Volume 116, Issue 6 pp. 1482-1499

REVIEW ARTICLE

Open Access

Opportunities to Modulate Tumor Ecosystem Toward Successful Glioblastoma Immunotherapy

Mariko Takahashi,

Corresponding Author

Mariko Takahashi

[email protected]

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Correspondence:

Mariko Takahashi ([email protected])

James J. Moon ([email protected])

Toshiro Hara ([email protected])

Contribution: Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

Darina Mukhamejanova,

Darina Mukhamejanova

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Neurosurgery, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Biology, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan

Contribution: Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

Himani Jasewicz,

Himani Jasewicz

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Contribution: Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

Nandini Acharya,

Nandini Acharya

Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, OSUCCC–James, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Department of Neurology, the Neuroscience Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Contribution: Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

James J. Moon,

Corresponding Author

James J. Moon

[email protected]

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Correspondence:

Mariko Takahashi ([email protected])

James J. Moon ([email protected])

Toshiro Hara ([email protected])

Contribution: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

Toshiro Hara,

Corresponding Author

Toshiro Hara

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-3393

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Neurosurgery, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Correspondence:

Mariko Takahashi ([email protected])

James J. Moon ([email protected])

Toshiro Hara ([email protected])

Contribution: Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author

Mariko Takahashi,

Corresponding Author

Mariko Takahashi

[email protected]

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Correspondence:

Mariko Takahashi ([email protected])

James J. Moon ([email protected])

Toshiro Hara ([email protected])

Contribution: Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

Darina Mukhamejanova,

Darina Mukhamejanova

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Neurosurgery, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Biology, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan

Contribution: Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

Himani Jasewicz,

Himani Jasewicz

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Contribution: Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

Nandini Acharya,

Nandini Acharya

Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, OSUCCC–James, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Department of Neurology, the Neuroscience Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Contribution: Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

James J. Moon,

Corresponding Author

James J. Moon

[email protected]

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Correspondence:

Mariko Takahashi ([email protected])

James J. Moon ([email protected])

Toshiro Hara ([email protected])

Contribution: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author

Toshiro Hara,

Corresponding Author

Toshiro Hara

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-3393

Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Department of Neurosurgery, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Correspondence:

Mariko Takahashi ([email protected])

James J. Moon ([email protected])

Toshiro Hara ([email protected])

Contribution: Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 23 March 2025

https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70052

Funding: This work was supported by Seth M Boyer Foundation. Frankel Innovation Initiative at the University of Michigan. Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan. American Brain Tumor Association. Brain Research Foundation. All of Us Research Program.

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, the failure of multiple clinical trials has confirmed the need for a systematic and comprehensive understanding of glioblastoma (GBM). Current immunotherapies aiming to harness the immune system to achieve anti-tumor effects remain largely ineffective, highlighting the complexities of the GBM microenvironment. However, our recent understanding of immune niches within the central nervous system provides both opportunities and challenges in translating these insights into successful immunotherapy implementation. We discuss these strategies, including targeting multiple antigens within the heterogeneous GBM microenvironment, identifying new druggable targets to abrogate immunosuppression, and understanding niche-specific immune cell functionality to modulate tumor-immune-stroma interactions.

1 Introduction

Tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) represent a diverse entity of malignancies that vary in clinical outcome, therapeutic response, and underlying biology. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification combines phenotypes and genotypes for diagnosis to develop a classification of the tumors with a degree of homogeneity in the survival of each patient pool [1]. Glioblastoma (hereafter GBM), now defined as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild type tumors, is the most aggressive form of primary brain tumor with a disproportionately high mortality [2]. Transcriptome profiling studies have identified transcriptional subtypes in GBM, such as proneural (PN), classical (CL), and mesenchymal (MES), reflecting the developmental constraints and the distinct tumor microenvironment [3]. Subtype transitions in patient tumors suggest that tumor phenotype and therapeutic efficacy may be determined by dynamic tumor-niche interactions [4]. A detailed personalized map of the cellular components and their interactions is required to understand common therapeutic failures and improve GBM treatment outcomes.

Cancer immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative treatment modality, based on the concept that the immune system targets tumor cells by recognizing tumor-specific characteristics. The remarkable success of immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICBT), which entails the use of monoclonal antibodies to block intercellular signaling (e.g., anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4)), has repelled skepticism toward cancer immunotherapy among clinical oncologists. Another breakthrough, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, encourages the development of advanced cell engineering strategies. These advancements have been actively integrated into clinical trials across the nations, as of December 26, 2024 (Tables 1 and 2). However, initial immunotherapy trials for GBM seem abortive in producing consistent signs of clinical benefits observed in other cancers [5]. This contrast prompts us to reconsider the mechanism and the impact of immune-tumor and -niche interactions in a spatiotemporal manner.

TABLE 1. Recruitment-active clinical trials for GBM immunotherapy.

