Volume 17, Issue 4 pp. 261-266
Review
Free Access

Vascular Neoplasms of the Liver

Jingmei Lin M.D., Ph.D.

Jingmei Lin M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Westerhoff M.D.

Corresponding Author

Maria Westerhoff M.D.

Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

CORRESPONDENCE

Maria Westerhoff, M.D., Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 May 2021
Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

Abstract

Answer questions and earn CME

Abbreviations

  • EHE
  • epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
  • HHV8
  • human herpes virus 8
  • KS
  • Kaposi sarcoma
  • The main vascular tumors of the liver include hemangioma, Kaposi sarcoma (KS), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE), and angiosarcoma. They develop in noncirrhotic livers and are increasingly being detected incidentally by imaging. All of these tumors express markers of vascular lineage, such as ERG, CD31, and CD34. The purpose of this review is to highlight the main pathological aspects of these tumors.

    Hemangioma

    Hemangioma is the most common benign hepatic vascular neoplasm and is usually found incidentally on imaging studies.1, 2 Women are most commonly affected, but the cause is unknown. Although patients may be asymptomatic, clinical manifestations may also include hepatomegaly, right upper quadrant abdominal pain, anemia, and high-output congestive heart failure.3 Hemangiomas often follow a benign course, and a nonoperative approach is recommended unless the patients are symptomatic or have large tumors.1

    Grossly, hemangiomas are well-circumscribed, dark brown, and spongy tumors. They can be focal lesions or affect the liver diffusely with multiple foci; the diffuse pattern is also termed hemangiomatosis and can clinically mimic metastases.4, 5 There are three histological subtypes of hepatic hemangiomas: cavernous, lobular, and anastomosing.

    Cavernous hemangioma, the most common of these subtypes, is composed of variably sized, dilated vascular channels surrounded by interspersed fibrous tissue. The vessels may be thick but do not have muscular layers and are lined by flat endothelial cells without atypia (Fig. 1A). It is speculated that when the vascular spaces of cavernous hemangiomas collapse and regress, they then become sclerosing hemangiomas6 (Fig. 1B). Areas of scarring and occasional calcification may be present adjacent to conventional components of cavernous hemangioma.

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Hepatic hemangioma. (A) Variably sized dilated vascular channels are blood filled. The vessels consist of thin muscular layers and are lined by uniform, bland-looking flat endothelial cells. (B) Sclerosing hemangioma comprises vascular channels in a background of scar-like fibrous tissue. (C) Lobular capillary hemangioma consists of vascular proliferation with no apparent muscular layers. Flat or plump endothelial cells line the capillary-like vessels. (D) Anastomosing hemangioma is characterized by interconnecting sinusoidal-like vessels lined by hobnail-appearing endothelial cells. The lesion is hypercellular and densely packed. However, the lining endothelial tumor cells are relatively uniform with mild cytological atypia. No mitosis is seen. Original magnification, ×100 (A, B); ×200 (D); ×400 (C).

    Lobular capillary hemangioma is the second most common subtype. It consists of numerous capillary-like vessels lined by endothelial cells. No cytological atypia or mitoses are present (Fig. 1C). Infantile hemangioma, which is also known as infantile hemangioendothelioma, is a form of capillary hemangioma that occurs in infancy or early childhood.7

    Anastomosing hemangioma is a rare, recently recognized variant characterized by interconnecting capillary-sized vessels that are lined by scattered hobnail endothelial cells. Although the tumor can simulate angiosarcoma because of its hypercellularity, the cells are relatively uniform, and cytological atypia is absent or mild (Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, the histological similarities between the two entities can pose a diagnostic dilemma in needle core biopsies.8

    Hepatic KS

    Hepatic KSKS is caused by human herpes virus 8 (HHV8) infection. It occurs most often in male patients with a history of immunosuppression, transplant, or human immunodeficiency virus infection. On autopsy or surgically resected liver specimens, KS is characterized by dark reddish areas around the portal tracts, as well as multiple red lesions in the background parenchyma. On microscopy, KS is composed of spindle cells with bland nuclei that interlace with one another (Fig. 2A). The cells are often centered around portal tracts and can dissect between collagen fibers and surround bile ducts. HHV8 positivity is confirmatory (Fig. 2B).9

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Hepatic KS. A spindle cell proliferation infiltrates the connective tissue of the portal tract. (B) Immunohistochemistry for HHV8 infection highlights the KS cells in brown, confirming the diagnosis. Original magnification, ×100 (A); ×200 (B).

    EHE

    EHE is considered a low-grade malignancy that is more common in middle-aged women. Recent molecular characterization has shown defining translocations such as CAMTA1-WWTR1 fusion (most common) and a subset of EHE with YAP1-TFE3 fusion.10 Grossly, livers affected by classic EHE have multifocal, white, firm nodules that affect the periphery and subcapsular aspects. The tumors have ill-defined, blurred borders as they interface with the surrounding parenchyma (Fig. 3A). The EHE variant that has YAP1-TFE3 may have well-defined liver nodules. On microscopy, classic EHE (with CAMTA1-WWTR1 fusion) often is centered around a feeding vessel and has a dense, fibrotic, or myxoid stromal matrix. The tumor cells are epithelioid, have occasional intracytoplasmic lumens containing red blood cells, but do not form actual vessels (Fig. 3C, D). The neoplasm invades sinusoids and larger vessels; they can form papillary tufts that mimic carcinoma. Vascular markers help confirm the lineage of the tumor (Fig. 3B), but CAMTA1 immunohistochemistry can also confirm the diagnosis of EHE.11 The subset of EHE that has YAP1-TFE3 fusion has more mature vessel lumen formation compared with classic EHE; it is unclear whether the tumors harboring the YAP1-TFE3 fusion represent a true subtype of EHE or are merely a distinct tumor type (Fig. 3E, F).

