Volume 185, Issue 11-12 p. 687
Christmas Offering

XmasTM (brand substitution not permitted)

Jonathan Bromley MB ChB

Corresponding Author

Jonathan Bromley MB ChB

Registrar

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT.

Correspondence: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas A Buckley MD, FRACP

Nicholas A Buckley MD, FRACP

Consultant Toxicologist and Clinical Pharmacologist

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 December 2006
Citations: 2

Abstract

Objective: To study drug prescribing by brand name versus generic name in an Australian teaching hospital.

Results: Overall, 53% of drugs were prescribed by brand name. Brand names were preferred when they were shorter and easier to remember and spell, when there was only one brand on the market, and when the brand name ended in an x.

Conclusion: Doctors might be encouraged to prescribe generically if generic names were devised using the same principles marketers use for devising brand names.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.