Contrast Echocardiography for Assessment of Left Ventricular Thrombi
Sahar S. Abdelmoneim MBBCH, MS, MSc
Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
Search for more papers by this authorPatricia A. Pellikka MD
Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sharon L. Mulvagh MD
Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Address correspondence to Sharon L. Mulvagh, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.Search for more papers by this authorSahar S. Abdelmoneim MBBCH, MS, MSc
Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
Search for more papers by this authorPatricia A. Pellikka MD
Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sharon L. Mulvagh MD
Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Address correspondence to Sharon L. Mulvagh, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The diagnosis of intracardiac thrombi remains clinically relevant, with associated risks of systemic embolization and implications for antithrombotic management. Intravenously injected ultrasound contrast agents, composed of microbubbles smaller than red blood cells, have become established essential adjunctive tools for performance of state-of-the-art echocardiography, providing important information on cardiac structure and function. Despite advances in other imaging modalities, echocardiography remains the initial tool for diagnosis and risk stratification in patients predisposed to developing cardiac thrombi. Ultrasound contrast agents are approved for left ventricular (LV) opacification and endocardial border definition. Additionally, the use of contrast echocardiography facilitates LV thrombus detection by providing contrast opacification within the cardiac chambers to clearly show the “filling defect” of an intracardiac thrombus. Furthermore, contrast perfusion echocardiography can provide an assessment of the tissue characteristics of LV masses suspicious for intracardiac thrombi and, by differentiating an avascular thrombus from a tumor, results in improved diagnostic performance of echocardiography. This article presents a clinical vignette highlighting the sound judgment of using contrast echocardiography to aid in the diagnosis of LV thrombi and will review recent advances in imaging modalities for intracardiac thrombus detection.
Supporting Information
Earn FREE CME credit
Visit www.aium.org to earn CME credit for this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
Movie_File_1.movQuickTime video, 1.1 MB | Video 1 — Two-dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement (Videos 1–4). Apical 4-chamber (Video 1), apical 2-chamber (Video 2), apical long-axis (Video 3), and apical short-axis (Video 4) views show a normal LV size and a low-normal LV ejection fraction (50%). Left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities were noted with apical akinesis and hypokinesis of the mid anterior and septal walls. No LV apical thrombus seen. |
Movie_file_2.movQuickTime video, 1.1 MB | Video 2 — Two-dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement (Videos 1–4). Apical 4-chamber (Video 1), apical 2-chamber (Video 2), apical long-axis (Video 3), and apical short-axis (Video 4) views show a normal LV size and a low-normal LV ejection fraction (50%). Left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities were noted with apical akinesis and hypokinesis of the mid anterior and septal walls. No LV apical thrombus seen. |
Movie_file_3.movQuickTime video, 874.2 KB | Video 3 — Two-dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement (Videos 1–4). Apical 4-chamber (Video 1), apical 2-chamber (Video 2), apical long-axis (Video 3), and apical short-axis (Video 4) views show a normal LV size and a low-normal LV ejection fraction (50%). Left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities were noted with apical akinesis and hypokinesis of the mid anterior and septal walls. No LV apical thrombus seen. |
Movie_file_4.movQuickTime video, 1.2 MB | Video 4 — Two-dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement (Videos 1–4). Apical 4-chamber (Video 1), apical 2-chamber (Video 2), apical long-axis (Video 3), and apical short-axis (Video 4) views show a normal LV size and a low-normal LV ejection fraction (50%). Left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities were noted with apical akinesis and hypokinesis of the mid anterior and septal walls. No LV apical thrombus seen. |
