Volume 2021, Issue 1 1995766
Research Article
Open Access

Identification of Chemical Components of Qi-Fu-Yin and Its Prototype Components and Metabolites in Rat Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid via UPLC-Q-TOF-MS

Hengyu Li

Hengyu Li

Innovative Institute of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China sdutcm.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Hongwei Zhao

Hongwei Zhao

Innovative Institute of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China sdutcm.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Yong Yang

Yong Yang

Innovative Institute of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China sdutcm.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Dongmei Qi

Dongmei Qi

Innovative Institute of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China sdutcm.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaorui Cheng

Corresponding Author

Xiaorui Cheng

Innovative Institute of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China sdutcm.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Jiafeng Wang

Corresponding Author

Jiafeng Wang

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China sdutcm.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 December 2021
Citations: 6
Academic Editor: Yanting Song

Abstract

Qi-Fu-Yin, a traditional Chinese medicine formula, has been used to treat Alzheimer’s disease (AD, a neurodegenerative disorder) in clinical setting. In this study, the chemical components of Qi-Fu-Yin and its prototype components and metabolites in rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, after oral administration, were preliminarily characterized via ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS). A total of 180 compounds, including saponins, flavonoids, organic acids, sucrose esters, oligosaccharide esters, phthalides, phenylethanoid glycosides, alkaloids, xanthones, terpene lactones, ionones, and iridoid glycoside, were tentatively characterized. For the first time, 51 prototypical components and 26 metabolites, including saponins, phthalides, flavonoids, sucrose esters, organic acids, alkaloids, ionones, terpene lactones, iridoid glycoside, and their derivatives, have been tentatively identified in the plasma. Furthermore, 10 prototypical components (including butylidenephthalide, butylphthalide, 20(S)-ginsenoside Rh1, 20(R)-ginsenoside Rh1, and zingibroside R1) and 6 metabolites were preliminarily characterized in cerebrospinal fluid. These results were beneficial to the discovery of the active components of Qi-Fu-Yin anti-AD.

1. Introduction

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plays a vital role in the treatment of various complex chronic diseases owing to the synergistic effects of the formulations and has, accordingly, garnered increasing attention worldwide [1, 2]. Qi-Fu-Yin, a TCM prescription, was first recorded in the book Jingyue Encyclopedia written by Jingyue Zhang during the Ming Dynasty. It is composed of seven herbs—Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma (GRR), Rehmanniae Radix Preparata (RRP), Angelicae Sinensis Radix (ASR), Atractylodis Macrocephala Rhizoma Preparata (ARP), Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma Preparata cum Melle (GRP), Ziziphi Spinosae Semen (ZSS), and Polygalae Radix Preparata (PRP)—in a ratio of 6 : 9 : 9 : 5 : 3 : 6 : 5 [3]. Qi-Fu-Yin has shown significant effects on Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in clinical studies [4, 5]. Owing to its remarkable therapeutic effects and pharmacological activities, Qi-Fu-Yin has attracted the attention of various researchers. Previous studies showed that Qi-Fu-Yin improves the learning ability and memory of rats injected with advanced glycation end products [6, 7] or β-amyloid protein [8, 9]. Furthermore, 154 chemical components were unambiguously identified or tentatively characterized in Qi-Fu-Yin using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS) [10]. However, it remains unknown which components are absorbed into the plasma and brain after oral administration of Qi-Fu-Yin, which hinders the elucidation of its potentially bioactive constituents and the underlying action mechanisms.

AD is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the deposition of Aβ and the formation of neurofibrillary tangles in the brain [11]. The ingredients absorbed into blood and that reach a certain concentration can reportedly exert pharmacodynamic effects [12]. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) allows different components to reach the brain and prevents harmful substances from entering the brain. Drugs passing through the BBB can play important roles in brain diseases [13]. Some biotransformed metabolites possess substantial bioactivities and can act as active components [14]. Thus, it is essential to detect components absorbed into blood and elucidate their metabolic profile, which could reveal the pharmacologically active substances and provide potential resources for discovering new drugs from TCM. In this study, a three-step approach based on UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS was implemented to analyze the multicomponent metabolic profiles of Qi-Fu-Yin in rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. First, the Qi-Fu-Yin in vitro chemical component database was established by consulting literature on Qi-Fu-Yin and its seven constituent herbs. The components in vitro were identified by their corresponding MS/MS fragment ions in standard solutions and databases. Second, the database of the prototype components was established to characterize the prototypical components in rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid after oral administration of Qi-Fu-Yin. Under the same LC-MS conditions, the prototype components were identified by comparing the standard solutions, extracts, control, and administered biological samples in parallel. Finally, according to the metabolic pathway and secondary mass spectrometry data of prototype components reported in the literature, the metabolites of Qi-Fu-Yin in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were tentatively characterized (Figure 1).

Details are in the caption following the image
Research strategy for identifying the chemical components in Qi-Fu-Yin, in vitro and in vivo, via UPLC-Q-TOF-MS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

GRR, RRP, ASR, ARP, and GRP were purchased from Anxing Traditional Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd. (Anguo, China); ZSS and PRP were purchased from Juyaotang Co., Ltd. (Anguo, China); reference standards of ferulic acid, liquiritin, spinosin, acteoside, 3,6′-disinapoyl sucrose, ginsenoside Rg1 (G-Rg1), ginsenoside Re (G-Re), ginsenoside Rb1 (G-Rb1), tenuifolin, and glycyrrhizic acid were purchased from the National Institute for Food and Drug Control (Beijing, China). Acetonitrile and formic acid were of HPLC grade (Fisher, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Deionized water was prepared using a Milli-Q purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Sodium formate was purchased from Waters (Milford, MA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Samples of Qi-Fu-Yin and the Seven Herbs

Qi-Fu-Yin was prepared in the laboratory according to the prescribed protocol [3]. Dried pieces of GRR, RRP, ASR, ARP, GRP, ZSS (crushed), and PRP were accurately weighed and immersed in 9 times amount of water for 30 min; then, the samples were serially decocted with 9 times and 7 times amount of water. After mixing and filtering, the extracts were concentrated to a small volume and lyophilized. An appropriate amount of the lyophilized powder was accurately weighed, dissolved in ultrapure water (equivalent to 50 mg crude drug per mL) in a 25 mL volumetric flask, and mixed evenly via ultrasonication for 30 min. Then, the extracts were centrifuged at 13000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min and filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane. The seven herb samples of Qi-Fu-Yin were prepared in the same manner as the prescribed method.

2.3. Animals and Drug Administration

Male SD rats, weighing 200 ± 20 g, were purchased from Beijing Wei Tong Li Hua Experimental Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All animal procedures were approved by the Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Institutional Animal Experimentation Committee (SDUTCM20210119001). All rats were housed at an ambient temperature of 20 ± 1°C with a 12 h light/dark cycle and fed a standard diet and water ad libitum for 3 days before the experiment. The rats were then divided into a control group (orally administered deionized water) and a Qi-Fu-Yin group (orally administered Qi-Fu-Yin) (n = 12). To detect the prototype components and metabolites of Qi-Fu-Yin in the rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, an 8-fold clinical dosage (1.72 g crude drug per mL, 10 mL per kg, twice daily) was selected as the oral dose [6, 7]. All groups received intragastric administration twice daily for three consecutive days. Before the experiments, the animals fasted for 12 h, with free access to water.

2.4. Biological Sample Collection and Preparation

After the last intragastric administration, 500 μL aliquots of serial blood samples were collected from the postorbital venous plexus vein of each rat at 0.5, 1.0, 2, and 4 h. Then, approximately 100 μL of cerebrospinal fluid from each rat was collected at 4 h via percutaneous puncture of the cerebellar medulla cistern [15]. The biological samples collected in heparinized polythene tubes were centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was transferred into new tubes and immediately stored at −80°C before preliminary treatment.

After unfreezing the biological samples in an ice-water mixture, plasma or cerebrospinal fluid was mixed at four different times to enrich the biological samples of each group. To each tube containing 1 mL of plasma or cerebrospinal fluid, 4 mL of methanol was added. The mixture was then vortexed for 2 min and centrifuged at 13000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was transferred to another tube and dried using sanitary nitrogen gas at room temperature. Then, the residue was redissolved in 100 μL of 30% methanol, vortexed for 2 min, and centrifuged at 13000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min.

2.5. UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS Analysis

An ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography system (ACQUITY H-Class, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled with a Q-TOF (Impact II, Bruker, Bremen, Germany) high-definition mass spectrometer in electrospray ionization mode was used for the chromatographic and mass spectral analyses of all samples. An AMT Halo-C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 2.7 μm) with a column temperature of 30°C was selected as the separation system. The mobile phase consisted of eluent A (0.1% formic acid in water, v/v) and eluent B (acetonitrile), with a flow rate of 0.30 mL/min. These phases were delivered using a gradient program as follows: 8% B from 0 to 5 min, 8–17% from 5 to 15 min, 17–23% B from 15 to 27 min, 23–35% B from 27 to 43 min, 35–70% B from 43 to 51 min, 70–100% B from 51 to 55 min, and 100% B from 55 to 60 min.

The mass spectra operating parameters were set as follows: capillary voltage of 3.5 kV (ESI+) or −3.0 kV (ESI−), source temperature of 220°C, drying temperature of 220°C, and drying gas flow of 8 L/min. The collision energy was set to range from to 35–75 V for MS/MS acquisition. To ensure mass accuracy and reproducibility, the mass spectrometer was calibrated over a range of 50–1500 Da using a sodium formate solution. All data were processed using Compass Data AnalysisTM (V4.4, Bruker, Bremen, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. In Vitro Chemical Characterization of Qi-Fu-Yin

The base peak chromatograms (BPCs) of Qi-Fu-Yin in the positive and negative ion modes are shown in Figure S1. A total of 180 compounds, including 59 triterpene saponins, 26 flavonoids, 17 organic acids, 16 sucrose esters, 14 oligosaccharide esters, 13 phthalides, 12 phenylethanoid glycosides, 9 alkaloids, 6 xanthones, 3 terpene lactones, 3 ionones, and 2 iridoid glycosides (Table 1), were identified. Twelve compounds were unambiguously identified via comparison with the standard solutions. The structures of other compounds were tentatively characterized based on their retention times, fragmentation pathways, and MS/MS spectra, by referring to the literature.

