Volume 2025, Issue 1 5556176
Case Report
Open Access

A Case of an Oral Elastofibromatous Lesion: A Clinicopathological Analysis With a Literature Review

Sawako Ono

Corresponding Author

Sawako Ono

Department of Pathology and Oncology , Graduate School of Medicine , Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences , Okayama University , Okayama , Japan , okayama-u.ac.jp

Search for more papers by this author
Masanori Masui

Masanori Masui

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital , Takamatsu , Kagawa , Japan , chp-kagawa.jp

Search for more papers by this author
Kyoichi Obata

Kyoichi Obata

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , Graduate School of Medicine , Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences , Okayama University , Okayama , Japan , okayama-u.ac.jp

Search for more papers by this author
Tomoya Nakamura

Tomoya Nakamura

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital , Takamatsu , Kagawa , Japan , chp-kagawa.jp

Search for more papers by this author
Yoshihiko Furuki

Yoshihiko Furuki

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital , Takamatsu , Kagawa , Japan , chp-kagawa.jp

Search for more papers by this author
Satoko Nakamura

Satoko Nakamura

Department of Pathology , Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital , Takamatsu , Kagawa , Japan , chp-kagawa.jp

Search for more papers by this author
Hidetaka Yamamoto

Hidetaka Yamamoto

Department of Pathology and Oncology , Graduate School of Medicine , Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences , Okayama University , Okayama , Japan , okayama-u.ac.jp

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 January 2025
Academic Editor: Samir Nammour

Abstract

Elastofibromatous changes of the oral mucosa, such as an elastofibroma (EF) or an elastofibromatous lesion (EFL), are not well recognized, and the second such case in Japan is reported. A 72-year-old man wearing a complete maxillary denture presented with a small nodule on the hard palate. Histopathological examination showed abundant fibrous tissue with numerous elastic fibers on Elastica van Gieson (EvG) staining. The diagnosis of an oral EFL was made. In the review of oral EF and EFL, no cases with recurrence were identified, but such lesions may resemble neoplastic lesions macroscopically. Accurate diagnosis using EvG stain is needed to recognize oral EFs and EFLs.

1. Introduction

An elastofibroma (EF) is a benign, ill-defined proliferation of fibroelastic tissue with abnormal elastic fibers, and an elastofibromatous lesion (EFL) is reported to be a precursor of EF [1, 2]. EFs and EFLs have been reported in regions other than the lower scapula and thoracic wall, including the neck, mediastinum, gastrointestinal tract, and multiple sites in subcutaneous tissue [310]. However, EFs and EFLs of the oral mucosa are not well recognized. A rare case of an oral EFL on the hard palate is reported along with a literature review to further characterize the clinicopathological features of oral EFs and EFLs.

2. Case Presentation

A 72-year-old man with no history of cancer and no relevant family history was found to have a mass on the hard palate during a medical examination. On his visit to our hospital, an approximately 5 mm submucosal mass was palpated on the left side of the hard palate, and the overlying epithelium of the mass appeared healthy on intraoral examination (Figure 1). A complete denture was used in the maxilla. Computed tomography (CT) showed no maxillary destruction. Clinically, the patient was diagnosed as having fibrous hyperplasia, and the lesion of the hard palate was resected. The surgically removed lesion measured 4 × 2 mm2. The gross appearance of the cut surface of the excised lesion showed a white elevated nodule. Histopathological examination showed the proliferation of pale fibrous tissue within the submucosa and dense eosinophilic fibrous tissue at the base (Figure 2). Elastica van Gieson (EvG) staining showed a high density of elastic fibers covered by mucosal epithelium, with few collagen fibers in the submucosa. Alcian Blue staining showed no mucin retention. There was no evidence of malignancy. These findings suggested the diagnosis of an oral EFL. Postoperatively, no additional therapy was given to the patient. Three months after the surgery, no recurrence was observed.

