Volume 23, Issue 3 pp. 1109-1127
Primary Research Article
Full Access

Rapid carbon loss and slow recovery following permafrost thaw in boreal peatlands

Miriam C. Jones

Corresponding Author

Miriam C. Jones

U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 20192 USA

Correspondence: Miriam C. Jones, tel. 703 648 6936, fax 703 648 6953, e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer Harden

Jennifer Harden

U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan O'Donnell

Jonathan O'Donnell

National Park Service, Anchorage, AK, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kristen Manies

Kristen Manies

U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Torre Jorgenson

Torre Jorgenson

Ecoscience, Fairbanks, AK, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Claire Treat

Claire Treat

U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA

University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephanie Ewing

Stephanie Ewing

Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 June 2016
Citations: 84

Abstract

Permafrost peatlands store one-third of the total carbon (C) in the atmosphere and are increasingly vulnerable to thaw as high-latitude temperatures warm. Large uncertainties remain about C dynamics following permafrost thaw in boreal peatlands. We used a chronosequence approach to measure C stocks in forested permafrost plateaus (forest) and thawed permafrost bogs, ranging in thaw age from young (<10 years) to old (>100 years) from two interior Alaska chronosequences. Permafrost originally aggraded simultaneously with peat accumulation (syngenetic permafrost) at both sites. We found that upon thaw, C loss of the forest peat C is equivalent to ~30% of the initial forest C stock and is directly proportional to the prethaw C stocks. Our model results indicate that permafrost thaw turned these peatlands into net C sources to the atmosphere for a decade following thaw, after which post-thaw bog peat accumulation returned sites to net C sinks. It can take multiple centuries to millennia for a site to recover its prethaw C stocks; the amount of time needed for them to regain their prethaw C stocks is governed by the amount of C that accumulated prior to thaw. Consequently, these findings show that older peatlands will take longer to recover prethaw C stocks, whereas younger peatlands will exceed prethaw stocks in a matter of centuries. We conclude that the loss of sporadic and discontinuous permafrost by 2100 could result in a loss of up to 24 Pg of deep C from permafrost peatlands.

Introduction

Peatlands account for nearly 30% of the soil organic carbon (C) within the northern permafrost region, storing 277–302 Pg of organic C (Tarnocai et al., 2009; Hugelius et al., 2014), which is equivalent to over one-third of the C currently in the atmosphere (Houghton, 2007). The presence of permafrost and waterlogged soils in northern peatlands has facilitated the long-term accumulation of C by slowing rates of microbial decomposition. However, recent warming at high latitudes has accelerated permafrost thaw in northern peatlands (Payette et al., 2004; Camill, 2005), which can enhance decomposition and release C from formerly frozen peat deposits (e.g., O'Donnell et al., 2012a) and can increase emissions of methane (CH4) as the peat surface becomes inundated (Turetsky et al., 2002; Wickland et al., 2006; Johnston et al., 2014; Klapstein et al., 2014).

Permafrost thaw may result in a positive feedback to atmospheric warming depending on whether C losses from thawing soils outweigh C gains in soils and vegetation (Koven et al., 2011; Schuur et al., 2015). Most studies predict net C loss and positive feedback to warming (Koven et al., 2011; Schuur et al., 2015), with large amounts of permafrost degradation by the end of the century. As much as 40% to 90% of continuous and discontinuous permafrost area may thaw by the end of the century (Lawrence and Slater, 2005). For peatlands, studies estimate that 20% of permafrost peat by volume may be lost, the equivalent of 33 Pg of C (Wisser et al., 2011). However, complex and heterogeneous geomorphology and landscape history of the boreal and arctic landscape increase the difficulty in making accurate large-scale projections of carbon cycle feedbacks to permafrost thaw (Jorgenson et al., 2001).

The presence of permafrost influences local hydrology and vegetation composition in peatlands (Camill, 1999; Jorgenson et al., 2013; Connon et al., 2015), which impacts the amount, chemical composition, and decomposability of C stored in these settings (Treat et al., 2014). In the boreal discontinuous permafrost zone of western North America, peatland permafrost plateaus contain a relatively well-drained active layer that can support trees such as black spruce (Picea mariana), ericaceous shrubs, feathermoss (Pleurozium schreberi, Hylocomium splendens), and lichen (Cladonia spp), and Sphagnum fuscum in wetter locations (Camill et al., 2009). Permafrost can form syngenetically with peat accumulation (Kanevskiy et al., 2014), but permafrost can also form epigenetically, or after peat or sediment has already been deposited (e.g., Zoltai, 1993). As C at the base of the active layer becomes incorporated into the permafrost, it suspends decomposition (Strauss et al., 2015), a process that stabilizes C, until permafrost thaw occurs. Permafrost thaw in ice-rich peat plateaus typically results in thermokarst development, characterized by subsidence of the ground surface, resulting in inundation that causes tree mortality and transforms the dominant vegetation to wetter species such as Sphagnum riparium and Carex aquatilis. These thawed bogs are called collapse-scar bogs, as the landscape physically collapses with the conversion of ice to water in these relatively ice-rich peat and underlying mineral deposits (Kanevskiy et al., 2014).

Several studies have recognized changes in C inputs and losses of thawing landscapes, but debate remains about whether C stocks increase or decrease following permafrost thaw (i.e., Robinson & Moore, 1999, 2000; Camill et al., 2001; O'Donnell et al., 2012a; Jones et al., 2013). Long-term peat C accumulation is impacted by net primary production (NPP) and decomposition. Studies have shown that NPP increases following permafrost thaw (Camill, 1999; Camill et al., 2001), but decomposition rates also change. Following thaw, inundation of the peat surface decreases aerobic decomposition that occurred in the active layer prior to thaw, and decomposition changes to much slower anaerobic decomposition, resulting in rapid accumulation of post-thaw peat (Camill, 1999; Robinson & Moore, 1999, 2000; Camill et al., 2001; Jones et al., 2013). However, a multisite comparison of peat accumulation rates among permafrost peat plateaus and collapse-scar bogs found no significant difference in long-term accumulation rates for the past millennium (Treat et al., 2016). Despite high accumulation rates, collapse-scar bogs have higher CH4 emissions than permafrost plateaus (Turetsky et al., 2002; Christensen et al., 2004; Wickland et al., 2006; Johnston et al., 2014). Most studies have shown that CH4 emissions (Klapstein et al., 2014) and pore water DOC (Chanton et al., 1995, 2008) in peatlands are the product of growing season productivity. Based on the dominance of growing season processes in C exchange and the switch to an anaerobic environment, it has been assumed that the loss of deep peat C is not a significant contributor to post-thaw C loss. However, a comparison of multiple cores from a collapse-scar bog chronosequence (i.e., space-for-time since permafrost thaw) in west-central Alaska suggests a significant portion of the formerly frozen plateau peat decomposes in the years to decades following thaw (O'Donnell et al., 2012a).

