Volume 14, Issue 8 pp. 1839-1845
Original Article
Free Access

Alemtuzumab in Lung Transplantation: An Open-Label, Randomized, Prospective Single Center Study

P. Jaksch

Corresponding Author

P. Jaksch

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

Corresponding author: Peter Jaksch, [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
J. Ankersmit

J. Ankersmit

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
A. Scheed

A. Scheed

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
A. Kocher

A. Kocher

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
G. Muraközy

G. Muraközy

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
W. Klepetko

W. Klepetko

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
G. Lang

G. Lang

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 July 2014
Citations: 45

Abstract

Induction therapy with alemtuzumab followed by lower maintenance immunosuppression (IS) has been associated with reduced morbidity and mortality in abdominal and heart transplantation (TX). In the current study, alemtuzumab, in combination with reduced levels of maintenance IS, was compared to thymoglobulin in combination with standard IS. Sixty consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation (LUTX) at a single center were prospectively randomized in two groups: group A received alemtuzumab in conjunction with reduced doses of tacrolimus, steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. Group B received thymoglobulin in association with standard dose IS. Patient and graft survival, freedom from acute cellular rejection (ACR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, kidney function, infectious complications and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder were analyzed. Alemtuzumab induction therapy resulted in complete the absence of ACR episodes ≥ A2 within the first year post-TX. The difference to thymoglobulin was significant (alemtuzumab 0 vs. ATG 0.33; p = 0.019). All other factors studied did not show any differences between the two groups. Alemtuzumab induction therapy after LUTX in combination with reduced maintenance IS significantly reduces higher-grade rejection rates. This novel therapeutic agent had no impact on survival, infections rates, kidney function and incidence of malignancies.

Abbreviations

  • ACR
  • acute cellular rejection
  • BOS
  • bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome
  • CMV
  • cytomegalovirus
  • CNI
  • calcineurin inhibitor
  • Dac
  • daclizumab
  • ICU
  • intensive care unit
  • IS
  • immunosuppression
  • LB
  • lymphocytic bronchiolitis
  • LUTX
  • lung transplantation
  • MMF
  • mycophenolate mofetil
  • NI
  • no induction
  • PTLD
  • posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder
  • TX
  • transplantation
  • Introduction

    One- and 5-year survival following lung transplantation (LUTX) has significantly improved over the past two decades as a result of multiple factors. The biggest gain in survival has been achieved in the first 6–12 months posttransplantation (post-TX) with comparable little change in the long-term mortality rates.

    These results reflect contemporary immunosuppression (IS) strategies with triple-drug calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive therapy for the majority of the patients.

    According to the 29th report from the Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) 1, the current immunosuppressive protocols after LUTX include in >95% of patients a CNI (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus), in 80% cell cycle inhibitors (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] or azathioprine) and in >95% steroids.

    However, the direct, nonimmunosuppressive toxicities of chronic CNI and steroid use, such as hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and renal dysfunction, are well described, pervasive and may contribute to a diminished quality of life and reduced long-term survival.

    Approximately 60% of LUTX patients receive some type of induction therapy. The most important argument in favor of induction therapy 2-8 is the high rate of acute rejection episodes in the early postoperative period, one of the highest in solid organ TX.

    A broad spectrum of different induction medications exists. The most frequently used are polyclonal anti-lymphocyte preparations (20%), anti-IL-2-antibodies (40%), OKT3 (4%) and alemtuzumab (10%) 9.

    More recently alemtuzumab, a humanized rat monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody, has been introduced into clinical practice and used off label as an induction agent. Even with one single dose of 30 mg prolonged lymphocyte depletion can be achieved. CD52 is expressed on 95% of peripheral blood lymphocytes, natural killer cells, monocytes, macrophages and thymocytes. Monocytes and B cell recovery can be seen after 3 and 12 months, respectively, while T cells recover only to 50% after 36 months 9. Alemtuzumab, therefore, is an extremely powerful cytolytic agent and has been used therapeutically in bone marrow TX, several autoimmune diseases and organ TX.

    Recently, McCurry et al investigated the use of alemtuzumab as an induction agent with reduced IS levels 10, 11 in LUTX patients and reported very promising results.

    One-year survival was 93% in the alemtuzumab—cohort, which was significantly higher compared to no induction (NI) or use of daclizumab (Dac). Moreover, freedom from acute cellular rejection (ACR) was significantly higher in the alemtuzumab—cohort compared with the NI cohort (p = 0.0007), but although there was as well a trend toward greater freedom from ACR in the alemtuzumab-cohort compared with the use of Dac, this did not reach significance (p = 0.07).

