Accuracy Improvement of Discharge Measurement with Modification of Distance Made Good Heading
Jongkook Lee
Disaster Information Analysis Center, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul 04212, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorHongjoon Shin
Department of Civil and Environment, Induk University, Seoul 01878, Republic of Korea induk.ac.kr
Search for more papers by this authorJeonghwan Ahn
Department of Civil and Environment, Induk University, Seoul 01878, Republic of Korea induk.ac.kr
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Changsam Jeong
Department of Civil and Environment, Induk University, Seoul 01878, Republic of Korea induk.ac.kr
Search for more papers by this authorJongkook Lee
Disaster Information Analysis Center, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul 04212, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorHongjoon Shin
Department of Civil and Environment, Induk University, Seoul 01878, Republic of Korea induk.ac.kr
Search for more papers by this authorJeonghwan Ahn
Department of Civil and Environment, Induk University, Seoul 01878, Republic of Korea induk.ac.kr
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Changsam Jeong
Department of Civil and Environment, Induk University, Seoul 01878, Republic of Korea induk.ac.kr
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Remote control boats equipped with an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) are widely accepted and have been welcomed by many hydrologists for water discharge, velocity profile, and bathymetry measurements. The advantages of this technique include high productivity, fast measurements, operator safety, and high accuracy. However, there are concerns about controlling and operating a remote boat to achieve measurement goals, especially during extreme events such as floods. When performing river discharge measurements, the main error source stems from the boat path. Due to the rapid flow in a flood condition, the boat path is not regular and this can cause errors in discharge measurements. Therefore, improvement of discharge measurements requires modification of boat path. As a result, the measurement errors in flood flow conditions are 12.3–21.8% before the modification of boat path, but 1.2–3.7% after the DMG modification of boat path. And it is considered that the modified discharges are very close to the observed discharge in the flood flow conditions. In this study, through the distance made good (DMG) modification of the boat path, a comprehensive discharge measurement with high accuracy can be achieved.
References
- 1 Lee J., Innovative approach to certify flood discharge amount in rivers, Proceedings of the 4th Hydrometry Symposium of Korea, Hydrological Survey Center, 2010, 80–86.
- 2
Lee C. J.,
Kim W.,
Kim C. Y., and
Kim D. G., Velocity and discharge measurement using ADCP, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association. (2005) 38, no. 10, 811–824, https://doi.org/10.3741/jkwra.2005.38.10.811.
10.3741/JKWRA.2005.38.10.811 Google Scholar
- 3 Morlock S. E., Evaluation of acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements of river discharge, USGS Water Resources Investigations Report, 1996, no. 95-4218.
- 4 Mueller D. S., Field assessment of acoustic Doppler based discharge measurements, Proceedings of the ASCE-IAHR Joint Conference on Hydraulic Measurements & Experimental Methods, July-August 2002, Estes Park, Colo, USA.
- 5 Oberg K., In search of easy-to-use methods for calibrating ADCP′s for velocity and discharge measurements, Proceedings of the ASCE-IAHR Joint Conference on Hydraulic Measurements & Experimental Methods, July-August 2002, Estes Park, Colo, USA.
- 6 Gartner J. W. and Ganju N. K., A preliminary evaluation of near-transducer velocities collected with low-blank acoustic Doppler current profiler, Proceedings of the Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods, ASCE-IAHR Joint Conference, August 2002, Estes Park, Colo, USA.
- 7
González-Castro J. A.,
Ansar M., and
Kellman O., Comparison of discharge estimates from ADCP transect data with estimates from fixed ADCP mean velocity data, Proceedings of the ASCE-IAHR Joint Conference on Hydraulic Measurements & Experimental Methods, July-August 2002, Reston, Va, USA, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1061/40655(2002)15.
10.1061/40655(2002)15 Google Scholar
- 8
Adler M. and
Nicodemus U., A new computer model for the evaluation of data from acoustic doppler current profilers (ADCP), Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part C: Solar, Terrestrial & Planetary Science. (2001) 26, no. 10–12, 711–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1464-1917(01)95014-7, 2-s2.0-0034754831.
10.1016/S1464-1917(01)95014-7 Google Scholar
- 9 Muste M., Yu K., and Spasojevic M., Practical aspects of ADCP data use for quantification of mean river flow characteristics; part I: moving-vessel measurements, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. (2004) 15, no. 1, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2003.09.001, 2-s2.0-0842301444.
- 10 Muste M., Yu K., Pratt T., and Abraham D., Practical aspects of ADCP data use for quantification of mean river flow characteristics; part II: fixed-vessel measurements, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. (2004) 15, no. 1, 17–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2003.09.002, 2-s2.0-0842284586.