Because of these conflicting findings, considerable debate remains about the fate of former permafrost C following thaw and whether collapse-scar bogs turn from a C sink into a C source or whether they enhance their ability to store C (Camill 1999; O'Donnell et al., 2012a; Jones et al., 2013; Turetsky et al., 2000; Turetsky et al., 2007). Single-core analyses bias our understanding toward only the C that remains in the core, without providing a context for what may have been lost, while the chronosequence approach enables us to observe C stocks from initial to late stages of thaw but only within decades to centuries. O'Donnell et al. (2012a) employed the chronosequence approach and concluded that the timing of thaw has large impacts on the overall C storage capacity of a peat plateau complex. Similarly, Johnston et al. (2014) found differences in growing season CH4 efflux increased over decades following thaw, but smaller C stocks were apparent in thaw features found to be one to two decades old. These two studies assume that the primary difference among the points along the chronosequence was difference in timing of permafrost thaw. However, in addition to timing of permafrost thaw, the boreal landscape also exhibits large spatial heterogeneity with respect to peat initiation. Consequently, both peatland initiation and thaw timing must be explored in order to more accurately understand C gains and losses with time.

In this study, we evaluate the assumptions of the chronosequence and mass balance modeling approach used by O'Donnell et al. (2012a), including that each site along the chronosequence would have formed at the same time in the same way, in order to address the C dynamics following permafrost thaw. We re-examine multiple cores from permafrost plateaus and collapse-scar bogs at the Koyukuk NWR sites of O'Donnell et al. (2012a) and sites within the Innoko NWR (Jorgenson et al., 2013; Johnston et al., 2014; Kanevskiy et al., 2014). The landscape development processes between the two sites are similar, but the Koyukuk NWR peats are nearly twice as old as the Innoko NWR peats, making them ideal candidates for studying the impact of peat initiation age on thaw C dynamics. We critically assess some of the assumptions made in O'Donnell et al. (2012a,b) and modify how C stocks within the permafrost plateau are calculated. We also build on the mass balance approach used by O'Donnell et al. (2012a) to track the changes in and controls on peatland C balance from decades to millennia. Our goal is to incorporate C input and decomposition parameters into a simple and generalizable mass balance model (Harden et al., 2000; O'Donnell et al., 2011, 2012a) based on a modified chronosequence approach to simulate C accumulation and loss from peat initiation through permafrost thaw during the Holocene.

Materials and methods

Regional setting

The Innoko National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) (63.57°N, 157.72°W), a part of the Yukon River basin, is located in western Alaska and consists of 12 540 km2 of low-lying land surrounding the Innoko River (Fig. 1). Wetlands comprise more than half of the Innoko NWR (Jorgenson et al., 2013), and sediments are composed of Pleistocene and Holocene flood plain deposits, including alluvial, colluvial, glacial, and aeolian deposits (Patton et al., 2009). The Koyukuk NWR (65.19°N, 155.36°W), located to the northeast of Innoko NWR, spans from the southern foothills of the Brooks Range to the Yukon River and covers 14 160 km2 adjacent to the Koyukuk River (Fig. 1). Most of this area experienced aeolian silt deposition during the late Pleistocene (Muhs et al., 2003; Muhs & Budahn, 2006). This ice-rich, silty soil, referred to as yedoma, contains massive ice wedges that can be 10 m wide and 50 m high (Kanevskiy et al., 2014).

Details are in the caption following the image
Innoko study area shown on the map of Alaska (black star). Black dot is the Koyukuk study area (O'Donnell et al., 2012a). Coring locations are shown on the areal image of the Innoko study area. Dark black/blue areas represent open water, orange represents Sphagnum-dominated mats over open water, dark green and white areas are the permafrost plateaus with black spruce and lichen, and the bright green are recently formed collapse-scar bogs.

The locations of both the Innoko and Koyukuk NWR study sites comprise a heterogeneous landscape, consisting of permafrost plateaus interspersed with collapse-scar bogs and fens, that ultimately was born out of the thawing of ice wedges in Pleistocene frozen loess (yedoma). These ice-rich loess deposits were subject to rapid thaw during the warm early Holocene in Alaska, resulting in widespread thermokarst lake development (Kaufman et al., 2004; Walter et al., 2007; Kanevskiy et al., 2014; Anthony et al., 2014). Subsequent lake drainage, coupled with peat accumulation under a cooler mid-Holocene climate (Jones and Yu, 2010), resulted in syngenetic or quasi-syngenetic permafrost aggradation in drained lake basins (Kaufman et al., 2004; Jones et al., 2012; Kanevskiy et al., 2014) and the formation of permafrost plateaus (Kanevskiy et al., 2014). Discontinuous permafrost, ranging from 10 to 130 m thick (Kanevskiy et al., 2014), is found in this region today. Permafrost occurs mainly in uplifted permafrost plateaus, which are interspersed with collapse-scar bogs and fens that generally lack permafrost in the top 2–3 m of soil. The high ice content of permafrost plateaus, coupled with warming air temperatures in the region, has increased the vulnerability of these sites to develop thermokarst features, such as collapse-scar bogs and fens (O'Donnell et al., 2012a,b; Kanevskiy et al., 2014; Nossov et al., 2015).

The climate of the region is continental, with a mean annual air temperature (MAAT) at Galena of −3.8 °C from 1971 to present (Alaska Climate Research Center. http://climate.gi.alaska.edu). July is the warmest month (20.4 °C), January is the coldest (−26.9 °C), and annual precipitation averages 331 mm, with 40% falling from July to September. Precipitation typically falls as snow from October to April, and average snow thicknesses are typically 50 cm.

Vegetation is similar at Innoko and Koyukuk (Jorgenson et al., 2013). Vegetation on permafrost peat plateaus is dominated by black spruce (Picea mariana) with a Sphagnum fuscum-dominated understory (Jorgenson et al., 2013; Johnston et al., 2014). The understory of drier plateaus is dominated by feathermosses (Pleurozium schreberi and Hylocomium splendens) and lichen (Cladonia spp.). Other common understory species are Rhododendron groenlandicum, Vaccinium uligunosum, and Betula nana. Wetter collapse-scar bogs are dominated by Sphagnum riparium, S. jensenii, S. lindbergii, and Eriophorum scheuchzeri. Drier, later stage collapse-scar bogs are dominated by S. balticum, S. flexuosum, S. lenense, Andromeda polifolia, Oxycoccus microcarpus, and Rhododendron palustre.

We used a chronosequence approach to understand the trajectories of C storage following thaw by coring numerous locations from various stages of thaw at Innoko NWR (Fig. 1; see also Johnston et al., 2014). To do this, we sampled the centers of the permafrost plateau with a Sphagnum fuscum understory (mesic permafrost plateau) and along drying margins of the plateau that contained a feathermoss understory (drying margin [DM]). Based on information from prior studies (O'Donnell et al., 2012a; Johnston et al., 2014) about the age of the features, we sampled nearby collapse-scar bogs and categorized them based on physical features and vegetation composition (Jorgenson et al., 2013; Johnston et al., 2014), where in the field, small features (<10 m2) with earliest successional post-thaw vegetation (S. riparium, S. lindbergii) were assumed to be young (young bog), medium-sized features with early successional post-thaw vegetation (S. riparium, S. lindbergii, Eriophorum scheuchzerii) were assumed to have initially thawed in the last few decades (intermediate bog), and large features with late-successional vegetation were assumed to have thawed several centuries ago (old bog), assumptions that have previously been demonstrated in similar published chronosequence studies (O'Donnell et al., 2012a,b; Johnston et al., 2014). We confirmed the ages of these thaw features with radiometric dating and dendrochronology (O'Donnell et al., 2012a,b). At Innoko, samples collected in 2009 indicated that thaw occurred 14–21 years ago in young bogs, 30–60 years ago in intermediate bogs and 200–1400 years ago in old bogs (Johnston et al., 2014). At Koyukuk NWR (details provided in O'Donnell et al., 2012a,b), permafrost thaw ranged from 31 to 61 years ago in young bogs and 400–1200 years ago in old bogs (O'Donnell et al., 2012a). The basal peat ages of the features studied were early Holocene (~7500 to ~10 000 cal yr BP) in age (O'Donnell et al., 2012a), while younger basal ages were indicated at Innoko (~3500 cal yr BP; Kanevskiy et al., 2014).

