Existence of the Mild Solution for Impulsive Semilinear Differential Equation
Abstract
We study the existence of solutions of impulsive semilinear differential equation in a Banach space X in which impulsive condition is not instantaneous. We establish the existence of a mild solution by using the Hausdorff measure of noncompactness and a fixed point theorem for the convex power condensing operator.
1. Introduction
In a few decades, impulsive differential equations have received much attention of researchers mainly due to its demonstrated applications in widespread fields of science and engineering such as biology, physics, control theory, population dynamics, medicine and so on. The real world processes and phenomena which are subjected during their development to short-term external inuences can be modeled as impulsive differential equation. Their duration is negligible compared to the total duration of the entire process or phenomena. Impulsive differential equations are an appropriate model to hereditary phenomena for which a delay argument arises in the modelling equations. To further study on impulsive differential equations, we refer to books [1, 2] and papers [3–11].
In [4], authors have introduced a new class of abstract impulsive differential equations in which impulses are not instantaneous and established the existence of solutions to the problem (1)–(3) with the assumption that operator A generates a C0-semigroup of bounded linear operators. In this system of (1)–(3), the impulses begin all of a sudden at the points ti and their proceeding continues on a finite time interval [ti, si] [5]. To concern the hemodynamical harmony of an individual we think about the following simplified situation. One can recommend a few intravenous sedates (insulin) on account of a decompensation (e.g., high or low level of glucose). Since the presentation of the medications in the bloodstream and the ensuing retention for the form are progressive and continuous processes, we can depict this circumstance as an impulsive activity which begins abruptly and stays animated on a finite time interval.
In the present work, our aim is to obtain results concerning the existence of mild solutions to problem (1)–(3) by using convex-power condensing operator and fixed point theorem for convex-power condensing operator Sun and Zhang [12].
The organization of the paper is as follows. We provide some basic definitions, Lemmas and theorems in Section 2 as “preliminaries.” We prove the existence of a mild solution for system (1) in Section 3 as “existence of mild solution.” In the last section, we present an example to illustrate the application of the abstract results.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we give some definitions, notations, theorems, and lemmas which will be used in later sections.
Let (X, ∥·∥) be a real Banach space. The symbol C([0, T0]; X) stands for the Banach space of all the continuous functions from [0, T0] into X equipped with the norm ∥z∥ = sup{∥z(s)∥, s ∈ [0, T0]} and L1([0, T0], X) stands for the space of X-valued Bochner integrable functions on [0, T0] endowed with the norm , f ∈ L1([0, T0], X).
- (H1)
the operator −A generates the equicontinuous semigroup and there exists a positive number M such that .
Lemma 1 (see [4].)A set is relatively compact in if and only if each set (j = 0,1, …, δ) is relatively compact in C([tj, tj+1], X) (j = 0,1, …, δ).
Now we present the following definition of mild solution.
Definition 2. A piecewise continuous function is said to be a mild solution of the (1)–(3) if u(0) = x0, u(t) = Gi(t, u(t)), for all t ∈ (ti, si], i = 1, …, δ, and
Next, we give the definition of the Hausdorff measure of noncompactness (MNC).
Definition 3 (see [14].)The Hausdorff measure of noncompactness β of the set E in Banach space X is the greatest lower bound of those ε > 0 for which the set E has in the space X a finite ε-net; that is,
Definition 4 (see [14].)The Kuratowski measure of noncompactness α defined on each bounded subset E of X as
Lemma 5. For any bounded set U, V ⊂ Y, where Y is a Banach space. Then, we have following results:
- (i)
β(U) = 0 if and only if U is precompact;
- (ii)
, where conv U and denote the convex hull and closure of U, respectively;
- (iii)
β(U) ⊂ β(V), when U ⊂ V;
- (iv)
β(U + V) ≤ β(U) + β(V), where U + V = {u + v : u ∈ U, v ∈ V};
- (v)
β(U ∪ V) ≤ max{β(U), β(V)};
- (vi)
β(λU) = λ · β(U), for any ;
- (vii)
If the map is continuous and satisfies the Lipschitsz condition with constant κ, then, we have that for any bounded subset , where Y and are Banach space.
Definition 6. A continuous and bounded map is called β-condensing if, for any noncompact bounded subset E ⊂ D,
To avoid confusion, we denote by β(·) the Hausdorff measure of noncompactness on set X, C([0, T0]; X) and .
Lemma 7 (see [14], Darbo-Sadovskii.)Let D ⊂ X be bounded, closed, and convex. If the continuous map is a β-contraction, then the map has a fixed point in D.
Definition 8 (see [12].)Let D ⊂ X be bounded, closed, and convex. A bounded and continuous operator is called a convex-power condensing operator if for any bounded nonprecompact subset E ⊂ D, there exist x0 ∈ D and an integer n0 > 0 such that
A β-convex-power condensing operator is β-condensing for n0 = 1. Therefore, it is clear that convex-power condensing operator is a generalization of the condensing operator.
