Development Process of a Holistic Assessment Questionnaire to Measure and Monitor Cancer-Related Fatigue
Corresponding Author
Kim A. E. Wijlens
Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Search for more papers by this authorAnnemieke Witteveen
Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Search for more papers by this authorLian Beenhakker
Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Search for more papers by this authorSabine Siesling
Department of Health Technology and Services Research , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Department of Research and Development , Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) , Utrecht , Netherlands , iknl.nl
Search for more papers by this authorMiriam M. R. Vollenbroek-Hutten
Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Board of Directors , Medisch Spectrum Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , mst.nl
Search for more papers by this authorChristina Bode
Department of Psychology, Health and Technology , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kim A. E. Wijlens
Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Search for more papers by this authorAnnemieke Witteveen
Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Search for more papers by this authorLian Beenhakker
Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Search for more papers by this authorSabine Siesling
Department of Health Technology and Services Research , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Department of Research and Development , Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) , Utrecht , Netherlands , iknl.nl
Search for more papers by this authorMiriam M. R. Vollenbroek-Hutten
Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems , Technical Medical Centre , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Board of Directors , Medisch Spectrum Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , mst.nl
Search for more papers by this authorChristina Bode
Department of Psychology, Health and Technology , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands , utwente.nl
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Purpose: To understand the consequences of diseases and treatment such as cancer and thus the needs of patients for surveillance and care and to improve quality of life, patients should be assessed using a holistic approach. However, instruments to create such a holistic view do not exist and the development presents unique challenges. Therefore, this study presents a method for the development of a holistic assessment questionnaire using cancer-related fatigue (CRF) as a case.
Method: We started with (1) the definition of our construct of interest (CRF) on the theme level followed by (2) item selection, an iterative process of searching for validated questionnaires that together cover the full holistic construct. The construct definition on theme level (1) was too broad and was, therefore, redefined on the element level (construct > theme > element) based on interviews with relevant stakeholders. Hereafter, item selection (2) was performed on the element level based on a priority list, psychometric properties (e.g., discriminative parameter value) and consultation of experts and future users. Lastly, (3) items were reformulated.
Results: Initial CRF construct definition (1) resulted in 110 relevant validated questionnaires with over three thousand items, requiring a construct redefinition on element level. Seventy-two items from 21 validated questionnaires were included (2) in the preliminary holistic assessment questionnaire. For item reformulation (3), easy language was used to better suit the target population.
Conclusion: Tailoring care to the individual requires a holistic view. This article presents a novel method to develop a holistic assessment questionnaire, including an example for CRF, with several recommendations for cancer-specific instrument development. Although the development process of a holistic assessment questionnaire is time-consuming, more late and long-term effects of cancer are multidimensional and could benefit from a holistic approach in their assessment to enable personalised care, thereby improving quality of life and reducing societal impact.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The generated datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request in Dutch. During the research phase, the questionnaire is not yet publicly available.
References
- 1 Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation IKNL, Cancer Care in the Picture: on Living After Cancer (Kankerzorg in Beeld: Over Leven Met En Na Kanker), 2019.
- 2 Nekhlyudov L., Mollica M. A., Jacobsen P. B., Mayer D. K., Shulman L. N., and Geiger A. M., Developing a Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework: Implications for Clinical Care, Research, and Policy, JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. (2019) 111, 1120–1130, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz089.
- 3 Sheikh-Wu S., Anglade D., and Downs C., A Cancer Survivorship Model for Holistic Cancer Care and Research, Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal. (2023) 33, 4–16, https://doi.org/10.5737/236880763314.
- 4 Penttinen H. M., Saarto T., Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P. et al., Quality of Life and Physical Performance and Activity of Breast Cancer Patients After Adjuvant Treatments, Psycho-Oncology. (2011) 20, 1211–1220, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1837, 2-s2.0-80054794624.
- 5 Alfano C. M., Kent E. E., Padgett L. S., Grimes M., and de Moor J. S., Making Cancer Rehabilitation Services Work for Cancer Patients: Recommendations for Research and Practice to Improve Employment Outcomes, PM&R. (2017) 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.019, 2-s2.0-85029918774.
- 6 Mehnert A., Employment and Work-Related Issues in Cancer Survivors, Critical Reviews in Oncology. (2011) 77, 109–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.01.004, 2-s2.0-78751606163.