Movie_file_5.movQuickTime video, 975.6 KB | Video 5 — Repeated 2-dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement (Videos 5 and 6). Apical 4-chamber (Video 5) and apical long-axis (Video 6) views show similar findings as in Videos 1–4, except for some haziness in the LV apical region. |
Movie_file_6.movQuickTime video, 937.3 KB | Video 6 — Repeated 2-dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement (Videos 5 and 6). Apical 4-chamber (Video 5) and apical long-axis (Video 6) views show similar findings as in Videos 1–4, except for some haziness in the LV apical region. |
Movie_file_7.movQuickTime video, 2.1 MB | Video 7 — Two-dimensional TTE with contrast enhancement (Definity) (Videos 7 and 8). Images were acquired with a broadband transducer using power modulation-contrast-specific settings at a low mechanical index (=0.2; Philips Sonos 7500). Apical short-axis (Video 7) and apical 2-chamber (Video 8) view show a complete LV opacification effect, with the exception of a discrete filling defect in the LV apex, devoid of contrast microbubbles, consistent with an LV apical thrombus (1.4 × 1.6 cm). |
Movie_file_8.movQuickTime video, 2.3 MB | Video 8 — Two-dimensional TTE with contrast enhancement (Definity) (Videos 7 and 8). Images were acquired with a broadband transducer using power modulation-contrast-specific settings at a low mechanical index (=0.2; Philips Sonos 7500). Apical short-axis (Video 7) and apical 2-chamber (Video 8) view show a complete LV opacification effect, with the exception of a discrete filling defect in the LV apex, devoid of contrast microbubbles, consistent with an LV apical thrombus (1.4 × 1.6 cm). |
Movie_file_9.movQuickTime video, 1.8 MB | Video 9 — Two-dimensional TTE with contrast enhancement (Definity). Apical 4-chamber views were acquired with a slight angulation of the transducer posteriorly to fully display the apex and the filling defect, consistent with a thrombus. |
Movie_file_10.movQuickTime video, 4.5 MB | Video 10 — Repeated 2-dimensional TTE with contrast enhancement (Optison) on a follow-up visit 8 weeks later (Videos 10 and 11). Apical long-axis (Video 10) and apical short-axis (Video 11) views show absence of an apical filling defect, consistent with complete resolution of the large apical thrombus, improvement in the severity of regional wall motion abnormalities with only residual apical anteroseptal hypokinesis, and a normal LV ejection fraction (66%). |
Movie_file_11.movQuickTime video, 4.2 MB | Video 11 — Repeated 2-dimensional TTE with contrast enhancement (Optison) on a follow-up visit 8 weeks later (Videos 10 and 11). Apical long-axis (Video 10) and apical short-axis (Video 11) views show absence of an apical filling defect, consistent with complete resolution of the large apical thrombus, improvement in the severity of regional wall motion abnormalities with only residual apical anteroseptal hypokinesis, and a normal LV ejection fraction (66%). |
Movie_file_12_.movQuickTime video, 3 MB | Video 12 — Two dimensional TTE with contrast enhancement. Apical long-axis view shows contrast swirling apically (due to a higher mechanical index of 0.5), masking the recognition of apical thrombi. |
Movie_FILE_13.movQuickTime video, 310.5 KB | Video 13 — Two-dimensional TTE (Videos 13 and 14). Apical 4-chamber views without contrast enhancement (Video 13) and with contrast enhancement (Video 14) show another example of using a low mechanical index in salvaging the diagnosis of an “LV thrombus in formation,” as shown in Video 14, which was not visualized on the noncontrast study (Video 13). |
Movie_FILE_14__2_.movQuickTime video, 394.1 KB | Video 14 — Two-dimensional TTE (Videos 13 and 14). Apical 4-chamber views without contrast enhancement (Video 13) and with contrast enhancement (Video 14) show another example of using a low mechanical index in salvaging the diagnosis of an “LV thrombus in formation,” as shown in Video 14, which was not visualized on the noncontrast study (Video 13). |
Movie_file_15.movQuickTime video, 984.3 KB | Video 15 — Series of TTE views: inconclusive study for a small mural LV apical thrombus (which was shown by cardiac MRI) (Videos 15–17). Two-dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement: apical 4-chamber (Video 15) and apical 2-chamber (Video 16) views and apical 2-chamber view with color Doppler flow imaging (Video 17). Left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities were noted, with apical akinesis and hypokinesis of the mid anterior and septal walls, as shown in the apical images. The study was, inconclusive regarding detection of small mural LV apical thrombus. |
