Volume 41, Issue 1 e13217
RAPID COMMUNICATION
Open Access

Disparities in cardiac arrest mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: A US-based epidemiological analysis

Mahek Shahid MD

Mahek Shahid MD

Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Hoang Nhat Pham MD

Corresponding Author

Hoang Nhat Pham MD

Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Correspondence

Hoang Nhat Pham, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Tucson, UA College of Medicine, 6th Floor, Room 6336, 1501 N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Ramzi Ibrahim MD

Ramzi Ibrahim MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Enkhtsogt Sainbayar DO

Enkhtsogt Sainbayar DO

Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mahmoud Abdelnabi MBBCh, MSc

Mahmoud Abdelnabi MBBCh, MSc

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Girish Pathangey MD

Girish Pathangey MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Amitoj Singh MD

Amitoj Singh MD

Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 January 2025
Citations: 1

Mahek Shahid and Hoang Nhat Pham contributed equally to the study.

Abstract

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases cardiac arrest (CA) risk because of renal and cardiovascular interactions.

Methods

Using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data from 1999 to 2020, we analyzed CKD-related CA mortality and the impact of social vulnerability index (SVI).

Results

We identified 336 494 CKD-related CA deaths, with stable age-adjusted mortality rates over time. Disparities were observed across gender, racial/ethnic, and geographic subpopulations, with higher mortality among males, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black populations, and those in urban and Western regions. Higher SVI correlated with increased mortality.

Conclusions

CKD-related CA mortality rates are stable, with disparities across demographics; higher SVI correlates with increased mortality, highlighting needed interventions.

1 INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of cardiac arrest (CA) because of the interplay between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular complications. As CKD progresses, the incidence of CA rises, contributing to 60% of cardiac deaths among patients undergoing dialysis.1, 2 The pathophysiology underlying this elevated risk is multifactorial, involving electrolyte imbalances, sympathetic overactivity, inflammation, and iron deposition, all of which can predispose to arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities.1 Structural heart changes and electrophysiological alterations also contribute to the increased risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and CA in patients with CKD.3

Social determinants of health (SDoH) further complicate morbidity and mortality associated with kidney disease and CA. SDoH are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age, which can significantly impact health outcomes. These determinants include nonmedical factors, such as education, economic stability, healthcare access and quality, social and community context, neighborhood and built environment, and systemic biases.4 The social vulnerability index (SVI), a SDoH tool developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has been shown to impact cardiovascular disease prognosis.4 This tool is a quantitative measure that includes characteristics of population-level socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial/ethnic minority status, and housing type and transportation. Our study evaluated disparities and impact of the SVI on CA mortality related to CKD in the United States (US).

2 METHODS

We queried US mortality and demographic data between 1999 and 2020 from CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database utilizing ICD-10 codes CKD (N18.X) and CA (I46.X, I49.0) within the multiple causes-of-death files. The CDC WONDER database is a comprehensive public health resource that compiles data from national surveys, vital statistics, and disease registries, capturing over 99% of all deaths in the United States to enable the analysis of population health trends.5 As defined by ICD-10 code, CKD is classified as N18.X and refers to a disorder marked by the gradual and typically permanent loss of kidney function, leading to renal failure. CA is defined by two ICD-10 codes, I46.X and I49.0, which refers to a disorder characterized by cessation of the pumping function of the heart.6 Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100 000 and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the Direct Standardization method, standardized to the 2000 US population.

The CDC's SVI measures the vulnerability of communities by analyzing 16 social factors grouped into four main domains. These domains capture key aspects, such as socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation. Each area of residence is assigned a percentile ranking for each of the four domains and an overall combined ranking (Table 1). The scores range from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates the least socially vulnerable communities and 1 indicates the most socially vulnerable. The SVI is based on 5-year estimates of data collected from the American Community Survey.4 The 2020 SVI data were categorized into four quartiles, from the lowest Q1 (least vulnerable) to the highest Q4 (most vulnerable) and linked to mortality data using county codes. Log-linear regression was used to analyze temporal trends of AAMR by identifying the fewest significant joint points. Mortality between Q1 and Q4 SVI quartiles in the overall population was compared by logistic regression. Average annual percentage change (AAPC) was calculated by averaging of the annual percentage changes (APC), which were determined through Monte-Carlo permutation tests. We estimated the excess AAMR attributable to COVID-19 by comparing the projected AAMR for 2020, calculated based on 1999–2019 trends, with the actual AAMR in 2020. Two-tailed t-tests were utilized to assess significant changes in the APC, with p < .05 indicating significance. Institutional Review Board approval was not needed as it involved deidentified and publicly available data regarding nonliving humans.

