Volume 19, Issue 2 pp. 166-177
Original article

ILAE survey of neuropsychology practice in pediatric epilepsy surgery evaluation

Madison M. Berl

Corresponding Author

Madison M. Berl

Children's National Health System, Division of Pediatric Neuropsychology, Washington, DC

George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

Correspondence: Madison M. Berl Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington DC, 20010, USA <[email protected]>Search for more papers by this author
Mary Lou Smith

Mary Lou Smith

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga

Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Christine Bulteau

Christine Bulteau

INSERM U1129 “Infantile Epilepsies and Brain Plasticity”, Paris; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité; CEA, Gif sur Yvette

Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Pediatric Neurosurgery Department, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
and the Task Force for Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery for the ILAE Commissions of Pediatrics, Surgical Therapies

and the Task Force for Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery for the ILAE Commissions of Pediatrics, Surgical Therapies

Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 July 2017
Citations: 17

Abstract

Aims. To determine the extent to which specific neuropsychological measures are in common use around the world for the assessment of children who are candidates for epilepsy surgery.

Materials and methods. As part of the work of the International League Against Epilepsy Pediatric Surgical Task Force, a survey was developed and distributed online. The survey consisted of questions related to demographics, training experience, general practice, and specific measures used and at what frequency.

Results. Seventy-eight clinicians with an average of 13.5 years of experience from 19 countries responded to the survey; 69% were English-speaking. Pre- and post-neuropsychological evaluations were conducted with a majority of children undergoing surgical resection for epilepsy. There was high consistency (>90%) among the domains evaluated, while consistency rate among specific measures was more variable (range: 0–100%). Consistency rates were also lower among respondents in non-English-speaking countries. For English-speaking respondents, at least one measure within each domain was used by a majority (>75%) of clinicians; 19 specific measures met this criterion.

Conclusion. There is consensus of measures used in neuropsychological studies of pediatric epilepsy patients which provides a basis for determining which measures to include in establishing a collaborative data repository to study surgical outcomes of pediatric epilepsy. Challenges include selecting measures that promote collaboration with centers in non-English-speaking countries and providing data from children under age 5.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.