Table 1. Characterization of chemical components in Qi-Fu-Yin.
No. tR (min) Name Classification Formula Theoretical mass (Da) Measured mass (Da) Error (ppm) Precursor ions Main MS/MS fragment ions Source Ref.
1 0.99 Citric acid Organic acids C6H8O7 191.0197 191.0201 2.1 [M − H] 129.0196, 111.009 ZSS, ASR, ARP [16]
2 1.37 Geniposidic acid Iridoid glycoside C16H22O10 373.1140 373.1143 0.8 [M − H] 211.0605, 193.0497, 167.0703, 149.0595, 123.0437 RRP [10]
3 1.85 Decaffeoylacteoside Phenylethanoid glycosides C20H30O12 461.1664 461.1669 1.1 [M − H] 375.1314, 315.1314, 297.0980, 135.0452 RRP [17]
4 1.95 Mussaenosidic acid Iridoid glycoside C16H24O10 375.1297 375.1299 0.5 [M − H] 213.0778, 169.0873, 151.0766 RRP [18]
5 2.05 5-Caffeoylquinic acid Organic acids C16H18O9 353.0878 353.0878 0.0 [M − H] 191.0563, 179.0352, 161.0245, 155.0350, 111.0088 ASR [19]
6 2.34 3-Caffeoylquinic amide  Organic acids C16H19NO8 354.1183 354.1178 −1.5 [M + H]+ 192.0650, 174.0545, 146.0597 [10]
7 2.82 Ferulic acid hexoside Organic acids C16H20O9 355.1035 355.1042 2.0 [M − H] 193.0509, 149.0610, 178.0271, 134.0375 ASR [20]
8 3.01 3-Caffeoylquinic amide isomer  Organic acids C16H19NO8 354.1183 354.1177 −1.8 [M + H]+ 192.0650, 174.0545, 146.0597 [10]
9 3.03 Hydroxybenzoic acid Organic acids C7H6O3 137.0244 137.0244 0.0 [M − H] 136.0170, 108.0215 ZSS [16]
10 3.21 p-Hydroxybenzyl malonic acid Organic acids C10H10O5 209.0455 209.0456 0.5 [M − H] 419.0982, 165.0562, 121.0662 GRP [21]
11 3.34 Sanjoinine IB Alkaloids C19H21NO4 328.1543 328.1534 −2.7 [M + H]+ 265.0855, 251.0665, 237.0902, 223.0712 ZSS [22]
12 3.53 Magnocurarine Alkaloids C19H24NO3+ 314.1751 314.1748 −1.0 [M]+ 269.1179, 237.0897, 209.0947, 175.0744, 107.0491 ZSS [22]
13 3.69 Chlorogenic acid Organic acids C16H18O9 353.0878 353.0885 2.0 [M − H] 191.0563, 127.0404 ASR [20]
14 4.26 Sibiricose A5 Sucrose esters C22H30O14 517.1563 517.1568 1.0 [M − H] 341.1097, 193.0512, 175.0404, 160.0169 PRP [23]
15 4.55 4-Caffeoylquinic acid Organic acids C16H18O9 353.0878 353.0883 1.4 [M − H] 191.0562, 179.0350, 173.0457, 161.0243, 111.0453, 93.0346 ASR [10]
16 4.74 Vanillic acid Organic acids C8H8O4 167.0350 167.0351 0.6 [M − H] 123.0452 ASR [24]
17 5.32 Sibiricose A6 Sucrose esters C23H32O15 547.1668 547.1678 1.8 [M − H] 367.1034, 341.1094, 223.0616, 205.0508, 190.0274 PRP [25, 26]
18 5.54 Sanjoinine K Alkaloids C17H19NO3 286.1438 286.1431 −2.3 [M + H]+ 269.1154, 237.0905, 175.0751, 107.0492 ZSS [16]
19 5.90 Ferulic acid hexoside isomer Organic acids C16H20O9 355.1035 355.1041 1.7 [M − H] 193.0512, 149.0610, 178.0273, 134.0376 ASR [20]
20 5.99 Darendoside B Phenylethanoid glycosides C21H32O12 475.1821 475.1830 1.9 [M − H] 329.1228, 311.1144, 161.0459, 113.0247 RRP [27]
21 6.18 Liquiritigenin-7,4′-di-O-glucoside Flavonoids C27H32O14 579.1719 579.1733 2.4 [M − H] 417.1212, 255.0669, 135.0086 GRP [28]
22 6.38 Caffeic acid Organic acids C9H8O4 179.0350 179.0352 1.1 [M − H] 151.0459, 135.0499 ASR [10]
23 7.47 Magnoflorine Alkaloids C20H23NO4+ 342.1700 342.1689 −3.2 [M + H]+ 297.1113, 282.0876, 265.0848 ZSS [16]
24 9.46 Feruoylquinic acid Organic acids C17H20O9 367.1035 367.1043 2.2 [M − H] 191.0563, 173.0461, 111.0453, 93.035 ASR [20]
25 9.82 Lotusine Alkaloids C19H24NO3+ 314.1751 314.1752 0.3 [M]+ 269.1162, 237.0912, 209.0949, 107.0485 ZSS [22]
26 9.94 Feruoylquinic acid isomer Organic acids C17H20O9 367.1035 367.1034 −0.3 [M − H] 191.0564, 173.0457, 111.0450, 93.0347 ASR [20]
27 10.04 Sibiricose A1 Sucrose esters C23H32O15 547.1668 547.1676 1.5 [M − H] 367.1040, 223.016, 190.0275 PRP [10, 23]
28 10.23 Vicenin II Flavonoids C27H30O15 593.1512 593.1522 1.7 [M − H] 503.1200, 473.1098, 383.0780, 353.0674, 325.0931, GRP, ZSS [16, 22]
29 10.43 Ferulic acid isomer  Organic acids C10H10O4 193.0506 193.0506 0.0 [M − H] 149.0243, 121.0298
30 10.81 Lancerin Xanthones C19H18O10 405.0827 405.0833 1.5 [M − H] 285.0410, 257.0456 PRP [23]
31 11.30 Rehmaionoside A/B Ionones C19H34O8 435.2239 435.2246 1.6 [M + COOH] 389.2223, 179.0591 RRP [10, 17]
32 11.49 Ferulic acid Organic acids C10H10O4 193.0506 193.0507 0.5 [M − H] 178.0272, 149.0609, 134.0369 ASR [20]
33 11.97 Lancerin isomer Xanthones C19H18O10 405.0827 405.0833 1.5 [M − H] 285.0413, 315.0518, 257.0458 PRP [10]
34 12.14 Caaverine Alkaloids C17H17NO2 268.1332 268.1321 −4.1 [M − H] 251.1014, 219.0829, 209.0933, 191.0862 ZSS [22]
35 12.45 Sibiricaxanthone A/B Xanthones C24H26O14 537.1250 537.1258 1.5 [M − H] 405.0832, 387.0730, 327.0524, 315.0514, 297.0412, 285.0410, 267.0303, 243.0302 PRP [29]
36 12.45 Echinacoside Phenylethanoid glycosides C35H46O20 785.2510 785.2520 1.3 [M − H] 623.2201, 461.1663, 161.0245 RRP [30]
37 12.74 Schaftoside Flavonoids C26H28O14 563.1406 563.1408 0.4 [M − H] 353.0674, 443.0992, 473.1098, 383.0778, 503.1197, 425.0877, 413.0882 GRP [31]
38 13.12 Sibiricose A2 Sucrose esters C24H34O15 561.1825 561.1832 1.2 [M − H] 607.1888, 323.0991, 237.0771 PRP [10]
39 13.41 Rehmaionoside A/B Ionones C19H34O8 435.2239 435.2239 0.0 [M + COOH] 389.2223, 179.0572 RRP [29]
40 13.79 Liquiritin Flavonoids C21H22O9 417.1191 417.1194 0.7 [M − H] 255.0665, 135.0089, 119.0504 GRP [31]
41 14.08 Polygalaxanthone III Xanthones C25H28O15 567.1355 567.1361 1.1 [M − H] 447.0945, 435.0932, 417.0839, 357.0621, 345.0620, 327.0518, 315.0515, 297.0408 PRP [10]
42 14.27 Jionoside E Phenylethanoid glycosides C35H46O19 769.2561 769.2568 0.9 [M − H] 623.2197, 605.2092, 549.1662, 427.1069, 323.0996, 179.0561 RRP [27]
43 14.37 Liquiritin apioside Flavonoids C26H30O13 549.1614 549.1616 0.4 [M − H] 255.06581, 135.00719, 119.04859, 417.11804 GRP [31]
45 14.47 Asimilobine Alkaloids C17H17NO2 268.1332 268.1324 −3.0 [M − H] 251.1064, 219.0809, 201.0722, 191.0858, 179.0855 ZSS [22]
44 14.47 Polygalaxanthone XI Xanthones C25H28O15 567.1355 567.1366 1.9 [M − H] 345.0619, 315.0511 PRP [32]
46 14.56 Jionoside A1/jionoside A2 Phenylethanoid glycosides C36H48O20 799.2666 799.2672 0.8 [M − H] 623.2199, 605.2092, 461.1663, 315.1110, 193.0509, 175.0403 RRP [30]
47 14.85 Spinosin Flavonoids C28H32O15 607.1668 607.1674 1.0 [M − H] 487.1252, 445.1144, 427.1039, 367.0823, 337.0722, 307.0614 ZSS [16]
48 15.33 Swertisin Flavonoids C22H22O10 445.1140 445.1147 1.6 [M − H] 355.0839, 325.0721, 297.0409 ZSS [16]
49 15.33 Isoviolanthin/violanthin Flavonoids C27H30O14 577.1563 577.1572 1.6 [M − H] 383.0777, 353.0670, 413.08783, 457.1145, 487.1248 GRP [31]
50 15.43 Tenuifoliside B Sucrose esters C30H36O17 667.1880 667.1894 2.1 [M − H] 461.1312, 205.0510, 190.0274, 137.0247, 281.0674 PRP [23]
51 15.52 Sibiricose A4 Sucrose esters C34H42O19 753.2248 753.2254 0.8 [M − H] 547.1678, 529.1574, 461.1306, 367.1041, 223.0615, 205.0509, 190.0274 PRP [29]
52 15.71 Tenuifoliside 638 Sucrose esters C29H34O16 637.1774 637.1773 −0.2 [M − H] 461.1309, 443.1208, 175.0402 PRP [29]
53 16.48 Acteoside Phenylethanoid glycosides C29H36O15 623.1981 623.1989 1.3 [M − H] 461.1667, 443.1555, 315.1083, 179.0349, 161.0243 RRP [30]
54 17.06 6′′′-Vanilloylspinosin Flavonoids C36H38O18 757.1985 757.1993 1.1 [M − H] 637.1556, 607.1694, 445.1143, 427.1038, 367.0827, 307.0621 ZSS [22]
55 17.25 Senkyunolide I Phthalides C12H16O4 207.1015 207.1009 −2.9 [M + H–H2O]+ 189.0822, 161.0906, 147.0752 ASR [33]
56 17.44 Jionoside B1/Jionoside B2 Phenylethanoid glycosides C37H50O20 813.2823 813.2834 1.4 [M − H] 637.2359, 619.2254, 491.1780, 193.0507, 175.0402, 160.0167 RRP [16]
57 17.63 6′′′-P-Hydroxyl-benzoyspinosin Flavonoids C35H36O17 727.1880 727.1879 −0.1 [M − H] 607.1616, 445.1149, 427.1038, 325.0719, 307.0617 ZSS [16]
58 17.73 Isoacteoside Phenylethanoid glycosides C29H36O15 623.1981 623.1990 1.4 [M − H] 461.1670, 477.1405, 315.1096, 179.0351, 161.0245 RRP [30]
59 18.69 Tenuifoliside A isomer Sucrose esters C31H38O17 681.2036 681.2044 1.2 [M − H] 443.1208, 281.0672, 237.0774, 223.0616, 205.0510, 137.0246 PRP [23]
60 18.78 Senkyunolide H Phthalides C12H16O4 207.1015 207.1008 −3.4 [M + H–H2O]+ 189.0812, 161.0938, 147.0689 ASR [33]