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Hepatic EHE. (A) This is a liver resection specimen of EHE, which demonstrates the blurry borders between the pale, rounded tumor and the surrounding liver parenchyma on low power. (B) Immunohistochemistry for vascular markers such as CD31 and ERG is positive in EHE, as it is in most neoplasms of vascular lineage. Here it highlights clusters of EHE cells on a biopsy specimen of EHE. (C) The most common morphology of EHE is that of epithelioid cells in a myxoid stromal background, as seen in this image. (D) The EHE cells have intracytoplasmic lumens containing red blood cells. (E) The EHE variant harboring YAP1-TFE3 fusions can make better-formed vascular channels, seen here containing aggregates of red blood cells. (F) This type of EHE has large cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. It is shown here insinuating between hepatocyte trabeculae. Original magnification, ×20 (A); ×100 (B, C, E); ×200 (D, F).

    Angiosarcoma

    Hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy that accounts for 0.1% to 2% of all primary liver malignancies.12 Patients present in their 60s and 70s, with a male-to-female ratio of 3-4:1. Risk factors associated with angiosarcoma include radiation/radiotherapy, thorium dioxide, arsenicals, vinyl chloride, androgenic anabolic steroids, hemochromatosis, and von Recklinghausen disease.12 The prognosis is bleak, and patients usually die within 6 to 12 months.13

    Grossly, hepatic angiosarcomas may present variably as a large dominant mass, multiple nodules, a mixture of dominant mass with nodules, and rarely, a diffusely infiltrating micronodular tumor.14 The border of the tumor is ill-defined. The surface of the tumor is often heterogeneous, consisting of solid grayish-white areas and/or cystic changes that intermingle with hemorrhage and/or necrosis.

    Angiosarcoma is notorious for its ability to display a wide morphological spectrum, ranging from well-differentiated vascular channels to a poorly differentiated solid lesion of vaguely slit-formed vessels. Well-differentiated angiosarcoma is characterized by dilated sinusoidal spaces lined by flat, cuboidal, or hobnail endothelial cells with minimal or mild cytological atypia (Fig. 4A). The other end of the spectrum is the poorly differentiated angiosarcoma that is often highly cellular and forms solid nests or sheets. Angiosarcoma cells grow along vascular channels, replace normal endothelial cells, invade into sinusoidal spaces, and displace hepatic plates (Fig. 4B). Formation of complex vascular structure is common and can be striking, which indicates the lineage of the tumor (Fig. 4C). In solid areas, vasoformative structures are sparse and inconspicuous, which leaves a subtle hint for the origin of the tumor (Fig. 4D). The tumor cells are pleomorphic and are epithelioid (Fig. 4D) or spindled (Fig. 4E) with high-grade cytological atypia. Bizarre multinucleated cells are commonly seen. Mitoses, even atypical ones, are brisk.

    Details are in the caption following the image
    Hepatic angiosarcoma. (A) The well-differentiated angiosarcoma is characteristic by dilated sinusoidal spaces lined by hobnail endothelial cells with mild cytological atypia. (B) The tumor grows into sinusoidal space. (C) The tumor cells are enlarged and hyperchromatic that forms complex vascular structures. (D) The angiosarcoma cells are large, rounded, and epithelioid with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, high-grade atypia, and prominent nucleoli. Mitoses are brisk. Vasoformative structures are sparse and inconspicuous (arrows). (E) The angiosarcoma cells are spindled lining the vessels. (F) The angiosarcoma tumor cells are strongly positive for ERG. Original magnification, ×200 (B, C); ×400 (A, D, E, F).

    Conclusion

    We provide an overview of hepatic vascular tumors with a focus on histomorphological features. Complex growth patterns, degrees of cytological atypia, infiltrating border, and lymphovascular invasion are key features that distinguish among benign, intermediate, and malignant hepatic vascular tumors. Table 1 provides a summary of each entity and points of clinical and diagnostic importance.

    TABLE 1. Summary of Histological and Clinical Associations for Hepatic Vascular Tumors
    Entity Clinical Associations Important Histological Findings
    Hemangioma

    • Most common hepatic vascular neoplasm
    • Often incidentally found
    • Benign

    • Well circumscribed
    • Variably sized dilated vascular channels surrounded by fibrous tissue
    • Lesional endothelial cells demonstrate no atypia

    KS

    • Caused by HHV8
    • Mostly male patients with history of immunosuppression
    • Often multifocal
    • Prognosis: 80%-90% 5-year survival rate with combination antiretroviral therapy +/− chemotherapy, depending on stage

    • Spindle cell lesion with bland nuclei
    • + HHV8 immunostain confirmatory

    EHE

    • Often multifocal
    • Can infiltrate large hepatic veins and may cause Budd-Chiari syndrome
    • “Lollipop” appearance on imaging: large vessels occluded by tumor is “stick” and tumor is “head” of lollipop
    • Low-grade malignancy

    • Classic histology: dense fibrotic or myxoid stromal matrix with epithelioid tumor cells containing intracytoplasmic red blood cells, no actual vessels
    • Associated translocations: CAMTA1-WWTR1 fusion (classic)
    • YAP1-TFE3 fusion in subset, may have more mature neoplastic vessels

    Angiosarcoma

    • Rare but most common primary sarcoma of liver
    • Risk factors: radiation, arsenic, vinyl chloride
    • Aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis

    • Wide histological spectrum ranging from well-differentiated vascular channels to poorly differentiated solid growth pattern

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.