Volume 2013, Issue 1 632364
Review Article
Open Access

Development of Solar Electricity Supply System in India: An Overview

Sandeep Kumar Gupta

Corresponding Author

Sandeep Kumar Gupta

Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India iitk.ac.in

Search for more papers by this author
Raghubir Singh Anand

Raghubir Singh Anand

Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India iitk.ac.in

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 May 2013
Citations: 16
Academic Editor: Paulo Fernandes

Abstract

Solar electricity supply system has grown at very rapid pace in India during the last few years. A total of 1047.84 MW of grid connected photovoltaic projects and 160.8 MW of off-grid systems have been commissioned under different policy mechanisms between January 2010 and November 2012. It is observed that solar capacity development has achieved a greater height under state policies (689.81 MW) than others. A study is made in this paper of various national and state level schemes, incentives, packages, instruments, and different mechanisms to promote solar photovoltaics and its effectiveness.

1. Introduction

The changing lifestyle with rapid industrialization has made electricity an indispensable and essential commodity over the years. During the last few decades, increasing prices of electricity with increasing demand and decreasing fossil fuel reserves have raised many concerns for policy makers, investors, and customers. Moreover, existing supply chain also poses a challenge of carbon foot print due to its dependency on fossil fuels like coal and oil for electricity generation [13].

To alleviate the concern, policy makers across the world have been looking for some sustainable and feasible alternative input energy sources for electricity generation. They found many options like nuclear, wind, solar, hydro, biomass, tidal, geothermal, and so forth [3, 4]. However, literature supports solar energy as it is the most ready and green option available across the world [5]. The report published by Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India (GoI) [6] states that

The solar energy received by the earth is more than 15,000 times the world’s commercial energy consumption and over 100 times the world’s known coal, gas and oil reserves. And this energy is readily available during the day for anyone to tap and that too free and without any constraint.

Initially used to supply electricity to satellites due to its high generation cost, solar technologies and its potential have improved enough to supply electricity not only to remote locations but also to supplement the national grid power at multimegawatt levels [7].

In India, wind- and solar-based systems have been getting good response under the conducive environment created through different policy measures. In this paper, our focus is only on the development of solar-based electricity supply systems. There are different kinds of support measures to promote grid connected and off-grid solar systems. We discuss these in detail in the subsequent sections.

2. India’s Potential for Solar Energy

India is located in the northern hemisphere, lying between latitudes 8°4′N and 37°6′N and longitudes 68°7′E and 97°25′E; the country is divided into almost two equal halves by the Tropic of Cancer (23°30′N). The southern half which coincides with peninsular India lies in the tropical zone, while the northern half belongs to the subtropical zone.

Due to its locational advantage, on average, the country experiences 250 to 300 sunny days per year and receives an average hourly radiation of 200 MW/km2. The annual global radiation varies from 1600 to 2200 kWh/m2 [6], which is typical of the tropical and subtropical regions. NREL recently released 10 km resolution solar resource maps for India based on the SUNY satellite. Figure 1 shows the annual average direct normal irradiance (DNI) across India, which illustrates that most areas of the country have greater than 5 kWh/m2/day of DNI. This image shows the areas of highest resource occurring in the state of Gujarat, Rajasthan, and the high-elevation Himalayan region. Figure 1 also shows large areas with annual average DNI greater than 5.5 kWh/m2/day in the state of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, and Maharashtra and smaller land areas with similar resources in several other states. This area could be further increased by the use of building-integrated PV. Though large-scale CSP has not yet been deployed in India; one study has estimated that this technology alone could generate 11,000 TWh per year for India (Table 1). In addition, it also offers huge potential for decentralized distributed electricity supply system, which can address the problem of electricity to a remote location with less/lower transmission losses.

Table 1. India’s estimated land area suitable for CSP development and generation potential [28].