Modality	Immunological target	Trial ID	Trial name	Phase	No. of Patients	Tumor description	Registration Date	Status
Combination therapy
Antibody (Pembrolizumab) & tumor treating fields	PD-1	NCT06556563	EF-41/KEYNOTE D58: Phase 3 Study of Optune Concomitant With Temozolomide Plus Pembrolizumab in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	Phase III	741	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	2024–12	Recruiting
Immunotoxin (D2C7-IT) & antibody (2141-V11)	CD40, Immunotoxin	NCT06455605	D2C7-IT +2141-V11 Combination Post-resection in rGBM	Phase I	46	Recurrent Glioblastoma	2024–11	Not yet recruiting
Autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes & antibody (Pembrolizumab)	TILs, PD1	NCT06640582	TIL Therapy Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Brain Cancer Including Gliomas and Meningiomas	Phase I/II	85	Brain Tumors (Brain Metastases, Gliomas, Glioblastoma, Meningioma)	2024–10	Recruiting
CMV-specific T cells & pembrolizumab	PD-1, Tumor Virus Antigen	NCT06157541	T Cells and Pembrolizumab for Recurrent and Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	Phase I/II	58	Glioblastoma	2024–02	Recruiting
Ultrasound (Sonocloud-9) & antibody (Balstilimab)	BBB, CTLA-4, PD-1	NCT05864534	Phase 2a Immune Modulation With Ultrasound for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	Phase III	25	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	2024–01	Recruiting
Immunotoxin (D2C7-IT) & antibody (2141-V11)	CD40, Immunotoxin	NCT05734560	D2C7-IT and 2141-V11 in Newly Diagnosed GBM Patients	Phase I/II	50	Newly Diagnosed MGMT Unmethylated Glioblastoma	2023–09	Recruiting
Antibody (Crizanlizumab, Nivolumab)	P-selectin, PD1	NCT05909618	Crizanlizumab Alone or in Combination With Nivolumab for Glioblastoma and Melanoma With Brain Metastases	Phase II	33	Glioblastoma, Metastatic Melanoma in the Central Nervous System	2023–07	Recruiting
Immune checkpoint blockade
Antibody (Ipilimumab, Nivolumab)	CTLA-4, PD1	NCT06097975	A Clinical Trial on Combined (Neo-)Adjuvant Intravenous Plus Intracranial Administration of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Recurrent Glioblastoma	Phase I	18	Recurrent Glioblastoma	2024–01	Not yet recruiting
Antibody (Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab)	CTLA-4, PD1	NCT06047379	Safety and Efficacy of NEO212 in Patients with Astrocytoma IDH-mutant, Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype or Brain Metastasis	Phase I/II	134	Diffuse Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant Gliomas, IDH-wt glioblastoma, Brain Metastases, other solid cancers	2023–11	Recruiting
Antibody (Pembrolizumab)	PD-1	NCT05235737	The Assessment of Immune Response in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Treated With Pembrolizumab	Phase IV	36	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	2022–03	Recruiting
Antibody (Pembrolizumab)	PD-1	NCT04977375	Trial of Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Radiation in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma	Phase I/II	10	Glioblastoma	2021–12	Recruiting
Antibody (AB154, AB122)	TIGIT, PD-1	NCT04656535	AB154 Combined with AB122 for Recurrent Glioblastoma	Early Phase I	46	Glioblastoma	2021–04	Recruiting
Cell therapy
CAR T cell	EGFRvIII, EphA2/IL-13Ralpha2, synNotch system	NCT06186401	Anti-EGFRvIII synNotch Receptor Induced Anti-EphA2/IL-13Ralpha2 CAR (E-SYNC) T Cells	Phase I	20	EGFR mutated Glioblastoma	2024–09	Recruiting
Engineered NK cell	PD-L1, IL15 superagonist	NCT06061809	N-803 and PD-L1 t-haNK Combined With Bevacizumab for Recurrent or Progressive Glioblastoma	Phase II	20	Glioblastoma	2024–08	Recruiting
Neoantigen-specific T cell	Tumor Antigens	NCT05685004	Study of Neoantigen-specific Adoptive T Cell Therapy for Newly Diagnosed MGMT Negative Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)	Phase II/III	120	Glioblastoma	2023–09	Recruiting
Tris-CAR-T cell	CD44, CD133, truncated IL7Ra system	NCT05577091	Tris-CAR-T Cell Therapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma	Phase I	10	Recurrent Glioblastoma	2023–09	Recruiting
CAR T cell	CD70, IL-8 Receptor	NCT05353530	Phase I Study of IL-8 Receptor-modified CD70 CAR T Cell Therapy in CD70+ Adult Glioblastoma (IMPACT)	Phase I	18	Glioblastoma	2023–07	Recruiting
CAR T cell	EGFRvIII, EGFR, T-cell–engaging antibody molecules	NCT05660369	CARv3-TEAM-E T Cells in Glioblastoma	Phase I	21	Glioblastoma	2023–03	Recruiting
Dendritic cell	Tumor Stem Cell Antigens	NCT03548571	Dendritic Cell Immunotherapy Against Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Patients Receiving Standard Therapy	Phase II/III	60	Glioblastoma	2018–04	Recruiting
Dendritic cell	Tumor Antigens	NCT04801147	Immunotherapy With Autologous Tumor Lysate-Loaded Dendritic Cells In Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme	Phase I/II	76	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	2010–06	Recruiting
Virus therapy
Oncolytic virus (G207)	Engineered herpes simplex virus (HSV)	NCT04482933	HSV G207 with a Single Radiation Dose in Children with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma	Phase II	35	Malignant Gliomas (including Glioblastoma)	2024–12	Recruiting
Oncolytic virus (rQNestin34.5v.2)	Engineered herpes simplex virus (HSV)	NCT03152318	A Study of the Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Glioma With rQNestin34.5v.2	Phase I	62	Malignant Gliomas (including Glioblastoma)	2017–07	Recruiting
Vaccines
RNA-Lipid Particle (RNA-LP) Vaccines	pp65 mRNA, tumor RNA	NCT06389591	RNA-Lipid Particle (RNA-LP) Vaccines for Recurrent Adult Glioblastoma (GBM)	Phase I	24	Recurrent Glioblastoma	2024–10	Recruiting
PEP-CMV vaccine	CMV antigens	NCT06132438	Immunotherapy Targeting of Cytomegalovirus Antigens in Glioblastoma	Phase I	26	Glioblastoma	2023–11	Not yet recruiting
RNA-lipid Particle (RNA-LP) Vaccines	pp65 mRNA, tumor RNA	NCT04573140	A Study of RNA-lipid Particle (RNA-LP) Vaccines for Newly Diagnosed Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas (pHGG) and Adult Glioblastoma (GBM)	Phase I/II	52	Newly Diagnosed Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas and Adult Glioblastoma	2021–10	Recruiting
VBI-1901 vaccine	CMV antigens	NCT03382977	Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Optimal Dose of Candidate GBM Vaccine VBI-1901 in Recurrent GBM Subjects	Phase I/II	98	Recurrent Glioblastoma	2017–12	Recruiting
Small molecules/cytokine
Inhibitor (Indoximod)	Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)	NCT05106296	Chemo-immunotherapy Using Ibrutinib Plus Indoximod for Patients With Pediatric Brain Cancer	Phase I	37	Ependymoma, Medulloblastoma, Glioblastoma, Primary Brain Tumor	2022–02	Recruiting

Note: Trials identified from ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov) with filtering: Condition/ disease; glioblastoma, Other term; GBM, Intervention/treatment; immunotherapy, Study Status; Recruiting, Not-yet-recruiting studies, Study type; Interventional. This search, as of December 26th, 2024, led to 36 studies, nine of which were excluded from this table because these studies are observational or not for immunotherapy.

TABLE 2. Registered clinical trials for GBM immunotherapy in the European Union (EU) and Japan.

