Volume 150B, Issue 7 pp. 960-966
Research Article
Full Access

Common and rare variants of DAOA in bipolar disorder

Manjula Maheshwari

Manjula Maheshwari

Human Genome Sequencing Center, Departments of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Jiajun Shi

Jiajun Shi

Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Judith A. Badner

Judith A. Badner

Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Skol

Andrew Skol

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Virginia L. Willour

Virginia L. Willour

Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Donna M. Muzny

Donna M. Muzny

Human Genome Sequencing Center, Departments of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Wheeler

David A. Wheeler

Human Genome Sequencing Center, Departments of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Fowler R. Gerald

Fowler R. Gerald

Human Genome Sequencing Center, Departments of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Sevilla Detera-Wadleigh

Sevilla Detera-Wadleigh

Genetic Basis of Mood and Anxiety Disorders Unit, Mood and Anxiety Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Francis J. McMahon

Francis J. McMahon

Genetic Basis of Mood and Anxiety Disorders Unit, Mood and Anxiety Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
James B. Potash

James B. Potash

Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Elliot S. Gershon

Elliot S. Gershon

Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Chunyu Liu

Corresponding Author

Chunyu Liu

Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, 924 East 57th Street, Knapp Center, R012, Chicago, IL 60637.Search for more papers by this author
Richard A. Gibbs

Richard A. Gibbs

Human Genome Sequencing Center, Departments of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 February 2009
Citations: 8

Manjula Maheshwari and Jiajun Shi are joint first co-authors.

How to Cite this Article: Maheshwari M, Shi J, Badner JA, Skol A, Willour VL, Muzny DM, Wheeler DA, Gerald FR, Detera-Wadleigh S, McMahon FJ, Potash JB, Gershon ES, Liu C, Gibbs RA. 2009. Common and Rare Variants of DAOA in Bipolar Disorder. Am J Med Genet Part B 150B:960–966.

Abstract

The D-amino acid oxidase activator (DAOA, previously known as G72) gene, mapped on 13q33, has been reported to be genetically associated with bipolar disorder (BP) in several populations. The consistency of associated variants is unclear and rare variants in exons of the DAOA gene have not been investigated in psychiatric diseases. We employed a conditional linkage method—STatistical Explanation for Positional Cloning (STEPC) to evaluate whether any associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) account for the evidence of linkage in a pedigree series that previously has been linked to marker D13S779 at 13q33. We also performed an association study in a sample of 376 Caucasian BP parent-proband trios by genotyping 38 common SNPs in the gene region. Besides, we resequenced coding regions and flanking intronic sequences of DAOA in 555 Caucasian unrelated BP patients and 564 mentally healthy controls, to identify putative functional rare variants that may contribute to disease. One SNP rs1935058 could “explain” the linkage signal in the family sample set (P = 0.055) using STEPC analysis. No significant allelic association was detected in an association study by genotyping 38 common SNPs in 376 Caucasian BP trios. Resequencing identified 53 SNPs, of which 46 were novel SNPs. There was no significant excess of rare variants in cases relative to controls. Our results suggest that DAOA does not have a major effect on BP susceptibility. However, DAOA may contribute to bipolar susceptibility in some specific families as evidenced by the STEPC analysis. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

INTRODUCTION

Bipolar disorder (BP) is a common neuropsychiatric disorder affecting about 1% of the adult population [Weissman et al., 1996]. Gene mapping studies using microsatellite markers have identified chromosome 13q32–33 as one of the putative loci for BP [Detera-Wadleigh et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2001; Badner and Gershon, 2002]. The G72/G30 gene complex was identified in a 65 kb region on 13q33, on the overlapping sense and antisense DNA strands, and was reported to be associated with schizophrenia [Chumakov et al., 2002]. G72 was officially named as D-amino acid oxidase activator (DAOA), based on the biological interaction of an artificially expressed G72 protein with D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) and based on its regulation of D-serine, a substrate of DAAO [Chumakov et al., 2002]. Subsequently, Hattori et al. 2003 reported significant association of G72/G30 with BP in a sample of 22 pedigrees from the Clinical Neurogenetics (CNG) sample set [Berrettini et al., 1991], with replication of haplotypic association in a second family sample set from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Genetics Initiative for BP (waves 1–2) [Nurnberger et al., 1997]. Since then, significant or suggestive replication of BP association with G72/G30 has been reported in multiple candidate gene studies [Addington et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2004; Schumacher et al., 2004; Fallin et al., 2005; Williams et al., 2006; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, 2007; Baum et al., 2008; Prata et al., 2008; Sklar et al., 2008]. However, significant association with BP was not found either in our meta-analysis (all P > 0.05 for significance testing of overall odds ratios (ORs)) [Shi et al., 2008], or in recent genome-wide association studies at P > 10−7 [Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, 2007; Baum et al., 2008; Ferreira et al., 2008; Sklar et al., 2008]. To investigate whether variants in the DAOA gene region influences BP susceptibility in European Americans, we performed an association study in a family sample overlapping with previously studied samples.

