 | Yes | Decrease next dose by 10% |
800-1099 | No | Keep subsequent doses same |
<800 | No | Decrease next dose by 10% |
<800 | Yes | Decrease next dose by 20% |
- a Increase by 5 mg/m2 if ≥15 kg; increase by 0.2 mg/kg if <15 kg.
2.3 Response and toxicosis evaluation
Response to chemotherapy was assessed using the VCOG response evaluation criteria for peripheral nodal lymphoma in dogs.9 Dogs were considered off-study if there was evidence of disease progression, if AEs occurred that warranted discontinuation of chemotherapy, or in the instance of death by any cause. If a dog died while enrolled in the study, a necropsy exam was requested but not required.
All AEs were recorded and graded according to the VCOG CTCAE v1.1.10 This version of VCOG was utilized because of available published material at the start of enrollment. AEs were determined via owner reported history, clinical abnormalities at time of evaluations, and clinicopathologic assessment.
2.4 Pharmacokinetic analysis
DOX, CTX, and 4-OH-cyclophosphamide were analyzed by LC/MS/MS as previously described.11, 12 A detailed description of the methods for pharmacokinetic analysis can be found in the supplemental material.
2.5 Pharmacokinetic calculations and analysis
2.6 Statistical analysis
Assuming a 50% hypothetical escalation percentage, 30 dogs were enrolled to allow for calculation of the observed escalation percentage with 37.5% variability, equating to 95% confidence intervals of 31.3%-68.7%. The number of dogs that were able to be successfully dose escalated for at least 1 drug were expressed as a percent of total dogs enrolled. Continuous data were reported as median and ranges, and categorical data were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Progression-free interval (PFI) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from date of treatment initiation to the date of PD or death, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was calculated as a percentage of dogs that had a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Drug Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) were compared in dogs escalated or not escalated for each drug via a 2-tailed, unpaired T test or Mann-Whitney test depending on data normality. Body weight and ability to escalate each drug was evaluated using a 2-tailed, unpaired T test or Mann-Whitney test depending on data normality. Change in neutrophil count post treatment was correlated with AUC and Cmax via simple linear regression. Dogs were censored if they were withdrawn or lost to follow-up before PD occurred. The Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate and display the distribution of PFS and OS, and cohorts were compared using logrank analysis. Variables with values of P ≤ .05 were considered significant. All statistical analysis was performed with a commercial software package (Prism v9, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California).
3 RESULTS
3.1 Study sample
Thirty dogs were prospectively enrolled in this study. Numerous breeds were represented, including Mixed Breed (14), Labrador retriever (4), Boxer (3), Tibetan terrier (1), American Pit Bull Terrier (1), Bernese Mountain Dog (1), Boykin spaniel (1), Goldendoodle (1), Greyhound (1), Labradoodle (1), Rottweiler (1), and Yorkshire terrier (1). Information regarding age, weight, sex, approximate stage, substage, and immunophenotype is shown in Table 4.
Age (years) | Median (range) | 7 (2.1-13.3) |
Weight (kg) | Median (range) | 25.85 (6.2-49.4) |
Sex (%) | Male neutered | 18 (60) |
Female spayed | 12 (40) | |
Approximate WHO stage (%) | II | 1 (3) |
III | 20 (67) | |
IV | 1 (3) | |
V | 8 (27) | |
Substage (%) | a | 19 (63) |
b | 11 (37) | |
Method of diagnosis (%) | Cytology | 28 (93) |
Biopsy | 2 (7) | |
Immunophenotype (%) | B | 17 (57) |
T | 13 (43) |
- Note: Data are reported as n (%).
