Volume 2025, Issue 1 2635735
Research Article
Open Access

Ethnomedical Knowledge of Plants Used in Traditional Medicine in Mampa Village, Haut-Katanga Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Bashige Chiribagula Valentin

Corresponding Author

Bashige Chiribagula Valentin

Department of Pharmacology , Laboratory of Therapeutic Chemistry and Analysis of Natural Substances , Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UNILU) , Lubumbashi , Democratic Republic of the Congo

Search for more papers by this author
Biayi Benaja Martin

Biayi Benaja Martin

Department of Pharmacology , Laboratory of Pharmacognosy , Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of Lubumbashi (UNILU) , Lubumbashi , Democratic Republic of the Congo , unilu.ac.cd

Search for more papers by this author
Bakari Amuri Salvius

Bakari Amuri Salvius

Department of Pharmacology , Laboratory of Pharmacognosy , Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences , University of Lubumbashi (UNILU) , Lubumbashi , Democratic Republic of the Congo , unilu.ac.cd

Search for more papers by this author
Lumbu Simbi Jean Baptiste

Lumbu Simbi Jean Baptiste

Department of Chemistry , Faculty of Sciences , University of Lubumbashi (UNILU) , Lubumbashi , Democratic Republic of the Congo , unilu.ac.cd

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 June 2025
Academic Editor: Kalyani Sen

Abstract

The inhabitants of the village of Mampa have developed a rich corpus of knowledge and practices for treating pathologies using plants that are worthy of preservation, perpetuation, and promotion. They draw on the region’s rich biodiversity, particularly in the Miombo clear forest. However, to date, no documentation of their ethnomedicinal knowledge exists. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2022 and October 2023. It employed a direct, face-to-face interview with the Mampa village population and a guide questionnaire. A total of 400 respondents were included in the study (sex ratio M/F = 0.9; mean age: 48.0 ± 4.0 years; experience: 14.5 ± 2.0 years), and the majority (93.8%) reported that they learned about plants from their families. These individuals mainly use plants as a first-line treatment (100%) and provided information on 38 plants. The most commonly cited species were Anisophyllea pomifera and Brachystegia boehmii with 46 citations, while the most commonly used plant was Landolphia kirkii with six recorded uses. This is the first report of Entandrophragma delevoyi and Pterocarpus brenanii as medicinal plants. Most of these plants are trees, comprising 29 from 23 genera belonging to 24 families, with a notable prevalence of Fabaceae (10 plants). Thirty-two diseases are indicated for treatment, with a predominance of gastrointestinal disorders (8 recipes, 7 plants, 152 citations). The root is the most used organ, with 21 recipes and 14 plants, while decoction is the most common preparation method, with 41 recipes and 19 plants. This study’s findings indicate that a significant number of medicinal plants are used in traditional Mampa medicine to treat various diseases. Some of these species are endemic to the Miombo biodiversity, while others are shared with other cultures and regions. A series of pharmacological studies are currently underway to validate some of the reported plant indications.

1. Introduction

Traditional medicine is the original form of healthcare [13]. The plant has been utilized for centuries by many cultures as a primary source of therapeutic agents, frequently constituting a dominant element within traditional medicinal systems [4, 5]. This remains the case despite the evolution of medicine, with more than three-quarters of drugs currently being of biological origin [6, 7]. The advent of technology has resulted in a decline in the prominence of traditional medicine, leading to its marginalization in some regions, and the emergence of alternative or complementary forms of medicine [8]. Unfortunately, the remedies used in biomedicine have not always met expectations. Resistance has been observed in several therapeutic classes of drugs, and the emergence of metabolic pathologies has prompted the search for new remedies [911].

Traditional medicine is a highly credible alternative to biomedicine in primary healthcare and the search for new molecules due to its frequency of use, effectiveness, acceptability, and accessibility [12]. Eighty-eight percent of WHO member countries report a high level of use of traditional medicine in their healthcare systems, and in many parts of the world, it remains the only form of treatment available [12]. On the other hand, several molecules currently used in therapeutics are of natural origin and derived from ethnomedicinal knowledge [13, 14]. However, while traditional medicine has been documented and archived in certain civilizations, such as China [15], India [16], and Persia [17], it remains poorly preserved and little disseminated in various African regions, even though, in most cases, it constitutes a form of knowledge accumulated over several generations and has long been an integral part of cultural heritage and local traditions.

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as in many African countries, traditional medicine was the only source of healthcare during the precolonial period [1821]. Currently, it remains in great demand in several regions of the country, as attested by various ethnobotanical studies carried out in the various areas of DRC, such as Bukavu [22, 23], Uvira [24], Butembo [25], Kisantu and Mbanza-Ngungu [26], Kasangulu [27], Kinshasa [28], Yakoma [29], Kenge [30], Kasai Oriental [31], and particularly Haut-Katanga [3241].

The results of ethnobotanical studies conducted in Haut-Katanga indicate that 76.4% of the population utilize traditional medicine as a complement to biomedicine [21, 42]. The reasons for turning to traditional medicine in this region are not only accessibility but also the conviction of a certainty of cure [21, 42, 43]. Healing in the region’s main urban areas is culturally mixed, with knowledge passed not only within families but also between ethnic groups, where the Bemba, Luba, and Tabwa are dominant [32, 36, 38].

It should be noted, however, that most of these studies have been carried out in large cities, leaving out the villages in between. Given that the transmission of knowledge in the region is from ancestor to descendant and that in Congolese villages, where knowledge is still transmitted orally, with all the risks this entails, it is often people from the same tribe who live there, we thought it would be interesting to integrate this village-based approach into the search for the value of traditional Katangese knowledge used to cure pathologies. With this in mind, we turned our attention to the village of Mampa, located between the city of Lubumbashi and the town of Kasumbalesa, which borders Zambia. This village is so special because traditional medicine is the only form of primary healthcare available, especially since there are no modern health facilities in the village.

This study is aimed at reporting the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of traditional medicine in the village of Mampa, particularly the plants used as medicinal plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Framework

The study was conducted in the Mampa village (Figure 1).

Details are in the caption following the image
Mampa village, Haut-Katanga, DRC.

The village of Mampa belongs to the Kaponda chiefdom, in the Dilanda groupement, Kipushi territory, Haut-Katanga province, DRC. It was founded in 1925 by Mampa of the Lamba tribe. The village, which lies between 11°40 –12°18  south latitude and 27°18 –27°45  east longitude, covers an area of 453.1 km2 at an altitude of 1240 m, 10 km from the town of Lubumbashi and 83 km from the city of Kasumbalesa, and is inhabited by the Lamba, Tabwa, Tshokwe, Bemba, Sanga, and Luba-Kas peoples. They form around 600–820 households, with an average of 6 people per household. Their main activities are agriculture and the ember trade. Its geographical location is characterized by a tropical climate, with an average annual temperature of 22.4°C and average yearly rainfall of 512.7 mm3. The village has two seasons, with a relatively shorter rainy season from November to April. Characteristic vegetation is of the clear Miombo forest type. The village has no health facilities or schools. All pathologies are treated in the first line of traditional medicine.

2.2. Ethnomedical Data Collection

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. It was conducted among the population living in the village of Mampa between November 2022 and October 2023 in a direct interview using a guide questionnaire. Questions focused on the village population’s practices and attitudes to various diseases and the plants used to treat them. In addition, information relating to some of the sociodemographic characteristics of the population surveyed was also collected. The following formula determined the size of the representative sample [40, 44]:
(1)
where n is the sample size, N is the actual population size (4926), p is the expected proportion of respondents (estimated p at 0.5), tp is the sampling confidence interval (tp = 1.96 given that we set a 95% confidence interval), and y is the margin of sampling error: we set this at 0.05. This yields a household population of 356. We went as far as 400 people, further reassuring the representativeness of our sample.

People living in the Mampa village who had already used medicinal plants to treat illnesses were included in the study, if they had been met in the various households of the Mampa village, that they had agreed to take part in the research and that they had been able to answer the questions at the time of the interviews. The interviews were conducted in Swahili, the language spoken in the village by the entire population, and the local ethnic languages.