    Besides the impact of alemtuzumab on ACR rates, the lower exposure to immunosuppressant agents might result in lower nephrotoxicity, one of the main long-term problems after LUTX.

    With the current clinical trial we intended to strengthen the currently available evidence for the use of alemtuzumab in LUTX.

    Methods

    Study design

    The study was an open-label, controlled, randomized study, conducted at the General Hospital Vienna, Medical University of Vienna (EudraCT number: 2007-001815-51). Patients were randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms: group A received alemtuzumab (Campath-1H; Berlex, Montville, NJ) 30 mg one single dose combined with tacrolimus (target trough level 10–12 ng/mL first 3 months, 8–10 ng/mL months 4–24), MMF (1.5 g/day) and corticosteroids in a reduced dosage regime. Group B received IMTIX-Sangstat ATG-induction on days 0–4 with a dosage of 5 mg/kg body weight combined with tacrolimus (target trough level 15–18 ng/mL first 3 months, 12–15 ng/mL months 4–24), MMF (3 g/day) and corticosteroids at standard levels. Actual trough levels are listed in Table 1. Randomization took place immediately after TX using the Randomizer for Clinical Trials 1.8.1 (Copyright © 2002–2013 Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz).

    Table 1. Trough levels and dosage of immunosuppressive drugs
    ATG Alemtuzumab p
    FK through level
    3 months 12.1 ± 3.9 10.9 ± 3.1 0.24
    6 months 11.4 ± 3.3 10.3 ± 3.4 0.25
    12 months 11.1 ± 3.9 9.4 ± 3.1 0.08
    MMF dose (g)
    3 months 1.0 ± 0.9 0.3 ± 0.48 0.08
    6 months 0.5 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.48 0.29
    12 months 0.6 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.41 0.9
    Steroid dose (mg)
    3 months 18.2 ± 5.2 12.8 ± 3.4 0.01
    6 months 10.3 ± 3.1 8.6 ± 2.6 0.07
    12 months 5 5
    • FK, tacrolimus; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil.

    Study drug was not blinded due to the use of different maintenance drug regimens. The study was funded by Astellas Pharma Austria and approved by the institutional ethic review board. A written informed consent was provided by each participant before enrollment.

    We initiated a controlled, prospective randomized study in which patients were randomly assigned to receive either alemtuzumab, tacrolimus, MMF and corticosteroids in a reduced dosage regime or ATG-induction together with standard-dosed tacrolimus, MMF and corticosteroids.

    Availability of alemtuzumab

    Since August 2012 Genzyme has surrendered the license of alemtuzumab. This means that alemtuzumab is no longer available as a licensed product in Europe. This action was not being taken for any reasons related to product safety, efficacy or supply, but as the company's plan for bringing alemtuzumab forward as a treatment for a new indication. The company will continue to supply alemtuzumab commercially through a patient access program for oncological and transplant indications.

    Study objectives and hypothesis

    The objective of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the two regimens in patients undergoing lung or combined heart-lung TX with regard of drug-related complications and over or under IS-associated complications.

    We hypothesized that alemtuzumab with low triple IS would be associated with reduced ACR episodes and, due to the reduction of kidney toxicity, improved GFRs at 6, 12 and 24 months.

    Sample size determination was based on an evaluation of the ability to detect the superiority of alemtuzumab induction in combination with dose reduced triple IS. Primary end point was GFR after 6 and 12 months.

    Secondary end points were patient and graft survival, recurrent and ongoing rejection episodes, infectious complications and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS).

    The study was designed to continue to 2 years to assess safety and efficacy.

    Infectious prophylaxis

    All patients routinely received antibiotic prophylaxis with piperacillin/tazobactam for 2 weeks postoperatively. Cystic fibrosis patients and patients with recurrent infections received antibiotics according to resistance testing. Further evaluations including rejection and infection monitoring by transbronchial biopsy and lavage were routinely performed according to the center standards.

    All patients received cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis with at least 2 weeks of intravenous (IV) ganciclovir followed by an oral therapy until the end of the third postoperative month. High-risk patients (donor CMV positive/recipient CMV negative) were treated for 12 months, if tolerated, in combination with CMV hyperimmunoglobulin (1 mL/kg IV day 1, 7, 14 and 21 postop) (Cytotect-Biotest; Biotest Austria GmbH, Wien, Austria) 12, 13. Furthermore, every patient received Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis indefinitely as well as aerosolized amphotericin B for antifungal prophylaxis for at least 3 months after TX.