61 18.98 3,6′-Disinapoyl sucrose Sucrose esters C34H42O19 753.2248 753.2249 0.1 [M − H] 547.1670, 529.1568, 367.1038, 265.0720, 223.0612, 205.0506, 190.0271 PRP [10]
62 19.02 Nornuciferine Alkaloids C18H19NO2 282.1489 282.1481 −2.7 [M + H]+ 265.1214, 250.0979, 121.0280 ZSS [22]
63 19.05 6′′′-Sinapoyl spinosin Flavonoids C39H42O19 815.2393 815.2379 −1.7 [M + H]+ 429.1181, 411.1037, 369.1162, 327.0855, 207.0647, 351.0833, 297.0750, 175.0385 ZSS [16]
64 19.21 6′′′-Dihydrophaseoylspinosin Flavonoids C43H52O19 873.3176 873.3158 −2.0 [M + H]+ 855.2986, 447.1263, 429.1140, 411.1057, 393.0969, 381.0947, 351.0846, 327.0854, 297.0752, 247.1321 ZSS [22]
65 19.56 3,4,5-Trimethoxycinnamic acid☆ Organic acids C12H14O5 237.0768 237.0770 0.8 [M − H] 193.0873, 108.0215 PRP [34]
66 19.60 6′′′-p-Coumaroyl spinosin Flavonoids C37H38O17 755.2182 755.2166 −2.1 [M + H]+ 429.1170, 411.1080, 351.0850, 327.0854, 147.0438, 635.1770, 381.0957, 297.0750 ZSS [16]
67 19.66 Jionoside D Phenylethanoid glycosides C30H38O15 637.2138 637.2137 −0.2 [M − H] 161.0242, 461.1660, 267.0660, 175.0401 RRP [10]
68 19.66 Arillanin A Sucrose esters C33H40O18 723.2142 723.2149 1.0 [M − H] 547.1679, 265.0722, 223.0617, 205.0510, 175.0404, 160.0170 PRP [32]
69 19.73 6′′′-Feruloyl spinosin Flavonoids C38H40O18 785.2287 785.2263 −3.1 [M + H]+ 665.1891, 447.1275, 429.1168, 411.1068, 393.0957, 351.0852, 327.0853, 297.0750, 177.0542 ZSS [10]
70 19.95 Tenuifoliside 652 Sucrose esters C30H36O16 651.1931 651.1942 1.7 [M − H] 443.1199, 281.0671, 207.0668, 175.0403, 137.0244 PRP [29]
71 20.81 Ononin Flavonoids C22H22O9 475.1246 475.1249 0.6 [M + COOH] 475.1249, 267.0664, 252.0429 GRP [31]
72 21.00 Tenuifoliside 652 isomer Sucrose esters C30H36O16 651.1931 651.1941 1.5 [M − H] 443.1199, 205.0509, 190.0272, 175.0033, 121.0297 PRP [29]
73 21.10 Isoliquiritin apioside Flavonoids C26H30O13 549.1614 549.1620 1.1 [M − H] 255.0667, 135.0090, 119.0505, 417.1200 GRP [10]
74 21.48 Isoliquiritin Flavonoids C21H22O9 417.1191 417.1197 1.4 [M − H] 255.0666, 135.0089, 119.0404 GRP [10]
75 21.77 Leucosceptoside A Phenylethanoid glycosides C30H38O15 637.2138 637.2129 −1.4 [M − H] 461.1661, 175.0400, 265.0722, 161.0239 RRP [30]
76 21.77 Tenuifoliside A Sucrose esters C31H38O17 681.2036 681.2038 0.3 [M − H] 443.1203, 281.0671, 239.0564, 179.0352, 137.0245 PRP [10]
77 22.06 Liquiritigenin Flavonoids C15H12O4 255.0663 255.0665 0.8 [M − H] 135.0086, 119.0502 GRP [31]
78 22.64 Neoisoliquiritin Flavonoids C21H22O9 417.1191 417.1197 1.4 [M − H] 255.0667, 135.0089, 119.0505 GRP [28]
79 22.64 Notoginsenoside R1 Saponins C47H80O18 977.5327 977.5334 0.7 [M + COOH] 931.5284, 637.4332, 475.3809 GRR [35]
80 22.83 6′′′-(-)-Phaseoylspinosin Flavonoids C43H50O19 869.2874 869.2884 1.2 [M − H] 839.2765, 607.1683, 589.1575, 427.1045 ZSS [22]
81 23.70 Tenuifoliose G Oligosaccharide esters C66H84O38 1483.4568 1483.4582 0.9 [M − H] 1337.39795, 1295.38232, 1161.35095, 1119.34119, 997.30548, 851.27283, 753.22705, 631.18640, 452.31161, 307.08231, 175.03891, 163.03868, 145.02803 PRP [10]
82 23.80 Senkyunolide D Phthalides C12H14O4 221.0819 221.0820 0.5 [M − H] 177.0921, 147.0450 ASR [36]
83 23.80 Tenuifoliose M Oligosaccharide esters C65H82O37 1453.4462 1453.4490 1.9 [M − H] 1307.3873, 1161.3532, 997.3064, 835.2514, 307.0824, 163.0385, 145.0280 PRP [10]
84 24.48 Ginsenoside Rg1 Saponins C42H72O14 845.4904 845.4912 0.9 [M + COOH] 799.4877, 637.4342, 475.3809, 161.0458, 179.0565 GRR [31]
85 24.67 Licorice glycoside B Flavonoids C35H36O15 695.1981 695.1991 1.4 [M − H] 549.1634, 163.0409, 417.1202, 255.0665, 399.1099, 531.1523, 175.0403 GRP [31]
86 24.77 Isomartynoside Phenylethanoid glycosides C31H40O15 651.2294 651.2303 1.4 [M − H] 505.1703, 475.1826, 193.0511, 175.0403, 160.017, 113.0245 RRP [37]
87 24.77 Licorice glycoside A Flavonoids C36H38O16 725.2087 725.2095 1.1 [M − H] 549.1639, 255.0668, 193.0508, 135.0086 GRP [38]
88 24.86 Ginsenoside Re Saponins C48H82O18 991.5483 991.5501 1.8 [M + COOH] 945.5442, 783.4916, 637.4329, 475.3793, 179.0562, 161.0457 GRR [31]
89 26.11 Senkyunolide D isomer Phthalides C12H14O4 221.0819 221.0817 −0.9 [M − H] 177.0920, 147.0453 ASR [36]
90 26.31 Tenuifoliside C Sucrose esters C35H44O19 767.2404 767.2416 1.6 [M − H] 529.1567, 367.1038, 237.077, 223.0613, 205.0507, 190.0271 PRP [10]
91 26.69 Tenuifoliose T Oligosaccharide esters C56H70O32 1253.3777 1253.3792 1.2 [M − H] 1223.3637, 1077.3279, 955.2908, 647.1988, 451.1232, 307.0810, 287.0549, 257.0444 PRP [23]
92 26.88 Martynoside Phenylethanoid glycosides C31H40O15 651.2294 651.2299 0.8 [M − H] 505.172, 475.1829, 193.0508, 175.0403, 160.0169, 113.0244 RRP [17]
93 26.90 (hydroxy benzoyl)-(hydroxy cinnamoyl)-trihydroxyphenyl sucrose Sucrose esters C34H42O18 783.2353 783.2365 1.5 [M + COOH] 737.2325, 615.1934, 467.1415, 323.0980, 179.0547, 161.0458, 147.0453, 121.0296 PRP [10]
94 27.75 Tenuifoliose L Oligosaccharide esters C67H84O38 1495.4569 1495.4569 0.0 [M − H] 1349.3923, 1307.3988, 163.0410, 145.0294 PRP [10]
95 28.14 Tenuifoliose K Oligosaccharide esters C57H70O32 1265.3777 1265.3801 1.9 [M − H] 1119.3395, 1077.3346, 997.3037, 163.0403, 145.0294 PRP [10]
96 29.00 Tenuifoliose C Oligosaccharide esters C58H72O33 1295.3883 1295.3903 1.5 [M − H] 1173.3653, 1119.3401, 1077.3265, 997.3061, 145.0296, 175.0404 PRP [10]
97 29.78 Amphibine D Alkaloids C36H49N5O5 632.3806 632.3805 −0.2 [M + H]+ 289.1874, 148.1111 ZSS [16]
98 30.35 Desacylsenegasaponin B Saponins C57H70O32 1265.5808 1265.5831 1.8 [M − H] 455.3179, 425.3077 PRP [29]
99 30.44 Uralsaponin C Saponins C42H64O16 823.4122 823.4133 1.3 [M − H] 647.3829, 351.0580, 193.0357 GRP [28]
100 30.44 Tenuifoliose I Oligosaccharide esters C59H72O33 1307.3883 1307.3904 1.6 [M − H] 1161.3529, 1119.3479, 1101.3331, 997.3023, 631.1891, 163.0400, 145.0299 PRP [10]
101 30.70 Aeginetic acid Ionones C15H24O4 267.1602 267.1610 3.0 [M − H] 223.1780, 205.1615, 178.9208, 153.0924 RRP [39]
102 30.81 Methoxyl benzoyl-trimethoxyl cinnamoyl sucrose Sucrose esters C32H40O17 741.2248 741.2255 0.9 [M + COOH] 237.0773, 151.0402 PRP [10]
103 31.12 Tenuifoliose D Oligosaccharide esters C60H74O34 1337.3989 1337.4007 1.3 [M − H] 1161.3546, 1119.3412, 1039.3161, 997.3030, 175.0404 PRP [10]
104 31.41 Notoginsenoside R2 Saponins C41H70O13 815.4834 815.4834 0.0 [M + COOH] 769.4745, 637.4342, 475.3791, 161.0462 GRR [40]
105 31.41 Tenuifoliose E Oligosaccharide esters C58H72O33 1295.3883 1295.3933 3.9 [M − H] 1173.3506, 1119.3442, 795.2398, 175.0404, 145.0300 PRP [29]
106 31.79 Polygalasaponin XXIII Saponins C53H82O24 1101.5123 1101.5164 3.7 [M − H] 423.2925, 453.3029 PRP [29]
107 32.08 Polygalasaponin XXVIII Saponins C53H84O24 1103.5380 1103.5328 −4.7 [M − H] 455.3185, 425.3075 PRP [23]
108 32.28 24-Hydroxyl-licorice-saponin A3 Saponins C48H72O22 999.4442 999.4488 4.6 [M − H] 837.3942, 351.0584, 193.0359 GRP [10]
109 32.57 Tenuifoliose J Oligosaccharide esters C59H72O33 1307.3883 1307.3898 1.1 [M − H] 1161.3549, 1039.3096, 163.0408, 145.0304 PRP [29, 32]
110 32.81 Butylidenephthalide Phthalides C12H12O2 189.0910 189.0904 −3.2 [M + H]+ 171.0799, 161.0954, 143.0852, 117.0694 ASR [20]
111 32.85 Senkyunolide F Phthalides C12H14O3 205.0870 205.0880 4.9 [M − H] 161.0975 ASR [20]
112 32.92 Uralsaponin F Saponins C44H64O19 895.3969 895.3995 2.9 [M − H] 719.3703, 351.0586, 193.0363 GRP [31]
113 32.95 Onjisaponin TF Saponins C59H94O28 1249.5859 1249.5880 1.7 [M − H] 1025.5362, 455.3185, 425.3077 PRP [23]
114 33.05 Licorice saponin H2/K2 Saponins C42H62O16 821.3965 821.3981 1.9 [M − H] 351.0583, 193.0364, 175.0255 GRP [28, 41]
115 33.05 22-Hydroxyl-licorice-saponin G2 Saponins C42H62O18 853.3863 853.3882 2.2 [M − H] 677.3568, 351.0583, 193.0365 GRP [28]
116 33.22 Butylphthalide Phthalides C12H14O2 191.1067 191.1062 −2.6 [M + H]+ 173.0959, 155.0842, 145.1008, 117.0698 ASR [20]
117 33.34 Tenuifoliose B Oligosaccharide esters C60H74O34 1337.3989 1337.4027 2.8 [M − H] 1161.3551, 1119.342, 1101.3324, 1039.3156, 175.0410, 145.0306 PRP [10]
118 33.92 Ginsenoside Rf Saponins C42H72O14 845.4904 845.4928 2.8 [M + COOH] 799.4880, 637.4349, 475.3820, 179.0574, 161.0466 GRR [35]
