Volume 2013, Issue 1 534083
Research Article
Open Access

An Opial-Type Inequality on Time Scales

Qiao-Luan Li

Corresponding Author

Qiao-Luan Li

College of Mathematics and Information Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China hebtu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Wing-Sum Cheung

Wing-Sum Cheung

Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong hku.hk

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 March 2013
Academic Editor: Allan Peterson

Abstract

We establish some new Opial-type inequalities involving higher order delta derivatives on time scales. These extend some known results in the continuous case in the literature and provide new estimates in the setting of time scales.

1. Introduction

Opial′s inequality appeared for the first time in 1960 in [1] and has been receiving continual attention throughout the years (cf., e.g., [27]). The inequality together with its numerous generalizations, extensions, and discretizations has been playing a fundamental role in the study of the existence and uniqueness properties of solutions of initial and boundary value problems for differential equations as well as difference equations [8, 9]. Two excellent surveys on these inequalities can be found in [10, 11].

In 1960, Opial established the following integral inequality.

Theorem A (see  [1]). If fC1[0, h] satisfies f(0) = f(h) = 0 and f(x) > 0 for all x ∈ (0,   h), then

()

Shortly after the publication of Opial’s paper, Olech provided a modified version of Theorem A. His result is stated in the following.

Theorem B (see  [12]). If f is absolutely continuous on [0, h] with f(0) = 0, then

()

The equality in (2) holds if and only if f(x) = cx, where c is a constant.

The first natural extension of Opial’s inequality (1) involving higher order derivatives x(n)(s)  (n  ≥   1) is embodied in the following.

Theorem C (see  [10]). Let x(t) ∈ C(n)[0, a] be such that x(i)(0) = 0,   0 ≤ in − 1  (n  ≥   1). Then the following inequality holds:

()

In 1997, Alzer [13] considered Opial-type inequalities which involve higher-order derivatives of two functions. These generalize earlier results of Agarwal and Pang [14].

In this paper, we consider the Opial-type inequality which involves higher-order delta derivatives of two functions on time scales. Our results in special cases yield some of the recent results on Opial’s inequality and provide some new estimates on such types of inequalities in this general setting.

2. Main Results

Let 𝕋 be a time scale; that is, 𝕋 is an arbitrary nonempty closed subset of real numbers. Let a, b𝕋. We suppose that the reader is familiar with the basic features of calculus on time scales for dynamic equations. Otherwise one can consult Bohner and Peterson’s book [15] for most of the materials needed.

We first quote the following elementary lemma and the delta time scales Taylor formula.

Lemma 1 (see  [16]). Let a  ≥   0,   p  ≥ 1 be real constants. Then

()
for any k > 0.

Lemma 2 (see [17].)Let the set of functions that are m times differentiable with rd-continuous derivatives on 𝕋,  m. Then for any a,  b𝕋 and t ∈ [a, b]∩𝕋,

()
where .

Our main results are given in the following theorems.

Theorem 3. Let 0 ≤ rs < t, s > 0, t > 1 be real numbers, and let m, k be integers with 0 ≤ km − 1. Let p > 0 and q ≥ 0 be measurable functions on Υ : = [a, b]∩𝕋. Further, let with , and let be absolutely continuous on Υ such that the integrals and exist. Then one has

()
where α : = s/t, β : = r/s,
()

Proof. Since , we obtain from Taylor′s theorem that for all xΥ,

()
and hence
()

From (9) and Hölder′s inequality we get

()
where ,  .

Let

()

Then we have

()

So (10) together with (12) implies

()
where h(x): = q(x)p(x) s/tP(x) r(t−1)/t. Integrating both sides of (13) over Υ and making use of Hölder′s inequality, we obtain
()

Similarly, we get

()

Recall the elementary inequalities

()
where
()

Let β = r/s. Since α = s/t ∈ (0, 1) and F is nondecreasing, from (14)–(16), we have

()

By Lemma 1, we get

()

From (18) and (19), we conclude

()

The proof is complete.

Theorem 4. Let r ≥ 0, s > 0, s < t, t > 1 be real numbers, and let m, k be integers with 0 ≤ km − 1. Let p > 0, and q ≥ 0 be measurable functions on Υ : = [a,   b]∩𝕋. Further, let f,  with let , and be absolutely continuous on Υ such that the integrals and exist. Then one has

()
where , β : = r/s, α : = s/t, h(x): = q(x)p(x) αP(x) r(t−1)/t, , and
()

Proof. Following the proof of Theorem 3, we obtain

()

Using (16),

()

The proof is complete.

Remark 5. In the special case where 𝕋 = , Theorem 4 reduces to Theorem 1 of [13].

Theorem 6. Let , Υ : = [a,   b]∩𝕋 be such that , 0 ≤ km − 1, let be absolutely continuous on Υ, and let . Then

()

Proof. From the hypotheses, we have

()

Multiplying (26) by and using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain

()

Integrating both sides over x from a to b and using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we observe

()

The proof is complete.

Theorem 7. Let p(x) > 0, q(x) be nonnegative and measurable on Υ = [a, b]∩𝕋, and let be such that , 0 ≤ km − 1. If is absolutely continuous on Υ, then for r > 1, rk > 0, and any 0 ≤ rm < r,

()
where , ,.

Proof. Following the hypotheses, it is easy to see that (26) holds. By using Hölder′s inequality with indices r and r/(r − 1), we obtain

()
where , . So we get
()
and hence for any rm,
()

Thus for rk > 0,

()

Integrating both sides of (33) from a to b and applying Hölder′s inequality with indices r/rm and r/(rrm), we obtain

()
where . The proof is complete.

Remark 8. In the special case where 𝕋 = , Theorems 6 and 7 reduce to Theorems 1 and 2 of [18].

Acknowledgments

The first author′s research was supported by NSF of China (11071054), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (A2011205012). The second author′s research was partially supported by an HKU URG grant.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.