2.3. Data Processing and Analysis

The names of the plant species were given by the respondents in the local language during the interviews. The plants were collected in the company of the interviewees. On this occasion, photographs were taken, and herbarium specimens were prepared and deposited at the Kipopo Herbarium, where the plants were formally identified, and given scientific names by the herbarium botanists. The names were updated by comparison with the following databases: Plants of the World Online (https://powo.science.kew.org/), The World Flora Online (http://www.worldfloraonline), or the African Plant Database (https://africanplantdatabase.ch/). Similarly, the geographical distribution of plants is based on POWO data (https://powo.science.kew.org/). Chi-square tests were used to study correlations between qualitative variables. Where some observed numbers were less than 5, the exact Fischer test was used, since the chi-square test is inapplicable in this case. The significance and confidence levels were fixed, respectively, at 5 and 95%. Statistical processing has been performed with GraphPad Prism 10.4.2.

Given the current controversy surrounding ethnobotanical indexes [45], we have used only the terms numbers, relative frequency citation (RFC), usual value (UV), and percentage to assess the results of our investigations quantitatively.

2.4. Ethics Approval, Consent to Participate, Research and Availability of the Study

The Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Lubumbashi (FSPUNILU-DP-BD-062022), reviewed and approved the project proposal and ethical rules. Before the start of data collection, in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Lubumbashi, all respondents (n = 400) were asked to provide voluntary verbal consent. All participants consented to participate in the study in the presence of a representative of the village head and, in some cases, of the nearest neighbor. Informants were automatically excluded from the study if they did not give their informed verbal consent. All respondents were informed that the data collected would be used for academic purposes only.

The preprint version of this study has been available online on Research Square since the 23rd of September 2024 (https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-5116022/v1).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of the People of Mampa Village Who Use Plants to Treat Various Pathologies

There are six main reasons why people in the village of Mampa turn to medicinal plants, with the most cited reasons being family tradition (93.8%), distance from hospitals (25.3%), and certainty of cure (23.8%). Mampa people turn to six primary sources for their herbal remedies, dominated by friends (24.5%) and family members (24%). But long before resorting to herbal remedies, the Mampa people, depending on their pathologies, resort to five practices, of which the analysis of signs, symptoms (35%), and tests derived from the ancestral tradition (24%) are reported by nearly three-fifths of those surveyed (Table 1).

Table 1. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of traditional medicine in the Mampa village.
Factor Men (n = 199) Women (n = 201) Total (n = 400) χ2 test
Nu % Nu % Nu %
Reasons why people use medicinal plants
Family traditions 179 89.9 196 97.5 375 93.8 p = 0.9324
Reliable hospitals far from home 50 25.1 51 25.4 101 25.3 r2 = 0.00075
Certainty of healing 47 23.6 48 23.9 95 23.8
Short treatment times 29 14.6 29 14.4 58 14.5
Low cost of treatment 27 13.6 27 13.4 54 13.5
Easy access to plants 24 12.1 24 11.9 48 12.0
Sources of knowledge about medicinal plants
Friends 48 24.1 50 24.9 98 24.5 p = 0.9627
Family 48 24.1 48 23.9 96 24.0 r2 = 0.00023
Previous experiences 29 14.6 29 14.4 58 14.5
Dream 28 14.1 28 13.9 56 14.0
Traditional healers 24 12.1 24 11.9 48 12.0
Herbalists 22 11.1 22 10.9 44 11.0
Diagnosis of diseases before using plants
Signs and symptoms 170 85.2 194 96.5 364 91.0 p = 0.9063
Traditional tests 48 24.1 48 23.9 96 24.0 r2 = 0.00184
Dream 29 14.6 31 15.4 60 15.0
Biomedical examinations 27 13.6 29 14.4 56 14.0
Ancestral rituals 25 12.6 23 11.4 48 12.0
Knowledge of the risks of using medicinal plants
No 96 48.2 100 49.8 196 49.0 p = 0.9860
Failure to complete the course of treatment leads to relapse 27 13.6 25 12.4 52 13.0 r2 = 0.00003
Failure to control the dose 24 12.1 22 10.9 46 11.5
Worsening of the disease 20 10.1 22 10.9 42 10.5
Initiation to mystical practices 16 8.0 20 10.0 36 9.0
Increase in undesirable effects 16 8.0 12 6.0 28 7.0
Attitude in the event of therapeutic failure after herbal treatment
Do nothing 45 22.6 51 25.4 96 24.0 p = 0.9729
Use fetishists 7 3.5 5 2.5 12 3.0 r2 = 0.00010
Use traditional healers 13 6.5 11 5.5 24 6.0
Change plant 44 22.1 44 21.9 88 22.0
Use plant mixtures 29 14.6 29 14.4 58 14.5
Double the dose 31 15.6 32 15.9 63 15.8
Use of biomedicine 30 15.1 29 14.4 59 14.8
  • Abbreviation: Nu, number of informants.

Although most of the people in the village of Mampa use plants to treat their illnesses and, in most cases (49%), they are not aware of the risks involved, some of them are aware of certain risks associated with the use of medicinal plants. Of the four risks mentioned, not completing the cure (13%) or aggravating the illness (11.5%) are the two most frequently cited reasons. The Mampa population is aware that the use of medicinal plants does not always produce the expected results and that there have been cases of therapeutic failure. When such cases occur, seven attitudes are observed by the Mampa villagers, of which the two most frequently mentioned are either to do nothing (24%) or to change the plant (22%) (Table 1).

3.2. Knowledge of Medicinal Plants Among the Population of Mampa Village

In total, 38 plants are used by the population of Mampa village to treat 33 pathologies, with Anisophyllea pomifera (46 citations) being the most cited plant and Brachystegia boehmii (5 uses) being the most used plant. The characteristics of these plant relate to their family, morphological, and geographical types, as well as the characteristics of the medicinal recipes derived from their use (Table 2).

Table 2. Medicinal plants used by the people of Mampa village.
Plant species (family)MT Local name (ethnicity) GT Local medical uses UP,PF No. of citations n = 400 (RFC) No. of uses u = 32 (UV)
Albizia julibrissin Durazz (Fabaceae)h Musamba mvula (f) N Syphilisk,s 21 (0.053) 3 (0.0938)
Mungesha ngesha (d) Coxarthrosisk,s 10 (0.025)
Poisoning fisht,v 03 (0.008)
  
Anisophyllea pomifera Engl. & Brehmer  (Anisophylleaceae)h Lufunga (f) CA Urinary infections n,r 46 (0.115) 5 (0.1563)
Diabetesm,q 10 (0.025)
Malariak,n,q 05 (0.013)
Coughk,n,k 04 (0.010)
Hypertensionk,n,q 03 (0.008)
  
Bauhinia variegata L (Fabaceae)h Ndunda wa bululu (f) C Constipationp,q 31 (0.078) 1 (0.0313)
  
Brachystegia boehmii Taub (Fabaceae)h Musanga (f) CA-EA Constipationn,s 46 (0.115) 5 (0.1563)
Gonorrhean,q 20 (0.050)
Diarrheal,q 10 (0.025)
Coughm,r 15 (0.038)
Woundsm,n,r 18 (0.045)
  
Buddleja davidii Franch (Scrophulariaceae)i Sambwe sambwe (f) B Hair lossk,r 13 (0.033) 2 (0.0625)
Woundk,r 05 (0.013)
  
Butea monosperma (Lam) Kuntze (Fabaceae)h Mukombo (f) C Snakebitel,t 12 (0.030) 1 (0.0313)
  
Chrysobalanus icaco L. (Chrysobalanaceae)i Munazi (f) R Anemiak,r 35 (0.088) 2 (0.0625)
Kapempe (a) Intestinal wormsk,r 27 (0.068)
  
Cratoxylum cochinchinense (Lour) Blume (Hypericaceae)h Mukute (f) B Diarrheak,q 36 (0.068) 2 (0.0625)
Kafifi (g) Diarrheak,q 18 (0.045)
  