TABLE 1. Social vulnerability index. The 16 social characteristics, under four themes, that are included in the social vulnerability ranking system.
Housing type and transportation Racial and ethnic minority status (one of the below) Household characteristics Socioeconomic status
Crowding Hispanic or Latino (of any race) Aged 17 or younger No health insurance
No vehicle Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Aged 65 or older Housing cost burden
Mobile homes American Indian and Alaska Native Single-parent households Unemployed
Multi-unit structures Black and African American English language proficiency Below 150% poverty
Group quarters Other races (not Hispanic or Latino) Civilian with a disability No high school diploma

3 RESULTS

A total of 336 494 CA deaths in the setting of CKD were identified. AAMR remained steady at 4.64 (95% CI, 4.56–4.72) in 1999 to 4.79 (95% CI, 4.72–4.86) in 2020, despite an isolated AAMR spike to 6.82 (95% CI, 6.74–6.91) between 2011 and 2012 (Graphical abstract). Cumulative AAMR during our 22-year study period was 4.57 (95% CI, 4.56–4.59), with an AAPC of −0.26% (95% CI, −1.46–0.96, p = .66).

Males (AAMR 5.95 [95% CI, 5.92–5.98]) had higher mortality than females (AAMR 3.60 [95% CI, 3.58–3.62]). Mortality was higher among Hispanic populations (AAMR 7.54 [95% CI, 7.46–7.61]) compared with non-Hispanic (NH) populations (AAMR 4.32 [95% CI, 4.30–4.34]). Mortality was highest among NH Black populations (AAMR 11.03 [95% CI, 10.95–11.11]), followed by NH American Indian/Alaska Native (AAMC 7.10 [95% CI, 6.83–7.37]), NH Asian/Pacific Islander (AAMR 6.32 [95% CI, 6.23–6.42]), and NH White (AAMR 3.38 [95% CI, 3.36–3.39]) populations. Notably, the CA-related mortality in NH Black population with CKD (AAPC −1.56% per year, p = .01) declined significantly between 1999 and 2020, compared with their White counterparts (AAPC +0.18% per year, p = .75).

Mortality was higher among urban regions (AAMR 4.76 [95% CI, 4.74–4.77]) than rural regions (AAMR 3.70 [95% CI, 3.67–3.73]). Western US regions (AAMR 6.70 [95% CI, 6.66–6.74]) had the highest mortality rates in the United States, followed by Northeastern (AAMR 5.53 [95% CI, 5.49–5.57]), Southern (AAMR 3.96 [95% CI, 3.94–3.99]), and Midwestern (AAMR 2.61 [95% CI, 2.58–2.63]) regions. Mortality trends are presented in Table 2. Mortality in Q4 (AAMR 6.39 [95% CI, 6.36–6.42]) was higher compared with Q1 (AAMR 2.30 [95% CI, 2.27–2.33], p < .001), with higher SVI accounting for 4.09 excess deaths per 100 000 person-years. During the first pandemic year, deaths exceeded projections by 12.43%, with notable increases in females (13.25%), Hispanic (16.93%), NH Asian (18.74%), and NH Black (16.80%) population with CKD, as well as those in urban areas (12.60%) and the Northeast region (14.11%) (Table 3).