Field and laboratory sampling

Field sampling of the Innoko chronosequence occurred in 2009 and 2012 in the Innoko Flats NWR near Horseshoe Lake. Permafrost cores from the peat plateaus were collected using the Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Establishment (SIPRE) permafrost corer (Rand & Mellor, 1985) and cores were collected from the collapse-scar bogs using a Russian peat auger. Cores were described and subdivided following the similar methodology to O'Donnell et al. (2012b), reflecting a modification of USDA-NRCS (Soil Survey Staff, 1998) and Canadian (Soil Classification Working Group, 1998) methods. The lithology and plant macrofossils were described to identify transitions from limnic sediments to frozen peat plateau and thaw (Table S1). Subsamples were oven-dried, ground, and analyzed for C and N using a Carlo Erba NA1500 elemental analyzer. C stocks were calculated for each core (Table 1). C stocks for Koyukuk (Table 2) are updated values for Koyukuk from O'Donnell et al. (2012a,b) and for Innoko 2009 samples from Johnston et al. (2014). Changes reflect differences in gap-filling methodologies for % C and bulk density (see Jorgenson et al., 2013; for more information).

Table 1. Summary of basal ages and transitions in Innoko cores. Dating was performed using both 14C and 210Pb, using the constant rate of supply (CRS) method to attain ages. Ages are reported in calendar years before 1950 in order to be consistent with 14C age reporting
Laboratory ID Core ID Depth (cm) Age type CRS age (cal yr BP) Uncalibrated age (yr BP) Error Calibrated 2–sigma age range (cal yr BP) Best fit Median age from Bacon age model (cal yr BP) Stratigraphic significance
WW8370 Old Bog 1 80 Radiocarbon 120 35 10–150, 185–273 411 Transition to thaw
WW7896 Old Bog 1 100 Radiocarbon 950 25 795–887 750 Basal peat above limnic sediments
WW9261 Old Bog 2 165 Radiocarbon 870 25 726–801 817 Transition to thaw
WW9262 Old Bog 2 176 Radiocarbon 1885 25 1767–1764 1273 Basal forest peat
WW7759 Old Bog 3 115 Radiocarbon 1470 20 1310–1392 1263 Transition to thaw
WW7760 Old Bog 3 119 Radiocarbon 1735 25 1568–1707 1525 Basal forest peat
WW9282 Old Bog 3 153 Radiocarbon 1495 25 1312–1414 1439 Transition to thaw
WW9309 Old Bog 3 164 Radiocarbon 1780 35 1609–1817 1615 Basal peat above limnic sediments
Intermediate Bog 2 32 210-Pb, CRS 15.00 13.4 Transition to thaw
WW9280 Intermediate Bog 2 101 Radiocarbon 2105 30 1996–2149 2060 First transition to thaw; 87–101 is a water pocket
WW9259 Intermediate Bog 2 124 Radiocarbon 2675 25 2749–2799 2771 Basal peat above limnic sediments
WW8373 Intermediate Bog 3 60 210-Pb, CRS −28.00 15.2 Transition to thaw
Intermediate Bog 3 139 No date; age model derived 3926 Basal peat above limnic sediments
Young Bog 1 19 210-Pb, CRS −42.00 2.6 Transition to thaw
WW7761 Young Bog 1 65 Radiocarbon 225 20 126–166 148 Basal forest peat
Young Bog 2 25 210-Pb, CRS −44.40 0.9 Transition to thaw
WW7861 Young Bog 2 48 Radiocarbon 36.11 420 25
WW7762 Young Bog 2 53 Radiocarbon 1430 30 1293–1376
Young Bog 2 58 No date; age model derived; high uncertainty 2387 Basal peat above limnic sediments
Mesic PP 2 2 210-Pb, CRS −57.86 0.4
Mesic PP 2 4 210-Pb, CRS −56.50 0.5
Mesic PP 2 6 210-Pb, CRS −53.47 0.7
Mesic PP 2 8 210-Pb, CRS −48.27 1.2
Mesic PP 2 10 210-Pb, CRS −42.29 1.6
Mesic PP 2 15 210-Pb, CRS −29.74 3.7
Mesic PP 2 20 210-Pb, CRS −25.87 3.9
Mesic PP 2 25 210-Pb, CRS −20.00 4.6
Mesic PP 2 30 210-Pb, CRS −0.34 9.3
Mesic PP 2 33 210-Pb, CRS 19.00 18.5
Mesic PP 2 38 210-Pb, CRS 40.54 39.4
WW7899 Mesic PP 2 60 Radiocarbon 600 30 577–653 539
WW7978 Mesic PP 2 90 Radiocarbon 1935 30 1820–1949 1685
WW8374 Permafrost Plateau DM 1 104 Radiocarbon 2160 35 1940–2315 2128 Basal peat above limnic sediments
  • PP, permafrost plateau; DM, drying margin.
Table 2. C stocks and apparent C accumulation rates for bog and permafrost plateau peats for each core at Innoko and Koyukuk. C accumulation rates could only be calculated for cores with basal and transitional ages
Thickness of Bog peat Thickness of forest peat Basal age C in Forest peat C in bog peat Total C in peat Full-profile apparent C accumulation rates Post-thaw apparent C accumulation rates
cm cm cal yr BP kg m−2 kg m−2 kg m−2 g C m−2 yr−1 g C m−2 yr−1
Innoko
Permafrost Plateau (mesic) 1 0 95 1840 64.4 64.4 35.0 n.a.
Permafrost Plateau (mesic) 2 0 105 n.d. 45.7 45.7 n.a.
Permafrost Plateau (mesic) 3 0 113 n.d. 51.2 51.2 n.a.
Permafrost Plateau DM 1 0 104+ 2129 >90.2 >90.2 42.4 n.a.
Permafrost Plateau DM 2 0 105+ n.d. >61.9 >61.0 n.a.
Permafrost Plateau DM 3 0 82 n.d. 54.2 54.2 n.a.
Young Bog 1 19 46 290 16.3 2.5 18.8 56.2 507.5
Young Bog 2 25 33 n.d. 12.5 1.6 14.1 146.1
Young Bog 3 16 48 n.d. 39.6 5.1 44.7
Intermediate Bog 1 21 87+ n.d. >34.5 1.4 35.9
Intermediate Bog 2 32 107 486 14.1 2.8 16.9 34.8 37.1
Intermediate Bog 3 60 79 3643 29.8 5.5 35.3 9.7 138.1
Old Bog 1 80 20 675 7.8 18.9 26.7 28.0 82.6
Old Bog 2a 165 10 1826 9.7 53.7 63.4 29.4 70.3
Old Bog 3 115 39 1713 39.1 53.0 92.1 31.0 39.2
Koyukuk
Permafrost Plateau 1 175 7830 77.9 77.9 9.9
Permafrost Plateau 2 405 10435 203.5 203.5 19.4
Permafrost Plateau 3 248 n.d. 128.1 128.1
Young Bog 1 12 188 >66.5 0.6 >67.1 11.5
Young Bog 2 10 132 63.1 0.8 63.9 13.5
Young Bog 3 19 21 >8.8 3.2 >12 103.2
Young Bog 4 29 244 95.1 4 99.1 74.1
Young Bog 5 20 40 >10 1.1 >11.1 19.1
Young Bog 6 16 286 135 1.7 136.7 51.4
Old Bog 1 290 180 53.6 35.3 29.5
Old Bog 2 250 40 20.3 35.3
Old Bog 3 87 100 39.5 20.3 48.8
  • n.d., not determined; + = basal peat not reached; ≥ minimum values because basal peat not reached.