DNI class  

(kWh/m²/year)

Land area suitable for CSP development (km²) CSP generating potential (TWh/year)
2,000–2,099 83,522 7,893
2,100–2,199 11,510 1,140
2,200–2,299 5,310 550
2,300–2,399 7,169 774
2,400–2,499 3,783 426
2,500–2,599 107 13
2,600–2,699 976 119
2,700–2,800+ 120 15
  
Total 112,497 10,930
Details are in the caption following the image
India’s DNI resource at 10 km resolution (source: NREL [8]).

In spite of huge solar energy potential, the portfolio of RE has developed in a very unique way in India, though, lately introduced wind power technology has left behind all the traditional RE technologies such as biomass, solar power, and SHP as shown in Figure 2. It also demonstrates that solar power has the maximum untapped potential as 97.9% of estimated potential of 50000 MW. And the overall untapped potential of 81.3% seeks immediate attention of policy makers for exploiting this available RE resource in a very efficient and effective manner to overcome the problem of electricity shortage.

Details are in the caption following the image
Development of overall RE portfolio as on 31st of August, 2012 (source: MNRE [9]).

3. Development of Solar Electricity System under Different Policy Measures in India

Government of India has recognized the importance of solar energy as one of the sustainable sources of energy under National Action Plan for Climate Change (NAPCC). NAPCC aims to derive 15% of its energy requirements from RE sources by the year 2020 [10]. Various policy measures, such as preferential tariff or fixed tariff or feed-in tariff (FiT), RPO, excise duty exemption, and soft loan, have been implemented to achieve the above-mentioned target.

RPO is one of the tools which have been implemented by many countries to achieve their ambitious RE goals [11, 12]. In India, state electricity regulatory commissions (SERCs) determine the obligated entities, which generally include distribution companies, captive consumers, and any open-access users. Then these SERCs fix a certain proportion of electricity consumption as RPO targets for the above-mentioned obligated entities. Due to significant cost difference in solar and nonsolar RE technologies [13], most of the states have come up with their separate targets for solar electricity, as shown in Table 2. As per the National Tariff Policy, it is envisaged that the targets for solar RPO shall be 0.25% by 2012-2013 extending to 3% by 2022 [14], but only the state of Bihar has followed it in its solar policy the way it is expected.

Table 2. State-wise solar RPO.
State RPO (%)
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022
Andhra Pradesh 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Arunachal Pradesh No regulation issued for RPO by the power department
Assam 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
Bihar 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50 3.00
Chhattisgarh 0.25 0.50
Delhi 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35
JERC (Goa and UT) 0.30 0.40
Gujarat 0.50 1.00
Haryana 0.00 0.05 0.75
Himachal Pradesh 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.00 3.00
Jammu and Kashmir 0.10 0.25
Jharkhand 0.50 1.00
Karnataka 0.25
Kerala 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Madhya Pradesh 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Maharashtra 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.50
Manipur 0.25 0.25
Mizoram 0.25 0.25
Meghalaya 0.30 0.40
Nagaland 0.25 0.25
Orissa 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
Punjab 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.19
Rajasthan 0.50 0.75 1.00
Sikkim No regulation issued for RPO by the power department
Tamil Nadu 0.05
Tripura 0.10 0.10
Uttarakhand 0.03 0.05
Uttar Pradesh 0.50 1.00
West Bengal 0.25 0.30 0.40 0.50
  • Source: SERCs order on RPO regulations [29].

A study conducted by MNRE shows that most of the states could not install capacity of solar system as per their RPO compliance requirement for the year 2012-2013 as on 12th of November 2012 (Table 3). The states like Uttar Pradesh (422.7 MW), Haryana (172.2 MW), Maharashtra (151.3 MW), and so forth, are far away from their RPO target. However, states of Gujarat (488.3 MW), Rajasthan (82.3 MW), and Karnataka (61.1 MW) have already surpassed their RPO requirement. Other states like Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Punjab, and Uttarakhand may soon exceed their targets.