Modality	Immunological Target	Trial ID	Trial Name	Phase	No. of Patients	Tumor Description	Country	Registration Date	Status
Combination therapy
Antibody (Nivolumab, Ipilimumab) & DC	PD-1, CTLA-4, Tumor antigens	2024–517,842–33-01	Phase I clinical trial on intra-tumoral ipilimumab plus intravenous nivolumab following the resection of recurrent glioblastoma	Phase I/II	113	Glioblastoma	Belgium	2024–11	Not yet recruiting
Antibody (Pembrolizumab) & tumor treating fields	PD-1	jRCT2011240045	EF-41/KEYNOTE-D58Trial	Phase III	741	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	Japan, USA, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Spain, Poland, Italy, Israel, Germany, France, Czech, Canada	2024–10	Recruiting
Antibody (Nivolumab) & multi-kinase Inhibitor (Regorafenib)	PD-1	jRCT2031200408	A Trial to Learn Whether Regorafenib in Combination With Nivolumab Can Improve Tumor Responses and How Safe it is for Participants With Solid Tumors	Phase II	200	Solid Tumors (including Glioblastoma)	Belgium, France, Japan, Korea, Italy, United Kingdom, USA	2021–03	Complete
Antibody (Ezabenlimab) & bispecific nanobody (BI 836880)	PD-1, VEGF, Ang2	jRCT2031200207	A study to test different doses of BI 836880 combined with ezabenlimab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer followed by other types of advanced solid tumors	Phase I	6	Advanced Solid Tumors (including Glioblastoma)	Japan, Australia, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, Poland, Russian, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA	2020–11	Complete
Peptide vaccine (EO2401) & Antibody (Nivolumab)	Microbiome-derived bacterial antigens, PD-1	2018–002279-16	A Multicenter, Open-Label, First-in-Human, Phase Ib/IIa Trial of EO2401, a Novel Multipeptide Therapeutic Vaccine, with and without PD-1 Check Point Inhibitor, Following Standard Treatment in PatIents with Progressive Glioblastoma (Rosalie study)	Phase Ib/IIa	100	Glioblastoma	USA, France, Spain, Germany	2019–08	Complete
Bacterial vaccine vector (VXM01) & Antibody (Avelumab)	PD-L1, VEGFR2	2017–003076-31	An open-label, Phase I/II multicenter clinical trial of VXM01 in combination with avelumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma following standard treatment with or without second surgery.	Phase I/II	100	Glioblastoma	Germany, Netherlands	2018–04	Ongoing
Immune checkpoint blockade
Inhibitor (ABBV-181)	PD-1	jRCT2031230510	A Phase 1 study of ABBV-706 alone or in combination in adult subjects with advanced solid tumors	Phase I	350	Advanced Solid Tumors with Potential SEZ6 Expression (including IDH-wt Glioblastoma)	Japan, USA, Israel, Korea	2023–12	Recruiting
Antibdoy (Pembrolizumab)	PD-1	2020–006143-26/2024–517,535–52-00	A Single center, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant Pembrolizumab on top of standard Chemo-Radiotherapy (Stupp protocol) in Treatment of Patients with newly diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme	Phase IV	36	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	Poland	2021–02	Recruiting
Antibody (Durvalumab/Medi4736)	PD-L1	2016–001614-16/2024–515,000–39-00	A phase I/II multicenter trial evaluating the association of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy and the anti-PD-L1 Durvalumab (Medi4736) for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.	phase I/II	106	Recurrent Glioblastoma	France	2016–10	Complete
Antibody (Nivolumab/BMS-936558)	PD-1	jRCT2080223128	A Phase 3 Study of ONO-4538/BMS-936558 (ONO-4538-40/CA209548)	Phase III	693	Glioblastoma	Japan, North America, Europe, Oceania, Middle East	2016–03	Complete
Cell therapy
Dendritic cells	Tumor antigens	jRCTc031230593	A safety study of combined immunotherapy for glioblastoma	Phase I	3	Glioblastoma	Japan	2024–10	Not yet recruiting
Dendritic cells (DEN-STEM)	Tumor antigens	2015–002198-40/2024–518,663–35-00	Open label randomized phase II/III trial of dendritic cell immunotherapy against cancer stem cells in glioblastoma patients receiving standard therapy (DEN-STEM)	Phase II/III	60	Glioblastoma multiforme	Norway	2016–09	Recruiting
Dendritic cells (ICT-107)	Tumor antigens	2015–002685-23	A Phase III randomized double-blind, controlled study of ICT-107 with maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma following resection and concomitant TMZ chemoradiotherapy.	Phase III	414	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, UK, USA	2016–04	Ongoing
Dendritic cells (WT1 mRNA-electroporated)	Tumor antigens	2014–001098-15/2024–515,291–13-00	Adjuvant dendritic-cell immunotherapy plus temozolomide following surgery and chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma	Phase II	20	newly diagnosed glioblastoma	Belgium	2015–07	Ongoing
Lympohid cells (ALECSAT)	Lymphoid Effector Cells	2013–003045-42/ NCT02060955	An Open-labeled, Randomized Phase II Multicentre Study to Investigate Efficacy of Autologous Lymphoid Effector Cells Specific Against Tumor-Cells (ALECSAT) in Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme Measured as Progression Free Survival Compared to Avastin/Irinotecan	Phase II	175	Glioblastoma multiforme	Denmark	2013–10	Complete
Dendritic cells	Tumor antigens	2010–018447-34	Investigation of dendritic cell vaccine immunotherapy in pediatric high grade glioma	Phase I	20	Malignant glioma	UK	2011–08	Ended
Dendritic cells (DCm-HGG-L)	Tumor antigens	2009–018228-14	HGG-2010. AS phase IIb prospective placebo-controlled double blind randomized clinical trial for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme with tumor vaccination as “add-on therapy” to standard primary treatment	Phase II	146	Glioblastoma multiforme	Belgium	2011–04	Complete
Virus therapy
Oncolytic virus (G47delta)	Engineered herpes simplex virus (HSV)	UMIN000015995	A phase 2 clinical trial of a replication-competent, recombinant herpes simplex virus type 1 in patients with glioblastoma	Phase II	30	Residual or Recurrent Glioblastoma	Japan	2014–12	Complete: follow-up complete
Oncolytic virus (G47delta)	Engineered herpes simplex virus (HSV)	UMIN000002661	A clinical study of a replication-competent, recombinant herpes simplex virus type 1 (G47delta) in patients with progressive glioblastoma	Phase I/II	21	Recurrent Glioblastoma	Japan	2009–10	Complete: follow-up complete
Vaccines
Tumor vaccine (Cellm-001)	Tumor Antigens	jRCT2031200153	Randomized phase III clinical trial on the therapeutic effect of Cellm-001 for newly diagnosed glioblastoma	Phase III	112	Glioblastoma	Japan	2020–10	Recruiting
WT1 peptides	Tumor antigens	UMIN000026965	Phase II clinical trial of WT1 peptide-based vaccine combined with Temozoromide for patients with glioblastoma	Phase II	35	Glioblastoma	Japan	2017–09	Complete: follow-up complete
Wt1 peptide (DSP-7888)	Tumor Antigens	jRCT2080223161	A phase 1/2 study of DSP-7888 in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory high grade gliomas	Phase I/II	30	Pediatric High Grade Gliomas	Japan	2016–05	Complete
Autologous tumor vaccine	Tumor antigens	UMIN000010602	Randomized phase IIb/III trial of autologous tumor vaccine with temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma	Phase IIb/III	60	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	Japan	2013–04	Complete: follow-up complete
Peptide vaccine (ITK-1)	Antigens	UMIN000006970	A placebo controlled phase III double blind study of ITK-1-The efficacy and safety evaluation of ITK-1 in Temozolomide refractory Glioblastoma patients with HLA-A24 positive	Phase III	110	Glioblastoma	Japan	2012–01	Complete: follow-up complete
Peptide vaccine (ITK-1)	Antigens	jRCT2080221684	ITK-1 Phase 3 placebo controlled double-blind comparative study	Phase III	110	Glioblastoma	Japan	2011–12	Complete
Peptide vaccine	VEGFR-1/2	UMIN000005545	A phase I/II study for peptide vaccine of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/2 in patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma	phase I/II	20	Glioblastoma	Japan	2011–05	Complete: follow-up complete
WT1 peptide	Tumor antigens	UMIN000002419	Immunotherapy using WT1 peptide with surgical treatment, irradiation therapy, and Temozolomide administration against glioblastoma multiforme: A phase I/II study	phase I/II	45	Glioblastoma Multiforme	Japan	2009–09	Recruiting
WT1 peptide	Tumor antigens	UMIN000002024	Immunotherapy using WT1 peptide against recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: A phase I/II study	phase I/II	30	Glioblastoma Multiforme	Japan	2009–06	Complete: follow-up complete
Autologous tumor vaccine	Tumor antigens	UMIN000001426	Phase I/IIa trial of autologous tumor vaccine and temozolomide administration in patients with primary glioblastoma	Phase I/IIa	25	Glioblastoma	Japan	2008–11	Complete: follow-up complete
Peptide vaccination	Tumor antigens	UMIN000001243	Phase II clinical trial of personalized peptide vaccination for standard therapy failure patients with malignant glioma (glioblastoma)	Phase II	40	Malignant Glioma (Glioblastoma)	Japan	2008–07	Complete: follow-up complete
Autologous tumor vaccination	Tumor Antigens	C000000002	Phase I/IIa trial of autologous tumor vaccination in patients with primary glioblastoma	Phase I/IIa	25	Glioblastoma	Japan	2005–08	Complete: follow-up complete
Small molecules/cytokine
IFN beta	Cytokine	UMIN000010472	Phase II trial of polifeprosan 20 with carmustine implant, Interferon-beta and Temozolomide Combination Chemoradiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastomas	Phase II	60	Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma	Japan	2013–04	Recruiting
IFN beta	Cytokine	UMIN000003466	A Multicenter Randomized Phase II trial of Interferon-beta and Temozolomide Combination Chemoradiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastomas(JCOG0911, INTEGRA study (P-II))	Phase II	120	Glioblastoma	Japan	2010–04	Complete: follow-up continuing

Note: Trials were identified from 1. rctportal (https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en) with filtering: Glioblastoma and manual filtration for interventional immunotherapy that led to 22 studies, 2. EU Clinical Trials (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search, https://euclinicaltrials.eu/?lang=en) with search filtration of “Glioblastoma AND Immunotherapy” or terms: Immunotherapy and condition: Glioblastoma. The data were retrieved on December 26, 2024.

