Volume 11, Issue 2 pp. 89-98
Full Access

OPERANT CONTROL OF RESPONSE LATENCY IN MONKEYS: EVIDENCE FOR A CENTRAL EXPLANATION1

Carol A. Saslow

Corresponding Author

Carol A. Saslow

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

Predoctoral trainee under Public Health Service grant GM 666-06, administered jointly by the Departments of Physiology and Biophysics and of Psychology, University of Washington.

Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington 98105.Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1968
Citations: 16

This research was supported in part by grants FR 00166 and MH 06722 from the National Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service, and by contract NONR 477(34) between the Office of Naval Research and the University of Washington. Monkeys (M. mulatto) were supplied by the Regional Primate Research Center at the University of Washington.

Abstract

Two monkeys (M. mulatto) were trained to press a telegraph key after onset of a tone and release it quickly in response to a subsequent light or click stimulus occurring after a variable interval. After training first with a fixed time limit on response latency for key release and then with a continuously adjusting limit, reaction time to click was 160 msec and to light, about 200 msec. Temporal contingencies or “payoff bands” were then introduced which reinforced only responses with latencies which fell between two limits 50 msec apart. Feedback was given as to whether each latency was too slow, within the band, or too fast. A trained monkey could precisely center its latency distribution on any 50 msec-wide payoff band located from 200 to 600 msec after the stimulus, with from 60 to 80% of its responses achieving reinforcement. Distribution statistics were comparable to those of trained human subjects. Because such precise timing might be accomplished by a peripheral adjustment, such as changing the manner of holding the key, latency of electromyographic activation was measured in participating arm muscles in one monkey. Electromyographic activation preceded key release by a constant interval, regardless of response latency, indicating a more central mechanism for timing of brief intervals.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.