Volume 49, Issue 7 pp. 698-704
Basic Science

In vitro comparison of renal stone laser treatment using fragmentation and popcorn technique

Paul Klaver

Corresponding Author

Paul Klaver

Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Correspondence to: Paul Klaver, MSc, Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, Intern Post C01.230, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Tjeerd de Boorder

Tjeerd de Boorder

Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Alex I. Rem

Alex I. Rem

Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Tycho M. T. W. Lock

Tycho M. T. W. Lock

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands

Department of Urology, Central Military Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Herke Jan Noordmans

Herke Jan Noordmans

Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 April 2017
Citations: 17
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

Abstract

Objective

To study the effectiveness of two laser techniques clinically used to fragment renal stones: fragmenting technique (FT) and popcorn technique (PT).

Methods

Phantom stones were placed in a test tube filled with water, mimicking a renal calyx model. A Holmium:YAG laser was used for fragmentation using both techniques. Four series of experiments were performed with two parameters: the technique (FT or PT) and the number of stones in the test tube (one or four). The mass decrease of the phantom stones was measured before, during, and after the experiment to quantify the effect of both techniques.

Results

Visualization of PT showed that the main effect of PT takes place, when the stone moves in front of the laser fiber and is subject to direct radiant exposure. Both FT and PT resulted in a decrease in stone weight; the mass decrease of the stones subjected to FT exceeded that of the stones subjected to PT, even with less laser energy applied. This difference in mass decrease was evident in both the experiments with one and four stones.

Conclusions

PT was less effective in decreasing stone weight compared with FT. The FT is more effective regarding the applied energy than PT, even in a shorter time period and regardless of the number of stones. This study suggests that FT is to be preferred over PT, when stones are accessible by the laser fiber. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:698–704, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.