Volume 2021, Issue 1 9999484
Research Article
Open Access

COX-2 Regulates the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Activated Hepatic Stellate Cells through CDC27

Yang Hu

Yang Hu

Institute of Pathogenic Biology, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hunan, China usc.edu.cn

Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Special Pathogens Prevention and Control, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan, China usc.edu.cn

Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for Molecular Target New Drug Study, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan, China usc.edu.cn

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, 336 Dongfeng South Road, Hengyang, 421002 Hunan Province, China usc.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Nian Fu

Nian Fu

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, 336 Dongfeng South Road, Hengyang, 421002 Hunan Province, China usc.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Li Xian Chen

Li Xian Chen

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, 336 Dongfeng South Road, Hengyang, 421002 Hunan Province, China usc.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Jian Hua Xiao

Corresponding Author

Jian Hua Xiao

Institute of Pathogenic Biology, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hunan, China usc.edu.cn

Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Special Pathogens Prevention and Control, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan, China usc.edu.cn

Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for Molecular Target New Drug Study, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan, China usc.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Xue Feng Yang

Corresponding Author

Xue Feng Yang

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, 336 Dongfeng South Road, Hengyang, 421002 Hunan Province, China usc.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 April 2021
Citations: 1
Academic Editor: Songwen Tan

Abstract

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an important rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandins (PGs), which can be upregulated by various stimuli. COX-2 has been shown to be involved in the occurrence and development of hepatic fibrosis by regulating the proliferation and apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in previous studies. The aims of the study are to study the mechanism of how COX-2 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of HSCs and to provide new targets for the prevention and treatment of hepatic fibrosis. A short hairpin RNA targeting COX-2 was constructed, and the changes in proliferation and apoptosis of liver tissue cells and HSCs were observed, respectively. COX-2-shRNA-1 significantly suppressed the proliferation of HSCs in vivo. Moreover, knockdown of COX-2 significantly suppressed cell proliferation and accelerated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in vitro. Among those differential genes related to cell proliferation and apoptosis, CDC27 and Sh3kbp1 were upregulated, but Plcd4 was suppressed. Mechanistically, the influence of COX-2 on HSCs partly depends on upregulating CDC27. Our results demonstrated that COX-2 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells through the CDC27 pathway. This study contributes to our understanding of the effect of COX-2 for the treatment of hepatic fibrosis.

1. Introduction

Hepatic fibrosis, a common pathophysiological process in many chronic liver diseases, is manifested by the excessive and abnormal deposition of extracellular matrix components in the liver. It is the necessary stage for the development of chronic liver disease to cirrhosis. It is now believed that liver fibrosis may be reversed to normal, while cirrhosis is not. However, there is no effective method for the treatment of liver fibrosis.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an important rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandin (PGs). COX-2 is hardly expressed in normal tissues, but can be upregulated when stimulated by various factors. Extensive research has shown that COX-2 participates in some pathological processes, such as cell malignant transformation, inflammatory response, and catalyzing the biosynthesis of arachidonic acid (AA) to affect disease processes. Research in the area of hepatic fibrosis showed that COX-2 is an important molecule that affects the development of it. Celecoxib, a COX-2 inhibitor, suppresses the hepatic fibrosis induced by bile duct ligation (BDL) and thioacetamide (TAA) [1]. Other researchers used CCL4 to replicate the model of hepatic fibrosis and found that COX-2 knockout mice had less necrosis, degeneration, and connective tissue hyperplasia than the wild-type mice [2]. These mice also had lower expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in the liver tissue and less serum hyaluronic acid (HA), collagen IV (IV-C), and collagen III (PC III). Short hairpin RNA was used to silence COX-2 in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) rats, and the liver tissue steatosis, inflammatory degree, and hepatic fibrosis were significantly reduced in COX-2 silencing rats [3].

CDC27 is a core subunit of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). APC/C is a type of E3 ligase complex that regulates chromosome segregation and mitotic exit [4]. APC/C reportedly participates in the TGF-β signaling pathway, and TGF-β activates CDC27, which promoted liver fibrosis via the TGF-β pathway in both HSC and hepatocyte [5]. Recent evidence suggests that COX-2 may be involved in the development of hepatic fibrosis by regulating the proliferation and apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). SC-236, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, had an antihepatic fibrosis effect and significantly promoted the apoptosis and growth inhibition of isolated cultured HSCs [6]. Celecoxib, another COX-2 inhibitor, has been reported to suppress the formation of hepatic fibrosis in rats by inhibiting the proliferation of platelet-derived growth factor- (PDGF-) induced HSCs and promoting the apoptosis of these HSCs [1].

However, the mechanism of how COX-2 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of HSCs remains unclear. Therefore, this study silenced the expression of COX-2 in hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells in liver fibrosis rats by using short hairpin RNA. Then the changes of proliferation and apoptosis of HSCs and related gene expression profiles after COX-2 silencing were observed. Based on our experimental results, we found that COX-2 regulated the proliferation and apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells through the CDC27 pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Model

48 male SD rats (Nanjing Junke Bioengineering Co., Ltd.) were randomly divided into four groups by body weight: control group (control), liver fibrosis model group (model), null plasmid control group (sh-NC), and COX-2-shRNA-1 group (COX-2-shRNA-1). Except for the control group, the other 3 groups were fed a high-fat diet for 12 weeks after a week of adaptive feeding. Rats in the COX-2-shRNA-1 group and the sh-NC groups were injected with adenovirus plasmids and adenovirus no-load physique grains (PBS dilution) through the caudal vein from the beginning of the high-fat diet, respectively. The dose and time of injection were 1 × 109 pfu/each and once weekly. Rats in the control group and the model group were given an equal volume of PBS through the caudal vein. After 12 weeks of rearing, the rats were sacrificed by caesarean section to take 0.5~1.5 g of the left lateral lobe of the rat liver and immediately put it into ice-cold William E medium filled with a mixed gas of 95% oxygen and 5% CO for subsequent experiments. This experiment had been approved by the Animal Management Committee of our hospital.

