Volume 29, Issue S2 pp. 67-68
Letters, Techniques and Images
Free Access

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for a superficial polyp located at the anastomosis after surgical colectomy

Yoji Takeuchi

Yoji Takeuchi

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yusuke Tonai

Yusuke Tonai

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Keisei Ikeda

Keisei Ikeda

Department of Gastroenterology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Hyogo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 April 2017
Citations: 9

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR), as reported by Binmoeller et al., is an effective technique to remove recurrent lesions after piecemeal EMR, as well as large sessile colorectal polyps.1-3 One major advantage of U-EMR is that submucosal injection is not required as: (i) the suctioning of luminal air decreases colonic wall tension; (ii) colonic muscular wall remains circular when it is filled with water; and (iii) water immersion ‘floats’ the mucosa and submucosa.2 This technique is also applied to duodenal ampullary and non-ampullary adenomas.4, 5

Details are in the caption following the image
Endoscopic images of a superficial colonic polyp located at the anastomosis after sigmoidectomy during the first attempt at conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in a previous hospital. (a) White light image of the lesion. A superficial 10-mm-sized polyp located at the anastomosis after sigmoidectomy. (b) Submucosal injection with normal saline. (c) Polyp image after initial submucosal injection. (d) Non-lifting sign after multiple submucosal injections. Conventional EMR cannot be carried out in this situation.
Details are in the caption following the image
Endoscopic images of a superficial colonic polyp located at the anastomosis after sigmoidectomy during underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) in Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases. (a) White light image of the lesion. A superficial 10-mm-sized polyp located at the anastomosis after sigmoidectomy. (b) Underwater endoscopic image just after removal by U-EMR. Removed specimen can be seen on the left side of the image and the sheath of a closed electrosurgical snare can be seen on the right side of the image. This procedure has been completely carried out under water. (c) Underwater magnified narrow-band image of the mucosal defect just after U-EMR. There is no evidence of residual polyp on the mucosal margin. (d) Pathological findings of the resected specimen. The retrieved specimen showed high-grade dysplasia without tumor involvement on the horizontal and vertical margins.

A 77-year-old man presented with a 10-mm-sized superficial colonic polyp located at the anastomosis site after sigmoidectomy for a sigmoid colon cancer (Fig 1a). The lesion was detected during follow-up colonoscopy after surgery in a previous hospital, and the endoscopist attempted to carry out conventional EMR. After several submucosal injections of normal saline, the lesion was not lifted up, whereas the surrounding mucosa was overly lifted (Fig 1b-d). Therefore, the previous doctor opted not to snare the lesion and recommended additional surgery as the biopsy specimen showed high-grade dysplasia. The patient refused surgery and was referred to Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, where we decided to carry out U-EMR. After full immersion in natural saline, we snared and removed the lesion under narrow-band imaging (NBI) observation (Fig 2a,b).3, 5 The procedure was completed in a few minutes without any visible neoplastic tissue on the margin of the mucosal defect with underwater magnifying NBI observation (Fig 2c). The retrieved specimen showed high-grade dysplasia without tumor involvement on the horizontal and vertical margins (Fig 2d). Surveillance colonoscopy will be carried out in the future.

This case clearly demonstrates the drawbacks of submucosal injection for conventional EMR and the efficacy of U-EMR. U-EMR can be easily carried out for lesions with non-lifting sign during a previous attempt, as well as for recurrent lesion after piecemeal EMR or for large sessile colorectal polyps.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.