Crossopteryx febrifuga (G Don) Benth (Rubiaceae)h Pelapori (f) P Feverl,q 20 (0.050) 3 (0.0938)
Malarial 17 (0.043)
Diarrheal 19 (0.048)
  
Cupaniopsis anacardioides (A Rich) Radlk (Sapindaceae)h Mukonda mbazo (f) D Tooth decayl,q 22 (0.055) 2 (0.0625)
Decreased libidon,q 20 (0.050)
  
Damnacanthus indicus CF Gaertn (Rubiaceae)i Zanza (f) C Swelling paink,r 11 (0.028) 2 (0.0625)
Sansa (a) Cancerk,r 10 (0.025)
  
Dimocarpus longan Lour (Sapindaceae)h Mululu (f) B Abdominal painl,q 21 (0.053) 1 (0.0313)
  
Diospyros virginiana L. (Ebenaceae)h Bukolongo (f) K Syphilisk,r 11 (0.028) 1 (0.0313)
  
Dombeya rotundifolia (Hochst) Planch (Malvaceae)h Kiku (f) F Vomitingl,r 21 (0.053) 1 (0.0313)
  
Elaeodendron orientale Jacq (Celastraceae)h Kakula (f) M Anemial,r 12 (0.030) 1 (0.0313)
  
Entandrophragma delevoyi De Wild (Meliaceae)h Kimuti Leza (f) E Coughm,q 37 (0.093) 4 (0.1250)
Malariam,q 8 (0.020)
Rheumatismm,q 6 (0.015)
Woundm,q 3 (0.008)
  
Flueggea suffruticosa (Pall) Baill (Phyllanthaceae)i Mupeto wa lupe (f) A Swollen fingersn,t 11 (0.028) 1 (0.0313)
  
Gomphocarpus sinaicus Boiss [Syn Asclepias sinaica (Boiss.) Muschl] (Apocynaceae)j Kapofwe (b) I Coxarthrosiso,q 21 (0.053) 2 (0.0625)
Kasobololo (f) Gastritiso,q 19 (0.048)
  
Harungana madagascariensis Lam ex Poir (Hypericaceae)h Kape (f) P Rheumatismm,r 8 (0.020) 2 (0.0625)
Goutm,r 15 (0.038)
  
Juglans nigra L (Juglandaceae)h Mukena mbulo (f) K Decreased libidom,r 41 (0.103) 2 (0.0625)
Diarrheam,r 12 (0.030)
  
Kigelia africana (Lam) Benth (Bignoniaceae)h Muvungu lume (f) P Decreased libidoo,r 21 (0.053) 2 (0.0625)
Urinary infections n,r 05 (0.013)
  
Landolphia kirkii Dyer ex Hook.f (Apocynaceae)i Mabungo (a) E Fevern,q 42 (0.105) 6 (0.1875)
Painn,q 10 (0.025)
Hemorrhoids†n,q 18 (0.045)
Malarian,q 10 (0.025)
Diabetesn,q 08 (0.020)
Anemian,q 06 (0.015)
  
Parinari curatellifolia Planch. ex Benth (Chrysobalanaceae)h Mupundu (b) T Diarrheal,q 15 (0.038) 1 (0.0313)
  
Phoebe lanceolata (Nees) Nees (Lauraceae)h Kibobo (a) B Diarrheak,q 32 (0.080) 2 (0.0625)
Kakolwa (f) Woundl,q 30 (0.075)
  
Piliostigma reticulatum (DC.) Hochst (Fabaceae)h Ukifumbe (f) S Tooth decayl,q 11 (0.028) 2 (0.0625)
Hemorrhoids†n,q 02 (0.005)
  
Piscidia piscipula (L.) Sarg (Fabaceae)h Mulama (f) L Abdominal paink,r 11 (0.028) 1 (0.0313)
  
Prunus armeniaca L. (Rosaceae)h Kasombo (f) G Gonorrheak,r 10 (0.025) 1 (0.0313)
  
Psidium cattleianum Sabine (Myrtaceae)h Bupubili (f) 0 Gastritism,q 20 (0.050) 1 (0.0313)
  
Pterocarpus angolensis DC (Fabaceae)h Mukunda mbazu (f) F Goutn,q 16 (0.040) 2 (0.0625)
Diabetes mellitusm,q 15 (0.038)
  
Pterocarpus brenanii Barbosa & Torre (Fabaceae)h Kakula (f) H Cancerm,q 39 (0.098) 4 (0.1250)
Hepatitism,q 12 (0.030)
Malariam,q 06 (0.015)
Feverm,q 04 (0.010)
  
Pueraria montana (Lour) Merr (Fabaceae)j Ubupundu (f) C Dysenteryk,q 12 (0.030) 1 (0.0313)
  
Quercus suber L. (Fagaceae)h Ndale (d) J Ascitesl,r 22 (0.055) 2 (0.0625)
Kilonde (f) Ascitesm,r 19 (0.048)
  
Rhododendron simsii Planch (Ericaceae)i Muda (f) B Dental plaquek,q 22 (0.055) 2 (0.0625)
Coughk,q 10 (0.025)
  
Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae)h Mono (f) H Abdominal painkr 13 (0.033) 3 (0.0938)
Mbalika (e) Hemorrhoidsn,q 10 (0.025)
Mudia ntondo (c) Bronchitisl,q 12 (0.030)
  
Senegalia polyacantha (Willd) Seigler & Ebinger (Fabaceae)h Kibombolo (f) Q Sexual weaknessm,q 40 (0.100) 4 (0.1250)
Diabetes mellitusm,q 15 (0.038)
Diarrheam,q 20 (0.050)
Painful menstruationm,q 21 (0.053)
  
Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels (Myrtaceae)h Masanfwa (f) B Abdominal paino,p,u 31 (0.078) 2 (0.0625)
Snakebiten,t 10 (0.025)
  
Tetradium ruticarpum (A Juss) TG Hartley (Rutaceae)h Kinsungwa (b) B Swelling paink,r 35 (0.088) 2 (0.0625)
Kinsungu (f) Headacheso,s 15 (0.038)
  
Viburnum odoratissimum Ker Gawl (Viburnaceae)i Kifubya (f) B Abdominal paink,q 21 (0.053) 2 (0.0625)
Kishimya mulilo (b) Woundsl,q 20 (0.050)
  • Note: Ethnicity—Bemba: a, Lamba: b, Luba-kas: c, Luba-kat: d, Swahili: e, Tabwa: f, Zela: g. Geographical types (GT)—Asia-temperate: A, Asia-temperate–Asia-tropical: B, Asia-temperate–Asia-tropical–Australia: C, Australia: D, CA-EA: E, CA-SA: F, Central Asia: G, EA: H, NA: I, NA-WE: J, Northern America: K, Northern America–Southern America: L, SA: M, South Asia: N, South America: O, TA: P, TA-SA: Q, WA-CA: R, WA-EA: S, TA-MA: T. Morphological types—tree: h, shrub: i, subshrub: j. Mode of preparation—decoction: q, maceration: r, infusion: s, pillage: t, mastication: u. Used part—root: k, stem root: m, stem bark: l, leaves: n, fruit: o, rhizome: p, seeds: v. Plants used in mixtures (in equal parts)—hemorrhoids: †; urinary infections: ∗relative frequency citation (RFC) = number of people who cited the plant (ni) out of the number of people consulted during the survey (n). Usual value (UV) = number of uses reported for a plant (Ui) out of the total number of uses reported for all plants in the entire study (u). Results in bold are expressed as a percentage.

3.3. Morphological and Geographical Type

The medicinal plants inventoried in the village of Mampa can be classified into three morphological types, with the tree type representing 76.3% of the total (Figure 2). They can be further divided into 22 geographical types, with plants endemic to Asia representing the majority. However, African endemic plants account for 47.4% of all plants, including 13 from the DRC (Figure 3).

Details are in the caption following the image
Morphological types of medicinal plants from Mampa village.
Details are in the caption following the image
Geographical types of medicinal plants in Mampa village (type with more than one taxon). Legend: CA, Central Africa; SA, Southern Africa; MA, Madagascar; EA, East Africa; NA, North Africa; WA, West Africa.