- 7
Islam T.,
Dahlui M.,
Majid H. A.,
Nahar A. M.,
Taib N. A. M., and
Su T. T., Factors Associated With Return to Work of Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review, BMC Public Health. (2014) 14, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S8, 2-s2.0-84964315190.
10.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S8 Google Scholar
- 8 Sun Y., Shigaki C. L., and Armer J. M., Return to Work Among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Literature Review, Supportive Care in Cancer. (2017) 25, 709–718, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3446-1, 2-s2.0-84996548995.
- 9 Rogers K., McCabe C., and Dowling S., What Are the Holistic Experiences of Adults Living Long-Term With the Consequences of Cancer and its Treatment? A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, European Journal of Oncology Nursing. (2021) 50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101864.
- 10 Biddell C. B., Spees L. P., Mayer D. K. et al., Developing Personalized Survivorship Care Pathways in the United States: Existing Resources and Remaining Challenges, Cancer. (2021) 127, 997–1004, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33355.
- 11 Alfano C. M., Leach C. R., Smith T. G. et al., Equitably Improving Outcomes for Cancer Survivors and Supporting Caregivers: A Blueprint for Care Delivery, Research, Education, and Policy, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. (2019) 69, 35–49, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21548, 2-s2.0-85055627207.
- 12 Engel G. L., The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine, Science. (1977) 196, 129–136, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460, 2-s2.0-0017576627.
- 13
Zamanzadeh V.,
Jasemi M.,
Valizadeh L.,
Keogh B., and
Taleghani F., Effective Factors in Providing Holistic Care: A Qualitative Study, Indian Journal of Palliative Care. (2015) 21, https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.156506, 2-s2.0-84929332510.
10.4103/0973-1075.156506 Google Scholar
- 14 Dekkers T. and Hertroijs D. F. L., Tailored Healthcare: Two Perspectives on the Development and Use of Patient Profiles, Advances in Therapy. (2018) 35, 1453–1459, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0765-2, 2-s2.0-85052579054.
- 15 Wijlens K. A. E., Beenhakker L., Witteveen A. et al., A Holistic Profile for Cancer-Related Fatigue for Women With Breast Cancer—A Qualitative Study, Psychology and Health. (2023) 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2289457.
- 16 Gielissen M. F. M., Verhagen S., Witjes F., and Bleijenberg G., Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Severely Fatigued Disease-free Cancer Patients Compared with Patients Waiting for Cognitive Behavior Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal of Clinical Oncology. (2006) 24, 4882–4887, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8270, 2-s2.0-33750613089.
- 17 Boateng G. O., Neilands T. B., Frongillo E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez H. R., and Young S. L., Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer, Frontiers in Public Health. (2018) 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.
- 18 Rattray J. and Jones M. C., Essential Elements of Questionnaire Design and Development, Journal of Clinical Nursing. (2007) 16, 234–243, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x, 2-s2.0-33846123640.
- 19
Song Y.,
Son Y.-J., and
Oh D., Methodological Issues in Questionnaire Design, Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. (2015) 45, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.323, 2-s2.0-84937853720.
10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.323 Google Scholar
- 20 Swan K., Speyer R., Scharitzer M. et al., Measuring what Matters in Healthcare: A Practical Guide to Psychometric Principles and Instrument Development, Frontiers in Psychology. (2023) 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1225850.
- 21 Kishore K., Jaswal V., Kulkarni V., and De D., Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire, Indian Dermatology Online Journal. (2021) 12, https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20.
- 22
Streiner D. L.,
Norman G. R., and
Cairney J., Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 2014, 5th edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001 Google Scholar
- 23 (2013) PROMIS® Instrument Development and Validation Scientific Standards, Version 2.0, (revised May 2013), Accessed January, 6th, 2023.
- 24
Tsang S.,
Royse C., and
Terkawi A., Guidelines for Developing, Translating, and Validating a Questionnaire in Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. (2017) 11, https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17, 2-s2.0-85019773837.
10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17 Google Scholar
- 25 Harrison D. A. and McLaughlin M. E., Cognitive Processes in Self-Report Responses: Tests of Item Context Effects in Work Attitude Measures, Journal of Applied Psychology. (1993) 78, 129–140, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.129, 2-s2.0-0027546067.
- 26 Pharos, Questionnaire for Everyone, The Foundation For Good Care (Vragenlijst Voor Iedereen, de Basis Voor Goede Zorg), 2021.
