Volume 12, Issue 7 e70259
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Open Access

Healthcare Professionals' Job Satisfaction and Its Determinants in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diriba Teshome

Corresponding Author

Diriba Teshome

Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Correspondence:

Diriba Teshome ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Metages Hunie

Metages Hunie

Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Moges Gelaw

Moges Gelaw

Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Basazinew Chekol

Basazinew Chekol

Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Wubet Alebachew

Wubet Alebachew

Department of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Demeke Mesfin Belay

Demeke Mesfin Belay

Department of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Bekalu Getnet

Bekalu Getnet

Department of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Dereje Zewdu

Dereje Zewdu

Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolkite University, Welkite, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Seyoum Hailu

Seyoum Hailu

Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Simegnew Kibret

Simegnew Kibret

Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
Efrem Fenta

Efrem Fenta

Department of Anesthesia, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 July 2025

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

ABSTRACT

Aim

This study targeted to determine the aggregated prevalence and determinants of job satisfaction of healthcare professionals in Ethiopia.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Literature has been systematically searched from databases like PubMed, Hinari, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Data were collected using Microsoft Excel and STATA 16 version was used for analysis. The I2 statistic was used to determine the significance of homogeneity. A 95% confidence interval with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) was used to show association.

Results

The aggregated prevalence of job satisfaction of healthcare professionals in Ethiopia was found to be 43.42%. Being married, having good recognition, having good remuneration, having adequate supervision and having good work security were positively associated with job satisfaction.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Conclusion

This study showed poor job satisfaction among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia. Therefore, strategies have to be designed to increase the level of satisfaction by all stakeholders.

1 Introduction

Healthcare professionals are paramount important in the healthcare system as they have great roles and responsibilities in ensuring the well-being of the patients and community at large (Engum and Jeffries 2012; Pillay 2009). Globally, the well-being of healthcare providers and their feelings about their job are important in securing quality healthcare for mankind (Bridgeman et al. 2018; Güler et al. 2019; Kang et al. 2020). As Ethiopia is among the developing countries, it is not deniable that its healthcare system is subjected to challenges (Kitaw et al. 2020; Woldemariam et al. n.d.).

The job satisfaction of healthcare professionals is indicating the feeling and beliefs that healthcare professionals have about their job (Goetz et al. 2015). A favourable attitude toward the job indicates job pleasure, while an opposed attitude toward the job indicates job disappointment. It is among the important variables that could be used to measure the quality of healthcare systems (Okoli et al. 2020; Ruiz-Fernández et al. 2020).

Job satisfaction could be measured by different components such as monthly payments like salary, working situation, prospects for personal and professional development, a manageable amount of work, presence of positive regulation, relationships and recognition, patient care outcomes, autonomy and contingent rewards (Okoli et al. 2020; Ramasodi 2012). If an individual is not satisfied with his/her job, he/she will be subjected to stress, absenteeism and intention to leave (Hooker et al. 2015).

Having highly satisfied healthcare professionals will contribute positively to the healthcare system of a country as it will lead to better performance and better patient outcomes (Thiagaraj and Thangaswamy 2017). Unsatisfied healthcare professionals will not work properly and will not stay in their profession (Kols et al. 2018). Addressing such a problem might be very difficult in a country like Ethiopia where there is no adequate work task force due to many factors (Debela et al. 2017).

Studies show the prevalence of health professionals' job satisfaction varies from 32% (Temesgen et al. 2018) to 61% (Ayalew et al. 2019). It is about 50% in Sudan (Suliman et al. 2017), and 18% in Pakistan (Tasneem et al. 2018). Varied reports from previous studies on prevalence and especially predicting factors of healthcare professionals' job satisfaction were the main reasons to trigger this study (Abate and Mekonnen 2021; Girma et al. 2021). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence and associated factors of job satisfaction in Ethiopia.

2 Methods

2.1 Study Setting and Search Strategies

The current study was conducted to determine the aggregated prevalence and determinants of job satisfaction of healthcare professionals in Ethiopia. It is reported as per the established standard which is Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-analysis (Page et al. 2021). CoCoPop (Condition: job satisfaction; Context: Ethiopia; and Population: healthcare professionals) was used to find eligible studies. It is a recommended tool for systematic review of prevalence studies (Munn et al. 2014). Potential studies were identified through a search in PubMed, Hinari, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Cross-references and links were used to additionally search potential studies. English language restriction was employed to include studies. The clerking of databases was done from 23 to 26 February 2022. Medical subject heading (MeSH) terms of Healthcare professionals AND Job satisfaction AND Ethiopia were used in different combinations. Free full text, human species and studies conducted from 2010 to 26 February 2022 were used to narrow potential studies to be included. The research registry registration was done with registry identification of reviewregistry1648 and it can be accessed by the following link: https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analyses/registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analysesdetails/648060ea133ae2002803a021/.