Table 3. Expected solar RPO requirement and compliance for 2012-2013 [30].
State

Projected demand* 

(MU)

Solar RPO target 

(2012-2013)

Solar RPO target (2012-2013) Capacity required for meeting solar RPO Total capacity tied up as on 31.11.2012* Installed capacity as on 31.11.2012 Gap to be fulfilled in 2012-2013
2012-2013 % MU MW MW MW MW
Andhra Pradesh 98,956 0.25 247.39 148.6 75.5 23.75 73.1
Assam 6,810 0.15 10.21 6.1 5 1.14
Bihar 15,272 0.75 114.54 68.8 0 68.82
Chhattisgarh 21,174 0.50 105.87 63.6 29 4.00 34.61
Delhi 28,598 0.15 42.90 25.8 2.525 2.53 23.25
JERC (Goa and UT) 12,860 0.40 51.44 30.9 1.7 1.69 29.21
Gujarat 79,919 1.00 799.19 480.2 968.5 689.81 (488.3)
Haryana 40,167 0.75 301.25 181.0 8.8 7.80 172.2
Himachal Pradesh 8,647 0.25 21.62 13.0 0 13.0
Jammu and Kashmir 14,573 0.25 36.43 21.9 0 21.8
Jharkhand 6,696 1.00 66.96 40.2 36 16.00 4.2
Karnataka 65,152 0.25 162.88 97.9 159 14.00 (61.1)
Kerala 21,060 0.25 52.65 31.6 0.025 0.03 31.6
Madhya Pradesh 53,358 0.60 320.15 192.3 213.21 7.25 (20.9)
Maharashtra 150,987 0.25 377.47 226.8 75.5 21.00 151.3
Manipur 608 0.25 1.52 0.9 0 0.9
Mizoram 418 0.25 1.04 0.6 0 0.6
Meghalaya 2,154 0.40 8.62 5.2 0 5.2
Nagaland 596 0.25 1.49 0.9 0 0.9
Orissa 24,284 0.15 36.43 21.9 54 13.00 (32.1)
Punjab 48,089 0.07 33.66 20.2 51.825 9.33 (31.6)
Rajasthan 55,057 0.75 412.93 248.1 330.4 201.15 (82.3)
Tamil Nadu 91,441 0.05 45.72 27.5 18.105 17.05 9.4
Tripura 1,010 0.10 1.01 0.6 0 0.6
Uttarakhand 11,541 0.05 5.77 3.5 5.05 5.05 (1.6)
Uttar Pradesh 85,902 1.00 859.02 516.1 93.375 12.38 422.7
West Bengal 41,896 0.25 104.74 62.9 52.05 2.05 10.9
  
Total 2,537.2 2,179.59 1,047.84
  • Source: CEA base data for 2011-2012 and escalated for 2012-2013 based on 18th EPS escalation rates for the same period; *based on the data provided by NVVN, state agencies, and project developers. Italic numbers are the surplus capacity built-up.

However, when annual solar capacity requirement for RPO compliance is analyzed (Table 4), it is found that India would need ~34,000 MW of solar capacity to achieve the target of 3% contribution from solar electricity till 2022. It means that set RPO targets are not sufficient to have a solar energy dominant RE development scenario [15]. The policy makers expect to fill this gap with states’ solar energy promotion policies and programmes. Most of the states have come up with their solar energy specific policies which are discussed in detail in subsequent sections.

Table 4. Solar power capacity requirement by 2022 [31] and [15]#.
Year

Energy demand (MU)* 

(A)

Solar RPO (%) 

(B)

Solar energy requirement (MU) 

for RPO compliance 

(A × B)

Solar capacity requirement for RPO compliance 

(MW)

Solar capacity requirement for solar dominant scenario 

(MW)#

2011-2012 953,919 0.25 2,385 1,433 514
2012-2013 1,022,287 0.25 2,556 1,536 2414
2013-2014 1,095,555 0.50 5,478 3,291 5414
2014-2015 1,174,074 0.75 8,806 5,291 8414
2015-2016 1,258,221 1.00 12,582 7,560 12414
2016-2017 1,348,399 1.25 16,855 10,127 17490
2017-2018 1,443,326 1.75 25,258 15,176 22490
2018-2019 1,544,936 2.25 34,761 20,885 28490
2019-2020 1,653,700 2.50 41,343 24,839 35490
2020-2021 1,770,120 2.75 48,678 29,247
2021-2022 1,894,736 3.00 56,842 34,152
  • Note: *based on the National Electricity Plan for Generation January 2012.
  • #Source: WISE, Pune [15].