We herein review the current immunotherapy strategies from two perspectives: (1) modulating immune functions and tumor immunogenicity, and (2) targeting brain immune niches. The CNS was historically considered immune privileged due to the blood–brain barrier (BBB) that prevents peripheral immune cell entry into the CNS. However, growing evidence demonstrates that resident and infiltrating innate and adaptive immune cells contribute to normal brain function and tissue repair, whose dysregulation is implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, neuroinflammation, and tumors. Furthermore, recent studies have identified several specialized immunological niches surrounding the brain parenchyma, mediating dynamic interplays between the peripheral immune system and the CNS [6]. This review summarizes the current knowledge in GBM immunotherapy and discusses the potential of underappreciated immune niches to harness anti-tumor immune responses against GBM.

1.1 Modulating Immune Functions and Tumor Immunogenicity

Successful immunotherapy depends on tumor antigen recognition and immune potency (Figure 1). The former has been exploited by synthetic bioengineering and immune education with tumor-derived antigens. ICB and immunomodulatory ligands rejuvenate and activate immune cells to achieve robust anti-tumor immunity. These strategies show synergy when rationally combined; yet further optimization and therapeutic target identification are required.

Details are in the caption following the image — **FIGURE 1**
Open in figure viewer PowerPoint

Approaches to target immune cells in human GBM. The current landscape of representative GBM immunotherapies to transform immunosuppressive microenvironment by activating innate and adaptive immune cells. Key GBM immunotherapeutic approaches include Immune checkpoint blockade, Engineered cell therapy, Vaccines, Small molecules, Cytokines, and Oncolytic viruses, which are coupled with a Drug Delivery System facilitated by ultrasound.

1.2 Immune Checkpoint Blockade

The ICBT primarily targets anti-tumor T cells to restore their functions by blocking T cell inhibitory molecules [7]. Local T cell abundance is the key determinant of ICBT efficacy [7], but transcriptomic studies characterized the immune landscape of GBM as “non-T cell-inflamed” and “macrophage-enriched” [8, 9]. The limited presence and functional exhaustion of T cells—a chronically activated yet hypo-functional state—partly driven by the high abundance of immunosuppressive myeloid cells, may contribute to the poor outcomes observed in clinical trials [10]. The immune-cold microenvironment may be associated with tumor subtypes, as researchers identified higher infiltration of exhausted T cells in MES-enriched tumors [11]. In mouse models of MES-like GBM, tumors exhibited sensitivity to CTLA-4 blockade but not to PD-1 inhibition. This response was associated with enhanced interactions between IFNγ-producing CD4+ T cells and MHC-II+ microglia, ultimately leading to tumor clearance [12]. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA) of human MES-GBM revealed heterogeneous MHC and inflammatory profiles of tumor cells caused by interactions with Oncostatin M (OSM)-expressing macrophages (Figure 2) [11]. Therefore, approaches for effective ICBT may include the development of a personalized strategy for MES-GBM patients based on specific genetic biomarkers, such as germline POLE mutations and FcγR polymorphism [13]. Other immune checkpoint molecules have been explored, such as CD161, whose blockade induces NK cell-like state activation in T cells [14], and CD47-SIRPα axis to restore myeloid phagocytosis activity [15]. The antibodies targeting these molecules are still in the early stages of therapeutic validation, potentially promising as a combination therapy [16].

1.3 Engineered Cell Therapy

CAR-T cells are made by engineering patients' autologous peripheral T cells to express receptors that recognize tumor antigens [17], but the major limitations include exhaustion and resistance due to antigen heterogeneity that drives immune evasion. Indeed, CAR-T cells targeting single GBM antigens (e.g., EGFRvIII, HER2, IL13Rα) have not reached large-scale trials [18]. Two ongoing clinical trials targeting multiple antigens show promising effects in eradicating GBM (Table 1; NCT05660369, NCT06186401) [19, 20]. Choi et al. designed EGFRvIII-CAR-T cells that secrete a bispecific antibody bridging wild-type EGFR on GBM and CD3 on T cells [19]. Bagley et al. developed bivalent CAR-T cells that recognize both EGFR and IL13Rα [20]. A dual targeting approach is also investigated in CAR-NK cells [21], and GD2-CAR-NK cells [22] or CAR-NKT cells [23] in brain tumors are under investigation. Preclinical studies demonstrated that engineered macrophages expressing CD133-CAR [24] or secreting bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) [25] exhibit great potency in tumor phagocytosis in combination with CD47 blockade [24]. Beyond CAR, engineered macrophages [26], neutrophils [27], and bacteria [28] are utilized as drug-delivery tools when coupled with drug-loaded polymeric backpacks/nanoparticles and multilayered polymeric particles [29]. Advanced synthetic biology will greatly contribute to overcoming tumor heterogeneity and achieving spatiotemporal regulation of engineered cells by controllable molecular switches [30, 31].

1.4 Vaccines

Vaccines educate the host immune system, particularly dendritic cells (DCs), to induce a tumor-specific T-cell response [32]. Multi-peptide vaccines targeting GBM tumor-specific or tumor-associated antigens, such as rindopepimut (EGFRvIII) and SurVax (survivin), are being tested, and several early-phase trials have shown favorable results [32]. A therapeutic vaccine, DCVax-L, which uses autologous tumor lysates to activate DCs for intradermal injection, demonstrated significant improvement in median survival in phase III clinical trials [32]. Human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) pp65 antigen-mRNA loaded DC vaccines also showed promising effects in boosting CD8⁺ T cell responses in GBM [32]. A recent study achieved the dramatic delivery efficacy of mRNA-containing lipid particle aggregates (RNA-LPA), which rapidly reprogrammed the TME to the “immune-hot” state by activating the RNA sensing pathway in the stroma [33].

1.5 Small Molecules/Drug Delivery System/Oncolytic Virus

Small-molecule drugs have continuously faced challenges in GBM therapy since the approval of temozolomide [2] due to their inability to penetrate the BBB and limited druggable GBM oncogenic drivers. To enhance BBB permeability, nanomaterials for small molecule delivery such as sHDL Nanodisc [34] and nanoparticles encapsulated with the innate immune agonist CpG or nanohydrogel show advantages in activating tumor-associated macrophages and suppressing immune evasion [35]. Non-invasive treatments, Sonodynamic therapy (SDT), Photodynamic therapy (PDT), and magnetic resonance focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), deliver high-intensity ultrasound waves to precisely target tumor tissue with certain sensitizers and physically disrupt the BBB to enhance payload delivery [36, 37]. Traditional chemotherapeutic drugs induce tumor cell death associated with enhanced tumor immunogenicity [38], but the low mutational burden in GBM limits the diversity of molecular target drugs. Our chemical proteomics platform identified previously unrecognized druggable protein targets in 25 cancer types including GBM [39], which may tailor the heterogeneity of GBM cell states reactive to currently available immunotherapies through transcriptional reprogramming. Researchers also focus on CCR2, CSF1R, and CHIL3L1 [40] inhibitors to block immunosuppressive macrophage infiltration and skew phenotypic polarization toward anti-tumoral states. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have attracted considerable interest for the potency of immunogenic cell death (ICD) induction, even while still facing some obstacles, including host-mediated virus clearance [41]. OVs selectively replicate in tumor cells by their functional deletion of the neurovirulence factors and induce oncolysis [41, 42], leading to extracellular release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as ATP and HMGB1 (Figure 2), showing synergistic effects with ICBT [43, 44].