2.2 Inclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria were original studies reported the prevalence of job satisfaction and/or studies reported determinants of job satisfaction, studies published in English from Ethiopia from 1 January 2010 to 26 February 2022.

2.3 Exclusion Criteria

Studies that failed to report outcome variables were excluded. Studies whose full texts were not available and were unable to receive full text from the authors within 2 weeks were excluded.

2.4 Study Selection and Data Collection

Database search results were combined, and duplicate articles were removed using Endnote (Version 8) and manually. The eligibility assessment was performed independently by four reviewers (D.T., D.Z., S.H. and E.F). Discrepancies between the four reviewers in this process were discussed with the review team until a consensus was reached. Articles identified through electronic literature searches and from other sources were comprehensively reviewed based on the eligibility criteria for inclusion.

2.5 Outcome Measurement

The aggregated prevalence and determinants of job satisfaction of healthcare professionals in Ethiopia were our variables of interest.

2.6 Quality Assessment and Data Extraction

The modified Newcastle–Ottawa appraisal assessment tool (Peterson et al. 2011) was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Three authors (D.T., B.C. and E.F.) evaluated the quality of included studies independently. The disagreements arising were resolved by evaluating and discussing with the three authors together. Accordingly, all included studies in this study were graded as high quality, which means they scored ≥ six out of nine (Table 1).

TABLE 1. Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis of job satisfaction of healthcare professionals in Ethiopia, 2022.
First author, publication year Study area Study design Study population Sample size Satisfaction (%) Quality status
Ayalew et al. (2019) Bahir Dar Cross-sectional Nurses 220 43.6 High quality
Ayalew et al. (2019) In all public health facilities of Ethiopia Cross-sectional Nurses 424 60.8 High quality
Ayele et al. (2020) In public hospitals located in eastern Ethiopia Cross-sectional Pharmacists 220 32.7 High quality
Bekru et al. (2017) In health facilities in Addis Ababa city Cross-sectional Midwives 221 52.9 High quality
Deriba et al. 2017 (32) At public health centers in West Ethiopia Cross-sectional All Healthcare professionals 308 41.46 High quality
Gedif et al. (2018) At the University of Gondar Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia Cross-sectional All Healthcare professionals 383 54 High quality
Geleto et al. 2015 (34) At public health institutions in Harari region, eastern Ethiopia Cross-sectional All Healthcare professionals 405 44.2 High quality
Merga and Fufa (2019) In Bale Zone Public Health Facilities, eastern Ethiopia Cross-sectional All Healthcare professionals 422 38.5 High quality
Semachew et al. (2017) In Ethiopian public hospitals Cross-sectional Nurses 316 68.4 High quality
Temesgen et al. 2018 (18) At Western Amhara Region of Ethiopia Cross-sectional All Healthcare professionals 575 31.7 High quality
Yami et al. (2011) In Jimma university specialised hospital, southwest Ethiopia Cross-sectional All Healthcare professionals 145 41.4 High quality
Yilkal Fentie et al. (2018) In Amhara National Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia Cross-sectional Anaesthetists 98 46.9 High quality

Year of publication along with author's name, study (quality, area, design and sample size) and main findings of the studies like the magnitude of job satisfaction and its determinants were extracted. Searching results and their references are reviewed by seven authors (D.T., M.C., M.H., W.A., D.M., B.G. and E.F.) independently. The disagreements arising to include studies were resolved by evaluating and discussing with all authors.

2.7 Statistical Analysis

The Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and STATA version 16.0 software were used for data management. The aggregated prevalence of job satisfaction and its determinants were analysed by the ‘Der Simonian and Laird random-effects meta-analysis (random-effects model)’ (Kelley and Kelley 2012). The aggregated adjusted odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval for associated factors of included studies were computed. Forest plots and tables were used to depict the findings.

2.8 Heterogeneity and Publication Bias

The I2 statistic test was done to determine the heterogeneity of included studies (Deeks et al. 2019). The finding was highly heterogeneous (heterogeneity I2 > 75%). To minimise heterogeneity and identify its source, subgroup analyses were done. Again, to differentiate the outlier articles, sensitivity analysis was done. The funnel plot, Egger test and p-value < 0.05 were employed to declare publication bias (Peters et al. 2006).

3 Results

3.1 Search Strategy

In the current study, published articles on the prevalence and associated factors of job satisfaction in Ethiopia were included. An overall of 3628 articles were found as a search result. In total, 1502 articles after similar studies were removed were further screened and 1487 articles were excluded. Only 15 articles were left and three research studies were excluded for reasons. Finally, 12 were used for qualitative and quantitative synthesis (Moher et al. 2009) (Figure 1).