Movie_file_16.movQuickTime video, 1.5 MB | Video 16 — Series of TTE views: inconclusive study for a small mural LV apical thrombus (which was shown by cardiac MRI) (Videos 15–17). Two-dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement: apical 4-chamber (Video 15) and apical 2-chamber (Video 16) views and apical 2-chamber view with color Doppler flow imaging (Video 17). Left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities were noted, with apical akinesis and hypokinesis of the mid anterior and septal walls, as shown in the apical images. The study was, inconclusive regarding detection of small mural LV apical thrombus. |
Movie_file_17.movQuickTime video, 423.2 KB | Video 17 — Series of TTE views: inconclusive study for a small mural LV apical thrombus (which was shown by cardiac MRI) (Videos 15–17). Two–dimensional TTE without contrast enhancement: apical 4-chamber (Video 15) and apical 2-chamber (Video 16) views and apical 2-chamber view with color Doppler flow imaging (Video 17). Left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities were noted, with apical akinesis and hypokinesis of the mid anterior and septal walls, as shown in the apical images. The study was, inconclusive regarding detection of small mural LV apical thrombus. |
Movie_file_18.movQuickTime video, 2.6 MB | Video 18 — Series of TTE views: inconclusive study for a small mural LV apical thrombus (which was shown by cardiac MRI) (Videos 18 and 19). Two-dimensional TTE with contrast enhancement from the same patient as in Videos 15–17. Images were acquired with a broadband transducer using power modulation-contrast-specific settings at a low mechanical index (=0.2; Philips iE33). Apical 4-chamber (Video 18) and apical short-axis (Video 19) views show an inconclusive study regarding detection of a small mural LV apical thrombus despite optimization of contrast settings. |
Movie_file_19_.movQuickTime video, 1.8 MB | Video 19 — Series of TTE views: inconclusive study for a small mural LV apical thrombus (which was shown by cardiac MRI) (Videos 18 and 19). Two-dimensional TTE with contrast enhancement from the same patient as in Videos 15–17. Images were acquired with a broadband transducer using power modulation-contrast-specific settings at a low mechanical index (=0.2; Philips iE33). Apical 4-chamber (Video 18) and apical short-axis (Video 19) views show an inconclusive study regarding detection of a small mural LV apical thrombus despite optimization of contrast settings. |
Movie_file_20.movQuickTime video, 452.8 KB | Video 20 — Series of TTE views: inconclusive study for a small mural LV apical thrombus (which was shown by cardiac MRI) (Videos 20 and 21). Three-dimensional TTE echocardiography (live 3-dimensional acquisition mode) without contrast enhancement from the same patient as in Videos 15–19. Apical 4-chamber view (Video 20) shows haziness in the apical region, as seen closely in a zoomed mode (Video 21), but still an inconclusive study regarding detection of a small mural LV apical thrombus. |
Movie_file_21.movQuickTime video, 120.3 KB | Video 21 — Series of TTE views: inconclusive study for a small mural LV apical thrombus (which was shown by cardiac MRI) (Videos 20 and 21). Three-dimensional TTE echocardiography (live 3-dimensional acquisition mode) without contrast enhancement from the same patient as in Videos 15–19. Apical 4-chamber view (Video 20) shows haziness in the apical region, as seen closely in a zoomed mode (Video 21), but still an inconclusive study regarding detection of a small mural LV apical thrombus. |
Movie_file_22.movQuickTime video, 139.5 KB | Video 22 — Transthoracic echocardiographic view: inconclusive study for a small mural LV apical thrombus (which was shown by cardiac MRI). Three-dimensional TTE (live 3-dimensional acquisition mode) with contrast enhancement from the same patient as in Videos 15–21. Images were acquired with a broadband transducer using power modulation-contrast LV opacification-specific settings at a low mechanical index of 0.24 (Philips iE33). Apical 4-chamber view shows contrast filling in the apical region with no detection of a small mural LV apical thrombus. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 229–267.
- 2Stratton JR, Lighty GWJr, Pearlman AS, Ritchie JL. Detection of left ventricular thrombus by two-dimensional echocardiography: sensitivity, specificity, and causes of uncertainty. Circulation 1982; 66: 156–166.