3.2 Dose escalation
In total, 23 dogs were eligible to dose escalate. Five of the 7 dogs not escalated were withdrawn before escalation because of disease progression within the first cycle at standard chemotherapy doses. One dog was euthanized 1 week after the first dose of VCR after development of a fever and swollen joint suspected to be secondary to lymphoma-induced systemic vasculitis. This was not considered to be secondary to the dose of VCR. One dog was not escalated because of persistent thrombocytopenia and panleukopenia. Of those with the opportunity to escalate, 78% (18/23) were successfully escalated in at least 1 drug during the CHOP protocol. A total of 63 dose escalation events occurred: 21 for VCR, 27 for CTX, and 15 for DOX. Vincristine was successfully escalated to 0.8 mg/m2 in 3 dogs, 0.9 mg/m2 in 6 dogs, and 1.0 mg/m2 in 2 dogs. Cyclophosphamide was successfully escalated to 300 mg/m2 in 8 dogs, 350 mg/m2 in 5 dogs, and 400 mg/m2 in 3 dogs. Doxorubicin was successfully escalated to 35 mg/m2 in 5 dogs, 40 mg/m2 in 1 dog, 45 mg/m2 in 1 dog, 1.4 mg/kg in 1 dog, and 1.6 mg/kg in 1 dog. No further dose escalation done in any dog beyond 1.0 mg/m2 (VCR), 400 mg/m2 (CTX), and 45 mg/m2/1.6 mg/kg (DOX) as the dogs had reached the end of their treatment protocols.
3.3 Adverse events
All 30 dogs were available for AE assessment. Neutropenia was the most common dose-limiting toxicosis for all drugs. The most frequently observed AEs and severe AEs are available in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively; a complete list of AEs is in Table S2. The highest reported AEs were grade 4 in 10 dogs and were associated with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. One of these occurred after standard dosing of VCR. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred after VCR in 2 dogs (0.7 mg/m2 [1]) and 0.9 mg/m2 [1] dose), for CTX in 4 dogs (300 mg/m2 [3] and 400 mg/m2 [1] dose), and for DOX in 3 dogs (31.5 mg/m2 [1], 35 mg/m2 [1], and 40 mg/m2 [1] dose). One dog had a documented fever associated with the grade 4 neutropenia. One dog also experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia after 35 mg/m2 of DOX. Two dogs experienced grade 3 diarrhea after 30 mg/m2 and 35 mg/m2 of DOX, resulting in subsequent dose reductions. One episode of grade 3 vomiting, 2 episodes of grade 3 anorexia, 1 episode of grade 3 ileus, and 1 episode of grade 3 hematochezia were also documented. All other GI toxicosis was grade 1 or 2. In addition, 1 dog had grade 3 sterile hemorrhagic cystitis after 400 mg/m2 of CTX, despite cotreatment with furosemide. One dog developed a fever and swollen joint after his first dose of VCR. No dogs died as a result of drug toxicosis, and no dogs were withdrawn from the study secondary to AEs.
Event | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gastrointestinal | |||||
Vomiting | 14 | 4 | 1 | ||
Diarrhea | 15 | 6 | 2 | ||
Anorexia | 12 | 9 | 2 | ||
Nausea | 8 | 3 | |||
Constitutional | |||||
Lethargy | 12 | 11 | 1 | ||
Hematologic | |||||
Anemia | 13 | 3 | |||
Neutropenia | 3 | 3 | 10 | 9 | |
Thrombocytopenia | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | |
Cutaneous | |||||
Dermatopathy | 7 | 3 |
- Note: Commonly characterized by ≥10 incidences.