1.6 Cytokine/Chemokine Therapy

Cytokine and chemokine therapy aims to remodel the immunosuppressive TME landscape and increase immunogenicity [45]. For pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12, TNFα, and IFNα, various delivery strategies have been developed to control the dose, localization, and toxicity of these soluble factors, including targeted oncolytic viruses [46], lipid nanoparticles [47], and CAR engineering [17]. Administration of the cytokine-conjugated antibody L19-IL-12 and L19-TNFα, which binds to extracellular domain B (ED-B) of fibronectin expressed in tumors, improved overall survival in orthotropic GBM mouse models [48]. A recent clinical trial reported that recombinant IFNα administration enhanced the efficacy of temozolomide and prolonged patient survival. Engineered immunotoxin MDNA55, which consists of circularly permuted IL-4 fused to a truncated Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A, was shown to induce cell death of IL-4R-high populations, including GBM tumor cells and immunosuppressive macrophages [49]. With an acceptable safety profile and a 50% increase in median overall survival seen in the phase IIb trial, MDNA55 was granted Fast Track and Orphan Drug Status, allowing it to move into a phase III trial. Further development requires rational combination strategies.

2 Targeting Brain Immune Niches

Adaptive and innate immune cells interact with the non-immune cells in the CNS microenvironment—neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes—to construct distinct immunological niches that tightly regulate brain homeostasis and function [6]. Choroid plexus, meninges, and perivascular niche, as well as skull bone marrow serve as a reservoir necessary for immune homeostasis and allow reparative leukocyte infiltration from the periphery into the brain parenchyma following CNS damage. A groundbreaking discovery of the meningeal lymphatic system [50] has transformed our perception of immune cell trafficking from the CNS to the meningeal borders and the draining cervical lymph nodes. The impact of immunological niche dysregulation on CNS pathologies has been studied mainly in acute CNS injury, neurodegenerative diseases [51], and infectious diseases, including COVID-19 [52]. Although studies characterizing GBM immune niches are still immature, the lessons learned from other brain diseases may provide unique GBM therapeutic interventions targeting immune niches (Figure 3).

2.1 Choroid Plexus (CP)

The CP consists of specialized epithelial cells surrounded by vascularized stroma, located in the brain ventricles, and functions to produce cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CSF protects the brain and spinal cord from mechanical trauma, provides nutrients to the CNS, and regulates metabolite homeostasis. CSF follows a multi-route circulation [53] that includes the cribriform plate, lymphatic vessels, olfactory nerves, as well as meningeal and perivascular routes, ultimately reaching the cervical lymph nodes. The Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier (BCSFB) is a physiological gateway for immune cells into the CNS. Multiple CP resident immune cells, mainly DCs, macrophages (known as Kolmer's epiplexus cells), and effector memory CD4⁺T cells, orchestrate to regulate immune homeostasis [54]. Ligand-receptor interactions, such as CCR6-CCL20 [55] or IFNγ-IFNGR [56] between immune cells and CP epithelium induce pathogenic T cell infiltration, and IL-1β [57] and type I IFN [58]. Targeting CP epithelium [59] and CSF [60] might improve drug sensitivity and recruit a specific immune cell population into the GBM microenvironment.

2.2 Meninges

The meninges is membranous connective tissue consisting of four layers: the pia mater, the subarachnoid lymphatic-like membrane (SLYM) [61], the arachnoid mater, and the dura mater (from inner to outer). Each layer has distinct roles in immune homeostasis and inflammatory responses [6], showing unique enrichment of immune cell subsets [62]. Although controversial, anatomical analyses revealed the morphological and functional differences between dorsal meningeal lymphatic vessels (MLVs) and basal MLVs on drainage of CSF-derived macromolecules, immune trafficking [63, 64], and glioma antigen delivery [63, 65]. VEGF-C regulates lymphatic angiogenesis and vascular remodeling [63], and several studies demonstrated that the ectopic expression of VEGF-C enhanced CD8⁺ T cell migration into glioma tissue through lymphatic drainage [66] and increased ICBT and radiation therapy efficacy [63, 67]. Collectively, utilizing MLV for targeted delivery of immune-stimulating agents and vascular reprogramming might enhance the therapeutic effects of biologics and non-invasive treatment.

2.3 Perivascular Niche (PVN)

The PVN stroma cells function as the critical regulators of glioma stemness, invasion, and therapeutic resistance [68]. The PV endothelium maintains glioma stem-like cell (GSC) properties and induces immunosuppressive macrophages [69]. High abundance of these GSC-derived pericytes is associated with better chemotherapy efficacy [70, 71]. Oligodendrocyte progenitor cell-like GBM tumor cells actively invade into peritumoral brain parenchyma along with PVN through the Olig2-Wnt7 pathway [72], contributing to therapeutic failure. Interestingly, neuron-to-glioma synapses drive glioma progression and neuronal excitability [73, 74] and astrocytes show unique accumulation in the peritumor region away from myeloid cells [75], exacerbating tumorigenesis by mitochondria transfer [76]. PV macrophages show heterogeneity, including yolk sac-derived resident Lyve1⁺F4/80⁺CD206⁺CXCR3⁺ macrophages [6] and several monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) that increase along GBM progression. CD169⁺ MDMs promote phagocytosis and T cell recruiting [77], whereas GLUT1⁺ MDMs produce anti-inflammatory IL-10 and suppress T cell activation [78]. Mechanisms of this heterogeneous macrophage differentiation and clinical relevance with spatial analysis [79] need further investigation. Reprogramming macrophages into immune-activating phenotype and discovering new immune checkpoint blockade targeting tumor-stroma-immune interactions might provide therapeutic benefits.

2.4 Cervical Lymph Nodes (CLNs)

The CLNs continuously receive brain-derived molecules and antigens from the CNS via CSF and interstitial fluid (ISF). The drainage of meningeal antigen-presenting cells to the CLNs induces activation and circulation of T cells and B cells to the CP and the meninges [6]. Lymph node resection has historically been considered a diagnostic and therapeutic strategy to assess and avoid solid tumor metastases, respectively [80]. However, emerging evidence suggests that intact CLNs are critical for the successful immunotherapy of solid cancers [81]. Although rare, there are several clinical cases reporting GBM extraneural metastases to CLNs [82]. Considering the drainage by meningeal lymphatics, these metastases might be the result of dysfunctional meninges, potentially dorsal MLVs [63]. Further basic and clinical investigations are required to reveal how these metastases occur under certain conditions and why they are relatively rare.

2.5 Skull Bone Marrow (BM)

Skull BM displays a myeloid-rich signature, mainly monocytes and neutrophils [83, 84]. The ScRNA-seq approach identified “hybrid” neutrophils (TANs) harboring antigen presentation capacity, which arise from skull BM and accumulate in GBM [85]. These TANs induce MHC-II-dependent T cell activation and suppress glioma growth in syngeneic GBM models. Interestingly, the accumulation of GD2-CAR-T cells in skull BM of pediatric glioma patients was observed [86]. Another study reported the enrichment of effector CD8⁺ memory T cells in skull BM proximal to tumors but not in distal BM [87]. These findings suggest the potential of engineering skull BM resident myeloid cells to redirect anti-tumor T cells, with advanced imaging techniques [88].

3 Concluding Remarks

The following challenges need to be considered for successful GBM immunotherapies: (1) targeting multiple GBM antigens and tumor heterogeneity, (2) identifying new druggable targets that contribute to the development of an immunosuppressive microenvironment, (3) understanding niche-specific immune cell functions and developing strategies to modulate tumor-immune-stroma interactions, (4) advanced disease models recapitulating human GBM biology to enable rationale combinations to address the challenges mentioned above. In addition, detailed spatial analysis of inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity with specific treatment history will improve our understanding of GBM biology and expedite the creation of potent strategies.