Before the finding of BP association in two family sample sets [Hattori et al., 2003], we had mapped the BP linkage region to 13q32–q33 in the CNG pedigrees, where DAOA resides [Detera-Wadleigh et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2001]. To evaluate whether any of the associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) accounts for the evidence of linkage at 13q32–33 in CNG pedigrees [Liu et al., 2001], we employed a conditional linkage method introduced by Sun et al. 2002. This method is a re-linkage analysis conditional on genotypes of a SNP in the original linked region. If no evidence of linkage remains (conditional on genotype, the linkage statistic has P > 0.05), that SNP accounts for the linkage (see Materials and Methods Section) [Sun et al., 2002].

An alternative to the common disease-common variant hypothesis [Lander, 1996; Reich and Lander, 2001; Lohmueller et al., 2003] is the common disease-multiple rare variants (CD-MRV) hypothesis, which postulates that disease is caused by many rare genetic variants each with a large effect [Pritchard, 2001; Pritchard and Cox, 2002]. The rare variants are likely to be of recent origin, highly penetrant, and may be specific to a family or individual [Pritchard, 2001; Pritchard and Cox, 2002; Gibbs, 2005]. Current association studies with limited sample size have little power to detect frequency differences between case and control groups for a specific rare variant, but may be able to detect a cumulative frequency difference over a set of rare variants [see summarized supportive evidence in Topol and Frazer, 2007], as well as genomic structure variants (e.g., copy number variations [Sebat et al., 2007; Walsh et al., 2008]). To identify putative functional variants that may contribute to BP, we resequenced known exons, splice sites, and flanking intronic sequences in the DAOA gene region. We did not sequence the G30 gene, as it has much less expression and functional evidence (Cheng L, Liu C, Gershon ES, et al. unpublished data).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Common SNP Association Tests

Three hundred seventy-six parent-offspring trios (parents plus one affected child) were selected from three BP projects: the CNG project, the NIMH Genetics Initiative project, and the University of Chicago-Johns Hopkins-NIMH Intramural Program (CHIP). All participants were of European descent according to self-reported ancestry and further confirmed by a STRUCTURE [Pritchard et al., 2000] analysis using 254 unlinked SNPs (data not shown). Of 376 affected offspring, 335 met DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder type I (BPI) and 41 for schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (SAB); 219 were females and 157 were males. Two hundred seventy-nine samples (24.7%) from 93 trios overlapped with the subjects tested in the original BP association study [Hattori et al., 2003].

Thirty previously tested SNPs in CNG and NIMH waves 1–2 samples ([Hattori et al., 2003] and unpublished data) were selected for the present association study. Two SNPs (rs1935057 and rs1935058, four base pair away from each other) were genotyped by direct sequencing of amplified fragments (primers and condition for polymerase chain reaction are available upon request). The other 28 SNPs were genotyped using Sequenom iPLEX MassArray approach (Sequenom, San Diego, CA). The Assay Design 3.1 software (Sequenom) was used to design multiplex PCR primers and single base extension primers. PCR amplification, dephosphorylation with shrimp alkaline, and single nucleotide extension reaction was carried out in 384-well plates. PedCheck1.1 was used to detect any Mendelian inconsistencies [O'Connell and Weeks, 1998], and Merlin to detect any unlikely recombinants [Abecasis et al., 2002]. All genotype errors were manually resolved by assigning problematic genotypes as missing prior to statistical analysis. The genotype data finally included had an average genotyping success rate of >95.5% for 30 SNPs.

Eight additional SNPs (rs978714, rs2025522, rs3916964, rs9558551, rs7981258, rs9301029, rs1253464, and rs9519671) in the upstream region of DAOA were tested in the same family sample sets, but not necessary the same individuals. These 1,115 individuals included 6 trios and 7 quads (parents plus two affected children) from the CNG collections, 53 trios and 170 quads from the NIMH waves 1–4 collections, and 42 trios and 26 quads from the CHIP collections. All individuals were of European ancestry. Of the 507 affected offspring from the 101 trios and 203 quads, 481 met DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria for BPI and 26 for SAB. Three hundred were females and 207 were males. Three hundred thirty-one samples (28.8%) from 31 trios and 57 quads overlapped with the subjects tested in our previous study [Hattori et al., 2003].

