Volume 29, Issue 2 pp. 124-127

Interobserver perceptual analysis of smokers voice

R.A. Dedivitis

R.A. Dedivitis

Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos

Search for more papers by this author
A.P.B. Barros

A.P.B. Barros

Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo of Fundação Antônio Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
D.S. Queija

D.S. Queija

Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos

Search for more papers by this author
J.C.M. Alexandre

J.C.M. Alexandre

Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos

Search for more papers by this author
W.T.M. Rezende

W.T.M. Rezende

Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos

Search for more papers by this author
V.R. Corazza

V.R. Corazza

Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos

Search for more papers by this author
V.F.C. Silva

V.F.C. Silva

Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos

Search for more papers by this author
I.N. Nishimoto

I.N. Nishimoto

Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo of Fundação Antônio Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 April 2004
Citations: 8
Rogério A. Dedivitis, Rua Olinto Rodrigues Dantas, 343 conj. 92 – 11050-220 Santos, SP, Brazil (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate variations in the voice by three experienced speech–language therapists. Forty-eight men and nine women from the Associação dos Alcoólicos Anônimos, Santos were studied. Their ages were from 28 to 81 years, with median of 49 years and everyone was a smoker for 60 to 720 months. Most of them used more than 20 cigarettes a day and all of them had stopped alcohol use for 1 to 25 months. The perceptual analysis of the voices was performed by means of the GRBAS scale. The voice sample consisted of a sustained vowel /a/ at a comfortable pitch and loudness level. The three judges were blinded to the opinion of their colleagues and a kappa test was applied. For roughness, the concordance rates were 59.6% for observers 1 and 2 (κ = 0.234); 47.4% for 1 and 3 (κ = 0.047) and 52.6% (κ = 0.016) for 2 and 3. For breathiness, the concordance rates were 80.7% for observers 1 and 2 (κ =  0.191); 57.9% for 1 and 3 (κ = 0.147) and 57.9% (κ = 0.156) for 2 and 3. With regard to asthenic quality, there was concordance of 100% for observers 1 and 2, so κ could not be applied; the concordance rate was 96.5% for 1 and 3 and for 2 and 3. The evaluation for strained voice revealed concordance rates of 71.9% for observers 1 and 2 (κ = −0.017); 59.6% for 1 and 3 (κ = 0.095) and 70.2% (κ = 0.039) for 2 and 3. The disagreement among the observers was worst for pathological rather than normal voices; when disagreement was present among experienced judges, it was of only one point in the scale used.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.