Radar Target Detection with K-Nearest Neighbor Manifold Filter on Riemannian Manifold
Dongao Zhou
Academy of Military Science , Beijing , 100089 , China , ams.ac.cn
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Weilong Yang
Academy of Military Science , Beijing , 100089 , China , ams.ac.cn
Search for more papers by this authorZhaopeng Liu
Academy of Military Science , Beijing , 100089 , China , ams.ac.cn
Search for more papers by this authorManhui Sun
Academy of Military Science , Beijing , 100089 , China , ams.ac.cn
Search for more papers by this authorDongao Zhou
Academy of Military Science , Beijing , 100089 , China , ams.ac.cn
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Weilong Yang
Academy of Military Science , Beijing , 100089 , China , ams.ac.cn
Search for more papers by this authorZhaopeng Liu
Academy of Military Science , Beijing , 100089 , China , ams.ac.cn
Search for more papers by this authorManhui Sun
Academy of Military Science , Beijing , 100089 , China , ams.ac.cn
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In this paper, we propose a K-nearest neighbor manifold filter on the Riemannian manifold and apply it to signal detection within clutter. In particular, the correlation and power of sample data in each cell are modeled as an Hermitian positive definite (HPD) matrix. A K-nearest neighbor filter that performs the weight average of the set of K-nearest neighbor HPD matrices of each HPD matrix is proposed to reduce the clutter power. Then, the clutter covariance matrix is estimated as the Riemannian mean of a set of secondary HPD matrices. Signal detection is considered as distinguishing the matrices of clutter and target signal on the Riemannian manifold. Moreover, to speed up the convergence of matrix equation of Riemannian mean, we exploit a strategy to choose the initial input matrix and step size of this equation. Numerical results show that the proposed detector achieves a detection performance improvement over the conventional detector as well as its state-of-the-art counterpart in nonhomogeneous clutter.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
References
- 1 Paulus A. S., Melvin W. L., and Williams D. B., Multichannel GMTI techniques to enhance integration of temporal signal energy for improved target detection, IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation. (2017) 11, no. 3, 395–403, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0082, 2-s2.0-85017410345.
- 2 Sohn K. J., Li H., and Himed B., Parametric GLRT for multichannel adaptive signal detection, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2007) 55, no. 11, 5351–5360, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2007.896068, 2-s2.0-36248937048.
- 3
Liu J.,
Massaro D.,
Orlando D., and
Farina A., Radar adaptive detection architectures for heterogeneous environments, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2020) 68, 4307–4319, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2020.3009836.
10.1109/TSP.2020.3009836 Google Scholar
- 4
Hall D. L., The role of acoustic ground sensors in multi-sensor surveillance systems, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2003, Big Sky, MT, USA, IEEE, 2167–2174, https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2003.1235141, 2-s2.0-84879348552.
10.1109/AERO.2003.1235141 Google Scholar
- 5
Liu J.,
Liu W.,
Chen X.,
Orlando D., and
Farina A., Performance analysis of the generalized likelihood ratio test in general phased array radar configuration, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2021) 69, 4544–4555, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2021.3097658.
10.1109/TSP.2021.3097658 Google Scholar
- 6 Richmond C. D., A note on non-Gaussian adaptive array detection and signal parameter estimation, IEEE Signal Processing Letters. (1996) 3, no. 8, 251–252, https://doi.org/10.1109/97.511810, 2-s2.0-0030211709.
- 7
Liu J.,
Sun S., and
Liu W., One-step persymmetric GLRT for subspace signals, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2019) 67, no. 14, 3639–3648, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2019.2918994, 2-s2.0-85067126100.
10.1109/TSP.2019.2918994 Google Scholar
- 8
Sun M.,
Liu W.,
Liu J., and
Hao C., Complex parameter rao, wald, gradient, and durbin tests for multichannel signal detection, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2022) 70, 117–131, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2021.3132485.
10.1109/TSP.2021.3132485 Google Scholar
- 9
Hua X.,
Ono Y.,
Peng L., and
Xu Y., Unsupervised learning discriminative MIG detectors in nonhomogeneous clutter, IEEE Transactions on Communications. (2022) 70, no. 6, 4107–4120, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2022.3170988.
10.1109/TCOMM.2022.3170988 Google Scholar
- 10
Liu W.,
Liu J.,
Liu T.,
Chen H., and
Wang Y.-L., Detector design and performance analysis for target detection in subspace interference, IEEE Signal Processing Letters. (2023) 30, 618–622, https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2023.3270080.