2.2. Reverse Transcription-PCR

Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was used to detect the mRNA expression of COX-2, α-SMA, CDC27, Sh3kbp1, Serpinb2, cxcl10, Dusp6, Dusp1, TP53, and Phlcd4. Total RNA from each liver sample and HSCs was extracted by Trizol reagent (Generay Biotech, China), and cDNA was synthesized by using Revert Aid First Strand cDNA synthesis Kit (Ferramentas, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was performed under the manufacturer’s manual. Band intensity was measured by a densitometer and was normalized for comparison. RT-PCR was performed on target gene using specific primers (Table 1). GAPDH was selected as the internal reference gene. The expression level of gene was analyzed using the equation 2ΔΔCT method, where ΔΔCT = ΔCTexperimental groupΔCTcontrol group; ΔCTexperimental group = CTtarget gene,experimental group − CTinternal reference gene,experimental group; ΔCTcontrol group = CTtarget gene,control group − CTinternal reference gene,control group; and 2ΔΔCT represents the multiple expression of gene in the experimental group relative to the control group.

Table 1. The sequences and products of amplified gene primer.
Gene Primer Sequences Length (bp)
COX-2
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. ATCTAGTCTGGAGTGGGAGG
  2. AATGAGTACCGCAAACGCTT
420
α-SMA
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. TGTGCTGGACTCTGGAGATG
  2. GATCACCTGCCCATCAGG
292
Serpinb2
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. GTAGATGTGAACGAGGAGG
  2. GTATGGTGCGGGTAATGT
142
Cdc27
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. ACTGGCGACCTGTTACTA
  2. CTGGCTTCTCACCTATTT
359
Sh3kbp1
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. AGAAATGGACAGCAGGAC
  2. TTGTTTGATGACAGGAGC
271
Dusp1
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. TTGTTTGATGACAGGAGC
  2. TGGAGACAGGGAAGTTGAAGA
171
Dusp6
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. CACGGTGACAGTGGCTTAC
  2. AGACATTCTGGTTGGAGG
215
TP53
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. GGAGTGCAAAGAGAGCACTG
  2. CTCATTCAGCTCTCGGAACA
134
Cxcl10
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. TTCCTGCAAGTCTATCCTG
  2. TGTTCTTCTTCATTGTGGC
170
Plcd4
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. TTTTGGCAACATTAGCAC
  2. GACAACCAGGGCAGATAG
438
GAPDH
  1. Forward
  2. Reverse
  1. TATCGGACGCCTGGTTAC
  2. GCATCAAAGGTGGAAGAAT
852

2.3. Immunohistochemistry

Liver tissues were fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution for 3 to 5 days. Then, tissues were removed from the fixative solution and trimmed to an appropriate shape and thickness. Tissues were dehydrated, transparented, and embedded in wax, then dewaxed with xylene and rehydrated with gradient alcohol. Three of the most important steps were blocking and inactivating endogenous peroxidase and performing antigen retrieval. Primary antibodies anti COX-2 and α-SMA were used and incubated overnight in a refrigerator at 4°C (PBS buffer solution instead of primary antibody as a negative control). The samples were transferred to room temperature and equilibrated for 30 minutes and rinsed with PBS for 3 × 5 minutes before adding a secondary antibody. The secondary antibody was incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes and rinsed with PBS for 3 × 5 minutes. DAB staining was used.

2.4. Culture of HSC Cell Lines

HSC cell lines (HSC-T6) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a cell incubator. Cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) plus 1% 100 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates and grown to reach 70% confluence before transfection. For transfecting cells, cells were transfected with different plasmids using FuGENE HD Transfection reagent (Roche, Switzerland) following the manual instruction. Then, transfected cells were harvested for molecular assays.

2.5. Cell Transfection

shRNA targeting COX-2 (COX-2-shRNA) or CDC27 (sh-CDC27) were synthesized by Win Run Biotechnology Co, Ltd. (Changsha, China). The applied shRNA sequences for COX-2 were as follows: COX-shRNA-1, 5 -CCTCGTCCAGATGCTATCTTT-3 ; COX-shRNA-2, 5 -AGTTCCAGTATCAGAACCGCATTGCCTCT-3 ; and COX-shRNA-3, 5 -GACACCTTCAACATTGAAGACCAGGAGTA-3 . The applied shRNA sequences targeting CDC27 were 5 -CCGGGCCTATAACAGTGACTTGATTCTCGAGAATCAAGTCACTGTTATAGGCTTTTTTG-3 . According to the manufacturer’s protocol, HSC-T6 cells (5 × 105) were seeded in 6-well plates, incubated for 24 h, and then 200 ng/ml specific shRNA or negative control (NC) was transfected into the cells by using Lipofectamine®2000 (Invitrogen; USA). Effects of the shRNA were evaluated by western blotting and RT-PCR. A fluorescence microscope was used to observe the expression of green fluorescent protein in cells to evaluate the fluorescence density.

2.6. MTT Assay

Cells were treated for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. Then, 5 mg/ml MTT solution (in PBS) was added into the basal medium at 1 : 10 ratio. After 4-hour incubation, the remaining MTT solution was removed, and cells were solubilized with dimethyl sulfoxide. Optical density (OD) values were measured at the wavelength of 490 nm to reflect cell viability: cell proliferation rate = (experimental group OD − control group OD)/(NC group OD − control group OD).