3.4. Family and Local Name

The 38 plants are distributed among 23 genera belonging to 24 families. The most prevalent family is Fabaceae, which accounts for 26.3% of the plants, followed by four families with two plants each: the remaining families are represented by only one plant each (Figure 4). These plants are named in seven local languages of the DRC, of which Tabwa is the most represented with 36 plants. It is followed by Bemba and Lamba with four plants each (Figure 5).

Details are in the caption following the image
Botanical families of medicinal plants from the Mampa village (n = 38). Legends: The intensity of the color corresponds to the number of plants in the family concerned, according to the scale shown in the figure.
Details are in the caption following the image
Local languages used to name medicinal plants in Mampa village.

3.5. Used Part and Mode of Preparation

A total of 79 single plant medicinal recipes and two mixed plant medicinal recipes were derived from the 38 plants using seven plant parts. The root was the most utilized plant part, with 21 recipes and 14 plants, followed by the stem bark, which was used in 19 recipes and with 15 plants. The root bark was the third most utilized plant part, with 18 recipes and 10 plants (Figure 6).

Details are in the caption following the image
Parts of the medicinal plants from Mampa village.

The seven organs utilized in a multitude of medicinal preparations are processed via six distinct methods, with decoction being the predominant approach, accounting for 41 recipes and 19 plants (Figure 7). This is followed by maceration, which is employed in 26 recipes and 15 plants.

Details are in the caption following the image
Methods of preparing herbal remedies in the village of Mampa.

3.6. Ailments Treated by Plants Inventoried in Our Experimental Framework

The 79 recipes from 38 plants inventoried in this study are used in the treatment of 32 ailments where abdominal pain (12 recipes, 7 plants, 152 citations), diarrhea (7 recipes, 4 plants, 104 citations), hemorrhoids (4 recipes, 3 plants, 96 citations), decreased libido (3 recipes, 3 plants, 76 citations), and cough (3 recipes, 2 plants, 72 citations) are treated by at least 3 medicinal recipes (Figure 8).

Details are in the caption following the image
Signs and ailments treated by traditional medicine in the Mampa village.

3.7. Previous Medicinal Knowledge of the Organs of Inventoried Plants

A review of the existing literature (Table 3), focusing on the last medicinal uses of the 38 plants used in the Mampa village, reveals the following:
  • i.

    Eight plants had previously been reported as medicinal plants in Katanga, of which five (Anisophyllea boehmii, Brachystegia boehmii, Crossopteryx febrifuga, Harungana madagascariensis, and Landolphia kirkii) have the same medicinal uses in Mampa as in the existing literature from the region and three (Parinari curatellifolia, Pterocarpus angolensis, and Senegalia polyacantha) have new medicinal uses.

  • ii.

    Three plants are reported as medicinal plants in regions of the DRC other than Katanga and for ailments other than those for which they are used in the village of Mampa: Kigelia africana, Ricinus communis, and Syzygium cumini.

  • iii.

    Nine plants have the same medicinal use in Mampa as in other regions outside the DRC: Albizia julibrissin, Bauhinia variegata, Buddleja davidii, Cupaniopsis anacardioides, Damnacanthus indicus, Juglans nigra, Phoebe lanceolata, Piliostigma reticulatum, and Rhododendron simsii.

  • iv.

    Two plants, Entandrophragma delevoyi and Pterocarpus brenanii, are reported for the first time as medicinal plants. Both are endemic to Africa, one of which, E. delevoyi, is singularly endemic to the DRC. These plants constitute the particularity of the Mampa village from the point of view of ethnomedicinal uses of plants.

  • v.

    Sixteen plants are reported as medicinal plants in other regions outside the DRC and for uses other than those for which they are used in the village of Mampa: Butea monosperma, Chrysobalanus icaco, Cratoxylum cochinchinense, Dimocarpus longan, Diospyros virginiana, Dombeya rotundifolia, Elaeodendron orientale, Flueggea suffruticosa, Gomphocarpus sinaicus, Piscidia piscipula, Prunus armeniaca, Psidium cattleianum, Pueraria montana, Quercus suber, Tetradium ruticarpum, and Viburnum odoratissimum (Table 3).

Table 3. Extract from the available literature on medicinal uses of plants in the Mampa village.
Plant Country Previous medicinal uses Source
Albizia julibrissin China Root: Swelling and pain in the lungs, shin ulcers, wounds, depression [46]
Leaves: Inflammations [47]
Stem bark: Ulcers, abscesses, burns, hemorrhoids, and fractures [48]
Korea Leaves: Ichthyotoxics [49]
  
Anisophyllea pomifera DRC: Lubumbashi Root: Diabetes, abdominal pain, tooth decay, malaria, mental disorders, hypertension, cough [35, 36, 50]
  
Bauhinia variegata India Stem bark and flowers: Obesity, dysentery, hemorrhage [51]
India Stem bark: Diarrhea, dysentery, constipation, goiter, leprosy, tumor, diabetes, helminth, ulcer, obesity [52, 53]
  
Brachystegia boehmii DRC: Lubumbashi Stem bark: Dysentery, diarrhea, abdominal pain, dysmenorrhea, gonorrhea, tuberculosis, typhoid fever [39]
Zimbabwe Stem bark: Abdominal pains, antivenom, back pain, cataracts, heart problems, mental problems, sore eyes, toothache, constipation and lumbago in ruminants [54]
Zimbabwe Leaves: Wounds [55]
Mozambique Root bark: Abdominal pains [56]
Zambia Root bark: Dizziness and diarrhea [57]
  
Buddleja davidii China Root: Headache, wound [58]
Republic of Korea Leaf: Malaria, inflammatory pathologies, wound [59]
  
Butea monosperma India Stem bark: Helminth, infertility, diabetes, sexual dysfunction [60]
India Roots: Impotency, elephantiasis, snakebite [61]
  
Chrysobalanus icaco Nigeria Leaves: Diabetes, obesity [62]
  
Cratoxylum cochinchinense Brazil Leaves: Diabetes [63]
  
Crossopteryx febrifuga DRC: Lubumbashi Stem bark: Sexual dysfunction, diabetes, malaria, hemorrhoids, diarrhea, cough, and abdominal pain [3638, 41]
  • Angola
  • Burkina Faso
  • Congo
  • Ghana
  • Guinea
  • Ivory Coast Mozambique
  • Nigeria
  • Zimbabwe
Stem bark: Malaria, cough, asthma, pneumonia, tuberculosis, sterility, gastrointestinal complaints, diabetes, wound infections, epilepsy, fever [64]
  
Cupaniopsis anacardioides Australia Fruit, leaves: Cold, fever, inflammation [65]
  
Damnacanthus indicus China Root: Cancer [66]
  
Dimocarpus longan China Stem bark: Fatigue [67]
  
Diospyros virginiana India Root: Dysentery, diarrhea, fevers, hemorrhoids [68]
  
Dombeya rotundifolia RSA Stem bark: Skin infections [69]
  
Elaeodendron orientale Madagascar Stem bark: Chest infections, venereal illness, and scorpion fish poisoning [70]
  
Entandrophragma delevoyi NR NR NR
  
Flueggea suffruticosa Russia Leaves: Lumbago, rheumatic disease, numbness of the limbs, impotence, infantile paralysis, and indigestion [71]
  
Gomphocarpus sinaicus Egypt Fruit: Diarrhea, rhinorrhagia, metrorrhagia [72]
  
Harungana madagascariensis Cameroon Root bark: Gonorrhea, leprosy, hemorrhoids, and to facilitate childbirth [73]
DRC: Katanga Root bark: Diabetes, rheumatism, sexual dysfunction, high blood pressure [36, 41, 43]
Juglans nigra United States Root bark: Diarrhea, bilious, cramp colic, and cancers [74]
  
Kigelia africana South Africa Fruits: Solar keratosis, malignant melanoma, dysentery, worm infestations, pneumonia, toothache, malaria, diabetes, venereal diseases, convulsions, antidote for snakebite, post parturition hemorrhage, solar keratoses, and skin cancer [75]
Botswana STDs [75]
Nigeria Inflammation diseases [75]
DRC: Lubero Epilepsy, hemorrhoid [76]
  