Event | Grade 3 | Grade 4 |
---|---|---|
Gastrointestinal | ||
Vomiting | 1 | |
Diarrhea | 2 | |
Anorexia | 2 | |
Ileus | 1 | |
Hematochezia | 1 | |
Constitutional | ||
Lethargy | 1 | |
Fever | 1 | |
Hematologic | ||
Neutropenia | 10 | 9 |
Thrombocytopenia | 3 | 2 |
Hepatic | ||
Increased alkaline phosphatase | 2 | |
Urinary | ||
Hematuria | 1 | |
Sterile hemorrhagic cystitis | 1 | |
Pigmenturia | 1 | |
Other biochemical | ||
Hypercalcemia | 4 | |
Hyperfibrinogenemia | 1 | |
Other | ||
Pain | 1 | |
Hypotension | 1 |
Of the dogs that had the opportunity to dose escalate, 4 dogs (17%) were hospitalized. Of these, 1 dog was hospitalized because of a grade 4 neutropenia after DOX at 31.5 mg/m2, 1 because of a grade 3 neutropenia after DOX at 35 mg/m2, and 1 because of a grade 3 neutropenia after VCR at 1.0 mg/m2. When the VCR dog was hospitalized, his neutropenia was resolving; however, he developed nausea and hyporexia and was hospitalized for supportive care. The remaining dog was hospitalized for acute vomiting, lethargy, hyporexia, and defecating foreign material. This was suspected to be secondary to foreign body ingestion rather than a consequence of chemotherapy, as it occurred 13 days after DOX administration. Three additional dogs were hospitalized after standard dosages of chemotherapy. Of these, 1 was hospitalized and eventually euthanized after the first dose of vincristine after development of a fever and swollen joint suspected to be secondary to lymphoma-induced systemic vasculitis, as previously mentioned. Findings on necropsy examination included profound fibrinoid and leukocytoclastic vasculitis affecting numerous small and medium caliber vessels in the subcutis of the right forelimb. While the exact etiology of this cutaneous vasculitis was unclear, it was considered possible that vascular infiltration and destruction by neoplastic cells incited a systemic vasculitis in this dog based on the evidence of similar fibrinoid vascular necrosis in sections of the mandibular lymph node associated with cuffing of those vessels by neoplastic lymphocytes.
3.4 Dose reductions/delays
Thirty-nine dose reductions occurred across all dogs. Vincristine was dose-reduced 14 times, CTX was dose-reduced 12 times, and DOX was dose-reduced 13 times. Vincristine was dose-reduced in 12 dogs (40%), CTX in 11 dogs (36%), and DOX in 13 dogs (43%). The average dose reduction was 15% for VCR, 15% for CTX, and 10% for DOX. The most frequent reason for dose reduction across all agents was neutropenia, occurring 31 times (80% of dose-reductions). The other catalyst for reduction was GI toxicosis in 8 instances (20% of dose-reductions). Dose delays occurred in 16 dogs (53%). The average duration of dose-delay was 7.3 days (range, 4-14 days). Dose delay was most commonly attributed to neutropenia.
3.5 Pharmacokinetics
DOX, CTX, and VCR plasma concentrations were assessed at designated timepoints after administration. DOX C5min was significantly lower in dogs that could be successfully escalated (P = .03). The VCR C5min was significantly correlated with the magnitude of neutrophil change (P = .01). Drug Cmax was not significantly correlated with the ability to escalate for CTX or VCR nor with magnitude of neutrophil change for CTX or DOX. AUC was not significantly correlated with magnitude of neutrophil change. Body weight was not correlated with the ability to escalate each drug.
3.6 Outcomes
The ORR was 100%, with 19 (63%) dogs achieving a CR, and 11 (37%) dogs experiencing a PR. The median PFI was 171 days (range, 21-332 days; 203.5 for B cell, 83 for T cell). The median OST was 254 days (range, 6-629 days; 260 for B cell, 222 for T cell). One dog was censored from survival analysis at 213 days, as the dog was lost to follow-up after a single rescue dose of CCNU/L-asparaginase. Three other dogs were censored, as they were alive at the time of manuscript submission, with follow-up times of 866, 1025, and 1155 days. Twenty-five dogs were withdrawn from study because of disease progression. Two were withdrawn because of death or euthanasia. The dog that died was suspected to have a fatal arrhythmia, which was suspected to be secondary to chronic active interstitial pneumonia that spread to the left atrium based on necropsy examination. The other dog was withdrawn after euthanasia was elected because of systemic vasculitis after his first dose of VCR. One dog was withdrawn because of excessive myelosuppression. Two dogs are still in remission after completing their initial CHOP protocol.