2.7. Flow Cytometry Assay

HSC-T6 cells were harvested after 48 h posttransfection. The culture medium was then changed into serum-free Hank’s balanced salt solution. Then, cells were rinsed in pre-cold PBS. Fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) conjugated Annexin V and propidium iodine (PI) staining buffer were sequentially added. Cell apoptosis was then measured on a flow cytometry (BD, USA).

2.8. Cell Cycle Assay

Cell cycle of HSC-T6 cells was monitored by flow cytometry. After 48 h posttransfection, all groups of HSC-T6 cells were digested by trypsin and were washed in precold PBS. Cells were fixed by 70% cold ethanol overnight and were resuspended in 100 μg/ml RNase A in PBS for 30 min incubation at 37°C. Cell nuclei were stained by 50 μg/ml PI for 30 min. Cell cycle was then measured on flow cytometry using fluorescent-assisted cell sorting (FACS).

2.9. DNA Microarray Assay and Data Analysis

Microarray-based oligonucleotide hybridization approach was used to quantify expression levels of target gene [4]. In brief, total RNA was obtained as mentioned above. Then, the obtained sample RNA was labeled by fluorescence and turned into DNA. The labeled DNA was dissolved in 80 μl hybridization solution (3 × SSC, 0.2% SDS, 5 × Denharts, and 25% formamide) and hybridized at 42°C overnight. After the hybridization is completed, it was first washed in a liquid containing 0.2% SDS and 2 × SSC at 42°C for 5 min and then washed in a 0.2 × SSC medium for 5 minutes in room temperature. After the slide is dried, it can be used for scanning. LuxScan 3.0 software (CapitalBio Corp., China) was used firstly to transform images into digital signals. Linear correction across chips was performed based on global mean values of cy5 and cy3 signals for normalization of means. All data from this experiment can be divided into three groups: (1) all data include the whole signal data set containing those with or without differential expressions, and ratio values were defined after Lowess normalization. (2) Checked genes include those genes with effective signals after assay. (3) Differentially expressed genes were screened out and annotated by pathway and GO database for functional assay and statistical analysis using Capital Bio software.

2.10. Western Blotting

Western blotting was used to quantify the expression of COX-2 and CDC27. In brief, rat hepatic tissues or cultured HSCs were lysed in RIPA buffer and proteins were quantified by BCA kit. About 20~40ug protein samples were loaded onto SDS-PAGE gel for electrophoresis separation and were transferred to PVDF membrane. After blocking, the membrane was incubated with primary antibody including rabbit anti-COX-2 (#12282, CST, USA), rabbit anti-CDC27 (#9499, CST, USA), and rabbit anti-β-actin (#4970, CST, USA) overnight. On the next day, HRP-conjugated secondary antibody was added for room temperature incubation for 2 h. The membrane was then developed by ECL substrate, and images were captured by a computerized system.

2.11. Statistics

All data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The differences between two groups were analyzed using unpaired Student’s t-test. One-way ANOVA was used for multiple groups. A statistical significance was defined when p < 0.05. All statistical analyses was performed using SPSS18.0 software.

3. Results

3.1. COX-2 Expression in Each Group after Knocking Down COX-2

To evaluate the transfection efficiency of COX-2-shRNA, the fluorescence density of cells exceeded 70-85%, as observed by the fluorescent microscope (Figure 1(a)). No fluorescent signal was observed in the control group, indicating a successful cell transfection. All the three-specific shRNA of COX-2 downregulate the COX-2 expression after transfection of 48 hours and 72 hours, and the most significant effect was caused by COX-2-shRNA-1 (p < 0.001, Figure 1(b)). After transfection of 24 hours, COX-2 mRNA decreased in the COX-2-shRNA-1-transfected group (p < 0.05). Further analysis of the results showed that a remarkably decreased COX-2 protein expression in the COX-2-shRNA-1-transfected group at 48 h (p < 0.05) while the other two groups showed no major difference (Figure 1(c)). What emerges from the results reported here is that the construction of shRNA targeting COX-2 is successful and can be used for further experiments.

Details are in the caption following the image
COX-2 expression in each group after knocking down COX-2. (a) Green fluorescent protein expression was observed by a fluorescent microscope after transfection with COX-2-shRNA-1, COX-2-shRNA-2, and COX-2-shRNA-3 (magnification 100x). (b) RT-PCR was used to measure the efficiency of shRNA-mediated gene knockdown in 24, 48, and 72 hours. (c) The protein levels of COX-2 were significantly inhibited by COX-2-shRNA-1.  p < 0.05;  ∗∗∗p < 0.001; and ns: no significant difference, compared with the sh-NC group and control group.
Details are in the caption following the image
COX-2 expression in each group after knocking down COX-2. (a) Green fluorescent protein expression was observed by a fluorescent microscope after transfection with COX-2-shRNA-1, COX-2-shRNA-2, and COX-2-shRNA-3 (magnification 100x). (b) RT-PCR was used to measure the efficiency of shRNA-mediated gene knockdown in 24, 48, and 72 hours. (c) The protein levels of COX-2 were significantly inhibited by COX-2-shRNA-1.  p < 0.05;  ∗∗∗p < 0.001; and ns: no significant difference, compared with the sh-NC group and control group.
Details are in the caption following the image
COX-2 expression in each group after knocking down COX-2. (a) Green fluorescent protein expression was observed by a fluorescent microscope after transfection with COX-2-shRNA-1, COX-2-shRNA-2, and COX-2-shRNA-3 (magnification 100x). (b) RT-PCR was used to measure the efficiency of shRNA-mediated gene knockdown in 24, 48, and 72 hours. (c) The protein levels of COX-2 were significantly inhibited by COX-2-shRNA-1.  p < 0.05;  ∗∗∗p < 0.001; and ns: no significant difference, compared with the sh-NC group and control group.

