Pigeons were trained to peck one key when presented with white noise at any of five intensities lower than a reference intensity, and to peck another key when presented with white noise at any of five intensities greater than the reference intensity. The shape of the stimulus control curves (proportion of responses to one key versus stimulus intensity) changed from a horizontal line at the beginning of training to the sigmoid form of typical psychometric functions at the end of training. The development of stimulus control is described in terms of a model based on the theory of signal recognition and a concept of attention.

REFERENCES

Blough, D. S. Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969, 12, 91–103.
10.1901/jeab.1969.12-91
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Boneau, C. A. and Cole, J. L. Decision theory, the pigeon and the psychophysical function. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 123–135.
10.1037/h0024287
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Chase, S. and Heinemann, E. G. Choices based on redundant information: an analysis of two-dimensional stimulus control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 92, 161–175.
10.1037/h0032083
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Eijkman, E. and Vendrik, A.: Detection theory applied to absolute sensitivity of sensory systems. In J. A. Swets, ed.: Signal detection and recognition by human observers., New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964. Pp. 392–409.
Google Scholar
Ernst, J., Engberg, L., and Thomas, D. R. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971, 16, 177–180.
10.1901/jeab.1971.16-177
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A.: Signal detection theory and psychophysics., New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966.
Google Scholar
Heinemann, E. G., Avin, E., Sullivan, M. A., and Chase, S. Analysis of stimulus generalization with a psychophysical method. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 80, 215–224.
10.1037/h0027309
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Heinemann, E. G. and Chase, S. Conditional stimulus control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 84, 187–197. (a).
10.1037/h0029152
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Heinemann, E. G. and Chase, S. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for auditory intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 84, 483–486. (b).
10.1037/h0029327
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Lovejoy, E. P. An attention theory of discrimination learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1965, 2, 342–362.
10.1016/0022-2496(65)90009-X
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F.: Science and human behavior., New York: MacMillan, 1953.
Google Scholar
Wickelgren, W. A. Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1968, 5, 102–122.
10.1016/0022-2496(68)90059-X
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Zeaman, D. and House, B.: The role of attention in retardates discrimination learning. In N. P. Ellis, ed.: Handbook of mental deficiency., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 159–223.
Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume20, Issue2

September 1973

Pages 183-195

ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF STIMULUS CONTROL¹

Abstract

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF STIMULUS CONTROL1

Abstract

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information

ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF STIMULUS CONTROL¹