Volume 56, Issue 8 pp. 3959-3973
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Full Access

Origins of the meta-mafic rocks in the southern Dunhuang Block (NW China): Implication for tectonic framework of the southernmost Central Asian Orogenic Belt

Mengyan Shi

Mengyan Shi

School of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China

Search for more papers by this author
Quanlin Hou

Quanlin Hou

College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Chunming Wu

Chunming Wu

College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Quanren Yan

Quanren Yan

College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Nannan Cheng

Corresponding Author

Nannan Cheng

School of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China

Correspondence

Nannan Cheng, School of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Qian W. L. Zhang

Qian W. L. Zhang

College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Hao Y. C. Wang

Hao Y. C. Wang

Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 April 2021
Citations: 4

Handling Editor: Y. Liu

Funding information: Henan Polytechnic University, Grant/Award Number: 760307/018; Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, Grant/Award Number: 2016YFC0600401; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 41730215

Abstract

The Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) is one of the largest accretionary orogenic collages in the world with prominent juvenile crust addition, where the southernmost margin of the CAOB located is one hot topic in the international studies. The Dunhuang Block located to the south of the Beishan Orogen is a key position for outlining the tectonic framework of the south margin of the CAOB. However, at present, the tectonic attribution of the Dunhuang Block is still controversial. In this paper, we focus on the origins and protoliths of the meta-mafic rocks from the Hongliuxia complex in the southern Dunhuang Block for determining the tectonic attribution of the Dunhuang Block. In the field, the meta-mafic rocks are mainly exposed as tectonic blocks within the metasedimentary rocks displaying the “block-in-matrix” fabrics or as tectonic slices juxtaposed by faults. Geochemically, the meta-mafic rocks could be divided into three groups based on the rare earth elements (REE) and trace elements: the group 1 samples are depleted in the LREE relative to HREE and show flat HREE patterns, similar to the mid-oceanic ridge basalt; the group 2 samples show flat REE patterns without obvious differentiation between the LREE and HREE, like the oceanic plateau basalt; the group 3 samples are enriched in LREE relative to LREE, and have negative Nb, Ta, and Ti anomalies, similar to the island arc basalt. Conclusively, the protoliths of the meta-mafic rocks dominantly belong to the oceanic plate components. They were metamorphosed during Early Silurian to Middle Devonian in different depths of the subduction zone documented in previous studies. So, we suggest the Hongliuxia complex is an exhumed Palaeozoic subduction–accretion complex (SAC) formed during the oceanic plate subduction. This result confirms the Palaeozoic subduction event occurred in the Dunhuang region and indicates that the Dunhuang Block is a Palaeozoic Orogen rather than a part of Precambrian continent block. Considering the regional geology context, we speculate the Dunhuang Orogen belongs to the southernmost margin of the CAOB.