Radiometric dating

We used two radiogenic isotopes, lead-210 (210Pb) and radiocarbon (14C), to estimate age of ecosystem transitions, following the results for 2009 cores reported in Johnston et al. (2014) and updated with new core data. Both dating methods were used to constrain the ages of transition from limnic sediments to peat (indicating a lake drainage event) and from permafrost plateau to collapse-scar bog (indicating permafrost thaw, collapse, and inundation). We used both plant macrofossils and peat type as evidence for these transitions (Table 2; Table S1). 210Pb and 226Ra was measured by gamma spectrometry using a Princeton Gamma HPGe germanium well detector. Unsupported 210Pb was defined as the difference between measured total 210Pb and 226Ra. Horizon subsamples from each soil profile were measured until unsupported 210Pb was not detectable. We used the constant rate of supply (CRS) method to calculate ages of basal horizon depths (Appleby & Oldfield, 1978). To account for compaction, we modeled unsupported 210Pb as a function of cumulative dry mass (g cm−2) instead of depth. Uncertainties in 210Pb from the CRS method are based on error analysis described in Van Metre & Fuller (2009). Although mobility of 210Pb has been raised as a potential problem when dating surface organic soil layers (Urban et al., 1990), our data suggest that 210Pb mobility is not an issue at our sites, based on the similar surficial 210Pb and 14C-based ages found for the Innoko site by Johnston et al. (2014; Fig. S1).

For deeper peat stratigraphy, plant macrofossils were identified and picked for 14C dating. If macrofossils were not available, we submitted bulk peat picked free of roots. Samples were graphitized at the USGS Radiocarbon Laboratories in Reston, VA, and 14C measurements were determined at the Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (CAMS), Lawrence Livermore National Lab in Livermore, CA. Radiocarbon ages were calibrated Calib 7.1 (Reimer et al., 2013), and age models were generated on selected cores using the Bayesian age-depth modeling program BACON (Blaauw & Christen, 2011), which uses IntCal13 14C age calibration curves (Reimer et al., 2013). Age models were generated using all available 210Pb and 14C ages (Table 1, Table S1) to constrain the timing of transition between our dated profiles. Johnston et al. (2014) compared 210Pb and 14C age results from Innoko to a pair of sites at Koyukuk Flats, Alaska, and found close agreement of age methods in shallow peat samples, validating the use of both 210Pb and 14C to generate age models of the sites (Fig. S1). The age models helped constrain the timing of transitions between our dated depth intervals when no age was obtained at a transition (Table 1).

Constraining rates of soil carbon accumulation and loss

To quantify C stocks in each of our cores along a chronosequence, we first calculated cumulative C stocks (kg m−2) within each stratum of a given core. These strata are as follows (Fig. 2): permafrost plateau peat (thawed and currently frozen forest peat from within the permafrost plateau forest), forest peat (formerly frozen permafrost plateau peat, now a part of the collapse-scar bog), and bog peat (collapse-scar bog peat that has accumulated over the forest peat). We also calculated apparent C accumulation rates (g C m−2 yr−1), or the product of C densities and the peat accretion rate (cm yr−1) across sites. We assumed that the net change in C stocks (kg C m−2) over time is controlled by annual C inputs (I; kg C m−2 yr−1) and the fractional first-order decomposition constant (k; yr1) and C stocks in a given year (C(t)) (Clymo, 1984; Trumbore and Harden, 1997; O'Donnell et al., 2012a). The C balance for any given year can then be determined from the equation

Details are in the caption following the image
Schematic showing the three peat C pools tracked in this study: permafrost plateau, formerly frozen permafrost plateau (forest peat), and post-thaw, collapse-scar bog (bog) peat. Names in parentheses correspond to the category names in the text. In previous studies, it was assumed that the time that the forest peat was frozen is the same as the current permafrost plateau. In this study, we recognize that the current permafrost plateau has had longer to accumulate C than the currently thawed forest peat and also that it initiated at a different time. We now account for the differences in these stocks in our model (see methods for more detail).
urn:x-wiley:13541013:media:gcb13403:gcb13403-math-0001(1)
Assuming the initial OC concentration is zero, solving Eqn 1 yields
urn:x-wiley:13541013:media:gcb13403:gcb13403-math-0002(2)

We estimated the C accumulation rates in the permafrost plateaus by fitting Eqn 2 to the C stocks of the entire organic soil profile vs. the radiocarbon age at the base of the peat profile and fitting the C input rate (Ipermafrost) and the decomposition constant (kpermafrost) using the measured data (Trumbore and Harden, 1997; Clymo, 1984). We estimated post-thaw C accumulation rates in the bog peat strata by measuring C stored in only these strata across the collapse-scar bog chronosequence, using similar methods as O'Donnell et al. (2012a), fitting Eqn 2 to the relationship between the C stored bog peat (C(t)) and collapse-scar bog age (t), which was based on either 14C dating or 210Pb. Using this relationship, we were able to estimate the C input rate (Ibog) and decomposition constant (kbog) for bog peat.

For this study, we expand upon the work of O'Donnell et al. (2012a) by disentangling the effects of peatland initiation age (and subsequent permafrost aggradation) and the timing of permafrost thaw on post-thaw C loss and recovery. Our approach differs in several key respects. First, as basal ages suggest that each site initiated as a peatland at a different time, we first incorporated peatland initiation ages, which were not considered by O'Donnell et al. (2012a). Second, we calculated the absolute time that each thawed feature was a permafrost plateau (basal age minus thaw age), rather than assuming that the forest peat was the same age as the extant permafrost plateau, and therefore would have the same amount of C stocks, as the still-frozen permafrost plateau. Using these dates, we developed regression equations of C stocks vs. time for the permafrost plateau cores and forest peat C stocks, which allowed us to more accurately calculate the total C loss from the formerly frozen peat plateau.

