Optimal Inequalities for Power Means
Abstract
We present the best possible power mean bounds for the product for any p > 0, α ∈ (0,1), and all a, b > 0 with a ≠ b. Here, Mp(a, b) is the pth power mean of two positive numbers a and b.
1. Introduction
It is well known that Mp(a, b) is continuous and strictly increasing with respect to p ∈ ℝ for fixed a, b > 0 with a ≠ b. Many classical means are special cases of the power mean, for example, M−1(a, b) = H(a, b) = 2ab/(a + b), and M1(a, b) = A(a, b) = (a + b)/2 are the harmonic, geometric and arithmetic means of a and b, respectively. Recently, the power mean has been the subject of intensive research. In particular, many remarkable inequalities and properties for the power mean can be found in literature [1–22].
It is the aim of this paper to present the best possible power mean bounds for the product for any p > 0, α ∈ (0,1) and all a, b > 0 with a ≠ b.
2. Main Result
Theorem 2.1. Let p > 0, α ∈ (0,1) and a, b > 0 with a ≠ b. Then
- (1)
for α = 1/2,
- (2)
for α > 1/2 and for α < 1/2, and the bounds M(2α−1)p(a, b) and M0(a, b) for the product in either case are best possible.
Proof. From (1.1) we clearly see that Mp(a, b) is symmetric and homogenous of degree 1. Without loss of generality, we assume that b = 1, a = x > 1.
- (1)
If α = 1/2, then (1.1) leads to
- (2)
Firstly, we compare the value of M(2α−1)p(x, 1) to the value of for α ∈ (0,1/2)∪(1/2,1). From (1.1) we have
Let
If α ∈ (1/2,1), then (2.9) implies that h(x) is strictly decreasing in [1, +∞). Therefore, follows easily from (2.2)–(2.8) and the monotonicity of h(x).
If α ∈ (0,1/2), then (2.9) leads to the conclusion that h(x) is strictly increasing in [1, +∞). Therefore, follows easily from (2.2)–(2.8) and the monotonicity of h(x).
Secondly, we compare the value of M0(x, 1) to the value of . It follows from (1.1) that
Let
If α ∈ (1/2,1), then (2.13) implies that F(x) is strictly increasing in [1, +∞). Therefore, follows easily from (2.10)–(2.12) and the monotonicity of F(x).
If α ∈ (0,1/2), then (2.13) leads to the conclusion that F(x) is strictly decreasing in [1, +∞). Therefore, follows easily from (2.10)–(2.12) and the monotonicity of F(x).
Next, we prove that the bound M(2α−1)p(a, b) for the product in either case is best possible.
If α ∈ (0,1/2), then for any ϵ ∈ (0, (1 − 2α)p) and x > 0 we have
Letting x → 0 and making use of Taylor’s expansion, one has
Equations (2.14) and (2.15) imply that for any α ∈ (0,1/2) and ϵ ∈ (0, (1 − 2α)p) there exists δ1 = δ1(ϵ) > 0, such that for x ∈ (0, δ1).
If α ∈ (1/2,1), then for any ϵ ∈ (0, (2α − 1)p) and x > 0 we have
Letting x → 0 and making use of Taylor’s expansion, one has
Equations (2.16) and (2.17) imply that for any α ∈ (1/2,1) and ϵ ∈ (0, (2α − 1)p) there exists δ2 = δ2(ϵ) > 0, such that for x ∈ (0, δ2).
Finally, we prove that the bound M0(a, b) for the product in either case is best possible.
If α ∈ (0,1/2), then for any ϵ > 0 we clearly see that
Equation (2.18) implies that for any α ∈ (0,1/2) and ϵ > 0 there exists T1 = T1(ϵ) > 1, such that for x ∈ (T1, +∞).
If α ∈ (1/2,1), then for any ϵ > 0 we have
Equation (2.19) implies that for any α ∈ (1/2,1) and ϵ > 0 there exists T2 = T2(ϵ) > 1, such that for x ∈ (T2, +∞).
Acknowledgments
This paper was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 11071069 and 11171307, the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province under Grant 09JJ6003, and the Innovation Team Foundation of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province under Grant T200924.