Details are in the caption following the image
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram showing search strategies.

3.2 Characteristics of Included Studies

This study used 12 studies with a total number of 3736 healthcare professionals. The job satisfaction among the included studies varied from 31.7% (Temesgen et al. 2018) to 68.4% (Semachew et al. 2017). Regarding study design, only cross-sectional design was employed. Furthermore, concerning the study population, six studies were conducted on all healthcare professionals, while the remaining three studies were conducted on nurses. A single study focused on pharmacists, midwives and anaesthetists (Table 1).

3.3 Meta-Analysis

3.3.1 Publication Bias

A funnel plot (Figure 2) and Egger's regression test (Peters et al. 2006; Sterne et al. 2005) depicted that there was no publication bias seen between the studies (egger's regression test p-value =0.7497).

Details are in the caption following the image
Funnel plot to test publication bias of included studies.

3.3.2 The Aggregated Prevalence of Job Satisfaction Among Healthcare Professionals

The pooled prevalence of satisfaction in this study was found to be 43.42% with 95% CI (37.65, 49.19). Heterogeneity was significant across the included studies (I2 = 92.46%, p = 0.00) (Figure 3).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot showing the pooled estimate of job satisfaction among healthcare professionals.

3.3.3 Subgroup Analysis

Subgroup analysis was done by using the type of healthcare professionals (nurses, midwives, pharmacists, anaesthetists, and all healthcare professionals) and sample size. The highest proportion of job satisfaction was observed in studies that had a sample size of > 300, with 44.44% and a CI of (35.23, 51.65) (Figure 4). Based on the type of profession, the highest proportion of job satisfaction was seen in midwives, with a proportion of 52.90% (46.32, 59.48), and the lowest proportion of job satisfaction was seen in pharmacists, 32.70% (26.50, 38.90) (Ayele et al. 2020). The pooled prevalence of job satisfaction in studies that include all healthcare professionals was 41.81% (35.19, 48.43), and the pooled prevalence of job satisfaction in studies that include only nurses was 46.01% (28.83, 63.20) (Figure 5).

Details are in the caption following the image
Subgroup analysis of the pooled prevalence of job satisfaction by the sample size category.
Details are in the caption following the image
Subgroup analysis of the magnitude of job satisfaction by the type of professions.

3.4 Sensitivity Analysis

There was no single study that significantly affected the overall estimate (Figure 6).

Details are in the caption following the image
Sensitivity analysis of on the prevalence of job satisfaction of healthcare professionals.

3.4.1 The Effect of Marital Status on the Pooled Estimate of Job Satisfaction of Healthcare Professionals

Two of the overall 12 studies reported the significance of marital status on the satisfaction of healthcare professionals. Further, the combined effect sizes of these two different studies (Bekru et al. 2017; Gedif et al. 2018) showed that married healthcare professionals were 1.3 times more likely to be gratified compared to those who were not married (AOR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.60), (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.322) (Figure 7).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot for the association between marital status and job satisfaction.

3.4.2 The Effect of Recognition on the Pooled Estimate of Job Satisfaction of Healthcare Professionals

Three (Ayalew and Workineh 2019; Ayalew et al. 2019; Deriba et al. 2017) studies reported the significance of recognition on the job satisfaction of healthcare professionals. Having good recognition was positively associated with job satisfaction in healthcare professions as compared with its counterpart (AOR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.54), (I2 = 58.9%, p = 0.088) (Figure 8).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot for the association between recognition and job satisfaction.

3.4.3 The Effect of Remuneration on the Pooled Estimate of Job Satisfaction of Healthcare Professionals

Four studies reported the significance of recognition on the job satisfaction of healthcare professionals. The pooled effect sizes of these four different studies (Ayalew et al. 2019; Deriba et al. 2017; Gedif et al. 2018; Merga and Fufa 2019) showed that having good remuneration is significantly associated with job satisfaction (AOR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.61), (Figure 9).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot for the association between remuneration and job satisfaction.

3.4.4 The Effect of Supervision on the Pooled Estimate of Job Satisfaction of Healthcare Professionals

From random-effects model estimates, the pooled odds of having adequate supervision among healthcare professionals were 1.4 times more likely to be satisfied compared to their counterparts (AOR: 1.44, 95% CI, 1.14, 1.83), (Figure 10).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot for the association between supervision and job satisfaction.

3.4.5 The Effect of Work Security on the Pooled Estimate of Job Satisfaction of Healthcare Professionals

Having good work security of the participant has a significant effect on healthcare professionals' satisfaction. Those participants having good work security were 1.6 times more likely to be satisfied as compared to those who did not have good work security (AOR: 1.63 95% CI, 1.13, 2.35) (Figure 11).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot for the association between work security and job satisfaction.