Landolphia kirkii DRC: Lubumbashi Leaves: Malaria, seizures [34, 37]
  
Parinari curatellifolia DRC: Lubumbashi Root bark: Malaria, diarrhea, STDs, hemorrhoids, kunde [37]
  
Phoebe lanceolata China Root: Wound, cough [77]
  
Piliostigma reticulatum Ivory Coast Stem bark: Diarrhea [78]
Senegal Stem bark: Ulcers, boils, toothache, wounds, syphilitic cancer, gingivitis, and diarrhea [79]
  
Piscidia piscipula Mexico Root: Nerve pain, migraine, insomnia, anxiety, fear, and nervous tension [80]
  
Prunus armeniaca Algeria Root: Coughs, bronchitis, asthma, and to soothe inflamed or irritated skin [81]
  
Psidium cattleianum Brazil Root bark: Constipation, diarrhea [82]
  
Pterocarpus angolensis Angola, India Leaf: Gastrointestinal and urine-genital ailments, fertility problems [83, 84]
Root bark: Respiratory conditions and skin disorders [83, 84]
DRC: Katanga Root bark: Malaria, diarrhea, hemorrhoids, wounds, anemia, diabetes, tooth decay, hepatitis, fever, otitis [34, 3638]
  
Pterocarpus brenanii NR NR NR
  
Pueraria montana Root: Diabetes, gastroenteritis, HTA [85, 86]
  
Quercus suber Morocco Stem bark: Diabetes, gastroenteritis, diarrhea, asthma, hemorrhoids, gonorrhea, gastritis, pyrexia [87]
Morocco Root bark: Parkinson’s disease, hepatoprotective diseases, gastric ulcers [87]
  
Rhododendron simsii China Root: Bronchitis, cough, rheumatoid arthritis, pain, and skin ailments [88]
Ricinus communis India Root: Diabetes, bacterial infections, asthma [89]
DRC: Beni and Lubero Root: Diabetes [76]
India Leaf: Diabetes, helminths, convulsions, ulcers [89]
  
Senegalia polyacantha India Root bark: Snakebites, leishmaniasis [90]
Benin Root bark: Livestock’s diseases [91]
Sudan Root bark: STDs, wound, stomach disorders [92]
DRC: Katanga Root bark: Malaria, diarrhea, diabetes, female STDs [34]
  
Syzygium cumini Philippines, India Stem bark: Dysentery, anemia, gingivitis and mouth ulcerations, diarrhea, diabetes [93]
DRC: Kisangani Fruit: Diabetes [94]
Leaf: Dysentery, stomatitis, vomiting, hemorrhoids [95]
  
Tetradium ruticarpum China Rhizome: Gastritis, indigestion, vomiting, gastroduodenal ulcer nausea, neural headache, heart failure, dysmenorrhea [96, 97]
  
Viburnum odoratissimum China Root: Rheumatism [98]
  • Note: Pathologies in bold are those found both in accessible literature and in the Mampa village.
  • Abbreviations: HTA, high blood pressure; STD, sexually transmitted disease.

3.8. Important Medicinal Plants in Mampa

In this study, we consider important local medicinal plants to be those that meet one of three criteria: (i) plants with the highest number of citations, (ii) plants with the highest number of uses, and (iii) plants that have been identified as medicinal for the first time.

The most frequently cited plants are Anisophyllea pomifera and Brachystegia boehmii, with 30 citations each. In contrast, the most frequently utilized plants are Landolphia kirkii (six uses) and Brachystegia boehmii (five uses). This study marks the first time E. delevoyi and Pterocarpus brenanii have been identified as medicinal plants (Figure 9).

Details are in the caption following the image
Plants particularly highlighted by the study.

3.9. The Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Interviewees

Four hundred resource persons were interviewed as part of this study, with an average age of 48 ± 4 years (ranging from 24 to 72 years). The male-to-female ratio was 0.99. The respondents were either household representatives (93.75%), herbalists (2.50%), or traditional healers (3.75%). The respondents’ mean experience in using medicinal plants was found to be 9 ± 2 years (range: 2–31 years). The participants were engaged in seven primary occupations, with agriculture and livestock breeding representing over 60% of the total. In over 50% of cases, the respondents had only completed elementary school (Table 4).

Table 4. Sociodemographic characteristics of resource persons interviewed.
Category Household (n = 375) Herbalists (n = 10) THs (n = 15) Total (n = 400) χ2 test
Nu % Nu % Nu % Nu %
Age
20–30 34 9.1 0 0 1 6.7 35 8.75 p = 0.3762
30–40 155 41.3 2 20 1 6.7 158 39.5 r2 = 0.0989
40–50 115 30.7 4 40 3 20.0 122 30.5
50–60 59 15.7 2 20 7 46.7 68 17
> 60 12 3.2 1 10 3 20.0 16 4
Experience (year range)
0–5 15 4.0 0 0 1 6.7 16 4 p = 0.5179
5–10 170 45.3 1 10 3 20.0 174 43.5 r2 = 0.07289
10–15 168 44.8 3 30 7 46.7 178 44.5
> 15 22 5.9 6 60 4 26.7 32 8
Main activity
Agriculture 30 8.0 0 0 0 0.0 30 7.5 p = 0.7862
Breeding 155 41.3 0 0 0 0.0 155 38.75 r2 = 0.00637
Crafts 119 31.7 0 0 0 0.0 119 29.75
Herbalist 0 0.0 10 100 0 0.0 10 2.5
Housework 61 16.3 0 0 0 0.0 61 15.25
THs 0 0.0 0 0 15 100.0 15 3.75
Trade 10 2.7 0 0 0 0.0 10 2.5
Gender
Female 192 51.2 6 60 3 20.0 201 50.25 p = 0.0412
Male 183 48.8 4 40 12 80.0 199 49.75 r2 = 0.1282
Level of education
None 61 16.3 0 0 0 0.0 61 15.25 p = 0.6408
Primary 198 52.8 7 70 8 53.3 213 53.25 0.03864
Secondary 115 30.7 3 30 6 40.0 124 31
University 1 0.3 0 0 1 6.7 2 0.5
  • Note: Results in bold are expressed as a percentage.
  • Abbreviation: Nu, number of informants.

4. Discussion

4.1. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Traditional Medicine Using Plants in the Mampa Village

The interviews conducted as part of this study revealed that all subjects consulted utilized traditional medicine, predominantly based on plant use. This result is consistent with the findings of a recent study conducted in Lubumbashi, which revealed that 76.4% of the population utilizes traditional medicine, with a notable prevalence of plant-based remedies [21]. This observation has been previously documented in ethnobotanical studies conducted in Haut-Katanga, although these studies were oriented toward specific pathologies [3234, 35, 3638, 40, 41].

This study identified family tradition as the primary rationale for the utilization of plants in traditional medicine, a finding that aligns with those of previous research studies [99102]. The impact of family tradition on the uptake of traditional medicine is a complex phenomenon. These include the following: (i) The practice may be regarded as a cultural heritage that has become an integral part of the family’s identity and heritage [103]. An alternative perspective is that it may be viewed as a means of symbolizing continuity, respect for ancestors, and the link with cultural roots, which may serve to reinforce the feeling of belonging to a community [104]. Thirdly, some families may perceive this practice as a means of achieving greater autonomy and control over their well-being [105]. Fourthly, the practice may have given rise to a positive family tradition passed down through generations. Alternatively, it may serve as an element of family cohesion and reinforcement of the unity of a community, as observed by parents and relatives. In this context, the certainty of cure, identified by this study as a reason for the use of traditional medicine by nearly 24% of the population surveyed (Table 1), may appear to be a secondary justification for the use of traditional medicine based on family practice.