As far as state-wise installation is concerned, Table 5 clearly demonstrates that states of Gujarat (65.83%) and Rajasthan (19.20%) have major share in total installed capacity (1047.87 MW). Other states like Andhra Pradesh (23.75 MW) and Maharashtra (21.00 MW) also have significant contribution. However, it is quite remarkable that out of 26 states 19 have shown their presence in the class of solar India in spite of relatively high generation cost (Table 5). It is expected that when cost will reduce with increasing capacity, states which have low or no capacity may contribute significantly.

Table 5. State-wise distribution of installed solar capacity as on 31st of November, 2012 [32].
Sr. no. States Installed capacity (MW)
JNNSM State policy RPSSGP/GBI scheme REC Other Total % of total
1 Andhra Pradesh 12.00 9.75 2.00 23.75 2.27
2 Arunachal Pradesh 0.03 0.03 0.00
3 Chhattisgarh 4.00 4.00 0.38
4 Delhi 2.53 2.53 0.24
5 Goa and UT 1.69 1.69 0.16
6 Gujarat 689.81 689.81 65.83
7 Haryana 7.80 7.80 0.74
8 Jharkhand 16.00 16.00 1.53
9 Karnataka 5.00 9.00 14.00 1.34
10 Kerala 0.03 0.03 0.00
11 Madhya Pradesh 5.25 2.00 7.25 0.69
12 Maharashtra 11.00 5.00 5.00 21.00 2.00
13 Orissa 5.00 7.00 1.00 13.00 1.24
14 Punjab 2.00 6.00 1.33 9.33 0.89
15 Rajasthan 137.50 10.00 2.75 50.90 201.15 19.20
16 Tamil Nadu 5.00 5.00 7.05 17.05 1.63
17 Uttarakhand 5.00 0.05 5.05 0.48
18 Uttar Pradesh 5.00 7.00 0.38 12.38 1.18
19 West Bengal 2.05 2.05 0.20
  
Total 182.50 689.81 87.80 4.75 83.01 1047.87

Moreover, Table 6 shows that the installed capacity (1047.87 MW) under various policy measures is dominated by state policies (65.83%) which is in particular the success mantra of state of Gujarat (689.81 MW). The peculiarity of theses installation scenarios should be taken into account while devising the policy for future.

Table 6. Policy-wise distribution of installed solar capacity as on 31st of November, 2012 [32].
Projects Capacity (MW) % of total
Projects under JNNSM 182.5 17.42
Projects under the state policy 689.81 65.83
Projects under RPSSGP/GBI scheme 87.8 8.38
Projects under REC scheme 4.75 0.45
Other projects 83.01 7.92
  
Total 1047.87

3.1. Development under JNNSM

To achieve the long-term goal of NAPCC, Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM) was launched on 11th January, 2010, with an objective to maximize generation of power from solar energy. Thus, it also constitutes a major contribution by India to the global effort to meet the challenges of climate change. The immediate aim of the mission is to focus on setting up an enabling environment for solar technology penetration in the country both at a centralized and decentralized level [16].

Table 7 shows JNNSM’s targets with time line. The first phase (up to March 2013) focuses on promoting off-grid systems including hybrid systems to serve the population which is located in remote areas. For the first phase modest targets were set under the expectation that this development would bring down costs under enabling framework and support for entrepreneurs to develop markets. This cost reduction would help in creating conducive environment to achieve the ambitious targets of the second phase (2013–17) and third phase (2017–2022).

