Volume 2025, Issue 1 2241780
Research Article
Open Access

Modelling Population Dynamics of Substance Abuse in the Presence of Addicted Immigrant With Real Data of Rehabilitation Cases

Jamiu Adeyemi Ademosu

Jamiu Adeyemi Ademosu

Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics , Ladoke Akintola University of Technology , Ogbomoso , Nigeria , lautech.edu.ng

Department of Mathematical Sciences , Lagos State University of Science and Technology , Ikorodu , Nigeria

Search for more papers by this author
Samson Olaniyi

Corresponding Author

Samson Olaniyi

Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics , Ladoke Akintola University of Technology , Ogbomoso , Nigeria , lautech.edu.ng

Search for more papers by this author
Sulaimon Femi Abimbade

Sulaimon Femi Abimbade

Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics , Ladoke Akintola University of Technology , Ogbomoso , Nigeria , lautech.edu.ng

Search for more papers by this author
Furaha Michael Chuma

Furaha Michael Chuma

Department of Physics , Mathematics and Informatics , Dar es Salaam University College of Education , Dar es Salaam , Tanzania , duce.ac.tz

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Chinedu Ogbonna

Richard Chinedu Ogbonna

Department of Computer Science and Mathematics , Evangel University Akaeze , Akaeze , Ebonyi State , Nigeria

Search for more papers by this author
Ramoshweu Solomon Lebelo

Ramoshweu Solomon Lebelo

Department of Applied Physical Sciences , Vaal University of Technology , Vanderbijlpark , South Africa , vut.ac.za

Search for more papers by this author
Kazeem Oare Okosun

Kazeem Oare Okosun

Department of Mathematics , University of Kansas , Lawrence , Kansas , USA , ku.edu

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 March 2025
Academic Editor: Manzoor Hussain

Abstract

Excessive intake or injection of substances, namely, medications, alcohol, and other harmful drugs, has resulted into unimaginable serious consequences, including mental health and social problems. In an attempt to understand the dynamics of substance abuse and forestall its potential spread in the population, a novel model based on nonlinear system of ordinary differential equations is formulated and analysed in this study. The model takes into account, among other important features, the influx of addicted immigrant and rehabilitation of individuals affected by substance abuse. Least squares method with minimization-constrained function is employed to fit the model with the real data of substance-induced mental cases under rehabilitation. Conditions that guarantee the existence and global asymptotic stability of steady states are established, and a key threshold quantity which measures the potential spread of substance abuse influence in a community comprising susceptible and prudent populations is determined. Sensitive parameters of the model are identified, and their effects on the dynamics of substance abuse transmission are investigated with a view to suggesting possible effective measures against the harmful spread of substance abuse in the population.

1. Introduction

Substance or drug abuse refers to misuse or excessive consumption of substance for either therapeutic or nontherapeutic effects on the mind or body of the users. Some of the psychoactive substances usually misused include but not limited to alcohol and medications such as analgesics and cough syrups, as well as some illegal narcotic drugs such as cocaine, cannabis, and heroin. Following the report by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1], at a global scale, an estimated 3.3 million deaths each year are due to harmful consumption of alcohol. In addition, between 129 and 190 million people use cannabis in the world, making it the most abused psychoactive substance. It is most frequently used in the African Region with consumption rates between 5.2% and 13.5%, especially in West and Central Africa.

In response to the difficult experiences of life, people often resort to using psychoactive substances to placate their emotions. In the process, individuals become continuously dependent on the substances, since emotional needs cannot be completely satisfied. This eventually leads to the problem of addiction and a wide range of negative consequences, including health problems, social problems, legal cases, and mental health issues. Particularly, addiction to psychoactive substances can cause damages to organs such as the lung, liver, kidney, and heart and may lead to multiorgan system failure [2, 3]. Injection of these substances through shared syringes has been reported to contribute to a high risk of contracting some deadly viruses like HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. Social problems associated with substance abuse include increased risk of motor vehicle accidents, heavy financial burden, job loss, and relationship issues. Mental disorders like depression, anxiety, psychosis, or schizophrenia are the prominent negative byproducts of substance abuse [13].