    Follow-up

    Surveillance bronchoscopies with transbronchial biopsy were performed 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after TX. In addition, bronchoscopies with biopsy were performed as clinically indicated for suspected rejection, infection or other pulmonary problems. All diagnoses of acute rejection were confirmed with biopsy specimens using standard histological criteria and grading. The first episode of acute rejection was treated with a 3-day course of high-dose methylprednisolone (500–1000 mg/day), and, if the maintenance prednisone dose had been tapered, it was gradually decreased back to the previous dose over 2–4 weeks.

    CMV infection was defined as an increase in viral load detected using quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction >1000 copies/mL. CMV disease was defined as CMV DNAemia in combination with symptoms and signs of organ involvement together with evidence of localized CMV infection on a biopsy or other appropriate specimen. CMV syndrome was defined as CMV DNAemia in combination with fever. Patients with positive bronchoalveolar lavage were counted as CMV pneumonitis if they had a compatible clinical and radiological picture. Bacterial colonization was defined as the presence of bacteria without clinical signs or symptoms and no or a preemptive treatment given. Bacterial infection was defined as the presence of bacteria with clinical signs and symptoms, and treatment.

    BOS was graded by two experienced transplant physicians following the ISHLT guidelines. There were no discrepancies in grading or time of onset between the two reviewers in all BOS cases.

    Kidney function was monitored by measurement of GFR, which was calculated from the creatinine concentration in the collected urine sample, urine flow rate and the plasma concentration.

    Statistics

    Sixty patients were included into the trial, that is, 30 patients in each treatment group. Analyses of efficacy and safety were performed on the full analysis set. All efficacy parameters were summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics, that is, number (%) of patients for categorical variables, and mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum for continuous variables.

    Study end points were compared between treatment groups by means of a one-sided chi-square test at a level of 5%.

    The incidences of adverse events were summarized separately for each treatment.

    If appropriate, the incidence rate of adverse events was compared using a chi square test.

    Results

    Study patients

    Patient enrollment started in January 2009 and ended in April 2010. A total of 60 patients were enrolled, 30 receiving alemtuzumab and 30 ATG. Baseline characteristics of the study patients are given in Table 2.

    Table 2. Demographics
    ATG Alemtuzumab p
    N = 30 N = 30
    Sex (F/M) 18/12 16/14 0.6
    Age (years) 49.3 ± 12.6 52.3 ± 11.2 0.4
    Diagnosis 0.7
    COPD 19 18
    IPF 2 4
    IPH 1 0
    CF 5 3
    Other 3 5
    Type of TX
    DLUTX/SLUTX 28/2 30/0 0.15
    Time on ICU (days) 7.4 ± 6.1 8.4 ± 7.1 0.8
    • CF, cystic fibrosis; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DLUTX, bilateral lung transplantation; ICU, intensive care unit; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; IPH, idiopathic portal hypertension; SLUTX, unilateral lung transplantation; TX, transplantation.

    Tolerability of induction agents

    Both antibody infusions were administered immediately as possible after arrival on the intensive care unit postoperatively. Patients from the alemtuzumab group received 30 mg alemtuzumab over 2 h just one time.

    Patients from the thymoglobulin group received 2 mg ATG/kg body weight on days 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 postoperative over 4 h.

    Both agents were generally well-tolerated without significant side effects.

    Survival

    There were no significant differences in 1- and 2-year survival (alemtuzumab 93% vs. ATG 96%, 90% vs. 96%, respectively, p = 0.1) (Figure 1).

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Freedom from acute cellular rejection (≥A2).

    Reasons for death were in all cases severe infections, one due to invasive aspergillosis. In one case re-TX due to bronchial stenosis was performed (Table 3).