3.4.6 The Effect of Work Experience on the Pooled Estimate of Job Satisfaction of Healthcare Professionals

From random-effects model estimates, the work experience was not associated with job satisfaction of healthcare professionals (AOR: 1.17 95% CI, 0.63, 2.18) (Figure 12).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot for the association between work experience and job satisfaction.

3.4.7 The Effect of Workload on the Pooled Estimate of Job Satisfaction of Healthcare Professionals

From random-effects model estimates, the workload was not associated with the job satisfaction of healthcare professionals (AOR: 0.93 95% CI, 0.24, 3.59), (Figure 13).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot for the association between workload and job satisfaction.

3.4.8 The Effect of Working Unit on the Pooled Estimate of Job Satisfaction of Healthcare Professionals

From random-effects model estimates, the working unit was not associated with the job satisfaction of healthcare professionals (AOR: 1.13 95% CI, 0.67, 1.90) (Figure 14).

Details are in the caption following the image
Forest plot for the association between working unit and job satisfaction.

4 Discussion

This study was conducted to estimate the aggregated prevalence of job satisfaction of healthcare professionals and associated factors in Ethiopia. The aggregated prevalence of job satisfaction was 43.42% (95% CI: 37.65, 49.19). The pooled prevalence of job satisfaction among healthcare professionals in this study was in line with the studies done in Iran 43.6% (Amiresmaili and Moosazadeh 2013) and in Sudan 41% (Suliman et al. 2017). This low level of job satisfaction might be due to workload, poor leadership quality, poor work–life balance, poor relationship with colleagues or supervisors and poor motivational factors including incentives.

The finding of this study was higher than studies done in Korea 28.1% (Park and Lee 2018) and Pakistan 18% (Tasneem et al. 2018). This might be due to differences in the study population (nurses only) and a small sample size of only 256 in Korea and Pakistan as compared to the current study. While the findings of this study are lower than the study done in Nepal 76% (Chaulagain and Khadka 2012), the discrepancy might be due to the variation in health policy and economic status; as Nepal has a better economy, they may invest more in the health sector and health professionals.

The pooled prevalence of job satisfaction among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia by professions was 53% in midwives (Bekru et al. 2017), 42% in studies that include all healthcare professionals (Deriba et al. 2017; Gedif et al. 2018; Geleto et al. 2015; Merga and Fufa 2019; Temesgen et al. 2018; Yami et al. 2011), 47% in anaesthetists (Yilkal Fentie et al. 2018), 46% in nurses (Ayalew and Workineh 2019; Ayalew et al. 2019; Semachew et al. 2017) and 33% in pharmacists (Ayele et al. 2020). The higher pooled prevalence of job satisfaction among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia by sample size category was observed in studies that had a sample size greater than 300 (Ayalew and Workineh 2019; Deriba et al. 2017; Gedif et al. 2018; Geleto et al. 2015; Merga and Fufa 2019; Semachew et al. 2017; Temesgen et al. 2018) was 43% with a CI of (35, 52).

This meta-analysis showed that being married, healthcare professionals, having good recognition, good remuneration, adequate supervision and good work security were positively associated with job satisfaction of healthcare professionals as compared to their counterparts, while working unit and workload failed to associate with job satisfaction. This result is in line with studies done in Pakistan, Nepal and Australia (Chaulagain and Khadka 2012; Kluger et al. 2003; Tasneem et al. 2018). This similarity might be due to having good recognition, good remuneration, adequate supervision and good work security creating good motivation for staff that leads to good working conditions and satisfaction. This result is not similar to studies done in Serbia and South Africa (Kuburović et al. 2016; Ramasodi 2012). The dissimilarity might be due to differences in equipping health sectors, as these countries have better socio-economic status than Ethiopia.

4.1 Limitation

The limitation of this study is that all included studies employed a cross-sectional study design, and there is also significant heterogeneity among included studies, which might cause difficulty in establishing a temporal relationship between the healthcare professionals' job satisfaction and its determinants.

5 Conclusion

Poor healthcare professional job satisfaction has to be strategically halted by all stakeholders as the finding of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed a low level of job satisfaction which is less than 50%. It would be very difficult to have a productive health professional without maintaining their satisfaction with their job.

Author Contributions

All authors substantially performed the literature search, assessment of articles, data extraction, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the manuscript and agreed to publication.

Acknowledgements

Debre Tabor University for providing internet service.

    Ethics Statement

    The authors have nothing to report.

    Consent

    The authors have nothing to report.

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.