The need to nip the indiscriminate use of psychoactive substances in the bud is, therefore, imperative in order to avert the myriad of dangerous consequences experienced by members of the society. To do this, some attempts have been made by researchers in constructing mathematical models to analyse the dynamics of substance abuse transmission and other related studies (see, for example, [410]). Sharomi and Gumel [11] qualitatively studied public health’s impact of smoking dynamics by designing and analysing a compartmental model that described subpopulations of individuals based on their smoking status and incorporated mild and chain smoking populations as well as the impact of smoking-related illnesses in the community. Public-oriented intervention strategies and policies were provided for minimizing the problematics drug abuse in a population through a dynamic modelling study presented by Rossi [12]. In a bid to establish the effect of policing in the control of drug epidemic, Njagarah and Nyabadza [13] investigated how drug barons contribute to the prevalence of drug abuse circulation in the population and showed how law enforcement could be used to reduce the prevalence using mathematical modelling approach. Similarly, authors in [14] developed and analysed a drug abuse transmission model incorporating criminal law with optimal control measures. It was shown that the criminal law gives a significant decrease in the sizes of mild and heavy drug addicts in the population.

Moreover, in the study by Memarbashi and Pourhossieni [15], a model that described the spread of illicit drug in a population structured by education status of heroin users was proposed and analysed to assess the significance of educational programs on drug abuse control. Islam and Biswas [16] applied optimal control theory to study the dynamics of drug abuse and showed that educational programs and proper medical treatment as well as family-based care could be effective in reducing the negative effects of drug addiction in the shortest period of time. Akanni et al. [17] studied a model for illicit drug use in a population using dynamical system theory and suggested measures to mitigate the spread of the menace in the population. A model for the spread of drug addiction with counseling and imprisonment as preventive strategies was proposed and studied in [18]. Similarly, Abidemi [19] incorporated triple time-dependent optimal control measures, namely, treatment, corrective measure, and enlightenment campaign, into a nonlinear model of illicit drug use dynamics based on optimal control theory framework. In [20], a model on smoking dynamics was framed and incorporated the effects of media awareness with optimal control measures to achieve smoking cessation. Isa et al. [21] considered a model for drug use dynamics capturing the assumption that recovered individuals may not remain resistant to the illicit drug use. In [22], the authors framed a mathematical model to investigate the dynamics of addiction to substance abuse among women population with optimal control and showed the significance of parameters on the addict generation number. Djilali et al. [23] proposed and analysed a spatiotemporal model incorporating distributed delay to explore the consumption of heroin in a heterogeneous environment. In Zhang et al.’s [24] study, deterministic and stochastic smoking epidemic models were used to examine social interactions among different smoking levels of individuals in the population, and it was shown that proper monitoring of initial sizes of smoking population could be an effective strategy to control smoking prevalence. In an attempt to understand the influence of one of the most dangerous among drug abuse—methamphetamine (MPT) misuse—on society and restrict the surge in the population of MPT users, Abbas et al. [25] introduced cases of four-dimensional models to describe the dynamics of MPT abuse using harmonic mean type incidence term and taking relapse and the effects of migrants into consideration. The formulated models were analysed to explore the future dynamics of MPT usage in the population.

In the present study, a new model fitted to the real data of substance-induced mental cases under rehabilitation and which incorporates the influx of immigrants addicted to substance abuse is designed. The model is qualitatively and quantitatively assessed to provide insightful findings arising from the asymptotic dynamics of the substance abuse transmission and show how some key estimated parameters affect the behaviours of psychoactive substance users in the population. Throughout this study, substance and drug will be used interchangeably. The full description of the model formulation is given in Section 2. Conditions for existence and stability of substance abuse–free and substance abuse–present steady states are established in Section 3. Model-data fitting and analysis of sensitive parameters with simulations are carried out in Section 4, while in Section 5, concluding remarks are provided.