    Table 3. Results and complications
    ATG Alemtuzumab p
    N = 30 N = 30
    Alive/death 29/1 26/4 0.1
    Reason for death
    Septicemia 0 4
    Aspergillus pneumonia 1 0
    BOS (n) 0 3 0.19
    Re-TX 0 1 0.5
    Infections
    Aspergillus fumigatus 4 6 0.49
    Invasive 2 4
    Tracheobronchitis 2 2
    Bacterial 0.85
    0 7 8
    1–3 14 16
    >4 7 8
    Colonized 7 7 0.6
    Tuberculosis 2 0 0.15
    Viral
    CMV viremia 9 10 0.79
    CMV disease 1 2 0.39
    RSV 1 0 0.5
    Creatinine 6 months post-LUTX 1.4 ± 0.46 1.4 ± 0.39 0.57
    Crea-clearance 6 months post-LUTX 67.8 63.0 0.52
    Number of biopsies first year (mean ± SD) 6.5 ± 1.6 6.9 ± 0.9 0.25
    ACR (first year)
    ≥A2 5 0 0.019
    A1 2 4 0.5
    CUM A (100 days) 0.44 ± 0.9 0.11 ± 0.38 0.85
    CUM B (100 days) 2.0 ± 1.6 1.6 ± 1.3 0.37
    SAE 0.6 ± 0.9 1.2 ± 1.8
    No of hospitalizations (first 2 years) 21 22 0.2
    Leukopenia 14 23 0.016
    TMA 0 2 0.3
    OPS 0 1 0.5
    Wound infection 1 0
    PRES 1 0
    Gastric bleeding 1 0
    Malignancies 1 0
    • ACR, acute cellular rejection; BOS, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CUM A,B, cummulative A,B-scores; LUTX, lung transplantation; OPS, organic psycho syndrome; PRES, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SAE, serious adverse events; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; TX, transplantation.

    Episodes of acute rejection

    The number of ACR episodes ≥ A2 within the first year post-TX was significantly lower in group A (alemtuzumab 0 vs. ATG five events in five patients; p = 0.019) (Figure 2); no recurrent or ongoing ACR was observed. Low-grade ACR (ISHLT grade A1) was observed in four patients from the alemtuzumab group and in two patients from the ATG cohort (p = 0.5). Lymphocytic bronchiolitis (LB) within the first year post-TX was not different between the groups (cumulative B scores group A 2.9 ± 2.7 vs. group B 3.2 ± 2.3/patient/year, p = 0.74) (Table 3).

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Freedom from BOS.

    Infectious complications

    There were no significant differences in bacterial (group A 2.1 ± 2.3 per patient vs. group B 2.3 ± 2.0, p = 0.95), CMV (group A 0.43 ± 0.5 per patient per vs. group B 0.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.79) or Aspergillus infections (group A 0.2 ± 0.4 vs. group B 0.13 ± 0.34, p = 0.49, respectively) within the first year between the groups (Table 3).

    Kidney function

    GFRs (mL/min) after 1 and 2 years also were not different (group A 62.4 ± 30.4 vs. group B 53.8 ± 23.3, p = 0.2, group A 56.7 ± 25.9 vs. group B 61.0 ± 27.2, p = 0.5, respectively) between both groups (Table 3).

    Chronic organ dysfunction

    Within the first 2 years post-TX four patients of group A (13%) and one patient of group B (3%) developed BOS≥1 (p = 0.19) (Figure 3 and Table 3).

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Survival.

    Adverse events

    The mean follow-up of the study cohort was 1330 ± 379 days with a range between 231 and 1835 days. Follow-up was 100% complete.

    One patient of group B developed malignancy of the lung (adenocarcinoma) 884 days post-TX. Episodes of leukopenia (<4000 G/L) within the first 2 years were frequent in both groups (group A [n = 23], group B [n = 14], p = 0.01) with a significant earlier and higher incidence after use of alemtuzumab (Table 3). In all cases of leukopenia MMF was stopped until leukocyte count normalized. In cases of severe leukopenia (<1500 G/L) granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered.

    Lymphocyte subpopulations

    CD3 and CD19 counts were measured every 3 months during the study period. T lymphocytes (CD3 cells) decreased in both study groups with a significant lower count in the alemtuzumab cohort and recovered after 12–18 months in both groups. CD19 counts decreased in the alemtuzumab group within the first 12 months significantly and recovered after 18–24 months; the ATG group showed a decrease after 3–6 months and recovered after 18–24 months post-LUTX.

    CD3 counts after 1, 6 and 12 months: ATG group versus alemtuzumab: 319 ± 353 versus 156 ± 428 (p = 0.13), 645 ± 396 versus 290 ± 276 (p = 0.013), 682 ± 377 versus 586 ± 612 (p = 0.5) cells/µL. CD19 counts after 1, 6 and 12 months: ATG versus alemtuzumab: 136 ± 102 versus 34 ± 113 (p = 0.01), 104 ± 80 versus 40 ± 72 (p = 0.02), 99 ± 92 versus 52 ± 45 (p = 0.05) cells/µL.