Table 7. JNNSM targets with timeline [16].
2010–2013 2013–2017 2017–2022
Utility grid power including roof top (MW) 1000–2000 4000–10000 20000
Off-grid solar applications (MW) 200 1000 2000
Solar collectors (sq. m) 7 million 15 million 20 million

To attract the investors, JNNSM devises various incentive instruments such as RE Voucher/Stamp, Capital Subsidy, Interest Subsidy, Viability Gap Funding (VGF), and Green Energy Bonds. However, the capacity built is only 182.5 MW which is concentrated around few states like Rajasthan (137.5 MW), Andhra Pradesh (12 MW), Maharashtra (11 MW), and so forth (refer: Table 5) under first phase (as on 31st of November, 2012). This seeks immediate attention of policy makers for reviewing their implementation strategy.

Recently announced JNNSM second phase policy mandate [17] includes the learning from the initial setback. It gives more weightage to state scheme (5400 MW) than central scheme (3600 MW) for target capacity installation (Table 8). It also focuses more on VGF for incentivizing the projects.

Table 8. Technology-wise capacity targets under JNNSM Phase II (MW) [17].
Segment Share (%) Capacity Central scheme State scheme
Solar PV 70 6300 2520 3780
Solar thermal 30 2700 1080 1620
  
Total 10000 3600 5400

To make the efforts more concentrated and specific, in a recent initiative, MNRE has given approval to the development of 54 solar cities [18]. As of now (January 21, 2013), 8 master plans have been approved for eight cities—Agra and Moradabad from Uttar Pradesh; Thane and Kalyan-Dombivli from Maharashtra; Indore from Madhya Pradesh; Kohima from Nagaland; and Aizawl from Mizoram and Chandigarh [18]. Thus by reducing scale, MNRE expects better solar capacity development in the near future.

3.2. Development under REC

The REC mechanism is a market-based instrument to promote renewable sources of energy and development of market in electricity, leading to the sustainable development of the country. REC mechanism has been designed to address the mismatch between availability of renewable electricity and the requirement of the obligated entities to meet their RPO by purchasing green attributes of RE remotely located in the form of REC. The implementation issues as well as institutional framework for India have been discussed in detail by Singh [19, 20] and MNRE [21]. Goyal and Jha [22] discussed in detail the framework to promote RE through a framework which puts into place Renewable Purchase Obligation (RPO) mechanism.

In India, RECs trading began in March 2011, on the platform of Indian Energy Exchange (IEX) and Power Exchange of India (PXI). Though during initial period it could not perform as per expectation, but the performance has been improving during the last few months, as shown in Table 10. But still due to large unmet demand, solar REC price has been hovering around the forbearance price (Table 9) of Rs. 13400/REC. However, a recent notification by MNRE [23] which clarified state agencies for allowing use of solar REC to nonsolar RPO if it is above its minimum prescribed limit may increase the liquidity of solar REC market which is expected to decrease the price of it.

Table 9. Floor and forbearance prices for RECs (Rs.2/REC)*.
REC prices till 2011 REC prices for 2012–2015
Forbearance price 17000 13400
Floor price 12000 9300
  • *1 REC = 1 MWh.
  • 21 USD = INR 54.5 as of September 20, 2012.
Table 10. Solar REC trading details from IEX [33].
Year Month

Buy bids 

(REC)

Sell bids 

(REC)

Cleared volume 

(REC)

Cleared price 

(Rs/REC)

No. of participants
February 11 1
March 30,001 3
April
May
June
2011 July
August 1 1
September 7 4
October 1 1
November 43 2
December 495
  
January 2,635 10
February 582 9
March 5,782 26
April 289 9
May 1,637 149 5 13,000 16
2012 June 9,489 541 336 12,750 17
July 8,554 419 93 12,800 11
August 1,728 310 129 12,850 13
September 1,317 1,094 735 12,500 23
October 1,263 864 820 12,680 19
November 1,458 758 733 12,720 21
December 1,608 977 931 12,620 36

Though the capacity installed under this mechanism is only 4.75 MW (Table 6), but capacity registered under this mechanism has reached close to 20 MW [24]. And the present high price of REC holds bright prospects for this newly launched incentive scheme.