2. Model Formulation

Six classes of individuals in a population are considered depending on their behavioural status, these include the susceptible class, denoted by S(t); light psychoactive substance users, denoted by L(t); heavy user population, denoted by H(t); mentally ill class, denoted by M(t); substance abuse–induced mental cases under rehabilitation, denoted by R(t); and prudent or stayers class (individuals who choose to stay away from psychoactive substance use due to proper education), denoted by P(t). Therefore, the total population of individuals at any time t is given by
The susceptible class is assumed to increase at a recruitment rate by birth or immigration, denoted by Π, excluding fractions, a and b, of recruitment rate for immigrant addicted to substance abuse and recruitment rate for prudent class, respectively, keeping in mind that 0 ≤ a + b ≤ 1. Since susceptible individuals are not drug users themselves, they can be negatively influenced by subpopulations of light and heavy substance users. Hence, the susceptible class is decreased by the standard force of influence, β(L + ρH)/N, where β is the effective substance abuse influence rate and ρ ≥ 1 denotes modification parameter for a higher level of influence by the heavy users compared to the light users. The population of susceptible can also be reduced at the per capita natural death rate, μ. It follows that the time evolution of susceptible population is given by
()
The population of light drug users is generated by standard force of influence, β(L + ρH)S/N, and increased by reactivation of individuals under rehabilitation with standard force of influence, denoted by βr(L + ρH)/N, where βr is the effective substance abuse reactivation rate. Due to unsuccessful rehabilitation, the population is further increased by a fraction, (1 − θ) > 0, of some individuals who exit the rehabilitation class at exit rate ω. The population is decreased at the rates α, γ, and τ, due to transition to populations of heavy users, mentally ill individuals, and rehabilitation class, respectively. The population can also be reduced at the per capita natural death rate, μ. Hence, the population dynamics of the light drug abuse users is described by
()
Heavy substance abuse class is populated by immigration of addicted users at recruitment rate aΠ and by progression of light users at a rate α. The population of heavy users is reduced by transition to mentally ill class and rehabilitation class at rates σ and ε, respectively. The population is further decreased at natural and substance abuse–induced mortality rates μ and δ, respectively. Thus, the rate of change of this population is given by
()
Mentally ill class becomes populated by transition of light and heavy users at rates γ and σ, respectively. The class is reduced due to per capita natural and substance abuse–induced death rates μ and δ, respectively. Therefore, the rate of change of mentally ill population is given by
()
The population of individuals under rehabilitation is generated by light and heavy users at rehabilitation rates τ and ε, respectively. The population is decreased by reactivation of force of substance abuse influence βr(L + ρH)/N and further decreased by exit from rehabilitation at a rate ω and natural death rate μ. The time evolution of the rehabilitation class is given by
()
Finally, the prudent population is generated at both recruitment rate bΠ and successful fraction θ of some individuals exiting the rehabilitation class at the exit rate ω. The natural death rate for prudent class is also μ. Hence, the dynamics of the prudent population over time is given by
()
Following the aforementioned assumptions and putting all the above equations together, the time evolution of the overall population dynamics of the substance abuse transmission is described by the following six-dimensional system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The full descriptions of the variables and parameters associated with the system are provided in Table 1. The schematic diagram depicting the flow of the system is given in Figure 1.
()
with the state variables at instant of time t = 0 given by
()
Table 1. Variables and parameters of the substance abuse transmission model (7).
Variable Description
S Susceptible population liable to be influenced
L Light drug users
H Heavy drug users
M Mentally ill population due to drug abuse
R Population under rehabilitation
P Prudent population who abstains from drug abuse
Parameter
Π Recruitment rate
a Fraction of recruits who are heavy users by immigration
b Fraction of recruits who are prudent
β Effective substance abuse influence rate
ρ Modification parameter for higher level of influence
βr Effective substance abuse reactivation rate
ω Exit rate due to rehabilitation
θ Successful fraction of exit rate due to rehabilitation
1 − θ Unsuccessful fraction of exit rate due to rehabilitation (recidivist rate)
α Progression rate of light users to heavy users
γ, σ Transition rates of light and heavy users to mentally ill class
τ, ε Rehabilitation rates for light and heavy users, respectively
μ Natural death rate
δ Substance abuse–induced death rate
Details are in the caption following the image
Schematic diagram for the population dynamics of substance abuse transmission with Λ = Π(1 − (a + b)), f1 = β(L + ρH)/N, and f2 = βrf1/β.

2.1. Well-Posedness of the Model

It should be mentioned that the nonnegativity of the parameters of the model (7) is valid since the model represents the dynamics of substance abuse among human population. Thus, it is necessary to verify the well-posedness of the model. To do this, the following positivity, boundedness, existence, and uniqueness results are established.

2.1.1. Nonnegativity of Solutions

Theorem 1. Given the positive initial conditions (8), the solutions S(t), L(t), H(t), M(t), R(t), and P(t) of the substance abuse model (7) are positive for all t > 0.

Proof 1. Employing the approach used in [2628], one sees from the model (7) that

()

It is clear from (9) that all the rates of change on the bounding cone 6 are nonnegative. As a consequence, nonnegativity of solutions of the substance abuse model (7) is established since the vector field is directed inward on all the bounding planes.