- 3Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA. American Society of Echocardiography consensus statement on the clinical applications of ultrasonic contrast agents in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 1179–1201.
- 4Bruder O, Waltering KU, Hunold P. Detection and characterization of left ventricular thrombi by MRI compared to transthoracic echocardiography [in German]. Rofo 2005; 177: 344–349.
- 5Weinsaft JW, Kim RJ, Ross M. Contrast-enhanced anatomic imaging as compared to contrast-enhanced tissue characterization for detection of left ventricular thrombus. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 969–979.
- 6Visser CA, Kan G, Meltzer RS, Dunning AJ, Roelandt J. Embolic potential of left ventricular thrombus after myocardial infarction: a two-dimensional echocardiographic study of 119 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 1276–1280.
- 7Kitzman DW, Goldman ME, Gillam LD, Cohen JL, Aurigemma GP, Gottdiener JS. Efficacy and safety of the novel ultrasound contrast agent perflutren (Definity) in patients with suboptimal baseline left ventricular echocardiographic images. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 669–674.
- 8Asinger RW, Mikell FL, Elsperger J, Hodges M. Incidence of left-ventricular thrombosis after acute transmural myocardial infarction: serial evaluation by two-dimensional echocardiography. N Engl J Med 1981; 305: 297–302.
- 9Basoglu A, De Wolf A, Dendale P, Vanbockrijck M, Hendrikx M, Vranckx P. Echocardiography remains the standard for the diagnostic evaluation of left ventricular tumors: a case report with anatomical correlation. Eur J Echocardiogr 2007; 8: 401–403.
- 10Chamoun AJ, McCulloch M, Xie T, Shah S, Ahmad M. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus two-dimensional echocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular apical thrombi: preliminary findings. J Clin Ultrasound 2003; 31: 412–418.
- 11Kirkpatrick JN, Wong T, Bednarz JE. Differential diagnosis of cardiac masses using contrast echocardiographic perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1412–1419.
- 12Mansencal N, Nasr IA, Pillière R. Usefulness of contrast echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 1667–1670.
- 13Thanigaraj S, Schechtman KB, Pérez JE. Improved echocardiographic delineation of left ventricular thrombus with the use of intravenous second-generation contrast image enhancement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 1022–1026.
- 14Kurt M, Shaikh KA, Peterson L. Impact of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of ventricular function and clinical management in a large prospective cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 802–810.
- 15Son JW, Park WJ, Choi JH. Abnormal left ventricular vortex flow patterns in association with left ventricular apical thrombus formation in patients with anterior myocardial infarction: a quantitative analysis by contrast echocardiography. Circ J 2012; 76: 2640–2646.
- 16 Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Echocardiography Laboratories. ICAEL standards for accreditation in adult echocardiography 2010: parts I–IV. Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Echocardiography Laboratories website. http://www.icael.org/icael/main/icael_standards.htm. Accessed September 2013.
- 17 International Contrast Ultrasound Society website. http://www.icus-society.org/. Accessed September 2013.
- 18Khawaja OA, Shaikh KA, Al-Mallah MH. Meta-analysis of adverse cardiovascular events associated with echocardiographic contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 742–747.
- 19Abdelmoneim SS, Bernier M, Scott CG. Safety of contrast agent use during stress echocardiography in patients with elevated right ventricular systolic pressure: a cohort study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 240–248.
- 20Gabriel RS, Smyth YM, Menon V. Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 1269–1272.
- 21Parker JM, Weller MW, Feinstein LM. Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112: 1039–1045.
- 22Goldstein JA, Schiller NB, Lipton MJ, Ports TA, Brundage BH. Evaluation of left ventricular thrombi by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 757–760.
- 23Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Eggebrecht H. Detection and characterization of intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1539–1544.
- 24Mollet NR, Dymarkowski S, Volders W. Visualization of ventricular thrombi with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ischemic heart disease. Circulation 2002; 106: 2873–2876.
- 25Srichai MB, Junor C, Rodriguez LL. Clinical, imaging, and pathological characteristics of left ventricular thrombus: a comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography with surgical or pathological validation. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 75–84.