1 INTRODUCTION

The Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) is the largest accretionary orogenic belt on Earth, formed by the long-lived subduction–accretion processes of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean (PAO) during the Neoproterozoic to latest Permian or Early Triassic (Şengör, Natal'in, & Burtman, 1993; Windley, Alexeiev, Xiao, Kröner, & Badarch, 2007; Xiao et al., 2015; Xiao, Windley, Hao, & Zhai, 2003). The location of the southernmost margin of the CAOB is a focus of many international studies due to its significance for understanding the tectonic framework of the southern CAOB and continental growth (Şengör & Natal'in, 1996; Windley et al., 2007; Xiao et al., 2015; Xu, Charvet, Chen, Zhao, & Shi, 2013). The Beishan Orogen in the southern part of the CAOB connects the Southern Tien Shan Suture to the west with the Solonker Suture to the east (Xiao et al., 2010). In recent years, many Palaeozoic high-pressure metamorphic rocks, magmatic arcs, and forearc accretion complexes have been identified in the Beishan Orogen, and they were considered as the products of the subduction of the PAO (Guo et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2014; Guo, Chung, Xiao, Hou, & Li, 2017; Liu, Chen, Jahn, Wu, & Liu, 2011; Qu et al., 2011; Song et al., 2013; Song, Xiao, Han, & Tian, 2014; Song, Xiao, Windley, Han, & Lei, 2016; Song, Xiao, Windley, Han, & Tian, 2015; Tian et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2015). These research achievements support the idea that the Beishan Orogen represents the southernmost part of the CAOB in the middle portion of the huge E-W striking accretionary orogen. However, as an important tectonic unit located to the south of the Beishan Orogen, the Dunhuang Block is relatively poorly studied as yet. Particularly, its tectonic attribution is still controversial: (1) some researchers considered it as a fragment of Precambrian continent based on the Precambrian geochronological data (He, Zhang, Zong, & Dong, 2013; Long, Yuan, Sun, Kröner, & Zhao, 2014; Lu, Li, Zhang, & Niu, 2008; Mei et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014; Zhang, Gong, & Yu, 2012; Zhang, Yu, Gong, Li, & Hou, 2013; Zhao et al., 2015; Zhao, Diwu, Sun, Zhu, & Wang, 2013; Zhao, Sun, Diwu, & Yan, 2015; Zong et al., 2013), while (2) others proposed it is a Palaeozoic Orogen on account of the identification of the Palaeozoic magmatic–metamorphic events (Shi et al., 2020; Shi, Hou, Wu, Wang, & Chen, 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2016). This controversy hampers our understanding of the tectonic framework of the southern CAOB and how it extends southward.

The subduction–accretion complexes (SAC) are formed during the subduction of the oceanic plates. Generally, they are characterized by the trench-vergent thrusts, out-of-sequence thrusts, duplexes, fault propagation folds, and “block-in-matrix” fabrics in structures (Anma et al., 2011; Chester & Moore, 2018; Muraoka & Ogawa, 2011). Their compositions predominantly include the rocks derived from the subducting oceanic plate, high-pressure metamorphic rocks, trench turbidites, and materials from the overriding plate (Frisch, Meschede, & Blakey, 2011). Nowadays, it is accepted that the exhumed SACs exposed on land could represent the locations of ancient convergent plate boundaries and document the key information about the consumption of oceanic plates and the formation of orogens (Cawood et al., 2009; Yan et al., 2018).

In the southern Dunhuang Block, many eclogite, granulite, and amphibolite are exposing in the Hongliuxia complex. They record the Silurian–Devonian “clockwise” metamorphism P–T–t paths (Wang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018; Wang, Chen, et al., 2017). They are mainly exposed as tectonic blocks within the metasedimentary rocks (metamorphosed trench turbidites), exhibiting the “block-in-matrix” fabric (Shi et al., 2018). This lithological occurrence is similar to that of the SACs (e.g., Anma et al., 2011; Chester & Moore, 2018; Muraoka & Ogawa, 2011; Yamamoto, Mukoyoshi, & Ogawa, 2005). However, the origins and protoliths of those meta-mafic rocks are poorly constrained, which makes the nature of the Hongliuxia complex still unclear. In this paper, we present field relationships and whole-rock geochemical data of the meta-mafic rocks in the Hongliuxia complex. These data allow us to throw light upon the nature of the Hongliuxia complex and provide evidence for understanding the tectonic attribution of the Dunhuang Block and the tectonic framework of the southern CAOB.

2 GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND

The CAOB is located to the south of the Siberia and East European cratons (Figure 1a). It is the largest Phanerozoic accretionary orogen on Earth with a length of ~2,500 km in the E-W trending (Şengör et al., 1993). The Beishan Orogen is located in the southern part of the CAOB. It is composed of several discrete arc terranes, including the Shibanshan, Shuangyingshan, Mazongshan, Hanshan, and Queershan terranes, separated from south to north by the Liuyuan, Hongliuhe–Xichangjing, Shibanjing–Xiaohuangshan, and Hongshishan ophiolitic mélanges (Xiao et al., 2010). Tectonically, the Dunhaung Block is situated to the south of the Beishan Orogen, connecting the Tarim Craton westerly and Alxa Block (western North China Craton) easterly, respectively (Figure 1b). It is divided into several discrete massifs by Cenozoic ENE–WSW striking faults, including the Sanweishan Massif, Dongbatu–Mogutai Massif, Hongliuxia Massif, and Karatashtag–Duobagou Massif (Figure 1c).