2.1.2. Invariant Region

Theorem 2. The region Δ, given by

is positively invariant with respect to the substance abuse model (7).

Proof 2. Adding all the equations in the system (7) yields

so that

It follows that

Taking the limsup as t⟶∞ gives N(t) ≤ Π/μ. Further, if N(0) ≤ Π/μ, then N(t) ≤ Π/μ. Hence, the region Δ is positively invariant.

2.1.3. Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions

The substance abuse model (7) with initial conditions (8) can be written as an initial valued system of the form
()
where w = (S, L, H, M, R, P) and

Definition 1. F(w) is Lipschitz continuous in w if there exists a constant L > 0 such that

()

Theorem 3. There exists a unique solution w(t) of the system (10) analogous to the substance abuse model (7).

Proof 3. It suffices to show that F(w) satisfies the Lipschitz condition given in Definition 1. Considering the first equation of the model (7) and keeping in mind that NΠ/μ in the positively invariant region Δ, one can show that

Similarly, considering other equations of the model (7), it can be shown that

As a consequence, F(w) satisfies the Lipschitz condition

where L = max{(β(1 + ρ) + μ), (β + βr + b), (σ + ε + μ + δ), (μ + δ), (βr(1 + ρ) + ω + μ), μ}.

3. Existence and Stability of Steady States

In this section, conditions for existence and stability of substance abuse–free and substance abuse–present steady states are analysed.

3.1. Substance Abuse–Free Steady State

Substance abuse–free steady state is obtained by simultaneously solving System (7) at equilibrium, such that the light and heavy users of psychoactive substance are absent in the population (i.e., L = 0, H = 0). By this, it also follows that the fraction of recruitment rate for addicted immigrant must vanish (i.e., a = 0), while the fraction of recruitment rate for prudent population exists (i.e., b ≠ 0). In this case, the substance abuse–free steady state of the system (7), denoted by , is given by
()
where S0 = Π(1 − b)/μ, L0 = 0, H0 = 0, M0 = 0, R0 = 0, and P0 = bΠ/μ.
The condition for local stability of the substance abuse–free steady state can be determined based on the effective reproduction number of the model. In the context of substance abuse population dynamics, the effective reproduction number, denoted by , is defined as the average number of secondary psychoactive substance users that are influenced by either one light or heavy user in the population consisting susceptible and prudent individuals (see [29]). Using the next-generation operator approach [30] and considering only the last five equations of the system (7), the matrices F (for the substance abuse incidence terms) and V (of the transition terms), evaluated at , are given, respectively, by
()
()
where K1 = α + γ + τ + μ, K2 = σ + ε + μ + δ, K3 = μ + δ, and K4 = ω + μ. Therefore, the effective reproduction number, which is the maximum eigenvalue of FV−1, denoted by , is obtained as
()

It must be mentioned that K1K2K4 > (1 − θ)ω(αε + τK2) by algebraic simplifications and since 1 − b > 0, thereby making both numerator and denominator of in (15) positive. This ensures the positivity of the effective reproduction number of the model. Hence, the following local stability result is claimed, using Theorem 2 of [30].

Theorem 4. The substance abuse–free steady state, denoted by (12), of the model (7) is locally asymptotically stable if and unstable if .

The practical implication of Theorem 4 is that the incidence of substance abuse can be effectively curbed in the population if the effective reproduction number .

3.2. Substance Abuse–Present Steady State

Here, the existence of substance abuse–present steady state of the system (7) is explored in the presence of psychoactive substance users in the population. Let the substance abuse–present steady state be designated by and the substance abuse standard force of influence be represented by λ∗∗ = β(L∗∗+ρH∗∗)/N∗∗, where N∗∗ = Π/μ at steady state. Thus, the resulting solution after solving the system (7) as a function of λ∗∗ simultaneously gives
()
and the cubic polynomial
()
where

