Full Access
Trade and the Effect of Public Investment on Regional Inequalities in Heterogeneously Integrated Areas
Joan Costa-Font,
Eduardo Rodriguez-Oreggia,
Joan Costa-Font
London School of Economics, UK, and Universitat de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorEduardo Rodriguez-Oreggia
IIDSES, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico DF
Search for more papers by this authorJoan Costa-Font,
Eduardo Rodriguez-Oreggia,
Joan Costa-Font
London School of Economics, UK, and Universitat de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorEduardo Rodriguez-Oreggia
IIDSES, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico DF
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Regional integration, it is argued, challenges the distribution of economic activity among regions. However, the government role in shifting the patterns of regional inequalities is still under debate and has received small comprehensive empirical evidence. This paper examines the hypothesis of trade as channelling public investment and, thus, perpetuating regional inequalities. We argue that the interplay of public and private investment plays a key role in stimulating trade and economic activity. To avoid problems of cross-country heterogeneity and comparability this study examines data for two countries; Mexico and Spain, both followers of trade integration arrangements. Findings indicate that regional inequalities in Mexico are significantly explained by differences in export capacity serving to boost private investment whereas inequalities in Spain are appreciably driven by previous endowments and private capital formation.
Footnotes
REFERENCES
- Anderson, J. E. and E. Van Wincoop (2001), ‘Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, WP No. 8079.
- Arellano, M. and S. R. Bond (1991), ‘Some Tests for Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Simulation Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations’, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 2, 277–97.
- Arrow, K. J. and M. Kurz (1970), Public Investment, the Rate of Return and Optimal Fiscal Policy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
- Barro, R. (1990), ‘Government Spending in a Simple Model for Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 5, 103–25.
-
Barro, R. and
X. Sala-i-Martin (1991), ‘Convergence Across States and Regions’, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1991, 1, 107–82.
10.2307/2534639 Google Scholar
- Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1992), ‘Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth’, Review of Economic Studies, 59, 4, 645–61.
- Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1995), Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
- Ben-David, D. and A. Kimhi (2000), ‘Trade and the Rate of Income Convergence’, NBER Working Paper No. 7642 (Cambridge, MA: NBER).
-
Ben-David, D. and
M. B. Loewy (1998), ‘Free Trade, Growth and Convergence’, Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 2, 143–70.
10.1023/A:1009705702579 Google Scholar
-
Boldrin, M. and
F. Canova (2001), ‘Inequality and Convergence: Reconsidering European Regional Policies’, Economic Policy, 16, 32, 207–53.
10.1111/1468-0327.00074 Google Scholar
- Borts, G. H. (1960), ‘The Equalisation of Returns and Regional Economic Growth’, American Economic Review, 50, 3, 319–47.
- Bosworth, B., S. M. Collins and N. C. Lustig (1997), ‘Introduction’, in B. Bosworth, S. M. Collins and N. C. Lustig (eds.), Coming Together? Mexico-United States Relations (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).
- Brown, W. N. and W. P. Anderson (2002), ‘Spatial Markets and the Potential for Economic Integration between Canadian and the US Regions’, Papers in Regional Science, 81, 1, 99–120.
- Burfisher, M. E., S. Robinson and K. Thierfelder (2001), ‘The Impact of NAFTA on the United States’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 1, 125–44.
- Costa, J. and R. Tremosa (2003), ‘Spanish Regions and the Macroeconomics Benefits of the EMU’, Regional Studies, 37, 3, 219–28.
- Crucini, M., C. Telmer and M. Zachariadis (2000), ‘Dispersion in Real Exchange Rates’, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers.
-
De la Fuente, A. and
X. Vives (1995), ‘Infrastructure and Education as Instruments of Regional Policy: Evidence from Spain’, Economic Policy, 10, 20, 11–40.
10.2307/1344537 Google Scholar
- Faini, R. (1984), ‘Increasing Returns, Non-traded Inputs and Regional Development’, Economic Journal, 94, 374, 308–23.