These eight SNPs were genotyped using Illumina Bead Array technology [Oliphant et al., 2002]. After data cleaning using PedCheck1.1 [O'Connell and Weeks, 1998] and Merlin [Abecasis et al., 2002], the genotype data had an average genotyping success rate of >99.8%.

Allelic transmission disequilibrium tests (TDTs) of 38 SNPs were carried out for the disease trait using PLINK [Purcell et al., 2007]. Haploview (version 4.0) [Barrett et al., 2005] was used to test Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) in the parents of affected offspring. With PBAT (www.biostat.harvard.edu/∼clange/default.htm), under a multiplicative inheritance model, and at significance level of P < 0.0013 (for 30 SNPs tested), this sample had 80% power to detect ORs of 1.9 and 1.6 for minor allele frequencies of 0.1 and 0.5, respectively.

STatistical Explanation for Positional Cloning (STEPC) Analysis for SNPs Accounting for Linkage

Eight SNPs in the DAOA gene region have shown evidence for BP association in either CNG pedigrees (rs1935058, rs1815686, rs1341402, rs12862108, rs9301030, rs1935062, and rs778294) [Hattori et al., 2003] or the combined CNG and NIMH waves 1–4 pedigrees (rs778326, unpublished data). To test whether any association underlies the previously observed linkage signals in the CNG sample set [Liu et al., 2001], we genotyped these eight SNPs in a subset of CNG pedigrees. This sample set included 19 families with 146 samples. Fifty-two individuals were diagnosed with BPI (33 females and 19 males), and 20 with BPII (16 females and 4 males). Since the previous linkage signal was for sibships with broad-defined BP including BPII, we included BPII in STEPC analysis.

Genotyping was carried out using Sequenom iPLEX MassArray (Sequenom). One SNP failed in genotyping (rs11815686) and was re-genotyped using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) with enzyme BtsI. PedCheck1.1 [O'Connell and Weeks, 1998] and Merlin [Abecasis et al., 2002] were used to detect genotype errors. All genotype errors were treated as missing data. The average genotyping success rate was >98.2%.

The method of Sun et al. 2002 as implemented in STEPC software (http://hg-wen.uchicago.edu/software.html), identifies SNPs that best explain the observed linkage to a region. The information provided by this analysis is different from that provided by tests of either linkage or association. The evidence for linkage is conditioned on the genotypes for the SNP in question. If there is no residual evidence for linkage, that is, when the P-value for the conditional linkage statistic TG (Test statistic given Genotypes) is >0.05, this implies that the SNP fully explains (accounts for) the evidence for linkage. Since strong linkage evidence for the 13q32–34 region (D13S779) is present in the CNG sample set [Liu et al., 2001], we carried out STEPC analysis on eight SNPs with association evidence (Table I), using the original microsatellite data for linkage information.

Table I. STEPC Results of Eight Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the DAOA Gene Region
Marker Position on 13q Alleles (1/2) Allele 1 frequency sib_tdt P-value Conditional TG TG P-value
rs1935058 104909351 C/T 0.47 0.0009 1.60 0.055
rs1341402 104913510 T/C 0.81 0.0083 1.77 0.038
rs9301030 104924309 G/A 0.71 0.031 1.78 0.038
rs1815686 104907485 C/G 0.55 0.039 1.88 0.030
rs12862108 104924209 G/T 0.80 0.020 1.97 0.024
rs1935062 104926137 A/C 0.61 0.0074 1.98 0.024
rs778294 104940236 A/G 0.21 0.017 1.99 0.023
rs778326 104948042 A/T 0.80 0.026 2.00 0.023
  • TG, test statistic given genotypes.
  • a Based on human genome sequence (NCBI Build 35, May 2004, hg17).
  • b Allele 1 frequencies based on unrelated parents.
  • c Test statistics conditional on genotypes of corresponding single nucleotide polymorphism.