The second most frequently cited rationale for using traditional medicine in this study was the distance to healthcare facilities (Table 1). The lack of physical accessibility to biomedicine has been previously identified as a rationale for using traditional medicine. This is particularly evident in studies conducted in various African countries, including Uganda [106], Rwanda [107], Ethiopia [108, 109], Kenya [101], Nigeria [110], Cameroon [111, 112], Zambia [113], and the DRC, particularly in Haut-Katanga [21]. Although poor accessibility is a common and widely reported reason for the use of traditional medicine in many regions, in the case of the village of Mampa, traditional medicine is the only alternative, given that the village lacks a health structure where modern medicine is practiced. This situation serves to illustrate the role of traditional medicine in primary healthcare in the village of Mampa. These considerations can also be correlated with the sources of knowledge evoked by the population interviewed on the use of traditional medicine, where friends, family, and previous experience figure prominently (Table 1).

It is evident that the diagnostic procedures employed in traditional medicine in the Mampa village are not distinctive when compared to the methods of diagnosis documented in the literature on the diagnosis of pathologies in African traditional medicine [114, 115]. This is particularly the case in the context of the Katanga region [38, 43]. Notably, clinical signs represent the primary foundation for diagnosis in traditional medicine within the Mampa village (91%). The utilization of clinical signs for the diagnosis of illnesses in traditional medicine offers several advantages, including (i) the establishment of a link between traditional medicine and biomedicine, the latter also employing clinical signs to connect manifestations to specific drugs, and (ii) the facilitation of the development of an experimental procedure, particularly in clinical studies, aimed at validating traditional medicine practices [116]. However, this approach has the disadvantage of exposing the patient to the risk of incomplete treatment, of which only a minority of the population surveyed (13%) was aware (Table 1).

Regarding the knowledge of the risks associated with the use of plants in traditional medicine in the village of Mampa, it is notable that several risks identified in this study have been previously documented in other studies [117, 118]. However, some risks have not been previously reported. These include the risk of plant confusion during harvesting, intoxication by the metallic trace elements (TMEs) that specific plant concentrate, and the ecological risk. It is particularly noteworthy that nearly half of the population is unaware of the potential risks associated with using medicinal plants. This could have a detrimental impact on the social stability of the village, particularly given that therapeutic failures may be attributed to witchcraft or mystical practices.

In the event of therapeutic failure when using medicinal plants, two attitudes are predominant in the Mampa village: inaction (24%) and changing the plant (22%). Those who elect to do nothing in the event of therapeutic failure adhere to the belief that there is no alternative to traditional medicine, as they perceive this approach to be infallible. This viewpoint has also been documented in prior research conducted in the region [21, 43]. This indicates the degree of belief in traditional medicine held by this segment of the population, who have likely never encountered a genuine case of therapeutic failure. The remaining majority opinion is to change the plant. This approach is analogous to that of biomedicine, wherein a change in medication is observed in the event of therapeutic failure. This suggests a spectrum of treatment options within traditional medicine in Mampa. Consequently, the mention of two plants in the management of pathology does not necessarily imply that they are used alternatively but that they may also be employed as a palliative measure. It is important to consider this information when collecting ethnobotanical data on traditional Katangan medicine.

4.2. A Variety of Medicinal Plants From the Mampa Village

Traditional medicine in the village of Mampa uses 38 plants. Most of these plants are endemic Asian trees belonging to the Fabaceae family, most of which are named in Tabwa (Table 2).

As evidenced by various ethnobotanical studies conducted in the region [33, 34, 38, 43, 119], the predominance of trees among medicinal plants in Haut-Katanga is a well-documented phenomenon. In contrast to other morphological types, using trees for therapeutic purposes offers several advantages. First, the availability of raw materials is not limited by seasonality, allowing for year-round utilization. Second, using different organs can increase the versatility of the therapeutic supply. Third, the low probability of extinction of highly utilized plants is another advantage.

Many plants inventoried in this study originate from Asia, but only three plants are endemic to the DRC. This differs from various ethnobotanical studies conducted in the Katangese region [36, 39, 120, 121]. The high prevalence of nonendemic medicinal plants in the village of Mampa may indicate a culturally influenced tradition of traditional medicine in this village, potentially shaped by Asian cultural influences. The presence of an Indian agricultural enterprise in the region for nearly two decades supports this hypothesis. However, this hypothesis may be called into question not only by the fact that all the medicinal plants listed are named in local languages, with a predominance of Tabwa, an ethnic group reputed to be among the healing peoples of Katanga, but also by the fact that the acquisition of medicinal knowledge in this village is, in half the cases, the result of a family tradition, dating back to the creation of the village, according to the information gathered during our interviews (Table 1). In the latter case, the plants in question would not have been formally identified as endemic to Katanga.

The preponderance of Fabaceae among the plants inventoried during this study agrees not only with previous ethnomedicinal studies carried out in the area covered by the Miombo open forest [56, 122126] but also with ethnomedicinal studies carried out in Katanga [36, 38, 39, 43, 127]. This numerical predominance of Fabaceae is globally observed across all plants in sub-Saharan Africa and has been attributed to their ability to capture atmospheric nitrogen, enabling them to grow in any soil type, whether nutrient-rich or nutrient-poor [28, 128].

In the Mampa village, the majority of plants used for therapeutic purposes (94.7%) are wild species. This finding is consistent with the results of previous ethnobotanical studies conducted in the same region [35, 36, 3840, 127, 129]. The predominant reliance on wild plants as medicinal resources presents both advantages and risks, necessitating a balanced approach. The availability of wild plants without the need for intensive cultivation minimizes ecological impact by reducing pesticide use and preserving local biodiversity. Furthermore, their traditional medicinal applications are often deeply rooted in local knowledge, making them accessible to rural communities, particularly in areas with limited medical infrastructure, such as Mampa village. However, excessive dependence on these uncultivated species poses several risks. The overexploitation of natural resources can have severe consequences, including a decline in population species numbers, which in turn can hinder the ability of these populations to regenerate. This decline can even lead to the extinction of some species. The biochemical composition of wild plants varies significantly due to environmental factors, which complicates the standardization of treatments and raises concerns regarding safety and therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, their occurrence in remote locations may limit access, exacerbating disparities in healthcare availability. Lastly, the absence of environmental control can expose these plants to contaminants such as pollutants and toxins, which may alter their medicinal properties. Therefore, while wild plants play a crucial role in traditional pharmacopeia, their sustainable utilization requires a carefully managed approach that ideally integrates cultivated species to ensure long-term preservation and accessibility.

4.3. Pathologies, Diseases, Signs, or Conditions Treated by Medicinal Plants in the Mampa Village

The results of our surveys indicate that four ailments or conditions are the most prevalent in the Mampa village, with a total of 32 identified. These are gastrointestinal disorders, diarrhea, hemorrhoids, and low libido. Fortunately, the local traditional medicine has plants that can treat these conditions, with seven plants for gastrointestinal disorders, four plants for diarrhea, and three plants for libido and hemorrhoids, respectively (Figure 8).

At the national level, the 10 most prevalent and lethal pathologies in the DRC are malaria, tuberculosis, lower respiratory tract infections, neonatal diseases, diarrheal diseases, strokes, ischemic heart disease, road trauma, hypertensive heart disease, and cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases [130]. The findings of our surveys indicate that the medicinal knowledge of the Mampa village population may be associated with three of the 10 leading causes of mortality: diarrhea (four plants), malaria (one plant), and lower respiratory tract infections (two plants). These two scenarios, at the local and national levels, illustrate the efficacy of traditional medicine in addressing significant health concerns. Furthermore, these findings underscore the significance of traditional medicine in rural communities, particularly in the context of primary healthcare, as evidenced by numerous prior studies [131133].

The village of Mampa has been documented to have a variety of ethnomedicinal uses, which have also been observed in other regions of the country and the world.