3.2. Knockdown of COX-2 Suppresses Proliferation of HSCs in Liver Tissue of Rats with Hepatic Fibrosis

To investigate the effect of COX-2 on proliferation and apoptosis of HSCs in the liver tissue of rats with hepatic fibrosis, we firstly generated a rat model in which COX-2 nanomedicine-shRNA-1 was injected. As the first evidence to support COX-2 nanomedicine for liver fibrosis, western blotting showed that the expression level of COX-2 nanomedicine in liver fibrosis model rats was significantly increased, and it can be effectively inhibited by transfection with COX-2 nanomedicine-shRNA-1 (p < 0.05, Figure 2(a)). As the indicator of HSC proliferation, the expression patterns of α-SMA showed similarity with COX-2 nanomedicine, as shown by the elevated expression in the model group and the downregulated expression in the COX-2 nanomedicine-shRNA-1 group (p < 0.05, Figure 2(b)). Detection of COX-2 nanomedicine and α-SMA in liver tissues by immunohistochemistry indicated that the expression trends of COX-2 nanomedicine and α-SMA were consistent with the results of western blotting (Figure 2(c)). Taken together, these results suggest that knockdown of COX-2 nanomedicine suppresses proliferation of HSCs in the liver tissue of rats with hepatic fibrosis.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Western blotting for the protein expression of COX-2 after shRNA injection in hepatic tissues. (b) Western blotting for the protein expression of α-SMA after shRNA injection in hepatic tissues. (c) Detection the expression of COX-2 and α-SMA by immunohistochemistry in the liver tissue in rats (magnification 200x).  p < 0.05, compared with the sh-NC group and COX-2-shRNA-1 group.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Western blotting for the protein expression of COX-2 after shRNA injection in hepatic tissues. (b) Western blotting for the protein expression of α-SMA after shRNA injection in hepatic tissues. (c) Detection the expression of COX-2 and α-SMA by immunohistochemistry in the liver tissue in rats (magnification 200x).  p < 0.05, compared with the sh-NC group and COX-2-shRNA-1 group.
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Western blotting for the protein expression of COX-2 after shRNA injection in hepatic tissues. (b) Western blotting for the protein expression of α-SMA after shRNA injection in hepatic tissues. (c) Detection the expression of COX-2 and α-SMA by immunohistochemistry in the liver tissue in rats (magnification 200x).  p < 0.05, compared with the sh-NC group and COX-2-shRNA-1 group.

3.3. Cox-2-shRNA-1 Suppressed Proliferation and Induced Apoptosis of HSCs In Vitro

Next, we investigated the effect of COX-2 knockdown on hepatic cell proliferation and apoptosis in vitro. Cell proliferation was remarkably inhibited after transfection at 72 h as demonstrated by the MTT assay (p < 0.05, Figure 3(a)). Further analysis of the cell cycle revealed that knockdown of COX-2 increased the percentage of cells arresting at G1 phase (Figure 3(b)). Moreover, cell apoptotic rate in the COX-2-shRNA-1 group was found significantly higher by FACS (p < 0.01, Figure 3(c)). Overall, these results suggest that knockdown of COX-2 effectively suppressed hepatic stellate cell proliferation and accelerating their apoptosis.

Details are in the caption following the image
Knockdown of COX-2 suppressed stellate cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis. (a) MTT assay for relative cell proliferation rate of HSCs after COX-2 knockdown. (b) Cell cycle analysis for cultured HSCs after COX-2 knockdown. (c) Flow cytometry approach for measuring changes in apoptotic rate after COX-2 knockdown.  p < 0.05;  ∗∗p < 0.01; and ns: no significant difference, compared with the sh-NC group.
Details are in the caption following the image
Knockdown of COX-2 suppressed stellate cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis. (a) MTT assay for relative cell proliferation rate of HSCs after COX-2 knockdown. (b) Cell cycle analysis for cultured HSCs after COX-2 knockdown. (c) Flow cytometry approach for measuring changes in apoptotic rate after COX-2 knockdown.  p < 0.05;  ∗∗p < 0.01; and ns: no significant difference, compared with the sh-NC group.
Details are in the caption following the image
Knockdown of COX-2 suppressed stellate cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis. (a) MTT assay for relative cell proliferation rate of HSCs after COX-2 knockdown. (b) Cell cycle analysis for cultured HSCs after COX-2 knockdown. (c) Flow cytometry approach for measuring changes in apoptotic rate after COX-2 knockdown.  p < 0.05;  ∗∗p < 0.01; and ns: no significant difference, compared with the sh-NC group.

