Volume 187, Issue S1 pp. 32-33
Abstract
Free Access

P05: Eosinophilic fasciitis triggered by intensive exercise

First published: 05 July 2022

Antonia D’Cruz, Marie-Louise Daly, Ljubomir Novakovic, Gerald Coakley, Nathan Asher, Manpreet Gulati and Monika Saha

Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK

A 59-year-old white female who was previously fit and well, developed gradual tightening and thickening of the skin on her forearms progressing to the abdomen, chest and lower legs associated with restricted movement. She also noticed bruise-like patches on her trunk. There were no systemic symptoms and no history of Raynaud syndrome. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 lockdown, the patient had engaged in increasing amounts of exercise compared with normal; this included yoga once weekly for 75 min, high-intensity interval training for 20 min on alternate days, running three times weekly for 45 min, lifting 2.5 kg weights for the arms every day and regular long walks. Examination showed a ‘groove’ sign on her forearms and a peau d’orange appearance of the skin with a woody induration and hardness on palpation. Symmetrical and circumferential involvement on the forearms and lower legs and bruise-like indurated patches on the abdomen were noted. Differential diagnoses included eosinophilic fasciitis (EF), morphoea, EF/morphoea overlap, scleroderma, scleromyxoedema and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Blood investigations showed an eosinophilia of 1.2 × 109 cells L–1, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 31 mm h–1, a C-reactive protein of 20 mg L–1 and negative autoimmune and viral serology. She underwent two incisional biopsies down to fascia. The first was taken from the back, which showed an interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells and very occasional eosinophils. The subcutaneous septa were minimally thickened. The second biopsy taken from the left forearm showed striking thickening of the subcutaneous septa, with an associated inflammatory cell infiltrate, composed predominantly of lymphocytes and plasma cells. This process was deeper and more established than that seen in the biopsy from the trunk. The appearances were clearly those of a sclerosing process of the dermis and subcutis and consistent with eosinophilic fasciitis. Our diagnosis was EF with morphoea overlap and she was treated with oral methotrexate 15 mg weekly and oral prednisolone 50 mg once daily (weight 60 kg), reducing the dose by 5 mg every 2 weeks. An 80% improvement was seen in functionality within 3 months, but the skin remained tight and thickened and therefore the patient was referred for phototherapy [ultraviolet A 1 (UVA1)] as combination therapy. We present a rare case of EF, which appears to have been triggered by intensive exercise. Other causes include insect bites, radiation, infections (Mycoplasma and Borrelia) and paraneoplastic. Haematological associations have been seen, including aplastic anaemia and lymphoma. Treatment options for EF include prednisolone, UVA1/psoralen + UVA, immunosuppressive systemic agents (including ciclosporin and methotrexate), biological agents (including infliximab and rituximab) and physiotherapy.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.