119 33.92 Tenuifoliose H Oligosaccharide esters C61H74O34 1349.3989 1349.4019 2.2 [M − H] 1307.3907, 1161.3503, 731.2194, 145.0304 PRP [10]
120 34.40 Senkyunolide A Phthalides C12H16O2 193.1223 193.1218 −2.6 [M + H]+ 147.1170, 175.1113, 137.0593 ASR [20]
121 34.59 Tenuifoliose A Oligosaccharide esters C62H76O35 1379.4094 1379.4131 2.7 [M − H] 1203.3649, 1161.3529, 175.041, 145.0303 PRP [10]
122 35.08 Tenuifoliose N Oligosaccharide esters C63H78O36 1409.4200 1409.4234 2.4 [M − H] 1233.3879, 175.0410 PRP [23]
123 35.37 Ginsenoside F5 Saponins C41H70O13 815.4834 815.4821 −1.6 [M + COOH] 769.4765, 637.4337, 475.3807 GRR [42]
124 35.41 Licorice saponin A3 Saponins C48H72O21 983.4493 983.4518 2.5 [M − H] 821.3988, 645.3687, 351.0584, 193.0366 GRP [31]
125 35.79 24-Hydroxyl-licorice-saponin E2 Saponins C42H60O17 835.3793 835.3785 −1.0 [M − H] 659.3446, 351.0582, 193.0362 GRP [28]
126 35.84 Isoliquiritigenin  Flavonoids C15H12O4 255.0663 255.0674 4.3 [M − H] 135.0094, 119.0510 [28]
127 36.04 Formononetin  Flavonoids C16H12O4 267.0663 267.0671 3.0 [M − H] 252.0458, 195.0458 [31]
128 36.32 Senkyunolide F isomer Phthalides C12H14O3 205.0870 205.0879 4.4 [M − H] 161.0993 ASR [20]
129 36.42 22β-Acetoxyl-glycyrrhizin Saponins C44H64O18 879.4020 879.4034 1.6 [M − H] 351.0583, 193.0362 GRP [31]
130 36.61 Tenuifolin Saponins C36H56O12 679.3699 679.3718 2.8 [M − H] 455.3180, 425.3074 PRP [10]
131 36.71 Ginsenoside F3☆ Saponins C41H70O13 815.4834 815.4818 −2.0 [M + COOH] 769.4761, 637.4332, 475.3810, 161.0463 GRR [42]
132 36.90 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rh1 Saponins C36H62O9 683.4376 683.4390 2.0 [M + COOH] 637.4335, 475.3806, 161.0462 GRR [10]
133 36.90 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rg2 Saponins C42H72O13 829.4955 829.4969 1.7 [M + COOH] 783.4911, 637.4334, 475.3807, 161.0461 GRR [35]
134 36.90 22-Hydroxyl-glycyrrhizin Saponins C42H62O17 837.3914 837.3929 1.8 [M − H] 661.3603, 485.3294, 351.0583, 193.0362 GRP [28]
135 37.35 Senkyunolide A isomer☆ Phthalides C12H16O2 193.1223 193.1217 −3.1 [M + H]+ 147.1163, 175.1113, 137.0594 ASR [20]
136 37.39 20(R)-Ginsenoside Rg2 Saponins C42H72O13 829.4955 829.4972 2.0 [M + COOH] 783.4913, 637.4332, 475.3808, 161.0462 GRR [42]
137 37.68 20(R)-Ginsenoside Rh1 Saponins C36H62O9 683.4376 683.4393 2.5 [M + COOH] 637.4336, 475.3807, 161.0463 GRR [40]
138 37.89 Jujuboside A Saponins C58H94O26 1251.6015 1251.6036 1.7 [M + COOH] 1205.5983, 1073.5549, 749.4461, 455.1431, 179.0564, 161.0463 ZSS [16]
139 38.73 Ginsenoside Rb1 Saponins C54H92O23 1153.6011 1153.6033 1.9 [M + COOH] 1107.5962, 945.5427, 783.4889, 621.4396, 459.3908 GRR [31]
140 39.41 Licorice saponin E2 Saponins C42H60O16 819.3809 819.3819 1.2 [M − H] 645.3648, 351.0581, 193.0362 GRP [28]
141 39.70 Ginsenoside Ro Saponins C48H76O19 955.4908 955.4918 1.0 [M − H] 793.4382, 775.4275, 749.451, 731.4392, 523.3806, 455.3537, 613.3755, 569.3857, 179.0569, 119.0355 GRR [31]
142 39.70 Ginsenoside Rc Saponins C53H90O22 1123.5906 1123.5918 1.1 [M + COOH] 1077.5854, 915.5348, 459.3809, 149.0451, 191.0563 GRR [35]
143 39.79 Licorice saponin G2 Saponins C42H62O17 837.3914 837.3921 0.8 [M − H] 775.3927, 661.3593, 485.3277, 351.0576, 193.0359 GRP [28]
144 40.75 Ginsenoside Rb2 Saponins C53H90O22 1123.5906 1123.5908 0.2 [M + COOH] 1077.5865, 783.4945, 621.4307, 459.3789 GRR [35]
145 41.14 Ginsenoside Rb3 Saponins C53H90O22 1123.5906 1123.5907 0.1 [M + COOH] 1077.5871, 783.4955, 621.4311, 459.3792 GRR [43]
146 41.33 Rhaoglycyrrhizin Saponins C48H72O20 967.4544 967.4567 2.4 [M − H] 497.1159, 321.0841, 339.0941 GRP [10]
147 41.33 Jujuboside B Saponins C52H84O21 1045.5578 1045.5582 0.4 [M + H]+ 733.4491, 587.39348, 533.3637, 455.3536, 437.3432, 369.2802 ZSS [16]
148 42.59 Chikusetsusaponin IVa Saponins C42H66O14 793.4380 793.4389 1.1 [M − H] 631.3854, 455.3525, 569.3834 GRR [31]
149 42.68 Ginsenoside Rd Saponins C48H82O18 991.5483 991.5496 1.3 [M + COOH] 945.5438, 783.4892, 621.438, 459.3857, 179.0563, 161.0457 GRR [35]
150 42.78 Glycyrrhizic acid Saponins C42H62O16 821.3965 821.3972 0.9 [M − H] 759.3961, 645.3648, 469.3324, 351.0572, 193.0356 GRP [31]
151 43.19 Senkyunolide A isomer Phthalides C12H16O2 193.1223 193.1220 −1.6 [M + H]+ 147.1166, 175.1117, 137.0599 ASR [20]
152 44.03 6,8-Dihydroxy-1,2,4-trimethoxyxanthone  Xanthones C16H14O7 317.0667 317.0675 2.5 [M − H] 302.0444, 287.0203, 259.0254, 231.0297 [23]
153 44.61 Licorice saponin B2☆ Saponins C42H64O15 807.4172 807.4178 0.7 [M − H] 631.3870, 351.0572, 193.0356 GRP [31]
154 44.62 Atractylenolide I Terpene lactones C15H18O2 231.1379 231.1373 −2.6 [M + H]+ 213.1266, 203.1427, 189.0913, 185.1314, 157.1007 ARP [10]
155 44.70 Atractylenolide III Terpene lactones C15H20O3 249.1485 249.1485 −0.1 [M + H]+ 231.1405, 213.1207, 185.1277, 175.0688 ARP [10]
156 45.19 Uralsaponin B Saponins C42H62O16 821.3965 821.3972 0.9 [M − H] 759.3961, 645.3648, 469.3324, 351.0572, 193.0356 GRP [44]
157 46.15 Licorice saponin J2 Saponins C42H64O16 823.4122 823.4131 1.1 [M − H] 351.0573, 193.0357 GRP [41]
158 46.25 Ginsenoside Rg6 Saponins C42H70O12 811.4849 811.4852 0.4 [M + COOH] 765.4808, 619.4225, 205.0721, 161.0459 GRR [31]
159 46.25 Senegasaponin B Saponins C69H102O31 1425.6332 1425.6381 3.4 [M − H] 1395.6243, 1201.5864, 455.3163, 425.3061 PRP [29]
160 46.25 Onjisaponin Z Saponins C71H106O32 1469.6594 1469.6600 0.4 [M − H] 1245.6054, 1439.6517, 425.3061, 405.1400, 455.3165 PRP [29]
161 46.34 Onjisaponin E Saponins C71H106O33 1485.6544 1485.6545 0.1 [M − H] 455.3187, 425.3029 PRP [23]
162 46.53 Onjisaponin Y Saponins C69H102O30 1409.6383 1409.6376 −0.5 [M − H] 1379.6184, 1185.5881, 425.3062, 455.3166 PRP [29]
163 46.53 Onjisaponin G Saponins C70H104O32 1455.6438 1455.6447 0.6 [M − H] 1425.6341, 993.5078, 425.3062, 455.3166 PRP [23]
164 46.63 Ginsenoside Rg4 Saponins C42H70O12 811.4849 811.4854 0.6 [M + COOH] 765.4798, 619.4212, 161.0456 GRR [42]
165 46.82 Ginsenoside Rk3 Saponins C36H60O8 665.4270 665.4271 0.2 [M + COOH] 619.4211, 457.3698, 161.0458 GRR [31]
166 46.82 Licorice saponin C2 Saponins C42H62O15 805.4016 805.4020 0.5 [M − H] 645.3637, 351.0575, 193.0356 GRP [41]
167 46.92 Onjisaponin TH Saponins C65H96O28 1323.6015 1323.5991 −1.8 [M − H] 455.3171, 425.3048 PRP [23]
168 47.11 Ginsenoside Rh4 Saponins C36H60O8 665.4270 665.4277 1.1 [M + COOH] 619.4218, 457.3679, 161.0459 GRR [31]
169 47.40 Zingibroside R1 Saponins C42H66O14 793.4380 793.4386 0.8 [M − H] 731.4390, 631.3853, 613.3751, 569.3853, 455.3538 GRR [42]
170 47.88 Ginsenoside Rg3 Saponins C42H72O13 829.4955 829.4953 −0.2 [M + COOH] 783.4894, 621.4369, 459.3844, 161.0456 GRR [31]
171 48.10 E-Ligustilide Phthalides C12H14O2 191.1067 191.1060 −3.7 [M + H]+ 173.0959, 163.1111, 155.0845, 145.1010 ASR [20, 33]
172 48.17 Licochalcone A  Flavonoids C21H22O4 337.1445 337.1445 0.0 [M − H] 307.0978, 281.082, 243.104 [31]
173 48.56 Isoglycyrol  Flavonoids C21H18O6 365.1031 365.1029 −0.5 [M − H] 335.0561, 307.0248, 295.0251 [31]
174 49.13 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rs3  Saponins C44H74O14 871.5061 871.5056 −0.6 [M + COOH] 825.5012, 783.4903, 621.4387, 459.3845, 765.4792 [35]
175 49.26 Atractylenolide II Terpene lactones C15H20O2 233.1536 233.1532 −1.7 [M + H]+ 215.1431, 187.1473, 169.1047, 151.0747, 145.1009 ARP [10]
176 49.33 20(R)-Ginsenoside Rs3  Saponins C44H74O14 871.5061 871.5074 1.5 [M + COOH] 825.5021, 783.4910, 621.4384, 459.3875, 765.4807 [35]
177 49.39 Z-Ligustilide Phthalides C12H14O2 191.1067 191.1062 −2.6 [M + H]+ 173.0956, 163.1112, 155.0847, 145.1010 ASR [20, 33]
178 50.00 Ginsenoside Rk1  Saponins C42H70O12 811.4849 811.4850 0.1 [M + COOH] 765.4802, 603.4275, 161.0458 [31]
179 50.19 Ginsenoside Rg5  Saponins C42H70O12 811.4849 811.4856 0.9 [M + COOH] 765.4800, 603.4263, 161.0458 [40]
180 52.21 Glycyrrhetinic acid  Saponins C30H46O4 469.3323 469.3327 0.9 [M − H] 425.3406 [31]
  • Only detected in Qi-Fu-Yin prescription, not detected in herbs; detected in Qi-Fu-Yin prescription for the first time.