Details are in the caption following the image
Locality maps of regional geology and the study locale. (a) General overview of the (CAOB) and adjacent units (after Şengör et al., 1993; Xiao et al., 2009); (b) Tectonic location of the Dunhuang Block (after Yue, Liou, & Graham, 2001); and (c) Simplified geological map of the Dunhuang Block (after China Geological Survey, 2004); (d) Simplified geological map of Hongliuxia Massif in the southern Dunhuang Block (modified after Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Gansu Province, 1966) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

The Dunhuang Block was traditionally considered as a fragment of the Precambrian continent block. The rocks exposed in this region consist of a series of metamorphic supracrustal rocks and sporadic Archean TTG gneisses (Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Gansu Province, 1989). The Archean TTG gneisses were previously viewed as fragments of the basement of the Tarim Craton (Long et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2008; Mei et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014; Zong et al., 2013) or North China Craton (Zhang et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2013; Zhao, Diwu, et al., 2015; Zhao, Sun, et al., 2015). The metamorphic supracrustal rocks comprise the metasedimentary rock, meta-mafic rock, metavolcanic rock, marble, and minor migmatite. Previously, they were all thought to be formed in the pre-Sinian (Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Gansu Province, 1989). Recently, many meta-mafic rocks metamorphosed in the Early Silurian to Late Devonian are recognized in nearly almost areas of the Dunhuang region (He, Zhang, Zong, Xiang, & Klemd, 2014; Meng, Zhang, Xiang, Yu, & Li, 2011; Peng et al., 2014; Pham et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018; Wang, Chen, et al., 2017; Wang, Wang, et al., 2017; Wang, Zhang, Chen, et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2019; Zong et al., 2012). The similar Palaeozoic metamorphic events are also reported in the neighbouring Beishan Orogen, such as the ~465 Ma HP eclogites west of Liuyuan in Beishan (Liu et al., 2011; Qu et al., 2011).

Palaeozoic–Mesozoic magmatic rocks are also identified in the Dunhuang Block with ages ranging from Cambrian to Triassic. Amongst, the Early Palaeozoic magmatic rocks are considered to be formed in the continental arc environment (Gan, Li, Song, & Li, 2020; Zhao et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2019).The Carboniferous granitoids are ascribed as the collisional intrusions formed by partial melting of the thickened lower crust (Bao et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2016a; Wang et al., 2016b; Zhang, Guo, Zou, Feng, & Li, 2009; Zhao, Sun, Diwu, et al., 2017; Zhu, Wang, Xu, Chen, & Li, 2014). Besides, the Early-Mesozoic magmatic rocks are also distributed in different locations of the Dunhuang Block, which is suggested to be formed by the delamination of thickened continental crust and asthenosphere upwelling in the extension setting (Feng et al., 2018; Wang, Guo, Yu, & Zhang, 2020). The similar Palaeozoic–Mesozoic magmatic rocks are widely identified in the adjacent Beishan–Tianshan Orogen: 438–397 Ma granitoids in Beishan (Liu et al., 2011; Zhang & Guo, 2008; Zhao, Guo, & Wang, 2007), ~ 370 Ma volcanic rocks in the Dundunshan arc, south of Beishan (Guo et al., 2014, 2017), Silurian and Late Devonion granitoids in the central Tianshan (Shi et al., 2007), and Permian–Triassic magmatism in Beishan–Tianshan Orogen (Chen, Shu, & Santosh, 2011; Li et al., 2012; Li, Wang, Wilde, & Tong, 2013; Mao et al., 2014).