Resequencing of Exons in DAOA and Rare Variant Association Test

A total of 555 unrelated bipolar patients were recruited for this study. Of them, five were from the CNG collections [Berrettini et al., 1991], 478 from the NIMH Genetics Initiative waves 1–4 collections (http://www.nimhgenetics.org/) [Nurnberger et al., 1997; Dick et al., 2003], and 72 from the CHIP collection [Potash et al., 2007]. Ascertainment and diagnostic methods for participants from CNG, the NIMH waves 1–4 and the CHIP collections have been described in detail elsewhere [Berrettini et al., 1991; Nurnberger et al., 1997; Potash et al., 2007]. All individuals were of European ancestry based on self-reported ancestry and further confirmed by a STRUCTURE [Pritchard et al., 2000] analysis using 254 unlinked SNPs (data not shown). Five hundred thirty-one patients were diagnosed as BPI, and 24 as SAB; 327 were females and 228 were males.

Five hundred sixty-four unrelated control subjects were selected from the NIMH Schizophrenia Genetics Initiative controls collection (http://www.nimhgenetics.org/, a list of the contributors to sample collection is shown in Acknowledgments Section). These control samples were all of European ancestry and free of major psychiatric disorders. Of these 564 subjects, 282 were females and 282 were males.

Exons of all 14 splicing forms of DAOA reported and/or identified so far [Chumakov et al., 2002; Hattori et al., 2003; Cheng et al., 2007], splice sites, and flanking intronic sequences (with reference to NM_172370), were sequenced in all the selected subjects. The target sequences were amplified in 10 fragments. Exon specific primer pairs (Supplementary Table I) were designed using the program Primer 3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/). Universal M13 forward or reverse primer tails were attached to each amplicon-specific primer except for exon 2. For exon 2, internal forward and reverse sequencing primers were designed separately. PCR reactions were established using the Qiagen PCR kit, with an individual amplicon size of 270–550 base pairs. PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels and purified using ExoSap (USB Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio). Bidirectional sequencing of each fragment was performed separately using big dye terminator sequencing chemistry on 3730XL DNA Sequencers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The resulting sequences were analyzed using the program SNPdetector [Zhang et al., 2005], and SNPs were confirmed manually with assistance from the program Sequencher (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI).

All sequencing-derived variants were tested for departures from HWE. The genotype data, excluding 27 samples with more than five missing genotypes, had an average genotyping success rate of >99%. A total of 543 cases and 549 controls were used for further analysis. Allele frequency in cases and controls were calculated using Helix Tree version 6.1 (Golden Helix, Inc., Bozeman, MT).

We tested for an excess of rare variants using two ad hoc methods. First, we restricted the analysis to those variants that were observed either only in patients or only in controls, and then conditional on the number of alleles observed at each SNP, determined if significantly more alleles were observed in cases than in controls. The second method is identical to the first but the analysis is restricted to only SNPs with MAF ≤0.01 in the combined sample of cases and controls. Significance was determined in two ways: by permuting case and control status, which preserves the correlation between variants due to linkage disequilibrium, and by permuting alleles between cases and controls one SNP at a time, which ignores linkage disequilibrium between variants.

RESULTS

No significant allelic association with disease was found for 38 common SNPs tested in the family samples (Supplementary Table II). The genotype distribution of ss107796323 in parents was not in HWE (P = 0.0001).

For the CNG dataset, which is a subset of the originally reported linkage data [Detera-Wadleigh et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2001], we had an unconditional linkage statistic (TG) of 2.72 (LOD score of 1.61, P < 0.003). Results for eight SNPs are displayed in Table I. The results showed that the best-weighted linkage statistic is T_w3 with P = 0.0032. Using this statistic, the significant SNP that best explains the linkage result is rs1935058 with P = 0.055 (Table I).

A total of 53 SNPs were detected in our resequencing effort of exons of the DAOA gene in 543 cases and 549 controls (Supplementary Table III, new SNP with ss IDs assigned by NCBI). Of them, 46 were novel and seven had been previously reported in NCBI dbSNP. Thirteen SNPs were unique to cases, 17 unique to controls, 11 common to both with MAF ≤0.01 and 12 common to both with MAF > 0.01. Supplementary Table III summarizes the allele frequencies of major and minor alleles of all the SNPs detected in cases and controls.

Six samples were heterozygous for two SNPs (ss104807118 and ss104807122) and three of these six samples were also heterozygous for the SNP ss104807105 (Supplementary Table IV). Interestingly, all three SNPs were present in cases only. However, we did not detect a significant excess of rare variants in cases relative to controls (case only/control only: P = 0.088; all variants considered: P = 0.131).