3.1.1. GRR

Triterpene saponins are the main components of GRR [45]. Ginsenosides can be divided into protopanaxatriol (PPT), protopanaxadiol (PPD), and oleanolic acid (OA) according to their mother skeleton. The diagnostic ions at m/z 475.38, 459.38, and 455.35 corresponded to the PPT, PPD, and OA-type aglycones, respectively. Some special PPT-type ginsenosides were detected at m/z 457.37 owing to dehydration between the 20(21) or 20(22) bonds (Table 1). Continuous or simultaneous loss of different types of glycosyl moieties is another characteristic fragment distribution of ginsenosides. The 132, 146, 162, and 176 Da values indicated the presence of an Ara or Xyl, Rha, Glc, and GlcA glycosyl moiety, respectively. Based on the fragmentation rules, 28 saponins were identified.

Compound 142 produced the adduct ion [M + COOH] (m/z 1123.5918) and deprotonated molecular ion [M − H] (m/z 1077.5854), indicating a molecular formula of C53H90O22. Diagnostic ions at m/z 915.5348, 783.4945, 621.4401, and 459.3809 revealed that it was a PPD-type ginsenoside with continuous or simultaneous elimination of Glc and Ara moieties. Thus, compound 142 was assigned to ginsenoside Rc (Table 1). Analogously, PPT-type compounds 79, 84, 88, 104, 118, 123, 131–133, 136, and 137 and PPD-type compounds 139, 142, 144, 145, 149, 170, 174, 176, 178, and 179 were also preliminarily characterized according to their fragmentation pathways and retention times (Table 1). Compounds 158, 164, 165, and 168 had characteristic fragments at m/z 457.37 and were characterized as special PPT-type ginsenosides (Table 1).

Compound 141 only produced a deprotonated molecular ion [M − H] and diagnostic ions at m/z 455.3527, which indicated that it was an OA-type ginsenoside. Fragmentation ions at m/z 793.4382, 731.4392, 613.3755, and 569.3857 indicated the continuous or simultaneous loss of Glc, GlcA, and CO2. Similarly, compounds 148 and 169 were tentatively assigned (Table 1).

3.1.2. RRP

Iridoid glycosides are considered the main components of RRP. The negative ion mode was selected to characterize the RRP components because the fragmentation pathway of glycosyl was easier to detect in the negative ion mode (Figure S1). According to the fragmentation rules, 12 phenylethanoid glycosides, 2 iridoid glycosides, 3 ionone glycosides, and 1 organic acid were identified.

The loss of acyl residues is a characteristic fragmentation pattern of phenylethanoid glycosides. Compound 53 produced a deprotonated molecular ion [M − H] (m/z 623.1989) in the negative ion mode, which indicated a molecular formula of C29H36O15. The detection of fragmentation ions at m/z 461.1667, 443.1555, and 315.1083 suggested the continuous neutral loss of caffeoyl, H2O, and Rha; therefore, compound 53 was identified as acteoside (Figure S2A). Compounds 86 and 92 produced deprotonated molecular ions [M − H] (m/z 651.23), indicating a molecular formula of C31H40O15. Fragmentation ions at m/z 505.17 and 475.18 corresponded to their neutral loss of Rha and feruloyl. Compounds 86 and 92 were identified as isomartynoside and martynoside, respectively, based on their retention times (Table 1). Other compounds were also preliminarily characterized according to MS1/MS2 data and retention times available in the literature.

3.1.3. ASR

Organic acids and phthalides are the primary components of ASR, and both can be detected in the positive as well as negative ion modes. The loss of acyl residues in the negative ion mode is characteristic of the fragmentation pattern of organic acids. Phthalides were easily detected by the loss of H2O and CO through ring opening in the positive ion mode. According to the fragmentation rules, 14 organic acids and 13 phthalides were identified.

Compound 5 produced a deprotonated molecular ion [M − H] (m/z 353.0878) in the negative ion mode, indicating a molecular formula of C16H18O9. Fragmentation ions at m/z 191.0563 and 161.0245 indicated the presence of caffeoyl, and the m/z values 155.0350 and 127.0400 indicated the continuous loss of CO and CO2. Compounds 13 and 15 were isomers of compound 5. Compounds 5, 13, and 15 were identified as 5-caffeoylquinic acid, chlorogenic acid, and 4-caffeoylquinic acid, respectively, according to the retention time (Table 1).

Alkyl phthalides, such as compound 116 (3-n-butylphthalide), showed abundant protonated molecular ions [M + H]+ in the positive ion mode (Table 1). Characteristic fragmentation ions were produced at m/z 173, 155, and 145 because of the continuous or simultaneous neutral loss of H2O and CO, while hydroxylated phthalides such as compound 55 (senkyunolide I) showed higher intensities at [M + H−H2O]+ (Table 1).

3.1.4. ARP

Terpenoids and their lactones are the main components of ARP. Terpene lactones were easily detected by the loss of H2O, CO, and CnH2n in the positive ion mode. One organic acid and three terpene lactones were identified according to the fragmentation rules.

Compound 175 presented a deprotonated molecular ion [M − H] (m/z 233.1532) in the positive ion mode, indicating a molecular formula of C16H18O9. Fragmentation ions at m/z 215.1431 and 187.1473 indicated the continuous neutral loss of H2O and CO, whereas the m/z values 159.0795, 145.1009, and 131.0848 indicated the continuous neutral loss of CnH2n; thus, compound 175 was identified as atractylenolide II (Table 1).

3.1.5. GRP

Flavonoids and saponins are the primary components of GRP. Flavonoids have a cyclohexene structure, which readily occurred owing to reverse Diels–Alder (RDA) cleavage in the negative ion mode. Except for the aglycones of compounds 77 and 127, all flavonoids were flavonoid glycosides, which were subdivided into O-glycosides and C-glycosides owing to the different bonding types between glycosyl and aglycones (Table 1). The former can only be detected by the loss of different types of glycosyl groups (Glc, Api, and others), whereas the latter can also be detected by the fragments of CnH2nOn generated from cross-ring cleavage reactions. Saponins can be easily detected by the characteristic fragments of glucuronic acid residues (GlcA) at m/z 351.05 and 193.03 in the negative ion mode. Seventeen flavonoids, 18 saponins, and 1 organic acid were identified according to the fragmentation rules.

Compound 37 presented an [M − H] peak at m/z 563.1408, indicating a molecular formula of C26H28O14. Fragmentation ions at the m/z values 503.1197, 473.1098, 443.0992, 413.0882, 383.0778, and 353.0674 indicated the continuous neutral loss of CH2O (30 Da); therefore, compound 37 was identified as schaftoside, as shown in Figure S2B. Compound 40 was identified as liquiritin using standard solutions, which presented an [M − H] peak at m/z 417.1194 and characteristic product ions at m/z 255.0665 with the loss of Glc, and m/z values of 135.0089 and 119.0504 due to RDA cleavage (Table 1). Other flavonoids were identified using data from the literature.

According to the standard solutions, compound 150 was identified as glycyrrhizic acid, which showed [M − H] at m/z 821.3972, and m/z 803.3855, 777.4059, and 759.3961 due to the simultaneous loss of CO2 and H2O. Fragmentation ions at m/z 645.3648, 469.3324, 351.0572, and 193.0356 indicated that the mother skeleton was connected to two GlcA groups (Table 1). There were some isomers at m/z 821.39, 823.41, and 837.39 that were preliminarily characterized according to their fragmentation rules and retention times in the literature.

3.1.6. ZSS

Flavonoids and saponins are the main components of ZSS. A total of 10 flavonoids, 2 saponins, 9 alkaloids, and 2 organic acids were identified.

Most of the identified flavonoids contained a structure nucleus of spinosin, and a few of them were the common C-glycosyl flavonoids. Fragmentation ions at m/z 327.08 represented the flavonoid base peak of spinosin in the positive ion mode, and m/z 445.11, 427.10, 325.07, and 307.06 were detected in the negative ion mode (Table 1). Compound 47 was identified as spinosin based on a comparison of standard solutions and presented [M − H] at m/z 607.1674. Owing to the cross-ring cleavage reaction, characteristic product ions at m/z 487.1252, 367.0823, 337.0722, and 307.0614 were readily observed. In addition, m/z 445.1144 and 427.1039 indicated the neutral loss of Glc and H2O, as shown in Figure S2C. Other spinosin flavonoids were identified in the same manner. Common C-glycosyl flavonoids also displayed a neutral loss of CnH2nOn due to the cross-ring cleavage reaction. Combined with the [M − H] peak, compounds 28 and 48 were identified as vicenin II and swertisin, respectively (Table 1).

A large number of dammarane-type triterpene glycosides, including inner and outer sugar, were detected in ZSS. The inner sugar was usually Ara (132 Da), whereas the outer sugar generally included Xyl (132 Da), Rha (146 Da), or Glc (162 Da). The characteristic aglycone ions and dehydration products of saponin were easily observed at m/z 455.35 and 437.34, respectively.

Alkaloids can only be detected in the positive ion mode. Compounds 12, 23, and 25 yielded [M]+, whereas others produced [M + H]+ peaks (Table 1). According to the MS1/MS2 data, eight isoquinoline alkaloids and one cyclopeptide alkaloid were identified.