3.4. Changes in Expression of Dynamic Genes of Hepatic Stellate Cells after Knockdown of COX-2

To further investigate the mechanism of COX-2 in regulating proliferation and apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells, gene chip assay was used to compare differential between the untreated and treated cells. Gene chip results showed that 37 genes were upregulated and 8 genes were downregulated after shRNA transfection with 48 hours (Table 2). Analysis of cells after 72 hours transfection showed that 50 genes in HSCs showed increased, while 46 genes showed decreased (Table 3). We also performed GO annotation on those differentially expressed genes, among which three proliferation-associated genes were upregulated (Il6, Csf2, and Atf3) at 48 h, but without any downregulated gene. At 72 h, three proliferation genes (CDC27, TP53, and Cxcl10) were unregulated and three genes (DUsp1, Serpinb2, and Plcd4) were downregulated. For all 8 genes associated with cell apoptosis, we found four of them (Il1b, Il6, Ccl2, and Phlda3) were upregulated at 48 h and without any gene down-regulated. At 72 h, Tp53 was upregulated while Sh3kbp1, Pea15, and Plcd4 were suppressed (Tables 13). Those genes with significant changes were further validated by RT-PCR. As the results demonstrated that COX-2-shRNA-1 elevated CDC27, but decreased the Plcd4 gene transcripts. However, opposite trends were observed as Sh3kbp1 was upregulated, plus DUsp1 upregulated, in sharp contrast with DNA chip assay (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). No significant change was found in other candidate genes (Figure 4(c)). In summary, COX-2-shRNA-1 modulated the cell proliferation and apoptosis related to the change in the expression of CDC27 and Plcd4.