Author Contributions

Mariko Takahashi: conceptualization, supervision, visualization, writing – original draft. Darina Mukhamejanova: visualization, writing – original draft. Himani Jasewicz: visualization, writing – original draft. Nandini Acharya: visualization, writing – original draft. James J. Moon: conceptualization, visualization, writing – original draft. Toshiro Hara: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Consent

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

J.J.M. declares financial interests as board membership, a paid consultant, research funding, and/or equity holder in EVOQ Therapeutics and Saros Therapeutics. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1D. N. Louis, A. Perry, P. Wesseling, et al., “The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary,” Neuro-Oncology 23, no. 8 (2021): 1231–1251, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
10.1093/neuonc/noab106
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2R. Stupp, W. P. Mason, M. J. van den Bent, et al., “Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 352 (2005): 987–996.
10.1056/NEJMoa043330
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3Q. Wang, B. Hu, X. Hu, et al., “Tumor Evolution of Glioma-Intrinsic Gene Expression Subtypes Associates With Immunological Changes in the Microenvironment,” Cancer Cell 32 (2017): 42–56.
10.1016/j.ccell.2017.06.003
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4C. B. Crivii, A. B. Boșca, C. S. Melincovici, et al., “Glioblastoma Microenvironment and Cellular Interactions,” Cancers (Basel) 14 (2022): 1092.
10.3390/cancers14041092
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5M. Lim, Y. Xia, C. Bettegowda, and M. Weller, “Current State of Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 15 (2018): 422–442.
10.1038/s41571-018-0003-5
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6G. Castellani, T. Croese, J. M. Peralta Ramos, and M. Schwartz, “Transforming the Understanding of Brain Immunity,” Science 380 (2023): eabo7649.
10.1126/science.abo7649
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7S. Bagchi, R. Yuan, and E. G. Engleman, “Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer: Clinical Impact and Mechanisms of Response and Resistance,” Annual Review of Pathology 16 (2021): 223–249.
10.1146/annurev-pathol-042020-042741
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8A. Zaitsev, M. Chelushkin, D. Dyikanov, et al., “Precise Reconstruction of the TME Using Bulk RNA-Seq and a Machine Learning Algorithm Trained on Artificial Transcriptomes,” Cancer Cell 40 (2022): 879–894.
10.1016/j.ccell.2022.07.006
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9A. T. Yeo, S. Rawal, B. Delcuze, et al., “Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Evolution of Immune Landscape During Glioblastoma Progression,” Nature Immunology 23, no. 6 (2022): 971–984, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-022-01215-0.
10.1038/s41590-022-01215-0
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10D. A. Reardon, A. A. Brandes, A. Omuro, et al., “Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA Oncology 6, no. 7 (2020): 1003–1010, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1024.
10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1024
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11T. Hara, R. Chanoch-Myers, N. D. Mathewson, et al., “Interactions Between cancer Cells and Immune Cells Drive Transitions to Mesenchymal-Like States in Glioblastoma,” Cancer Cell 39 (2021): 779–792.
10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.002
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12D. Chen, S. K. Varanasi, T. Hara, et al., “CTLA-4 Blockade Induces a Microglia-Th1 Cell Partnership That Stimulates Microglia Phagocytosis and Anti-Tumor Function in Glioblastoma,” Immunity 56 (2023): 2086–2104.
10.1016/j.immuni.2023.07.015
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13V. A. Arrieta, C. Dmello, D. J. McGrail, et al., “Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Glioblastoma: From Tumor Heterogeneity to Personalized Treatment,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 133 (2023): e163447.
10.1172/JCI163447
Web of Science® Google Scholar
14N. D. Mathewson, O. Ashenberg, I. Tirosh, et al., “Inhibitory CD161 Receptor Identified in Glioma-Infiltrating T Cells by Single-Cell Analysis,” Cell 184 (2021): 1281–1298.
10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.022
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15J. Hu, Q. Xiao, M. Dong, D. Guo, X. Wu, and B. Wang, “Glioblastoma Immunotherapy Targeting the Innate Immune Checkpoint CD47-SIRPα Axis,” Frontiers in Immunology 11 (2020): 593219.
10.3389/fimmu.2020.593219
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
16T. A. Martins, D. Kaymak, N. Tatari, et al., “Enhancing Anti-EGFRvIII CAR T Cell Therapy Against Glioblastoma With a Paracrine SIRPγ-Derived CD47 Blocker,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 9718.
10.1038/s41467-024-54129-w
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
17R. C. Larson and M. V. Maus, “Recent Advances and Discoveries in the Mechanisms and Functions of CAR T Cells,” Nature Reviews Cancer 21 (2021): 145–161.
10.1038/s41568-020-00323-z
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18A. S. Luksik, E. Yazigi, P. Shah, and C. M. Jackson, “CAR T Cell Therapy in Glioblastoma: Overcoming Challenges Related to Antigen Expression,” Cancers (Basel) 15, no. 5 (2023): 1414, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051414.
10.3390/cancers15051414
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19B. D. Choi, E. R. Gerstner, M. J. Frigault, et al., “Intraventricular CARv3-TEAM-E T Cells in Recurrent Glioblastoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 390, no. 14 (2024): 1290–1298, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2314390.
10.1056/NEJMoa2314390
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
20S. J. Bagley, M. Logun, J. A. Fraietta, et al., “Intrathecal Bivalent CAR T Cells Targeting EGFR and IL13Rα2 in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Phase 1 Trial Interim Results,” Nature Medicine 30, no. 5 (2024): 1320–1329, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02893-z.
10.1038/s41591-024-02893-z
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
21M. C. Burger, C. Zhang, P. N. Harter, et al., “CAR-Engineered NK Cells for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: Turning Innate Effectors Into Precision Tools for Cancer Immunotherapy,” Frontiers in Immunology 10 (2019): 2683.
10.3389/fimmu.2019.02683
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
22P. Zuo, Y. Li, C. He, et al., “Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Anti-GD2 CAR NK-92 Cells in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas,” Frontiers in Immunology 14 (2023): 1145706, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1145706.
10.3389/fimmu.2023.1145706
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
23A. Heczey, X. Xu, A. N. Courtney, et al., “Anti-GD2 CAR-NKT Cells in Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Updated Phase 1 Trial Interim Results,” Nature Medicine 29, no. 6 (2023): 1379–1388, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02363-y.
10.1038/s41591-023-02363-y
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
24C. Chen, W. Jing, Y. Chen, et al., “Intracavity Generation of Glioma Stem Cell-Specific CAR Macrophages Primes Locoregional Immunity for Postoperative Glioblastoma Therapy,” Science Translational Medicine 14, no. 656 (2022): eabn1128, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abn1128.
10.1126/scitranslmed.abn1128
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
25J. L. Gardell, L. R. Matsumoto, H. Chinn, et al., “Human Macrophages Engineered to Secrete a Bispecific T Cell Engager Support Antigen-Dependent T Cell Responses to Glioblastoma,” Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer 8 (2020): e001202.
10.1136/jitc-2020-001202
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
26Y. Xia, L. Rao, H. Yao, Z. Wang, P. Ning, and X. Chen, “Engineering Macrophages for Cancer Immunotherapy and Drug Delivery,” Advanced Materials 32 (2020): 2002054.
10.1002/adma.202002054
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
27C. Sun, S. Wang, Z. Ma, et al., “Neutrophils in Glioma Microenvironment: From Immune Function to Immunotherapy,” Frontiers in Immunology 15 (2024): 1393173.
10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393173
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