3.1.7. PRP

The main components of PRP are xanthones, sucrose esters, oligosaccharide esters, and saponins. Both sucrose esters and xanthones have low molecular weights, whereas oligosaccharide esters and saponins are larger. Based on the fragmentation characteristics of the different types of components, 16 sucrose esters, 14 oligosaccharide esters, 11 saponins, 6 xanthones, and 2 organic acids were identified.

The main characteristic of sugar esters in the negative mode is the neutral loss of acyl (acetyl, feruloyl, p-coumaroyl, sinapoyl, and p-hydroxy benzoyl) residues. For example, compound 90 produced an [M − H] ion at m/z 767.2416, which corresponds to the molecular formula of C35H44O19. In the MS/MS spectrum, Z2 (m/z 529.1567), Z1 (m/z 367.1038), 0,4X (m/z 325.0935), 0,2X (m/z 265.0721), Y2 (m/z 237.0770), Z0 (m/z 205.0507), Y0 (m/z 223.0613), and Z0−CH3 (m/z 190.0271) ions were formed. The presence of Z2, Y2 and Y0, Z0 ions indicated the existence of 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid and sinapoyl, respectively. The presence of Z2, Z1 and Z0 ions indicated that 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid and sinapoyl moieties were situated on the glucose and fructose residues, respectively. Therefore, compound 90 was deduced to be tenuifoliside C, as shown in Figure S3. The fragmentation rule of oligosaccharide esters was similar to that of sucrose esters. Compound 119 produced an [M − H] ion at m/z 1349.4019, corresponding to the molecular formula of C61H74O34, whereas the m/z values 1307.3907 and 163.0409, 145.0304 indicated the presence of acetyl and p-coumaroyl, respectively; thus, it was identified as tenuifoliose H (Table 1). The remaining 15 sucrose esters and 13 oligosaccharide esters were characterized on the basis of fragmentation rules and the literature.

The basic structure of saponins in PRP mainly comprised an aglycone substituted at C-3 with a mono-glucosyl saccharide (A-chain) and at C-28 with a second complex oligosaccharide (B-chain). Saponins produced characteristic fragments at m/z 455 and 425 in the negative ion mode because of the easy elimination of CH2OH (30 Da) on C-14. For example, compound 107 produced a deprotonated molecular ion [M − H] (m/z 1103.5328) in the negative ion mode, indicating a molecular formula of C53H84O24. Characteristic fragments were easily observed at m/z 455.3185 [M − H−Glc−H2O−CO2−Fuc−Rha−Xyl] and m/z 425.3075 [M−H−Glc−H2O−CO2−Fuc−Rha−Xyl−CH2O] in the MS/MS spectrum. Therefore, compound 107 was deduced to be polygalasaponin XXVIII (Table 1). According to the fragmentation rules, the remaining 10 saponins were preliminarily characterized.

Characteristic fragments of CnH2nOn were found for xanthones due to cross-ring cleavage. Compound 41 showed a deprotonated molecular [M − H] ion at m/z 567.1361, indicating a molecular formula of C25H28O15. In the MS/MS spectrum, fragment ions at m/z 435.0932, 417.0839, 375.0736, 357.0621, 345.0620, 327.0518, 315.0515, and 297.0408 corresponded to Y1, Y1−H2O, 0,4X, 0,4X−H2O, 0,3X, 0,3X−H2O, 0,2X, and 0,2X−H2O, respectively. The Y1 ions were generated by the loss of Api. The 0,2X, 0,3X, and 0,4X ions were observed in the MS/MS spectrum, mainly via the cross-ring cleavage reactions in the Glc residue. Therefore, compound 10 was identified as polygalaxanthone III, as shown in Figure 2.

Details are in the caption following the image
MS/MS spectra and the proposed fragmentation pathways of polygalaxanthone III.

3.2. Characterizing the Prototype Components in Plasma after Oral Administration of Qi-Fu-Yin

The identification process for the prototype components was similar to that used in vitro. Using the same UPLC-Q-TOF-MS conditions, 51 prototype components were preliminarily identified by comparing the components of Qi-Fu-Yin in vitro, including 24 triterpene saponins, 10 phthalides, 8 flavonoids, 4 sucrose esters, 1 organic acid, 1 alkaloid, 1 xanthone, 1 terpene lactone, and 1 ionone. Among them, 10 components were compared with the reference standards, and others were identified by comparing the retention times, fragmentation pathways, and MS/MS spectra (Table 2, Figure 3).

Table 2. Characterization of prototypical components and metabolites in rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid after oral administration of Qi-Fu-Yin.
No. tR (min) Name Formula Theoretical mass (Da) Measured mass (Da) Error (ppm) Precursor ions Main MS/MS fragment ions P CSF
P1 4.17 Sibiricose A5 C22H30O14 517.1563 517.1566 0.6 [M − H] 193.0514, 175.0405, 160.0170 +
P2 5.13 Sibiricose A1 C23H32O15 547.1668 547.1658 −1.8 [M − H] 367.1030, 223.0627, 205.0508, 190.0274 +
P3 7.31 Magnoflorine C20H23NO4+ 342.1700 342.1697 −0.8 [M + H]+ 297.1119, 282.0888, 265.0843 +
P4 13.59 Liquiritin C21H22O9 417.1191 417.1189 −0.5 [M − H] 255.0666, 135.0091, 119.0508 +
P5 14.07 Polygalaxanthone III C25H28O15 567.1355 567.1352 −0.5 [M − H] 435.0944, 357.0600, 345.0606, 315.0522, 297.0395 +
P6 14.16 Liquiritin apioside C26H30O13 549.1614 549.1609 −0.9 [M − H] 255.0662, 417.1186, 175.02373, 135.0086, 113.0248 +
P7 14.85 Spinosin C28H32O15 607.1668 607.1665 −0.5 [M − H] 487.1252, 445.1177, 367.0823, 337.0722, 307.0614 +
P8 17.24 Senkyunolide I C12H16O4 207.1015 207.1012 −1.4 [M + H–H2O]+ 189.0910, 161.1026, 147.0814 + +
P9 18.77 Senkyunolide H C12H16O4 207.1015 207.1013 −1.0 [M + H–H2O]+ + +
P10 18.88 3,6′-Disinapoyl sucrose C34H42O19 753.2248 753.2251 0.4 [M − H] 547.1668, 529.1565, 265.0748, 223.0595, 205.0540 + +
P11 19.46 3,4,5-Trimethoxycinnamic acid C12H14O5 237.0768 237.0766 −0.8 [M − H] 193.0870, 161.0609, 108.0217 +
P12 20.90 Isoliquiritin apioside C26H30O13 549.1614 549.1628 2.5 [M − H] 255.0664, 135.0077, 119.0515 +
P13 21.29 Isoliquiritin C21H22O9 417.1191 417.1195 1.0 [M − H] 255.0659, 135.0089, 119.0499 +
P14 21.58 Tenuifoliside A C31H38O17 681.2036 681.2002 −5.0 [M − H] 179.0327, 137.0244 +
P15 22.35 Liquiritigenin C15H12O4 255.0663 255.0665 0.8 [M − H] 135.0087, 119.0503 +
P16 23.69 Senkyunolide D or isomer C12H14O4 221.0819 221.0823 1.8 [M − H] 177.0927, 147.0459 +
P17 24.48 Ginsenoside Rg1 C42H72O14 845.4904 845.4900 −0.5 [M + COOH] 475.3815, 179.0564, 161.0454 +
P18 24.85 Ginsenoside Re C48H82O18 991.5483 991.5436 −4.7 [M + COOH] 783.4934, 475.3719, 179.0566, 161.0460 +
P19 26.01 Senkyunolide D or isomer C12H14O4 221.0819 221.0821 0.9 [M − H] 177.0925, 147.0453, 134.0374 +
P20 30.70 Aeginetic acid C15H24O4 267.1602 267.1608 2.2 [M − H] 178.9213, 153.0928 +
P21 32.08 Polygalasaponin XXVIII C53H84O24 1103.5280 1103.5280 0.0 [M − H] 455.3189, 425.3078 +
P22 32.66 Senkyunolide F or isomer C12H14O3 205.0870 205.0872 1.0 [M − H] 161.0977, 187.9911, 149.0043 +
P23 32.90 Butylidenephthalide C12H12O2 189.0910 189.0913 1.6 [M + H]+ 171.0768, 161.0935, 143.0845, 117.0676 + +
P24 33.22 Butylphthalide C12H14O2 191.1066 191.1064 −1.0 [M + H]+ + +
P25 34.01 Ginsenoside Rf C42H72O14 845.4904 845.4887 −2.0 [M + COOH] 179.0575, 161.0465 +
P26 34.38 Senkyunolide A or isomer C12H16O2 193.1223 193.1228 2.6 [M + H]+ 147.1167, 175.1169, 137.0591 +
P27 35.35 Licorice saponin A3 C48H72O21 983.4493 983.4463 −3.1 [M − H] 351.0583, 193.0364 +
P28 35.64 Isoliquiritigenin C15H12O4 255.0663 255.0658 −2.0 [M − H] 135.0083, 119.0498 +
P29 35.83 Formononetin C16H12O4 267.0663 267.0657 −2.2 [M − H] +
P30 36.61 Tenuifolin C36H56O12 679.3699 679.3718 2.8 [M − H] 455.3136, 425.3101 + +
P31 36.80 22-Hydroxyl-glycyrrhizin C42H62O17 837.3914 837.3894 −2.4 [M − H] 351.0584, 193.0366 +
P32 36.89 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rh1 C36H62O9 683.4376 683.4367 −1.3 [M + COOH] 637.4335, 475.3806, 161.0462 + +
P33 37.37 Senkyunolide A or isomer C12H16O2 193.1223 193.1224 0.5 [M + H]+ 175.1158, 147.1162, 137.0595 +
P34 37.66 20(R)-Ginsenoside Rh1 C36H62O9 683.4376 683.4367 −1.3 [M + COOH] 161.0463 + +
P35 37.85 Jujuboside A C58H94O26 1251.6015 1251.5971 −3.5 [M + COOH] 179.0566, 161.0465 +
P36 38.72 Ginsenoside Rb1 C54H92O23 1153.6011 1153.5980 −2.7 [M + COOH] 1107.5959 +
P37 39.69 Ginsenoside Ro C48H76O19 955.4908 955.4899 −0.9 [M − H] 793.4379, 179.0563, 119.0352 +
P38 39.69 Ginsenoside Rc C53H90O22 1123.5906 1123.5856 −4.5 [M + COOH] 459.3809, 149.0451, 191.0563 +
P39 39.78 Licorice saponin G2 C42H62O17 837.3914 837.3891 −2.7 [M − H] 351.056, 193.0351 +
P40 40.75 Ginsenoside Rb2 C53H90O22 1123.5906 1123.5908 0.2 [M + COOH] 1077.5866 +
P41 41.32 Rhaoglycyrrhizin C48H72O20 967.4544 967.4506 −3.9 [M − H] 1077.5859 +
P42 42.76 Glycyrrhizic acid C42H62O16 821.3965 821.3942 −2.8 [M − H] 645.3641, 351.0564, 193.0351, 175.0249 +
P43 42.76 Ginsenoside Rd C48H82O18 991.5483 991.5474 −0.9 [M + COOH] 179.0564, 161.0456 +
P44 44.63 Atractylenolide I C15H18O2 231.1379 231.1378 −0.4 [M + H]+ +
P45 46.13 Licorice saponin J2 C42H64O16 823.4122 823.4091 −3.8 [M − H] 351.0573, 193.0357 +
P46 46.90 Ginsenoside Rk3 C36H60O8 665.4270 665.4248 −3.3 [M + COOH] 161.0449 +
P47 47.09 Ginsenoside Rh4 C36H60O8 665.4270 665.4258 −1.8 [M + COOH] 161.0450 +
P48 47.38 Zingibroside R1 C42H66O14 793.4380 793.4374 −0.8 [M − H] 731.4388, 631.3849 + +
P49 47.86 Ginsenoside Rg3 C42H72O13 829.4955 829.4934 −2.5 [M − H] 783.4886, 621.4365, 459.3812, 161.0454 +
P50 49.40 Z-Ligustilide C12H14O2 191.1066 191.1070 2.1 [M + H]+ +
P51 52.30 Glycyrrhetinic acid C30H46O4 469.3323 469.3316 −1.5 [M − H] 425.3414 + +
M1 8.78 Ferulic acid-4-sulfate C10H10O7S 273.0074 273.0074 0.0 [M − H] 193.0507, 149.0246 +
M2 9.45 Ferulic acid-4-sulfate isomer C10H10O7S 273.0074 273.0073 −0.4 [M − H] 193.0504, 149.0245 +
M3 13.59 Liquiritigenin-7-O-glucuronide C21H20O10 431.0984 431.0977 −1.6 [M − H] 255.0662, 175.0250, 135.0088 + +
M4 13.97 Liquiritigenin-4′-O-glucuronide C21H20O10 431.0984 431.0982 −0.5 [M − H] 255.0662, 175.025, 135.0088 + +
M5 15.70 Liquiritigenin+2H + sulfate C15H14O7S 337.0382 337.0380 −0.6 [M − H] 257.0824 +
M6 17.83 Liquiritigenin-4′-O-sulfate C15H12O7S 335.0231 335.0225 −1.8 [M − H] 255.0664, 135.0088, 119.0503 +
M7 19.36 (Iso)Liquiritigenin+2H + sulfate C15H14O7S 337.0382 337.0383 0.3 [M − H] 257.0823, 151.0401 +
M8 20.81 (Iso)Liquiritigenin+2H + sulfate C15H14O7S 337.0382 337.0385 0.9 [M − H] 257.0820, 151.0398 +
M9 21.10 Formononetin-7-O-glucuronide C22H20O10 443.0984 443.0984 0.0 [M − H] 267.0661, 175.0249, 135.0453 +
M10 23.12 Isoliquiritigenin-4′-O-glucuronide C21H20O10 431.0984 431.0978 −1.4 [M − H] 255.0662, 175.0247, 135.0088 + +
M11 27.07 Isoliquiritigenin+2H + sulfate C15H14O7S 337.0382 337.0390 2.4 [M − H] 257.0821 +
M12 28.20 Acetylcysteine conjugate of senkyunolide I or senkyunolide H C17H23NO6S 370.1324 370.1316 −2.2 [M + H]+ 207.1024, 189.0925, 161.0957 +
M13 29.38 Formononetin-7-O-sulfate C16H12O7S 347.0231 347.0230 −0.3 [M − H] 267.0664, 252.0429 +
M14 29.67 Isoliquiritigenin-6′-O-sulfate C15H12O7S 335.0231 335.0236 1.5 [M − H] 255.0666, 135.009, 119.0508 +
M15 38.72 Compound K-H2 C36H60O8 619.4215 619.4193 −3.6 [M − H] 457.3683, 439.3216 +
M16 45.27 Compound K C36H62O8 621.4372 621.4355 −2.7 [M − H] 459.3846, 179.0559, 161.0453 +
M17 45.94 Compound K+2O-2H2 C36H58O10 665.3906 665.3883 −3.5 [M − H] 651.4118, 409.2751, 375.2533 +
M18 46.42 Compound K+3O-H2 C36H59O11 667.4063 667.4047 −2.4 [M − H] 605.4042, 491.3720, 175.0237, 113.0242 +
M19 46.90 Compound K+3O-H2 C36H59O11 667.4063 667.4042 −3.1 [M − H] 605.4029, 491.3724, 175.0241, 113.0242 +
M20 46.99 Compound K+2O-2H2 C36H58O10 665.3906 665.3893 −2.0 [M − H] 651.4113, 409.2746, 375.2527 +
M21 47.76 Compound K+2O-2H2 C36H58O10 665.3906 665.3897 −1.4 [M − H] 651.4119, 409.2752, 375.2535 +
M22 48.13 Glycyrrhetinic acid-2H C30H44O4 469.3318 469.3312 −1.3 [M+H]+ 451.3203, 423.3243 +
M23 48.15 Glycyrrhetinic acid + O C30H46O5 485.3272 485.3263 −1.9 [M − H] 441.3357 + +
M24 48.34 Compound K+2O-2H2 C36H58O10 665.3906 665.3904 −0.3 [M − H] 491.3368, 473.3269, 443.3161, 193.0352, 175.0246, 113.0242 +
M25 48.92 Glycyrrhetinic acid + O C30H46O5 485.3272 485.3256 −3.3 [M − H] 441.3361 + +
M26 49.59 Protopanaxadiol+2O + H2 C30H50O5 489.3585 489.3575 −2.0 [M − H] 473.3261, 445.3677, 375.2896 +
M27 45.36 Glycyrrhetinic acid + O C30H46O5 485.3272 485.3279 1.4 [M − H] 441.3383 +
  • P, plasma; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; −, not detected +, detected.
Details are in the caption following the image
Extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of prototypical components of Qi-Fu-Yin in the dosed and control plasma in the negative and positive ion modes. (A)–(C) Dosed plasma in the negative mode. (a)–(c) Control plasma in the negative mode. (D) Dosed plasma in the positive mode. (d) Control plasma in the positive mode. Because of the presence of many prototype components in rat plasma, they could not be displayed in the same figure and were, therefore, divided into three panels: (A), (B), and (C).