4 DISCUSSION
The goal of this study was to assess the ability to successfully escalate drug doses in dogs with multicentric lymphoma treated with 15-week CHOP chemotherapy using a standardized dose escalation protocol. Dogs undergoing CHOP chemotherapy traditionally tolerate this treatment well, with acceptable AEs, allowing them to maintain an excellent quality of life during treatment. While this largely aligns with one of the tenets of veterinary oncology, it is plausible that many dogs can tolerate increased dosages of chemotherapy that could improve their outcome while maintaining a good quality of life during treatment. In this prospective study, 78% of dogs that had the opportunity to dose-escalate were successfully escalated in at least 1 of the drugs in the CHOP protocol, suggesting that many dogs receiving CHOP chemotherapy at accepted standardized doses are potentially underdosed in 1 or more drugs.
AEs are traditionally considered undesirable in veterinary oncology as they do not align with the goals of treatment. However, dogs that develop AEs resulting in treatment delays or dose reductions have longer time to progression (TTP) and multicentric lymphoma-specific survival times.4, 5, 8 This suggests that dogs experiencing a delay in chemotherapy after dose-escalation could similarly enjoy a survival benefit, which might be viewed as beneficial, so long as the dog does not experience severe AEs that would be considered unacceptable as a result of treatment.
Assessment of AE development was crucial in this study when determining if a dog could be successfully escalated in 1 or more drugs. Numerous previous iterations of the CHOP protocol have been investigated in veterinary oncology with varying dose intensity and resultant chemotherapy-associated toxicosis. Traditionally, the most common AEs associated with CHOP chemotherapy include myelosuppression and GI toxicosis. This was true in our study as well, with neutropenia being the most common dose-limiting toxicosis for all drugs. The majority of GI toxicosis was low grade in nature and readily controlled with GI supportive medications, similar to dogs treated with a standard CHOP protocol. One dog experienced sterile hemorrhagic cystitis (SHC) after 400 mg/m2 of CTX, despite cotreatment with furosemide. In human patients, the incidence of SHC increases with increased dose, frequency of administration, and chronicity of oral CTX administration.14 Similarly, in veterinary medicine, cumulative dose is described as a risk factor for SHC.15 While this could suggest that escalated doses of CTX could increase the risk of SHC, the overall incidence of SHC in this study is similar to frequencies of SHC development during standard dosing (200-250 mg/m2) in dogs treated with furosemide.16 Small dogs (<10 kg) are more susceptible to myelosuppression after DOX at standard body surface area dosing (30 mg/m2).17 In our study, dogs <15 kg were prescribed DOX on a weight-based dosing (mg/kg) in an attempt to reduce AE development; however, 2/3 of dogs less than 15 kg were able to be escalated successfully. This suggests that even small dogs are capable of tolerating escalated doses of DOX with a controlled escalation protocol. In our study, a relationship did not exist between body size and ability to escalate the other drugs in the protocol.
13% of dogs were hospitalized secondary to dose-escalated chemotherapy. This is similar to dogs to which chemotherapy was administered at what is now considered standard dosing.18 Additionally, no chemotherapy-related grade 5 AEs were documented in our study, highlighting that dose-escalation can be performed safely. Despite variable escalation of all drugs in this study, AEs in this study sample were similar to those for dogs being treated with CHOP chemotherapy, and most were mild and self-limiting. This suggests that most dogs that are dose-escalated in a systematic manner can receive some chemotherapy agents in the CHOP protocol at higher doses without increased incidence of AEs (Tables 5, 6, and S2).
