Volume 19, Issue 6 314910 pp. e154-e158
Open Access

Does Low-Level Laser Therapy Enhance The Efficacy of Intravenous Regional Anesthesia?

Sholeh Nesioonpour

Corresponding Author

Sholeh Nesioonpour

Pain Research Center Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz, Iran , ajums.ac.ir

Department of Anesthesiology Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz, Iran , ajums.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Reza Akhondzadeh

Reza Akhondzadeh

Pain Research Center Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz, Iran , ajums.ac.ir

Department of Anesthesiology Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz, Iran , ajums.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Soheila Mokmeli

Soheila Mokmeli

Canadian Optic & Laser Production Center British Columbia, Canada , col-center.ca

Search for more papers by this author
Shahnam Moosavi

Shahnam Moosavi

Department of Orthopedics Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz, Iran , ajums.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Mandana Mackie

Mandana Mackie

Pain Research Center Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz, Iran , ajums.ac.ir

Department of Anesthesiology Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz, Iran , ajums.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author
Morteza Naderan

Morteza Naderan

Farzan Clinical Research Institute Tehran, Iran , cro.farzaninstitute.com

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 January 2014
Citations: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) is limited by pain resulting from the application of tourniquets and postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of low-level laser therapy added to IVRA for improving pain related to surgical fixation of distal radius fractures.

METHODS: The present double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial involved 48 patients who were undergoing surgical fixation of distal radius fractures. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (n=24), who received 808 nm laser irradiation as 4 J/point for 20 s over ipsilateral three nerve roots in the cervical region corresponding to C5–C8 vertebrae, and 808 nm laser irradiation as 0.1 J/cm2 for 5 min in a tangential scanning mode over the affected extremity; or a control group (n=24), who underwent the same protocol and timing of laser probe application with the laser switched off. Both groups received the same IVRA protocol using 2% lidocaine.

RESULTS: The mean visual analogue scale scores were significantly lower in the laser-assisted group than in the lidocaine-only group on all measurements during and after operation (P<0.05). The mean time to the first need for fentanyl administration during the operation was longer in the laser group (P=0.04). The total amount of fentanyl administered to patients was significantly lower in the laser-assisted group (P=0.003). The laser group needed significantly less pethidine for pain relief (P=0.001) and at a later time (P=0.002) compared with the lidocaine-only group. There was no difference between the groups in terms of mean arterial pressure and heart rate.

CONCLUSION: The addition of gallium-aluminum-arsenide laser irradiation to intravenous regional anesthesia is safe, and reduces pain during and after the operation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.