- 27 Marsden J., Eastwood B., Ali R. et al., Development of the Addiction Dimensions for Assessment and Personalised Treatment (ADAPT), Drug and Alcohol Dependence. (2014) 139, 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.018, 2-s2.0-84899946588.
- 28
Sondhi A.,
Pointon L.,
Kawalek A.,
Leidi A., and
Best D., Factors Associated with Concurrent Illicit Use of Opiates and Crack/cocaine Among Opiate-Users in Treatment: Implications for Treatment Services in England, Addiction Research and Theory. (2020) 28, 298–304, https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2019.1647176.
10.1080/16066359.2019.1647176 Google Scholar
- 29 Schmit M. K., Oller M. L., Tapia-Fuselier J. L., and Schmit E. L., A Holistic Client Functioning Profile Comparison of People with Serious Mental Illness, Journal of Counseling and Development. (2020) 98, 3–16, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12295.
- 30 Richardson A., Medina J., Richardson A., Sitzia J., and Brown V., Patients’ Needs Assessment Tools in Cancer Care: Principles & Practice, Support Care Cancer. (2005) 15, no. 10.
- 31 Li L., Li S., Wang Y. et al., Coping Profiles Differentiate Psychological Adjustment in Chinese Women Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer, Integrative Cancer Therapies. (2017) 16, 196–204, https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735416646854, 2-s2.0-85019616864.
- 32 Cheng C.-T., Ho S. M. Y., Liu W.-K. et al., Cancer-coping Profile Predicts Long-Term Psychological Functions and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors, Supportive Care in Cancer. (2019) 27, 933–941, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4382-z, 2-s2.0-85051276992.
- 33 Rothrock N. E., Kaiser K. A., and Cella D., Developing a Valid Patient-Reported Outcome Measure, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. (2011) 90, 737–742, https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2011.195, 2-s2.0-80054993653.
- 34 Abrahams H. J. G., Gielissen M. F. M., Verhagen C. A. H. H. V. M., and Knoop H., The Relationship of Fatigue in Breast Cancer Survivors with Quality of Life and Factors to Address in Psychological Interventions: A Systematic Review, Clinical Psychology Review. (2018) 63, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.004, 2-s2.0-85047607888.
- 35 de Ligt K. M., Heins M., Verloop J. et al., The Impact of Health Symptoms on Health-Related Quality of Life in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivors, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. (2019) 178, 703–711, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05433-3, 2-s2.0-85073954246.
- 36 Joly F., Lange M., Dos Santos M., Vaz-Luis I., and Di Meglio A., Long-Term Fatigue and Cognitive Disorders in Breast Cancer Survivors, Cancers. (2019) 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121896.
- 37 Buffart L. M., Galvão D. A., Brug J., Chinapaw M. J. M., and Newton R. U., Evidence-based Physical Activity Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Current Guidelines, Knowledge Gaps and Future Research Directions, Cancer Treatment Reviews. (2014) 40, 327–340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.06.007, 2-s2.0-84888287148.
- 38 Biering K., Frydenberg M., Pappot H., and Hjollund N. H., The Long-Term Course of Fatigue Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. (2020) 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00187-9.
- 39 Goedendorp M. M., Gielissen M. F. M., Verhagen C. A. H. H. V. M., and Bleijenberg G., Development of Fatigue in Cancer Survivors: A Prospective Follow-Up Study from Diagnosis into the Year after Treatment, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. (2013) 45, 213–222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.009, 2-s2.0-84873408094.
- 40 Netemeyer R. G., Bearden W. O., and Subhash S., Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications, 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
- 41 Gielissen M. F. M., Verhagen S., Witjes F., and Bleijenberg G., Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Severely Fatigued Disease-free Cancer Patients Compared with Patients Waiting for Cognitive Behavior Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal of Clinical Oncology. (2006) 24, 4882–4887, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8270, 2-s2.0-33750613089.
- 42 Servaes P., Verhagen C., and Bleijenberg G., Fatigue in Cancer Patients during and after Treatment, European Journal of Cancer: Part A. (2002) 38, 27–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00332-X, 2-s2.0-0036137172.
- 43 Prue G., Rankin J., Allen J., Gracey J., and Cramp F., Cancer-related Fatigue: A Critical Appraisal, European Journal of Cancer: Part A. (2006) 42, 846–863, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.026, 2-s2.0-33646165014.
- 44 Servaes P., Verhagen S., and Bleijenberg G., Determinants of Chronic Fatigue in Disease-Free Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study, Annals of Oncology. (2002) 13, 589–598, https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdf082, 2-s2.0-0036237731.