The Hongliuxia Massif located in the southern Dunhuang Block (Figure 1d) is occupied by the metamorphic complex mainly consisting of the metasedimentary rocks, meta-mafic rocks and marbles. The metasedimentary rocks are intensely deformed and mostly experienced the greenschist-facies metamorphism (Wang, Wang, et al., 2017). Protoliths of some metasedimentary rocks were trench turbidites deposited after the Middle Devonian (Shi et al., 2018). They enclose the lenticular meta-mafic rocks exhibiting the “block-in-matrix” fabric (Shi et al., 2017). The meta-mafic rocks, including the eclogite, mafic granulite, amphibolite, were mostly metamorphosed in 440 ~ 390 Ma (Wang, Chen, et al., 2017; Wang, Wang, et al., 2017; Wang, Zhang, Chen, et al., 2018). Some of them were metamorphosed from the oceanic island basalt and island arc basalt (Wang et al., 2014; Wang, Wang, et al., 2017). They record metamorphic peak P–T conditions ranging from 830 °C and 24.2 kbar for eclogite to 735–744°C and 17.1–17.7 kbar for mafic granulites, or 652°C and 10.2 kbar for amphibolite (Wang, Chen, et al., 2017; Wang, Wang, et al., 2017; Wang, Zhang, Chen, et al., 2018). The contrast P–T conditions of the meta-mafic rocks and field relationship perhaps evidences the tectonic juxtaposition of the different kinds of rocks. Besides, some granitoid rocks formed in 430 ~ 400 Ma, 360 ~ 340 Ma, and 320 ~ 313 Ma were intruded in the Hongliuxia complex (Wang et al., 2014; Wang, Chen, et al., 2016; Wang, Chen, et al., 2017; Wang, Zhang, Chen, et al., 2018; Zhao, Sun, Diwu, et al., 2017).

3 FIELD RELATIONSHIP AND PETROGRAPHY

3.1 Field relationship

The meta-mafic rocks in the Hongliuxia complex mostly expose as tectonic blocks within the metasedimentary rocks showing the “block-in-matrix” fabric. They are also occurred as tectonic slices juxtaposed with other rocks. In the field, the imbricated thrusts control the distribution of the marble and amphibolite slices and juxtaposed them together (Figures 2a,b). The amphibolite slice could be observed thrusting over the metasandstone slice on the S-dipping fault (Figure 2c). The contact boundaries of different slices are predominantly occupied by ductile shear zones, in which the lineations and σ-type boudins are developed (Figure 2d,e).

Details are in the caption following the image
Meta-mafic rocks exposed as the tectonic slices in the Hongliuxia complex. (a, b) Imbricated thrusts juxtaposed the marble and amphibolite slices together; (c) The amphibolite slice thrust over the metasandstone slice; (d) Lineations developed on the marble; (e) Ductile shear zone developed in the contact boundary between the metasandstone and mica–quartz schist slices [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

The meta-mafic blocks are variable in size and show asymmetric boudin structure defined by competent blocks within ductile matrix. These occurrences reflect the layer-paralleled shearing and even rotation (Figure 3a,b). The eclogite and amphibolite with expose together (Figure 3c) resulting from tectonic juxtaposition of rocks metamorphosed in different depths. The metasedimentary rocks, as the matrix of the meta-mafic blocks, generally intensely deformed and developed tight fold and lineation (Figure 3d,e). The S-C fabric developed in the matrix (Figure 3f) indicates the non-coaxial deformation.

