Volume 185, Issue 11-12 pp. 637-641
Modern Lifestyle

Estimating the cost of alcohol-related absenteeism in the Australian workforce: the importance of consumption patterns

Kenneth J Pidd PhD

Corresponding Author

Kenneth J Pidd PhD

Senior Research Officer

National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.

Correspondence: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jesia G Berry BHSc(Hons), GDPH

Jesia G Berry BHSc(Hons), GDPH

Research Officer

Research Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.

Search for more papers by this author
Ann M Roche PhD

Ann M Roche PhD

Director

National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.

Search for more papers by this author
James E Harrison MB BS, MPH

James E Harrison MB BS, MPH

Director

Research Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 December 2006
Citations: 35

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the extent and cost of alcohol-related absenteeism in the Australian workforce.

Design: A secondary analysis of select data obtained from 13 582 Australian workers (aged ≥ 14 years) collected as part of the 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey.

Main outcome measures: Self-reported measures of alcohol-related absenteeism, illness or injury absenteeism and alcohol consumption categorised according to National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines for short- and long-term risk.

Results: The use of self-reported measures of alcohol-related absenteeism resulted in an estimate of 2 682 865 work days lost due to alcohol use in 2001, at a cost of $437 million. The use of self-reported measures of illness or injury absenteeism to determine the extent of absenteeism attributable to alcohol use resulted in an estimate of 7 402 341 work days lost, at a cost of $1.2 billion. These estimates are about 12 to 34 times greater than previous estimates based on national data. Low-risk drinkers and infrequent or occasional risky and high-risk drinkers accounted for 49%–66% of alcohol-related absenteeism.

Conclusions: The extent and cost of alcohol-related absenteeism is far greater than previously reported, and more than half the burden of alcohol-related absenteeism is incurred by low-risk drinkers and those who infrequently drink heavily.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.