- 11 Rennie C. D., Millar R. G., and Church M. A., Measurement of bed load velocity using an acoustic Doppler current profiler, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. (2002) 128, no. 5, 473–483, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2002)128:5(473), 2-s2.0-0036565955.
- 12 HolmesR. R.Jr. and Garcia M. H., Velocity and sediment concentration measurements over bedforms in sand-bed rivers, Proceedings of the Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods, ASCE-IAHR Joint Conference, August 2002, Estes Park, Colo, USA.
- 13 Nystrom E. A. and Gary W., ADCP measurement of suspended sediment in the tidal Hudson River, Peoceedings of the USGS Surface Water Conference, 2003, New York, NY, USA.
- 14 Parsons D. R., Jackson P. R., Czuba J. A., Engel F. L., Rhoads B. L., Oberg K. A., Best J. L., Mueller D. S., Johnson K. K., and Riley J. D., Velocity Mapping Toolbox (VMT): a processing and visualization suite for moving-vessel ADCP measurements, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. (2013) 38, no. 11, 1244–1260, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3367, 2-s2.0-84883449452.
- 15 Best J. L., Kostaschuk R. A., Peakall J., Villard P. V., and Franklin M., Whole flow field dynamics and velocity pulsing within natural sediment-laden underflows, Geology. (2005) 33, no. 10, 765–768, https://doi.org/10.1130/g21516.1, 2-s2.0-26844482928.
- 16
Parsons D. R.,
Best J. L.,
Orfeo O.,
Hardy R. J.,
Kostaschuk R. A., and
Lane S. N., Morphology and flow fields of three-dimensional dunes, Rio Paraná, Argentina: results from simultaneous multibeam echo sounding and acoustic Doppler current profiling, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. (2005) 110, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jf000231, 2-s2.0-34848864038.
10.1029/2004jf000231 Google Scholar
- 17 García C. M., Oberg K., and García M. H., ADCP measurements of gravity currents in the Chicago River, Illinois, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. (2007) 133, no. 12, 1356–1366, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1356), 2-s2.0-36448993300.
- 18 French J. R., Burningham H., and Benson T., Tidal and meteorological forcing of suspended sediment flux in a muddy mesotidal estuary, Estuaries and Coasts. (2008) 31, no. 5, 843–859, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-008-9072-5, 2-s2.0-52949143081.
- 19 Jackson P. R., García C. M., Oberg K. A., Johnson K. K., and García M. H., Density currents in the Chicago River: characterization, effects on water quality, and potential sources, Science of the Total Environment. (2008) 401, no. 1–3, 130–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.011, 2-s2.0-44749091271.
- 20 Lane S. N., Parsons D. R., Best J. L., Orfeo O., Kostaschuk R. A., and Hardy R. J., Causes of rapid mixing at a junction of two large rivers: Rio Paraná and Rio Paraguay Argentina, Journal of Geophysical Research. (2008) 113, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000745.
- 21 Bartholomä A., Kubicki A., Badewien T. H., and Flemming B. W., Suspended sediment transport in the German Wadden Sea-seasonal variations and extreme events, Ocean Dynamics. (2009) 59, no. 2, 213–225, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-009-0193-6, 2-s2.0-67349168276.
- 22 Kostaschuk R. A., Shugar D., Best J. L., Parsons D. R., Lane S. N., Hardy R. J., and Orfeo O., Suspended sediment transport and deposition over a dune: Rio Parana, Argentina, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. (2009) 34, no. 12, 1605–1611, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1847.
- 23 Shugar D. H., Kostaschuk R., Best J. L., Parsons D. R., Lane S. N., Orfeo O., and Hardy R. J., On the relationship between flow and suspended sediment transport over the crest of a sand dune, Río Paraná, Argentina, Sedimentology. (2010) 57, no. 1, 252–272, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2009.01110.x, 2-s2.0-72549102338.
- 24 Wright S. A. and Kaplinski M., Flow structures and sandbar dynamics in a canyon river during a controlled flood, Colorado River, Arizona, Journal of Geophysical Research. (2011) 116, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001442, 2-s2.0-79952540476.
- 25 Simpson M. R., Discharge measurements using a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler, Open-File Report, 2001, no. 01-1, USGS.
- 26 Gordon R. L., Acoustic measurement of river discharge, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. (1989) 115, no. 7, 925–936, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1989)115:7(925).
- 27 RD Instrument, WinRiver User′s Guide International Version, 2003, RD Instrument, San Diego, Calif, USA.
- 28 Lee J. and Kim J., Keeping discharge measurement accuracy of the moving boat method compared with the tagline method, Proceedings of the 5th Hydrometry Symposium of Korea Proceeding, 2011, Hydrological Survey Center, 225–230.
- 29 Everard N., ADCP v Current Meter. Comparison of Gauged Flows, 2011, Environment Agency.