1. Introduction
As is well known, the Bernoulli polynomials are defined by generating functions as follows:
(1.1)
(see [
1–
11]). In the special case,
x = 0,
Bn(0) =
Bn are called the
nth Bernoulli numbers. The Euler polynomials are also defined by
(1.2)
with the usual convention about replacing
En(
x) by
En(
x) (see [
1–
11]). From (
1.1) and (
1.2), we can easily derive the following equation:
(1.3)
By (
1.1) and (
1.3), we get
(1.4)
From (
1.1), we have
(1.5)
Thus, by (
1.5), we get
(1.6)
It is known that
En(0) =
En are called the
nth Euler numbers (see [
7]). The Euler polynomials are also given by
(1.7)
(see [
6]). From (
1.7), we can derive the following equation:
(1.8)
By the definition of Bernoulli and Euler numbers, we get the following recurrence formulae:
(1.9)
where
δn,k is the kronecker symbol (see [
5]). From (
1.6), (
1.8), and (
1.9), we note that
(1.10)
where
n ∈
ℤ+. The following identity is known in [
5]:
(1.11)
From the identities of Bernoulli polynomials, we derive some new and interesting integral formulae of an arithmetical nature on the Bernoulli polynomials.
2. Integral Formulae of Bernoulli Polynomials
From (
1.1) and (
1.2), we note that
(2.1)
Therefore, by (1.2) and (2.1), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1. For n ∈ ℤ+, one has
(2.2)
Let us take the definite integral from 0 to 1 on both sides of (
1.4): for
n ≥ 2,
(2.3)
Therefore, by (2.4), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.2. For n ∈ ℕ, with n ≥ 2, one has
(2.5)
Let us take
k =
m,
a = 0, and
b = −2 in (
1.11). Then we have
(2.6)
It is easy to show that
(2.7)
Let us consider the integral from 0 to 1 in (
2.6):
(2.8)
By (
2.6) and (
2.8), we get
(2.9)
Therefore, by (
2.9), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.3. For m ∈ ℕ, one has
(2.10)
Lemma 2.4. Let a, b ∈ ℤ. For m, k ∈ ℤ+, one has
(2.11)
(see [
5]).
Let us take
k =
m,
a = 1,
b = −2 in Lemma
2.4. Then we have
(2.12)
Taking integral from 0 to 1 in (
2.12), we get
(2.13)
It is easy to show that
(2.14)
Thus, by (
2.13) and (
2.14), we get
(2.15)
Therefore, by (2.2) and (2.15), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.5. For m ∈ ℤ+, one has
(2.16)
3. p-Adic Integral on ℤp Associated with Bernoulli and Euler Numbers
Let
p be a fixed odd prime number. Throughout this section,
ℤp,
ℚp, and
ℂp will denote the ring of
p-adic integers, the field of
p-adic rational numbers, and the completion of algebraic closure of
ℚp, respectively. Let
νp be the normalized exponential valuation of
ℂp with
. Let
UD(
ℤp) be the space of uniformly differentiable functions on
ℤp. For
f ∈
UD(
ℤp), the bosonic
p-adic integral on
ℤp is defined by
(3.1)
(see [
8]). Thus, by (
3.1), we get
(3.2)
where
f1(
x) =
f(
x + 1), and
f′(0) =
df(
x)/
dx|
x=0. Let us take
f(
y) =
et(x+y). Then we have
(3.3)
From (
3.3), we have
(3.4)
From (
1.2), we can derive the following integral equation:
(3.5)
Thus, from (
3.4) and (
3.5), we get
(3.6)
From (
3.6), we have
(3.7)
The fermionic
p-adic integral on
ℤp is defined by Kim as follows [
6,
7]:
(3.8)
Let
f1(
x) =
f(
x + 1). Then we have
(3.9)
Continuing this process, we obtain the following equation:
(3.10)
Thus, by (
3.10), we have
(3.11)
Let us take
f(
y) =
et(x+y). By (
3.9), we get
(3.12)
From (
3.2), we have the Witt′s formula for the
nth Euler polynomials and numbers as follows:
(3.13)
By (
3.11) and (
3.13), we get
(3.14)
Let us consider the following
p-adic integral on
ℤp:
(3.15)
From (
1.4) and (
3.15), we have
(3.16)
Therefore, by (
3.15) and (
3.16), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.1. For n ∈ ℤ+, one has
(3.17)
By (
1.4), we get
(3.19)
Therefore, by (
3.18) and (
3.19), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.2. For n ∈ ℤ+, one has
(3.20)
Let us consider the following integral on
ℤp:
(3.21)
From (
2.2), we have
(3.22)
Therefore, by (
3.21) and (
3.22), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.3. For n ∈ ℤ+, one has
(3.23)
By (
2.2), we get
(3.25)
Therefore, by (
3.24) and (
3.25), we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 3.4. For n ∈ ℤ+, we have
(3.26)
Let us assume that
a,
b,
c,
d ∈
ℤ. From Lemma
2.4 and (
3.13), we note that
(3.27)
Thus, by (3.28) and (3.13), we obtain the following lemma (see [5]).
Lemma 3.5. Let a, b, c, d ∈ ℤ. For m, k ∈ ℤ+, one has
(3.29)
Let us consider the formula in Lemma
3.5 with
d =
c − 1. Then we have
(3.30)
Taking
on both sides of (
3.30),
(3.31)
By the same method, we get
(3.32)
Therefore, by (
3.31) and (
3.32), we obtain the following proposition.
Proposition 3.6. Let a, b, c ∈ ℤ. Then one has
(3.33)
Replacing
c by
c + 1, we have
(3.34)
From (3.4) and (3.7), we derive some identity for the first term of the LHS of (3.34).
The first term of the LHS of (
3.34)
(3.35)
where
(3.36)
The second term of the LHS of (
3.34)
(3.37)
Therefore, by (3.34), (3.35), and (3.37), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.7. Let a, b, c ∈ ℤ with c ≥ 1. Then one has
(3.38)
where
(3.39)
Remark 3.8. Here, we note that
(3.40)
Acknowledgment
The first author was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government 2011-0002486.