Volume 95, Issue 5 pp. e431-e432
Letter to the Editor
Free Access

Intra-operative microscope-integrated swept-source optical coherence tomography guided placement of Argus II retinal prosthesis

Dilraj S. Grewal

Dilraj S. Grewal

Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Oscar M. Carrasco-Zevallos

Oscar M. Carrasco-Zevallos

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Randall Gunther

Randall Gunther

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph A. Izatt

Joseph A. Izatt

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Cynthia A. Toth

Cynthia A. Toth

Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Hahn

Corresponding Author

Paul Hahn

Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

Correspondence:

Paul Hahn, MD, PhD

DUMC 3802

Durham, NC 27710, USA

Tel: +1 919 688-3316

Fax: +1 919 681 6474

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 June 2016
Citations: 10

This project was funded by the NIH Bioengineering Research Partnership Grant: R01- EY-023039 “Intraoperative OCT Guidance of Intraocular Surgery” (Izatt/Toth).

All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Paul Hahn reports a consulting agreement with Second Sight Medical Products, Inc. Sylmar, CA. No other disclosures were reported. The authors have full control of all primary data.

This project was funded by the NIH Bioengineering Research Partnership Grant: R01-EY-023039 ‘Intraoperative OCT Guidance of Intraocular Surgery’ (Izatt/Toth). Heed Ophthalmic Foundation (San Francisco, CA) and Ronald G. Michels Fellowship Foundation (Riderwood, MD) (DSG).
Presentation at a conference: This paper has not been presented in any conference.
Editor,

The Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System (Second Sight Medical Products, Sylmar, CA, USA) is an epiretinal device approved for implantation in severe retinitis pigmentosa (RP). During implantation, the most challenging surgical manoeuvre is correct positioning and tacking the electrode array to the retina (Rizzo et al. 2014). Proximity of electrodes to the retinal surface is important for proper function and is challenging to confirming intra-operatively as the surgical microscope may not provide optimal axial resolution (Ahuja & Behrend 2013). We demonstrate a research-prototype microscope-integrated high-speed (100 000 A-scans/second) swept-source optical coherence tomography (MIOCT) device for intra-operative optical coherence tomography (OCT) acquisition simultaneous with surgical manoeuvres allowing intra-operative array position confirmation (Hahn et al. 2013).

A 46-year-old phakic male with advanced RP and bare light-perception vision underwent Argus II implantation. Following phacoemulsification, the coil and scleral band were positioned as described previously (Rizzo et al. 2014; Ho et al. 2015). A complete vitrectomy was performed, and the array tacked centred over the fovea, followed by closure (Rizzo et al. 2014; Ho et al. 2015).

Intra-operative OCT images were acquired at 2-10 volumes/second, concurrent with live surgical manoeuvres. The acquired MIOCT data were processed in real time and displayed in three formats: B-scans, en face maximum intensity projections (MIP), and denoized volumes rendered in real time with lighting, edge and depth-enhanced ray casting. All three formats were projected on a wall-mounted operating suite display for real-time surgeon feedback.

The MIOCT imaging protocol consisted of 6 × 7.5 × 7.5 mm scans acquired during array positioning, tack placement and post-tacking. Specific advantages were noted in each step:

Preretinal tack placement: Microscope-integrated swept-source optical coherence tomography (MIOCT) permitted real-time confirmation of appropriate array positioning prior to proceeding with tack placement (Fig. 1A shows the array tilted in relation to the retina as it is lowered to the retinal surface). Microscope-integrated swept-source optical coherence tomography (MIOCT) can also determine the adequacy of epiretinal membrane peel, if performed (Rizzo et al. 2014).