- 45 Broeckel J. A., Jacobsen P. B., Horton J., Balducci L., and Lyman G. H., Characteristics and Correlates of Fatigue after Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology. (1998) 16, 1689–1696, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1998.16.5.1689, 2-s2.0-0031803502.
- 46
Mitchell S. A., Cancer-related Fatigue: State of the Science, Pharmacy Management R. (2010) 2, 364–383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.03.024, 2-s2.0-77952858956.
10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.03.024 Google Scholar
- 47 Stull D. E., Leidy N. K., Parasuraman B., and Chassany O., Optimal Recall Periods for Patient-Reported Outcomes: Challenges and Potential Solutions, Current Medical Research and Opinion. (2009) 25, 929–942, https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990902774765, 2-s2.0-67649342633.
- 48
Wolvers M., On Chronic Cancer-Related Fatigue and Physical Behavior, 2017, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
10.3990/1.9789036542999 Google Scholar
- 49 Bruggeman-Everts F. Z., Evaluation of Two Different Web-Based Interventions for Chronic Cancer—Related Fatigue, Online Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Feedback and Ambulant Activity Feedback. (2018) .
- 50 Abrahams H. J. G., Gielissen M. F. M., Verhagen C. A. H. H. V. M., and Knoop H., The Relationship of Fatigue in Breast Cancer Survivors with Quality of Life and Factors to Address in Psychological Interventions: A Systematic Review, Clinical Psychology Review. (2018) 63, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.004, 2-s2.0-85047607888.
- 51 Crist J. V. and Grunfeld E. A., Factors Reported to Influence Fear of Recurrence in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review, Psycho-Oncology. (2013) 22, 978–986, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3114, 2-s2.0-84877584284.
- 52 Jankowski C., Carpenter K. M., Aranha O., Ballinger T., Banerjee C., and Berger A. M., NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2023 Cancer-Related Fatigue NCCN Guidelines Panel Disclosures Continue, 2023.
- 53 Person H., Guillemin F., Conroy T., Velten M., and Rotonda C., Factors of the Evolution of Fatigue Dimensions in Patients With Breast Cancer During the 2 Years After Surgery, International Journal of Cancer. (2020) 146, 1827–1835, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32527, 2-s2.0-85069930675.
- 54 Schmidt M. E., Wiskemann J., Schneeweiss A., Potthoff K., Ulrich C. M., and Steindorf K., Determinants of Physical, Affective, and Cognitive Fatigue During Breast Cancer Therapy and 12 Months Follow-Up, International Journal of Cancer. (2018) 142, 1148–1157, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31138, 2-s2.0-85040723669.
- 55 Kuhnt S., Friedrich M., Schulte T., Esser P., and Hinz A., Predictors of Fatigue in Cancer Patients: A Longitudinal Study, Supportive Care in Cancer. (2019) 27, 3463–3471, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-4660-4, 2-s2.0-85060677037.
- 56 Specimen-FA12-English, 2021.
- 57 Kos D., Kerckhofs E., Nagels G. et al., Assessing Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: Dutch Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Acta Neurologica Belgica. (2003) 103, 185–191.
- 58 PROMIS Bank v1.0-Fatigue, 2021.
- 59 BRAF-MDQ, 2021.
- 60 EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3), 2021.
- 61 Dickinson K. A., Kelly D. L., Lai J.-S., and Saligan L. N., Development of the PROMIS-Based Research Assessment and Clinical Tool-Fatigue (ReACT-F), Supportive Care in Cancer. (2019) 27, 3375–3383, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4614-2, 2-s2.0-85059881317.
- 62 International Consensus Group, International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (Internationale Lichamelijke Activiteiten Vragenlijst Korte Versie), 1998.
- 63 Ryan E. G., Vitoratou S., Goldsmith K. A., and Chalder T., Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of a Long and Shortened Version of the Cognitive and Behavioural Responses Questionnaire, Psychosomatic Medicine. (2018) 80, 230–237, https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000536, 2-s2.0-85041699605.
- 64
Godin G., Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14288/hfjc.v4i1.82.
10.14288/hfjc.v4i1.82 Google Scholar
- 65
Shahid A.,
Wilkinson K.,
Marcu S., and
Shapiro C. M., General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), STOP, THAT and One Hundred Other Sleep Scales, 2011, Springer, New York, NY.
