Volume 55, Issue 4 pp. 391-405
Full Access

Luenberger and Malmquist Productivity Indices: Theoretical Comparisons and Empirical Illustration

Jean-Philippe Boussemart

Jean-Philippe Boussemart

GREMARS, University of Lille 3,

Search for more papers by this author
Walter Briec

Walter Briec

JEREM, University of Perpignan,

Search for more papers by this author
Kristiaan Kerstens

Kristiaan Kerstens

CNRS-LABORES, IESEG and

Search for more papers by this author
Jean-Christophe Poutineau

Jean-Christophe Poutineau

CERESUR, University of La Reunion

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 September 2003
Citations: 146

Abstract

This contribution establishes, from a theoretical viewpoint, the relations between the Malmquist productivity indices, that measure in either input or output orientations, and the Luenberger productivity indices, that can simultaneously contract inputs and expand outputs, but that can also measure in either input or output orientations. The main result is that a Malmquist productivity index overestimates productivity changes, since it provides productivity measures that are nearly twice those given by the Luenberger productivity index looking for simultaneous contractions of inputs and expansions of outputs. This relationship is empirically illustrated using data from 20 OECD countries over the 1974–97 period.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.