28R. Sun, M. Liu, J. Lu, et al., “Bacteria Loaded With Glucose Polymer and Photosensitive ICG Silicon-Nanoparticles for Glioblastoma Photothermal Immunotherapy,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 5127.
10.1038/s41467-022-32837-5
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
29Y. Chang, X. Cai, R. Syahirah, et al., “CAR-Neutrophil Mediated Delivery of Tumor-Microenvironment Responsive Nanodrugs for Glioblastoma Chemo-Immunotherapy,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 2266.
10.1038/s41467-023-37872-4
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
30B. Zhu, H. Yin, D. Zhang, et al., “Synthetic Biology Approaches for Improving the Specificity and Efficacy of cancer Immunotherapy,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology 21 (2024): 436–447.
10.1038/s41423-024-01153-x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
31N. Zhao, Y. Song, X. Xie, et al., “Synthetic Biology-Inspired Cell Engineering in Diagnosis, Treatment and Drug Development,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 8 (2023): 112.
10.1038/s41392-023-01375-x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
32Z. Xiong, I. Raphael, M. Olin, H. Okada, X. Li, and G. Kohanbash, “Glioblastoma vaccines: past, present, and opportunities,” eBioMedicine 100 (2024): 104963.
10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104963
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
33H. R. Mendez-Gomez, A. DeVries, P. Castillo, et al., “RNA Aggregates Harness the Danger Response for Potent cancer Immunotherapy,” Cell 187 (2024): 2521–2535.
10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.003
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
34P. Kadiyala, D. Li, F. M. Nuñez, et al., “High-Density Lipoprotein-Mimicking Nanodiscs for Chemo-Immunotherapy Against Glioblastoma Multiforme,” ACS Nano 13, no. 2 (2019): 1365–1384, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b06842.
10.1021/acsnano.8b06842
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
35G. C. Terstappen, A. H. Meyer, R. D. Bell, and W. Zhang, “Strategies for Delivering Therapeutics Across the Blood-Brain Barrier,” Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery 20 (2021): 362–383.
10.1038/s41573-021-00139-y
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
36J. W. Roberts, L. Powlovich, N. Sheybani, and S. LeBlang, “Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Glioblastoma,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology 157 (2022): 237–247.
10.1007/s11060-022-03974-0
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
37W. Yue, L. Chen, L. Yu, et al., “Checkpoint Blockade and Nanosonosensitizer-Augmented Noninvasive Sonodynamic Therapy Combination Reduces Tumour Growth and Metastases in Mice,” Nature Communications 10 (2019): 2025.
10.1038/s41467-019-09760-3
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
38L. Zitvogel, L. Apetoh, F. Ghiringhelli, and G. Kroemer, “Immunological Aspects of cancer Chemotherapy,” Nature Reviews. Immunology 8 (2008): 59–73.
10.1038/nri2216
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
39M. Takahashi, H. B. Chong, S. Zhang, et al., “DrugMap: A Quantitative pan-cancer Analysis of Cysteine Ligandability,” Cell 187 (2024): 2536–2556.
10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.027
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
40S. A. Abdel-Rahman and M. Gabr, “Small Molecule Immunomodulators as Next-Generation Therapeutics for Glioblastoma,” Cancers (Basel) 16 (2024): 435.
10.3390/cancers16020435
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
41H. L. Kaufman, F. J. Kohlhapp, and A. Zloza, “Oncolytic Viruses: A New Class of Immunotherapy Drugs,” Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery 14 (2015): 642–662.
10.1038/nrd4663
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
42K. Mokhtarpour, M. Akbarzadehmoallemkolaei, and N. Rezaei, “A Viral Attack on Brain Tumors: The Potential of Oncolytic Virus Therapy,” Journal of Neurovirology 30 (2024): 229–250.
10.1007/s13365-024-01209-8
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
43D. Saha, R. L. Martuza, and S. D. Rabkin, “Macrophage Polarization Contributes to Glioblastoma Eradication by Combination Immunovirotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Blockade,” Cancer Cell 32 (2017): 253–267.
10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.006
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
44Y. Umemura, D. Orringer, L. Junck, et al., “Combined Cytotoxic and Immune-Stimulatory Gene Therapy for Primary Adult High-Grade Glioma: A Phase 1, First-In-Human Trial,” Lancet Oncology 24, no. 9 (2023): 1042–1052, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00347-9.
10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00347-9
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
45D. J. Propper and F. R. Balkwill, “Harnessing Cytokines and Chemokines for cancer Therapy,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 19 (2022): 237–253.
10.1038/s41571-021-00588-9
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
46J. G. Pol, S. T. Workenhe, P. Konda, S. Gujar, and G. Kroemer, “Cytokines in Oncolytic Virotherapy,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 56 (2020): 4–27.
10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.10.007
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
47L. Tang, M. Zhang, and C. Liu, “Advances in Nanotechnology-Based Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma,” Frontiers in Immunology 13 (2022): 882257.
10.3389/fimmu.2022.882257
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
48T. Weiss, E. Puca, M. Silginer, et al., “Immunocytokines Are a Promising Immunotherapeutic Approach Against Glioblastoma,” Science Translational Medicine 12, no. 564 (2020): eabb2311, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abb2311.
10.1126/scitranslmed.abb2311
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
49J. H. Sampson, A. Singh Achrol, M. K. Aghi, et al., “Targeting the IL4 Receptor With MDNA55 in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: Results of a Phase IIb Trial,” Neuro-Oncology 25, no. 6 (2023): 1085–1097, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac285.
10.1093/neuonc/noac285
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
50A. Louveau, I. Smirnov, T. J. Keyes, et al., “Structural and Functional Features of Central Nervous System Lymphatic Vessels,” Nature 523, no. 7560 (2015): 337–341, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14432.
10.1038/nature14432
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
51M. Schwartz, M. A. Abellanas, A. Tsitsou-Kampeli, and S. Suzzi, “The Brain-Immune Ecosystem: Implications for Immunotherapy in Defeating Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Neuron 110 (2022): 3421–3424.
10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.007
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
52A. C. Yang, F. Kern, P. M. Losada, et al., “Dysregulation of Brain and Choroid Plexus Cell Types in Severe COVID-19,” Nature 595 (2021): 565–571.
10.1038/s41586-021-03710-0
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
53B. Engelhardt, P. Vajkoczy, and R. O. Weller, “The Movers and Shapers in Immune Privilege of the CNS,” Nature Immunology 18 (2017): 123–131.
10.1038/ni.3666
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
54I. Strominger, Y. Elyahu, O. Berner, et al., “The Choroid Plexus Functions as a Niche for T-Cell Stimulation Within the Central Nervous System,” Frontiers in Immunology 9 (2018): 1066.
10.3389/fimmu.2018.01066
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
55A. Reboldi, C. Coisne, D. Baumjohann, et al., “C-C Chemokine Receptor 6-Regulated Entry of TH-17 Cells Into the CNS Through the Choroid Plexus Is Required for the Initiation of EAE,” Nature Immunology 10, no. 5 (2009): 514–523, https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1716.
10.1038/ni.1716
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
56G. Kunis, K. Baruch, N. Rosenzweig, et al., “IFN-γ-Dependent Activation of the brain's Choroid Plexus for CNS Immune Surveillance and Repair,” Brain 136 (2013): 3427–3440.
10.1093/brain/awt259
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
57N. Dani, R. H. Herbst, C. McCabe, et al., “A Cellular and Spatial Map of the Choroid Plexus Across Brain Ventricles and Ages,” Cell 184 (2021): 3056–3074.
10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.003
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
