Volume 31, Issue S20 p. 272
ABSTRACTS
Free Access

Horizontal bone augmentation using particulate allograft, platelet concentrates and tent screws

Firas Shall

Firas Shall

ULB, Bruxelles, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Laurence Evrard

Laurence Evrard

ULB, Bruxelles, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 October 2020
Citations: 1

3H8O5 ePOSTER CLINICAL RESEARCH – SURGERY

Background: Horizontal bone augmentation may be required previously to implants placement. Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) may be performed, using a mix of particulate allograft (DFDBA 300-500 and 500-1000 μm), platelet concentrates (A-PRF) and tent-screws (1.2 mm diameter) in combination with a tension-free muco-periosteal flap closure technique may be used.

Aim/Hypothesis: To evaluate bone gain obtained with this surgical technique, in order to find out if this technique allows a satisfying bone gain, as compared to other techniques of bone augmentation.

Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical study was conducted. 23 patients were included. Exclusion criteria were: minor patients, pregnant women, smokers, infectious or uncontrolled systemic diseases, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, treatment altering bone quality. A total of 33 grafts were performed. Qualitative variables were collected: location according to the dental arch (maxillary or mandibular), quadrant (1 to 4), extent of the edentation (multiple or 1), type of the edentation (terminal or intercalate), use of a collagen membrane or not. Clinical complications were recorded. Measurements were made on the pre-operative (T0) and the post-operative (T1) scanners. The gain was obtained by calculating the difference between the measures made on T0 and T1. A test of concordance between the two sets of measures was conducted. A Student T-test and a Bartlett test were used to determine the significance of the difference between means and variances. For qualitative variables, a Mann-Whitney test was used.

Results: The correlation coefficient (= 0.690) proved a strong relationship between the two series of measurements. The Student T-test (= 0.91) and the Bartlett test (= 0.59) determined respectively the equality of means and variances between operators. For the 33 grafted sites, mean bone gain was 3.78 ± 1.12 mm. No mucosa dehiscence was observed. Only 1 local infection of the grafted site were observed, which was solved by antibiotherapy. Bone gain was higher when the graft was located on the maxilla (3.79 ± 1.01 mm) compared to the mandible (2.90 ± 1.20 mm). This result was statistically significant (P-value = 0.034). Bone gain was also significantly higher when edentulous sites were intercalated (3.83 ± 0.942 mm) compared to the distal edentulous sites (2.97 ± 1.24 mm), (P-value = 0.047). The analysis of the other variables (quadrant, extent of the edentation, use of a collagen membrane) did not show any statistically significant difference in term of bone gain.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) using a mix of particulate allograft (DFDBA 300-500 and 500-1000 μm), platelet concentrates (A-PRF) and tent-screws (1.2 mm diameter) in combination with a tension-free muco-periosteal flap closure technique is a safe procedure that can achieve a horizontal bone gain of 3.78 ± 1.12 mm on average.

Keywords: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Guided bone regeneration, Particulate allograft, Platelet concentrates, Tent-screws

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.