O'Donnell et al. (2012a) used an exponential decay equation to determine the loss of organic carbon (OC) stocks from the forest peat along each stage of the chronosequence:
urn:x-wiley:13541013:media:gcb13403:gcb13403-math-0003(3)
where y0 is the y-intercept going through zero at the time of thaw, a is the asymptote, k is the decomposition constant for the thawed forest peat, and t is time since thaw. However, this approach assumes that the permafrost plateau peat should have comparable stocks to the forest peat in the thawed bog cores and any difference between the peat plateau C stocks and the post-thaw forest C stocks within the bog would represent loss. Because the C stocks within the currently frozen peat plateau had longer to accumulate the forest-based C stocks within the thawed bogs, this approach likely overestimates loss. To measure loss of forest-based peat in a way that does not assume that all sites initiated as peatlands at the same time, nor that they thawed at the same time, we took the following steps. First, we generated two regression slopes. The first equation modeled the C stocks of the still-frozen permafrost plateau peat C stocks vs. the amount of time each site has had permafrost (tplateau; where tplateau = tbasal - tsampling; Figs 2 and S2b). The second regression equation modeled the post-thaw forest peat C stocks vs. the amount of time the site had permafrost (tforest; where tforest = tbasal - tthaw; Figs 2, 4b and S2b). Next, we computed the predicted amount of permafrost plateau-based forest peat C (C0) based on tplateau, as determined by the first regression equation, and the amount of forest peat C (tforest) remaining after thaw (Ct; Fig. 4b). This procedure was performed for each collapse-scar bog core for which we had both a basal and thaw date (and thus could calculate tforest). Finally, we plotted the fraction of initial forest peat C remaining (Ct/C0) on a natural log scale, to obtain the asymptote (a) and decomposition constant (k), fitting kforest and a empirically at time t after permafrost thaw using the equation
urn:x-wiley:13541013:media:gcb13403:gcb13403-math-0004(4)

Given the relatively small sample size and degree of scatter in the C stock vs. years as plateau peat for our Innoko and Koyukuk data, we increased the sample size by including sites with similar features from across the northern discontinuous permafrost zone (SI Fig. 2b; Treat et al., 2016). We used a linear regression to test the significance of the relationship between age and C stock, as well as a site-by-age interaction that would indicate that the relationship differed among sites. The interaction term was not significant (P = 0.664) and inclusion of site as an explanatory variable did not significantly improve the model fit (F3,15 = 0.4, = 0.78).

Mass balance model of OC accumulation and loss

In order to move beyond the limitations of understanding the evolution of peat C in response to permafrost aggradation and degradation, we also used a simple mass balance model, originally developed to evaluate the effects of wildfire on ecosystem C balance in the boreal region (Harden et al., 2000), and subsequently modified to examine the interactive effects of wildfire and permafrost on C balance (O'Donnell et al., 2011) and the effects of permafrost thaw on C dynamics in boreal peatlands (O'Donnell et al., 2012a). We modified it further to reconstruct peat C accumulation and loss using the data to determine the I, k, and a parameters from Eqns 2 and 4, above. Briefly, we used a ‘forward’ modeling approach (e.g., Zhuang et al., 2002) with peatland initiation timing and thermokarst events scheduled at specific times during the model run to reflect peatland development and collapse-scar bog formation dates observed across the chronosequence. The model operates on decadal time steps, tracking changes in C stocks calculated by Eqn 1. To initiate each model run, we simulated prethaw C accumulation using averaged Ipermafrost and kpermafrost values derived from the Koyukuk and Innoko permafrost plateaus. Next, we prescribed a thermokarst event, which was designed to reflect a transition from permafrost plateau to collapse-scar bog. To model post-thaw C accumulation and loss, we separately tracked bog peat C using Ibog and kbog parameters, and thawed forest peat C using the kforest parameter, as observed across the chronosequences.

We conducted a full factorial model simulation using a spreadsheet model to examine the interactive effects of peatland initiation time (10, 7, 5, 3.5, and 2 ki years BP; ki = peatland initiation in thousands of years) and permafrost thaw timing (100, 500, 750, 1000, 1500 years BP). While O'Donnell et al. (2012a) used site-specific C-cycling parameters in their model, here we bootstrapped the I and k values for both permafrost plateau and post-thaw peat accumulation for the Innoko and Koyukuk data combined, as well as the kforest value for the post-thaw forest peat C loss (Table 3; O'Donnell et al., 2012a). This process generated 1500 randomized samples, for which we took the mean of the values within the 95% confidence intervals for our model. Because the forest loss could only be constrained by initiation ages and thaw ages for Innoko due to a lack of adequate age control in Koyukuk cores, the decomposition of forest loss is based solely on Innoko data, although the goal was to develop a more generalizable model for peatlands with thawing permafrost in the boreal region.

Table 3. Summary of peat carbon accumulation parameters and statistics for Koyukuk and Innoko NWR study region
I (g C m−2 yr−1) k (yr−1) r 2 P
Koyukuk Permafrost plateau
(O'Donnell et al., 2012a,b) Observed data 23 ± 8 0.0001 ± 0.0001 0.93 <0.0001
Model input 15 0.0001
Shallow bog peat
Observed data 61 ± 2 0.0014 ± 0.0004 0.98 <0.0001
Model input 61 0.0018
Thawed forest peat
Observed data 0.0140 ± 0.0093 0.78 0.1
Model input 0.0047
Innoko Permafrost plateau
(This study) Observed data 25 ± 2 0.0004 ± 0.00001 1.00 <0.0001
Model input 25 0.0004
Shallow bog peat
Observed data 82.8 ± 2 0.002 ± 0.0004 0.99 <0.0001
Thawed forest peat
Observed data 0.0002 0.68
Combined Parameters, model input Permafrost Plateau 24 (22–26) 0.00025 (0.0001–0.0004)
Shallow bog peat 71.9 (59–85) 0.0017 (0.001–0.0024)
Thawed forest peat 0.0001868
Thawed forest peat for model 0.0002 (0.00002–0.0006)

Results

Permafrost plateaus and forest peat beneath intermediate and old bogs at Innoko began accumulating peat following drainage of a thermokarst lake between 2000 and 3500 cal yr BP, as inferred from the presence of lake sediments beneath the peat (SI Table 1; Kanevskiy et al., 2014). Forest peats beneath the young collapse bogs at Innoko are significantly younger (~250–1500 cal yr BP) than the forest peats under the intermediate and old bogs (~2000–3500 cal yr BP; Table 2), based on radiocarbon measurements of peat. The forest peat underlying the young bogs, therefore, formed later and also thawed most recently. In contrast, the Koyukuk forest peat initiated ~7500 to 10 000 cal yr BP (Table 1; O'Donnell et al., 2012a). At both sites, thermokarst drainage was mostly rapid, reflected by a sharp transition between the lake sediments and the accumulation of peat indicative of a black spruce forest peat plateau (e.g., spruce needles, ericaceous shrubs, feather moss) typically associated with permafrost plateaus. In few cases at Innoko, wet fen vegetation (mostly sedges and Sphagnum riparium) formed initially, followed by quick succession to a forested bog (Sphagnum spp., ericaceous shrubs, and black spruce trees), most likely indicative of permafrost aggradation. The cryostratigraphy in the frozen peat cores collected from the permafrost plateau indicates that freezing occurred syngenetically in the case of rapid lake drainage, or quasi-syngenetically in the case of slower or incomplete lake drainage (Kanevskiy et al., 2014). Plant macrofossils in one of the plateau cores from Innoko suggest initial thawing and eventual refreezing, indicating that permafrost aggradation occurred epigenetically for at least a portion of the record (Kanevskiy et al., 2014; Table S1).