DISCUSSION

DAOA has been reviewed as one of the best-supported BP candidate genes [Maier et al., 2005; Craddock and Forty, 2006; Farmer et al., 2007]. However, the associated SNPs or haplotypes have not been consistent across studies [Detera-Wadleigh and McMahon, 2006; Shi et al., 2008]. Recent genome-wide association studies [Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, 2007; Baum et al., 2008; Ferreira et al., 2008; Sklar et al., 2008] have not identified any single SNP association with BP across any ethnic group studied. These results, together with results of this study, suggest that DAOA does not have a major effect on BP susceptibility. However, it is possible that DAOA may contribute to disease risk in a specific population or in specific families, as shown in our STEPC analysis in the CNG families (Table I) as well as in previous association analyses [Hattori et al., 2003; Addington et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2004; Schumacher et al., 2004; Fallin et al., 2005; Williams et al., 2006; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, 2007; Baum et al., 2008; Prata et al., 2008; Sklar et al., 2008]. Moreover, the DAOA gene has shown to link to BP with persecutory delusions [Schulze et al., 2005] and major depression with trait anxiety [Rietschel et al., 2008]. Therefore DAOA may be genetically linked to subgroup of BP (i.e., endophenotype or subtype) [Gottesman and Gould, 2003; Bearden and Freimer, 2006; Cannon and Keller, 2006]. With limited sample size, we did not perform further subtype analysis, leaving that to several better powered ongoing large case–control BP studies, including the Genetic Association Information Network (GAIN) BP project, which has significant overlap of samples with this study.

In this study, rs1935058, accounting for the linkage signal on 13q32–34 in a small-size family sample, is 7.2 kb upstream of the transcript start site of DAOA, and possibly affects gene expression and function. Further functional annotation of this SNP or proxy SNP(s) in LD with it is needed. It also cannot be excluded that other variants on this chromosome region (harboring at least 59 known genes according to data in the UCSC Genome Browser and NCBI Mapview) contribute to the linkage signals and/or increase risk of BP [Detera-Wadleigh et al., 2007].

Although the CD-MRV hypothesis has received some experimental support [Sebat et al., 2007; Topol and Frazer, 2007; Walsh et al., 2008], our analysis of rare variants in DAOA suggests that it is unlikely that multiple rare variants from this gene contribute significantly to a polygenic phenotype. On the other hand, if this gene with multiple rare variants is associated with disease, a large sample may be needed to reach statistical significance and statistical power. Moreover, it is possible that G72 may underlie disease risk through interactions with other genes in the same neurobiological pathway (i.e., N-methyl D-aspartate receptor-mediated glutamatergic signaling) or related neuronal systems. Identifying rare functional variants in such genes from pathway(s) or the whole genome requires high-throughput resequencing technologies as well as complex approaches to functional validation.

To summarize, we failed to detect significant disease association of common or rare variants in the DAOA gene region in relatively large sample sets, but found that rs1935058 best explained previously identified linkage signal in a specific family sample set. It remains possible that DAOA may contribute to bipolar susceptibility in some specific families.

Acknowledgements

Control subjects from the National Institute of Mental Health Schizophrenia Genetics Initiative (NIMH-GI), data and biomaterials are being collected by the “Molecular Genetics of Schizophrenia II” (MGS-2) collaboration. The investigators and co-investigators are: ENH/Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, MH059571, Pablo V. Gejman, M.D. (Collaboration Coordinator; PI), Alan R. Sanders, M.D.; Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, MH59587, Farooq Amin, M.D. (PI); Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center; New Orleans, Louisiana, MH067257, Nancy Buccola APRN, BC, MSN (PI); University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA,MH60870, William Byerley, M.D. (PI); Washington University, St. Louis, MO, U01, MH060879, C. Robert Cloninger, M.D. (PI); University of Iowa, Iowa, IA,MH59566, Raymond Crowe, M.D. (PI), Donald Black, M.D.; University of Colorado, Denver, CO, MH059565, Robert Freedman, M.D. (PI); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, MH061675, Douglas Levinson M.D. (PI); University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia, MH059588, Bryan Mowry, M.D. (PI); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY,MH59586, Jeremy Silverman, Ph.D. (PI). The samples were collected by V L Nimgaonkar's group at the University of Pittsburgh, as part of a multi-institutional collaborative research project with J. Smoller, M.D. D.Sc. and P. Sklar, M.D. Ph.D. (Massachusetts General Hospital) (grant MH 63420). This study was also supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) awards R01MH061613 (to E.S. Gershon) and R01 MH042243 (to J.B. Potash), National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Young Investigator Awards (to J. Shi), NIMH award 1R21MH083521 and Brain Research Foundation at the University of Chicago (to C. Liu), the Geraldi Norton Foundation and the Eklund Family.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.