Some saponins with low molecular weights can be directly absorbed into blood. For example, P53 produced the adduct ion [M + COOH] (m/z 829.4934) and deprotonated molecular ion [M − H] (m/z 783.4886), indicating a molecular formula of C42H72O13. Diagnostic ions at m/z 621.4365, 459.3812, and 161.0454 suggested that it was a PPD-type ginsenoside with continuous or simultaneous elimination of Glc moieties. Thus, P53 was assigned to ginsenoside Rg3 (Figure 4(a)). P41 produced an [M − H] peak at m/z 837.3891, indicating a molecular formula of C42H62O17. Furthermore, P41 was identified as glycyrrhizin G2 because of the characteristic fragments of glucuronic acid residues, which were readily detected at m/z 351.056 and 193.0351 in the negative ion mode (Figure 4(b)).

Details are in the caption following the image
EICs and MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 and licorice saponin G2 in the dosed and control plasma in the negative ion mode. (a) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (b) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma. (c) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the control plasma. (d) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the control plasma. (e) MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (f) MS/MS spectra of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma.
Details are in the caption following the image
EICs and MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 and licorice saponin G2 in the dosed and control plasma in the negative ion mode. (a) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (b) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma. (c) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the control plasma. (d) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the control plasma. (e) MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (f) MS/MS spectra of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma.
Details are in the caption following the image
EICs and MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 and licorice saponin G2 in the dosed and control plasma in the negative ion mode. (a) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (b) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma. (c) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the control plasma. (d) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the control plasma. (e) MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (f) MS/MS spectra of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma.
Details are in the caption following the image
EICs and MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 and licorice saponin G2 in the dosed and control plasma in the negative ion mode. (a) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (b) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma. (c) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the control plasma. (d) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the control plasma. (e) MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (f) MS/MS spectra of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma.
Details are in the caption following the image
EICs and MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 and licorice saponin G2 in the dosed and control plasma in the negative ion mode. (a) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (b) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma. (c) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the control plasma. (d) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the control plasma. (e) MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (f) MS/MS spectra of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma.
Details are in the caption following the image
EICs and MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 and licorice saponin G2 in the dosed and control plasma in the negative ion mode. (a) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (b) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma. (c) EIC of ginsenoside Rg3 in the control plasma. (d) EIC of licorice saponin G2 in the control plasma. (e) MS/MS spectra of ginsenoside Rg3 in the dosed plasma. (f) MS/MS spectra of licorice saponin G2 in the dosed plasma.

Hydroxylated phthalides showed a higher intensity at [M + H−H2O]+ and were detected by the loss of H2O, CO, and CnH2n through ring opening in the positive ion mode. For example, P10 and P11 produced [M + H–H2O]+ at m/z 207.10, and the characteristic fragmentation ions at m/z 189.09, 161.10, and 147.08 indicated neutral loss of H2O, CO, and C3H6. P10 and P11 were identified as senkyunolides I and H, respectively, according to the retention time (Figure S4).

3.3. Characterization of Metabolites in Plasma after Oral Administration of Qi-Fu-Yin

Twenty-six metabolites were preliminarily identified by comparing with data from the metabolite database, mainly including oxidation, reduction, glucuronidation, and sulfation (Table 2, Figure 5). The pathways of some metabolites are shown in Figure 6.

Details are in the caption following the image
EICs of metabolites of Qi-Fu-Yin in the dosed and control plasma in the negative and positive ion modes. (A)-(B) Dosed plasma in the negative mode. (a)-(b) Control plasma in the negative mode. (C) Dosed plasma in the positive mode. (c) Control plasma in the positive mode. Because of the presence of many metabolites in the rat plasma, they cannot be displayed in the same figure and are, therefore, divided into two panels: (A) and (B).
Details are in the caption following the image
Proposed metabolic pathways of some metabolites in rat plasma after oral administration of Qi-Fu-Yin. GluA, glucuronic acid residue.

The [M–H] ions of M1 and M2 were at m/z 273.00, which showed a mass shift of 79.96 Da (SO3) from 193.05 [ferulic acid–H] and provided the fragment ions at m/z 149.02 [ferulic acid–H–CO2]. Combined with the predicted chemical formula of C10H10O7S, M1 and M2 were tentatively deduced to be sulfate conjugates of ferulic acid [36] (Figure 6).

M3, M4, and M10 showed the [M–H] ion at m/z 431.10, which was 176.03 Da more than that of isoliquiritigenin. The MS2 spectra of M3, M4, and M10 all provided fragment ions at m/z 255.07, 175.02, and 135.01, respectively, which suggested the presence of an isoliquiritigenin group. Combining these data with the retention times [46], M3, M4, and M10 were tentatively deduced to be liquiritigenin-7-O-glucuronide, liquiritigenin-4′-O-glucuronide, and isoliquiritigenin-4′-O-glucuronide, respectively (Figure 6).

