Volume 2012, Issue 1 182905
Research Article
Open Access

Optimal Inequalities for Power Means

Yong-Min Li

Yong-Min Li

Department of Mathematics, Huzhou Teachers College, Huzhou 313000, China hutc.zj.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Bo-Yong Long

Bo-Yong Long

School of Mathematics Science, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China ahu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Yu-Ming Chu

Corresponding Author

Yu-Ming Chu

Department of Mathematics, Huzhou Teachers College, Huzhou 313000, China hutc.zj.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Wei-Ming Gong

Wei-Ming Gong

Department of Mathematics, Hunan City University, Yiyang 413000, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 April 2012
Citations: 2
Academic Editor: Hector Pomares

Abstract

We present the best possible power mean bounds for the product for any p > 0, α ∈ (0,1), and all a, b > 0 with ab. Here, Mp(a, b) is the pth power mean of two positive numbers a and b.

1. Introduction

For p, the pth power mean Mp(a, b) of two positive numbers a and b is defined by
(1.1)

It is well known that Mp(a, b) is continuous and strictly increasing with respect to p for fixed a, b > 0 with ab. Many classical means are special cases of the power mean, for example, M−1(a, b) = H(a, b) = 2ab/(a + b), and M1(a, b) = A(a, b) = (a + b)/2 are the harmonic, geometric and arithmetic means of a and b, respectively. Recently, the power mean has been the subject of intensive research. In particular, many remarkable inequalities and properties for the power mean can be found in literature [122].

Let L(a, b) = (ab)/(log a − log b), and be the logarithmic, Seiffert and identric means of two positive numbers a and b with ab, respectively. Then it is well known that
(1.2)
for all a, b > 0 with ab.
In [2329], the authors presented the sharp power mean bounds for L, I, (IL) 1/2 and (L + I)/2 as follows:
(1.3)
for all a, b > 0 with ab.
Alzer and Qiu [12] proved that the inequality
(1.4)
holds for all a, b > 0 with ab if and only if p ≤ (log 2)/(1 + log 2) = 0.40938….
The following sharp bounds for the sum αA(a, b)+(1 − α)L(a, b), and the products Aα(a, b)L1−α(a, b) and Gα(a, b)L1−α(a, b) in terms of power means were proved in [5, 8]:
(1.5)
for any α ∈ (0,1) and all a, b > 0 with ab.
In [2, 7] the authors answered the questions: for any α ∈ (0,1), what are the greatest values p1 = p1(α), p2 = p2(α), p3 = p3(α), and p4 = p4(α), and the least values q1 = q1(α), q2 = q2(α), q3 = q3(α), and q4 = q4(α), such that the inequalities
(1.6)
hold for all a, b > 0 with ab?

It is the aim of this paper to present the best possible power mean bounds for the product for any p > 0, α ∈ (0,1) and all a, b > 0 with ab.

2. Main Result

Theorem 2.1. Let p > 0, α ∈ (0,1) and a, b > 0 with ab. Then

  • (1)

    for α = 1/2,

  • (2)

    for α > 1/2 and for α < 1/2, and the bounds M(2α−1)p(a, b) and M0(a, b) for the product in either case are best possible.

Proof. From (1.1) we clearly see that Mp(a, b) is symmetric and homogenous of degree 1. Without loss of generality, we assume that b = 1, a = x > 1.

  • (1)

    If α = 1/2, then (1.1) leads to

(2.1)
  • (2)

    Firstly, we compare the value of M(2α−1)p(x, 1) to the value of for α ∈ (0,1/2)∪(1/2,1). From (1.1) we have

(2.2)

Let

(2.3)
then simple computations lead to
(2.4)
(2.5)
where
(2.6)
(2.7)
where
(2.8)
(2.9)

If α ∈ (1/2,1), then (2.9) implies that h(x) is strictly decreasing in [1, +). Therefore, follows easily from (2.2)–(2.8) and the monotonicity of h(x).

If α ∈ (0,1/2), then (2.9) leads to the conclusion that h(x) is strictly increasing in [1, +). Therefore, follows easily from (2.2)–(2.8) and the monotonicity of h(x).

Secondly, we compare the value of M0(x, 1) to the value of . It follows from (1.1) that

(2.10)

Let

(2.11)
then simple computations lead to
(2.12)
(2.13)

If α ∈ (1/2,1), then (2.13) implies that F(x) is strictly increasing in [1, +). Therefore, follows easily from (2.10)–(2.12) and the monotonicity of F(x).

If α ∈ (0,1/2), then (2.13) leads to the conclusion that F(x) is strictly decreasing in [1, +). Therefore, follows easily from (2.10)–(2.12) and the monotonicity of F(x).

Next, we prove that the bound M(2α−1)p(a, b) for the product in either case is best possible.

If α ∈ (0,1/2), then for any ϵ ∈ (0, (1 − 2α)p) and x > 0 we have

(2.14)

Letting x → 0 and making use of Taylor’s expansion, one has

(2.15)

Equations (2.14) and (2.15) imply that for any α ∈ (0,1/2) and ϵ ∈ (0, (1 − 2α)p) there exists δ1 = δ1(ϵ) > 0, such that for x ∈ (0, δ1).

If α ∈ (1/2,1), then for any ϵ ∈ (0, (2α − 1)p) and x > 0 we have

(2.16)

Letting x → 0 and making use of Taylor’s expansion, one has

(2.17)

Equations (2.16) and (2.17) imply that for any α ∈ (1/2,1) and ϵ ∈ (0, (2α − 1)p) there exists δ2 = δ2(ϵ) > 0, such that for x ∈ (0, δ2).

Finally, we prove that the bound M0(a, b) for the product in either case is best possible.

If α ∈ (0,1/2), then for any ϵ > 0 we clearly see that

(2.18)

Equation (2.18) implies that for any α ∈ (0,1/2) and ϵ > 0 there exists T1 = T1(ϵ) > 1, such that for x ∈ (T1, +).

If α ∈ (1/2,1), then for any ϵ > 0 we have

(2.19)

Equation (2.19) implies that for any α ∈ (1/2,1) and ϵ > 0 there exists T2 = T2(ϵ) > 1, such that for x ∈ (T2, +).

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 11071069 and 11171307, the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province under Grant 09JJ6003, and the Innovation Team Foundation of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province under Grant T200924.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.