10.1109/LSP.2023.3270080 Google Scholar
- 11
Hua X.,
Peng L.,
Liu W.,
Cheng Y.,
Wang H.,
Sun H., and
Wang Z., LDA-MIG detectors for maritime targets in nonhomogeneous sea clutter, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. (2023) 61, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3250990.
10.1109/TGRS.2023.3283135 Google Scholar
- 12
Liu W.,
Liu J.,
Gao Y.,
Wang G., and
Wang Y.-L., Multichannel signal detection in interference and noise when signal mismatch happens, Signal Processing. (2020) 166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107268, 107268.
10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107268 Google Scholar
- 13 Wang Y., Xia W., He Z., Li H., and Petropulu A. P., Polarimetric detection in compound Gaussian clutter with kronecker structured covariance matrix, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2017) 65, no. 17, 4562–4576, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2017.2716912, 2-s2.0-85023205036.
- 14
Li J.,
Aubry A.,
De Maio A., and
Zhou J., An EL approach for similarity parameter selection in KA covariance matrix estimation, IEEE Signal Processing Letters. (2019) 26, no. 8, 1217–1221, https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2019.2925582, 2-s2.0-85069795997.
10.1109/LSP.2019.2925582 Google Scholar
- 15
Ghaderpour E. and
Ghaderpour S., Least-squares spectral and wavelet analyses of V455 andromedae time series: the life after the super-outburst, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. (2020) 132, no. 1017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/abaf04, 114504.
10.1088/1538-3873/abaf04 Google Scholar
- 16
Shukla V. and
Swami P. D., Sparse signal recovery through long short-term memory networks for compressive sensing-based speech enhancement, Electronics. (2023) 12, no. 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12143097, 3097.
10.3390/electronics12143097 Google Scholar
- 17
Soloveychik I.,
Trushin D., and
Wiesel A., Group symmetric robust covariance estimation, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2016) 64, no. 1, 244–257, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2015.2486739, 2-s2.0-85009373497.
10.1109/TSP.2015.2486739 Google Scholar
- 18
Shikhaliev A. P.,
Potter L. C., and
Chi Y., Low-rank structured covariance matrix estimation, IEEE Signal Processing Letters. (2019) 26, no. 5, 700–704, https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2019.2906405, 2-s2.0-85064107912.
10.1109/LSP.2019.2906405 Google Scholar
- 19 Du X., Aubry A., De Maio A., and Cui G., Toeplitz structured covariance matrix estimation for radar applications, IEEE Signal Processing Letters. (2020) 27, 595–599, https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2020.2984431.
- 20 Wang P., Li H., and Himed B., Knowledge-aided parametric tests for multichannel adaptive signal detection, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2011) 59, no. 12, 5970–5982, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2011.2168220, 2-s2.0-81455148135.
- 21
Lapuyade-Lahorgue J. and
Barbaresco F., Radar detection using siegel distance between autoregressive processes, application to HF and X-band radar, 2008 IEEE Radar Conference, 2008, Rome, Italy, IEEE, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2008.4721049, 2-s2.0-61849100999.
10.1109/RADAR.2008.4721049 Google Scholar
- 22
Hua X.,
Cheng Y.,
Wang H.,
Qin Y., and
Chen D., Geometric target detection based on total Bregman divergence, Digital Signal Processing. (2018) 75, 232–241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2018.01.008, 2-s2.0-85041414285.
10.1016/j.dsp.2018.01.008 Google Scholar
- 23
Liu Z. and
Barbaresco F., Doppler information geometry for wake turbulence monitoring, Matrix Information Geometry, 2013, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 277–290, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30232-9_11.
10.1007/978-3-642-30232-9_11 Google Scholar
- 24 Barbaresco F. and Meier U., Radar monitoring of a wake vortex: Electromagnetic reflection of wake turbulence in clear air, Comptes Rendus. Physique. (2010) 11, no. 1, 54–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2010.01.001, 2-s2.0-77949264893.
- 25
Ruiz M. and
Barbaresco F., Radar detection for non-stationary doppler signal in one burst based on information geometry distance between paths, 2015 16th International Radar Symposium (IRS), 2015, Dresden, Germany, IEEE, 422–427, https://doi.org/10.1109/IRS.2015.7226283, 2-s2.0-84950106232.
10.1109/IRS.2015.7226283 Google Scholar
- 26 Arnaudon M., Barbaresco F., and Yang L., Riemannian medians and means with applications to radar signal processing, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. (2013) 7, no. 4, 595–604, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2013.2261798, 2-s2.0-84880888564.
- 27 Hua X., Cheng Y., Wang H., Qin Y., Li Y., and Zhang W., Matrix CFAR detectors based on symmetrized Kullback–Leibler and total Kullback–Leibler divergences, Digital Signal Processing. (2017) 69, 106–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2017.06.019, 2-s2.0-85021668199.