-
Francois, J. F. and
C. R. Shiells (1994), Modelling Trade Policy: Applied General Equilibrium Assessments of North American Free Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
10.1017/CBO9780511664472 Google Scholar
- Frankel, J. A. and D. Romer (1999), ‘Does Trade Cause Growth?’, American Economic Review, 89, 3, 379–99.
-
Fujita, M.,
P. Krugman and
A. J. Venables (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Garcia-Mila, T. and T. McGuire (2001), ‘Do Interregional Transfers Improve the Economic Performance of Poor Regions? The Case of Spain’, International Tax and Public Finance, 8, 5, 281–95.
- Gasioek, N., A. Smith and A. Venables (1992), ‘Trade and Welfare: A General Equilibrium Model’, in L. A. Winters (ed.), Trade Flows and Trade Policy After 1992 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 35–61.
- Hanson, G. H. (1996), ‘Localization Economies, Vertical Organization and Trade’, American Economic Review, 86, 5, 1266–78.
- Hanson, G. H. (1997), ‘Increasing Returns, Trade and the Regional Structure of Wages’, Economic Journal, 107, 445, 113–33.
- Hanson, G. H. (1998), ‘Regional Adjustment to Trade Liberalization’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28, 4, 419–44.
- Hausman, J. (1978), ‘Specification Tests in Econometrics’, Econometrica, 52, 1, 1219–40.
- Hirschman, A. (1958), The Strategy of Economic Development (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
- Irwin, D. A. and M. Terviö (2000), ‘Does Trade Raise Income? Evidence from the Twentieth Century’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7745.
- Juan-Ramón, V. H. and L. A. Rivera-Batiz (1996), ‘Regional Growth in Mexico: 1973–93’, International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 96/92.
- Keller, W. (1997), ‘Trade and Transmission of Technology’, NBER Working Paper No. W6113.
- Krueger, A. O. (2000), ‘NAFTA's Effects: A Preliminary Assessment’, World Economy, 23, 6, 761–75.
- Krugman, P. (1991), ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 3, 483–99.
- Limao, N. and A. J. Venables (1999), ‘Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, and Transport Cost’, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2257.
- Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1993), ‘Making a Miracle’, Econometrica, 61, 2, 251–72.
- Martin, P. (1998), ‘Can Regional Policies Affect Growth and Geography in Europe?’, World Economy, 21, 6, 757–74.
- Martin, P. (1999), ‘Public Policies, Regional Inequalities and Growth’, Journal of Public Economics, 73, 1, 85–105.
- Martin, P. and C. A. Rogers (1995), ‘Industrial Location and Public Infrastructure’, Journal of International Economics, 39, 3–4, 335–51.
- McCallum, J. (1995), ‘National Borders Matter: Canada–US Regional Trade Patterns’, American Economic Review, 85, 2, 615–23.
- Mulligan, C. B. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1993), ‘Transitional Dynamics in Two Sector Model of Endogenous Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 3, 737–73.
- Mundell, R. (1964), ‘Tariff Preferences and the Terms of Trade’, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 32, 1, 1–13.
- Peach, J. T. and R. V. Adkinson (2000), ‘NAFTA and Economic Activity along US-Mexico Border’, Journal of Economic Issues, 34, 2, 481–89.
- Puga, D. (1999), ‘The Rise and Fall of Regional Inequalities’, European Economic Review, 43, 2, 303–34.
- Siebert, H. (1969), Regional Economic Growth: Theory and Policy (Scranton: Intranat, Textbook Co.).
- United States International Trade Commission (2003), Interactive Tariff and Trade Data ( http://dataweb.usitc.gov ) (May, 2003).
- Venables, A. J. (1999), ‘Regional Integration Agreement, a Force for Convergence or Divergence?’, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2260.
- Venables, A. (2001), ‘Geography and International Inequalities: The Impact of New Technologies’, CEP DP 507.
- White, H. (1980), ‘A Heteroscedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity’, Econometrica, 48, 3, 817–30.
