Volume 31, Issue S20 p. 173
ABSTRACTS
Free Access

The effect of ceramic reinforced polyether-ether- ketone (PEEK) abutments on peri-implant tissues: a randomized controlled clinical trial – preliminary data

Martin Koller

Martin Koller

School of Dentistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander Sprinz

Alexander Sprinz

School of Dentistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Helena Francisco

Helena Francisco

University of Lisbon Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Andre Chen

Andre Chen

University of Lisbon Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Elisabeth Steyer

Elisabeth Steyer

School of Dentistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Kerstin Theisen

Kerstin Theisen

School of Dentistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Alwin Sokolowski

Alwin Sokolowski

School of Dentistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Behrouz Arefnia

Behrouz Arefnia

School of Dentistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Norbert Jakse

Norbert Jakse

School of Dentistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Payer

Michael Payer

School of Dentistry, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 October 2020

7Y9VZ ePOSTER CLINICAL RESEARCH – PERI-IMPLANT BIOLOGY

Background: Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) a semi-crystalline linear polycyclic thermoplastic has been proposed as substitute for metals and ceramics in biomaterials. PEEK has recently also been introduced in implant dentistry as material for superstructures and implant abutments.

Aim/Hypothesis: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare three different abutment materials - customized ceramic reinforced PEEK, titanium and zirconia abutments – and their effect on peri-implant tissue healing over an observation period of 3 years.

Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial 60 patients are treated in three different treatment groups. A block randomization sequence was used to assign the abutments. Twelve weeks after implant insertion (baseline) all implants are restored with screw retained individual CAD/CAM abutments (ceramic reinforced PEEK n = 20, titanium n = 20, zirconia n = 20) and CAD/CAM designed High Impact Polymer Composite (HIPC) crowns. Assessments of bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque INDIAx (PI), probing depths (PD), recessions, technical complications and mean marginal bone levels are recorded after 0, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months.

Results: So far, no significant differences (> 0.05) in any of the evaluated parameters could be detected between the three different treatment groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Thus, it seems ceramic reinforced PEEK maybe a promising alternative material for the fabrication of dental implant abutments evolving comparable clinical short-term results as the standard materials titanium and zirconia. However long-term results are necessary for its final approval.

Acknowledgements: Erika Hafner, Claudia Gregorc

Keywords: Abutment, peri-implant tissue healing, MBL, PEEK

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.