Details are in the caption following the image
Field relationships between the meta-mafic blocks and matrix. (a) Amphibolite boudins in the metasandstone; (b) Lenticular granulite in the mica–quartz schist; (c) Eclogite and amphibolite blocks exposed in the same outcrop-scale view; (d) Inclined tight fold developed in the mica–quartz schist; (e) Lineation defined by the oriented biotite and elongated quartz; (f) Asymmetric overturned fold showing top-to-the-north shear sense [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

3.2 Petrography

The meta-mafic rocks in the Hongliuxia complex mainly consist of the eclogite, granulite, and amphibolite. The primary mineral association of the protoliths of the meta-mafic rocks were changed and replaced by metamorphic minerals (Figure 4a). The granulite generally consists of the garnet, hornblende, plagioclase, quartz and rear clinopyroxene (Figure 4b). The amphibolite could be divided into the garnet-bearing amphibolite made up of the garnet, hornblende, plagioclase, and quartz (Figure 4c), and garnet-free amphibolite composed of the hornblende, plagioclase, and quartz (Figure 4d). The current petrographic characters of the meta-mafic rocks can provide limited information about their protoliths, except for their origination from mafic rocks.

Details are in the caption following the image
Microphotographs showing mineral assemblages and textures of the meta-mafic rocks in the Hongliuxia complex. (a) Granulite, clinopyroxene replaced by garnet, quartz, and plagioclase; (b) Garnet porphyroblasts, hornblende, plagioclase, and quartz in granulite; (c) Garnet-bearing amphibolite comprising the garnet, hornblende, plagioclase, and quartz; (d) Garnet-free amphibolite with hornblende, plagioclase, and quartz. Abbreviations: Bt, biotite; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Grt, garnet; Hbl, hornblende; Pl, plagioclase; Qtz, quartz [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

4 GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE META-MAFIC ROCKS

Twenty-seven meta-mafic rock samples were selected for the whole-rock major and trace element analyses in the Wuhan Sample Solution Analytical Technology Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China. The results are listed in Table A1.

The meta-mafic rocks sampled from the Hongliuxia complex experienced high-grade metamorphism. Generally, the immobile elements such as the high-field-strength elements (HFSE: Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, Ti, Th, and Y), REE, and transition elements (V, Cr, Ni, and Sc) remain unaffected during the metamorphism (e.g., Barnes, Naldrett, & Gorton, 1985; Bédard, 1999; Jochum, Arndt, & Hofmann, 1991; Safonova et al., 2016). Contents of some immobile elements of the samples are slightly changed (Figure 5a–f).

Details are in the caption following the image
Variation degree of immobile elements affected by the metamorphism for the meta-mafic rocks [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Based on the chondrite-normalized REE patterns, the meta-mafic rock samples could be divided into three groups. In the primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams, the three groups of samples also show distinct characteristics.

The group 1 samples are characterized by depletion in LREE relative to HREE [(La/Yb)N = 0.50 ~ 1.04]. They have the flat HREE patterns with total REE abundances of 34.20 ~ 61.93 ppm (Figure 6a). In the primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams, they are depleted in the Th, Nb, Ta with the slightly negative Ti anomaly (Figure 6d). These geochemical features are similar to those of the normal-type mid-ocean ridge basalt (N-MORB). The group 2 samples show flat chondrite-normalized REE patterns without obvious differentiation between the LREE and HREE [(La/Yb)N = 1.01 ~ 1.70] with total REE abundances of 33.48 ~ 101.13 ppm (Figure 6b). In the primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams, they show the flat patterns without significantly variable anomalies of Th, Nb, Ta, and Ti (Figure 6e). These geochemical features are similar to those of the transitional-type mid-ocean ridge basalt (T-MORB). The group 3 samples are enriched in LREE relative to HREE [(La/Yb)N = 1.88 ~ 5.16] with relative flat HREE patterns (Figure 6c). The total REE abundances are between 67.74 ~ 135.45 ppm. In the primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams, they show negative Nb, Ta, and Ti anomalies and higher Th abundance (Figure 6f). These geochemical features are similar to those of the island arc basalt (IAB).