10.1007/978-1-4419-9893-4_40 Google Scholar
- 66
Micoulaud-Franchi J.-A.,
Coelho J.,
Ouazzani Touhami K., and
Philip P., The Sleep Prism of Health, 2020, Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg, Germany.
10.1007/978-3-030-52663-4_17 Google Scholar
- 67 FACIT-Sp (Version 4), facit.org, 2007, November, 25th, 2022.
- 68 Modified Fatigue Impact Scale. Accessed November, 25th, 2022, 2023.
- 69
Boevink W.,
Kroon H.,
Delespaul P., and
Os J. V., Empowerment According to Persons with Severe Mental Illness: Development of the Netherlands Empowerment List and its Psychometric Properties, Open Journal of Psychiatry. (2017) 7, 18–30, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpsych.2017.71002.
10.4236/ojpsych.2017.71002 Google Scholar
- 70 BRAF-NRS Netherlands Dutch, 2015, Accessed January, 31st, 2022.
- 71 Garnefski N., Kraaij V., and Spinhoven P., CERQ Manual for the use of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. A Questionnaire to measure cognitive coping strategies (CERQ Handleiding voor het gebruik van de Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Een Vragenlijst Voor Het Meten Van Cognitieve Copingstrategieën). (2002) .
- 72 Sullivan M. J. L., Bishop S. R., and Pivik J., The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and Validation, Psychological Assessment. (1995) 7, 524–532, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524, 2-s2.0-0029584617.
- 73
Klooster P. M. ten,
Weekers A. M.,
Eggelmeijer F. et al., Optimism and/or Pessimism: Factoranalysis of the Dutch Life Orientation Test-Revised (Optimisme en/of pessimisme: factorstructuur van de Nederlandse Life Orientation Test-Revised), Psychologie en Gezondheid. (2010) 38, 89–100, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03089356, 2-s2.0-84882938310.
10.1007/BF03089356 Google Scholar
- 74 Braeken A. P. B. M., Kempen G. I. J. M., Watson M., Houben R. M. A., van Gils F. C. J. M., and Lechner L., Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale in Dutch Cancer Patients, Psycho-Oncology. (2010) 19, 742–749, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1628, 2-s2.0-77954167508.
- 75 Rogers S. N., Scott B., Lowe D., Ozakinci G., and Humphris G. M., Fear of Recurrence Following Head and Neck Cancer in the Outpatient Clinic, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. (2010) 267, 1943–1949, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1307-y, 2-s2.0-78449239391.
- 76 Jaarsma T. A., Pool G., Sanderman R., and Ranchor A. V., Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory Among Cancer Patients, Psycho-Oncology. (2006) 15, 911–920, https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1026, 2-s2.0-33750311269.
- 77 Arrindell W. A. and Ettema J. H. M., The Dutch Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): A Multidimensional Pyschopathological-Indicator for the Use in Somatic Patients (De Nederlandse Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): Een Multidimensionale Psychopathologie-Indicator Voor Gebruik Bij Somatische Patienten), Diagnostiek-wijzer. (2004) 3, 105–113.
- 78 Prins J. B., Bleijenberg G., Bazelmans E. et al., Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial, The Lancet. (2001) 357, 841–847, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04198-2, 2-s2.0-0035901282.
- 79 van Eck L., Clear Writing Tool, 2022, https://klinkendetaal.nl/.
- 80 van Eck L., B1 Language Level Check, 2022, https://www.ishetb1.nl/.
- 81 Mokkink L. B., Terwee C. B., Patrick D. L. et al., The COSMIN Checklist for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Studies on Measurement Properties of Health Status Measurement Instruments: An International Delphi Study, Quality of Life Research. (2010) 19, 539–549, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8, 2-s2.0-77953557449.
- 82
Fitzpatrick D. and
Buxton J., Evaluating Patient-Based Outcome Measures for Use in Clinical Trials, Health Technology Assessment. (1998) 2, https://doi.org/10.3310/hta2140.
10.3310/hta2140 Google Scholar
- 83 Mokkink L. B., Prinsen C. A., Patrick D. L. et al., COSMIN Study Design Checklist for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Instruments, BMC Medical Research Methodology. (2019) .
- 84 van Poppel M. N. M., Chin A., Paw M. J. M., and van Mechelen M., Reproducibility and validity of the Dutch version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (Reproduceerbaarheid en validiteit van de Nederlandse versie van de International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)), Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen. (2004) 82, 457–462.