It is observed that the coefficient A1 of the cubic polynomial is positive since K1K2 > (τK2 + αε) by algebraic simplification. Then, invoking the spirit of Descartes’ sign rule [31], the number of positive roots of the cubic polynomial (17) depending on the threshold quantity is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Descartes’ rule conditions for maximum of two positive real roots based on .
Cases A1 A2 A3 A4 Threshold conditions Number of positive roots Steady states existence
(i) + + + + 0 exists
(ii) + + + 1 exists
(iii) + + 1 exists
(iv) + + + 2 and coexist
(v) + + 2 and coexist
The existence of only one positive root in both Cases (ii) and (iii) of Table 2 indicates that Model (7) has unique substance abuse–present steady state if the associated effective reproduction number exceeds unity, that is, . In addition, the existence of two positive roots appearing in Cases (iv) and (v) of Table 2 is pointing to the bistability of substance abuse–free and substance abuse–present steady states at , where both coexist. This bistability makes the control of drug abuse problem difficult as long as immigrant heavy drug users are present in the population (a > 0), even when is below unity. However, in the absence of immigrant heavy drug users (a = 0), it follows that A4 = 0 and the cubic polynomial (17) is reduced to the quadratic equation of the form
()
where A2 and A3, respectively, now become

As a consequence of the absence of immigrant heavy drug users fraction, it can be seen that A2 > 0 and A3 > 0 if , and by Descartes’ rule, only exists. In this case, bistability of both steady states and will no longer occur at , where may be globally asymptotically stable as would be shown in the next subsection. However, if when a = 0, only substance abuse–present steady state exists, regardless of the sign of A2.

3.3. Global Stability Analysis

In accordance with the fact that global asymptotic dynamics is an important performance metric for dynamical systems, this subsection seeks to examine how the dynamics of the substance abuse system (7) behaves around the substance abuse–free and substance abuse–present steady states.

3.3.1. Global Stability of Substance Abuse–Free Steady State

The global asymptotic stability of the substance abuse model (7) around the substance abuse–free equilibrium point (12) of the model is explored using the method adopted in [32, 33]. This is done by rewriting the substance abuse model (7) in a compact form as follows:
()
where and It should be noted that represents the non–drug user class, while = (L, H, M) is the drug user class of the model. For convenience, let the substance abuse–free equilibrium be represented by , so that its global asymptotic stability is examined under the condition that the following properties are preserved.

P1. For , is globally asymptotically stable

P2. , , for where is a Metzler matrix evaluated at .

Theorem 5. The substance abuse–free equilibrium of the system (7) is globally asymptotically stable provided Conditions P1 and P2 are met.

Proof 4. The functions and are obtained from (19) as follows:

()
()

Since evaluated at gives

()
then means that
()

Solving System (23) simultaneously yields

()

One sees that (S, R, P)⟶(S0, R0, P0) as t⟶∞, satisfying Property P1, and that is globally asymptotically stable. It remains to establish Property P2.

The M-matrix whose off-diagonal entries are nonnegative is obtained as

()

Then, solving for gives

()

It can be seen that despite 0 ≤ SS0 and 0 ≤ RR0, indicating that Property P2 is not satisfied. However, one can only achieve except that a = 0, satisfying Property P2. Therefore, it suffices to say that the equilibrium point, , of the substance abuse model is globally asymptotically stable in the absence of addicted immigrant drug users. This completes the proof.

Practically, Theorem 5 is suggesting that the eradication of substance abuse dynamics in the population cannot be possible as long as immigrant psychoactive drug users are present in the population. As a consequence, controlling substance abuse transmission in the population can only be possible if strict measures can be placed on the immigration of addicted psychoactive drugs users into the population.

3.3.2. Global Stability of Substance Abuse–Present Steady State

It has been shown that regardless of the presence or absence of the addicted immigrant drug users (i.e., whether a = 0 or a ≠ 0), the substance abuse–present steady state exists at . Hence, the investigation of the global asymptotic stability of the substance abuse model (7) around is carried out as follows.

Theorem 6. The substance abuse–present steady state, , of the system (7) is globally asymptotically stable provided the associated effective reproduction number exceeds unity, .

Proof 5. Using the following positive definite Lyapunov function of quadratic type (see [3436]),

()

It is should be noted that N = S + L + H + M + R + P and N∗∗ = S∗∗ + L∗∗ + H∗∗ + M∗∗ + R∗∗ + P∗∗. Therefore, the Lyapunov function (27) becomes

()

Since the time derivative of (27) is given by

()
where , therefore, it follows that
()

Recall that dN/dt = ΠμNδ(H + M); then, (30) becomes

Consequently, implying that the time derivative of the Lyapunov function is negative semidefinite. Furthermore, provided S = S∗∗, L = L∗∗, H = H∗∗, M = M∗∗, R = R∗∗ and P = P∗∗. Then, the largest invariance set for which is the singleton In the spirit of LaSalle’s invariance principle [37], it follows that the substance abuse–present steady state is globally asymptotically stable.