Details are in the caption following the image
Rare earth elements (REE) and trace elements compositions of the meta-mafic rocks. (a-c) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of the meta-mafic rocks; (d-f) Primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagram of the meta-mafic rocks. Chondrite and primitive mantle values, N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB values are from Sun and McDonough (1989). Izu island arc basalt represents the intra-oceanic island arc basalt (after Ishizuka et al., 2015), and Lesser Antilles island arc basalt represents the intra-oceanic island arc basalt developed on the thickened oceanic crust (after Xia & Li, 2019; Du Frane, Turner, Dosseto, & Soest, 2009) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

5 PROTOLITHS OF THE META-MAFIC ROCKS

5.1 Group 1 samples

The group 1 samples have geochemical composition of tholeiitic basalt (Figure 7). Their chondrite-normalized REE patterns and primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams show N-MORB affinity. So, it is speculated that the protoliths of the group 1 samples are the products of the partial melting of the depleted asthenosphere beneath the mid-ocean ridge. This interpretation is also supported by the plotting of immobile elements diagrams (Figure 8), in which most samples plot into the N-MORB field.

Details are in the caption following the image
Immobile elements diagrams for rock classification. (a) Nb/Y-Zr/TiO2 diagram (after Winchester & Floyd, 1977); (b) Co–Th diagram (after Hastie, Kerr, Pearce, & Mitchell, 2007) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Details are in the caption following the image
Immobile elements diagrams for tectonic setting. (a) Hf–Ta–Th diagram (after Wood, 1980), IAT: Island Arc Tholeiites, CAB: Calc-alkaline Arc Basalts, OIB: Oceanic Island Basalts, N-MORB: N-type MORB, E-MORB: E-type MORB, WPTB: Within-Plate Tholeiitic Basalts, WPAB: Within-Plate Alkaline Basalts; (b) Nb/Yb-Th/Yb diagram (after Pearce & Peate, 1995) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

5.2 Group 2 samples

The group 2 samples have geochemical composition of calc-alkaline basalt (Figure 7). They also have the transitional MORB-like REE patterns and flat primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams resembling the oceanic plateau basalts (e.g., Xia & Li, 2019). In immobile elements diagrams (Figure 8), most samples plot into the transitional MORB and within-plate basalt fields. Some samples plot into the “Volcanic Arc” array (Figure 8b), but the absence of negative Nb, Ta, Ti anomalies in the primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams may exclude their subduction-related origins. So, it is suggested that protoliths of group 2 samples are possible the components of the oceanic plateau formed in the within-oceanic plate setting.

5.3 Group 3 samples

The group 3 samples have geochemical composition of calc-alkaline basalt and basaltic andesite (Figure 7). Their chondrite-normalized REE patterns and primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams are very similar to those of the island arc basalts, except for the relative higher total REE abundances. In immobile elements diagrams, most samples plot into the “Volcanic Arc” array (Figure 8). Some samples are closely the E-MORB and within-plate tholeiitic basalt (WPTB) fields. These geochemical features probably reflect the effect of subduction process during their formation (Sun & McDonough, 1989). So, it is assumed that the protoliths of this group samples are generated by partial melting of the mantle wedge above the intra-oceanic subduction zone.

Conclusively, the protoliths of the meta-mafic rocks in the Hongliuxia complex include the tholeiitic basalt, calc-alkaline basalt, and basaltic andesite. They are formed in the different tectonic settings in the oceanic plate, including the mid-oceanic ridge, intra-oceanic subduction zone, and the oceanic plateau.

