Volume 31, Issue S20 p. 102
ABSTRACTS
Free Access

Prosthetic complications with zirconia single-piece implants using different cementation methods

Nino Setten

Nino Setten

Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Martin Koller

Martin Koller

Division of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Manuel Reinisch

Manuel Reinisch

Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Karl Glockner

Karl Glockner

Division of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Norbert Jakse

Norbert Jakse

Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Division of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Payer

Michael Payer

Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 October 2020

7964A ePOSTER BASIC RESEARCH

Background: Dental implants as well as their prosthetic components fabricated out of zirconia have become a widely discussed treatment option within implant dentistry. However, scientific data on their long-term stability so far are scarce.

Aim/Hypothesis: This study aimed to investigate the impact of different cementation methods on the occurrence of prosthetic complications with CAD/CAM-fabricated monolithic lithium-disilicate crowns of incisors after artificial aging.

Materials and Methods: Twenty single-piece zirconia implants of 4 mm diameter and 12 mm in length, were optically scanned and standardised monolithic lithium-disilicate upper left incisor crowns were fabricated. The implants were embedded in acrylic resin in a 135° angle to the horizontal plane. The crowns were then either adhesively (Group A, n = 10) or with a resin modified glass ionomer cement (Group B, n = 10) mounted onto the implants. All specimen underwent a process of artificial aging consisting of thermal stress (3000 cycles between 5°C and 55°C) and mechanical exposure in a chewing simulator (100N, 1.2 × 106 cycles), corresponding to five years of clinical application. Potential prosthetic complications were documented.

Results: The five-year survival rate of all samples was 100%, no cracks, fractures, de-cementations or chippings occurred during the observation period. All specimens in both groups showed grinding facets.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications: In this preclinical study the type of crown fixation did not affect the occurrence of prosthetic complications of monolithic lithium-disilicate crowns mounted on zirconia single-piece implants after artificial ageing of up to five years.

Keywords: zirconia implant, lithium disilicate crown, all ceramic, CAD-CAM, prosthetic complications

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.