An Opial-Type Inequality on Time Scales
Abstract
We establish some new Opial-type inequalities involving higher order delta derivatives on time scales. These extend some known results in the continuous case in the literature and provide new estimates in the setting of time scales.
1. Introduction
Opial′s inequality appeared for the first time in 1960 in [1] and has been receiving continual attention throughout the years (cf., e.g., [2–7]). The inequality together with its numerous generalizations, extensions, and discretizations has been playing a fundamental role in the study of the existence and uniqueness properties of solutions of initial and boundary value problems for differential equations as well as difference equations [8, 9]. Two excellent surveys on these inequalities can be found in [10, 11].
In 1960, Opial established the following integral inequality.
Theorem A (see [1]). If f ∈ C1[0, h] satisfies f(0) = f(h) = 0 and f(x) > 0 for all x ∈ (0, h), then
Shortly after the publication of Opial’s paper, Olech provided a modified version of Theorem A. His result is stated in the following.
Theorem B (see [12]). If f is absolutely continuous on [0, h] with f(0) = 0, then
The equality in (2) holds if and only if f(x) = cx, where c is a constant.
The first natural extension of Opial’s inequality (1) involving higher order derivatives x(n)(s) (n ≥ 1) is embodied in the following.
Theorem C (see [10]). Let x(t) ∈ C(n)[0, a] be such that x(i)(0) = 0, 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 (n ≥ 1). Then the following inequality holds:
In 1997, Alzer [13] considered Opial-type inequalities which involve higher-order derivatives of two functions. These generalize earlier results of Agarwal and Pang [14].
In this paper, we consider the Opial-type inequality which involves higher-order delta derivatives of two functions on time scales. Our results in special cases yield some of the recent results on Opial’s inequality and provide some new estimates on such types of inequalities in this general setting.
2. Main Results
Let 𝕋 be a time scale; that is, 𝕋 is an arbitrary nonempty closed subset of real numbers. Let a, b ∈ 𝕋. We suppose that the reader is familiar with the basic features of calculus on time scales for dynamic equations. Otherwise one can consult Bohner and Peterson’s book [15] for most of the materials needed.
We first quote the following elementary lemma and the delta time scales Taylor formula.
Lemma 1 (see [16]). Let a ≥ 0, p ≥ 1 be real constants. Then
Lemma 2 (see [17].)Let the set of functions that are m times differentiable with rd-continuous derivatives on 𝕋, m ∈ ℕ. Then for any a, b ∈ 𝕋 and t ∈ [a, b]∩𝕋,
Our main results are given in the following theorems.
Theorem 3. Let 0 ≤ r ≤ s < t, s > 0, t > 1 be real numbers, and let m, k be integers with 0 ≤ k ≤ m − 1. Let p > 0 and q ≥ 0 be measurable functions on Υ : = [a, b]∩𝕋. Further, let with , and let be absolutely continuous on Υ such that the integrals and exist. Then one has
Proof. Since , we obtain from Taylor′s theorem that for all x ∈ Υ,
From (9) and Hölder′s inequality we get
Let
Then we have
So (10) together with (12) implies
Similarly, we get
Recall the elementary inequalities
Let β = r/s. Since α = s/t ∈ (0, 1) and F is nondecreasing, from (14)–(16), we have
By Lemma 1, we get
From (18) and (19), we conclude
The proof is complete.
Theorem 4. Let r ≥ 0, s > 0, s < t, t > 1 be real numbers, and let m, k be integers with 0 ≤ k ≤ m − 1. Let p > 0, and q ≥ 0 be measurable functions on Υ : = [a, b]∩𝕋. Further, let f, with let , and be absolutely continuous on Υ such that the integrals and exist. Then one has
Theorem 6. Let , Υ : = [a, b]∩𝕋 be such that , 0 ≤ k ≤ m − 1, let be absolutely continuous on Υ, and let . Then
Proof. From the hypotheses, we have
Multiplying (26) by and using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain
Integrating both sides over x from a to b and using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we observe
The proof is complete.
Theorem 7. Let p(x) > 0, q(x) be nonnegative and measurable on Υ = [a, b]∩𝕋, and let be such that , 0 ≤ k ≤ m − 1. If is absolutely continuous on Υ, then for r > 1, rk > 0, and any 0 ≤ rm < r,
Proof. Following the hypotheses, it is easy to see that (26) holds. By using Hölder′s inequality with indices r and r/(r − 1), we obtain
Thus for rk > 0,
Integrating both sides of (33) from a to b and applying Hölder′s inequality with indices r/rm and r/(r − rm), we obtain
Acknowledgments
The first author′s research was supported by NSF of China (11071054), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (A2011205012). The second author′s research was partially supported by an HKU URG grant.