6 DISCUSSION

6.1 Nature of the Hongliuxia complex

In the subduction zone, the subducted materials experienced diachronous metamorphic evolutions would be exhumed facilitated by the corner-flow, buoyancy force, thrusting, and underplating in the interface of subducting and overriding plates (e.g., Cloos & Shreve, 1988a, 1988b; Ernst, 2006; Gerya, Stöckhert, & Perchuk, 2002; Guillot, Hattori, de Sigoyer, Nägler, & Auzende, 2001; Gurnis, Hall, & Lavier, 2004; Hashimoto & Kimura, 1999; Hermann, Müntener, & Scambelluri, 2000; Stöckhert & Gerya, 2005; Taira, 2001). The thrusting and underplating processes could result in the development of imbricated faults and duplexes. Meanwhile, the competent bodies enclosed in the relative soft matrix are expected to undergo boudinage, lenticularization even re-aggregation to form the pinch-and-swell structure or block-in-matrix fabric (e.g., Malatesta, Crispini, Federico, Capponi, & Scambelluri, 2012). This peculiar field structural features and lithological associations would be documented in the exhumed SACs on land (e.g., Anma et al., 2011; Chester & Moore, 2018; Kusky et al., 2013; Muraoka & Ogawa, 2011; Rowe, Moore, Remitti, & Scientists, 2013; Shervais & Choi, 2012; Yamamoto et al., 2005).

In this study, our new field structures data reveal that the Hongliuxia complex in the southern Dunhuang Block is characterized by the stack of tectonic slices, imbricated thrusts, ductile shear zones, asymmetric folds and “block-in-matrix” fabric. Furthermore, the meta-mafic rocks, exposed as slices and tectonic blocks, are mostly originated from the components of the oceanic plate (this study and Wang, Wang, et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2014). They mostly record “clockwise” P–T–t paths but heterogeneous peak metamorphic P–T conditions (Wang, Wang, et al., 2017), and are enclosed within the in situ trench turbidites exhibiting the block-in-matrix fabric (Shi et al., 2018). These facts indicate that they have experienced the tectonic process of subduction-metamorphism-exhumation. So, we suggest the Hongliuxia complex is an exhumed SAC on land, which developed during the oceanic plate subduction process originally.

6.2 Evolution of the Hongliuxia SAC

The SACs formed in the subduction zone generally have a long-lived evolutional history. Its beginning age will not be earlier than the subduction initiation. However, as the subduction initiation is still limited understood (Gurnis et al., 2004; Korenaga, 2013; Stern, 2004; Stern & Gerya, 2018; Wakita, Nakagawa, Sakata, Tanaka, & Oyama, 2018), this age is difficult to constrain. The termination age of the evolution of SACs will not be later than the end of oceanic plate subduction. But, as the continuous process from the oceanic plate subduction to continental collision would not record direct evidence to constrain the ending time of oceanic plate subduction (Li et al., 1999), it is difficult to constrain the termination age as well. Consequently, the timing of a SAC we can obtain in practices, in fact, is a time bucket between its real beginning and termination ages.

The earliest subduction metamorphism event happened at ca. 435 Ma in the Hongliuxia SAC (Wang, Zhang, Chen, et al., 2018), which indicates the subduction initiation predated the Early Silurian. This speculation is supported by the earliest arc-affinity magmatism that took place in ca. 440 Ma in the Sanweishan arc to the north of the Hongliuxia SAC (Shi et al., 2020; Wang, Wu, et al., 2016a; Zhang et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2019; Zhao, Sun, Diwu, et al., 2017). Some of the trench turbidite matrices in the Hongliuxia SAC were deposited posterior to 389 Ma (Shi et al., 2018), which means that the oceanic plate subduction in the Hongliuxia area had not finished at Middle Devonian. This is also supported by the ca. 390 Ma subduction metamorphism reported in the Hongliuxia SAC (Wang, Wang, et al., 2017). Moreover, the 320 ~ 313 Ma granite veins folded with the amphibolite (Wang, Zhang, Chen, et al., 2018; Zhao, Sun, Diwu, et al., 2017), perhaps representing the syn-tectonic magmatism during the formation and deformation of amphibolite. Taking into account of above geochronological data, we suggest the Hongliuxia SAC was developing during Early Silurian to Late Carboniferous at least.