3.3. Development under RPSSGP/GBI Scheme

Rooftop Photovoltaic (PV) and Small Solar Power Generation Programme (RPSSGP) is a Generation-Based Incentives (GBIs) programme of the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) under the JNNSM for rooftop and other small solar plants. As of now, the installed capacity of 87.8 MW, which is well distributed across many states (Table 5), has been developed under this scheme. Due to limited access to smart grid/net metering connectivity, this incentive has not yet been harnessed to its fullest by the developers.

3.4. Development under the State Policy

Most of the states have been using preferential tariffs as a tool to promote solar energy in their states (Table 11). But, due to huge financial burden, states of Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh have switched their focus from preferential tariff to REC market in their recently announced solar policies [25, 26]. Moreover, state of Gujarat has also made provision for sharing Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) benefits to developers, starting from 100% in first year after commissioning, and thereafter reducing it by 10% every year till the sharing becomes equal (50 : 50) between the developers and the consumers [25].

Table 11. Compilation of recently declared preferential tariffs for solar PV and solar thermal technologies [27].
State/centre Solar PV Solar thermal
Tariff (Rs/kWh) Control period Tariff (Rs/kWh) Control period
CERC
  • Lev-10.39
  • AD-1.04
  • After AD-9.35
FY 2012-2013
  • Lev-12.46
  • AD-1.24
  • After AD-11.22
FY 2012-2013
  
Andhra Pradesh
  • 17.91 (without AD)
  • 14.95 (with AD)
2010-2011 and 2011-2012
  • 15.31 (without AD)
  • 12.85 (with AD)
2010-2011 and 2012-2013
  
Bihar
  • 10.9 (without AD)
  • 09.85 (with AD)
Up to March 31, 2015 commissioning
  • 13.11 (without AD)
  • 11.87 (with AD)
Up to March 31, 2015 commissioning
  
Gujarat
  • For MW scale plants:  
  • Jan 2012–March 2013: 10.37 (without AD), 09.28 (with AD),
  • FY 2013-2014: 9.64 (without AD), 8.63 (with AD),
  • FY 2014-2015: 8.97 (without AD), 8.03 (with AD)
  • For kW scale plants  
  • Jan 2012–March 2013: 12.44 (without AD), 11.14 (with AD),
  • FY 2013-2014: 11.57 (without AD), 10.36 (with AD),
  • FY 2014-2015: 10.76 (without AD), 9.63 (with AD)
Jan 29, 2012 to March 31, 2015
  • 12.91 (without AD)
  • 11.55 (with AD)
Jan 29, 2012 to March 31, 2015
  
Haryana
  • 9.18 (SPV crystalline)
  • 8.90 (SPV thin film)
3 years (till FY 2013–FY 2015) 12.17 3 years (till FY 2013–FY 2015)
  
Karnataka 14.5 (including rooftop and small solar PV plants) Up to March 31, 2013 commissioning 11.35 Up to March 31, 2013 commissioning
  
Kerala 15.18 (including incentives) For projects commissioned before Dec. 31, 2009
  
Madhya Pradesh
  • 10.44 (capacity > 2 MW),
  • 10.70 (capacity up to 2 MW)
Aug 2012 to March 2014 12.65 Aug 2012 to March 2014
  
Maharashtra
  • Lev-11.16 (11.66-RT and SSPGP)
  • AD-1.65 (1.65)
  • After AD-9.51 (10.01)
FY 2010–2014 (5 years from the date of commencement)
  • Lev-13.44
  • AD-1.97
  • After AD-11.47
FY 2010–2014 (5 years from the date of commencement)
  