The ethnobotanical uses reported later in Katanga (DRC) are also observed in the Mampa village. These include the decoction of Anisophyllea pomifera Engl. & Brehmer roots, used in Kipushi (Haut-Katanga, DRC) to treat diabetes [36], and that of Harungana madagascariensis root bark, used in the Kafubu valley (Haut-Katanga) against rheumatism [36, 41]. These same uses are reported in the Mampa village. Similarly, the leaves of Landolphia kirkii are employed in Lubumbashi as a decoction to treat malaria [34, 37]. Additionally, the stem barks of Parinari curatellifolia are utilized in Lubumbashi as a decoction for managing diarrhea [37]. Pterocarpus angolensis stem bark is employed in Lubumbashi as a decoction for treating diabetes [34, 36, 37]. Ultimately, Senegalia polyacantha stem bark is employed in Lubumbashi as a decoction or infusion for managing diarrhea and diabetes, respectively [34, 36]. The uses above were similarly documented in the Mampa village as part of the present study.

Other medicinal applications, documented in both Katanga and other regions, were observed in the Mampa village during our research. These include Crossopteryx febrifuga stem bark, which has been used as a decoction to treat malaria and diarrhea in Kipushi in the DRC [36, 38, 41] and in other countries such as Guinea, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe [64]. Similarly, Brachystegia boehmii leaves are employed in the form of a compress in the Likasi region of Katanga, DRC [39], and as a decoction in Zimbabwe [55] for the treatment of wounds. Furthermore, its ashes are utilized as a therapeutic agent against gonorrhea in the regions as mentioned above [54].

Other ethnopharmacological applications of Mampa have been documented in other global cultures situated outside the DRC. For example, Buddleja davidii roots are used in China against wounds [58] and the Republic of Korea [59]. Butea monosperma roots are used in India against snake venom [61]. In China, Damnacanthus indicus roots are used against cancerous pathologies [66]. The root barks of Juglans nigra are employed in the United States for the management of diarrheal pathologies [74]. The roots of Phoebe lanceolata are utilized in China to manage wounds [77]. The stem bark of Piliostigma reticulatum is used in Senegal [79] and Ivory Coast [78] for the treatment of diarrheal disorders. Based on the findings of our investigation, which are presented in this study, the same ethnopharmacological uses are reported for the same plant in the Mampa village.

The above-cited consensuses, obtained from individuals of disparate backgrounds, demonstrate that there is reason to accord some degree of credibility to the findings of our investigation. Furthermore, they suggest that the results of prospective biological experiments conducted in a laboratory setting are likely to corroborate these uses [38, 39].

4.4. Medicinal Recipes From Mampa Village

The population has identified 32 pathologies in the Mampa villages and developed 81 recipes to treat these conditions, of which two employ two plants and 79 utilize a single plant per recipe. The root is used in 21 recipes and 18 recipes for root bark (see Figure 6), while decoction (see Figure 7) is the most commonly utilized preparation method and plant part.

The preponderance of roots as the part used is also reported in some targeted ethnomedicinal studies previously carried out in the region [32, 34, 39, 41, 119, 134]. In contrast, other targeted ethnomedicinal studies have indicated that the leaf is the most commonly used part [33, 35, 37, 40]. The lack of consensus on which organ is the most widely used in traditional medicine in Katanga may be justified by the diversity of localization of bioactive phytochemical compounds within the plant, which can vary from one pathology to another. The utilization of roots offers certain advantages, including providing primary metabolites, vitamins, and minerals such as carbohydrates, pectin, calcium, and vitamin A [135]. Furthermore, the roots can provide access to secondary metabolite groups, including anthocyanins [136], flavanones and flavanols, lipids [136], and phenylpropanoids and organo-heterocycles [127]. However, reliance on the root exposes the plant to extinction, as it is in high demand. It would, therefore, be advantageous for the residents of Mampa to receive instruction in techniques that facilitate the natural regeneration of plant material, which is frequently utilized for therapeutic purposes.

In local traditional medicine, decoction is the preferred method of preparation, as evidenced by the findings of several studies conducted in Haut-Katanga [3234, 35, 3641, 119, 134].

In the context of traditional medicine, the preparation of a medicinal formula via decoction offers several advantages. Firstly, this preparation method is optimal for extracting active compounds that remain stable at high temperatures. Secondly, the process does not require the use of sophisticated or costly apparatus, thereby facilitating its implementation on a vast scale. Thirdly, the method is relatively straightforward and does not necessitate the involvement of a skilled operator, which is advantageous in traditional settings. Fourth, it is a cost-effective method that can be readily implemented in a domestic setting. However, decoctions are not an optimal method for the extraction of heat-sensitive components, as the boiling process can lead to their degradation [40, 137139]. Nevertheless, decoction should not be the default preparation method in a specific local culture. The optimal preparation method should be determined on an individual basis, considering the specific pathology and the nature of the remedy. Only through rigorous biological experimentation can the rational use of each preparation method be accurately assessed.

4.5. Essential Medicinal Plants Discovered in the Mampa Village

The most frequently cited plants in this study are Anisophyllea pomifera and Brachystegia boehmii, while the most widely used plant is Landolphia kirkii. E. delevoyi and Pterocarpus brenanii represent the plants first reported as medicinal plants. It is thus possible to consider these plants as those which have been singled out by this study in the context of Mampa village.

Anisophyllea pomifera is a tree species endemic to the southwestern part of Africa, including countries such as Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia, Burundi, and the DRC (https://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000537325). In Tanzania, Anisophyllea pomifera is utilized as a means of deterring rodent pests that prey on maize and beans, and its fruit is consumed [140, 141], as is the case in Burundi [140]. In the DRC, in the southern Katanga region, the decoction of Anisophyllea pomifera’s leaves, roots, and stem bark is utilized for the treatment of dental caries, malaria, abdominal discomfort, mental health disorders, hypertension, and respiratory conditions, including coughs [34, 35]. Some of these applications, in addition to indications against urinary tract infections and diabetes, were documented in the Mampa village during our various surveys (Table 2). In vitro studies have demonstrated that the plant’s methanolic leaf extract exhibits antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus mutans MTCC 890 (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): 31.25 μg/mL) and Lactobacillus acidophilus MTCC 447 (MIC: 62.5 μg/mL) [35]. Additionally, the methanolic root extract demonstrated in vitro antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum, with an IC50 of 22.1 μg/mL [50]. Additionally, the root was found to contain saponins, tannins, and terpenoids, while the leaves were also found to contain alkaloids and steroids. However, this plant has the same vernacular name (Fungo in Sanga and Lufunga in Tabwa) as Anisophyllea boehmii Engl., with which it shares certain medicinal uses, notably in the management of diabetes and digestive disorders in Haut-Katanga [36]. This suggests a potential case of confusion in the use of these two plants in traditional Katangese medicine. Subsequent simultaneous pharmacognostic and phytochemical studies on both plants would be beneficial to reach a definitive conclusion.

Brachystegia boehmii Taub is an endemic African tree species that is native to the following countries: The species is found in Angola, Botswana, Burundi, Malawi, Mozambique, the DRC, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe (https://powo.science.kew.org). The ethnobotanical uses of this plant vary depending on the country and the organ in question. In Mozambique, the roots are employed in a decoction to assuage agitation in patients [142], whereas the leaves are utilized in a decoction to alleviate abdominal discomfort and the effects of snake venom [143]. In Tanzania, the roots are used in a decoction to treat impotence and wounds [54]. In Zimbabwe, the leaves are employed in a decoction for the treatment of wounds, constipation, lumbago, back pain, and dysmenorrhea [55, 142]. Additionally, macerated stem bark is indicated for the management of sexually transmitted infections [144]. In the DRC, the roots are employed as a macerate to treat wounds and coughs, whereas the stem barks are utilized as a decoction to address dysentery, diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and gonorrhea [40]. This plant is used globally for the same purposes in the Mampa village (Table 2).

To our knowledge, the only pharmacological evidence reported to date concerns the leaves. Chloroformic leaf extract showed in vitro antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Escherichia coli, with a DZI ranging from 12 to 21 mm [55]. The ethanolic extract of the leaves showed only weak anti-inflammatory activity of 48% on COX-1 and antioxidant activity with an IC50 of 46 μg/mL [145]. The primary metabolite metabolomic profile of fresh leaves provides information on the presence of 39 primary metabolites, including seven amino acids (glycine (Gly), alanine (Ala), valine (Val), glutamate (Glu), γ-amino butyric acid (GABA), isoleucine (Ile), and threonine (Thr)), two organic acids (threonate and glycerate), and two sugars (galactose and glycerol) [146].