4. Data Fitting and Sensitivity Analysis

Here, the substance abuse model (7) is fitted to real data of mental cases under rehabilitation due to psychoactive substance abuse. Yearly data of cases spanning 10 years from 2013 to 2022 are collected from a rehabilitation health facility, Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. The least squares fitting method with minimization-constrained function, fmincon, implemented in MATLAB is used to fit the substance abuse model (7) to the cumulative cases under rehabilitation. This is achieved by minimizing the sum of squared errors, as in [3842], given by
()
where is the solution associated with the rehabilitation class of the model at time t and , denoting unknown parameters to be fitted. represents the real data of cases under rehabilitation, and the total number of data points is given by n = 10. According to the 2022 data on Lagos State of Nigeria [43], the total population and the average life expectancy are estimated as N = 15,387,600 and 53 years, respectively. Hence, the natural death rate μ = 1/53 per year. The recruitment rate is estimated as Π = μN, so that Π = 290,332 humans per year. To minimize subject to the substance abuse model (7), the initial condition for rehabilitation class is obtained from the real data as R0 = 308, while the initial conditions for the remaining state variables are chosen as S0 = 12,000,000; L0 = 1,411,924; H0 = 0; M0 = 0; and P0 = 5,000,000. Following the algorithm for fitting deterministic model to real data as provided in [38, 41], the result for data fitting of the substance abuse model (7) is displayed in Figure 2, while Table 3 gives the corresponding fitted values of the parameters, so that the effective reproduction number . The fitted parameter values obtained in this study differ from the similar parameter estimates obtained from previous studies that involved data fitting in drug abuse modelling due to different data collections (see, for example of such previous related studies, [4447]).
Details are in the caption following the image
Substance abuse model fitted to real data of cases from Lagos, Nigeria.
Table 3. Values of the parameters for the substance abuse model (7).
Parameter Value Source
Π 290,332 Estimated [43]
a 0.01 Assumed
b 0.1472 Fitted
β 0.0183 Fitted
ρ 1.5 Assumed
βr 0.001 Assumed
ω 0.0006 Assumed
θ 0.5606629 Fitted
α 0.00750351 Fitted
σ 0.009001 Fitted
γ 0.0011 Assumed
τ 0.0000953025 Fitted
ε 0.002649 Fitted
μ 0.01887 Estimated [43]
δ 0.0002 Assumed

4.1. Analysis of Sensitive Parameters

Since the value of the effective reproduction number of the substance abuse model fitted to the real data is estimated to be less than one, that is, , this implies that substance abuse problem in Lagos, Nigeria, is not endemic yet, but caution should be taken to ensure that is not greater than one. Hence, it is imperative to perform the sensitivity analysis of the model in order to know how changes in the parameters of the model affect the effective reproduction number. With sensitivity analysis, the impact of some critical parameters on the dynamics of the substance abuse transmission model (23) can be determined, providing deeper insights into prevention and control efforts for mitigating the influence of substance abuse. Thus, sensitivity analysis will help guide against the outbreak of substance abuse problem in the population. To achieve this, the use is made of the forward sensitivity index defined as follows [27, 48].

Definition 2. The normalized forward sensitivity index of any variable, , depending on such parameter, p, is defined as

()

Consequently, the sensitivity indices of all parameters associated with the effective reproduction number, , given in (15), are shown in Table 4, using (32). The parameters with positive sensitivity index signal that any rise (fall) in their values will cause a rise (fall) in the value of . On the contrary, the parameters with negative sensitivity index signal that any increase (decrease) in their values will lead to decrease (increase) in . For example, indicates that increasing the prudent fraction of the recruitment rate by 100% will cause the effective reproduction number to decrease by 17.26%. This means that the problem of substance abuse can be abated in the community if there are more prudent individuals or stayers who abstain from the use of psychoactive substance. This result is corroborated in Figure 3, where effects of increasing other parameters are also displayed with respect to the effective reproduction number. As shown in Figure 3a, as the effective substance abuse influence rate increases through the interval 0.01 ≤ β ≤ 0.09, the reproduction number increases through . This shows that the problem of substance abuse can escalate in the population if the influences of light and heavy drug users on the susceptible population and individuals under rehabilitation are not prevented.

