Finite Time Synchronization of Extended Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Using Local Coupling
Abstract
We consider two reaction-diffusion equations connected by one-directional coupling function and study the synchronization problem in the case where the coupling function affects the driven system in some specific regions. We derive conditions that ensure that the evolution of the driven system closely tracks the evolution of the driver system at least for a finite time. The framework built to achieve our results is based on the study of an abstract ordinary differential equation in a suitable Hilbert space. As a specific application we consider the Gray-Scott equations and perform numerical simulations that are consistent with our main theoretical results.
1. Introduction
The synchronization of the evolution of systems that are sensitive to changes in the initial condition is a phenomenon that occurs spontaneously in systems ranging from biology to physics. As a matter of fact, starting from publications by Fujisaka and Yamada [1] and later by Pecora and Carroll [2], there have been many explanations about the occurrence of this phenomenon as well as new practical applications [3]; among these we highlight [4]. For localized systems (ODE) the problem is well understood; see, for example, [4, 5] and the references therein. On the other hand, a much smaller number of results are available for extended systems represented by partial differential equations (PDE). Among these in [6, 7], the authors have considered a pair of unidirectionally coupled systems with a linear term that penalizes the separation between the actual states of the systems. When the coupling function is linear, the synchronization problem has been addressed through different approaches like invariant manifold method via Galerkin’s approximations [8], via an abstract formulation using semigroup theory [7, 9], or numerically [6].
With the exception of works [6, 10], in the rest of the references [7–9, 11, 12] the coupling function disturbs the system in its entirety. In contrast, in [6, 10], the authors propose a synchronization scheme that does need to disturb the whole driven system. Moreover, the subset of sites in the driven system is chosen arbitrarily.
In this work we present a general procedure for two reaction-diffusion equations connected through a one-directional coupling function. We study the synchronization problem in the case where the coupling function affects the driven system in some specific regions and our approach, which is based in an abstract formulation coming from semigroup theory, allows establishing a relation between the conditions to obtain synchronization in finite time and the intensity of the coupling. To illustrate the theoretical results we consider a pair of equations of Gray-Scott [13].
The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we set the problem, in Section 3 we give an abstract representation of the problem in a suitable Hilbert space, in Section 4 we give the main theoretical results, as the existence of bounded solutions of the abstract equation, in Section 5 we give an example and numerical simulations of the performance of the strategy, and finally in Section 6 we give some final remarks.
2. Setting of the Problem
3. Preliminaries and Abstract Formulation of the Problem
- (i)
A is a sectorial operator. As a consequence −A generates an analytic semigroup, e−At, which is, for each t > 0, compact.
- (ii)
The spectrum σ(A), of A, consists of just eigenvalues λi,j = dj(iπ/l) 2, with i = 1,2, … and j = 1,2, …, n. We order the set of eigenvalues {λi,j} according to the sequence 0 < λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ ⋯→∞, where
() - (iii)
There exists a complete orthonormal set , of eigenvectors of A, such that
() - (iv)
e−At is given by
()
The next proposition, whose proof is similar to the one given in [7], contains estimates relating the semigroup {e−At} with norms ‖·‖α and ‖·‖. Also, it will play an important role in the discussion of our main theoretical results.
Proposition 1. For each Φ ∈ Vα, α > 0, one has the following estimates:
The following lemma establishes that F is Lipschitz continuous in the second variable on Ur.
Lemma 2. There exists a constant L = L(Ur) such that for Φ1, Φ2 ∈ Ur, t > 0,
Proof. Given a ball of radius and center 0 in , there exists a positive constant such that for all .
For any Φ1, Φ2 ∈ Ur, we consider Δ≔|F(t, Φ1)(x) − F(t, Φ2)(x)|, 0 < x < l, and t > 0. Now, let us consider N and C as in (4) and (20), respectively. If we choose , then there exists such that
We finish this section with a lemma that will be used to obtain our main theoretical results. It can be established as an application of Lemma 3.3.2 in [14].
Lemma 3. A continuous function Φ : (0, t1) → V2α is a solution of the integral equation
4. Main Theoretical Results
Theorem 4. For any Φ0 ∈ int(Ur) there exists t1 = t1(Φ0) > 0 such that (22) has a unique solution Φ on (0, t1) with initial condition Φ(0) = Φ0.
Proof. By Lemma 3, it suffices to prove the corresponding result for integral equation (29).
Choose ρ > 0, with , such that the set
Let us define S as the set of continuous functions Ψ : [0, t1] → V2α such that on [0, t1]. If S is endowed with the supreme norm , then it is a complete metric space.
Now, for Ψ ∈ S we define T(Ψ) acting on [0, t1] as
Next, we shall prove that T is a contraction. In fact, if Ψ1, Ψ2 ∈ S and 0 ≤ t ≤ t1, then for we have that
Finally, by the Banach fixed point theorem, T has a unique fixed point Φ in S, which is a continuous solution of integral equation (29). By Lemma 3, this is the unique solution of (22) on (0, t1) with initial value Φ(0) = Φ0.
The previous theorem does not tell anything about the maximal interval where Φ is defined. In this regard we have the following.
Theorem 5. Assume that for every closed set B ⊂ int(Ur), F([0, ∞) × B) is bounded in H. If Φ is a solution of (22) on (0, t1) and t1 is maximal, then either t1 = +∞ or else there exists a sequence as n → ∞ such that Φ(tn) → ∂Ur.
Proof. Suppose t1 < ∞ and there is not neighborhood N of ∂Ur such that Φ(t) enters N for t in an interval [t1 − ϵ, t1), with ϵ small enough. We may take N of the form N = Ur − B where B is a closed subset of int(Ur), and Φ(t) ∈ B for t ∈ [t1 − ϵ, t1).
We are going to prove that there exists Φ1 ∈ B such that Φ(t) → Φ1 in V2α as , and this implies that the solution may be extended beyond time t1 (with Φ(t1) = Φ1), contradicting maximality of t1.
Now let M≔sup{‖F(t, Φ)‖ : t ≥ 0, Φ ∈ B}. We first show that ‖Φ(t)‖2α remains bounded on the interval (0, t1); in fact
Since e−At is compact for t > 0, then {e−At} is a uniformly continuous semigroup, which implies that ‖e−A(t−τ+ϵ) − e−Aϵ‖ → 0 as t → τ.
Finally from the estimates given for I1, I2, and I3 we conclude that there exists Φ1 ∈ B such that , and the proof is complete.
Corollary 6. There exists ϵ > 0 such that the solution Φ, of problem (22), satisfies the estimate
Proof. Let B a closed subset of V2α that contains the initial condition Φ0 in its interior and M≔sup{‖F(t, Φ)‖ : t ≥ 0, Φ ∈ B}. There exists such that
5. Example and Numerical Simulations
Proposition 7. There exists a real value function h, continuous and increasing on the interval (0, ∞) such that |g(x, t, e)| ≤ h(|e|) for all (x, t, e) in .
Proof. The estimates

6. Concluding Remarks
We present a synchronization scheme of reaction-diffusion equations connected by a localized one-directional coupling function and give conditions that ensure the synchronization at least for a finite time. Conditions for synchronization depend on a sort of coupling intensity given by the L2 norm of the coupling function. This norm is related to the intensity of local perturbation and its spatial extension, suggesting that this relation can be optimized in order to improve the synchronization or design of a control scheme.
Finally, although we have proven that the synchronization occurs in an interval of time, the numerical simulations suggest that this interval can be extended.
Disclosure
P. García’s permanent address is Laboratorio de Sistemas Complejos, Departamento de Física Aplicada, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Central de Venezuela.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.