Table 2. Differential gene expression profiles between COX-2-shRNA-1 and sh-NC at 48 hours posttransfection.
Oligo_id Name Ratio Description
1 Rn30002068 Ppef2 7.8223 Protein phosphatase
2 Rn30009092 3.1274 Immunoresponsive gene 1
3 R001746_01 Cxcl10 2.4468 Small inducible cytokine B10 precursor
4 Rn30015483 Gbp4 2.4271 Similar to guanylate nucleotide-binding protein 4
5 Rn30001057 Oasl1 2.4164 2 -5 -Oligoadenylate synthetase-like 1
6 Rn30004185 2.3045 Antisense RNA overlapping MCH protein.
7 Rn30021148 Ifit3 2.2743 Tetratricopeptide repeat 3
8 Rn30015485 Gbp4 2.2279 Similar to guanylate nucleotide-binding protein 4
9 Rn30001055 Oasl1 2.2037 2 -5 -Oligoadenylate synthetase-like 1
10 Rn30020145 2.1558
11 R000595_01 Cx3cl1 2.0349 Chemokine (C-X3-C motif) ligand 1
12 Rn30020616 Cxcl11 1.9534 Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 11
13 R001188_01 Il1b 1.9086 Interleukin-1 beta precursor (IL-1 beta).
14 Rn30005625 Mdm2 1.8729 Similar to mdm2 gene product
15 Rn30024865 isg12(b) 1.8722 Putative ISG12(B) protein.
16 Rn30016690 Isg20 1.8707 Interferon-stimulated protein (predicted)
17 Rn30021722 Apol9a 1.8058
18 Rn30005624 Mdm2 1.767 Similar to mdm2 gene product
19 R003548_01 Kcnt1 1.7082 Potassium channel subfamily T member 1
20 Rn30015487 Gbp5 1.6855 Similar to guanylate-binding protein 5
21 R003549_01 Csf2 1.6817 Colony-stimulating factor
22 R001026_01 Atf3 1.665 Cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-3
23 Rn30004011 Scin 1.6441 Scinderin
24 R001191_01 Il6 1.6382 Interleukin-6
25 Rn30015486 Gbp5 1.6332 Similar to guanylate-binding protein 5
26 Rn30008444 Ifi27l 1.6328 Putative ISG12(a) protein
27 Rn30008951 Elovl4 1.6118 Similar to Elovl4
28 Rn30016019 Irf7 1.5875 Interferon regulatory factor 7
29 R002891_01 Cyp2d4v1 1.573 Cytochrome P450 2D18
30 Rn30001796 Mx2 1.5626 Interferon-induced GTP-binding protein Mx3.
31 R000644_01 Ccl2 1.5596 Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2
32 Rn30023693 1.5285
33 Rn30026248 1.528 Macrophage inflammatory protein 2-beta precursor
34 Rn30016526 Ccdc37 1.5222 Similar to C230069K22Rik protein
35 Rn30012826 Aadac 1.5185 Arylacetamide deacetylase
36 Rn30001056 Oasl2 1.5141 2 -5 -Oligoadenylate synthetase-like 2
37 Rn30008269 Phlda3 1.502 Pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 3
38 R003539_01 Mapk8ip1 0.6656 C-Jun-amino-terminal kinase-interacting protein 1
39 Rn30026086 0.6545 Ankyrin repeat domain 11
40 Rn30018744 Ptov1 0.6483 Prostate tumor overexpressed gene 1
41 Rn30003851 Sh3kbp1 0.6376 SH3-domain kinase binding protein 1
42 Rn30001871 0.6282 Steroid-sensitive protein 1
43 R002280_01 Thra_v2 0.6144 Thyroid hormone receptor alpha
44 R002312_01 Pla2g2a 0.512 Phospholipase A2, membrane-associated precursor
45 Rn30001610 0.4945 Leucine-rich repeats and calponin homology (CH) domain containing 3
Table 3. Differential gene expression profiles between COX-2-shRNA-1 and sh-NC at 72 hours posttransfection.
Oligo_id Name Ratio Description
1 Rn30022454 6.1452 Tripartite motif-containing 65
2 Rn30006362 Purb 3.4474
3 R001746_01 Cxcl10 2.8634 Small inducible cytokine B10 precursor
4 Rn30020145 2.652
5 Rn30001057 Oasl1 2.6028 2 -5 -Oligoadenylate synthetase-like 1
6 Rn30005291 Cdc27 2.4796 Cell division cycle 27 homolog
7 Rn30006471 2.3552 PFTAIRE protein kinase 1
8 Rn30015483 Gbp4 2.3519 Similar to guanylate nucleotide-binding protein 4
9 Rn30021673 2.3392 ¨C
10 R000595_01 Cx3cl1 2.3344 Fractalkine precursor
11 Rn30001055 Oasl1 2.3048 2 -5 -Oligoadenylate synthetase-like 1
12 Rn30002812 Enah 2.2328 Enabled homolog
13 Rn30018127 2.2025 Diaphanous homolog 1
14 Rn30024865 isg12(b) 2.2007 Putative ISG12(B) protein
15 Rn30025470 2.1365 RNA-binding motif protein 27
16 Rn30025880 2.0773 Topoisomerase (DNA) II beta-binding protein
17 Rn30021148 Ifit3 2.0594 Human interferon-inducible proteins
18 Rn30002530 Rfc1 2.035 VIP-receptor-gene repressor protein
19 Rn30006955 1.9683 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase G
20 Rn30024339 Gbf1 1.9515 Golgi-specific brefeldin A-resistance factor 1
21 Rn30015485 Gbp4 1.9459 Similar to guanylate nucleotide-binding protein 4
22 Rn30009903 Trp53 1.8363 Cellular tumor antigen p53
23 Rn30010375
24 Rn30006914 Loxl3 1.7087 Similar to lysyl oxidase-like 3
25 Rn30018257 Hsp90ab1 1.7047 Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta (HSP 84).
26 Rn30016830 Chd4 1.6964 Mi-2 autoantigen
27 Rn30021722 Apol9a 1.6932 ¨C
28 Rn30015487 Gbp5 1.6803 Similar to guanylate-binding protein 5
29 Rn30009073 1.6721 ¨C
30 Rn30008992 1.6509 WAS protein family, member 2
31 Rn30017948 Psmb10 1.6478 Proteasome subunit, beta type 10
32 Rn30005283 1.644 Rap1 interacting factor 1 homolog (yeast)
33 Rn30019336 Pogz 1.6139 Pogo transposable element with ZNF domain
34 Rn30023995 NIPBL 1.6115 PREDICTED: similar to delangin
35 Rn30021836 Olr1214 1.5675 Olfactory receptor Olr1214
36 R003169_01 Acsl6 1.5651 Long-chain-fatty-acid–CoA ligase 6
37 R004194_01 Zfp709 1.565 Zinc finger protein 14
38 Rn30004337 RGD1565597 1.5561 Similar to RIKEN cDNA 2210421G13
39 Rn30007454 1.5487 Complement receptor 2
40 Rn30003220 1.545 13-day embryo male testis cDNA
41 Rn30015924 Trub1 1.5415 TruB pseudouridine (psi) synthase homolog 1
42 Rn30019481 Gabpb2 1.5354 Transcription factor GABP beta 2-1 chain
43 Rn30009011 RGD1305500 1.5248 DNA segment, Chr 19, ERATO Doi 737
44 Rn30015486 Gbp5 1.5204 Guanylate-binding protein 5
45 Rn30015488 1.5197 Guanylate nucleotide-binding protein 2
46 R002891_01 Cyp2d4v1 1.5187 Cytochrome P450 2D18
47 Rn30016434 1.5155 RGD1310888-predicted protein
48 Rn30001002 1.5108
49 R001164_01 1.5085 Granzyme M precursor
50 Rn30023011 1.5073
51 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.6661 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
52 Rn30010844 0.6653
53 R002646_01 0.665
54 Rn30013433 Med31 0.6623 RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 31
55 Rn30003203 Dynlt3 0.6605 T-complex-associated testis-expressed 1-like
56 Rn30022044 0.6596
57 Rn30003825 Nt5c1b 0.6581 Retinol dehydrogenase 14
58 Rn30025065 P4ha2 0.6576 Procollagen-proline, 2-oxoglutarate-4-dioxygenase, alpha II polypeptide
59 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.6555 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
60 Rn30019963 0.6548
61 Rn30005770 Ero1l 0.6482 ERO1-like protein alpha precursor
62 Rn30024141 0.6465 ¨C
63 Rn30019903 Rassf1 0.6464 Ras association domain family 1 isoform 2
64 Rn30003533 Dusp1 0.6461 Dual specificity protein phosphatase 1
65 Rn30020658 RGD1563649 0.6446 Similar to ORF4
66 Rn30006166 Pea15a 0.6435 Phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes 15
67 Rn30012217 Arg1 0.6427 Arginase-1 (EC 3.5.3.1)
68 Rn30023334 0.6392
69 Rn30023867 Rnase1l2 0.6379
70 Rn30002222 Pgk1 0.6341 Phosphoglycerate kinase 1
71 R002211_01 Aldoc 0.6301 Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase C
72 Rn30002683 RGD1560553 0.6288 PREDICTED: similar to hypoxia-induced gene 1
73 Rn30018943 0.6233 DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase
74 Rn30006243 0.619
75 Rn30025357 0.6154
76 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.6086 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
77 Rn30003851 Sh3kbp1 0.6013 SH3-domain kinase binding protein 1
78 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.5944 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
79 Rn30005084 LOC499742 0.5851 LRRGT00150.
80 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.5848 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
81 Rn30015841 Bnip3 0.581 BCL2/adenovirus E1B-interacting protein 3
82 Rn30014271 RGD1559815 0.5793 Da1-12
83 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.5732 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
84 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.5731 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
85 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.5706 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
86 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.5699 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
87 Rn30026196 Hist1h4m 0.5511 Histone H4.
89 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.545 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
90 Rn30024135 LOC499698 0.5425 C-reactive protein precursor.
91 Rn30000745 Hspa1b 0.5364 Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A/1B
92 Rn30015672 Car9 0.51 Similar to carbonic anhydrase 9
93 Rn30004468 Upp1 0.4769 Uridine phosphorylase 1
94 Rn30014956 Plcd4 0.4744 Phospholipase C, delta 4
95 R001854_01 Ccl20 0.4709 Small inducible cytokine A20 precursor
96 Rn30022206 Dusp6 0.4411 Dual specificity protein phosphatase 6
Details are in the caption following the image
Differential gene expression profiles in COX-2 knockdown cells. (a) Expression of CDC27 and Sh3kbp1 were detected by RT-PCR in cells. (b) Expression of Phlcd4 and Dusp1 was detected by RT-PCR. (c) The expressions of Serpinb2, cxcl10, Dusp6, and TP53 genes were measured by RT-PCR.  p < 0.05 and  ∗∗p < 0.01, compared with the sh-NC group.
Details are in the caption following the image
Differential gene expression profiles in COX-2 knockdown cells. (a) Expression of CDC27 and Sh3kbp1 were detected by RT-PCR in cells. (b) Expression of Phlcd4 and Dusp1 was detected by RT-PCR. (c) The expressions of Serpinb2, cxcl10, Dusp6, and TP53 genes were measured by RT-PCR.  p < 0.05 and  ∗∗p < 0.01, compared with the sh-NC group.
Details are in the caption following the image
Differential gene expression profiles in COX-2 knockdown cells. (a) Expression of CDC27 and Sh3kbp1 were detected by RT-PCR in cells. (b) Expression of Phlcd4 and Dusp1 was detected by RT-PCR. (c) The expressions of Serpinb2, cxcl10, Dusp6, and TP53 genes were measured by RT-PCR.  p < 0.05 and  ∗∗p < 0.01, compared with the sh-NC group.