Details are in the caption following the image
Clinical findings. A solitary raised lesion with a smooth surface is visible on the hard palate.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a–d) Hematoxylin–eosin (HE) stain. Bars: (a) 500 and (b–d) 100 μm. (a) Histological examination shows a raised nodular growth covered by stratified squamous epithelium. (b) Proliferation of pale eosinophilic fibers is observed. (c) Elastica van Gieson stain shows dense and prominent elastic fibers, (d) but Masson stain shows sparse collagen fibers.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a–d) Hematoxylin–eosin (HE) stain. Bars: (a) 500 and (b–d) 100 μm. (a) Histological examination shows a raised nodular growth covered by stratified squamous epithelium. (b) Proliferation of pale eosinophilic fibers is observed. (c) Elastica van Gieson stain shows dense and prominent elastic fibers, (d) but Masson stain shows sparse collagen fibers.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a–d) Hematoxylin–eosin (HE) stain. Bars: (a) 500 and (b–d) 100 μm. (a) Histological examination shows a raised nodular growth covered by stratified squamous epithelium. (b) Proliferation of pale eosinophilic fibers is observed. (c) Elastica van Gieson stain shows dense and prominent elastic fibers, (d) but Masson stain shows sparse collagen fibers.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a–d) Hematoxylin–eosin (HE) stain. Bars: (a) 500 and (b–d) 100 μm. (a) Histological examination shows a raised nodular growth covered by stratified squamous epithelium. (b) Proliferation of pale eosinophilic fibers is observed. (c) Elastica van Gieson stain shows dense and prominent elastic fibers, (d) but Masson stain shows sparse collagen fibers.

3. Discussion

An EF is defined as an ill-defined proliferation of fibroelastic tissue, and an EFL has been reported to be an incipient elastofibromatous degenerative process that has not yet reached the appearance of a fully developed EF [1, 2]. An oral EF was first described by Potter, Summerlin, and Rodgers in 2004, after which several reports of oral EFLs followed [11]. To the best of our knowledge, there have been reports of elastic fiber disorders of the oral mucosa from the United States and Europe, but this is the second report from Asia in the English-language literature [1118]. A total of 15 cases were analyzed (Table 1), with eight classified as EFs and seven as EFLs. The mean age for the EF cases was 58.2 years, with a predominance of males. The palate was the most common site, and the average size was 4.6 mm. In contrast, the mean age for the EFL cases was 73.1 years, with slightly more females. The most common sites were the alveolar mucosa and palate, and the mean size was 7.4 mm. All 15 cases involved only a single lesion. No recurrence was reported in patients for between 3 and 120 months. Rodrigues Rodrigues et al. in Brazil reported an overview of 77 cases of oral EFs and EFLs [19]. They reported that the mean age was 39 years for EFs and 30 years for EFLs. The buccal mucosa was the most common area affected in both types, and the mean size was 9.9 mm for EFs and 7.8 mm for EFLs. Compared with the present study, they reported an extremely large number of cases, younger age of occurrence, and slightly larger size. Regional factors may be associated with the occurrence of oral EFLs and EFs.

Table 1. Summary of previous cases of oral elastofibromas and elastofibromatous lesions.
Author Country Diagnosis Age (years) Sex Location Macroscopic appearance Symptoms Size (mm) Treatment Outcome
Potter, Summerlin, and Rodgers [11] United States EF 56 F Floor of mouth Well-circumscribed, soft-tissue, submucosal mass No 4 S NR
Manchandu, Foote, and Alawi [12] United States EF 71 M Floor of mouth Nodular mass No 6 S NR
Tosios et al. [13] Greece EFL 76 F Floor of mouth Small, flat, white area NM NM NM NM
Greece EFL 98 F Alveolar mucosa An area of leukoplakia NM NM NM NM
Nonaka et al. [14] Brazil EFL 55 M Soft palate Whitish, smooth-surfaced plaque No 10 S NR
Darling et al. [15] Canada EF 33 M Plate Nonulcerated lesion No 2 S NR
Canada EF 43 M Plate Yellow growth No 3 S NR
Canada EF 50 M Floor of mouth Leukoplakia NM 7 S NR
Canada EF 76 F Lower lip NM NM 7 S NR
Canada EF 75 M Tongue White nodule NM 5 S NR
Daley and Darling [16] Canada EF 62 M Hard palate Exophytic, smooth-surfaced, pink nodule No 3 S NM
Silva et al. [17] Brazil EFL 63 F Buccal mucosa Localized, slightly elevated lesion No 10 S NM
Brazil EFL 76 M Inferior vestibular fornix A solitary white lesion No 10 S NM
Ogawa et al. [18] Japan EFL 72 F Alveolar mucosa White-colored, smooth-surfaced, firm papule No 3 S NR
Present case Japan EFL 72 M Hard palate Submucosal mass No 4 S NR
  • Abbreviations: EF: elastofibroma, EFL: elastofibromatous lesion, NM: not mentioned, NR: no recurrence, S: surgical excision.