    Discussion

    We report the first prospective randomized study comparing thymoglobulin versus alemtuzumab as induction therapy in LUTX recipients. Thymoglobulin was administered in combination with standard triple drug maintenance therapy, whereas patients who received alemtuzumab had a triple drug therapy with decreased dosages of CNIs and steroids.

    Both induction medications are potent immunosuppressants; however, alemtuzumab appears to have a more pronounced effect on the immune system resulting in complete absence of higher rejection grades ≥ A2 within the first postoperative year. Of note, this result was achieved despite the fact that patients with alemtuzumab induction were on reduced maintenance IS. Furthermore, patients in this cohort showed a tendency toward a lower rate of LB but, due to the small sample size did not reach statistical significance.

    Interestingly enough, this significant reduction of acute higher-grade rejection episodes did not translate into a decrease in chronic rejection and—allograft dysfunction. In the scientific literature, ACR has been discussed as an important risk factor for BOS. In light of our results, it appears that infectious and nonalloimmune mechanisms may play a pivotal role as pathogenetic risk factor; their causative nature, however, remains unclear. ACR might only be a marker of general alloreactivity that accounts for chronic rejection.

    Patient- and graft-survival up to 2 years showed no significant difference between the study groups, which is consistent with the observations reported by McCurry et al 11.

    Alemtuzumab results in a long-lasting lymphopenia of both B- and T-lymphocytes, allowing for a reduction of maintenance IS.

    CNI-sparing protocols have been reported to reduce nephrotoxicity. We therefore hypothesized that significant lower doses of tacrolimus in the alemtuzumab group will yield a better kidney function. Nevertheless, despite less CNI exposure in the alemtuzumab-treated cohort, no difference in renal function was found between the groups after 1 and 2 years of follow-up.

    These findings are again in line with the scientific literature: most of the studies published 12-14 used alemtuzumab with a steroid or CNI-sparing protocol; however, none of these retrospective analyses showed a significant improvement of kidney function compared with conventional therapies.

    The use of alemtuzumab in conjunction with other bone marrow-suppressant medications such as valganciclovir and MMF has been associated with increased incidence of leukopenia in a number of our patients. The treatment consisted of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and discontinuation of MMF and valganciclovir. We even adopted the initial protocol and MMF therapy was only started after recovery of the T-lymphocyte count. Despite the long-lasting CD4 T cell depletion 15 for over 1 year mortality due to infection was not increased in alemtuzumab patients. This finding is somewhat surprising and confirms reports in other publications 16, 17 with a lack of opportunistic infections when it was used as induction agent.

    Similar to data reported by McCurry et al 10, 11, none of our patients developed early posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) despite aggressive T cell depletion. On the contrary, in a recent publication 18 alemtuzumab was shown to have a significant lower risk of PTLD compared to ATG with an incidence similar to that of patients receiving no induction therapy at all.

    This may relate to the B cell depleting effect as B cells serve as the reservoir for Epstein-Barr virus and the source cell type for malignant transformation.

    We have planned to investigate in future studies whether alemtuzumab, combined with an early lower-dose IS regimen, promotes tolerance 13, 19 or preserves regulatory T cell function and thereby might provide an advantage that persists in the setting of standard long-term maintenance IS.

    Study limitations are the small number of included patients, which limits of course the interpretation of the results. Differences in survival between the groups were not statistically significant different despite the fact that the number of deaths in the alemtuzumab group was higher (4 vs. 1 within the first 2 years). Also the incidence of BOS was higher in patients receiving alemtuzumab (4 vs. 1 within the first 2 years), which can reflect a subset of patients with chronic allograft dysfunction who develop BOS not due to immunologic reasons. Furthermore, we failed to reach the intended target levels of tacrolimus and MMF, which may explain the equal kidney function in both groups.

    Taken together, alemtuzumab induction therapy in conjunction with reduced maintenance IS after LUTX results in significantly reduced higher-grade rejection episodes with infectious complications rates comparable to standard IS. Despite these promising findings patients receiving alemtuzumab induction showed a trend toward worse survival rates and higher incidence of BOS after 2 years. Alemtuzumab seems to be a valuable potent immunosuppressant in LUTX but long-term safety profiles of this agent are warranted.

    Disclosure

    The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. The study was funded by Astellas Pharma Austria.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.