3.5. COX-2-shRNA-1 Regulated the Proliferation and Apoptosis of HSCs through Regulating CDC27

CDC27 has been demonstrated in modulating cell proliferation [7] and apoptosis of tumor cells [8]. Therefore, we speculate that COX-2 may affect cell proliferation and apoptosis by affecting CDC27. Our conjecture was confirmed by the results that knockdown of COX-2 significantly elevated the protein level of CDC27, and this can be attenuated by knockdown of CDC27 (Figure 5(a)). The role of CDC27 on hepatic stellate cell proliferation was further investigated. Compared with the COX-2-shRNA-1 group, increased cell proliferation in the COX-2-shRNA-1+ sh-CDC27 group indicated the proproliferation effect of CDC27 (Figure 5(b)). In the previous results, knockdown of COX-2 induced more cells to arrest in G0/G1 phase, but on this basis, knockdown of CDC27 showed a weakened effect (Figure 5(c)). Cotransfection of CDC27-shRNA and COX-2-shRNA-1 decreased the cell apoptotic rate when compared with the COX-2-shRNA-1 group, suggesting that knockdown of CDC27 attenuated the proapoptotic effect of COX-2-shRNA-1 in HSCs (Figure 5(d)). What emerges from the results reported in the above is that COX-2 knockdown suppressed proliferation and accelerated apoptosis via activating CDC27 expression in HSCs.

Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of shRNA-mediated COX-2 knockdown on HSCs related with the changed expression of CDC27. (a) Western blotting for CDC27 protein expression in all groups. (b) Cell proliferation was detected in cotransfection of COX-2 and CDC27 shRNA cells, COX-2-shRNA-1 cells, and sh-NC cells. (c) HSC-T6 cells were transfected with COX-2-shRNA-1, or sh-NC, or cotransfected with COX-2-shRNA-1 and sh-CDC27. Cell cycle analysis was examined by flow cytometry. (d) Apoptosis of HSC-T6 cells transfected with COX-2-shRNA and CDC27-shRNA, COX-2 nanomedicine-shRNA-1, and sh-NC was examined by flow cytometry.  p < 0.05 and  ∗∗∗p < 0.001, compared with the sh-NC group and COX-2-shRNA-1 group.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of shRNA-mediated COX-2 knockdown on HSCs related with the changed expression of CDC27. (a) Western blotting for CDC27 protein expression in all groups. (b) Cell proliferation was detected in cotransfection of COX-2 and CDC27 shRNA cells, COX-2-shRNA-1 cells, and sh-NC cells. (c) HSC-T6 cells were transfected with COX-2-shRNA-1, or sh-NC, or cotransfected with COX-2-shRNA-1 and sh-CDC27. Cell cycle analysis was examined by flow cytometry. (d) Apoptosis of HSC-T6 cells transfected with COX-2-shRNA and CDC27-shRNA, COX-2 nanomedicine-shRNA-1, and sh-NC was examined by flow cytometry.  p < 0.05 and  ∗∗∗p < 0.001, compared with the sh-NC group and COX-2-shRNA-1 group.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of shRNA-mediated COX-2 knockdown on HSCs related with the changed expression of CDC27. (a) Western blotting for CDC27 protein expression in all groups. (b) Cell proliferation was detected in cotransfection of COX-2 and CDC27 shRNA cells, COX-2-shRNA-1 cells, and sh-NC cells. (c) HSC-T6 cells were transfected with COX-2-shRNA-1, or sh-NC, or cotransfected with COX-2-shRNA-1 and sh-CDC27. Cell cycle analysis was examined by flow cytometry. (d) Apoptosis of HSC-T6 cells transfected with COX-2-shRNA and CDC27-shRNA, COX-2 nanomedicine-shRNA-1, and sh-NC was examined by flow cytometry.  p < 0.05 and  ∗∗∗p < 0.001, compared with the sh-NC group and COX-2-shRNA-1 group.
Details are in the caption following the image
Effects of shRNA-mediated COX-2 knockdown on HSCs related with the changed expression of CDC27. (a) Western blotting for CDC27 protein expression in all groups. (b) Cell proliferation was detected in cotransfection of COX-2 and CDC27 shRNA cells, COX-2-shRNA-1 cells, and sh-NC cells. (c) HSC-T6 cells were transfected with COX-2-shRNA-1, or sh-NC, or cotransfected with COX-2-shRNA-1 and sh-CDC27. Cell cycle analysis was examined by flow cytometry. (d) Apoptosis of HSC-T6 cells transfected with COX-2-shRNA and CDC27-shRNA, COX-2 nanomedicine-shRNA-1, and sh-NC was examined by flow cytometry.  p < 0.05 and  ∗∗∗p < 0.001, compared with the sh-NC group and COX-2-shRNA-1 group.