Core-based data from the Innoko chronosequence

Total peat C stocks (forest peat) were higher in the permafrost plateaus than the total peat C stocks (forest peat + collapse-scar bog peat) in the young and intermediate bogs, but about the same as the old bog (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 3a). The similar basal ages of the intermediate and old bogs, and the difference in their overall stocks, suggest that forest peat was lost as a result of thawing (Table 1; Fig. 3a). The young bogs, however, had relatively low overall total C stocks and highly variable basal ages, leading to substantial uncertainty in assessing their peat loss. Apparent long-term C accumulation rates for the new peat formed in collapse-scar bog (bog peat) are highest in the youngest bogs (327 ± 255 g C m−2 yr−1) and decrease with time since collapse (113 ± 100 g C m−2 yr−1 for intermediate and 64.0 ± 22 g C m−2 yr−1 for old) (Table 2; Fig. 3c). The permafrost plateau sites have much lower long-term apparent C accumulation rates compared with collapse-scar bog peat (35 g C m−2 yr−1 for the mesic plateau and 42.4 g C m−2 yr−1 for the drying margin Fig. 3c). The median C/N ratios of frozen forest peat in permafrost plateaus, not including the uppermost fresh peat litter, and bog peat in young, intermediate, and old bogs were similar, while the median C/N ratio in thawed forest peat underlying bog peat was half that of peat in permafrost plateaus (Fig. 3d).

Details are in the caption following the image
Peat stocks, C accumulation rates, and C/N for each chronosequence category from Innoko. The mesic (n = 3) and drying margin (n = 3) have permafrost (permafrost plateau). The young (n = 3), intermediate (n = 2), and old (n = 3) are categorized based on thaw age. (a) Total peat profile C stocks, (b) forest peat C stocks, (c) apparent long-term C accumulation rates, and (d) C/N ratios of the permafrost plateau, thawed bog peat, and former permafrost, ‘forest’ peat. The C/N for the permafrost plateau does not include the uppermost, freshest peat layers.

Regression-based estimates of C loss

The rates of C accumulation in new bog peat and rates of C loss from thawed old forest peat, as estimated through regression modeling, indicate rapid rates of loss of permafrost peat C and slow gains of post-thaw bog peat. C stock changes at both Innoko and Koyukuk showed more rapid accumulation early post-thaw and slower rates thereafter (Fig. 3a). The regression model (Fig. S2b; Fig. 3b) of C stocks with time for sites that remain a permafrost plateau vs. the forest peat in sites that have thawed (Fig. 3b; Fig. S2b) suggests that ~30 ± 20% of the forest peat C had been lost from each of the thermokarst peats (Fig. S2b, Fig. 3b). Using the regression equation for the predicted permafrost plateau C stocks and comparing it to the actual forest C stocks for the forest regression equation, we fitted an exponential decay equation to the data (Fig. 4c; r= 0.68) that allowed for different starting C stocks. Although the k value derived for long-term forest peat loss (= 0.0002) is lower than or on par with both the k constants for the permafrost plateau (k = 0.00025) and bog peat (= 0.0017) (Table 3), losses of forest peat were large (up to 55% after 1500 years) over the long term (Fig. 4b). Bootstrapping the potential k values from the regression curve (Fig. 4c, Table 3) resulted in an overall loss of forest C ranging from 40% to up to 75%, with the largest loss occurring in the first decade.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) C gains from collapse-scar bog peat following permafrost thaw. Red and blue lines show the 95% confidence intervals. (b) Predicted C stocks based on regressions for C stocks of still-frozen permafrost plateaus and the forest peat of formerly frozen plateaus, showing a 28.6% decline in C following thaw. For each curve, the y-intercept is 0, as it is assumed that C at t= 0. (c) Regression used to calculate the asymptote and decomposition constant for forest C following thaw, using the natural log of the percent difference between the actual and the predicted C stocks for the forest peat.

Permafrost thaw model

Peatland initiation age has a large effect on the total loss of C stocks following permafrost thaw (Figs 5 and 6). The sites that initiated as peatlands the longest time ago but that thawed most recently lose the most forest C overall, while the most recently initiated sites that thawed the longest time ago lose the least amount of carbon relative to the prethaw C stocks (Fig. 5a). Thus, the loss is proportional to the starting C stock and therefore older peats lose more C to thawing. C losses ranged from 35 to 45 kg C m−2 in peatlands initiating at 10 ki to ~15 to 5 kg C m−2 in the youngest initiation category (2 ki) (Fig. 5a).

Details are in the caption following the image
The influence of thaw age and initiation age on C stocks and fluxes. (a) Carbon loss (kg m−2) from the permafrost plateau (forest peat) following permafrost thaw, (b) C stocks relative to a permafrost plateau that never thawed, with negative values indicating stocks less than the permafrost plateau and positive values indicating greater stocks than a plateau site than never thawed, (c) C stocks relative to the prethaw C stocks, with negative indicating stocks less than the prethaw stocks and positive values indicating greater stocks than the prethaw stocks, (d) net C fluxes in the decade following permafrost thaw in kg m−2 yr−1.
Details are in the caption following the image
Time series of carbon stocks (kg m−2) since time before present with each plot representing a different time of thaw. Each curve represents a different peatland initiation age. The C/N for the permafrost plateau does not include the uppermost, freshest peat layers.

Peatland initiation age also has an effect on the time it takes for a thermokarst peat to recover the C lost to thaw. The youngest sites recovered C losses after centuries, while the oldest peatlands do not recover their C stocks after 1500 years (Fig. 6). When comparing the C stocks to plateaus that never thawed, the 10ki and 7.5ki categories have lower C stocks in all thaw categories by −7 to −28 kg C m−2 (Fig 5b; negative indicates loss). The two youngest initiation ages (2, 3.5 ki) only have lower C stocks than sites that never thawed in the 100-year thaw category, and end up with more C than permafrost plateau in <500 years (Fig. 5b). The 5 ki peatland category achieves C stocks higher than the permafrost plateau ~1000 years after thaw. All initiation ages that thawed 100 years ago had lower C stocks (−5 to −28 kg C m−2) than prethaw stocks (Fig. 5c). However, overall net C stocks gains relative to prethaw (positive values) were highest in the most recently initiated site that thawed the longest time ago (up to ~35 kg C m−2) (Figs 5c and 6), and only the oldest peatland (10 ki) never gains all of the carbon back it lost following permafrost thaw. Because the asymptote derived from the data is relatively low (a = 4.1184), it continues to lose a significant amount of peat C, totaling 55% of the total stock in the 1500-yr BP thaw category.

For each model scenario, the bog was a net source of C to the atmosphere in the first decade following thaw (Fig. 5d), even after accounting for C gains from bog peat accumulation in the first decade. Losses modeled for the first decade ranged from −3.5 kg C m−2 yr−1 in the 10 ki category and <−0.5 kg C m−2 yr−1 in the 2 ki category. After the first decade, each site returns to a net annual carbon sink (greater bog C accumulation than forest C loss), although C lost to thaw may not be recovered for decades to millennia.

Discussion

Generalized model for C dynamics of thaw

The approach presented here allows for a more generalized model for C dynamics following permafrost thaw, improving upon the chronosequence approach of O'Donnell et al. (2012a,b) and Johnston et al. (2014) by taking into account differences in timing of peat initiation as well as thaw. The results presented here reduce the apparent C loss based on the chronosequence approach used by O'Donnell et al. (2012a) at Koyukuk Flats and Johnston et al. (2014) at Innoko by almost half. Such a generalized model has potential for more regional assessments where landscapes vary in peatland age and timing of thaw. Accounting for the differences in the amount of time that each site existed as a permafrost plateau (basal age – thaw age) allowed for more accurate portrayal of C loss. Because peat accumulates according to Eqn 1, sites that existed as peat plateaus longer would have higher C stocks upon thaw (Figs S3b and 4b).