As most chemotherapy drugs have a relatively narrow therapeutic index, it is important to understand the pharmacokinetics of these drugs to direct appropriate dosing for veterinary patients. Once administered, the AUC, defined as the plot of plasma concentration of a drug vs time after dosage, gives insight into the extent of exposure to a drug.18 In human patients there is a lack of correlation between dose administered and AUC; however, there is a significant correlation between AUC and bone marrow suppression.19, 20 Furthermore, there is no significant correlation between DOX administered to a group of veterinary patients at standard dosing (30 mg/m2) and the predicted AUC. Additionally, there is no correlation between total dose (mg) nor dose per body weight (mg/kg) and nadir absolute neutrophil count. Importantly, a significant correlation was identified between AUC and nadir neutrophil count, and it was posited that a model could be utilized that incorporates baseline neutrophil count and AUC to predict the nadir neutrophil count.11 As neutropenia at a nadir during chemotherapy administration is a common reason for dose delay, dose reduction, or a combination of these actions, this suggests that individual drug exposure could have important implications for chemotherapy dosing of a particular dog receiving chemotherapy. Similar findings were identified in our study sample; specifically, the DOX C5min was significantly lower in dogs that could be successfully escalated. This suggests that understanding the C5min of an individual dog could be utilized to predict their ability to tolerate a subsequently escalated dose of DOX. Similarly, the VCR C5min was significantly correlated with the magnitude of neutrophil change. This implies that modeling using change in absolute neutrophil count after VCR could be predictive of an optimal VCR dosage for a dog. Therefore, individualized pharmacokinetic data could be employed to predict the ability to escalate (DOX) and an optimal escalated dose (VCR), thereby enhancing the ability to deliver higher dosages of chemotherapy safely to certain dogs.
The secondary aims of this study included assessing dogs for ORR, PFI, and OST. The ORR in our study was 100%, similar to previous literature, reaffirming that most dogs experience an initial benefit from treatment with CHOP chemotherapy.1, 6, 8, 21 The median PFI was 171 days (203.5 for B cell, 83 for T cell). The median OST was 254 days (260 for B cell, 222 for T cell). Despite 18 dogs being successfully escalated in 1 or more drugs, outcomes were similar to previously reported median survival times for dogs with multicentric lymphoma treated with CHOP chemotherapy.3, 8 This could be attributed to type II error; however, it is also possible that employing a standardized dose escalation scheme truly does not improve outcome. Larger prospective studies evaluating dose escalation for a more uniform study sample of dogs with multicentric lymphoma (ie, single immunophenotype) to assess outcomes are warranted. It is also possible that a modified dose escalation scheme with different criteria for escalation could result in superior outcomes.
This study had several limitations. Despite being prospective, this study sample represented a heterogenous collection of lymphoma cases. Varying stages and immunophenotypes of disease likely affected outcome data. Furthermore, Colorado State University is a tertiary referral center. This suggests that dogs recruited into the study might not represent a standard collection of multicentric lymphoma cases representative of the general population. In addition, this study was reliant on client reporting of AEs for nonhematological toxicosis. Clients often perceive or witness clinical signs differently. This could result in variability in AE reporting and alter our understanding of a dog's AEs experienced secondary to an escalated dose of chemotherapy. Similarly, decisions with regard to dose escalation/reduction based on nonhematologic AEs were not truly standardized, as they were based on the owners' subjective interpretation and tolerance of AEs. Finally, dogs received variable treatment after PD, which could have affected OST.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Drugs in the CHOP protocol can often be escalated safely in many dogs, with manageable AEs. However, the potential for a positive effect on outcome with dose escalation remains unknown.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was financially supported by the Eldred Foundation. Preliminary findings from this study were presented at the annual Veterinary Cancer Society meeting in Fall, 2021. The authors acknowledge Susan E Lana, DVM, MS, DACVIM (Oncology) for her contributions to the study. Special thanks to the Colorado State University Oncology Clinical Trials service and finally, the Robert and Eva Knight Residency in Oncology Endowment for supporting Dr Siewert's medical oncology training program.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
OFF-LABEL ANTIMICROBIAL DECLARATION
Authors declare no off-label use of antimicrobials.
INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) OR OTHER APPROVAL DECLARATION
Authors declare that protocol approval was obtained from the Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital Clinical Review Board.
HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION
Authors declare human ethics approval was not needed for this study.