Volume 73, Issue 4 pp. 1224-1232
Article
Full Access

Producer Welfare Consequences of Regulating Chemical Residues on Agricultural Crops: Maleic Hydrazide and Tobacco

William E. Foster

William E. Foster

assistant professor

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University

Senior authorship is not assigned.

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce A. Babcock

Bruce A. Babcock

assistant professor

Department of Economics, Iowa State University

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 November 1991
Citations: 4

Abstract

A procedure is presented to calculate welfare consequences of chemical regulation from demand curves when input applications are unobserved, and is applied to maleic hydrazide and tobacco. The relationship between chemical residues and weather variables and prices is estimated, and from this we derive demand curves using an application-residue relationship estimated using research station data. Chemical price levels required to attain given regulatory goals are estimated. Yearly producer losses from a chemical ban range from $@@-@@6 million to $@@-@@14 million, two to five times greater than from a tax achieving a 95% assurance rate of residues falling below a proposed standard.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.