Post-thaw dynamics of deep peat

The decline in post-thaw C stocks from forest peat, regardless of bog age, suggests that rapid (years to decades) decomposition of forest peat C occurs following permafrost thaw. However, the small number of samples that met the criteria to perform the revised regression analysis results in high uncertainty of the decomposition constant, and using Eqn 4 based on these sparse data points resulted in a range of 40–75% C loss of forest peat after 1500 years in the mass balance model, rather than our regression-based loss of ~30% (Figs 4b and S2b). The long-term decomposition constants of the thawing forest peat are not significantly different from that of the permafrost plateau and the shallow bog peat, which again points toward a rapid, initial loss upon thaw. Initial, rapid loss rates are consistent with those for fresh plant litter (Moore et al., 2007). Therefore, while the regression-based C loss approach is theoretically sound, more data are needed to evaluate the degree and rate of decomposition of forest peat following permafrost thaw. The degree of scatter in our data (Fig. S2b) highlights the variability associated with site-specific conditions, such as differences in hydrology, nutrients, microsite temperature variations, and vegetation (Loisel et al., 2014). The scatter is also likely influenced by the difficulty associated with accurately measuring the timing of transitions (Fig. S3; Jones et al., 2013), due to the influence of thaw slumping and heaving, which can create age reversals and cluster ages around narrow depth horizons. Nonetheless, the ~30% loss calculated from our regression approach (Fig. 4b, c) is in agreement with a 28% anaerobic C loss calculated using a mass balance approach from thawing permafrost in yedoma regions (Walter Anthony et al., 2014), lending support to our results that substantial anaerobic C loss is not unprecedented.

Because a decrease in C/N can indicate decomposition, particularly when peat composition is similar (Kuhry & Vitt, 1996), a decrease in the C/N of the forest peat relative to both the permafrost plateau, not including the uppermost undecomposed peat layers, and the collapse-scar bog peat (Fig. 3d) indicates that forest peat is indeed more decomposed than plateau peat. The transition from frozen to unfrozen state likely accelerates decomposition of labile organic matter in deep forest peat layers, leading to old C loss (O'Donnell et al., 2012a; Olefeldt et al., 2014; Treat et al., 2014), while also simply exposing previously frozen carbon to microbial processes (Schuur et al., 2015).

Collapse-scar bog formation and recovery to prethaw C stocks

C loss from forest peat is slowly recovered with the accumulation of collapse-scar bog peat C. In each thaw category, it takes each peatland several hundred years to a millennium (or more) to recover to its prethaw C stocks, depending on both the peatland initiation age and timing of thaw (Fig. 6). The importance of the initiation age (and therefore prethaw C stocks) can be observed in Figs 5 and 6, where the oldest two initiation categories (10ki, 7ki) cannot recover their prethaw C stocks after 1500 years, similar to what O'Donnell et al. (2012a) found for Koyukuk. This is in part because bog peat accumulation slows with time, while our decomposition constants allow for continued decomposition of the deep peat, albeit slowly. The likelihood of this continued forest peat loss for millennia is low, as it would eventually move to deeper, colder depths where decomposition is limited by oxygen, carbon, and nutrient availability. The source-to-sink timing, as well as the recovery of prethaw stocks, also depends on the rate of bog peat dynamics (input, loss, net accumulation). Differences in post-thaw bog peat accumulation, which likely depend on local site conditions and climate, can result in faster recovery of the C stocks (Fig. 4a).

Environmental, biogeochemical, and physical controls on net C balance

The chronosequence, or space-for-time approach, to understand gains and losses of C in a permafrost peatland following thaw, is useful in that it allows us to evaluate the possible magnitude of C loss from the system. Studies that rely on single-core analyses (Robinson & Moore, 1999, 2000; Myers-Smith et al., 2008; Jones et al., 2013) can only record what remains and therefore conclude that C accumulates faster post-thaw than in permafrost plateaus. Recent studies, however, have found that permafrost peat plateaus, particularly those with syngenetic permafrost, and nonpermafrost peatlands may accumulate at similar rates over long periods (Olefeldt et al., 2012; Treat et al., 2016), suggesting that the inputs may be larger in nonpermafrost peatlands but that they also decompose faster.

The utility of the chronosequence approach in thawing permafrost depends on careful examination of assumptions. First, it assumes that conditions for peat accumulation are the same along each stage of the chronosequence. Factors that could alter the rate of C accumulation include site-level differences in nutrients, hydrology, vegetation, active layer depth, and ice content, which may explain some of the variability in Fig. S2b. Second, it assumes that each location along the chronosequence is equally susceptible to thaw, when in reality, the susceptibility may vary depending on peat thickness, insulative properties of surface vegetation, and ice content (Camill & Clark, 1998). Third, it assumes that each site has only thawed once and it does not consider the impact of fire on C stocks in these sites, which need to be explored to more accurately assess C loss in these fire-prone ecosystems.

In order to evaluate the short-term C dynamics, we can compare our decadal model of net flux rates to field measurements of gaseous flux. Our model results show high rates of C fluxes in the first decade following thaw (Fig 5d), up to 3500 g C m−2 yr−1, which are unreasonably high compared with observed fluxes (e.g., Johnston et al., 2014). The fluxes measured at Innoko during the growing season were lower by an order of magnitude and counteracted by a net uptake of CO2 (Johnston et al., 2014) or near-neutral C losses (e.g., Wickland et al., 2006; Myers-Smith et al., 2008; Euskirchen et al., 2014; Johnston et al., 2014). Given the uncertainty in our data, especially in the youngest thaw categories, we acknowledge that an exponential loss likely overestimates the rate of loss initially and that the loss is more likely to occur over a longer period than years to a few decades.

Growing season efflux likely does not capture total C loss and is dominated by growing season processes (e.g., Prater et al., 2007; Klapstein et al., 2014). However, studies that have quantified the net annual C balance of permafrost thaw are extremely limited. Old C loss has been measured from thawing permafrost using radiocarbon (e.g., Schuur et al., 2009; Nowinski et al., 2010), and nongrowing season C losses amount to 40–50% of total annual flux (Whalen & Reeburgh, 1988; Zona et al., 2016). We note that methane ebullition occurred under snow at Innoko during well installation in April 2011 (Jorgenson MT and Koch J, personal communication), indicating that Johnston et al. (2014) observed only a portion of the annual fluxes. Thus, summer biological activity likely masks deep peat respiration that occurs year-round, which is more likely to be captured during the shoulder seasons (Mastepanov et al., 2008; Song et al., 2012; Pirk et al., 2015).