The macroscopic findings of oral EFLs and EFs varied, including a submucosal mass, nodule, plaque, papule, slightly elevated lesion, or flat area. The color was white to yellow. The clinical diagnoses also varied, and most were non-neoplastic lesions, including fibromas, hyperkeratosis, aphthae, submucosal abscesses, lymphoid aggregates, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus, and minor salivary gland cysts [1118]. However, neoplastic lesions such as soft tissue neoplasms including lipoma, dysplasia, and cancer were also suspected in some cases, one of which showed acute onset of a nodule [1113, 18]. Therefore, it is difficult to suspect oral EFs and EFLs clinically, and preoperative biopsy is important to prevent overtreatment.

Histologically, the elastic fibers of EFs in soft tissue are thick or coarse, deeply eosinophilic, and fragmented into linearly arranged globular or serrated disc-like structures, simulating beads on a string [1]. In contrast, in oral EFLs, some cases showed spherical, fragmented, or globular elastic fibers, whereas in others, only aggregation and proliferation were observed [13, 14, 17, 18]. In the present case, only aggregation and proliferation of elastic fibers were observed, with no spherical or fragmented elastic fibers. Therefore, the present case was considered a degenerative process preceding EF and diagnosed as an oral EFL.

Clinically, fibrous hyperplasia was suspected in the present case. On histological examination alone, it is difficult to differentiate fibrous hyperplasia and oral EFs or EFLs. Rodrigues Rodrigues et al. reported 77 cases of oral EFs and EFLs reclassified from 95 cases primarily diagnosed as oral fibromas, and oral EFs and EFLs may be underestimated [19]. To identify oral EFs and EFLs, the pathologist should perform a histological evaluation using an EvG stain.

Oral EFs or EFLs occur in the superficial lamina propria and submucosa, and the most common suggested etiology is trauma. The oral mucosa has a layer of fibrocollagenous and elastic tissue in the lamina propria and submucosa, and their hyperproliferation and degeneration would be associated with oral EFs or EFLs. Elastin is reported to be the most abundant in the soft palate but the lowest in the hard palate [20]. However, since it occurs in areas other than the soft palate, it may be related not only to the amounts of elastic fibers in the mucosa but also to the degree of irritation applied to the mucosa.

EFs arise most often in the deep soft tissue between the lower scapula and the thoracic wall [1]. The cause is considered to be friction of the lower scapula against the thoracic wall due to repetitive minor trauma and manual labor [6]. However, EFs often show chromosomal instability, including gains of 6p25-q25 and Xq12-q22 and losses of 1p, 13q, 19p, and 22q [21, 22]. In addition, deletion of CASR (3q21), GSTP1 (11q13), and BRCA2 (13q12) and gains of APC (5q21) and PAH (12q23) were observed [22]. Whether the presence of this chromosomal instability, not usually observed in non-neoplastic tissues, suggests a possible neoplastic origin for EFs remains to be determined. EFs and EFLs in the oral mucosa have not been analyzed genetically, and future studies including genetic analyses are needed to clarify the possibility of a neoplastic origin.

4. Conclusion

Surgeons and pathologists need to understand that EFs and EFLs occur in the oral mucosa, and preoperative biopsy and EvG staining should be used for correct diagnosis and treatment.

Consent

The authors certify that they have obtained the appropriate patient consent form. On signing the form, the patient consented to his images and other clinical information being reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting this case report are available from the corresponding author or first author on reasonable request.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.