Landolphia kirkii Dyer ex Hook.f is a tree species endemic to southern and central Africa, occurring in the following countries: The species is found in the following countries: Burundi, Central African Republic, DRC, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Somalia, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. In some regions, various parts of the plant are employed in multiple applications. The fruit is utilized primarily as food in all countries where the plant is endemic, except the DRC, where its decoction is employed for the treatment of constipation [32] and malaria [147]. In South Africa, the roots are employed as an infusion to alleviate dental discomfort [148], diarrhea, and blood purification [149]. In Kenya [150, 151] and Mozambique [56], the plant is used as a decoction to relieve digestive disorders. In the DRC, the plant is used as an infusion to combat urogenital schistosomiasis and intestinal worms [32]. The leaves are primarily utilized in the DRC as a decoction to treat convulsions [50] and as a maceration to combat malaria [50, 152]. The antimalarial use of the plant, as documented in the village of Mampa, is similarly observed in other regions of the DRC [152] and other parts of the continent [153].

In a previous study, the methanolic extract of the leaves demonstrated antiplasmodial activity against local isolates of Plasmodium falciparum with an IC50 of 9.9 μg/mL [50]. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the only validated in vitro use of the leaves to date. No biological studies have been conducted on the roots and stems. However, the methanolic fruit extract is active in vitro against Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 21059, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883 with MICs ranging from 6.3 to 24 μg/mL. Nevertheless, it exhibits weak antioxidant activity, with an IC50 value greater than 100 μg/mL [154]. A previous phytochemical screening of the fruit revealed the following characteristics of the plant: The chemical composition of the plant includes hexadecanoic acid, 9-octadecanoic acid, tetradecanoic acid, 9,12-octadecanoic acid, and 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid [155]. The ash content is reported as follows: The mean value was 2.9 ± 0.0, and the protein content was 12.7 ± 0.3 mg/kg. The results indicated that the sample contained 2.1% ± 0.20% moisture, 0.9% ± 0.1% ash, and 1.8% ± 0.2% fat. The total phenolic content (TPC) was found to be 1250.33 mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per gram of mollified fruit, while the total flavonoid content (TFC) was determined to be 2019.0 mg of rutin equivalent (RE) per gram of mollified fruit [156].

E. delevoyi De Wild is a tree species indigenous to the DRC, Rwanda, and Burundi. To the best of our knowledge, the only data available in the literature concern phytochemistry. These findings indicate that the hexanic extract of the bark of this plant contains azadirone, 14β,15β-epoxyazadirone, 6α-acetoxyazadirone, 6α-acetoxy-14β,15β-epoxyazadirone, and 6α-acetoxy-14β,15β-epoxyazadiradione. Additionally, the phytochemical profile of the bark includes 4-secotirucalla-4(28),7,24-triene-3,21-dioic acid, delevoyin A (3,4-secotirucalla-4(28),7,24-trien-3-oic acid), delevoyin B (6α-acetoxy kihada lactone), limonoid, 11β-acetoxygedunin, and delevoyin C [157]. In the village of Mampa, Entandrophragma delevoyi is employed to treat malaria. Despite the absence of prior documentation regarding this utilization in other regions, a range of Entandrophragma plants are used in traditional medicine as a malaria treatment. These include Entandrophragma angolense, Entandrophragma candollei, Entandrophragma caudatum, Entandrophragma congolense, Entandrophragma palustre, and Entandrophragma utile [158]. The findings of this study thus allow for the inclusion of E. delevoyi among the various plants of this genus.

Pterocarpus brenanii Barbosa & Torre is a tree species endemic to Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Despite a lack of documentation attesting to its presence in the DRC, the proximity of the village of Mampa to Zambia may provide a rationale for its inclusion in the village’s traditional medicinal practices. Furthermore, despite the absence of ethnobotanical studies on this topic in the accessible literature, two medicinal uses in the village of Mampa (malaria and cancer) have been documented in various plant of the Pterocarpus genus [159, 160]. It would be beneficial to conduct further research to determine whether these two pathologies may serve as pharmacotaxonomic markers for the entire Pterocarpus genus.

The two plants, Pterocarpus brenanii and E. delevoyi, are particularly interesting candidates for further ethnopharmacological studies so that their medicinal uses in the Mampa village can be validated. The same can be said of plants Parinari curatellifolia, Pterocarpus angolensis, and Senegalia polyacantha, which seem to have some uses specific to the Mampa village.

4.6. Limitations of the Study

Despite the methodological efforts to address the significant concerns that arise in ethnomedicinal studies, particularly data reliability, community access, plant identification, and logistical challenges, this study does not claim to have exhausted all knowledge related to the interaction between plants and the Mampa village population. The study does not give the cutus on the use of these medicinal plants. The study was limited to documenting their medicinal use, thus paving the way for ethnopharmacological studies that should prove their efficacy and safety, thus validating these uses. At a later stage, it will be necessary to complete our knowledge of the other uses of these plants by these peoples (cultural, artistic, nutritional, etc.). Subsequent studies will also have to examine the therapeutic peculiarities of each family, especially since, in the Mampa village, knowledge is acquired and transmitted within the family. Moreover, given that therapeutic expertise in the Mampa village is transmitted orally, there is a risk of variability related to the memory and will of the informants. The influence of the use of plants in the treatment of diseases can cause damage to biodiversity. Since this study did not address this aspect, future studies should focus on it.

5. Conclusion

This study illustrates that the Mampa village is inhabited by a diverse range of plant species, which are vital for maintaining the village’s health system. These plants represent the sole alternative for primary treatment of the various pathologies encountered by the local population. This ethnomedical knowledge is acquired and practiced within the family unit. Some of the plants employed as remedies in this village are shared with other African cultures, while others appear to be exclusive to the region. This new knowledge thus significantly contributes to the existing body of traditional therapeutic knowledge in Katanga, particularly in the Congo more widely. These findings highlight the necessity for developing techniques to preserve the integrity of the Miombo forest, in which the Mampa village is located, and to educate local populations in this regard. Furthermore, the value of indigenous users’ knowledge of phytotherapy merits further investigation through phytochemical and biological studies, with the objective of developing phytomedicines.

Nomenclature

  • CA
  • Central Africa
  • CI
  • citation index
  • EA
  • East Africa
  • Fr
  • fruit
  • FU
  • form of use
  • GT
  • geographical type
  • Lv
  • leaves
  • MA
  • Madagascar
  • MCI
  • medical capability index
  • MT
  • morphological type
  • NA
  • North Africa
  • Nc
  • number of citations
  • NEA
  • Northeast Africa
  • NH
  • herbarium number
  • Nt
  • number of plant
  • Rb
  • root bark
  • Rz
  • rhizome
  • SA
  • Southern Africa
  • Sb
  • stem bark
  • Sd
  • seed
  • TA
  • tropical Africa
  • TH
  • type of hemorrhoid
  • UP
  • used part
  • WE
  • West Africa
  • WP
  • whole plant
  • Ethics Statement

    Ethical review was provided by the Department of Pharmacology—Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences—University of Lubumbashi (FSPUNILU-DP-BD-062022).

    Consent

    About the people interviewed, oral informed consent was obtained before the initiation of data collection in all cases.

    Disclosure

    There is no third-party data. It is our original research data. All concerned individual authors have agreed to the publication of the outcome of this study as stated under ethical consideration and authors’ contribution.

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    Author Contributions

    B.C.V. designed and coordinated this research and drafted the manuscript. B.B.M. and B.C.V. carried out experiments and data analysis. B.C.V., B.A.S., and L.S.J.B. conceived the study and participated in research coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    No funding was received for this manuscript.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to thank the Kipopo Herbarium for identifying plant species. They also thank the traditional healers, herbalists, and Lubumbashi households for acquiring ethnobotanical data.

      Data Availability Statement

      Since 23 September 2024, this study has been published as a preprint on Research Square (10.21203/rs.3.rs-5116022/v1). The data in support of the conclusions of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

        The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.