58K. Baruch, A. Deczkowska, E. David, et al., “Aging-Induced Type I Interferon Response at the Choroid Plexus Negatively Affects Brain Function,” Science 346, no. 6205 (2014): 89–93, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252945.
10.1126/science.1252945
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
59C. H. Mazucanti, V. Kennedy, Jr., H. U. Premathilake, et al., “AAV5-Mediated Manipulation of Insulin Expression in Choroid Plexus Has Long-Term Metabolic and Behavioral Consequences,” Cell Reports 42 (2023): 112903.
10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112903
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
60A. Jang, B. Petrova, T. C. Cheong, et al., “Choroid Plexus-CSF-Targeted Antioxidant Therapy Protects the Brain From Toxicity of cancer Chemotherapy,” Neuron 110 (2022): 3288–3301.
10.1016/j.neuron.2022.08.009
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
61K. Møllgård, F. R. M. Beinlich, P. Kusk, et al., “A Mesothelium Divides the Subarachnoid Space Into Functional Compartments,” Science 379 (2023): 84–88.
10.1126/science.adc8810
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
62R. Rua and D. B. McGavern, “Advances in Meningeal Immunity,” Trends in Molecular Medicine 24 (2018): 542–559.
10.1016/j.molmed.2018.04.003
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
63X. Hu, Q. Deng, L. Ma, et al., “Meningeal Lymphatic Vessels Regulate Brain Tumor Drainage and Immunity,” Cell Research 30, no. 3 (2020): 229–243, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0287-8.
10.1038/s41422-020-0287-8
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
64X. Li, L. Qi, D. Yang, et al., “Meningeal Lymphatic Vessels Mediate Neurotropic Viral Drainage From the Central Nervous System,” Nature Neuroscience 25, no. 5 (2022): 577–587, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01063-z.
10.1038/s41593-022-01063-z
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
65M. S. Graham and I. K. Mellinghoff, “Meningeal Lymphatics Prime Tumor Immunity in Glioblastoma,” Cancer Cell 39 (2021): 304–306.
10.1016/j.ccell.2021.02.012
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
66E. Song, T. Mao, H. Dong, et al., “VEGF-C-Driven Lymphatic Drainage Enables Immunosurveillance of Brain Tumours,” Nature 577, no. 7792 (2020): 689–694, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1912-x.
10.1038/s41586-019-1912-x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
67C. Zhou, L. Ma, H. Xu, Y. Huo, and J. Luo, “Meningeal Lymphatics Regulate Radiotherapy Efficacy Through Modulating Anti-Tumor Immunity,” Cell Research 32 (2022): 543–554.
10.1038/s41422-022-00639-5
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
68D. F. Quail and J. A. Joyce, “The Microenvironmental Landscape of Brain Tumors,” Cancer Cell 31 (2017): 326–341.
10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.009
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
69F. Yang, M. N. Akhtar, D. Zhang, et al., “An Immunosuppressive Vascular Niche Drives Macrophage Polarization and Immunotherapy Resistance in Glioblastoma,” Science Advances 10, no. 9 (2024): eadj4678, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj4678.
10.1126/sciadv.adj4678
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
70W. Zhou, C. Chen, Y. Shi, et al., “Targeting Glioma Stem Cell-Derived Pericytes Disrupts the Blood-Tumor Barrier and Improves Chemotherapeutic Efficacy,” Cell Stem Cell 21 (2017): 591–603.
10.1016/j.stem.2017.10.002
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
71X.-N. Zhang, K.-D. Yang, C. Chen, et al., “Pericytes Augment Glioblastoma Cell Resistance to Temozolomide Through CCL5-CCR5 Paracrine Signaling,” Cell Research 31 (2021): 1072–1087.
10.1038/s41422-021-00528-3
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
72A. Griveau, G. Seano, S. J. Shelton, et al., “A Glial Signature and Wnt7 Signaling Regulate Glioma-Vascular Interactions and Tumor Microenvironment,” Cancer Cell 33 (2018): 874–889.
10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.020
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
73S. Krishna, A. Choudhury, M. B. Keough, et al., “Glioblastoma Remodelling of Human Neural Circuits Decreases Survival,” Nature 617, no. 7961 (2023): 599–607, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06036-1.
10.1038/s41586-023-06036-1
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
74K. R. Taylor, T. Barron, A. Hui, et al., “Glioma Synapses Recruit Mechanisms of Adaptive Plasticity,” Nature 623 (2023): 366–374.
10.1038/s41586-023-06678-1
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
75D. Henrik Heiland, V. M. Ravi, S. P. Behringer, et al., “Tumor-Associated Reactive Astrocytes Aid the Evolution of Immunosuppressive Environment in Glioblastoma,” Nature Communications 10 (2019): 2541.
10.1038/s41467-019-10493-6
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
76D. C. Watson, D. Bayik, S. Storevik, et al., “GAP43-Dependent Mitochondria Transfer From Astrocytes Enhances Glioblastoma Tumorigenicity,” Nature Cancer 4, no. 5 (2023): 648–664, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-023-00556-5.
10.1038/s43018-023-00556-5
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
77H.-J. Kim, J. H. Park, H. C. Kim, C. W. Kim, I. Kang, and H. K. Lee, “Blood Monocyte-Derived CD169+ Macrophages Contribute to Antitumor Immunity Against Glioblastoma,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 6211.
10.1038/s41467-022-34001-5
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
78A. De Leo, A. Ugolini, X. Yu, et al., “Glucose-Driven Histone Lactylation Promotes the Immunosuppressive Activity of Monocyte-Derived Macrophages in Glioblastoma,” Immunity 57 (2024): 1105–1123.
10.1016/j.immuni.2024.04.006
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
79U. Onubogu, C. D. Gatenbee, S. Prabhakaran, et al., “Spatial Analysis of Recurrent Glioblastoma Reveals Perivascular Niche Organization,” JCI Insight 9, no. 12 (2024): e179853, https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.179853.
10.1172/jci.insight.179853
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
80J. E. Gervasoni, Jr., S. Sbayi, and B. Cady, “Role of Lymphadenectomy in Surgical Treatment of Solid Tumors: An Update on the Clinical Data,” Annals of Surgical Oncology 14 (2007): 2443–2462.
10.1245/s10434-007-9360-5
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
81R. Saddawi-Konefka, S. Schokrpur, and J. S. Gutkind, “Let It Be: Preserving Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes in the Era of Immuno-Oncology,” Cancer Cell 42 (2024): 930–933.
10.1016/j.ccell.2024.05.015
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
82C. R. Goodwin, L. Liang, N. Abu-Bonsrah, et al., “Extraneural Glioblastoma Multiforme Vertebral Metastasis,” World Neurosurgery 89 (2016): 578–582.
10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.061
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
83A. Cugurra, T. Mamuladze, J. Rustenhoven, et al., “Skull and Vertebral Bone Marrow Are Myeloid Cell Reservoirs for the Meninges and CNS Parenchyma,” Science 373, no. 6553 (2021): eabf7844, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf7844.
10.1126/science.abf7844
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
84J. A. Mazzitelli, F. E. Pulous, L. C. D. Smyth, et al., “Skull Bone Marrow Channels as Immune Gateways to the Central Nervous System,” Nature Neuroscience 26 (2023): 2052–2062.
10.1038/s41593-023-01487-1
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
85M. Lad, A. S. Beniwal, S. Jain, et al., “Glioblastoma Induces the Recruitment and Differentiation of Dendritic-Like “Hybrid” Neutrophils From Skull Bone Marrow,” Cancer Cell 42 (2024): 1549–1569.
10.1016/j.ccell.2024.08.008
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
86R. G. Majzner, S. Ramakrishna, K. W. Yeom, et al., “GD2-CAR T Cell Therapy for H3K27M-Mutated Diffuse Midline Gliomas,” Nature 603 (2022): 934–941.
10.1038/s41586-022-04489-4
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
87C. Dobersalske, L. Rauschenbach, Y. Hua, et al., “Cranioencephalic Functional Lymphoid Units in Glioblastoma,” Nature Medicine 30 (2024): 2947–2956.
10.1038/s41591-024-03152-x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
88Z. I. Kolabas, L. B. Kuemmerle, R. Perneczky, et al., “Distinct Molecular Profiles of Skull Bone Marrow in Health and Neurological Disorders,” Cell 186 (2023): 3706–3725.
10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.009
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Volume116, Issue6

June 2025

Pages 1482-1499

Opportunities to Modulate Tumor Ecosystem Toward Successful Glioblastoma Immunotherapy

ABSTRACT

1 Introduction