TABLE 2. Joinpoint analysis. CA mortality trends in population with CKD in the United States between 1999 and 2020.
Joinpoint segment Duration APC (95% CI) APC p value AAPC (95% CI) AAPC p value
Overall
1 1999–2020 −0.26 [−1.46–0.96] .66 −0.26 [−1.46–0.96] .66
Gender
Female
1 1999–2020 −0.47 [−1.76–0.85] .47 −0.47 [−1.76–0.85] .47
Male
1 1999–2020 −0.18 [−1.28–0.94] .74 −0.18 [−1.28–0.94] .74
Ethnicity
Hispanic
1 1999–2020 −2.23 [−3.61 to −0.83] .003 −2.23 [−3.61 to −0.83] .003
Non-Hispanic
1 1999–2020 −0.26 [−1.36–0.86] .63 −0.26 [−1.36–0.86] .63
Race
NH Black
1 1999–2020 −1.56 [−2.70 to −0.40] .01 −1.56 [−2.70 to −0.40] .01
NH White
1 1999–2020 0.18 [−0.99–1.37] .75 0.18 [−0.99–1.37] .75
NH Asian
1 1999–2009 −3.80 [−5.42 to −2.15] <.001 −2.85 [−6.32–0.75] .12
2 2009–2012 13.26 [−5.90–36.32] .17
3 2012–2015 −24.03 [−37.77 to −7.24] .01
4 2015–2020 4.74 [0.68–8.96] .03
NH native
1 1999–2020 −0.52 [−1.75–0.72] .39 −0.52 [−1.75–0.72] .39
Census region
Northeast
1 1999–2020 −1.03 [−1.94 to −0.10] .03 −1.03 [−1.94 to −0.10] .03
Midwest
1 1999–2020 1.49 [0.27–2.74] .02 1.49 [0.27–2.74] .02
South
1 1999–2020 −0.33 [−1.34–0.70] .51 −0.33 [−1.34–0.70] .51
West
1 1999–2020 −0.47 [−2.03–1.12] .55 −0.47 [−2.03–1.12] .55
Urbanization
Urban
1 1999–2020 −0.32 [−1.57–0.95] .60 −0.32 [−1.57–0.95] .60
Rural
1 1999–2020 0.63 [−0.39–1.67] .21 0.63 [−0.39–1.67] .21
Social vulnerability index
Quartile 1
1 1999–2020 0.74 [−0.49–1.99] .22 0.74 [−0.49–1.99] .22
Quartile 2
1 1999–2020 0.08 [−0.96–1.13] .88 0.08 [−0.96–1.13] .88
Quartile 3
1 1999–2020 −0.13 [−1.36–1.13] .84 −0.13 [−1.36–1.13] .84
Quartile 4
1 1999–2020 −0.34 [−1.54–0.87] .56 −0.34 [−1.54–0.87] .56
  • Abbreviations: AAPC, average annual percentage change; APC, annual percentage change; CA, cardiac arrest; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; NH, non-Hispanic; SVI, social vulnerability index.
TABLE 3. Estimated excess death. Estimated excess death and percentage excess mortality rate in 2020 in comparison with 1999–2019 period.
AAPC 1999–2019 Projected AAMR 2020 Actual AAMR 2020 % excess AAMR 2020 Estimated excess death 2020
All −0.37 4.19 4.79 12.43% 2458
Female −0.55 3.19 3.68 13.25% 1130
Male −0.29 5.50 6.24 11.79% 1327
Hispanic −2.46 5.76 6.94 16.93% 485
Non-Hispanic −0.34 4.03 4.55 11.51% 1940
NH Black −1.74 8.90 10.7 16.80% 742
NH White 0.12 3.28 3.55 7.49% 835
NH Asian −3.48 4.27 5.25 18.74% 207
NH Native −0.58 6.85 7.14 4.06% 8
Urban −0.41 4.28 4.9 12.60% 2136
Rural 0.50 3.82 4.28 10.77% 304
NE −1.22 4.87 5.67 14.11% 619
Midwest 1.28 2.96 3.38 12.50% 368
South −0.37 3.54 3.96 10.69% 660
West −0.52 5.93 6.75 12.16% 764

4 DISCUSSION

Our analysis of CKD and CA identified disparities based on gender, race/ethnicity, and geographic populations, with SVI significantly contributing to excess mortality. The composite temporal trend in mortality remained stable over time, contrasting with the declining trend of CA-related mortality observed in the general population.7 This may reflect insufficient adoption of risk factor management and low utility of standardized CKD management in vulnerable populations, despite advancements in guidelines over the last two decades.8 The temporary rise in CKD-related CA mortality during the early 2010s could be attributable to healthcare access barriers, such as those following the 2008 financial crisis, before improvements under the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.9, 10 Prior epidemiological data has shown CKD is more prevalent in females, but experience less CVD than males at all stages of CKD.11 Our analysis revealed that males with CKD had 65% higher mortality from CA compared with females. This disparity may result from more rapid progression of CKD in males,12 who also have a greater burden of CKD risk factors like hypertension.11