A possible evolutionary model of the Hongliuxia SAC is proposed in Figure 9. (a) Prior to 440 Ma, the oceanic plate subduction was initiated in the southern Dunhuang region; (b) During the subduction (440 ~ 310 Ma), the basalts, carbonates, and sediments, even the potential continental fragments and oceanic plateau on the sea floor were transported to the trench. The different rocks were subducted and metamorphosed in different depths or were docked in the SAC due to high buoyancy (such as the continental fragments). Some metamorphic rocks would be exhumed to the shallow level and juxtaposed with each other; (c) The oceanic basin could be closed after 310 Ma.

Details are in the caption following the image
A possible evolutionary model of the Hongliuxia SAC in the southern Dunhuang Orogen [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

6.3 Tectonic implication

The Beishan Orogen is traditionally considered as the southernmost part of the CAOB, which consists of several ophiolitic mélanges and arcs (Xiao et al., 2010). The southernmost unit of the Beishan Orogen is the Shibanshan terrain. Some researchers regarded the Shibanshan terrain is a continental arc along the northern margin of the Dunhuang Block formed by the southward subduction of the PAO (Xiao et al., 2010; Zuo, Zhang, He, & Zhang, 1991), which developed at least by the beginning of Late Cambrian to Early Ordovician (Tian & Xiao, 2019). And some other people considered it as a Mesoproterozoic microcontinent amalgamated in the Beishan Orogen (He, Klemd, Yan, & Zhang, 2018; He, Sun, Mao, Zong, & Zhang, 2015; He, Zong, Jiang, Xiang, & Zhang, 2014; Jiang, He, Zong, Zhang, & Zhao, 2013; Yuan et al., 2015). In both modes, the Dunhuang Block was viewed as a fragment of Precambrian continent, and the southern extension of the CAOB is terminated at the Shibanshan terrain.

However, in this study, the identification of the Hongliuxia SAC in the southern Dunhuang Block confirms the oceanic plate subduction event occurred in the Dunhuang region during the Palaeozoic. And this subduction event was possibly responsible for the generation of the long-lived (460 ~ 360 Ma) Palaeozoic Sanweishan accretionary arc in the northern Dunhuang Block (Shi et al., 2020). The spatial–temporal configuration of the Sanweishan arc and Hongliuxia SAC pictures an accretionary arc and forearc accretionary complex system in the Dunhuang region, indicating the Dunhuang Block is a Palaeozoic Orogen developed on the north-dipping subduction zone.

Besides, the rock association of granitic gneiss, clastic rocks, schists, marble, and migmatites in the southern part of the Shibanshan terrain (He et al., 2015; He, Zong, et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2010; Zuo et al., 1991) is very similar to the metamorphic complex in the Sanweishan area (northern Dunhuang Block) in terms of compositions and ages (Meng et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2020; Zhao, Sun, Ao, Zhang, & Zhu, 2017). In the Sanweishan area, the metamorphic complex displays the structure-rock association similar to the accretionary complex (Shi et al., 2020), such as the strongly folded arc-derived detritus metasedimentary rocks, turbidites exhibiting incomplete Bouma sequence and the “block-in-matrix” fabric. If so, the metamorphic complex in the southern Shibanshan and Sanweishan areas may constitute a broad accretionary wedge extending from north to south. The Dunhuang Orogen, then, may be the southernmost margin of the broad CAOB.

7 CONCLUSIONS

  1. Field relationships between the meta-mafic rocks and metasedimentary matrix exhibit a similarity with the subduction–accretion complex (SAC).
  2. Geochemistry of the meta-mafic rocks constrains their origination from the components of the oceanic plate.
  3. Identification of the Palaeozoic SAC in the southern Dunhuang Block suggests its nature of orogen. And the Dunhuang Orogen is possible the southward extension of the CAOB.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. This study was supported by the National key research and development plan – Major special project for exploration and mining of deep earth resources (Grant number 2016YFC0600401), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 41730215), and the Doctor foundation of Henan Polytechnic University (760307/018). We thank the Wuhan Sample Solution Analytical Technology Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China for the whole-rock geochemical testing and analyses.

    DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

    The data that support the findings of this study are openly available.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.