Table 4. Sensitivity indices of parameters of the substance abuse model (7).
Parameter Value Sensitivity indices
b 0.1472 −0.1726
β 0.0183 +1.0000
ρ 1.5 +0.0353
ω 0.0006 +0.0328
θ 0.5606629 −0.0001
α 0.00750351 −0.0007
σ 0.009001 −0.0104
γ 0.0011 −0.0529
τ 0.0000953025 −0.0045
ε 0.002649 −0.0030
μ 0.01887 −0.9285
δ 0.0002 −0.0002
Details are in the caption following the image
Contour plots showing how effective reproduction number of the substance abuse model (7) is affected by (a) β and b and (b) ρ, and τ.
Details are in the caption following the image
Contour plots showing how effective reproduction number of the substance abuse model (7) is affected by (a) β and b and (b) ρ, and τ.

Similarly, in Figure 3b, increase in the modification parameter, ρ, for higher influence of heavy drug users will cause a rise in the value of the reproduction number , while it can also be seen that decreases with increase in the value of rehabilitation rate, τ.

4.2. Simulations and Discussion

Here, further simulations of the substance abuse model (7) are done to support the theoretical global stability results earlier obtained in Theorem 5 and Theorem 6. Using the same values of parameters as given in Table 3 in the absence of the immigrant heavy drug users (a = 0), it can be observed in Figure 4a and Figure 4b, respectively, that the trajectories of light drug users and heavy drug users converge asymptotically to the substance abuse–free equilibrium point, regardless of the initial conditions of the state variables. This establishes that the problem of substance abuse in the population can be curtailed whenever the effective reproduction number in the absence of immigrant heavy drug users, corroborating the global asymptotic stability result for the drug abuse–free equilibrium point in Theorem 5. Similarly, using the values given in Table 3, except that β = 0.05, so that , the solutions of the system converge to the substance abuse–present equilibrium point irrespective of the initial conditions of the light and heavy drug users in the population, as shown in Figure 4c and Figure 4d, respectively, corroborating the global asymptotic stability result for the drug abuse–present equilibrium point in Theorem 5.

Details are in the caption following the image
Global asymptotic convergence of trajectories of light and heavy drug users at different values of initial data. Parameter values in Table 3, except that a = 0, are used for convergence to the substance abuse-free steady state in (a) and (b), so that . While parameter values in Table 3, except that β = 0.05, are used for convergence to the substance abuse–present steady state in (c) and (d), so that .
Details are in the caption following the image
Global asymptotic convergence of trajectories of light and heavy drug users at different values of initial data. Parameter values in Table 3, except that a = 0, are used for convergence to the substance abuse-free steady state in (a) and (b), so that . While parameter values in Table 3, except that β = 0.05, are used for convergence to the substance abuse–present steady state in (c) and (d), so that .
Details are in the caption following the image
Global asymptotic convergence of trajectories of light and heavy drug users at different values of initial data. Parameter values in Table 3, except that a = 0, are used for convergence to the substance abuse-free steady state in (a) and (b), so that . While parameter values in Table 3, except that β = 0.05, are used for convergence to the substance abuse–present steady state in (c) and (d), so that .
Details are in the caption following the image
Global asymptotic convergence of trajectories of light and heavy drug users at different values of initial data. Parameter values in Table 3, except that a = 0, are used for convergence to the substance abuse-free steady state in (a) and (b), so that . While parameter values in Table 3, except that β = 0.05, are used for convergence to the substance abuse–present steady state in (c) and (d), so that .

In another sense, the impact of the prudent fraction, b, of the recruitment rate is examined on the dynamics of individuals in the population, as indicated in Figure 5. It is observed that the sizes of light drug users, heavy drug users, mentally ill class, and individuals under rehabilitation reduce with time as the prudent fraction increases from 1% to 50%. This result stresses the need for increased presence of prudent individuals in the community in order to minimize the menace of substance abuse and ultimately bringing the population into a substance abuse–free state. Figure 6 shows how the system behaves in the presence of immigrant drug users. It is shown that the sizes of susceptible individuals reduces with time in the population, as the fraction for immigrant drug users rises from 1% to 50%. This increase in the value of immigrant drug users results into the increase in the numbers of heavy drug users, mentally ill class, and individuals under rehabilitation in the population. This result suggests that thorough scrutiny of immigrants could be necessary in order to stem down the spread of drug abuse in the population.

Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of prudent fraction of the recruitment rate on the trajectories of (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill class, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of prudent fraction of the recruitment rate on the trajectories of (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill class, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of prudent fraction of the recruitment rate on the trajectories of (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill class, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of prudent fraction of the recruitment rate on the trajectories of (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill class, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of immigrant heavy drug users fraction of the recruitment rate on the trajectories of the (a): susceptible class, (b): heavy drug users, (c): mentally ill population, and (d): rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of immigrant heavy drug users fraction of the recruitment rate on the trajectories of the (a): susceptible class, (b): heavy drug users, (c): mentally ill population, and (d): rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of immigrant heavy drug users fraction of the recruitment rate on the trajectories of the (a): susceptible class, (b): heavy drug users, (c): mentally ill population, and (d): rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of immigrant heavy drug users fraction of the recruitment rate on the trajectories of the (a): susceptible class, (b): heavy drug users, (c): mentally ill population, and (d): rehabilitation class.

In Figure 7, it can be seen that increase in the reactivation rate of substance abuse influence, denoted by βr, from 1% to 90% slightly increases the populations of light and heavy drug users, as well as mentally ill population. This in turn decreases the sizes of individuals under rehabilitation. As the rate of rehabilitating heavy drug users increases from 1% to 50% in Figure 8, the populations of light drug users, heavy drug users, and mentally ill individuals decrease in sizes, while there is an increase in the number of individuals under rehabilitation. This result underscores the importance of rehabilitation in the fight against the negative influence of psychoactive substance abuse in the population.

Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of substance abuse reactivation rate on the trajectories of the (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill population, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of substance abuse reactivation rate on the trajectories of the (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill population, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of substance abuse reactivation rate on the trajectories of the (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill population, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of substance abuse reactivation rate on the trajectories of the (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill population, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of rehabilitation rate on the trajectories of (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill population, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of rehabilitation rate on the trajectories of (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill population, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of rehabilitation rate on the trajectories of (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill population, and (d) rehabilitation class.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of rehabilitation rate on the trajectories of (a) light drug users, (b) heavy drug users, (c) mentally ill population, and (d) rehabilitation class.

5. Conclusion

In an attempt to stem down the rising menace of substance abuse and its associated harmful consequences in the community, a mathematical model fitted to the real data of substance-induced mental cases under rehabilitation has been proposed in this study. The model describes how substance abuse affects total human population subdivided into six compartments, including susceptible class, light and heavy psychoactive substance users, mentally ill population, rehabilitation patients, and prudent class. Theoretically, the model is shown to be well-posed following the existence of positive, bounded, and unique solution through Lipschitz continuity approach. An important threshold quantity called the effective reproduction number, which quantifies the average population of secondary substance abuse cases influenced by a single light or heavy drug user during his influence period in a population where some individuals are susceptible and prudent, is calculated based on fitted parameter values obtained from data of drug-induced cases in a neuropsychiatric rehabilitation facility in Lagos, Nigeria. Further findings of this work are enumerated hereunder:
  • i.

    The model has substance abuse–free and substance abuse–present steady state solutions that coexist at the effective reproduction number less than unity, thereby making the control of drug abuse problem difficult.

  • ii.

    The coexistence of the aforesaid two steady states is caused by the unhindered influx of immigrants who are heavy drug users in the population.

  • iii.

    In the absence of immigrant heavy drug users, when the effective reproduction number is below one, the model is shown to have a globally asymptotically stable substance abuse–free steady state.

  • iv.

    A globally asymptotically stable substance abuse–present equilibrium point exists when the effective reproduction number is greater than unity.

  • v.

    The increased presence of prudent fraction of the recruitment of human population reduces the sizes of light drug users, heavy drug users, and substance abuse–induced mental cases in the community.

  • vi.

    The model’s most sensitive parameter with respect to the effective reproduction number is the influence rate of the substance abuse from both light and heavy drug users.

Overall, this study contributes to our understanding of the population dynamics of substance abuse in the presence of immigrant drug abusers and prudent individuals. Building on the aforementioned findings, future studies might investigate, via optimal control modelling approach, the optimum interventions for hampering the influence of drug users on the susceptible population and for checking the immigration of drug users with a view to further nipping the problem of drug abuse in the bud.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

S.O. conceptualized the problem; S.O., J.A.A., and S.F.A. did the formal analysis; J.A.A. and S.F.A. wrote the original draft; F.M.C., R.C.O., R.S.L., and K.O.O. investigated and validated results. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article, as obtained from Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.