Excess mortality related to social vulnerability aligns with previous studies, such as the REGARDS sub-study, which showed that household poverty was independently associated with kidney disease across both Black and White populations.13 Additionally, Black and Hispanic individuals with CKD have lower life expectancy than their White counterparts, often due to neighborhood socioeconomic status and limited access to resources, such as hemodialysis facilities or health insurance.14 This disparity leads to delay in diagnosis and treatment which could exacerbate comorbidities and increase the risk of CVD.15 Additionally, genetic variations also play a significant role in the racial disparities in CA-related mortality among Hispanic and Black individuals with CKD. For example, variants in the apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene have been shown to confer risk for CKD development and progression. Black patients with two APOL1 risk alleles have a significantly higher risk of CKD progression and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared to those with zero or one risk allele, with a 1.49-fold increased risk of CKD and a 1.88-fold increased risk of ESRD.16, 17 Other genetic factors associated CA, such as ion channelopathies and inherited cardiovascular diseases, also exhibit racial disparities, with African American/Black individuals being disproportionately affected.18 Interestingly, our analysis showed that the CA-related mortality gap between Black and White patients with CKD during study period, mainly stemming from significant decline in mortality in Black populations. This overall decreasing trend was likely due to increased health access, which promotes better management of risk factors, earlier detection of CKD, and long-term management of this chronic disease. Shifts in the insurance market have also allowed for more patients to qualify for dialysis treatments via expanded private or public insurance coverage.19

Urban communities experienced greater CA mortality compared with rural communities, likely due to urban infrastructure that fails to promote physical activity and increased environmental stressors. This may lead to poor cardiometabolic heath in disadvantaged neighborhoods within metropolitan regions.20, 21 On the contrary, rural communities have been shown to have reduced access to health care and delays in evaluation and treatment.22 Prior study showed that rural patients with out-of-hospital CA have longer emergency medical services response times, lower odds of achieving return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge compared with urban patients.23 However, pockets within urban communities face this same desert of healthcare facilities compounded with income inequality, decreased social support due to residential structure, increase noise, and air pollution, as well as decreased sleep quality all contributing to increased cardiovascular risk and poor outcomes.24 Despite numerous studies showing that Southern US region bears a heavier CVD burden and subsequent cardiovascular mortality,25 our findings revealed that the Western US regions experienced the highest mortality rates. This emphasizes the necessity for further investigation to understand the connection of lifestyle and environmental factors that contribute to these differences in mortality rates.

Our study indicated excess CA-related in patients with CKD during the first year of pandemic aligned with previously reported increased cardiovascular adverse outcomes attributable to COVID-19.26, 27 This increased mortality could be due to the disruption of medical care with shifting resources to COVID-19 patients, reduced in-center dialysis utilization, and limited bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation due to social distancing measures.26, 28, 29 Additionally, the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on CA mortality among minority population, including Hispanic and Black patients, was likely driven by the exacerbation of existing disparities and worsening of multiple SDOH factors, such as psychosocial stress, food insecurity, and poverty.30

Limitations include misclassification of causes of death, ecological fallacy, and lack of individual-level data and inability to account for different stages of CKD, which may obscure confounding factors. Although these limitations warrant cautious interpretation of our results, the use of nationally representative sample provides a reliable source for assessing trends and disparities in our study. Further research is warranted to contribute to our findings and further explore health inequities.

5 CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed that CKD-related CA mortality rates have remained stable, with notable disparities observed among gender, racial/ethnic, and regional subpopulations. The overall trend indicated that increased SVI correlated with higher mortality rates. These results display the epidemiological inequity in CKD and cardiovascular outcomes, warranting further interventions targeting healthcare disparities.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have no conflict of interest or disclosures.

ETHICS STATEMENT

Institutional Review Board approval was not needed as it involved deidentified and publicly available data regarding nonliving humans.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data used in this study were obtained from an already publicly available database maintained by the CDC (WONDER).

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.