Volume 19, Issue 2 pp. 199-209
Full Access

MAINTAINING RESPONDING DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION TESTING IN EXTINCTION1

Kay Malott

Corresponding Author

Kay Malott

WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY

Department of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001.Search for more papers by this author
Richard W. Malott

Richard W. Malott

WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY

Search for more papers by this author
Michael F. Glenn

Michael F. Glenn

WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY

Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1973
Citations: 1

This research was supported by PHS research grant MH 13178 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Public Health Service.

Abstract

Resistance to extinction and generalization gradients were studied following training with a long-adjusting-interval schedule. One large reinforcer occurred at the end of each daily training session. Sessions varied in length from 20 sec to 42.66 min, but were usually the latter. Repeated generalization tests were subsequently conducted for these subjects and subjects trained with a more conventional short-random-interval schedule. The long-adjusting-interval schedule produced generalization gradients that were not qualitatively different from those produced by the conventional procedure. However, the advantages of the long-adjusting-interval schedule are: (1) greater resistance to extinction both within and across generalization tests and (2) more stable gradient slopes within and across tests.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.