Physical drivers of peat decomposition

Physical conditions such as temperature, particularly in the case of talik (thaw bulb) formation, also likely factor into the decomposition of the forest peat. At Innoko, the warmest temperatures were observed in the intermediate and old sites (Johnston et al., 2014) and the temperatures at the young bog at Koyukuk were higher than the active layer of the permafrost plateau (O'Donnell et al., 2012a). The high ice content of lowland permafrost plateaus often results in talik formation following permafrost thaw, which remains unfrozen year-round due to the thermal inertia of the water (Jorgenson et al., 2010; O'Donnell et al., 2012a). Indeed, at the young bog site at Koyukuk, the temperature never dropped below 0 °C in the winter (O'Donnell et al., 2012a). These above-freezing temperatures year-round extend active decomposition beyond the growing season. Incubation data, in conjunction with overwinter temperature profiles, have shown high CO2 and CH4 production from a talik in an interior Alaskan collapse-scar bog when compared to the C mass of profiles from adjacent permafrost environments (Waldrop et al., 2013).

High levels of water saturation, leading to oxygen limitation, is commonly given as a reason for low decomposition in peatlands, as oxygen diffusion in water is slow and leads to the energy-inefficient use of alternate electron acceptors for respiration (Schuur et al., 2008). However, the apparent loss of deep C despite high water table following permafrost thaw in the collapse-scar bog suggests other mechanisms are at work in these systems, including changes in nutrient availability (Keuper et al., 2012), microbial communities (Mackelprang et al., 2011; McCalley et al., 2014; Hultman et al., 2015), and biogeochemistry of carbon compounds in frozen soils that result in rapid mineralization upon thaw (Vonk et al., 2013; Drake et al., 2015; Ewing et al., 2015).

Regional landscape implications

The permafrost-affected landscapes at Innoko and Koyukuk are a highly patchy mosaic of permafrost plateaus, collapse-scar bogs and fens, and thermokarst lakes of varying ages (Kanevskiy et al., 2014). Furthermore, the soil stratigraphy reveals that some permafrost plateaus and bogs have undergone previous episodes of thawing and refreezing, which would undoubtedly impact C dynamics. While our model examines the role of different landscape ages to better understand the mechanisms of C gain and loss, this study does not address the fate of C under multiple cycles of permafrost aggradation and degradation. Several studies have demonstrated repeated cycles of freezing and thawing in the discontinuous permafrost zone (Zoltai, 1993; Zoltai, 1995), but the amount of time it takes a site to aggrade permafrost post-thaw is difficult to estimate, due to local and regional differences in ground and air temperatures, hydrology, and vegetation. Furthermore, macrofossil evidence for permafrost aggradation is often indistinguishable from late-successional bog stages (Treat et al., 2016), making it difficult to identify the exact timing of permafrost aggradation in a system.

This mosaic of lakes, bogs, and permafrost plateaus then provides a challenge for integrating the C dynamics of ecosystems with widely varying C accumulation and loss rates across the broader landscape. In the boreal region of central Alaska with discontinuous permafrost, Jorgenson et al. (2008) estimated that 5% of the region had thermokarst terrain and 62% had permafrost and that lowland areas had nearly half (35% of total area) of the permafrost and nearly all of the thermokarst (4%). For comparison, Pastick et al. (2015) estimated that the similar Intermontane Boreal ecoregion had near-surface permafrost (upper 1 m) over 45% of the area. These relatively fine-scale processes represent an important challenge for earth system modelers conducting simulations at the regional and circumboreal scale, particularly given the disproportionate impact of thermokarst on C-cycle feedbacks to the atmosphere.

Boreal lowland landscapes hold a large proportion of the overall soil C (Tarnocai et al., 2009; Hugelius et al., 2014), so the history of permafrost degradation has large implications for carbon emissions. Enhanced atmospheric warming, particularly in high-latitude regions, will increasingly destabilize permafrost, especially in the discontinuous permafrost zone, where mean annual air temperatures can go above 0 °C in any given year. The projected atmospheric warming of 1.8 to >6 °C by 2100 (Vaughan et al., 2013), along with increased frequency and severity of wildfires (Turetsky et al., 2011), will warm ground temperatures and completely destabilize discontinuous permafrost by 2100 (Camill, 2005). Within our broader Innoko study area, we roughly estimate that 40% of the landscape has permafrost, 30% of the landscape has old bogs, 10% has young/intermediate bogs, and 10% has old thermokarst lakes, indicating that most of the permafrost has already thawed. Assuming that the remaining permafrost in this area will thaw during the next century (Jafarov et al., 2012), roughly half of the landscape will have young/intermediate bogs with net C loss and half will have previously thawed terrain, which will have net gains of C. The rapid and massive C losses at the young/intermediate bogs will outweigh the C gains of slowly accumulating old bogs in the next decades to several centuries, but eventually (several centuries to millennia), these peatlands will resume overall C burial and net accumulation.

If we expand this estimate to the entire sporadic and discontinuous permafrost zone, which contain 85.1 Pg of C (Tarnocai et al., 2009; Hugelius et al., 2014), we estimate that up to 24 Pg of deep C could be lost to the atmosphere following thaw in the coming years to centuries (Tarnocai et al., 2009; Hugelius et al., 2014), if all permafrost peatlands follow the trend of deep C loss as in our Alaskan study sites. However, following that initial loss, these landscapes will shift back to net C sinks as bogs develop and offset the initial losses from thaw after centuries or millennia, depending on hydrological settings. Moreover, differences in permafrost aggradation processes and lability of parent material could dampen the quantity C loss (i.e., syngenetic vs. epigenetic permafrost aggradation). Therefore, the need exists to study permafrost peat C loss following permafrost thaw from a range of peatland environments, including those that aggraded permafrost epigenetically and those from the southern limits of permafrost, where permafrost can persist with MAAT >1.5 °C but is also most vulnerable to thaw (Jones et al., 2016).

This study highlights significant losses from collapse-scar bog systems that were previously thought to not lose much old C (Robinson & Moore, 2000; Turetsky et al., 2000; Jones et al., 2013). It also highlights the utility of the chronosequence approach compared with single-core analyses to measure long-term C dynamics, as the chronosequence approach allows us to better account for C loss from the system. The results of the mass balance model suggest that losses will eventually (several centuries to millennia) recuperate prethaw C stocks through gains in bog peat accumulation, but the absence of the confining permafrost surrounding the collapse-scar bogs as permafrost thaw progresses could result in changes in drainage patterns that could lower accumulation as water and nutrients are redistributed on the landscape, reducing their overall C sink capacity (Jorgenson et al., 2013).

Because the overall amount of C loss from our field sites shows a proportional loss to the age of the site and therefore how much peat had accumulated prior to thaw, an understanding of landscape development history is important for predicting the C dynamics of these lowland landscapes to thaw. While we have determined from our two chronosequences that roughly 30% of forest peat C is lost following thaw, the amount of time it takes for it lose this amount of C remains poorly constrained, and more data are needed to better constrain the loss term of forest peat. In addition, questions remain about how permafrost aggradation processes impact rates of C loss following thaw, as well as about the mechanisms and modes of C loss. Future work should also include well-dated chronosequences in locations where permafrost aggraded epigenetically, as well as sites that have undergone multiple cycles of permafrost aggradation and degradation at locations across the northern permafrost zone to better understand how regional site and climate histories contribute to C dynamics in thawing permafrost peatlands. Because fire is a part of the natural ecology of the boreal forest zone, future models should also account for the impact of fire and peat burning in carbon dynamics as it relates to permafrost thaw.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Innoko NWR and Koyukuk NWR for allowing us to collect samples. The manuscript was significantly improved by two anonymous reviewers and Benjamin Jones. This research was funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Climate and Land Use Research and Development Program. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USA Government.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.