Details are in the caption following the image
Intra-operative microscope-integrated high-speed (100 000 A-scans/second) swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging: Sequential OCT B-scans (left column) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) en face MIOCT images (right column) during placement of the metallic retinal tack to secure the array. Prior to retinal tacking, the array (posterior array margins visualized as hyper-reflective surfaces indicated by yellow arrows, the array handle visualized as a hyper-reflective oval indicated by the red star and the cable by the white star) is tilted on the retinal surface (A). As the 19-gauge tacking forceps (shadow cast by the forceps indicated with the white triangle) initially lowers the array towards the retina, the array is visualized still not fully apposed to the retinal surface (B). With progressive pressure with the tacking forceps, array apposition is visualized (C). Further pressure during tack placement results in posterior displacement of the globe, causing part of the image to temporarily move out of the OCT imaging range, resulting in a mirror image artefact on the B-scan and a circumferential darkening of the retinal surface surrounding the array on the en face MIP image (D, white arrows). Following tack placement and release of the tacking forceps, the OCT images return to within imaging range and B-scan confirms close approximation of the array with the inner retinal surface and centration over the foveal pit as shown by the yellow star (E). Postretinal tack placement intra-operative MIOCT B-scans show appropriate position of the entire array as represented in the three shown locations (E–G). Note the close approximation of the array (yellow arrows) with the inner retinal surface (E–G) and centration over the foveal pit (E, yellow star). Shadowing is noted directly below the metal electrodes (E–G, red arrows) and under the metal tack (G, blue star), and penetration of the tack through the retinal layers therefore cannot be visualized with OCT. In contrast, the transparent polymer between these electrodes allows visibility of the underlying retina. Figure H shows a distance topography map demonstrating the electrode-inner retina distances in microns. The map was created using the Duke OCT Retinal Analysis Program (DOCTRAP) by manually segmenting the lower boundary of the array and inner boundary of the retina on each individual B-scan. The area in red represents increased array-retina distance at the foveal pit. Postoperative spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg, Germany) obtained in clinic 4 weeks postimplantation confirms continued optimal array position overlying the foveal pit (yellow star) without a visible shift in position between the intra-operative supine position (A–G) and postoperative sitting position in clinic (I).

Retinal tack placement: Microscope-integrated swept-source optical coherence tomography (MIOCT) allowed real-time visualization of retinal tack placement (Video S1) (Fig. 1B–F). When using the tack forceps to secure the electrode array over the macula, pressure is applied perpendicular to the retinal surface to penetrate the tack through the sclera (Sight 2013). On B-scan images, array boundaries were visualized as hyper-reflective surfaces and the array handle as a hyper-reflective oval. As pressure was applied with the tack forceps, array apposition was directly visualized on OCT.

Postretinal tack placement: After release of the tack forceps, MIOCT permitted intra-operative confirmation of electrode-inner retinal surface apposition (Fig. 1E–G) and centration over the foveal pit. Electrode-inner retinal surface distances, which have been shown to correlate with threshold levels of electrode stimulation, were determined by manually creating a distance map that also confirmed array centration over the foveal pit (Fig. 1H) (Ahuja et al. 2013). Array position variability in the intra-operative prone position and the postoperative standing or sitting position has been questioned (Rizzo et al. 2014). We confirmed this stability by comparing intra-operative and postoperative OCT scans (Fig. 1I).

Dislodged or improperly positioned retinal tacks were reported in 2/30 (6.7%) eyes during clinical trials. Improper positioning was not noted in either case intra-operatively and both required revision surgeries (Ho et al. 2015). Microscope-integrated swept-source optical coherence tomography (MIOCT)-based intra-operative confirmation of array position can potentially avoid this scenario. Microscope-integrated swept-source optical coherence tomography (MIOCT) allows near real-time capture of volumetric data and the ability to view individual B-scans in any area of interest. This is in contrast to spectral-domain-based intra-operative OCT systems, wherein an area of interest needs to be identified prior to image acquisition, and maintained in the same plane intra-operatively, which is challenging.

In conclusion, Argus II implantation with a prototype MIOCT device was successfully performed, enabling intra-operative cross-sectional visualization. MIOCT allowed real-time confirmation of array position pre-, intra- and post-tack placement and confirmed the adequacy of tacking in securing the array in close contact with the retina. This may help optimize outcomes and prevent known complications of Argus II implantation, and further investigation into its utility is warranted.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.