Lemma 9 (see [12].)Let D ⊂ X be bounded, closed, and convex set. If the continuous map is β-convex-power condensing, then there exists a fixed point of map in D.
Lemma 10 (see [11], [14].)If E⊆C([0, T0]; X) is bounded, then β(E(t)) ≤ β(E), ∀t ∈ [0, T0], where E(t) = {u(t); u ∈ E}⊆X. In addition, if E is equicontinuous on [0, T0], then β(E(t)) is continuous on [0, T0] and
Lemma 11 (see [11].)If is bounded, then β(E(t)) ≤ β(E), ∀t ∈ [0, T0]. Besides, suppose the following conditions are satisfied:
- (1)
E is equicontinuous on [0, t1] and each (ti, si], [si, ti+1], i = 1, …, δ,
- (2)
E is equicontinuous at , i = 1, …, δ.
Lemma 12 (see [14].)If E ⊂ C([0, T0]; X) is bounded and equicontinuous, then β(E(t)) is continuous and
Lemma 13. Let be a sequence of functions in . Suppose that there exist satisfying ∥un(t)∥ ≤ γ(t) for almost all t ∈ [0, T0] and every n ≥ 1. Then, we have
Lemma 14. We assume that (H1) holds. Then the set , ∥u(ζ)∥ ≤ η(ζ) for a.e. ζ ∈ [0, T0]} is equicontinuous for all t ∈ [0, T0].
Proof. Let h be a positive constant such that 0 ≤ t < t + h ≤ T0. For , we have
Then from (17), (18), and (19) and the absolute continuity of integrals, we obtain that , ∥u(ζ)∥ ≤ η(ζ) for a.e. ζ ∈ [0, T0]} is equicontinuous for all t ∈ [0, T0].
3. Main Results
In this section, the existence of the mild solution of (1)–(3) under some specified conditions on Gi is established by using the measure of noncompactness and fixed point theorem for convex-power condensing operator.
- (HG)
The functions Gi (i = 1, …, δ) are compact and continuous.
- (HF)
F : [0, T] × X → X is a nonlinear function such that F satisfies the Carathèodary condition; that is, we have the following.
- (i)
F(τ, ·) : X → X is continuous for a.e. τ ∈ [0, T0].
- (ii)
For each x ∈ X, F(·, x):[0, T0] → X is strongly measurable. For any k > 0, there exists a function such that for u ∈ X
() - (iii)
There exists a constant such that for any bounded set B ⊂ X,
()
- (i)
- (HG1)
The functions Gi are continuous and there exist positive constants such that
() -
for all x, y ∈ X, τ ∈ (ti, si], (i = 1, …, δ).
- (Hk)
()
- (H)
.
Theorem 15. Suppose that (H1), (HG), (HF), and (Hk) are satisfied. Then, there exists at least one mild solution on [0, T0] for the problem (1)–(3).
Proof. We define the operator as , , for all t ∈ (ti, si] and
Secondly, we claim that , where . For each and t ∈ [0, t1], we get
Therefore, we conclude that ; that is, has values in Bk.
Now we show the equicontinuity of on [0, T0]. Since Gi(·) is compact, therefore it is obvious that is equicontinuous on (ti, si]. Assume t ∈ [0, t1]. Let h > 0 be a constant such that 0 < t < t + h ≤ t1 < T0. For u ∈ Bk, we get
For t ∈ [si, ti+1] we have
Set , where conv and denote the convex hull and closure of the convex hull, respectively. It can be shown easily that maps B into itself and B is equicontinuous on each [0, t1], (ti, si], [si, ti+1], i = 1,2, …, δ. Next we prove that is a convex-power condensing operator. We take u0 ∈ B and show that there exists a positive integer n0 such that
Further for t ∈ [si, ti+1], we have
We have that is equicontinuous on [0, T0] by Lemma 14. Therefore, from Lemma 11, we get
In the next result, the existence of the solution for problem (1)–(3) under Lipschitz conditions of Gi is established by using Darbo-Sadovskii’s fixed point theorem.
Theorem 16. Suppose that assumptions (H1), (HF), (HG1), and (H) hold. Then, the impulsive problem (1)–(3) has at least one mild solution on [0, T0].
Proof. Firstly, we decompose the map such that , where , i = 0,1, 2, …, δ, j = 1,2, are defined as
4. Example
Next we have that is a mild solution of the problem (55).
Case 1. We take
Case 2. Take f(t, w(t, x)) = f1(t)w(t, x) and gi(t, w(t, x)) = (1/(5 + αit3))[|w(t, x)|/(1+|w(t, x)|)], ; here, is a bounded and continuous function and αi > 0.
For t ∈ (si, ti+1], i = 1, …, δ and , we have
Thus, (HG1) holds. Then by Theorem 16, problem (55) has at least a mild solution.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the referee for valuable comments and suggestions. The work of the first author is supported by the University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India, New Delhi.