4. Discussion

The primary effector cell in hepatic fibrosis is the HSCs [9]. HSCs are activated and transformed from quiescent to activated when the liver is damaged by mechanical stimulation or the inflammation. Activated HSCs have a strong ability to synthesize extracellular matrix, then leading to the formation of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. Therefore, inhibiting the proliferation of HSCs and promoting its apoptosis have become the main strategy to treat liver fibrosis [10].

Previous studies have shown that COX-2 may be involved in the development of hepatic fibrosis by regulating the proliferation and apoptosis of HSCs [4]. SC-236 was used to prevent the occurrence of carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats, which is mainly related to its regulation on the apoptosis and proliferation of HSCs [4]. However, the side effect of COX-2 inhibitors such as cardiovascular events or gastrointestinal bleeding limits its wide application [11]. Therefore, the nucleotide-based inhibitor for gene expression has been raised as a novel treatment approach. RNA interference (RNAi), a phenomenon of posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS), provides new insights for treating liver fibrosis [12]. Previous experiments showed that COX-2-shRNA-1 can effectively treat experimental liver fibrosis [3].

In this study, we found that knockdown of COX-2 effectively suppressed the proliferation of HSCs in the liver of rats with hepatic fibrosis, which has been proved by the decrease in α-SMA and the number of α-SMA immune-positive cells. More clearly, knockdown of COX-2 suppressed proliferation and facilitated apoptosis of HSCs. Our results were consistent with most literature reports [1, 6]. We argue that the regulation of COX-2 on HSC cell behavior might be the primary mechanism of it in hepatic fibrosis pathogenesis.

For the further evidences of COX-2 in regulating hepatic fibrosis, we employed mRNA microarray assay to examine the expression of a series of proliferative and apoptotic relative genes. Knockdown of COX-2 in HSCs leads to some cell proliferation genes to change; some of them upregulated, such as Il6, Csf2, Atf3, Cdc27, Tp53, and Cxcl10; and some of them downregulated including Dusp1, Serpinb2, and Plcd4. As for the apoptotic related genes, upregulation of Il1b, Il6, Ccl2, Phlda3, and Tp53 and downregulation of Sh3kbp1, Peal5, and Plcd4 genes were demonstrated. Sh3kbp1 gene may regulate various cell behaviors [13], and Plcd4 gene expression was associated with breast cancer cell proliferation [14]; CXCL10 induced cell proliferation and apoptosis [15, 16]. After silencing the COX-2 gene in HSCs, the expression of CDC27 is enhanced, which is the only gene with consistent results in DNA chips and RT-PCR. CDC27 was previously reported to facilitate proliferation [7]. It has potent protein binding affinity [8, 17] and participates in various biological processes including ubiquitination mediated proteolysis [18], cell cycle regulation [19], cell division [20], and transformation at metaphase of mitosis [21, 22]. In this study, we found that CDC27 knockdown could accelerate HSC proliferation and inhibit cell apoptosis, indicating that RNAi silencing of COX-2 could modulate HSCs growth, inhibit cell proliferation, and induce cell apoptosis via CDC27 upregulation. Moreover, CDC27 has been postulated to be one major target for induced cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in cancer cells [23]. The expression of COX-2 and CDC27 has been associated during immune response regarding macrophage proliferation [24]. This study, on the other hand, revealed the regulation of CDC27 gene expression by COX-2 knockdown, suggesting that CDC27 exerted its role at the downstream of COX-2. Our data thus provide the first-hand information on how COX-2 regulates HSC proliferation, cell cycle, and cell apoptosis by regulating CDC27 gene expression, revealing an unknown pathway of HSC behavior. However, the detailed molecular mechanism for COX-2 regulation on CDC27 gene expression is still unclear yet and thus requires further mechanistic studies to fulfill the weakness of the current study.

In summary, the current study described the regulation of HSC proliferation and apoptosis by COX-2/CDC27 axis and found that such regulatory pathway played important roles in mediating severity of hepatic fibrosis. Our overall findings provide a promising treatment target for early intervention of liver fibrosis.

Ethical Approval

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of South China (2011002A), Hengyang, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial, or otherwise.

Authors’ Contributions

Yang Hu designed the experiments. Yang Hu, Li Xian Chen, and Nian Fu performed the experiments and analyzed the date. Yang Hu wrote the manuscript. Jian Hua Xiao and Xue Feng Yang have modified the language expression of the article. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission (No. A2017015), the Hunan Provincial Union Fund for Natural Science and Cities (No. 2016JJ5010), the financial support from the Program for Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department (No. 2018DK51707), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81373465).

    Data Availability

    The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.