M6 and M14 showed the [M–H] ion at m/z 335.02 (C15H12O7S), which was 79.96 Da (SO3) more than that at m/z 255.07. Upon combining data from the retention time and characteristic fragmentation ions at m/z 255.07 and 135.01, M6 and M14 were identified as liquiritigenin-4′-O-sulfate and isoliquiritigenin-6′-O-sulfate, respectively (Figure 6). Similarly, the [M–H] ion of M5, M7, M8, and M11 at m/z 337.04 was approximately 2 Da more than that of M6 and M14. The product ions at m/z 257.08 were also approximately 2 Da more than those at 255.07. Combining these data with the retention time, M5, M7, M8, and M11 were deduced to be hydrogenation and sulfate conjugates of (iso)liquiritigenin (Figure 6).

M9 and M13 produced the same fragment ions at m/z 267.07, which were believed to be metabolites of formononetin; according to the adduct ions of m/z 443.0984 and 347.0230, they were identified as formononetin-7-O-glucuronide and formononetin-7-O-sulfate, respectively (Figure 6).

M12 produced fragmentation ions at m/z 207.1024 [M + H−145−H2O]+ and 189.0925 [M + H−145−2H2O]+, which suggested the presence of a phthalide group. Combining these data with the [M + H]+ ion at m/z 370.1316 (C17H23NO6S), M12 was identified as an acetylcysteine conjugate of ligustilide I or H (Table 2).

The fragment ions at m/z 459.3846, 179.0559, and 161.0453 suggested that M16 was a PPD-type ginsenoside. Combining the predicted chemical formula of C36H62O8 and literature [29], M15, M17-21, and M24 were identified as related metabolites of compound K, according to their retention times and chemical formulae [29] (Table 2).

M22 produced fragments of m/z 423.3243 [M + H−CO2]+ in the positive ion mode, which is in accordance with the fragmentation rules of glycyrrhetinic acid. Furthermore, M22 exhibited [M + H]+ at m/z 469.3312, which was determined to be C30H44O4; therefore, M22 was identified as the dehydrogenization of glycyrrhetinic acid. Likewise, M23 and M25 produced [M–H] ions at m/z 485.3263 and fragments of m/z 441.3357 in the negative ion mode, which represented a neutral loss of CO2 (44 Da), and were identified as hydroxylate conjugates of glycyrrhetinic acid (Table 2).

3.4. Characterization of Prototypical Components and Metabolites in the Cerebrospinal Fluid after Oral Administration of Qi-Fu-Yin

Using the same UPLC-Q-TOF-MS conditions, 10 prototype components (P8-P10, 23, 24, 30, 32, 34, 48, and 51) and 6 metabolites (M3, 4, 10, 23, 25, and 27) were preliminarily identified by comparing the components of the drugged rat plasma, among which two components were compared with the reference standards, and others were identified by comparing the retention times, fragmentation pathways, and MS/MS spectra (Table 2 and Figure 7).

Details are in the caption following the image
EICs of prototypical components and metabolites of Qi-Fu-Yin in the dosed and control cerebrospinal fluid in the negative and positive ion modes. (A)-(B) Dosed cerebrospinal fluid in the negative mode. (a)-(b) Control cerebrospinal fluid in the negative mode. (C) Dosed cerebrospinal fluid in the positive mode. (c) Control cerebrospinal fluid in the positive mode. Because of the presence of many metabolites in the rat cerebrospinal fluid, they cannot be displayed in the same figure and are, therefore, divided into two panels: (A) and (B).

4. Discussion

In recent years, LC-MS technology has been widely used in the analysis of components of TCM, combining the high separation ability of liquid chromatography with the high sensitivity of mass spectrometry [47, 48]. Up to now, the only research on the identification of components in Qi-Fu-Yin was based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS in vitro [10]. In this present study, the same 110 components were detected consistent with previous studies [10], and 70 components were preliminarily identified for the first time in vitro (Table 1, Table S1). Among them, forty-four reported components [10] were undetected, and 18 of them were lost due to different scanning ranges (Table S1).

Qi-Fu-Yin consists of seven herbs, but there is no research on the similarities and differences of components between them after decocting. For the first time, upon comparing Qi-Fu-Yin with the seven herbs, the categories of chemical components were found to be unanimous, and the number of flavonoids and organic acids in Qi-Fu-Yin was more than the sum of seven herbs; however, the opposite was true for phenylethanoid glycosides (Figure S5). Most of the chemical components could be detected in both, but 9 and 13 chemical components were only detected in the seven herbs and Qi-Fu-Yin, respectively, and the configuration of some components changed (Figure S5, Table 1). This showed that the chemical composition of Qi-Fu-Yin is not a simple addition of compounds in its single herbs.

As far as we know, the prototype components and metabolites of the seven herbs, not Qi-Fu-Yin, in the plasma after oral administration have been reported. For example, saponins in GRR [49], GRP [46], ZSS [50], flavonoids in GRP [51], ZSS [50], phthalides in ASR [36, 52], sugar esters in PRP [53], phenylethanoid glycosides, and iridoid glycoside in RRP [54] are the main components in plasma after oral administration of herbs. In this research, 51 prototypical components and 26 metabolites of Qi-Fu-Yin, including saponins, phthalides, flavonoids, sucrose esters, organic acids, alkaloids, ionones, terpene lactones, iridoid glycoside, and their derivatives have been tentatively identified in the plasma for the first time.

Similarly, the prototype components and metabolites in the cerebrospinal fluid after oral administration of Qi-Fu-Yin have not been reported. Several research showed that some saponins in GRR [55, 56], GRP [57], and phthalides in ASR [58, 59] can be absorbed into the cerebrospinal fluid. In addition, saponins in GRR [60] and GRP [61], flavonoids in ZSS [62], and source esters in PRP [53] have been determined in the brain tissue homogenate. In this research, 10 prototypical components and 6 metabolites were preliminarily characterized in the rat cerebrospinal fluid after oral administration of Qi-Fu-Yin. Among them, butylidenephthalide, butylphthalide, 20(S)-ginsenoside Rh1, 20(R)-ginsenoside Rh1, zingibroside R1, and six other metabolites were detected in the cerebrospinal fluid for the first time. Some prototype components, as saponins, phthalides, and sucrose esters, could be directly absorbed into plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, and phthalides had a higher absorption rate (Figure 8). Some flavonoids, organic acids, alkaloids, xanthones, terpene lactones, and iridoid glycosides could be absorbed into the plasma, whereas other categories of chemical components were not detected in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

Details are in the caption following the image
Proportion of different types of components in Qi-Fu-Yin, the plasma, and the cerebrospinal fluid.

Studies have shown that glycyrrhetinic acid [57], 3,6′-disinapoyl sucrose [63], tenuifolin [64], and senkyunolide I and H [65] can be absorbed into cerebrospinal fluid. Some components have been determined in the brain tissue homogenate [6668], but whether these components can penetrate the BBB is unknown, and they may only exist in the astrocytes and/or vascular endothelial cells constituting the BBB. In this study, 3,6′-disinapoyl sucrose, ginsenoside Rh1, butylphthalide, glycyrrhetinic acid, tenuifolin, and senkyunolide I and H were detected in cerebrospinal fluid. Many studies showed that they had promising effects on neuroprotection, antiapoptosis, anti-inflammation, or antioxidative stress (Table 3). This suggested that these compounds might be potentially active components of Qi-Fu-Yin for treating AD.

Table 3. Effects of prototype components in the cerebrospinal fluid after oral administration of Qi-Fu-Yin anti-Alzheimer’s disease.
Compound Samples Biomarkers Effects References
3,6′-Disinapoyl sucrose Glutamate and H2O2-induced SHSY5Y cells
  1. Protein expression of CREB↑
  2. Protein expression of BDNF↑
Neuroprotection [69]
Glutamate-induced SHSY5Y cells
  1. mRNA expression of Bax↓
  2. mRNA expression of Bcl-2↑
Antiapoptosis [70]
Ginsenoside Rh1 Mice (6-month-old)
  1. Number of crosses, time spent in platform quadrant↑ in the Morris water maze test
  2. Protein expression of BDNF↑
Neuroprotection [71]
IFN-γ-stimulated BV2 cells Amounts of NO, ROS, and TNF-α Anti-inflammation [72]
Scopolamine-induced amnesic mice
  1. Escape latency↓ in the Morris water maze test
  2. Activity of SOD and CAT↑
Antioxidative stress [73]
Butylphthalide APP/PS1 mice Escape latency↓, the time spent and travel distance in the target quadrant↑ in the Morris water maze test Neuroprotection [74]
Aβ1-42-induced SD rats Protein expression of MAPK↓ Antiapoptosis [75]
Senkyunolide H
  1. 1-Methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced
  2. PC12 cells
  1. Amounts of ROS, MDA↓
  2. Activities of SOD, CAT, GSH-Px↑
Antioxidative stress [76]
Protein expression of Bax and caspase-3↓ Antiapoptosis [76]
Tenuifolin Aβ1-42-induced BV2 cells Amounts of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β Anti-inflammation [77]
  1. mRNA expression of iNOS and COX-2↓
  2. Amount of NO↓
Antioxidative stress [77]
Senkyunolide I Glutamate-induced Neuro2a cells Amount of caspase-3↓ Antiapoptosis [78]
Glycyrrhetinic acid BACE1 FRET assay Activity of BACE1↓ Neuroprotection [79]
  • ↓, decrease; ↑, increase; Aβ, amyloid-β; CREB, cyclic AMP response element binding protein; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Bax, Bcl-2 associated X protein; Bcl-2, B cell lymphoma/leukemia-2; NO, nitric oxide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; IL-6, interleukin 6; IL-1β, interleukin 1β; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; BACE1: β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the chemical components of Qi-Fu-Yin in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid after oral administration of Qi-Fu-Yin were preliminarily characterized using UPLC-Q-TOF-MS. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic investigation of the metabolic profiles of the constituents of Qi-Fu-Yin. In total, 51 prototypical components and 26 metabolites were tentatively identified in plasma. The major phase I metabolic pathway of Qi-Fu-Yin involved hydrogenation and oxidation, whereas that of phase II reactions included sulfate and glucuronic acid conjugation. Furthermore, 10 prototypical components and 6 metabolites, which might be responsible for the potential activity of Qi-Fu-Yin, were preliminarily characterized in the cerebrospinal fluid. This study provides a chemical basis for elucidating the active components of Qi-Fu-Yin that play roles in the treatment of AD and should further motivate research on the mechanisms underlying the anti-AD activity of Qi-Fu-Yin.

Ethical Approval

All animal procedures were approved by the Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Institutional Animal Experimentation Committee (SDUTCM20210119001).

Disclosure

Hengyu Li and Hongwei Zhao are co-first authors. Xiaorui Cheng and Jiafeng Wang are conjointly designated as corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiaorui Cheng, Jiafeng Wang initiated and designed the study. Hengyu Li, Hongwei Zhao, and Xiaorui Cheng developed the method and drafted the manuscript. Dongmei Qi and Yong Yang provided experimental platform and equipment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Shandong Academy of Sciences and Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Experimental Center for providing experimental platform and equipment and thanks to Xiaoming Wang for guiding this research. This study was supported by Major Basic Research Projects of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020ZD17) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR202103040693, ZR2021QH271).

    Data Availability

    The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and are available from the corresponding author upon request.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.