Orissa
  • Lev-17.80
  • AD-3.03
  • After AD-14.77
Plant commissioned in FY (2012-2013) onwards
  • Lev-14.73
  • AD-2.41
  • After AD-12.32
Plant commissioned in FY (2012-2013) onwards
  
Punjab
  • Lev-10.39
  • AD-1.04
  • After AD-9.35
FY 2012–2016 (5 years from the notification of order)
  • Lev-12.46
  • AD-1.24
  • After AD-11.22
FY 2012–2016
  
Rajasthan
  • 9.63 (plant commissioned by 31st of March 2014)
  • with AD-10.45
  • 9.63 (roof top and SSPG commissioned by 31st March 2014)
  • 11.95 (without AD)
  • With AD-10.45
  • 11.95 (small solar thermal power gen commissioned by 31st of March 2015)
FY 2012-2013
  
Tamil Nadu
  • Lev-18.45
  • AD-4.11
  • After AD-14.34
FY 2010-2011 (till 31/05/12)
  • Lev-15.51
  • AD-3.35
  • After AD-12.16
FY 2010-2011 (till 31/05/12)
  
Uttarakhand
  • Lev-17.70
  • AD-1.65
  • After AD-16.05
FY 2009–2012 (3 years from the commencement of these regulations)
  • Lev-12.95
  • AD-1.15
  • After AD-11.80
FY 2009–2012 (3 years from the commencement of these regulations)
  
Uttar Pradesh 15 (commissioned by Dec 2011, not covered under GOI incentive scheme) FY 2010–2014 (5 years) 13 (commissioned by Dec 2011, not covered under GOI incentive scheme) FY 2010–2014 (5 years)
  
West Bengal
  • 10 (capacity ranging 100 KW to 2 MW availing GBI)
  • 10 (grid connected plant not eligible for any incentive and commissioned up to 2012-2013)
  • 10 (projects commissioned after FY 2012 till FY 2015)
FY 2013–2017 (5 years) NA NA

Likewise several states have also come up with many other encouraging policies like Accelerated Depreciation (AD) on capital investment, soft loan for financing, reduced or no transmission and wheeling charges, no cross subsidy surcharge for open-access transactions, reduced or no intra-state Availability-Based Tariff (ABT), nonapplicability of merit order dispatch principles, exemption from electricity tax, tax concessions, refund of stamp duty and registration charges paid for land purchase, single window clearance, faster power evacuation approval, and so forth [2527].

4. Conclusion

The study concludes that though JNNSM first phase could not perform up to the expectations, the state level policies have been doing well to fill the gap. The recently announced JNNSM Phase II target composition of 3600 MW for central and 5400 MW for states, changes in policies and schemes in light of the experience of Phase I, and development of 54 solar cities are likely to impact the National Solar Mission performance and enhance the overall visibility of solar-based electricity generation and utilization.

Abbreviations

  • CDM:
  • Clean development mechanism
  • CSP:
  • Concentrated solar power
  • DNI:
  • Direct normal irradiance
  • FiT:
  • Feed-in tariff
  • GBIs:
  • Generation-based incentives
  • GoI:
  • Government of India
  • IEX:
  • Indian energy exchange
  • IMD:
  • Indian meteorological department
  • JNNSM:
  • Jawaharlal Nehru national solar mission
  • MNRE:
  • Ministry of new and renewable energy
  • NAPCC:
  • National action plan for climate change
  • NREL:
  • National renewable energy laboratory
  • PV:
  • Photovoltaic
  • PXI:
  • Power exchange of India
  • RE:
  • Renewable energy
  • REC:
  • Renewable energy certificate
  • RPO:
  • Renewable purchase obligation
  • RPSSGP:
  • Rooftop photovoltaic and small solar power generation programme
  • SERC:
  • State electricity regulatory commission
  • SHP:
  • Small hydropower
  • VGF:
  • Viability gap funding.
    • The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.