- 28 Hua X., Fan H., Cheng Y., Wang H., and Qin Y., Information geometry for radar target detection with total Jensen–Bregman divergence, Entropy. (2018) 20, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.3390/e20040256, 2-s2.0-85045829978, 256.
- 29 Pennec X., Fillard P., and Ayache N., A Riemannian framework for tensor computing, International Journal of Computer Vision. (2006) 66, no. 1, 41–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-005-3222-z, 2-s2.0-29344452228.
- 30 Moakher M. and Zéraï M., The Riemannian geometry of the space of positive-definite matrices and its application to the regularization of positive-definite matrix-valued data, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision. (2011) 40, no. 2, 171–187, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-010-0255-x, 2-s2.0-79953208930.
- 31 Závada P., Operator of fractional derivative in the complex plane, Communications in Mathematical Physics. (1998) 192, no. 2, 261–285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050299, 2-s2.0-0040041603.
- 32 Guariglia E., Fractional calculus, zeta functions and Shannon entropy, Open Mathematics. (2021) 19, no. 1, 87–100, https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2021-0010.
- 33
Guariglia E. and
Silvestrov S., Fractional-wavelet analysis of positive definite distributions and wavelets on DC, Engineering Mathematics II, 2016, 179, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 337–353, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42105-6_16, 2-s2.0-85012884806.
10.1007/978-3-319-42105-6_16 Google Scholar
- 34 Guariglia E., Riemann zeta fractional derivative—functional equation and link with primes, Advances in Difference Equations. (2019) 2019, no. 1, 261–285, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2202-5, 2-s2.0-85068802227.
- 35 Berry M. V., Lewis Z. V., and Nye J. F., On the weierstrass-mandelbrot fractal function, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A. (1980) 370, no. 1743, 459–484, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1980.0044.
- 36 Zheng X., Tang Y. Y., and Zhou J., A framework of adaptive multiscale wavelet decomposition for signals on undirected graphs, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2019) 67, no. 7, 1696–1711, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2019.2896246, 2-s2.0-85061066738.
- 37 Hua X., Cheng Y., Wang H., Qin Y., and Li Y., Geometric means and medians with applications to target detection, IET Signal Processing. (2017) 11, no. 6, 711–720, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-spr.2016.0547, 2-s2.0-85026757258.
- 38 Hua X., Ono Y., Peng L., Cheng Y., and Wang H., Target detection within nonhomogeneous clutter via total Bregman divergence-based matrix information geometry detectors, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. (2021) 69, 4326–4340, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2021.3095725.
- 39
Amari S.-I. and
Han T. S., Statistical inference under multiterminal rate restrictions: a differential geometric approach, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. (1989) 35, no. 2, 217–227, https://doi.org/10.1109/18.32118, 2-s2.0-0024629649.
10.1109/18.32118 Google Scholar
- 40
Hua X.,
Lan Q.,
Wang Y.,
Ma S., and
Tian J., An improved matrix information geometric detector with parameter selection, 2020 IEEE 6th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 2020, Chengdu, China, IEEE, 2313–2317, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC51575.2020.9345105.
10.1109/ICCC51575.2020.9345105 Google Scholar
- 41 Bhattacharya R. and Patrangenaru V., Large sample theory of intrinsic and extrinsic sample means on manifolds, The Annals of Statistics. (2003) 31, no. 1, 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1046294456, 2-s2.0-21144443869.
- 42 Pennec X., Intrinsic statistics on Riemannian manifolds: basic tools for geometric measurements, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision. (2006) 25, no. 1, 127–154, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-006-6228-4, 2-s2.0-33749642835.
- 43 Moakher M., On the averaging of symmetric positive-definite tensors, Journal of Elasticity. (2006) 82, no. 3, 273–296, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-005-9035-z, 2-s2.0-33645812768.
- 44 Bini D. A. and Iannazzo B., Computing the karcher mean of symmetric positive definite matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications. (2013) 438, no. 4, 1700–1710, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2011.08.052, 2-s2.0-84872106502.
- 45 Bini D. A. and Iannazzo B., A note on computing matrix geometric means, Advances in Computational Mathematics. (2011) 35, no. 2–4, 175–192, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-010-9165-0, 2-s2.0-80051900886.
- 46
Hua X. and
Peng L., MIG median detectors with manifold filter, Signal Processing. (2021) 188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108176, 108176.
10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108176 Google Scholar
- 47 Kelly E. J., An adaptive detection algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems. (1986) AES-22, no. 2, 115–127, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1986.310745, 2-s2.0-0022686270.